ML20080F662

Contention Re Emergency Planning for State of Nh Beach Communities.Emergency Response Plans Do Not Provide Reasonable Assurance of Safety Due to Transient Beach Population.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20080F662
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	09/09/1983
From:	Shotwell J MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20080F639	List: ML20080F635 ML20080F651 ML20080F662
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8309190357
Download: ML20080F662 (20)

Text

1 o

e **

L, ,,

DOCKETED usuc UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

.h p 16 /di:53 NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSIOf[CE[Tnqs 0~ SECREru ,

- ,_ ,g

• ATOMIC' SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:

Helen F. Hoyt, Chairperson Emmeth A. Luebke Jerry Harbour

)

In the Matter of ) Dockst Nos. 50-443-OL

) 50-444-OL PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF )

et al. )

NEW HAMPSHIR3, (Seabrook Stati E,Tnits 1 )

and 2) ) September 9, 1983

)

CONTENTION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

, FRANCIS X. BELLOTTI RELATIVE TO EMERGENCY l PLANNING FOR THE NEW HAMPSHIRE BEACH COMMUNITIES l

l . On August 23, 1983, the' Board ordered that contentions relating to off-site emergency planning for any or all of the l fif teen New Eanpshire communities for which draf t emergency plans were recently submitted 1! be filed on or before this date. In accordance with that order, Attorney General Bellotti hereby submits a single contention which relates to off-site i 1/ Obe fifteen communities are Hampton, Newton, Rye, Stratham, l Exeter, New Castle, North Hampton, Seabrook, Brentwood,

! -Kensington, Newfields, Portsmouth, South Hampton, East Kingston, and Kingston.

8309190357 830909 PDR ADOCK 05000443 j O PM

emergency action in the coastal beach areas of Seabrook,

'Sampton, North Hampton, and Rye which are frequented by Massachusetts citizens.

CONTENTION:

The-draft radiological emergency response plans for the Towns of Seabrook, Hampton, North Ha:npton, and Rye do not provide reasonable assurance that adequate protective' measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency at the Seabrook Station, as required by 10 C.F.R. 550.47(a)(1),

because in the event of a severe' acc: dant on a summer weekend some or all of the beach area transient populations within those communities cannot under many p~.ausible meteorological conditions be protected by means of evacuation even from early death and because there are not adequate plans or provisions for sheltering the beach area transients within those

. communities.

BASES:

The draft emergency response plans for the Towns of Seabrook, Hampton, North Haupton, and Rye all rely on evacuation and sheltering as the two options for protecting persons present in those communities at the time of a radiological emergency at Seabrook Station which results in a radiological release to areas within those communities. See, e.c., Seabrook Plan, at II II-18; Rye Plan, at II II-18; North Hampton Plan, at II II-20; and Hampton Plan,

at II II-20. However, a preliminary site-specific

-accident. consequence ,

analysis performed for the Massachusetts Attorney General has revealed that, given the unus'ual J .:

/ circ'umstances associated with dense beach populations,

.svac'hation cannot protect the transient beach area populations inthevicinity.oftheSeabrooksitefromearlhdeathinthe event of a PWR 2 release as defined in the NRC's Reactor Safety Stucy (WASH-1400) on a summer weekend.

A Seabrook-specific accident consequence analysis is being performed for the Department of the Attorney General by Dr. Jan Beyea, a nuclear physicist with extensive experience in accident consequence modelling and analysis. (A copy of Dr.

. Beyea's resume is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.) Dr. Beyea has advised the Department that there are unique considerations involved in the modelling

~

j-1 'and analysis of accident consequences for a site such as 4 Seabrook having a large summer beach area population which have r

[

never before been taken into account in generic or site-specific. consequence studies., In addition to the obvious

. effects on accident consequences of the increased population and evacuation times associated with summer beach areas and the absence of shielding normally provided by buildings, there are increased consequences due to material deposited directly on the skin and hair of beachgoers and on vehicles in the plume.

The former factor has received no consideration in accident l

consequence analyses in the_past and the latter has received inadequate consideration. -

In the work which Dr. Beyea and his assistant' Brian palenik, a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Terinology, have performed for this Department to date they have investigated the conditions under which the nearest beach population to this site, at about two miles, might be exposed to doses at a threshold level for early death (200 rem) in the event of a PWR 2 release as defined in the Reactor Safety Study

(~n'ASE-1400 ) . Estimates of the time within which that population would receive a 200 rem dose have been calculated for various veather stability classes and wind speeds using two sets of assunptions. The first set assumes that all persons are inside automobiles when the release occurs and receive only a fraction of the doses they would receive if they were in the open, exposed directly to a plane of contaminated ground.

9

. These results have-been calculated using the assumptions which have beretofore been considered standard in accident consequence calculations. The second set of results goes beyond the standard assumptions, to account specifically for the Seabrook beach situation. Those results assume that some of the population will not have reached their vehicles before pinse passage such that there will be a " skin deposition dose"

- and a " car deposition dose." For each of the two sets of results calculations have been performed separately for high

-3_

and lov energy release rates. This division was necessary l l

given the large encertainty in the height to which the radicartive plume will rise, a factor which is affected by i emergy release rates and which is an important determinant of the doses to a nearby population.

Celes I and 2, which follow hereafter, contain the results of Dr. Beyea's modelling and analysis as described above. The entries it the last column of each table result from a com.sarison between the time required to reach a 200 rem dose and current estinates of the time required to evacuate the pop:1ation within two miles on a summer weekend. See Table 3.

The data set forth in these tables reveal that the summer wester.d beach population within two miles of the Seabrook site cannot be protected from early death by means of evacuation ander nacy weather conditions.

I: sbo:ld be noted that neither precipitation nor slow wind

~. g speeds have been considered in the analyses set forth in Tables i

1 a:d 2. 3 ort such conditions are more severe than those ,

represented it the tables. The frequencies of the Pasquill statility classes reflected in Tables 1 and 2 as reported in

be~ Applicants' ER-OL are given in Table 4. The frequencies of Ibe A, 3, and C stability classes increase during the summer Ic :ts, vi:h C the rost frequent of the three. D and E are the im-" nan: stability classes. The results discussed herein are

-:::. :terefore, based on infrequently occurring or worst-case vea:ter conditions.

~

TABLE 1 FROTECTION OF CLOSEST BEACH POPULATIONa)

FROM EARLY DEATH ON A SUMMER WEEKEND DAY EIGH ENERGY RELEASE RATED)

Dose Stability:) Wind Speed Scalingd) Time to Reach Protection *I Class (z/sec) Factor 200 rem of Population?

A 2 .53 .78 14.5-20.9 Yes A 2 1.0-1.3 9.0-11.5 Yes A 4 .53 .78 > 24 Yes A 4 1.0-1.3 19.2-25.0 Yes E 2 .53 .78 4.6-6.'4 No E 2 1.0-1.3 3.2-3.8 No

~E 4 .53 .78 12.2-17.8 Yes 9

E. 4 1.0-1.3 7.6-9.6 Yes C 2 .53 .78 2.6-3.4 No C 2 1.0-1.3 1.9-2.2 No C 4 .53 .78 8-11.5 Yes C- 4 1.0-1.3 5.1-6.4 No ,

D 2 .53 .78 )> 24 Yes C I 1.0-1.3 )* 24 Yes L 4 .53 .78 6.5-9.2 Yes E 4 1.0-1.3 4.2-5.3 No

c.  ::s po;; a:io two miles from the plant.

J.ss'er.er an ens gy release rate of 176 x 106 Btu / hour.

-c; Fasq ill stability class.

'd : 7:e dose scaling f ae:o: range of .53 .78 assumes an individual is in a car v4-~-'- --* pS-* "he dose scaling factor range of 1.0-1.3 assumes ar. : d vidral is in a car within the plume, with a dose component from rad: a tive raterial deposited on the car and directly on the individual, o,. F:::*ctit: cf ::e popciation from a 200 rem dose or higher. This ass;m== =- traccatic: time of about five and a half hours. If the e v a:_ ati:: zire is 1:nger, the population is not necessarily protected.

a TABLE 2 PEOTECTION OF CLOSEST BEACH POPULATIONa)

FEOM EARLY DEATH ON A SUMMER WEEKEND DAY LOW ENERGY RELEASE RATEb)

Dose StabilityC) Wind Speed Scalingd) Time to Reach Protection

• Class (m/sec) Factor 200 rem of-Population?

A 2 .53 .78 13.8-19.9 Yes A 2 1.0-1.3 8.6-10.9 Yes A 4 .53 .78 )>24 Yes A 4 1.0-1.3 18.4-23.7 Yes E 2 .53 .78 3.7-4.9 No E 2 1.0-1.3 2.5-3.0 No E 4 .53 .78 9.9-14.2 Yes E 4 1.0-1.3 6.2-7.8 Yes C 2 .53 .78 4,1 No C 2 1.0-1.3 <[1 No C 4 .53 .78 l 1.7-2.2 No C 4 1.0-1.3 1.3-1.5 No ,

D 2 .53 .78 <[ 1 No D 2 1.0-1.3 (, 1 No D 4 .53 .78 <[1 No 0 4 1.0-1.3 <C 1 No

a. Tr.e p gulatio two tiles from the plant.

Ass';2er an energy release rate of 20 x 106 Btu / hour, or an equivalently Icw pitme for reasons unrelated to the energy release rate.

P asquill stability class.

d, :e d:ss scaling factor range of .53 .78 assumes an individual is in a d- '

--c piers. The dose scaling factor range of 1.0-1.3 assumes car vi-an ind vidual is in a car within the plume, with a dose component from radicarnive-ta:erial deposited on the car and directly on the individual.

o. 7:::+::100 cf :ts population from a 200 rem dose or higher. This a s z;m e an evac;a:icn time of about five and a half hours. If the eta: ation tire is longer, the population is not necessarily protected.

l i

2ABLE 3 SEABROOK EVACUATION CLEAR TIME ESTIMATESa)

SUMMER WEEKEND / FAIR WEATHER SCENARIO Radies Degrees HMMb) Vorhees c) Maguire 0I NRC*

0-2 360* 4:50 5:10 5:40 ---

0-3 180' E 5:20 --- --- ---

0-5 360' 5:50 5:10-5:40 --- ---

0-10 360* 6:05 -5:10-6:10 5:50 11:25 c, Tims (tours: minutes) for the population to clear the indicated area after notification.

b; Pre'isinary Evacuation Clear Time Estimates for Areas Near Seabrook Starion, EMM Document No. C-80-024A, HMM Associates, Inc., May 20, 1980.

c1 Final ?.eport, Estimate of Evacuation Times, Alan M. Vorhees & Associates, July 1980.

d) Etergsccy Planning Zone Evacuation Clear Time Estimates, C.E. Maguire, I r. c . , Feburary 1983.,

0) Ar. :ndependent Assessment of Evacuation Time Estimatos for a Peak Pop:lation Scenario in the Emergency Planning Zone of the Seabrook

!iaclear Power Station,.M.P. Mueller, et al., Pacific Northwest Laboratory

!;CRIG/CR-2903, PNL-4290.

e

TABLE 4 FREQ7ESCY OF PASQUILL STABILITY CLASSES AT SEABROOKa)

(values in % of Time)

Month A B C D, E_ F G, Apr 1979 1.27 2.11 3.80 49.65 29.40 7.88 5.91 May 1.23 2.86 4.82 52.86 26.51 5.27 6.48 Jun 2.92 6.69 12.26 39.83 25.49 6.13 6.69 Jul 4.93 6.94 11.56 29.12 28.84 12.65 5.99 Aug 2.91 4.71 9.97 43.07 26.59 7.34 5.40

-s ,

Sep 1.25 7.64 11.81 30.69 27.36 10.83 10.42 Oct 3. 8- - 2.96 5.79 39.30 34.05 10.09 7.00 Nov 0.0L O.56 4.76 43.92 34.83 9.37 6.57 Dac 3.00 0.41 2.70 47.03 41.35 5.81 2.70 Jan 1950 3.13 1.88 6.59 51.88 30.38 5.78 3.36 Feb 3.44 1.03 5.37 50.36 34.69 5.66 1.45 Mar 13. 6 E 1.64 5.34 43.15 24.66 6.03 8.49

. Yearly 1.21 1.37 7.08 43.31 30.38 7.76 5.87 c; Ps:iod cf Record: April 1979 - March 1980. Stability class calculated ts ng -43 '-209 ' delta temperature. Source:' SB 1&2, ER-OLS, Table 2.3-24.

4

_ .- - . ~ . . y,

-w-- re,<w- -

, ~ ,-

The size of the beach area population around Seabrook is tacertain. One estimate of this population for 1980 has been sade by Public Service Company of New Ziampshire and is found in Table 5. Although its accuracy is uncertain, this estimate

.does indicate that a substantial number of people are located withir. two miles of the plant. The number of persons that wocid be located within a plume obviously varies with wind direction, but it also varies with stability class and distance f:cm the plant. At two miles the plume could be viewed as beine between a 29' wedge (A stability class) and a 13* wedge (D stability class)2/ compared to the 22.5 population wedges in the table.

In addition to investigating the conditions under which the beacc population within two miles of the Seabrook site might be exposed to early death doses, Dr. Beyea and Mr. Palenik have co=menced work designed to determine the radius within which early deaths might result in the vicinity of this site assuming ac accidental release on a summer weekend. Dr. Beyea has found .

early death radii ranging from <2 to 4.3 miles assuming a PWR 2 release as defined in the Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400), C stability class weather conditions, an evacuation time of 5-1/2 hours, and the two sets of dose scaling factors discussed pr evi ously. For. weather conditions with overcast skies (D 2/ 'Redges are assumed to have plume widths equal to three tires the horirontal dispersion coefficient.

TABLE 5 19E0 EEACE AEEA TRANSIENT POPULATION ESTINATEa) BY SECTORD)

El:g- Iadii (niles; NI ENE E ESE SE SSE 0-1 D 0 0 0 0 0 1-2 464 '

14,647 12,780 5,842 129 23 2-2 1,;04 8,882 0 0 3,905 654 3-4 E,719 608 0 0 0 6,198 4-5 4,244 0 0 0 0 8,880 5 -1~ 5,E60 0 0 0 0 16,597 Source: Fublic Service of New Hampshire, Seabrook Station - Units 1 & 2, Environnectal Eeport, Operating License Stage, Figure 2.1-19.

c Estimate of peak transient population found by multiplying the capacit'y of ~:eacs area parking lots (less leased space) by 3.2 persons per vehicle, and contributions f rom of f-street parking users, seasonal res; den:s, End overnight visitors, b; Eac: direction in the table is the centerline of a 22.5 degree wedge.

l l

. , , . . - , - . - , , - - - ..-n.. - --

r

.- stability class), or longer evacuation times,3/ the early death :adii will be larger. And the time before doses reach 20C Cen, assuming a PWR 2 release on a summer weekend evening and a ~ow energy release rate such as that assumed in the draft Seabro:k Probabilistic Risk Assessment, is less than four hours cat to 6-7 =iles f rom the site. Thus, the beach area pop:lation within 6-7 miles exposed to the plume would not be prc:ected from early death even if there were a 20-30 percent red:ction in evacuation times from daytime to evening. It she:ld be noted in this connection that at least the Hampton Beach area has a very substantial nighttime population.

Ch's, a prinary accident consequence data developed for this Depir:nect reveal that evacuation cannot under a number of pla:sible weather conditions protect the summer weekend beach area peptlations in the vicinity of this site from even early death . The results described herein do not account for the less severe consequences of radiation illness and delayed fattlities due to latent cancers. Despite the severe .

IL=itations oc the utility of evacuation as a protective option fer the transient beach population, however, there are

~

l Oc::e=tly no provisions for sheltering that populatien within

-c ro t . Neither the New Hampshire Radiological Emergency 3/ =e Applicants have now provided a 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 5 minutes is::: ate fcr s -rer weekend simultaneous beach evacuation v'- '- en ciles of the site. See Applicants' Direct Testimony 5:. .. filed Caly 15, 1983, at 19-20.

I t

F.esponse Plan nor the local community plans contain any analysis of available public sheltering, or its capacity to secommodate the beach populations or to provide shielding from radionuclides, or any plans for effecting such sheltering. In shcrt, there is at present no basis for (and has not been) any deve_optent of sheltering as a potential protective action for the 'each c population.

Respectfully subatted, FRANCIS X. BELLOTTI ATTORNEY GENERAL By: A s "

sh JO ARN SHOTWELL Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 (617) 727-2265 i

L

r "

" EXHIBIT A"-

• April 1983 .

. E**M 3h /

Fr..D., Columbia University,1968 (fluclear Physics)

E. A_ , Acherst College,1962 Er?'.CwE;C .-!ISTORY:

1 5E,0 te' date, Senior Energy Scientist, :tational Audubon Society, '

950 Third Avenue, New York, llew York 10022.

.97E to 1980, Research Staff, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Prir.ceton University.

5 0 I: 2976, Assistar.t Professor of Physics, Holy Cross College.

..:H to ;970, :.esearcn Associate, Columoia University Fnysics Department.

. . . .: _ . . . .e cs . r. ..

. al:an: cn nuclear energy to tne Office of Tecnnology Assessment, the New

. sese. +:arrent cf Envircnmental PrctEction the ' Offices of the Attorney General in

• =

.  ::r. 5 tate and the Ccronweal th. of :4assachusetts; the state of lower Saxony in

.ss: Ee mar.y; :.a Swedish Energy Commissior; and various citizens' groups in the

.' ' e: E .ates.

E_- : :CG IC CEE*;I:45 EifERGY CONSERVATION IND ENERGY POLICY:

C:r .er.:s er Energy Forecasting," r.aterial submitted fer the record at

e ' ea-ings ~ sft-re tne Sunconr.ittee on Investigations and Oversights of the

-i: se en Science ar.d Tecnnology, U. 5. Ecuse of Representatives; Committee -

I'i- t. 7:.:.e 1, 2, 1951 / !!c. 14 /.

T-e kcson Energy P'an Technical Re;: ort," Peterson, Beyea, Paulson and

.: e". :iaticr.ai kddon Ecciety, Acril 1981.

[

L:cating and Eii=trI4 ting Obscure but Major Energy Lesses .in Residential 4:.si ;." Earrje, N:t and Beyea, ASHRAE Transactions , 85, Fart II (1979).

E'.~er .f. ASH:.AE c::tstanding paper award. )

ric Eeat 1. css and Conservation Policy," Dutt, Seyea, Sinden. ASME Te:-- .:r._y and ic:iety Division paper 78-TS-5, Houston. Te>.as,1978.

'C~=ments or. :he proposed FTC trade regulation rule on labeling and adver-

's' : of the:- al insulation," Jan Beyea and Gautam Dutt, testimony before the

- e:s-si Trade Co"T-ission, January 1978.

6 ^ ~.-frical Sf grificance of ' Attics and Baserents in the Energy Balance of

- i- :#ters Ted. arses." Seyea, Dutt, Weteki, Enercy e d Buildings,-Voluw .I

:i;e ?f'.. T.s: C*.arter 3 of Saving Ener y n :ne Home, Ballinger, 1975.

! e ':: :ss' star.:e **:cei for Attic Hea- Flew: Italications for Conservation

^ :; . E::ed , '.. .:, Eeyea , Enerev--tne !nternational Journal , 3, 657 (1976).

E.er;y-C:.se-va:'cr i- an Old 3-Story Apartment Cc' plex." Beyea, Farrje, e . E.e ;:. .se Macareeert, Fa::clare and Snitn, Pergamen 1977, Volu"'e I,

s. .=. . . . .

.:a: 5.- F:'-: -e:r-i des Usine H re A?;liances," Jan Sefea, Rober: Weathervax,

-E t ; . s e 'ea .a re  :. r :::lare a anc Srith, Pergamen 1978, Volume 111/!'.',

.:,..,.r...-

. 1 - P8.~o's*,1CM10NS CONCERNING. ENERGY R15KS:

f: Articles: , _ . . ,

.~- - "Contairraent of a Reactor Meltdown,"lwith Frank von Hipp'el),

~

Eulletin of the Atomic Scientists , 38., 8Page 52, December 1982.

r . .-

- . "Second Thoughts'.(about Nuclear Safety)," in Nuclear Power: Both Sides, W. W. Norton and Co. (New York,1982). -

~

"Incoor Air Pollution," Commentary in the Builerin of the Atomic Scientists, E, Face 53, February 1981.

"Erergency Planning for Reacter Acticents," E.lietin of tne Atomic i:ie tists, 36, Page 40, December 1980. ( An earlier version cf tnis article

-a:: care: in E an. as Chapter 3 in im Ernstfall hGfics?, E. R. Koch, Fritz

' ahrtr.hcit, editors, Kiepenheuer & W1 scn, Coicene,1980.)

" Dispute at Indian Point," Bulletin of the A:cric Scier.tists, 3, Page 63, F.ay 1980. .

F.t'ished Debates:-

The Crisis of Huclear Enercy, Suojec- No. 357 cn k'illia- Buckley's Firing

!.ine , .5.5.5. Televi sion. Transcript printed by 50.;thern Educational Communications Association, S28 Woodrow Street, P. O. Box 5956, Cciu bia, Scuth Carolina,1979.

'uclear Reactors

How Safe Are They?, panei discussion sponsored by 'the

. A:Ede:rf foru: of The National Academy of Sciences, 2101 Constitution Avenue,

. . L'as' n ington, D. T 20418, May 5, .1980.

Re:cr s: . . .

"I::plications for.: Mortality of Weakening the Clean Air Act," (with

. - G. Steve Jordan), National Audubon Society, Environmental Policy Analysis '

. Depar: ment Report No.18, May 1982.

i

"Some Long-Term Corisecuences of Hypothetical Fajor Releases of Radioactivity I

the A::nosphere from Three Mile Island," Report to the President's Council on

~

.' Enyjronmental Quality, . December 1980.

" Decontamination of Krypton 85 from Three Mile Jsland Nuclear Plant," (with

. rer.dall, et.al.), Report of the Union of Concerned Scientists to the Severne cf Pennsylvania, May 15, 1980.

'Some Cor:9ents on. Consequences of Wypothetical Reacter A: idents at

- e ';nfli:;;ines !;uclear Power Plant" (with Gercen c :sen) . ::ational Aucucen Socie-E t re:mer. .al Policy Analysis Department Report :::. -

• pril 1980. ,

~

iutiear Reactor Accidents: The Value of Improved Containment," (wi-h Frank ve : ?.ippel), Center for Energy and Environmental Studies Report PU/ CEES 94,

ri-:e r. University, January 1980.

"The Effects of Releases to the Atocsphere of Racioactivity from Fyp thetical

.arce-Scale Accidents at the Proposed Gorleoen as:e Treatment Facility.' report 4

tc .ne 2 Govern ~ent of lower Saxony, Federal Republic cf Germany, as par. cf the

'Gorleben International Review," February 1979 e a-- = n- W

_s.

.=.-

?c -s (Cast'd_):..

~e Safet;y Research at the Large Consequence End of the Risk Spectrum,"

. .. preserad to the Experts' Heeting on Reactor Safe.ty' Research in tha Federal

. ;E;Pdifc of Germany, Bonn, September I,1978.

A Stx*v of h of the Consecuences of Hycothetical Reactor Accidents at Ea-s= 7-. reper; to the Swedish Energy Co=nssion Stocknolm, DS 1 1978:5,

-arr.aa-y 1978. . __ _

h ^.: n ....

'E: E !.: .se aen:es cf Catastrc: hic l t:idents at :ndian Point anc ineir

. P:. arises fer E=ergency Planning," testimony anc cross-examination before the I.:Cler- Feg la = y Ca=nissicn's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, en behalf of

.e .a.: hart 5:a e AIwrrey General anc ::ners, July 1982.

"'Ir. :he Parter cf A plication of C-angt and Rockiand Counties, Inc. for br-wsi:r.  : Cosi of Lcvett Units 4 ar.d 5, testi..onj and cress-examination on

.e 'aml:1 icac s of eliminatinc scrunners as a recuirerent for conversion to

=50: :e ar : e.-t :f Environmental Resources 5:ste ci :;ew York, ricvember 5,1981.

• m. :- ec s for C==,erciai ;ucle ar Dower ir. The United States," before l's I__~. _ .-:-_es c= Eversight and Inves ti ga .i ors , Cc"-i ttee on Interior and

E:ia - E .'hs, U 5. r ieuse of Representatives , Oc:cter 23. 1981.

5 . k::ilf:g crf Potassie= 1odice for tne General Fut.1ic as a Condition for.

b c  :" 7EI 1::it2:3. 1," testimony and cross-exacination before the Atomic' 5Ef H7 Erd Utensi=g Board on behalf of the Anti-!;uclear Group Representing isrt,. April 3961. ._

. dice at:d Rh.wncations Concerning Chances in Reactor Design and Safety 4.a sis P..i= 5:s:Af l .e_Recui red ir. Li;'.: r of the Acci ent at inree M.ile Island,"

~

snes.ent = cae R.sclear Regulatory Cor-ission concerning the proposed rulemaking

.ca:iss c: degrzsed cores, December 29, 1980.

"~~i

.- ernztives is the Indian Point !!uclear Reactors," Statement before the l En-i ... - =. cal :7..ec-ic Co.....ittee of the i;ew York Ci ty Ccuncil , December 14, 1979.

l Es= :.efc s ~_M Littee, "The I= pact on f;ew Ycrk City of Reactor Accidents at bdNan Pcisst," 2:ne 11,1979 Also " Consequences of a Catastrophic Reactor A:=i/=~ ." w t to the Hew York City Board of Health, August 12, 1976 (with F7-* ves: feippe1).

Ew-: . lan. int for a Catastrophic Reacter accicent," Testimony before l re Calif. ~ia Emery.y Resources and Development Coeission, Emergency Response a: E =-*=ri:n : ans F. earings, Nove ber 4, 1975, Page 171 5 c -'s- Effe::s Of a:as trcphic accicer.:s en Ec ..u :ities Sur-cu-c'ng tne l 1 :sse- .se:iear Installation," testiecr.y be fore :ne Califernia Energy Resources 2_: ".s reir:mme=t er-issier., December 3,1976.

.-' meeter.:ss :f Catas trechic Accicents at James: r . " Testimeey re'_ -e:a se.c : - < State Ecard on Electric Genera: ice Sit ng and the Enn onment i i- -14 Ma ter cf I.c .9 Island Lighting Comsany (Jawsocr- !4uclear Power I .Iri:r_ Lv.i s : an: 2),P.a.. 1977.

l i

. . . . . g.

e

- . ; .h_-5 .' -

{

MiMaseoes- _-- h- - .-

• r'mts on WASH 1400 " Statement to the Subcommittee on Eneroy and the w Oversloht Hearinos on Reactor-Safety.' June 11, 1976, Serial No. 94-61,

{']_ _

..M O

e g

~---._ ,

P e

9 e

• G .

a-e 0

l e

O 1

l l

l I

d 00LKE1ED USNE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

'83 97 16 21:53 I, Jo Ann Shotwell, Esquire, counsel for Massachusetts Attorney l General Francis X. Bellotti, hereby certify th4tagnose ember 9, 1983, I  ;

rade service of the Motion of Attorney GeneralInfl SEF dE'-

Reconsideration of Board Ruling Re Examination of P q' ration Time, Ection of Attorney General Francis X. Bellotti For Clarification of Board order Dated August 30, 1983 and Contention of Attorney General Francis X.

Bellotti Relative to Emergency Planning For New Hampshire Beach Cc:2a-izies by nailing copies thereof, postage prepaid, to the parties camed below:

Eelen Hoyt, Chairperson

• Rep. Beverly Hollingworth Atatic Safety and Licensing Coastal. Chamber of Commerce 3 card Panel 209 Winnacunnet Road C.5. Fuclear Regulatory Commission Hampton,'NH 03842 Washington, DC 20555 Cr. Immeth A. Luebke* William S. Jordan, III, Esquire At:mic Safety and Licensing Diane Curran Board Panel Harmon & Weiss C.S. Euclear Regulatory Commission 1725 I Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20555 Suite 506 Washington, DC 20006 D r. Jerry Earbour* Edward L.- Cross, Jr., Esquire Atcmic Safety and Licensing Assistant Attorney General Soard Panel Dana Bisbee, Csquire

,U.S. Naclear Regulatory Commission Assistant Attorney General Washington, DC 20555 Office of the Attorney General 208 State House Annex .

Concord, NH 03301 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Roy P. Lessy, Jr., Esquire

• Eoard Panel David A. Repka, Esquire

• U.S. Naclear Regulatory Commission Robert G. Perlis, Esquire

• Washington, DC 20555 Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

• Ey Erpress Mail

-, * + ~ , - ,,,e . , - , - - -, r,- _ , - = -

, c-,,- -.-,--,,r---e,-., , ,,3+- 4 .-,en- - , , - , - - = ,

r \

a Atonic Safety and Licensing Robert A. Backus, Esquire Board Panel

• 116 Lowell Street C.S. Euclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 516 Washirston, DC 20555 Manchester, NH 03105 Philip Ahrens, Esquire Dr. Mauray Tye Assistant Attorney General Sun Valley Association Department of the Attorney 209 Summer Street General Haverhill, MA 01830 Augusta, ME 04333 a7id R. Lewis

• Thomas G. Dignan, Jr., Esquire **

Atomic Safety and Licensing Robert K. Gad, III, Esquire **

Soard Panel Ropes & Gray C .3. Suclear Regulatory Commission 225 Franklin Street E=. 3/W-439 Boston, MA 02110

~4ashirgron, DC 20555 Er. Jchn B. Tanzer Ms. Olive L. Tash Eesigrated Representative of Designated Representative of the Town of Hampton the Town of Brentwood 5 Morningside Drive R.F.D. 1, Dalton Road Earp:cn, NE 03042 Brentwood, NH 03833 Roberta C. Pevear Edward F. Meany Designated Representative of Designated Representative of the Town of Hampton Falls the Town of Rye Drinkwater Road 155 Washington Road Earpten Falls, NH 03844 Rye, NH 03870 W-= cacdra Gavutis Calvin A. Canney Designated Representative of City Manager rhe Town of Kensington City Hall Er3 'l 126 Daniel Street l East Eings ton , NH 03827 Portsmouth, NH 03801 ,

i ratrick J. McKeon Jane Doughty Selectmen's Of fice Field Director I

10 Central Road Seacoast Anti-Pollution League

! Rye, N3 03870 5 Market Street Portsmouth, NH 03801 Richard I. Sullivan, Mayor Docketing and Service Section l

Town Hall Office of the Secretary Newbc ryport , KA 01950 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

• Ey Izpress Mail

• • 3y Hand Delivery on 9/12/83 1

i r

e Brian P. Cassidy Representative Nicholas J. Costel l Regional Counsel 1st Essex District l FEMA Region 1 Whitehall Road John W. McCormack Post Office Amesbury, MA 01913

& Courthouse Boston, MA. 02109 Mr. Angie Machiros, Chairman Diana P. Randall Newbury Board of Selectmen 70 Collins Street Town of Newbury, MA 01950 Seabrook, NH 03874 Patrick J. McKeon Anne Verge, Chairperson Chairman of Selectmen, Rye, Board of Selectmen New Hampshire Town Hall 10 Central Road South Hampton, NH 03842 Rye, NH 03870 Donald E. Chick Maynard B. Pearson Town Manager Board of Selectmen Town of Exeter 40 Monroe Street 10 Front Street Amesbury, MA 01913 New Hampshire 03833 Selectmen of North Hampton Mr. Daniel Girard Town of North Hampton Civil Defense Director New Hampshire 03862 25 Washington Street Salisbury, MA 01930 Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Senator Gordon J. Humphrey 1 Pillsbury Street U.S. Senate Concord, NE 03302 Washington, D.C. 20510 (Attn: Berb Boynton) (Attn: Tom Burack)

Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury, this 9th day of September, 1983.

/

~

A/ Ann Shotwell Wssistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Divisior Public Protection Bureau One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 1

_ .- -- .