ML20049H588

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 820104-07
ML20049H588
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Dresden, Quad Cities
Issue date: 02/16/1982
From: Norelius C, Orelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20049H582 List:
References
50-237-82-02, 50-237-82-2, 50-249-82-01, 50-249-82-1, 50-254-82-02, 50-254-82-2, 50-265-82-02, 50-265-82-2, NUDOCS 8203030330
Download: ML20049H588 (2)


Text

' Appendix NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-237 Docket No. 50-249 Docket No. 50-254 Docket No. 50-265 As a result of the inspection conducted on January 4-7, 1982, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violations were identified:

1.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V,. states in part that, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed in documented instructions, procedures, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings."

Commonwealth Edison' Company Topical Report CE-1-A, " Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations," Revision 15, dated January 2, 1981, states in Section 5 that "The quality assurance actions carried out for design, construction, testing, and operation activities will be described in documented instructions, procedures, drawings, speci-fications, or checklists. These documents will assist personnel in assuring that important. activities have been performed. These documents will also reference applicable acceptance criteria which must be satisfied to assure that the quality related activity has been properly carried out."

Contrary to the above, the EDS IE Bulletin 79-14 evaluation procedure did not specify that (1) an operability analysis be performed for'the l

piping suspension system prior to declaring the system to be operable, and (2) safety relief valve thrust loads be included in the piping stress calculations.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

~

2.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part that, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed in documented instructions, procedures, or drawings...and shall be accomplished in accordance with i

these instructions, procedures, or drawings."

Commonwealth Edison Company Topical Report CE-1-A, " Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations," Revision 15, dated January 2, 1981, states in Section 5' that "The quality assurance actions carried out for design, construction, testing, and operation activities will be described in documented instructions, procedures, drawings, speci-fications,-or checklists. These documents will assist personnel in assuring that important activities have been performed. These documents will also reference applicable acceptance criteria which must be satisfied to assure that the quality related activity has been properly carried out."

82O3030330 820216 PDR ADOCK 05000237 G

PDR

i l

I Appendix The Bechtel Power Corporation IE Bulletin 79-14 walkdown inspection procedure established for Dresden and Quad Cities requires that pipe whip restraint clearance should be measured in the same manner as for sleeves and penetrations, giving sufficient dimensions to locate the pipe position in the sleeve.

Contrary to the above, the pipe whip restraint gaps were not measured during the IE Bulletin 79-14 system walkdown inspection.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written state-ment or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or af firmation.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

[ j,j 1 gp

.!y!c:!IgC.T.' n;h Dated C. E. Norelius, Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection I