ML20058E618

Documents 810513 Discussion W/T Daniels Re Facility.Basis for Shutdown of Project Should Be Evaluated

ML20058E618
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	05/14/1981
From:	Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20058A387	List: IR 05000358/1976002 IR 05000358/1980009 ML20058A383 ML20058A389 ML20058A627 ML20058E546 ML20058E555 ML20058E558 ML20058E566 ML20058E570 ML20058E578 ML20058E582 ML20058E588 ML20058E592 ML20058E596 ML20058E600 ML20058E611 ML20058E615 ML20058E618 ML20058E622 ML20058E627 ML20058E630 ML20058E632 ML20058E642 ML20058E653 ML20058E668 ML20058E677 ML20058E688 ML20058E695 ML20058E711 ML20058E728 ML20058E731 ML20058E750 ML20058E769 ML20058E776 ML20058E787 ML20058E793 ML20058E801 ML20058E808 ML20058E816 ML20058E828 ML20058E833 ML20058E843 ML20058E850 ML20058E856 ML20058E861 ML20058E869 ML20058E879 ML20058E898 ML20058E923 ... further results
References
FOIA-82-206 NUDOCS 8207300128
Download: ML20058E618 (1)

Text

-

/

'o UNITED STATES g

4, s.

E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

&2-

.. E REGION lla

['

I o,

799 ROOSEVELT ROAD g~..%,-

CLEN ELtVN,ILLINols 60137 Hay 14, 1981 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Zimmer File (Deputy Director's Office)

FROM:

A. Bert Davis, Deputy Director

SUBJECT:

DISCUSSION WITH TOM DANIELS, SRI, ZIMMER During the Resident Inspector's Social Hour last night (5/13/81) I had a lengthy discussion with Tom concerning Zimmer.

Tom stated that his position with respect to Zimmer is that it should be shut down until all their problems are corrected.

He had previously taken this position at my visit to Zimmer a couple of months ago.

As near as I could tell Tom's reasons were primarily based on the fact that personnel at the site who have made past errors and involved in past problems are in the most part still there.

Therefore, continued errors could occur.

I discussed with Tom the Innediate Action Letter and attempted to get him to be specific as to whether or not future work is adequately controlled by the IAL.

As I attempted to become specific with respect to his concerns, it anneared that his position was primarily based on a gut feel and a mistrust of the Kaiser and CG&E organization and people.

The only specific he could come up with with respect to whether or not future work not being properly controlled was a preliminary finding that a number of noncomformance reports were being piled up rather than being promptly reviewed.

He based this on a statement made to him by a Mr. Haas.

When he pursued it with Mr. Schwiers, he was told that the noncomformance reports were being reviewed and that the ones in question were planned to be reviewed that night by i

Mr. Schwiers.

Tom indicated that before he made this a finding, he wanted to pursue it further.

I asked him to do that and provide the information to me.

Based on Tom's feelin:;, I believe it is necessary to oursue it to get details, i

so that we can determine 3hether or not there is a basis for shutting down the project.

Ad A. Bert Davis Denuty Director l

8207300128 820609 PDR FOIA l

DEVINE82-206 PDR l

-