ML20058F159
| ML20058F159 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1982 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20058A387 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-82-206 NUDOCS 8207300310 | |
| Download: ML20058F159 (56) | |
See also: IR 05000358/1981013
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.. .. . . . . . . _ - -_ _ _ _ ' f) , ' ! .[] 4 I)
05/07/A2' PEGION III TRACvlN3 SYSTEh C' PAGE 1 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-338/81-13 IN RESPONSE To G.A.P.FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING ,) RESOLUTION ,) ITEM y , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPC'/ FACILITY NAMP LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSCOUT ') DESIONATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT N0. I RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION 9 ._ f 358/81-13-01 VIOLATION SEVERITY LEVEL 2 ZIMMER . ' 12/24/81 CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50e' APPENDIX R. CRITERION II THE LICENSEE ') , ( AND ITS CONTRACTcRS DID NOT ADEQUATELY DOCUMENT AND IMPLEMENT A QUALITY ASSU%AN CE PROGRAM AS EVIDENCED BY THE FOLLOWING ERAMPLES: , ( CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX Be CRITERION XV, REPORTS REVIEWED WERE NOT PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE PROCEDURE ) ( (QACMI G-4) ESTABLISHED EDR PROCESSING NRS. ADDITIONAL EXAMPLES AfE BEING TRACKED AS'0 PEN ITEMS. ITEM - ') ( NUMBERS 358/R1-13-05 -11,-12.-13.-14.-17 -19,-21e-23e-24. =2Se-2To-28e=29e-30,-31,-32e-35eAND -37. ') - , C . 358/81-13-02 VIOLATION SEVERITY LEVEL 3 ZIMMER ') . 12/24/81 (- CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50e APPENDIX He CRITERION XVII, REPORTS REVIEWED WERE. FALSE ANO DID NOT F URNISH EVIDENCE OF ACTIVITIES AFFECTING QUALITY. AN ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE IS BEING TRACKED AS 9 l ( OPEN ITFM NO. 358/81-13-06. 9 (' 358/81-13=03 UNRESOLVED ITEM .ZIMMER OURING THE DETAILED REVIEW OF NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS E-166te ') . ( E-1662, AND E-Pa66e THE INSPECTORS QUESTIONED WHETHER OR NOT THE LICENSEE WAS MEETING THE COMMITMENT DOCUMENTED IN IE INSPECTION REPORT 50-358/90-05, PARAGRAPH 6e FOR 1005 '3 C' 4EINSPECTION BY KAISER QC INSPECTOReS OF ALL INSTALLED HANGERS AND RESTRAINTS. () . . =- (. - g 358/81-13-04 UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER D- C3 (I J O c. b THF. ACCEPTARILITY OF TORCH CUTTING ROLT' HOLES ITHE 0 ! APPLICARILITY OF At:SI STANDARD N45.2.5 PROHIBITING RURNING C) 0F ROLT HOLESS IS UNRESOLVED AND WILL BE REVIEWED DURING A (h g q) l' SUBSEQUFNT INSPECTION. O O N a i GD n<m Cs Cb- CD , ( OO uj nu.z O n- ~ O O tr > WC3hJ Q m a.C h a _ d% 4 }() ' 5 'd D
.. - , . . .. . . .. __ - ' C) I b, y ' _ () , O
C) 05/07/82 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM O PAIE 2 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE 10 0.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPUTER PRINT 0UT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 9 COMPLETE LISTING O RESOLUTION 11EM (' FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT - I) ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. I( ! CESPONSE DUE MODULE No. BRIEF OESCRIPTION 3 _ ZIMMER OPEN' ITEM I' 358/81-13-05 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/61-13-01. ') I CONTRARY 70 10 CFR 50. APPENDIX 0, CRITERION XVIe AND THE WM. H. ZIMMER QA MANUAL, SECTION 16.1 FAILURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE .) THAT INSPECTIONS CORRECTIVE ACTION FOLLOWING THE DETrRMINATION 'rFORMED ON MORE THAN 400 ,( FOR PROPER PIPE FITUp HAD NOT 8:*9 5 SOCKET WELDS (SECTION A.3.3 6.1), ann talLURE TO TAKE ADEQUATE l 3 l CORRECTIVE ACTION FOLL0d!NG THE DETERNINATION THAT THE lf IN-PROCESS INSPECTIONS FOR WELD FILLER METAL TRACEA8ILITYe WELDER IDENTIFICATION, AND WELDiaG DATES FOR 22 WELDS (SECTION I l 4.3.3.6.31 HAD NOT BEEN PERFORMED. ' , l' ( ') OPEN ITEM ZIMMER - 358/81-13-06 l f- 12/24/81 ADDI(IONAL EXAMPLES OF VIOLATION ITEM NO.,359/81-13-02. A. CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIK Re CRITERION XVIIe FALSE 3 RECORDS IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 4.3-1 FAILE0 TO FURNISH II EVIDENCE OF MATERIAL TRACEABILITY FOR THE PIPING COMPONENTS 8. CONTRARY 70 10 CFR 50. APPENolx Re CRITERION XVII THE PIPE II ' (' ACTUALLY INSTALLED FOR LINE IDG-11-AA*3 WAS CONSPICOUOUSLY (CLASS 01. THIS IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF A , COLOR-CODED VELLOW FALSE RECORD WHICH FAILED TO FURNISH EVIDENCE OF MATERIAL ') , TRACEABILTlY FOR PIPING COMPONENTS. I O ZIMMFR ' L 555/81-13-07 OPEN ITEM INUIVIDUAL F SAID HE KNOW OF CASES IN ""ICH " HALF-LIFEe GI I (3000-LR IN FLACE OF 6000=LRI FITTINGS WERE USED. TWO SPECIFIC CASES RECALLED BY INDIVIDUAL F WILL RE FOLLOWED UP IN A SUBSEQUENT INSPECTION. ( . UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER 358/81-13-08 THE FINAL QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINFER'S REVIEW OF THE PROCEEDING WFLD CATE RECORDS HAD NOT BEEN PREFORMED AS OF 6/29/81. GI KEI-I THE LISTED EXCEPTIONS ARE UNRESOLVED PENDING THE (> TMEREFOREe FINAL QA ENGINFEReS REVIEW AND COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE " C) OISPOSITIOr>S. O L ' . N . .. . ()_-_-_--__ --__-_
_ _. $ _ . -. . . , 7: () - i, 9 9
. g C' -
- 1
- . ,3 o ( l l
- )
C' PAGE 3 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IF REPORT NO. 50-354/81-13 IN RESRONSE TO O.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF OA/20/m2 , COMPLETE LISTING ,. 3 RESOLUTION ITEM ,.) . g3 ~ ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPf/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT ') C EESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIONATED NO. INSRECTION ASSIONED REPORT NO. . ') C' 358/81-13-09 OPEN ITEM ZIMMFR Rill WILL' DETERMINE THE STATUS OF THE REMAINING IT DRAINS PRIOR ') ! C' TO PLANT OPERATION. l ') ' (' 358/81-13-10 UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER THERE APPEARED TO BE SOME INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE TIMECARDS ) . (* AND THE WELD R00 ISSUE FORMS THAT wERE REVIEWED. REGION III , INSPECTORS DISCUSSED THE APPARENT INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE i i LICENSEE. THF CGLE QA MANAGER INDICATED THAT NRC DID NOT REVIEW '3 ' C ALL OF THE TIMFCARDS. ON 10/8/81, THE LICENSEE PROVIDED i ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO THE RIII INSPECTORS. THIS IS l CONSIDERED TO BE AN UNRESOLVED ITEM PENDING REVIEW OF '
- )
(. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ' 9 C 358/81-13-11 OP2N ITEM ZIMMER , 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. (I (' CONTRARY TO 10 CFR Soo CRITERION XIe AND THE WM. H ZIMMER QA ' MANUAL SECTION 11.2, THE INSUFFICIENT SHIMMING OF THE PENETRAMETER IN HADIOGRAPHS OF THE NOTED WELDS. , i i 358/81-13-12 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER CI l ( 12/24/81 - ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM No.-358/81-13-01.
! CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50s APPENDIX Be CRITERION XVIe AND THE WM. (I l (- H. ZIMMER QA MANUAL, SECTION IS, UNACCEPTABLE WELDS IDENTIFIED 3 ON HANGERS 70HFEC165e ISH2FECIT5, 14HilFECl46, AND 16HIFEC156 WERE NOT CONTROLLED IN ANY QA DOCUMENT. ,f 358/81-13-13 OPEN ITFM ZIMMER (I () 12/24/81 . J ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50. APPENDIX Be CRITERION Xe AND THE WM. H. OI () ZIMMER LA MANUALe SECTI'ON 10.1.2. LACK OF IN-PROCESS AND ' ADEQUATE FINAL INSPECTIONS OF THE AROVE FIELD AND VENDOR HANGER WELDS. . 4D se
m M O (' 1 h t - I) ') C ') 05/07/82 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM (* PAGE 4 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-35A/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 9 COMPLETE LISTING (, __ RESOLUTION f) ITEM < l {' ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT r) l DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT h0. ( RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF OESCRIPTION 1 . OPEN ITEM ZIMMER f 358/81-13-14 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01.
( CONTHARY TO 10 CFR 50. APPENDIX He CRITERION IIIe THE WM. H. ZIMMER FSAR, TARLE 3.8.2. AND THE WM. H. ZIMMER.QA MANUAL SECTION 3.3e DEVIATIONS FROM THE AWS CODE. O C 358/81-13-15 UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER . SURVEILLANCE REPORT (SR) NO.2R93 DATF0 1/8/81, WHICH STATED _ THAT 94 0F 179 (SUPERSTRUT) CABLE TRAY HANGERS IN THE CARLE ') (I SPREADING ROOM HAVE ONE OR BOTH FOOT CONNECTIONSJC0VERED WITH ' FI REPROFFING. THE SR REQUESTED CLARIFICATION AS TO WHAT QC SHOULD DO SINCE THE FOOT CONNECTIONS HAD NOT BEEN INSPECTED. (I AS OF 4/27/81e THE SR HAD NO DISPOSITION. THIS ITEH IS UNRESOLVED PENDING RESOLUTION OF SR NO. 2893 AND ACTION TO RESOLVE OTHER HANGER CONNECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE THE PLANT THAT WERE COVERED PEFORE THEY WERE INSPECTED. . , II , - ( ZIMMER 358/81-13-16 UNRESOLVED, ITEM ' TRAY NODES WITH A DI OVER 1.0 HAVE To BE RE-EVALUATED - CONSIDERING THE INCREASED DEPTHS. THIS ITEM IS UNRESOLVED PENDING COMPLETION OF THE RE-EVALUATIONS. -__ 358/81-13-17 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER %) , k 12/74/81 j A00!TIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. . ('- CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX Be CRITERION III, AND THE WM. kJ N. ZIMMER QA HANUALs SECTION 3 6. THE DESIGN 8 ASIS FOR CABLE AMPACITY WAS A DEVIATION FROM THE DESIGN (FSAR) AND WAS NOT IDENTIFIED ON ANY CONTROL DOCUMENT. G O O GW i v me ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ,. 1 f) T (? . ) , (
- )
'I /*3E 5 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82
- )
COMPUTER PRINT 0UT PELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RFSPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/a2 , COMPLETE LISTING , , ITEM RESOLUTION , , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT . (' . RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. ') C' 358/81-13-10 UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER , ') THERMAL CALCULATIONS (ROTH ALLOWARLE AND ACTUAll WILL BE ') I PERFORMED IN THE NEAR FUTURE TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH . AMPACITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL POWER TRAYS WITH A DI OVER 1.25. THESE CALCULATIONS WILL RE PROVIDED To NRC REGION III. THIS I) ( ITEM IS UNRESOLOVED.. . O 358/81-13-19 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER ') 12/24/81 ~ ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. CI CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50. APPENDIX B CRITERION IIIe AND THE WM. ') , H. ZIMMER QA MANUAL SECTION 3.11.2. LACK OF DESIGN CONTROL ' MEASURES TO VERIFY THE ADEQUACY OF THE TMERMAL LOADING OF ') (I POWER SLEEVES AND THE PHYSICAL LOADING OF TRAYS. OI ( 358/81-13-20 UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER THE RIII INSPECTOR REQUESTED JUSTIFICATION FOR USING THE DESIGN (I INDEX PROGRAM FOR THE DETERMINING FACTOR FOR PHYSICAL LOADS SINCE THE DESIGN INDEX PROGRAM HAD ARSOLUTELY NO RELATION TO PMYSICAL WEIGHT. THE REGION III INSPECTOR ALSO REQUESTED ')' JUSTIFICATION FOR USING THE DESIGN INDEX OF 1.25 AS THE DETERMINING LIMIT- FOR PERFORMING r.ESIGN CALCULATIONS. THIS ITEM IS UNRESOLVED PENDING EVALUATION OF THE 3 l' JUSTIFICATION FOR USING A DESIGN INDEX PROGRAM. ' I) 358/81-13-21 OPEN-ITEM ZIMMER 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. \\ E) () CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX Be CRITERION IIIe AND THE WM. H. ZIMMER QA MANUAle SECTION 3.6e A CONTROL PROGRAM DID NOT EXIST FOR SUCH DESIGN DEVIATIONS WHEN IDENTIFIED BY SAL } 5) ENGINEERS. , G) G) C) \\J m $ . . . . . . . . . . . i
1 - ' O O i . .4 , () ~
- )
, (% ') PAGE '6 REGION !!! TRACKING 5YSTEM 05/07/82
- 3
COMPUTER PRINT 0UT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-358/R1-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , .. . ITEM RESOLUTION g) _ !?SM NO./ INSPECT 0P/ ITFM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT ( 4sSPONSE DUE MODULE NO. 8HIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. .NSPECTION ASSIGNED REPOR' No. ') . _ _ _ _ . . .
- )
f' 3S8/81-13-22 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER SILTING AND PUMP IMPELLER WEAR CONDITIONSe ALONG WITH THE
- )
I MEASURES TO CORRECT THESE CONDITIONS, ARE DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX ' J OF THF WM. H. ZIMMER FSAR, REVISION 64e DATED 12/1980. REGION III CONSIDERES THIS 70 BE AN OPEN ITEM PENDING 5) ( COMPLETION OF THE CORRECTIVE MEASURES DESCRIBED IN THE WM. H. ZIMMER FSAR. APPENDIX J. REVISION 69. DATED 12/1980. f 13 358/81-13-23 'OPEN ITEM ZIMMER ') I ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE Or. VIOLATION ITEN NO. 358/81-13-01. CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50. APPENDIX R. CRITERION IIIe AND THE hM. H. ZIMMER 04 MANUAL, SECTIONS 3.3 AND 3 13.1 EXAMPLES OF WELD ( INSPECTION CRITERIA BEING DELETED AND BEING DESIGNATED AS NOT 5) APPLICABLE ON WELD INSPECTION FORuS USED ROUTINELY TO INSPECT ' WELOS. , 3S8/81-13-24 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER () C' 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM No. 358/81-13-01. CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX B, CRITERION Ve AND THE WM. H. () E' ZIMMER QA MANUAL, SECTION 15.9 NONCONFORMING ITEMS ACCEPTED IN SRS 2899, 2903. AND 2914 REPRESENT CHANGES 70 THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. TME 30 DAY PERIOD SPECIFIED IN INSTRUCTION QAMCI G-14e II I' REVISION 3 IN ESSENCE, PERMITTED NONCONFORMING ITEMS TO BE ' DISPOSITIONED WITHOUT DESIGN CONTROL MEASURES COMMENSURATE WITH THOSE APPLIED TO THE ORIGINAL DESIGN IF THE SR WAS . () I? DISPOSITIONED WITHOUT REING TRANSFF RRED TO AN NR. () Id 358/81-13-25 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. (k. I) CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50. CRITERION V AND THE WM. H. ZIMMER QA ' HANUAL, SECTION 5, INPROCESS NONCONFORMANCES IDENTIFIED ON SAS F-2909, F-30Too F-30Tle F-30T2e F-30TA, F-30T5e F-30T6, kI 5) F-3083. AND F-T019. WERE NOT DISPOSITIONED OR ACCEPTARLY ' CORRECTED AS or 8/12/81. AND WERE NOT TRANSFERRED TO NRS , , WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS. b .
_ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ,
1 4 ( ) .- c' ') PAGE 7 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE PEPORT No. 50-35R/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. F0IA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , ITEM RESOLUTION ,. ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT (' RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO, INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') f' 358/81-13-26 UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER ') C.' NO MEASURES EXISTED TO ASSURE THAT ALL OF THE REQUIRED QA INSPECTIONS RELATED TO DOCS (E.G. WELDER QUALIFICATION, ') PROPER FILLER METAL. TRACEABILITY OF HATERIALSe ETC.) WOULD . BE PERFORMED. THIS CONDITION WAS PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED IN IE (' REPORT NO. 354/80-15-04 THIS ITEH IS UNRESOLVED PENDING THE '3 COMPLETE RESOLUTION OF IE ITEM NO 354/80-15=04 ( - () 358/81-13-27 OPEN ITEM' ZIMMER
12/24/81 ( ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO.*35R/81-13-01. ') , CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX 0. CRITERION XVIe A.D THE WM. H. ZIMMER QA MANUAL, SECTION 15.2.2, FAILURE TO CONTROL '3 (.' UNACCEPTABLE WELOS ON NINE BEAMS, FIVE REAMS WITH ' UNACCEPTABLE RE-ENTRANT COURNERSe AND THE FOUR BEAMS THAT WERE INSTALLED AND NOT IDENTIFIED AS A REQUIREMENT ON ANY DESIGN () -( 00CUMENT. _ () ( 358/81-13-28 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER 12/14/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01 ( CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50s APPENDIX B, CRITERION VIII, AND THE WM. () H. ZIMMER OA MANUAle SECTION 8.2, FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THE- TRACEABILITY OF THE NINE STRUCTURAL REAMS ADDRESSED IN SECTION . N) (' T,1.1 AND T.1 2. () (* 358/81-13-29 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER 12/24/41 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM No. 3S8/81-13-01. $} (.# CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX He CRITERION VII, AND THE WM. M. ZIMMER QA MANUAL. SECTION T.3.le FAILURE TO ASSES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE CONTROLS TO ASSURE THE QUALITY OF THE , (I 5) HILL CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STRUCTURAL HANGER BEAMS SUPPLIED BY THE AHOVE VENDORS. () Gb ' (; C) 1jO e
. . - _ _ - _ . S' l' (N () ss () ) , C' ') . f PAGE a . REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82
- )
COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-35A/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO O.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , ITEM RESOLUTION , . ITEM NO,/ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT I RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED N0. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') - ) 0 358/81-13-30 'OPEN ITEM ZIMMER 12/2A/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. f CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50. APPENDIX He CRITERION XVII AND THE WM. CI H. ZIMMER QA MANUALe SECTION 17.1.1 THE BRISTOL STEEL AND IRON WORKS, INC. QC INSPECTOR FAILED TO DOCUMENT DETAILS OF HIS I INSPECTIONS SUCH AS THE WELDING MATERIALS (ROD TYPE) USEDe CI THE WELDER, THE SPECIFIC WELD ACTIVITIES INSPECTEDe AND/OR WOLTING OR WELDING PROCEDURE NUMBER WHEN APPLICABLE. gy 358/81-13-31 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER ') C 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX Be CRITERION IIIe AND THE WM. ') E' ' H. ZIMMER QA MANUAL. SECTION 3.1 AND 3.6e THE INSTALLED CONDITIONS IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPH le 26 AND A 0F T.2.2 APPARENTLY RESULTED FROM DESIGNS THAT DEVIATED FROM THE FSAR. ,. 358/81-13-32 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER CI I' 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01 CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50. APPENDIX Be CRITERION X AND THE WM. H. II ( ZIMMER QA MANUAL, SECTION 10.1.2e THE LACK OF QC INSPECTION FOR THE INSTALLED CONDITION IN PARAGRAPH 3. f3 () 358/81-13-33 OPEN ITEM ZIMMER (' HISROUTED CABLE APPARENTLY RESULTED FROM CONSTRUCTION (I , . ACTIVITIES FOR WHICH THE FSAR DOES NOT REQUIRE QC INSPECTION ! -(# SEPARATION AND THE TRAY LOADING AND. THEREFOREe WILL HAVE VERIFICATION. THE MISROUTED CAHLE DOES INFLUENCE CABLE 5} , ( TO BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSITIONEO. THIS ITEM IS CONSIDERED i ' , OPEN AND WILL RE REVIEWED DURING A SURSEQUENT INSPECTION. Le C) l l (; () . ! %) u, () - 55., -- tr
, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __ .. _ _ _ _ __. _ , - . . ., 4 % (' ) O ' PAGE 9 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RFLATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-35R/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/?O/R2 s COMPLETE LISTING . ITEM RESOLUTION p ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR . CLOSEOUT I RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED ' REPORT NO. 9 3 C' 358/81-13-34 UNRESOLVED ITEM ZIMMER THE LICENSEE STATED THAT THE DESIGN IDENTIFIED ON DRAWING 3 ( NO.E-98-FB WAS BEING RECONSIDERED FOR ALTERATIONS. THIS ITEM IS UNRESOLVED PENDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FINAL SEPARATION DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR CA8LE RISERS IN THE CABLE SPREADING O ( ROOM. b 358/81-13-35 ~OPEN ITEM ZIM'HER 9 ' ' 12/24/81 I - ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM NO. 358/81-13-01. O CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX.B, CRIIERION XVIII, AND THE WM. H. ZIMMER QA MANUAL, SECTION 18.1, FAILURE BY CGLE To PERFORM AN AUDIT TO DETERMINE.THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SLL 3 ( NONCONFORMANCE PROGRAM DURING THE PAST 9 YEARS. . ___ 3 ( 358/81-13-36 UNRES1LVED ITEM ZIMMER THE A'DITS APPEARED TO IDENTIFY ADVERSE FINDINGS FOR WHICH U 9 I THERE WERE NO CORRECTIVE ACTION TAMEN OR FOLLOWUP AUDITS. THIS PATTER IS UNRESOLVED PENDING A RE-REVIEW BY CGLE OF THEIR PAST AUDITS OF SLL, GE, H. J. KAISER AND FOUR CGLE INTERNAL 0 O DEPARTMdNTS. , C 0 358/81-13-3T OPEN ITFM ZIMMER 12/24/81 ADDITIONAL EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION ITEM No. 358/81-13-01. , U O CONTRARY TO 10 CFR 50, APPENDIX Ho CRITERION XVI AND THE WM. H. ZIMME R QA MANUAL, SECTION 16.5, NONE OF THE AUDITS OR CORRECTIVE ACTION INSTITUTED ADDRESSED THE GENERIC AND O PROGRAMMATIC CAUSE OF DESIGN CALCULATIONS, REVIEWS, AND d VFRIFICATIONS NOT BEING PERFORMED TO PRECLUDE REPETITION. . FAILURE TO DETFRMINE THE CAUSE AND TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION O O TO PRECLUDE REPETITION, b Q O . a O .g ._
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . O e 5 h
9 . \\ O PAGE 10 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM OS/07/82 ') COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/n1-13 IN RESPONSE TO 8.4.P. FOIA REQUEST OF OA/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING RESOLUTION l ITEM ) ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT i ') l I RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIONATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ) I 358/81-13-3a VIOLATION SEVERITY LF. VEL 3 ZIMMER - 12/2A/81 CONTRARY TO 10 CFR S0. APPENDIX 8e CRITERION I AND THE WM. I) f H. ZIMMER QA MANUAL, SECTION 1.2.A. THE THREATENED FIRING OF i l THE QC INSPECTOR WAS A FORM OF HARASSMENT / INTIMIDATION AND IS AN. EXAMPLE OF LACK OF SUFFICIENT FREEDOM OF QC INSPECTORS. , l SEE NOTE ' 398/81801-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER ) ALL ECHELONS OF KAISER ENGINEERING PERSONNEL. EMPHASIZED PRODUCTION AND BARELY TOLERATED THE QA PROGRAM AND ITS ) ( INSPECTORS. THERE WAS NO COOPERATION RETWEEN CRAFT PERSON- NEL AND QC INSPECTORS SINCE THE INSPECTORS RECEIVED MINIMUM RESPECT AND WERE CONSTANTLY BEING CHALLENGED REGARDING THEIR
- )
( INSPECTION FINDINGS. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT S0-35R/Rl-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. _ SEE' NOTE 358/81801-02 ALLEGATIbn ZIMMER DUE TO THE INFLUFNCE OF KAISER ENGINEERING DVER THE 04 PROGRAM IT WAS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT FOR HIM TO INITIATE A NON- O' I' CONFORHANCE REPORT (NCR). HE EXPLAINED THAT PRIOR TO PER- PARING AN NCRe NE WAS REQUIRED TO 91SCUSS THE SITUATION WITH H1S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, A KAISER EMPLOYEE. O' I' IF CONCURRED WITH TME NECESSITY OF PREPARING AN NCRe HE GAVE HIH AN NCR FORM AND ASSIGNED A CONTROL NUMBER TO
THE NCR. HE SUBMITTED VERY FEW NCReS SINCE e O e THE QA MANAGER, AND OTHER KAISER PERSONNEL DIS- I' AGREED WITH MANY OF HIS FINDINGS. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). O O COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. 9 O 0 v - O . Z . rw
1- ._ (' % ?) s O O . l' 'l b PAGE 11 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 , COMPLETE LISTING ' IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPUTER PRIN, TOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 ITEM . RESOLUTION 3 ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSRECTOR CLOSE0UT f CESPONSE DUE' MODULE No. RRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ) C 358/81#01-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I HE ADVISED THAT WHEN'HIS PROPOSED NCR WAS DISAPPROVED EITHER C' THE DEFICIENCY WAS NOT CORRECTED OR IT WAS HANDLED INFORMALLY, CI BY IN-HOUSE DOCUMENTS WITH NO ACCOUNTABILITTe IDENTIFIED AS HANGER INSPECTION OR SURVEILLANCE FORMS. (N. ANNA) (' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-354/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). OI COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. C (I _ ~ 358/81#01-06 ALLEGATI04 ZIMMER ~ SEE NOTE I) APPR0x!MATELY TWENTY OF THIRTY ELECTRILAL WELDS WHICH I INSPECTED f) WERE DEFICIENT. -HOWEVER.- e QA MANAGERe AND SEVERAL OTHER MAISER PERSONNEL LOOKED AT THE' WELDS AND DIS- ') . II AGREEDED WITH ME. NO NCR WAS WRITTEN AND THE WELDS WERE NOT CORRECTED. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). (E COVERED BY IAL' PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. CI (E 358/81#01-08 ALLEGATION ZIMMER LEE NOTE 'I s THERE WERE MANY INSTANCES WMERE I AND OTHER QC INSPECTORS WERE () I? ASKED Yn INSPECT WELDS WITH ZINC RICH COATING (ZRC) PAINT. HOWEVER, WE COULDN'T 00 THIS SINCE IT WAS NOT ALLOWED. (N. ANNA) I' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/a1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). C) COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. (- \\) ~ 358/81801-09 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE E) Ib I RECALL OBSERVING A 100 FT RUN OF 3 INCH PIPE IN A 8AITERY ROOM WHICH HAD NO REQUIRED SUPPORTS OR HANGERS. THIS WAS $1MPLY WRITTEN UP BY ME ON A SURVEILLANCE FORM RATHER THAN k) AN NCR. I DO NOT MNOW WHETHER IT WAS CORRECTED. (N. ANNA)' () COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. (> () i . ' () es Qb L~:
y .. . \\ (% % () i s (5
- )
(' ) - . s I' PAGE 12 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 'l COMPUTER PRINT 0UT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-359/R1-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. .FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , . . ITEM RESOLUTION - ,) ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT
f RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') I 358/81802-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 'l ' KAISER RELEASED ALL SHOPPERS AND OFFERED TO HIRE MANY OF THE I QC INSPECTORS AS DIRECT EMPLOYEES OF MAISER. HE ASSUMED THAT C) THIS WAS PROMPTED BY NAISER'S DESIRE TO HAVE MORE CONTROL OVER
' THE QA PROGRAM. (N. ANNA) i ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). () , I 358/81#02-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE () HE EXPRESSED A LACK OF CONFIDENCE IN THE ENTIRE QA PROGRAM II AT ZIMMER. MANY IMPORTANT AREAS ARE NOT COVERED BY THE QA CD PROG 1AM. QUALIFICATION CRITERIA FOR CRAFT PERSONNEL ARE VERY COMPLEX AND CONFUSING AND THE SPECIAL PROCESS PROCEDURE MANUAL II PREPARED BY KAISER IS VERY VAGUE AND POORLY WRITTEN. (N. ANNA) 3 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/41-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. , 358/81802-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE HE NOTED THAT MANY NON-CONFORMANCE REPORTS (NCR) PREPARED BY HIM AND OTHER QC INSPECTORS WERE EITHER VOIDED OR ANNOTATED bI i ( " ACCEPT AS IS" WITHOUT ADEQUATE JUSTIFICATION OR EXPLANATION. (N. ANNA) ' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). (I (' COVERED RY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. . ( 358/81802-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE () HE REMARKED THAT , QA MANAGER, e (I t l DOCUMENT REVIEW MANAGER, AND OTHER CRAFT PERSONNEL WERE VERY DEMANDING IN THEIR EFFORTS TO AVOID AND CIRCUMVENT NCReS WHICH IN THEIR OPINIONS, RESilLTED FROM O/C INSPECTORS BEING OVERLY l. k) ' . CRITICAL AND TOO THOROUGH. (N. ANNA) COVEREO IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 IINVESTIGATION REPORT). , . COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. (s () ' . QJ pa- . f () ,h
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ .
- ,-
- -- , % e % (. ) (' '3 ,
. PAGE 13 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM , 04/20/82 05/0T/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/R1-13 IN RESPONSE TO 6.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF COMPLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTION , ITEM NO / INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT ( RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION yDESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') - f 358/81802-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 3 IN VIEW OF THE LACK 0F INDEPENDENCE OF THE QC INSPECTORS DUE ( TO THE INFLUENCE OF KAISER PERSONNEL AND THE' EMPHASIS BY ') KAISER ON CONSTRUCTION TO THE DETRIMENT OF QUALITY AND SAFETY, THE QA PROGRAM AT ZIMMER WAS UNABLE To FUNCTION .) ( SATISFACTORILY. (N. ANNA) ' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. . 358/81#02-0T ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE? NOTE ) HE CITED SEVERAL EXAMPLES OF QC INSPECTORS BEING HARRASSED AND INTIMADATED BY KAISER ENGINEERING PERSONNEL. HIS BROTHER , ( HAD BEEN TOLD'HY e A MAISER FOREMAN, To ACCEPT AND ') PASS A CERTAIN ITEM REQUIRING INSPECTION OR HE WOULD LOSE HIS JOB. . AND/QR ATTEMPTED TO FIRE , (. FOR ALLEGEDLY USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS To INSPECT A ') WELDI WHEREAS HE HAD ACTUALLY USED A MIRROR. CONSTRUCTION WORKERS POUREQ BUCKETS OF COLD WATER ON THE FOLLOWING QC I? INSPECTORS WHILE THEY WERE PERFORMING THEIR DUTIES: OD e e AND HE WAS AWARE OF . , NO FORMAL COMPLAINT WRITTEN REPORTe INVESTIGATION, OR DIS- (I CIPLINARY ACTION INITIATED OR RESULTING FROM THESE INCIDENTS. 6) ' (N. ANNA) . COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ) ' 358/81#02-08 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE KAISER PERSONNEL PREFERRED TO WASTE MORE TIME TRYING TO AVOID OR CIRCUMVENT AN NCR THAN TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE NCR AND 60.00T AND REPAIR THE CITED ITEM. IF THE QUALITY OF A WELD WAS -) CHALLENGED IN AN NCR, CRAFT PERSONNFL OFTEN CUT OUT THE WELD AND REPLACED IT, AND THEN VOIDED THE NCR. THEREFORE THERE l) - WAS NO FOLLOWUP OR CONTROL OVER MANY NCRfS. AL50s OFTEN NO " CUT CARDS" WERE PREPARED. IF I QUFSTIONED CRAFT PERSONNEL. THEY WOULD TELL ME IT WAS NONE OF MY BUSINESS. (N. ANNA) l) ks COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/e1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , , COVERED RY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM, ' () ss
R f ()
- iF !
q. m . ~ ' O c
.. C 9 O . O D PAGE le REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 Q' ~ COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RLSPONSE TO G.A.P. 'FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING . e ' ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT 9 ( RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO.. ( 358/81802-10 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR . SEE NOTE 9 ' IN'MY OPINION. THE ENTIRE QA PROGRAM AT ZIMMER IS IN BAD O f SHAPE. THERE IS NO QC PROGRAM IN EFFECT FOR MANY IMPORTANT AREAS. AS EXAMPLES, THERE ARE NO PROCEDURES, DAILY LOGS OF RANDOM INSPECTIONS OR ANYONE SPECIFICALLY ASSIGNED TO CHECK 9 f kHETHER PORTABLE ROD OVENS WERE MAINTAINEO AT PROPER TEMPER- ATURES OR WHETHER WELDING RODS WERE PROPERLY SEGREGATED. (N. ANNA) . ') . ' f COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM.
(+ Q 358/81802-11 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE i 9 O ' WELD' INSPECTION OF AN I-REAM LOCATED AT THE 561 FT ELEVATION
AT 315 DEGREES IN THE PRIMARY CONTAINMENT INDICATED THAT THE WELD HAD A ONF INCH WFAVE. THE NR WAS NOT ISSUED BY . 9_ s PROHIRITED INSPECTORS FROM WRITING NR'S AGAINST PRO- ' , CEDURAL hELDING VIOLATIONS. I - COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). . 9 COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. f 358/81e02-12 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE' NOTE 9 ONLY AND WERE ALLOWED TO OBTAIN CONTROL NUMBERS 0 FOR NR'S. ' O COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. l 353/81dO2-13 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE , FREQUENTLY NR'S ARE DISPOSITIONED AS VOIDED WITHOUT AN ADEQUATE
- ,
EXPLANATION OR EVALUATION BY THE ENGINEERING STAFF. NR'S O ARE BEING VOIDED BY OR A RECORDS CLERKe BOTH OF WHOM ARE NOT OUALIFIED ENGINEERS. THE NR'S THAT HAVE REEN IMPROPERLY DISPOSITIONED I HAVE PROVIDED TO . O COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVEHFD BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. J
c[O 3 .
7 . ._ 'O O ' Ie , C b O 9 . (' PAGE 15 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 9 ' COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE To hRC IE REPORT No. 50-35R/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO 8.A.P. F0IA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING ITEN RESOLUTION q , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT (* RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 9 C 358/81802-14 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9 , A PARTICULARLY SIGNIFICANT NONCONFORMANCE REPORT WAS WRITTEN 9 b JULY 3, 1980 FOR LARGE 80RE PIPE SUPPORTS IN THE DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM. THIS NR ADDRESSED TME ISSUE THAT WE WERE ASnED AND KAISER INSPECTION PROCEDURES CALLED FOR THE WELD (' TO BE FREE OF PAINT FOR INSPECTION. THIS NR WAS RETURNED 9 ' VOIDED. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). 9 C COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ( 358/81802-18 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE< NOTE 9 HE WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE FABRICATION SHOP FROM PRIMARY 9 (' CONTAINMENT FOR NIT PICKING. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ' ( @ 358/81802-19 ALLEGATION ZIMMER .SEE' NOTE I ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW CONSTRUCTION RUNS THIS SITE IS DDC @ , '
- ST12 DATED 10/2A/T5 IN WHICH NDE REQUIREMENTS WERE ELIMIN--
ATED ON FULL PENETRATION ASME WELOS. THE REASON FOR THIS l ( CHANGE-WAS " EASE OF CONSTRUCTION AND LENGTH OF TIME REQUIRED 9 i TO PERFORM NDE.a ASME REQUIRES NDE EXAMINATION OF THE TYPE OF WELOS IDENTIFIED IN THIS REPORT. l ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). 9 . l . l (. '@ , O 8 O 4 0 9 4 h N Do nen
< 3 0 (s < , cs ') ' . . ') {w 05/07/82 CD REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM
f PAGE 16 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO'NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/41-13 IN RESPONSE TO'G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82
COMPLETE LISTING , s ) l RESOLUTION ITEM C> l C ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPF/ rACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE00T ') 'I' HESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ' _
- )
SEE NOTE C 358/81#03-01 ALLEGATION ZIMHFR , NCRe5 PREPARED RY ME AND OTHER QC INSPECTORS WOULD OFTEN BE ') VOIDE D WITHOUT ANY JUSTIFICATION OR EXPLANATION. APPROXI- MATELY 20 TO 28 NCReS PREPARE 3 RY HIM WERE VOIDED. HE WOULD OFTEN BE SENT OUT TO REINSPECT AN ITEM HE HAD REJECTED EVEN THOUGH NO CORRECTIVE WORK HAD BEEN PERFORMED. HE WAS OFTEN - (I OVERRULED HY THE QA MANAGERe e WHO CLAIMED HE WAS NIT-PICKING AND PUT REMARKS.TO THAT EFFECT ON THE NCR. IF ') . WANTED AN NCR VOIDED. THE PROJECT MANAGER, . WOULD EITHER VOID IT HIMSFLF OR SEND IT BACK Tq THE'- INSPECTOR AND HAVE HIM 00 IT. (N. ANNA) ' ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. E ~ 358/81803-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE
- )
HE CLAIMED THAT THERE WAS PRESSURE FROM TO ACCEPT f
AND NOT REJECT ITEMS. IN ONE INSTANCE. HE REJECTED WELDS ON SOME HANGER RESTRAINTS, WHICH HaD BEEN REJECTED BEFORE, BY HIM
- )
. ( AND OTHER INSPECTORS. HAD SIGNED OFF ON THESE WELDS ON A PUNCH LIST AND HAD EXPECTED HIM TO SIGN OFF ON THEM 700. HE SAID HE WOULD NOT SIGN OFF ON THE WELDS AND GAVE THE PUNCH () (' LIST HACK TO (N. ANNA) . COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). s COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. SEE NOTE 358/81803-04 ALLFGATION ZIMMER MAGNIFYING 6 LASS HARASSMENT INCIDENT. (N. ANNAL COVERED IN IE REPT 50-15R/81-13 t!NVESTIGATION REPORTI. L e L. I - e ts . . O v .. , . + . . .
- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ . _ _ _ ') s . - ('
- )
C' ') , . ' PAGE 17 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82' COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO 6.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82- COMPLETE LISTING , ITEM RESOLUTION i 3 , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT f' RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION., ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') C 358/81803-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER , SEE NOTE 'l
HE INDICATED THAT HE WAS AWARE OF THE HARASSMENT OF OTHER ') b' QC INSPECTORS RY CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL. IN PARTICULARe HE RELATED THAT TWO INSPECTORS WERE THE OBJECTS OF HARRASSMENT WHICH TOOK THE FORM OF BUCKETS OF ICE COLD WATER BEING DUMPED b' ON THEM HY CRAFT PERSONNEL. THE INCIDENTS WERE REPORTED TO () . AND WOULD STOP FOR A FEW WEEKS AND THEN RCSUME AGAIN NOTHING WAS DONE ABOUT THE PROHLFM. (N. ANNA) ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ') - (' 3S8/81804-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I IT WAS NOT UNCOMMON FOR QC INSPECTORS TO HAVE THEIR NCReS ( EITHER VOIDED OR MARKED " ACCEPT AS IS". HE STATED THAT THIS > FREQUENTLY HAPPENEL TO HIM RECAUSE ALL THE NCR8S WOULD 00 ACROSS THE DESK OF THE KAISER PROJECT. MANAGER, . . ( bHO wouLD HAVE THE QA MANAGER, e EITHER VOID OR ') , RFwRITE THEM. (N. ANNA) - COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). CI ( COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM.
( 3S8/81804-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE' NOTE CI HE INDICATED THAT A MAJOR PRORLEM AT ZIMMER WAS THAT THEY (I ( NEVER HAD 4 QA MANAGER WHO WOULD STAND BY THE PROCEDURES AND , BACK UP THE INSPECTORS. THEY WOULD ALWAYS CAVE IN TO PRESSURE AND EITHER VOID THE NCR'S OR ACCEPT THE ITEM AS IS. (N. ANNA) (I ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). I' 356/81804-03 ALLEGATION ZIAMER SEE NOTE II
HE WAS AWARE OF INCIDENTS OF ALLEGED INSPECTOR HARASSMENT GI () WHICH INVOLVED WATER BEING DUMPED'ON THE LATTER BY CRAFT PERSONNEL. HE CONFIRMED THAT THIS HAPPENED TO AND ALTHOUGH REPORTED TO MANAGEMENTe DISCIPLINARY . () ACTION WAS NEVER TAKEN. HE ATTRIBUTED THE ABOVE HARASSMENT II TO THE INSPECTORS DOING THEIR J08 (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-158/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). II. \\# COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. () ip s m , n
7 ~ . C) (? ' 4 fN I) C' r) C PAGE 18 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 ') COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/R1-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 0A/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING s , ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT
I CESPONSE DUE M000LE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION AS$1GNED REPORT NO. ) ( 358/A1804-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ) ' NE RELATED THAT WAS KNOWN AT THE $1TE Asa BIG FOOTa ') I HECAUSE HE WoulD STEP ON YOU IF YOU DIDN'T 00 THINGS HIS WAY. WOULO LOOK AT THE NCR AND THEN G0 OUT WITH ONE OF HIS , CONSTRUCTION MEN AND HAVE THE WELD OR OTHER ITEM WORKED ON SO C) I THAT IT APPEARED ACCEPTARLE. HE WOULD THEN TAKE THE QA HANAGER OUT To SEE THE TTEM, AND HAVE HIM VOID OR REWRITE THE NCR. THIS WAS KNOWN AS IF THE CONCERNED QC INSPECTOR . II RFFUSED TO CHANGE OR VOID THE NCR. THE QA MANAGERe ') . COULD OVERRIDE HIM. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ') CE . COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. (E 58/81804-05 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 'l t ANOTHER PLOY USED TO THWART T,HE WRITING OF NCR'S WAS THE II ISSUANCE OF DESIGN DOCUMENT CHANGES (DDC). HE SAID, THAT IT i) ' WAS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT INSPECTORS WERE NOT TO SUBMIT AN NCR i ON FRIDAYe BUT RATHER TO HOLD IT UNTIL HONDAY. 8Y MONDAY, A CI II ' DDC WOULD HAVE REEN MADE AND THE INSPECTED ITEM WOULD NO LONGER BE IN NONCONFORMANCE. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN-IE REPT 50-35a/al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). bI- II COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. (P CI , 358/81805-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE (I II NRC VOIDING WAS A PRORLEM FOR THE OC INSPECTORS IN THE MECHANICAL / PIPING AREA. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). CI II COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. () (I O ' O. , $; ' C) () di
___ _ _ _ _ _ _-_-_____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ 9 % (? N) . (' ') I' PAGE 19 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TD 0.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/h0/82 COMPLETE LISTING , ITEM RESOLUTION , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPF/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT (' RESPONSE DUE MODULE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO.
- )
. (- 358/81805-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9 I AM AWARE OF THE INCIDENTS OF INSPECTOR HARASSMENT IN WHICH BUCKETS OF WATER WERE DUMPED BY CRAFT PERSONNEL ON QC INSPEC- - ') TORS. THIS HAPPENED TO A FEMALE INSPECTOR NAMED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. THIS WAS REPORIED TO KAISER MANAGEMENT AND ) k I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY ACTION TAKEN. (N. ANNAL- COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). p - <) 358/81#06-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ) II SOME OF MY NCRS WERE VOIDED BY OTHER INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT , ADEQUATE JUSTIFICATION OR EXPLANATION. (N. ANNA) ' COVERED.IN IE PEPT 50-358/81-13.(INVESTIGATION REPORT). 3 I' COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. I 3S8/81806-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') INFORMATION IN-HOUSE PUNCM LIST USED. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT $I (E TME PUNCH LISTS WERE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED. INCLUDED IN PERMANENT' PLANT , DOCUMENTATION, OR DISCLOSED OUTSIDE KAISER. l (N. ANNA) OI II COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ' COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ALLEGATION REFLECTS PAST CONDITION NOW CORRECTED. 358/81806-04 ALLECATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ( IN MY.0 PINION. MANY ITEMS REQUIRING CORRECTION WERE PUT ON A PUNCH LIST WHEN AN NCR WOULD HAVE REEN MORE APPROPRIATE. MINIMUM II ,i WALL VIOLATIONS.,AS AN EsAMPLE, WERE NORMALLY POT ON A PUNCH i LIST. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGAT' ION REPORT). (I L COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ALLEGATION REFLECTS PAST CONDITION NOW CO,RRECTED.
y O - k) u, D D . ,,, ;h l . -
-_ W- b, ' (5 , , () ' , . C 9 ' , f) '(' . () PAGE 20 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 I) COMPUIER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NHC IE REPORT No. 50-35R/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO 0.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 0A/20/82 s COMPLETE LISTING _ ITEM RESOLUTION
, ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT f. RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO.
- )
f 358/81#06-05 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') 1 REWALKED TME DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM AND OBSERVED MANY UNDOCU- ') I MENTED WELOS, GROSS REJECTARLE WORK INCLUDING ARC STRIKES, MINIMUM WALL VIOLATIONS AND UNSATISFACTORY WELDS. e LEAD INSPECTOR IN TME MYDRO GROUP AND.MY IMMEDIATE f SUPERVISORe WARNED ME TMAT UNLESS I STOPPED TURNING IN NCR'S ') AND GENERALLY RACKED OFF ON MY INSPECTIONS TMEY WOULD "6ET MY MONEY". (N. ANNA) f COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/n1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). 'l COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM.- ALLEGATION REFLECTS PAST CONDITION NOW CORRECTED. , 358/81#06-11 . ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ' MANY QC INSPECTORS FELT TMEY WERE INTIMINATED BY VARIOUS CON = . STRUCTION FOREMEN AND WORKERS IN RESPECT TO TMEIR GENERAL f ATTITUDE TOWARD TME QA PROGRAM AND COMPLIANTS REGARDING TME 'l INSPECTIONS. SEVERAL QC INSPECTORS FELT TMEY WERE INTIMINATED BY (N. ANNA) - .
- )
( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. C 358/A1806-13 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE (' I AM AWARE OF CONSTRUCTION WORKERS DUMPING WATER FROM BUCKETS k) ONTO OC INSPECTORS. I WOULD ESTIwATE TMIS OCCURRED AT LEAST , TWELVF TIMES ON A PERIODIC BASIS DURING TME FIFTEEN MONTM () PERIOD I WORKED AT ZIMMER. APPARENTLYe NO ACTION WAS TAKEN TD d) s CORRfCT TMIS PROBLEM. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). b) (I COVERED RY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ' - I' 358/81806-15 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE () (N. ANNA) WAS INTIMIDATED RY . II N) ' COVERED IN IF REPT 50-35R/Bl=13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED RY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. - , () _ ir ; ,
. _- . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ c, e, . . (? f) ' c' r) (' PAGE 21 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82
- )
COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE RFPORT NO. 50-358/81-13- IN RESRONSE TO G.A.P.' FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING . , ITEM RESOLUTION f) 3 ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT (' RESPONSE OUE MODULE NO. HRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIONATFD NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') I' 358/81#07-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') DURING HIS EMPLOYMENT AT ZIMMER, HE WAS AWARE OF BUCKETS OF - '3
(' WATER'REING THROWN ON QC INSPECTORS BY KAISER ENGINEERING ' CONSTRUCTION WORKERS. THIS OCCURRED To AND TWO OR THREE ADDITIONAL QC INSPECTORS. HE WAS UNAWARE OF ANY. "3 I INQUIRY OR INVESTIGATION TO IDENTIFY THE CULPABLE INDIVIDUAL (S), OR ANY RESULTING DISCIPLINARY ACTION. (N. ANNA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). . - (I II COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ' C 358-81808-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE C) ' , KAISER QC MANAGER. WHO HAS BEEN AT ZIMMER SINCE C JULY 1980, HAS VOIDED SEVERAL NONCONFORMANCE~ REPORTS ISSUED ON II
HANGER WELDS. HAD DONE THIS ON THE BASIS OF PERSONALLY , EXAMINING FILLET WELDS BY SHINING A FLASHLIGHT ON THEM FROM A SEVERAL FEET AWAY AND CONCLUDIrG '9E WELD IS ACCEPT 4BLE. \\} 12/09/R0 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (IHVFSTIGATION REPORT). () k COVERED PY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM, .. . ( 358/81808-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER - SEE NOTE ') . HOLT HOLES FOR LARGE RORE PIPE SUPPORT HANGERS ARE REQUIRED To ' l BE MADE RY DRILLING RATHER THAN HURNING. ALTHOUGH SOME INSTANCES 0F BURNED ROLT N0LES HAVE BEFN IDENTIFIED. THERE IS NO ' INSPECTION PROGRAM TO ASSURE THE BOLT HOLES ARE INSPECTED. k) l 12/09/R0. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). (* (D GD ED - C) G> () 4D en - eP, .a _ . s
(~ , (% r)
- . ()
- )
C' <7 . PAGE 22 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 3 I' COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RFSPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/R2 COMPLETE LISTING ' ITEN RESOLUTION ,, C- > ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIN INSPECTOR CLOSE00T ( RESPONSE DUE ' MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ' I' 358/81808-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ! . WELDING NDE QUALITY ENGINEER AND e QA ) I ENGINEER. CGLE, ARE FINDING AS MANY AS 30 DISCREPANCIES DURING
REVIEWS OF ASME CODE D ATA PACKAGE S. THFY ARE GETTING A LOT OF FLACK FROM IDENTIFYING So MANY DISCREPANCIES. THE 3 I' DISCREPANCIES ARE BEING RECORDED ON AN EXCEPTION LIST RATHER THAN IN NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS. HE DID NOT KNOW WHETHER THERE WAS A PROCEDURE CONTROLLING THIS REVIEW, T*:E - II DOCUMENTATION OF DISCREPANCIES AND THF RESOLUTION OF THEM. 12/09/R0 - COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). II COVERED BY.IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. II 358/81808-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR .SEE NOTE ) K AISE R THRE ATENED TO FIRE AN INSPECTOR, e FOR REFUSING ') ( TO ACCEPT A WELD. HE SAID'HE HEARD THAT RAMOS WAS ALSO NEARLY FIRED FOR USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS WMEN EXAMINING WELDS WHEN. IN FACT, HE WAS USING A MIRROR TO VIFW THE FAR SIDE OF A PIPE ') II WELD. 12/09/80 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81=13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). . (' -) 358/81809-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE k) I2 DOCUMENTATION OF IN-PROCESS INSPECTION WAS POOR. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-15R/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ) 358/81s09-05 ALLEGATInN ZIMMER SEE NOTE , ) WELDS ON P&W HANGERS IN THE CABLE SPREADING ROOM WERE OF POOR QUALITY. VENDOR SUPPLIED ITEMS HA0 POOR QUALITY WELDS. L) kd COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 IINVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM,. '(s %) - . , %d () . NF .
r , e Q - . . D C - O 9 PAGE 23 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/s2 - COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC 15 RFPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/s2 . COMPLETE LISTING , , ITEM RESOLUTION , g ITEM No./~ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE00T (. , RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. 9 , f 358/81810-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE '3 ' RFASSIONMENT OF OUT '0F THE 500 LEVEL'Of CONTAINMENT. 9 ( WAS WRITING A LOT OF VALIO NCR K. SUGGESTED THE REASSIGNMENT TO 03/03/81 . COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). .l (. COVEREO BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. f 58/81810-02 ALLEGAfl0N ZIMMER SEE NOTE -) AND WERE THE ONES THAT WERE WRITING A LOT I ( OF NR9S ON HANGERS. WAS DOING A LOT OF SURVEILLANCE REPORTS AND NR8S IN THE ORYWELL, AND MADE THE , STATEMENT TO ME THAT THE HE THOUGHT THESE THREE WERE BEING 3 EXCESSIVE AND NIT-PICKING. TOLD HIM 70 MOVE THEM OUT OF THE RX RUILDING. 03/03/81 , COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). 9 ( COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM, ( ' ZIMMER SEE NCTE 4 358/81810-03 ALLEGATION SUPPRESSION POOL LINER PLATE ROLT WAS BENT. BOLT WAS TENSIONED 9 . ( AFTER A NR HAD BEEN WRITTEN.' CONCURRED IN A MEETING ' AFTEHwARDS. WAS PREVENTED FROM PLACING THE HOLD TAG. 03/03/1A . - O ( COVERED IN IE PEPT 50-358/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , COVERED RY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ' -(. O , 358/81810-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE O (' VOIDED SEVEN NReS. SAID THE INSPECTORS WERE TRAINEES. STATED THAT THEY WERE NOT TRAINEES. 03/03/81 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). b COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. O ' O e G i v m - O ..,6. m
y_ - . . ~ F) {'
.O - ' O C' e) I PAGE 24 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 ') , COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , , ' ITEM RESOLUTION , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR. CLOSEOUT C' RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. RRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 'l I 358/81 slo-c9 ALLEGATION ZIMMER' SEE NOTE ) HE OBSERVED THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERINTENDENT COMING INTO ') (.' AND SAYING TO VOID AN NCR So CONSTRUCTION COULD PROCEED 03/03/81 . COVERED IN IE REPT 50-359/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ) ( COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. { 35a/81 slo-10 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ~ GLADSTONE VOIDED DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM PIPEHANGER NR'S. I INITIAL NReS WERE WRITTC i BY . , AND . 03/03/R1 , COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). O COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ' . f 358/81#10-13 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE ) THEY LET BUTLER GO RECAUSE RUTLER WAS NIT-PICKING. THEY FELT f THAT IF THEY LET BUTLER PEOPLE GO AND WE HAD KAISER INSPECTORS -I IN, THINGS WOULD GO SMOOTHER. 03/03/81 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). s) I' COVERED.BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. I 358/81#10-14 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE A) ANY DAY OF THE WEEM YOU CAN WALK DOWN THERE, PRETTY NEAR ANY- 5) I' WHERE IN THE PRIMARY CONTAINMENT. AND PICK UP A BLANK ROD SLIP THAT WAS SIGNED BY A FOREMAN. AND ANYBODY CAN TAKE THAT ROD SLIP AND WALK THROUGH THE ROD CONTROL BOOTH AND TAKE THE ') k' ROD OUT. THERE IS NO ONE SPECIFICALLY ASSIGNED 70 CHECK WELD R00 CONTROLS. 03/03/R1 WE ARE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH THEM ORAWING TEN LBS OF ROD AND L) Id THE JOB MAY ONLY TAME TWO POUN05. RUT THE LEFT OVER ROD WAS NOT
TURNED IN. COVERED'IN !E REPT 50-358/n1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). k) N) RECENT RIII INSPECTIONS HAVE IDENTIFIFD THIS PROBLEM.. , V () - ! sk t em
- _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - ( 7
. (? . r) ' (% ') . C' PAGE 25 PEGION III.TWACKING SYSTEM . REQUEST OF 04/20/n2 05/07/82 . COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/Al-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA , COMPLETE LISTING , ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM No./ INSPE'CTOR/ ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT I CESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. .) . . 3'.8/81510-18 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SIE NOTE
- )
PROSLEM WITH HEAT NUMRER TRACEARILITY ON SMALL AND LARGE 807E ' '3 PIRING. 03/03/A1 COVERED IN IF REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. . 358/81410-21 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE , PRORLEM WITH SOCKET WELD FITUPS - 1/16 INCH GAP. 03/03/81 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). I COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. CI
J f 358/81s10-22 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE EI IN HIS OPINION, CGLE WAS TRYING TO GET RID OF PEABODY , MAGNAFLUX BECAUSE THEY WERE FINDING TOO MANY THINGS WRONG OR ,
- I
(-
IDENTIFIED TO MANY DEFICIENCIES. 03/03/A1 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). " 358/81510-23 ALLEGATION ZIMMER '; SEE NOTE ( CD WANTED FIRED FOR USING A NAGNIFYING GLASS. INDIVIOUAL 1. WAS TRANFERRED FROM HANGER TO STRUCTURAL bh ' , ( INSPECTOR. HE FELT HE WAS ASKED To TRANSFER INDIVIDUAL I ' BECAUSE THE HANGER INSPECTORS WERE FINDING A LOT OF ERRORS AND WRITING NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS AND HAD BEEN ACCUSED OF NIT-PICKING RY THE CONSTRUCTION SIDE OF KAISER. 03/03/81 OI ( ' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION. PROGRAM. 358/81s10-24 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE. VOIDED SEVEN NCR'S. Ol/13/R1 s . , COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). (I . (s COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ts , i) ir () , ,
_ _ _ _ . . _ - - _ -. - _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ p g - . C' ' O O 7 C PAGE 26 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 ' SRONSE #0 0.4.P. FOIA RFQUEST OF 04/20/82 CeMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-35p/81-13 ' c4 * COMPLETE LISTING i , . ITEM RESOLUTION , . ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT I. CESPONSE OUE MODULE No. 9RIEF DESCRIPTION DESIONATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. O ' I 358/81811-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9 OEFICIENCIES 10ENTIFIE0 RY NONCOMPLIANCE REPORTS WERE OFTEN 9 (* NOT CORRECTED SINCE THE NCRS WERE EITHER VOIDED OR THE ITEM WAS ACCCEPTED AS IS. HE REMARKED THAT e KAISER QA MANAGER, ARBITRARILY VOIOED MANY NCRS IDENTIFYING
9 (. SAFETY RELATED ITEMS WHICH REQUIRED CORRECTION. COVERED IN IE REPT S0-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. . M8/01811 J ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE THERE WAS A LACK OF' TRACEABILITY FOR HEAT NUMBER DOCUMENTA- , TION. MF STATED TMf7 AS LEAD *ELDING INSPECTOR HE WALKED 9 U DOWN PRACTICALLY ALL TWO-INCH CARRON STEEL PIPE AND HE COULD NOT FIND GOOD HEAT NUMRERS. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35a/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , I. COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR O'JALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. 9 ( 9 . ( 0 ( G , O Q O O O G , O G - 0 v O ". i i .- -
\\ ' . r' 7 - . C 9 , . f) (5 < I' PAGE 27 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82
- )
COMPUTER PRINT 0u? RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 , COMPLETE LISTING 7 ITEM RESOLUTION p, , c) ITEM NO./ INSPFCTOR/ I TE M T**s FACILITY NAME LICENSEE . INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE00T' (' KESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF OFaCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ) C' 35R/81s17-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMEH SEE NOTE CD BREACHES OF SECURITY FOR OVER 540 MILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF } (' NUCLEAR FUEL: A. FUEL CRATFS SAT OUT IN THE OPFN. R. JUST 1 TO 3 SECURITY OFFICERS GUANDING THE FUEL. ( C. CLOSED CIRCUIT TV AND THE "E" FIELO ON THE FENCE WERE - 0 NOT YET FUNCTIONAL. D. GUARDS ARMED WITH .3R PISTOLS THAT ONLY CARRIED FIVE '} ( ROUNOS AT A TIME. , E. Guer!DS WFRE NOT QUALIFIED TO HAVF .38'S UNTIL A MAY, 1980 TEST.
- I
I F. FUEL SOMETIMES WAS TOTALLY UNGU*-DED (10 MINUTES ON OCCASION). G. DID NOT OREY HIS OWN RULES ON PROPER ' IDENTIFICATION BEFORE GAINING ACCESS TO CONTROLLED
- I
AREAS. ' H. SUPERVISOR LEFT HIS GUN IN AN UNLOCKED FILE CABINET CI ( AND WAS NOT FIRED. ,I. GUARDS WERE OVERh0RKED AND UNDERSTAFFED. J. LEAD MAN HAS A DRINKING PROBLEM AND CAME TO WORK ORUNK. CD ( (GAP-31 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW OR ACCEPTARLE CONDITION. 358/81817-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ( () . THE CONSTRUCTION CREWS. INCLUDING THE FOREMENs FREQUENTLY WERE DRUNK ON THE JOR. I WOULD SEE THEM SITTING OUT DRINKING IN (I I. THE .'ARKING LOT. EMPLOYEES RROUGHT IN SIX PACKS OF REER IN ' THEIR LUNCH BOXES AND DRANK VERY POWERFUL MOONSHINE LIQUOR AT THE PLANT. IN FACT. FOR 510 YOU COULD BUY A MASON JAR II FILLED WITH MOONSHINE. (GAP-3) ~ NI , COVERED'IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). () II C) ED ' . () ep /dAid
3 ... . ' O 9
. , Q 0 r 7 I PAGE 28 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82
- )
COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING ' ITEM RESOLUTION - , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT b.' KESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 9 b 358/81#17-03 ALLFGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9 BLACK MARKET INCLUDING HOT WEAPONSe RELT BUCKLES, PROSTITUTIONe b BOOKIE OPERATION, GAMRLING. LOTTERIES OF ALL SORTSe RAFFLE OF 9 ' HOT GUNS, A PERSON COULD BOY ANY WE APON DESIREDe PYRAMID GAMES, AND PLACING HORSE RACING PETS. - (GAP-3) b COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/91-13 (INVFSTIGATION kEPORT). O NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW.
c ,) - 358/81e17-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') C INDICATIONS OF ALC0HOL AND ORUG USE. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-359/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). O - Q, 358/81817-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE d b LEAD SECURITY OFFICER. INDIVIOUAL 'J' WAS OBSERVED To BE INT 0XICATED TO THE POINT WHERE HIS ARILITY TO PERFORM HIS JOB \\ WAS IMPAIRED ON APPROXIMATELY 5 TO 10 OCCASIONS. C I,. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). I 358/81817-07 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE d WHILE I WAS ON DUTY GUARDING THE ENTRANCE TO THE 7TH FLOOR, I O k OECAME AWARE OF APPR0x!MATELY A OCCASIONS WHEN THE FUEL WAS LEFT UNATTENDED. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/Rl-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). . 358/81818-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I OBSERVED 50 70 100 RELT RUCKLES HEING SOLD BY WORKERS. ILLEGAL ROOKIE BUSINESS ON 77H FLOOR WHERE NUCLEAR FUEL WAS U, @ STORED. 700 MANY PEOPLE INVOLVED TO CONTROL. UNAUTHORIZED PEOPLE CAME TO THE 77H FLOOR TO MAKE BETS. GAMBLING OPERATION WAS COMMON KNOWLEDGE AT THE. PLANT. (GAP-3) b COVERED IN IE REET 50-35m/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. 0 v 0 4
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . -__ --_ . (s . .. ( . () I' ) I ' PAGE 29 REGION !!! TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-35m/81-13 IN RESPONSE 10 8.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 , COMPLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTION
p, , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE00T DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') I' CESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION
I 358/81s18-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9 ' BREACHES OF SECURITY THAT COULD LEAD TO LOSS OR THEFT OF ') (. NUCLEAR FUEL. ONLY TWO, 04 OCCASIONALLY THREE OFFICERS To PATROL 66 ACRES. AS a RESULT. INTRUDERS COULD EASILY GET PAST THE PERIMETER. GATE SECURITY GUARDS CONSISTED OF A $) I. BUNCH OF CLOWNS. I CAUGHT THEM SLEEPING ON THE TURBINE FLOOR. THEY ROUTINELY LET IN PICKUP TRUCKS FILLED WITH CREWS THAT MAY OR HAY NOT HAVE HEEN AUTHORIZED. FROM 5 P.M. EI I' TO HIDNIGHT THERE WAS NO ONE AT THE GATE. PEOPLE WERE WALKING IN AND OUT OF THE PLANT UNCONTROLLEO. INTRUDERS COULD EASILY GET PAST-THE PERIMETER. THE SECURITY PROGRAM f WAS UNDERSTAFFED. MISMANAGED, AND IN .GENER AL' INEFFECTIVE. CD . SOMETIMES WE WORKED 24 TO A8 HOURS STRAIGHT. WE WOULD ~ HECOME GROGGY AND HUNGRY. WE HAD No SUPERVISION TO OVERSEE '3 00R WORK I WROTE UP DOZENS OF SECURITY INFRACTIONS AND NEVER RECEIVED ANY RESPONSE. NUCLEAR FUFL AT THE PLANT WAS VUL- NERAHLE 10 THEFT FROM 8047, AIRE OR LAND. THE MICROWAVE C SCREEN AND CAMERAS HADN'T BEEN HOOFED UP. FOR ANY PEOPLE CD . WHO WANT TO STEAL NUCLEAR FUEle ZIMMER IS AN EASY TARGET. FAKE PLASTIC EXPLOSIVE APPARENTLY LEFT IN THE PLANT AS A (I ( J0KE. (GAP-3) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35m/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ( C) 358/81818-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 3 I LOTTERIES AT THE PLANT. PRIZES INCLUDED BELT BUCKLES AND l SESSIONS WITH HOOKERS. (GAP-3) , COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). -
- L3
k NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. GI k 35A/81819-02 ALLEGATInw ZIMMER SEE NOTE
KEY CARLE TRAYS AT THE ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THAT ARE O b OVERLOADED AND COMPROMISED BY FAULTY WELOS. TRAYS WERE LOADED TO THE inP WITH CABLES. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR. BIO TRAYS FROM BEING LOADED TO MORE THAT 605 0F THEIR DEPTH. 05 , () (GAP-1) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORTI.. . COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. Of %d COVERED IN LICFNSING HEARINGS. i
. [ [IP , as .
h . <? c) - . () ) C' ') I' PAGE 30 REGION III TRACKING STSTEM 05/07/82 ') COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/A2 COMPLETE LISTING , , , ITEM RESOLUTION ,) , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPF/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE ' INTERIM INS *ECTOR CLOSE0UT (' CESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO.
- )
. I' 358-81821-01 ALLE GATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9 , CREW SUPERVISED RY ROSE IGNORED THE HOLD TAG HE PLACED ON ') I '-
A LINER PLATE. NR 5412 WAS WRITTEN ON THS INCIDENT. GITTINGS TOLD ME THAT THE NR IN QUESTION SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN WRITTEN BECAUSE WE 00 NOT WRITE NR'S ON SOFTWARE, ONLY
- )
( HAR0 WARE PROBLEMS. SAIO. "I AM GOING TO VOID THIS NONCONFORMANCE PEPORT BECAUSE wE 00 NOT NEED THIS KIND OF PAPERWORK FLOATING AROUND RECAUSE THI.S IS THE KIND OF STUFF - ) ( THAT CAUSES INVESTIGATIONS". 5412 WAS ASSIGNED TO ANOTHER NR. ' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ') O s
358/81821-02 ALLEGATION ZIMwFR \\ SEE NOTE C QA UPPER MANarEMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT QA. Q4 MANAGEMENT IS ') . OVERLY INFLUENCED HY CONSTRUCTION AND IS NOT INDEPENDENT ON . SITE. ' (I II COVERED IN IE REPT 50-359/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , CI ( 358/81825-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE s AS MUCH AS MOS OF THE CARLE TRAYS THROUGHOUT THE PLANT ARE (I ( OVERLOADED REYOND NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE SPECIFICATIONS OF VOLUME PER TRAY. THFSE TRAYS ARE FILLED TO AS MUCH AS 150E OF CAPACITY IN SOME CASES. THIS REQUIRING THE ADDITION OF SI ( SIDE PLATES To ACCOMODATE THE EXCE%S CABLES. THE ADDITION OF
THESE SIDE PLATES IS MERELY FOR COSMFTIC EFFECT. AND DOES NOT ADD TO THE CAPACITY OF THE TRAYS. THIS OVERLOADINS WILL CAUSE bI II INDUCTANCE (HEAT) WHICH WILL CAUSE RPEANDOWN OF CABLES IF THE NEAT GENERATED IS OF SUFFICIENT LEVEL. ADDITIONALLYI INSTRU- MENT MALFUNCTIONS AND FIRES ARE A DIRECT POSSIBILITY DUE TO kh () OVERLOADING. (GAP-3) COVERED IN IF REPT 50-3SM/R1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORil. COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. NI () COVERED IN LICFNSING HEARINGS, EP . ED () ss () . di .
e -- 9 (s ry . - . (? r) . r) 4 . '
- )
' ( PAGE 31* PEGION III TRACKING SYSTEM . , 05/07/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-35R/RI-13 IN RESPONSE TO 8.A.P. FOIA PEQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING ,f , ITEM RESOLUTION ,) ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / 8ACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT I JESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. CI f 358/81825-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') THE SPREADER ROOM IS DIRECTLY BELOW THE CONTROL ROOM AND CON- f TAINS ALL MONITORING CARLES FOR THE PLANT THROUGH CABLE TRAYS '3 ' AND CONDUIT. IN THIS ROOM THE CABLE TRAYS ARE CVERLOADED. SOME SEISMIC HANGERS.IN THE SPREADFR ROOM ARE OF THE WRONG I' TYPE AND 00 NOT MEET SARGENT AND LUNDY SPECIFICATIONS IN ") THAT THEY ARE OVERLOADED. OR1GINAL FIRE PROOFING SPECIFIC- ATIONS CANNOT RE MET DOE TO DOURLING OF THE ORISINAL CABLE ') II AMOUNTe IN THE SPREADFR ROOM AND THROUGHOUT THE PLANT. (GAD-3) ' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. , ') ( COVERED IN LICENSING HEARINGS. 358/81825-07 ALLEGATION
- ZIMMER
SEE NOTE ') WITHIN THE LAST YEAR I ORSERVED REDUNDANT CONDUIT SYSTEMS (I l INSTALLFD ON THE SAME SEISMIC HANGER. IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF , SPECIFICATIONS. I DO NOT MNOW WHETHER THIS PROBLEM HAS BEEN CORRECTED TO DATE. A LARGE PROBLEM IS THAT THESE ARE ESSENTIAL ( CABLESo MONITORED BY QUALITY CONTROL, AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN 10 YELLOW TAGGED REFORE CABLE PULLING WAS DONE. SUCH WAS NOT THE CASE. (GAP-3) (~ COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). di COVERED IN PAST NRC REP 0 HTS. COVEHED IN LICENSING HEARINGS. ,. , 358/81sE6-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE GENERALLY CONFIRMED AND ESTIMATE THAT 205 0F THE WELDS IN THE PREFABRICATED PIPING ARE FAULTY. OI I,' IGAP-2) COVENED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). () II 358/81826-02 ALLEGAT!nN ZIMMER SEE NOTE II () KAISER DID NOT WANT TO REPAIR WELDS ON PREFA8RICATED WELDING. (GAP-21 . COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). u & < r d. t iP , C) ' , - .*-
__ - - ._ - - .. C' k) ' .. () I) ' C' <) I' PAGE 32 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 '3 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING _ C' ') ITEM RESOLUTION , , . ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM ' INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT I' EESPONSE DUE MODU (E No. BPIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') I 358/81#26-03 ALLFGATION ZIMMFW SEE NOTE 'l HE AGREED THAT KAISER WAS CUTTING THE FLUSH TIME FROH SIR hEEKS 3 I - TO TWO WEEK $e AND WITHOUT ADEQUATE TESTING AFTERWARD. (GAP-2) COVERED IN IE REPT S0-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ( ') - 358/81#16-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE l C HE VERIFIED THE CLOGGED DRAINS IN THE RAD WASTE ROOM. (GAP-2) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/R1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). C - 35A/81826-05 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') C HE VERIFIED THE ARGON LEAKS AND SAID HE WOULD NOT HAVE WORKED IN THOSE R00HS. GASES LEAKED INTO THE PLANTe AND THE VENTILATION SYSTFM IS INADEQUATE. (GAP-2) ') II COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). I 358/81#26-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE. NOTE
- 3
ERRATIC CARE OF WELDING RODS. (GAP-2) (I ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REFORT). ( 358/81#26-0T ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9I ' HF REMEMRERED THE ACCIDENT WITH THF MEAT EXCHANGER,~WHEN A .d ( PRESSURE MIXUP RIPPED OPEN HEAVY PIPING. THE ACCIDENT SHOOK THE WHOLE BUILDING. (GAP-2)~ , COVEREO IN IE REPT 50-358/01-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , 358/81#26-10 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE THE SCUTTLERUTT AMONG WORKERS IS THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO BE - , WITHIN 100 MILES OF THE ZIMMER PLANT WHEN THE POWER (' ON. ~ (GAP-2) ' IS TURNED I COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/RI-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). PERSONAL OPINION OF INDIVIDUAL OR NO APPARENT SUBSTANCE. %,) . <> () EE , ,
7 -- .
C' ') , . ()
- )
' O q ' PAGE 33 REGION III THACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 ') I COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-35R/RI-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P.. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING . , ITEM RESOLUTION p. , , - - _ _ ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT I CESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. RRIEF OESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO.
- )
f 358/81826-12 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') HE DESCRIRED MAISER'S QA PROGRAM AS HA CIkCUS". THE STANDARDS ') I . RANGED FROM FULL DOCUMENTATION AND INSPECTION TO INFORMAL CHECKLISTS. KAISER MANAGEMENT CHANGED THE QA GROUND RULES EVERY TWO TO THREE WEEKS. -(GAP-2)
- )
f COVERED IN IE REPT 50-359/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ' ( () 358/81s26-14 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I NE ALSO PASSED ALONG THE WIDESPREAD PELIEF THAT ELECTRICAL (I CABLE TRAYS ARE PACKED DANGEROUSLY FULL. (GAP-2) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). CI COVENED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. COVERED IN LICENSING HEARINGS. ( GD 358/81s26-15 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE k HIS MOST SIGNIFICANT ADDITION INWOLVES THE HYDRAULIC CD SYSTEM THAT CONTROLS THE RESIDUE HEAT VALVES. THESE VALVES ARE INSIDE THE CONTAINMENT VESSEL AND CONTROL THE FLOW OF HOT WATFR ') . I SUT OF THE REACTOR. IN THE SPRING OF 19T9, INSTALLED 2.Us0 POUND FITTINGS FOR THE VALVES. BUT THE SYSTEM CONTEM- , PLATES 2 000 POUNDS ACTUAL PRESSURE. AS A RESULT, 5 000 POUND 3 ( - FITTINGS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE INSTALLE0 AS A SAFETY PRECAUTION. SAID THE PLA" WAS TO INSTALL THE INADEQUATE FITTINGS FOR THE TIME BEINGe AND TEAR THEM OUT LATER. (GAP-2) ') I COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/Rl=13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). - ( 358/81s26-16 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE () NE WAS CONCERNED A8ouT THE QUALITY OF NETAL USED FOR ' E) (> THE RESIDUE HEAT VALVES. HE RELATED AN UNBELIEVABLE INCIDENT WHEN HE HUMPED AGAINST A RESIDUE HEAT VALVE AND IT BROKE OFF. (GAP-2) (I N) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). GD ss 1 -. NF ( ()
N
V - C) C'
1 . . () ()
. (' /) C' PAGE 34 REGION III TRACKING STS. TEM 05/0T/82 (1 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO 6.4.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/R2 COMPLETE LISTING g , ' ITEM RESOLUTION ,_) , ITEN NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / >ACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT I' CESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO.
- )
C 358/8182T-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') , MAIN STEAM RELIEF PIPING - INSTALLED 8 INCH PIPE WHICH HAD TO I BE TORN OUT AND REPLACED WITH 10 INCH PIPE. $320 000 LABOR TO ') REMOVE THE PIPING. (GAP-2) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). V , , ' 358/81H2T-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE OVERLAPS IN THE X-RAYS THAT 'C0VERED PREFABRICATED PIPING. THE X-RAYS REwEALED THAT THE WFLDS ON THE PREFABRICATED PIPING WAS , ( FAR WORSE THAN ANY WELO WE MAD DONE ON THE J08, "BUT WE ONLY - REPAIRED OUR OWN WELDS AND LEFT JHE FABRICATED WELDS AS THEY WERE". HE ESTIMATED AT LEAST 20% OF THE PREFABRICATED WELDS ) C - WERE DEFECTIVE. (GAP-2) - COVEWED IN IE REPT 50-358/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORTI. (' () 358/9182T-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMEP SEE NOTE f' HAIN STEAM RELIEF 10 INCH REPLACEMENT PIPING WAS DELIVERED ') WITHOUT ADEQUATE PERSONNEL AVAILAaLE FOR UNLOADING. AS A RESULT, THE PIPES WERE OROPPED. X-RAYS DEMONSTRATED THAT WELOS WERE . ( FAULTY. THE PIPING wAS INSTALLED AFTER BEING REJECTED.(GAP-2) () , COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). - CCVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. 358/8182T-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE RIVER WATER INTAKE FLUES PLUGGED WITM SAND AND MUD. (GAP-21 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ') (' COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. 50.55EE) FILED BY LICENSEE. (* L) 358/8182T=05 ' ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE $3 OPERATORS MEEP LIQUOR AND DRINK IN THE CONTROL R00H. SOME C) EMPLOYEES CONSUME " ANGEL 0057" AND OTHER DRUGS ON THE JOH. DRUNKNESS ON TME JOR IS NOT UNCOMMON. (GAP-2) 4- COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT 3. b) , , 5} .J .
'~ ..
O . C 9 D G .
PAGE 35 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 COMRUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-358/81-13 IN RESRONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/R2 COMRLETE LISTING (. - , ITEM RESOLUTION g, , ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITFM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT I' EESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. 9 I 358/81827-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE. NOTE O MANAGFMENT OFFICIALS WINK THEIR EYFS AT DRINKING OT THE JOB. O ( (GAP-2) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 (INvFSTIGATION REPORT). ( I O 358/8182T-07 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I RADWASTE FLOOR'ORAINS CLOGGED WITH CONCRETE. (GAP-2) 4) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). [ - () 358/81827-08 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE' NOTE HIGH PRESSURE / LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM INTERTIE - THROUGH ERROR ')
OVERPRESSURIZEn THE-LOW PRESSURE RIPING (48 IN DIA. 3/8 INCH THICK STEELI AND IT RUPTURED. THE HIGH PRESSURE PUMP k SHOULD NOT RE CONNECTED TO THE LOW PRES $URE SYSTEM. (GAP-2) O COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. , ' 358/81827-09 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE ' WORKER DIZZINESS 00E TO HERELY CRIMPING AND WIRING ARGON PO4GE GAS HOSES. (GAP-2) I' COVERED IN IE'REPT 50-35R/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). O I 358/81827-10 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE O SECURITY PRORLEMS - THE FENCE ON TME RIVER SIDE IS ONLY FOUR FT. O k' HIGH CHICKEN WIRFe NUCLEAR FUEL IS NOW REING DELIVERED, RUT THE ' SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS ARE NOT HOOKED t)P. THE ONLY SECURITY FOR STORING THE FUFL IS TWO GUARDS ON THE TTH FLOOR. (GAP-2) O b COVENED IN IE REPT 50-35R/R1-13 (INvFSTIGATION REPORT). O C ,. v 9 'O gj ,
.- ' () ' (s . . () ) cs . <) REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 <> (' PAGE 36 , IF REPORT No. 50-358/R1-13 IN RESPONSE TO 8.A.P. FOIA PEQUEST OF 04/20/R2 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RFLATIVE TO NRC , COMPLETE LISTING , . . ITEM RESOLUTION , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSECUT (' EESPONSE DUE M00utE NO. RAIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATFD NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') . C 356/8182T-11 ALLEGATION ZIMMF# SEE NOTE 'l WELDING POD TEMPERATURE CONTROL. (G4P-2) ') b COVERED.IN IE REPT 50-3SR/81.-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED IN PAST NRC REP 0Eis. ( I) ~ , 358/8182T-17 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ( CGLE HAD CONTACTED THE HEAD OF PEAHODY MAGNAFLUX TO HAVE A LOCAL ') P.M. VICE PRESIDENT SILENCE THE RADIOGRAPHERS. RADIOGRAPHS STOLEN FROM P.M. - UTILITIES COPY LOST. (GAP-21. ' ') b COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). _ { 358/8182T-13 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') IN MY EXPERIENCE, THE UNANIMOUS OPINION AMONG EVERYONE OUTSIDE (' 0F MANAGEMENT IS THAT NO ONE IS WILLING TO BE WITHIN RANGE OF ) THE PLANT WHEN "THE SWITCH IS PULLEDH AND IT GOES ON-LINE. (GAP-2) (I I COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). PERSONAL OPINION OF INDIVIDUAL OR NO APPARENT SUBSTANCE. ( () 3S8/Cle2R-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ' (I I' I AM PARTICULARLY CONCERNED THAT WHEN PEABODY-MAGNAFLUX ATTEMPT- En TO PURSUE THE MEY ISSUES I RAISED ON THE PIPES THEY WERE REMOVED FROM THE JOR AND THEIR DATA SEIZED WITHOUT EXPLANATION () () OR F.0 Llo wuP . (GAP-11 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. ) 358/81828-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I WAS ARLE TO VERIFY FACTUALLY ALLFGaTIONS OF LAROR PERSONNEL PADDING THEIR TIME CARDS WITH WORK HOURS NOT SPENT ON THE CON- (I 6) STRUCTION SITE. (GAP-1) COVERED IN IE REPT S0-35R/81-13 IINVESTIGATION REPORT). NOT w! THIN NRC PURVIEW. ) m 8 e ,1 o W -
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - . .
( ()
,. () I) . (~ ?) I ' PAGE 37 . REGION III TRACKINS SYSTEH 05/07/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE RFPORT No. 50-358/Al-13 IN Resp 0NSE 70 6.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/R2 COMPLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTION , .) IYEM MO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPF/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIH INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT (' RESPONSE 00E MODutE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') I' 356/81828-05 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE CI I ALSO DISCOVERED LACKNESS IN SECURITY THAT VIOLATED NRC { REGULATIONS ON SEARCHING VENICLES THAT ENTERED AND LEFT THE t3 PLANT SITE. THE GUARDS ALLOWED CERTAIN EMPLOYEES THEY KNEW - TO DRIVE IN AND OUT OF THE PLANT SITE WITHOUT CHECKING THE f) ( TPUCMS.. (GAP-13 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/n1=13 (INVF.STIGATION REPORT). NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. 358/8182A-07 ALLEGATION ZIHMER SEE NOTE THE PM EMPLOYEES I SPOKE WITH WERE CONCERNED THAT PIPES THEY HAD REJECTED UNCER THE QA PROGHAM wERE BEING INSTALLED ANY- (I
WAY. (GAP-1)
COVENED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). - 6 db 35M/81828-08 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ( PERSONNFL I SPOKE WITH SAID THE INSPECTION SHEETS 80RE LITTE CD RELATION TO REALITY. THEY WANTED ME To KNOW THAT THE INSPEC- TION SHEETS wERE FRAUDULENT. (GAPall ') I COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). UNwORMARLE, LACK OF SPEC'FICITY OR UNCLEAR. ( 358/81828-09 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE , 'd I UP TO 20E OF THE PREFAHRICATED PIPING WELDS WERE FAULTY. PIPING WAS !NSTALLED IN THE HAIN STEAH RELIEVE PIPING SYSTEM. (GAP-Il . k) I COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). () 358/81s28-10 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE II EMPLOYEFS RAFFLING HANOGUNS. (GAP-1) II () COVEHED IN IE REPT 50-358/al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT!. , NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. %; . GP O - lglnir ,
f () . C'
. ()
- )
, (. r) e (' PAGE 38 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 ') COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO 0.4.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , ITEM RESOLUTION , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYpt/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT . ( KESFONSE 00E MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED,NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNFO REPORT NO. ') I' 358/81828-11 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ' ') P.M. EMPLOYEES TOLD ME THEY wERE REING OVERRIDDEN REPEATED'LY ( ON THEIR FINDINGS OF FAULTY WELOS AND THREATENED WITH LOSS OF II THEIR JnHS IN GENERAL. (GAP =1) COVERED IN IE PEPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , SEE NOTE 358/81828-12 ALLEGATION ZIMMER ' , THE P.M. TRAILER ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAD BEEN BROKEN INTO. TMEIR DOCUMENTS PERTINENT .TO FAULTY WELDING HAD BEEN PILFERED. ( (GAP-1) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-354/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). O
- 3
358/81828-13 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I THE FLUSHING PROCESS MISSED' LITERALLY PILES OF SLAG, AND SEDI- 'I MENT OR CRUSTY RUST THAT FORMS ON THE INSIDE OF PIPES. THE STANDARD FLUSHING TIME HAD BEEN HEDUCED FROM SIX WEEKS TO Two dI ( WFEKS. (GAP-1) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ( . 6I 358/81828-14 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ( P.M. HAD BEEN FIRED BECAUSE IT TRlFD TO 00 ITS JOB HONESTLY CI , w! THIN THE SYSTEM. (GAP-1) COVERED IN IE REPT 5G-354/81-33 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ) - 35:i/81828-16 ALLEGATION ZIMHFR SEE NOTE ' (' -) EVERY WORKER AT THE ZIMMER PLANT THAT I SPOKE WITH PRIVATELY , INSISTED THAT WHEN "THE Sw!TCH IS FINALLY PULLE0H AND THE POWER 5) , k' TURNED ON. HE HAG NO INTENTION OF REING ANYWHEEE WITHIN l HUNDREDS OF MILES OF THE ZIMwEN PLANT. (GAP-1) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). NI N) . UNWOMMARLEe LACK 0F SPECIFICITY OR UNCLEAR. PERSONAL OPINION OF INDIVIDUAL OR NO APPARENT SUBSTANCE. b) As ! ' () . ' NF ;
,- _ - . c. , <. 0 O . (' PAGE 39 REGION !!! TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 ) Co*PUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO 8.4.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/R2 COMPLETE LISTING ., , ITEM RESOLUTION ., , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE00T ', I EESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. HRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') f 358/81s29-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') SEVERAL EMPLOYEES ORSERVED PASSING THROUGH THE GATE WITHOUT l, s
- )
RECORDING THEIR TIME IN AND OUT. 12/10/T9 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35m/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. , 358/81s29-07 ALLFGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE SUSPICIOUS FIRF IN THE SUPPRESSION CHAMBER. 12/14/T9 COVERED IN IE REPT*50-3%R/R1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ' ) 358/81s29-08 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE > .( . . IF SOMEONE WANTED TO MNOW THE TRUTH OF THE SITUATION THERE WERE FAULTY wELOS AND MISREPRESENTED x-RAYS DONE BY MAGNAFLUK AND ') ( THAT HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND HOW THry COULD RE GETTING AWAY WITH THIS UNLF.SS SOMEONE WAS RUYINr OF* "O HRIGING THE Nic INSPECTOR 9 ON THE JQR. 12/1T/79 ') -( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORTI. , I 358/81929-10 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE t) , INDICATED THAT MAGNAFLUX WAS UNCOVERING FAULTY WELDS E) I' AND IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WAS BEING PRESSURED BY EITHER MAISER QUALITY ASSURANCE PEOPLE OR CGkE MANAGEMENT TO PASS INSPECTION ON FAULTY WELDS. 12/26/74 . CI I COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 IINVFSTIGATION REPORT). G- G> G* GD . 6) ED 3 f%* O
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . - - _ _ _ -. _, __ (? ()
. ()
- )
C' ') I' PAGE A0 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/cT/82
- }
COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE 10 NRC IE RFPORT No. 50-358/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. F0IA REQUEST OF OA/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING .s g ITEM RESOLUTION ( ('
- 2
, - ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIH INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT 1 C' CESPONSE DUE MODULE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT No. ') C' 358/81829-11 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE [3 SOME PIPING HAD ARRIVED RY TRUCK AND OUE TO LACK 0F PROPER f EQUIPMENT TO UNLOAD THE MATERIAL IT WAS SIMPLY PUSHED OF THE- I) TRUCK CAUSING POSSIBLE DAMAGE TO THE MATERIAL. INDICATED THAT ALTHOUGH THERE WAS DAMAGE TO THIS PIPING C' MATERIAL. IT WAS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION ANYWAY AND THAT THE f) INSPECTION RY MAGNAFLUX OF THIS MATERIAL WAS APPROVED BY KAISER QUALITY ASSURANCE ALTHOUGH MAGNAFLUX HAD REJECTED IT. 12/26/T9 . () C COVERED IN IF REPT 50-3SR/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT).*
COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. (' I) 358/81829-12 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE'.N0TE ) b 8 INDICATED THAT IN SPEAMING.WITH SAFETY COORDINATOR, e NE KNEW AT LEAST 20E OF THE WELDS ALREADY INSTALLED IN PIPING THROUGHOUT THE PLANT To BE FAULTY.12/2T/T9 ') ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-3SR/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). f 358/81829-13 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE ') HAD OHJECTED TO THE FLUSHING PPOCEDURE USED TO TEST THE 4) ( PIPING AND HAD OBJECTED SEVERLY TO THE FACT A PARTICULAR FLUSH 'THAT SHOULD HAVE TAKEN SIA httKS WAS CUT TO TWO WEEKS. ( ' HAD REPEATEDLY TRIED TO ORJECT To THE METHOD USED TO FLUSH L) THE MAIN STEAM CRITICAL PIPING AND AT ONE TIME HAD EVEN PROVED To THE CONTROL ROOH AND QA PERSONNEL THAT THEIR FLUSHING PRO- CEDURE MAS INAPPROPRIATE BY POUNu1NG ON SECTIONS OF THE HAIN N) * C2 STEAH RELIEF PIPING DURING A FLUSHING PROCECURE. THIS RELEASING SE0! MENT AND SLAG WHICH RELIEVFD AT A LATER DATE COULD RE RELEASED. 12/27/T9 k) () COVERED IN IE REPT $D-35R/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). 6) C) 4 L) <> () iP' r a
, (s . - . () ') . C' ') x I' FAGE Al REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-35R/st-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING
, ' , ITEM RESOLt) TION ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPF/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT . I CESPONSE DUE wo00LE No. 9RIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') ( 358/81829-14 ALLFGATION ZIMwER SEE NOTE 'l SUPERVISOR OF QA, WAS OFFINIENTLY INVOLVED IN ( ORDERING THE PASSING OF FAULTY WELDS WHICH MAGN 4 FLUX REPORTED. '3 THE SUPERVISOR OF THE MAGNAFLUM CREW INDICATED THAT THE MAGNA- ( , FLUX COPIES OF THE X-RAY REPORTS WOULD NOT COINCIDE WITH KAISER
- )
QA REPORTS. MAISER AND CGLE WERE TRYING TO GET RID OF HAGNAFLUX FROM THE JOR OFCAUSE THEY KNEW Too MUCH. HE POINTED OUT THAT WELO NUMBER Nell WHICH HE FELT TO HE AN INSERT FAULT ON THE ( x-RAY IN THE MAIN STEAM RELIEF PIPING DOWN IN THE SUPPRESSION CI ' POOL WAS ORDERFD PASSED BY QA PERSONNEL. 12/2T/T9 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-3SR/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). I COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. () ( 358/81s31-01 ALLEGATION ZIPMER SEE NOTE CI FIVE NR'S WERE WRITTEN FOR DEFECTIVE HANGER WELDS IN DG ROOM A. ( THE NR'S WERE RETURNED WITHOUT PROCESSINGl HOWEVER. THE DEFECTS (I hERE REPAIRED. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/Rl-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ( COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRWATION PROGRAM. (I _ ( 358/81832-01- ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE E) DURING MY REVIEWS OF THESE ORAWINGS I FOUND THAT THE ISOMETRIC ( DRAWINGS AND NE-1 FORMS, DID NOT WATCH WITH WHAT WAS IN THE () FIELD. SPECIFICsLLY, THE HEAT NUwHERS FOR PIPE SECTIONS, ROD SLIPS WITH WELD ROD NUMBERS, AND HEAT NUMBERS FOR CONSUMABLE EI l INSERTS DID NOT MATCH WHAT WAS IN THE FIELD. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-3Sn/Al-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ( %) 358/81s33-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE L) b I AM AWARE OF SEVERAL INSTANCES OF WATER BEING THROWN ON ONE
' QC INSPECTOR AND OTHER CRAFT PERSONNEL. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/Al-13 IINVESTIGATION REPORT). %) v "I
ji<> <,u
. . _ - - -_--_____ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - ' o - e . . . O O e O b PAGE A2 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 O COMPUTER PRINT 0UT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-354/R1-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTION ITEH NO./ I NSPE CTOR /- ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT ( CESPONSE DUE M00utE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. O C' 358/81s33 02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE O IS TOO CRITICAL AN0 NIT-PICKING IN HIS INSPECTIONS. ,) ( HE HAS OFTEN REQUESTED MY PEOPLE TO GRIND AND POLISH WELDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ASME CODE WHEREAS HE SHOULD BE FOLLOW- ING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN THE AWS CODE. I b HAVE THREATENED TO HAVE TERMINATED IF HE CONTINUED ') To HOLD UP CONSTRUCTION CREWS WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). . g 35'8/81833-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE' NOTE I BELIEVE THE ASSIGNMENT IS RETTER FOR ALL CONCERNEO. COVEWED IN IF REPT $0-358/41-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). 358/81834-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE . O ') A FEu 0F THE INSPECTORS APPEAR TO HAVE DIFFICULTY GETTING ALONG WITH THE CRAFT PERSONNEL THEY PREFER TO CONOUCT INSPECTIONS (' GN THEIR OW4 RATHER THAN TRYING TO SOLICIT THE COOPERATION OF O CRAFT PERSONNEL. THIS MAY BE THE RESULT OF WEAK LEAD INSPECTORS WHO ARE UNAHLE TO PROPFRLY GUIDE. CONTROL AND DIRECT THE INSPEC- 'O TORS WHO REPORT TO THEM. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-354/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). .o - 358/81834-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE O ( AND WERE OVERCRITICAL IN THEIR INSPEC- TIONS AND COULD NOT GET ALONG WITH CRAFT PERSONNEL. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). O 358/81s35-01 ALLEGATI'nN ZIMMER SEE NOTE ,O G , I WAS IN THE DRYWELL OF THE PRIMARY CONTAINMENT, LEVEL SPAe WHEN A COUPLE OF GALLONS OF COLD WATER WERE DUMPED ON HE. I O O WAS CONDUCTING AN INSPECTION AT THE TIME. - COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/M1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). v O , . bls ' 5q O - .
.- . . (' f)
- . ( () . (' f) f PAGE A3 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82
- )
COMRUTER PRINTOUT RFLATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-359/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING 7 ITEM RESOLUTION g ,.) ITEM No./ INSPECT 0P/ ITEM TYPF/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIH INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT I' CESPONSE DUE MODULE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No.
- )
I' 338/81836-n1 ALLEGATION ZIMwED SFE NOTE II SAID THE NR FOR A IGNORING THE LINER PLATE HOLD TAG CI I_ wouLD NOT BE PROCESSED. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-359/Al-13 IINVFSTIGATION REPORT). f () 358/81836-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE (I I WOULD COME OUT TO THE QC TRAILER WITH AN NR IN HAND. OR CALLS US 70 THE FIELD ANO cuESTION US WHY WE IDENTI. FIED A NONCONFORMING ITEM. ON THIS JOR THE HEAD OF CONSTRUCTION CI ( DIRECTS INSPECTORS TO MEET HIM IN THE FIELD AND EXPLAIN TO HIM PERSONNALLY THE JUSTIFICATION F0H WRITING A NR REPORT. I FELT WAS ATTEMPTING TO INTIMIDATE FIELD INSPECTORS BY THIS ' CI ( ACTION. AFTER ONE OF THESE DISCUSSIONS WITH e I WAS TOLD To DIRECT HY INSPECTORS To REMOVE ANY NONCONFORHING ' VENDOR WELDS FROM NR REPORTS. CI I CovERFD IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 flNVFSTIGATION REPORT). CovEkED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM.
I (I 358/81836-05 ALLFGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE () I MANY OF THE No REPORTS TMAT WERE WRITTEN BY THE INSPECTORS HAVE NEEN VOIDED BY THE QA 0FPARTMENT. COVERED IN !E REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ' OI . ( COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROSRAM. ' - SEE NOTE GI I 358/81836-06 ALLEGATION ZIM"Eu 1
. mE DID NOT INSPECT TO CONFIGURATION AND LOCATION FOR PIPE OI (* HANGERS. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-158/A1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). (- () ~ 358/81836-09 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE k# SURVEILLAN'CE REPORTS ARE NOT BEING CONVEviED INTO NR'S AFTER ' GI TMIRTY DAYS. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORTl. (I ' As CovEHED HY IAL PHOVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIR'1ATION PROGRAM. O }
) - - ., >
.
q .. . ()
- )
. f) (5 . (' PAGE 44 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEN 05/0T/82 I) . COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO Npc IE REPORT No. 50-35R/nl-13 "4 'Sp0NSE IS G.A.P. FOIA REGUEST OF 04/20/R2 CouPLETE LISTING , , ITEM RESOLUTION , , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPF/ SACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT
- )
(' CESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED No. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. C' 358/81s36-12 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE
- )
P AND W VENDOR SUPPLIED WELDS IN THE CONTROL ROOM ARE OF POOR ') . I.' QUALITY AS ARE SUPER-STRUT WELDS IN THE CABLE SPREADING ROOM. . COVEREO IN IE REPT 50-35R/R1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). (- ') 3SR/81836-18 ALLEGATION ZIMuER SEE NOTE ( LFAD QC INSPECTOR WAS REMOVED FROM NIS JOB BY MEI NANAGEMENT
- )
- AFTER SUBMITTING NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS ON DEFICIENT PIPE SUPPORT HANGER WELOS. INSPECTORS MAD REJECTED ABOUT 955 0F ( 7"!SE WELDS. COVE 9ED IN IE REPT 50-35R/RI-13 (INVF5f! GAT!0N REPORT). , = . . . . _ r 358/81e37-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER ,SEE NOTE ') I I AM AWARE OF SEVFRAL INCIDENTS OF WATER BEING THROWN ON CHAFT PERSONNEL AND QC INSPECTORS OVER THE PAST SEVERAL TEARS. , I AM NOT AWARE OF ANYONE REING TERMINATED OR ANY DISCIPLINARY
- )
I' ACTION PEING TAKEN. COVERED IN IF REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ( i) ~ 358/81837-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ( INDICATIONS OF ALCOHOL AND MARIJUANA ARUSE ON SITEe RAFFLING OF () GUNS AND PROSTITUTES, ANO BOOKMAKING OPERATIONS. , COVERED IN IE REPT 50-158/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). - ) 358/81s38-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ) , I DID ONSERVE INSPECTORS GET DOUSED WITH WATER ON OCCASION. C0wERED IN IE REPT 50-354/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , ) , 358/81839-01 ~ ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE () b> I MAVE HEEN HARASSED WMILE ON THE JOR SITE BY THE DUMPING OF WATER. b) kJ COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). NF[ () 4
. - - c u ~ . C O C- O , f PAGE AS REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE To NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-35a/Al-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 0A/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , ITEM RESOLUTION g, , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEu TYPF/ rACILITY NAMF LICENSEE INTERIH INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT f CESPONSE DUE MODULE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT NO. O f 358/81839-02 ALLEGATION. , ZIHMER SEE NOTE O NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS ARE VOIDED OR HAVE INADEQUATE O I DISPOSITIONS. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INvFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRWATION PROGRAM. 358/81840-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE SHORTLY AFTER I BEGAN CORRECTING THESE WELDERS DURING THE IN PROCESS INSPECTION %, ! BEGAN GFTTING RUCKETS OF WATER DUMPED ') . I ON HE wHEN I WENT TO INSPECT A WELD. THIS WOULO HAPPEN TO ME TWO OR THREE T!HES A WEEK. I WAS SPRAYED WITH A FIRE EXTINGUISHER. , A CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR, HAD ME .) SFARCHED AT THE GATE WHILE HE WATCHED. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ') 358/81s41-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMEW SEE NOTE ') ( WATER DUMPED ON QC INSPECTOR BY CRAFT PERSONNEL 3 OR 4 TIMES HETwfEN AUGUST 1979 AND AUGUST 19RO. I HAVE ALWAYS REEN IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING AN INSPECTION WHEN THE WATER HAS BEEN O I DUMPLD ON ME. NO DISCIPLINARY ACTION WAS TAMEN. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35m/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ( 0 , 354/81842-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMFp SEE NOTE ~ O I , QC IN3PECTOR, WAS REASSINGED FROM THE ORYWELL TO THE FABRICATION SHOP. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORTI. g 358/8Is42-02 ALLFGATION FIMMER SEE NOTE I HAVE HEARD RUMORS THAT , , AND ALL OC INSPECTORS, WERE ALSO GOING TO BE REASSIGNED - . O O SINCE THEY 700 WERE SUPPOSEDLY BEING TOO NIT-PICMING IN THEIR INSPECTIONS. , COVEREO IN IE REPT 50-35R/Al-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ' _ abu:X
) ' , .. C) " C'. . . O O . C' ') . I' PAGE 46 REGION III TRACMING SYSTEM 05/07/82 ') COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NHC IE REPORT NO. 50-35R/st-13 IN RESPONSE TO 8.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/A2 , COMPLETE LISTING ,.) ITEM RESOLUTION ,) , , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPF/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT C' RESPONSE DUE MODULE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. ') C' 358/81842-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE ') I AM AWARE THAT TWO OR THREE INSPECTORS INCLUDING I AND , HAVE HAD WATER DupPED ON THEM BY CRAFT ') PERSONNFL. I AM AWARE OF NO DISCIPLINARY ACTION OR FORMAL REPORTS BEING MADE. ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/PI-13 (INVFSTIGATION' REPORT). ') C 35A/81842-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') INDICATIONS OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG ARUSE ON SITE. . I COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ) f 358/81842-05 ALLEGATION ZIMMER 'SEE NOTE ) ' CRAFT PERSONNEL TENSIONED PLATE AFTER A HOLD TAG HAD REEN I? PLACED. NR 5412 WAS WRITTEN. SAID THIS NR IS GOING
- )
TO RE VOIDED. THIS IS THE KINO 0F THING THAT STARTS INVESTIGATIONS. THE CONTROL NUMBER, 5412e WAS REISSUED TO- ') ( ANOTHER NONCONFORMANCE. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/41-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). (- (I 35s/81s42-06 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE () (* I FEFL THAT' QA HANAGEMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT THE INSPECTION PROGRAM AT ZIM"ER. h15 SAID THING LINE, "0UR JOB HERE IS TO ACCFPT NOT REJECT, WE ARE HERE TO GET THIS PLANT ) (' , BUILT, WE ARE NOT RUILDING A CADILLAC, WE ARE BUILDING A FORD, DON'T RE NIT-PICKING IN YOUR INSPECTIONS.h COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/al-13 (INVFSTIGATION' REPORT). - I' COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. k' 358/81842-07 ALLEGATION ' ZIMMER SSE NOTE L) THE 04 MANAGER 00ES NOT RELIEVE THE WORD OF HIS INSPECTORS OVER k) () CONSTRUCTION, COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORTli COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUAL ITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. () ih '
7 ..
C . ..' C o
(, <3 \\ REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 ) C' PAGE 47 . IE REPORT No. 50-35a/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/m2 COMPUTER PRINTOUT PELATIVE TO NRC , COMRLETE LISTING ITEM RESOLUTION . g ITEM NO./ INSRECTOR/ ITFM TYPE / SACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CL0$E00T I KESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. RRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATFD NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') ( 358/81842-0A ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') FREQUENTLY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WILL HEAR THAT AN NR HAD ') ( BEEN WRITTEN IDENTIFY 1NG A QUALITY PROBLEM, THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION ON THIS SITE WILL GO TO THE INDIVIDUAL INSPECTOR OR LEAD INSPECTOR AND QUESTION HIM 04 THE REASON FOR HIS NR AND ') f WILL DISAGREE WITH THE INSPECTOR. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED PY {AL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. . . . 358/81843-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE (
- )
EVIDENCE OF BEER AND MARIJUANA AHUSE..HE WAS WARE OF ' GUN RAFFLES AND ROOKMAKING OPERAT!nNS ON SITE. t) . l COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 IINVESTIGATION REPORT). NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. ( - i) 358/81844-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE L) ( HE DISCOVERED THAT THE FILE FOR TME MAIN $ POOL PIECES WAS MIS $1NG. 04/15/M1 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). . l} ( COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. , , , . ( 358/81845-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMFR SEE NOTE I) ON OCCASION, WOULD ACCEPT 4 WFLD THAT REJECTED. - GI I 02/23/R1 . ' COVERF0 IN IE PEPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). C GD . 358/81e45-02 ALLEGATION ZIMkFR SEE NOTE UI (' SOME MELLOG WELDS DEFECTIVE. 02/23/81 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/a1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ID (8
G) ss ~ . ip s () . -s%
1 , r) (' e
. () (' , C' <3 I' PAGE 4R REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM '05/0T/82 ') COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE RFPORT No. 50-359/Al-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 . COMPLETE LISTING , ~ i ITEM RESOLUTION > g. ,) , ITEM NO./ . INSPECT 0p/ ITEM T YPF / FACILITY NAMF LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT f CESPONSE DUE' MODULE NO. HRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') SEE' NOTE ') I' 358/81845-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER ' . ' I HAVE HEEN DOUSED WITH WATER WHILE PERFORMING INSPECTION ') I OUTIES ON SITF. 02/24/a1 COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). i (' l 358/81845-04 ALLFGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ( A PIPE FITTER SAID HWE WILL REAT YOU FOR REJECTING THIS WELD". f) ' 02/24/Al COVERED IN IE REPT 50-354/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ) 358/81845-05 ALLEGATION ' ZIMMER. SEE NOTE ,) I FEEL THAT THE QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM ON THIS SITE IS NOT INDEPFNDENT. I WILL WRITE ** NR OH SURVEILLANCE REPORT I IDENTIFYING A NONCONFORMING ITEM. CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION ') WILL CALL ME OUT TO THE FIELD To QUESTION A4 NR THAT I HAVE WRITTEN. I FFEL THIS IMPACTS ON MY INDEPENDENCE. 02/24/R1 ' I COVERED IN IE PEPT 50-35A/al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). () ' COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAH. C C) 358/81545-0T ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE , () C , A DOCUMENTATION REVIEWER, WROTE A SURVEILLANCE REPORT CITING NO TRACEABILITY ON INDIVIOUAL PIPE COMPONENTS WHICH HE IDFNTIFIED AS, MISSING OURING HIS DOCUMENT REVIEWS. TO ( THE HEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS SR WAS NOT CONVERTED INTO A E) , NONCONFORMANCE REPORT AFTER THE 30 DAY PERIOD. 02/24/n1 COVERED IN IE PEPT 50-35A/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). (d COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. () ( 358/81846-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE CI DURING MY RECORD REVIEWS I HAVE NOTED THAT THE HEAT NUMBERS FOR () THE COMPONENTS ON THE 150 ARE NOT THE SAME HEAT NUMBER FOR THE II ACTUAL ITEM. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/Al-13 IINVFSTIGATION REPORT). Lj COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. () () ep ' - ~
? (s 9
' . ( () <) < PEGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/s2 $) I PAGE 49 , 50-359/41-13 IN RESPONSE To G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. COMPLETE LISTING , . ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIH INSPECTOR CLOSE0VT . - (' RESPONSE DUE -MODutE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. ') . f 358/41s46-02 ALLEGATInN ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') I HAVE REVIEWED ORAWINGS WITH FIVE REVISIONS TO THEM YET THE C) f SAME ITEM ON FIVE DRAWINGS WILL HAVE THREE DIFFERENT NEAT NUMBERS ASSIGNED TO IT. HOWFVER. THFRE ARE NO RECORDS OR NOTATIONS ON TME DRAWINGS THAT ANY COMPONENT WAS EVER HOVED. 3 f. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 IINVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ( '3 ~ 358/81846-03 ALLFGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE (I ( WELD ROD SLIP HEAT NUMHERS AND WELDER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS LISTED N THE SLIP DO NOT HATCH THE DELD ROD NUMBERS AND WELDER ID NOMRERS LISTED ON THE ISO THEY ARE AFFIXED 70 CI COVERED IN IE REPT 50-354/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ( CD 358/81846-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER , SEE NOTE ( I HAVE HEARD THAT IS RESOLVING THESE DISCREPANCIES CI .RY ARRITRARILY CHANGING NUMRERS ON THE 1508S TO RESOLVE THE EXCEPTION. FOR EXAMPLEe HE WILL GO TO A LIST OF HEAT NUMRERS 'I ( F0H -LET'S SAY EIGHT INCH PIPE AND SEE THAT IT IS A VALID NUMBER FOR AN EIGHT INCH PIPE. AND THEN ME WILL CHANGE THE ISO TO RFFLECT THE NFW HEAT NUMRER WHICH HAPPENS TO MATCH THE SAME (I ( DESCRIPTION AS THE 150 COVERED *IN IE REPT 50-354/R1-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. 358/81846-05 ALLFGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE , WILL ALSO TAME A WELD ROD NUMBER FROM.THE SLIP, CROSS'IT OUT IF IT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE ON THE 150, AND PUT IN A OI Nd NEW NUMaER ON THE SLIP WITHOUT VERIFYING WHICH NUMBER IS CORRECT. COVEREO IN IE REPT 50-358/R1-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). GP () COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ' cp s; -g , i ' ' ' --- - r ,
I '
r) C'
. . () ) , (' ') " . I' PAGE 50 REdION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82
- )
COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-354/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA-REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING , _ g , ITEM RESOLUTION , . ITEM NO./ INSRECTOR/ ITFM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT 'l (' RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. C 358/81846-06 ALLE G ATION ZIMMER - SEE NOTE 'l IS RESOLVING TMESE DISCREPANCIES THROUGH A PAPER REVIEW 'l ( WITHOUT FIELD VERIFICATION. DUE TO THIS ACTIVITYe I HAVE NO FAITH IN THE QC RECORDS HERE AT ZIMHFR. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT).
- )
( COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. f 358/81846-0T ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') ' SOCKET WELD FITUPS NOT CORRECT. ') C COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). a COVERFD BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ( ) 358/81#46-09 ALLEGATION ZIHMER SEE NOTE ) I DESIGN DOCUMENT CHANGES WERE NOT TRACKED PROPERLY ON SITE, THERE IS NO DOCUMENT VERIFICATION TO SHOW THAT THE CRAFTSMEN USED THF REVISED ODC TO WORK FROM WHEN FABRICATING A SYSTEHe IT } ( MAY OR MAY NOT RE WHAT Is REFLECTED IN THE DRAWING. THERE WAS NO REINSPFCTION AFTER CHANGES TO SEE IF THE HARDWARE MATCHED THE CHANGES HADE. . ') ( LOVERED !* IE PEPT 50-35R/Al-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED R IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ( s) 358/81846-12 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE A) ( SURVEILLANCE REPORTS ARE NOT BEING MADE INTO NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS AFTER THE REQUIRED 30 OAY PERIODe I HAVE REVIEWED PACKAGES WITH SURVEILLANCE REPORTS THAT ARE OVER A VEAR OLD k) (' IN THEM. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/RI-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. , C- ') c, ~ L) 1 I
y- - . p ) ,. . C a ' r 7 . f PAGE 51 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/82 - COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-358/Al-13 IN Resp 0NSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/m2 COMPLETE LISTING ' ITEM RESOLUTION ! ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT ( RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DFSCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. 9 I' 358/81848-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 'O INSPECTnRS WOULD' IDENTIFY PROBLEMS AND WOULO ISSUE A b NONCONFORMANCE REPORT, VET THE REPORT WOULD BE VOIDED IF IT 'O HFLD UP PRODUCTION, OR IF CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OHJECTED TO THF ISSUANCE OF THE NR RY THE QC INSPECTOR. IN ' O (, GENERAL. THE KAISER QC' MANAGER HAD BEEN CONVINCED BY ' CONSTRUCTION THAT HIS QC INSPECTORS WERE UNQUALIFIED OR WERE WRONG WHEN ISSUING NR85. O f COVEHED IN IE REPT 50-35a/Al-13 IINVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL' PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. . C 3 358/81848-05 ALLEGATION ZIHMER SEE tt0TE ' 3 (' NRe5 WERE VOIDED WITHOUT CAUSE. ,0
COVERED IN IE REPT 50-359/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ' COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRNATION PROGRAM. , 358/81#48-08 ALLEGATION ZIMMER ,SEE NOTE , THERE ARE NO HEAT NUMRERS FOR MATERIAL TRACEABILITY FOR STRUCTURAL ~ STEEL IN THE CA8LE SPREADING ROOM. g 35A/81849-01' ALLEGATION ZIHMFR SEE NOTE INOICATIONS OF ALCOHOL ABUSE. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35A/41-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). 358/81849-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE , I RECALL HEARING AHOUT A TRAILER RWFAM-IN.
COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35n/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). O b NOI WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. O 358/81850-01 ALLEGATION ZIHHER SEE NOTE O s INDICATIONS OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG ARilSF.
@ V COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT).. ') . , g O
V .
- ~
c) cs - . w (? } ' ' c- . . P) I PAGE 52 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 ') COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-35A/81-13 IN RESRONSE TO G.A.P. FotA REQUEST OF 04/20/AP , COMPLETE LISTING ~ s , ITEM RESOLUTION (' 'l , , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / EACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE0UT I' RESPONSE DUE MODULE No. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. ') _ __ (' 358/81/50-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') I SEEM TO RECALL AN INCIDENT INVOLVING A BREAK-IN TO A TRAILERe f' ALTHOUGH I CANNOT RECALL WHETHER IT INVOLVED A PEABODY- () ' MAGNAFLUX TRAILER. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). r) (* NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. f 358/81#50-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I) INDIVIDUAL J. AT TIMESe JUDGING BY THE LOOK OF HIS EYES. IT ) b APPEARED HE MAY HAVE BEEN ORINKING.- COVERED IN IE REPT 50-359/91-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). PERSONAL OPINION OF INDIVIOUAL OR NO APPARENT SUBSTANCE. 358/81851-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SIE N0'TE ) INDICATIONS OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG ARUSE. , COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). .
358/81#51-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE I AM PERSONALLY AWARE THAT FIREARMS WERE BEING RAFFLED OFF IN , A LOTTERY SQUARE TYPE FASHION. I' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REP,0RT). ' N) NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. '4D () 358/81851-05 ALLFGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE L) II REGARDING YOH'S SECURTIY LE AD OFF ICERe . INDIVIDUAL Je IN MY e OPINION DURING TWO OCCASIONS HE SHOWED UP FOR WORK, NE WAS VERY INT 0XICATED. BASED ON THE SMELL OF HIS BREATH AND HIS () Id . CONDUCT. I ALSD RELIEVE HE WAS SOMEdHAT INT 0XICATED ON OTHER OCCASIONS. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/RI-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). ) . n . N QJ o e a t..
- ,
7 2m
~ , , O
. ) (
. r' ') . ' PAGE 53 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/A2 CONFUTER PRINTOUT RELAT!vE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-354/81-13 IN RESPONSE TO 8.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING _ _ ITEM RESOLUTION ITEM No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / rACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSE00T . .) ( RESPONSE DUE M000(E NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT NO. , (' 358/81852-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE il ' INDICATIONS OF ALCOHOL USE, IN THAT A LOT OF WORKERS SHELLED OF
- )
( ALCOHOL AND S0"E APPEARED TO BE SOMEWMAT INT 0XICATED. ON APPROXIMATELY THREE OCCASIONS I OMSERVED WORKERS WHO IN HY OPINION WERE INT 0XICATED TO THE POINT WHERE THEIR ABILITY TO ) ( PE RFORM THEIR JOB WAS IMPAIRED. I HAVE OBSERVED INDIVIDUALS ' uno IN HY CPIM!04. APPEARED TO HE INT 0XICATED OR STONED ON SOMETHING OTHER-THAN ALCOHOL. ') ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/R1-13 (INVESTI6ATION REPORT 3. - ( 358/81a52-02 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE
- )
A SECURITY OFFICER RECAME ILL DUE TO INHALATION OF GAS NEAR THE () (. RFACTOR DURING OCTORER 19RO. (MAPO GASI COVERED IN IE REPT 50,354/Al-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). ( C) 354/81s52-03 ALLEGATION ZIpuER SEE NOTE NI ( ' INDIVIDUALS LEAVING THE PLANT WITH REER AND WITHOUT ' IntNTIFICATION CARDS OR VISITOR PASSFS. APPARENTLY THE FIRST SHIFT DID NOT CHECK IDENTIFICATION OR ISSUE PASSES AT THE TIME. - () I THEY ENTERED THE PLANT. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT).
NOT WITHIN NRC PURVIEW. g) 358/81853-01 ALLkGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ELECTRICAL CARLE TRAYS WERE OVERFILLF0, CABLES WERE NOT LINED ~ UP PROPERLY, CARLES WERE PULLED IN INCOMPLETE RACEWAYS. (3 k COVERED IN IE PEPT 50-15R/RI-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT 3. COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. COVERED IN LI FNSING HEARINGS. . cs t) ' f a s / g , =a ' A - M
._ . __ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - , - (' . 0 -' r) .' . , (2 () , . ( /) C' PAGE SA REGION III TRACMING SYSTEM 05/07/82 - ') I COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-35R/RI-13 IN RFSPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA PEQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING ,
ITEM RESOLUTION , , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITFM TYpF/ FACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT I. RESPONSE 000~ MODULE NO. RRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNE0 REPORT No. 'I ( 358/8 #56-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER < SEE NOTE
- )
ELECTRICAL CARLE PANS ARE OVERLOADED. ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVFSTIGATI'ON REPORT). () ' COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS. s COVERED IN LICENSING HEARINGS. , 358/81#6T-02 ALLEGATION ZIkMER SEE NOTE . ELECTRICAL CARLE TRAYS ARE OVERLOADED AND OVERFILLED YET QC . , INSPECTORS WERE TOLD TO NOT WRITE NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS FOR ' '3 C' THESF DEFICIENCIES. - COVERE3 IN IE REPT 50-358/Rl=13 (INVESTIGATION REPORTI. COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS, ') II COVEHED IN LICFNSING HEARINGS. - t I' 358/81#6T-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMEW SEE NOTE 'I , QA MANAGER TOLD QC INSPECTORS TO ACCEPT, NOT . II I REJECT ITEMS. COVEHED IN IE REPT 50-158/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT).
COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. . 358/81867-04 ALLEGATION ZI"MER SEE NOTE , , ' QC INSPECTION PROCEDURE S ALLOW INSPECTING OF PAINTED OR GALVINIZED WELDS. WHEN THIS IS CONTRARY TO CODE REQUIREMENTS. i I' COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). II , ( COVERED HY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. c. <, -= - , 358/81#68-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE kl ELECTRICAL CARLE TRAYS ARE OVERFILLED AND IN SOME CASES CABLES II HANG OVER THF SIDES. - COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). II kd COVERED IN PAST NRC REPORTS.
COVEHED IN LICENSING HEARINGS. () (s dp ' () ' ' r h
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ') ,p + e(' ') , m (' ) PAGE 55 . REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/0T/82 i COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT No. 50-358/RI-13 IN RESPONSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF CA/20/m2 COMPLETE LISTING ,. ITEM RESOLUTION ITEH No./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / 5ACILITY NAME LICENSEE INTERIM INSDECTOR CLOSE007 C f RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTION ASSIGNED REPORT No. . ( 358/81869-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') ' POOR WELDING ON STRUCTURAL STEEL IN VARIOUS AREAS OF THE PLANT. 3, ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRNATION PROGRAW. ( CI 358/81sT3-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ') b NA ARE VOIDED IMPROPERLY AND SURVFILLANCE REPORTS HAVE NOT BEEN MADE INTO NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS AFTER 30 DAYS. COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT).
- )
I COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ( 58/818T3-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 3 PROCEDURES FOR THE REINSRECTION OF PIPE SUPPORT HANGERS ARE ') ( INADEQUATE RECAUSE THE QA MANAGER SAID TO INSPECT FOR CONFIGURATION AND LOCATION ONLY ann N0f FOR TRACEABILITY OF MATERIALS OR ACCEPTARILITY OF WELDS. ALSO, QC INSPECTORS HAVE CD I HEEN TOLD NOT To ACCEPT VENDOR SUPPLIED WELOS. COVEHED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORT). COVERED H/ IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. 358/81sTA-03 ALLEGATION 21MMER SEE NOTE SURVE ILLANCE REPORTS HAVE NOT BEE N TURNED INTO NONCONFORMANCE RFPORTS IN 10 DAYS. 6I ( COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35a/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). COVERED BY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. ( dI ~ 35G/81s81-01 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE GI I' QC INSPECTOR DOUSEn w1TH WATER. RUMORS THAT MAD DOUSED QC INSPECTORS. . . COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/Al-13 (INVESTIGATION REPORT). , k '. 6 s ./.hp = - .- - __ __ ,__'!? 2
___. . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . c , ig. . C' t , , PAGE 56 REGION III TRACKING SYSTEM 05/07/m2 COMPUTER PRINTOUT RELATIVE TO NRC IE REPORT NO. 50-35R/RI-13 IN Resp 0NSE TO G.A.P. FOIA REQUEST OF 04/20/82 COMPLETE LISTING ' . ITEM RESOLUTION (' ~) , ITEM NO./ INSPECTOR / ITEM TYPE / FACILITY NAML LICENSEE INTERIM INSPECTOR CLOSEOUT ,)< ( RESPONSE DUE MODULE NO. BRIEF DESCRIPTION DESIGNATED NO. INSPECTIGN ASSIGNED REPORT NO. f 3S8/81s88-03 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE ,[[ ISOMETRIC DRAWING ON $ MALL ROPE LINES DID NOT HAVE TRACEARILITY I 0F HEAT NUMBERS AND MAY HAVE REEN CAUSED BY INSPECTORS NOT I) MAKING A PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF REMOTE AREAS OF A SYSTEM. THIS s WAS PREVALENT IN THE FIRST SYSTEMS TURNED OVER BY KAISER IN C WHICH THE 00CUuENTATION DID NOT MATCH THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF I) THE PLANT. (OIA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-358/RI-13 (!NVESTIGATION REPORT). ( COVEPED RY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. $) - C 358/81#88-04 ALLEGATION ZIMMER SEE NOTE 9 ' OURING IN-PROCESS INSPECTIONS HEAT NUMBERS ON SMALL RORE SYSTEM , (. WEQE RECORDED ON ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS RUT THEY DID NOT I SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY WHICH NUMRER hENT TO WHICH PIECE OF PIPE. OR IF ONE HEAT NUMBER WAS RECORDED IT WAS ASSUMED AFTER THE {' FACT THAT'!T APPLIED To EVERY PIECF OF PIPE ON THE DRAWING THIS 'I. WAS PREVALENT IN THE R AV-! SYSTE M. (OIA) COVERED IN IE REPT 50-35R/81-13 (INVFSTIGATION REPORTI. ( COVERED RY IAL PROVISIONS OR QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM. (I (- GD (- - Ch . 1 1 k' Ch ( - () Ci () s U v G . }}