ML20062K230
| ML20062K230 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 12/09/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062K222 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-254-93-26, 50-265-93-26, NUDOCS 9312210237 | |
| Download: ML20062K230 (1) | |
Text
.
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265 Quad Cities Station, Units 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 1 through November 5, 1993, a
violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1993), the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria XVI requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected.
In the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition.
Contrary to the above, corrective actions taken to ensure that appropriate documentation is in place prior to performance of plant activities, in response to a December 1992 unauthorized installation of a tygon tubing, were inadequate. On October 4, 1993, the licensee performed an unauthorized test of the computer room heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) in-line duct heaters.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement of explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555 with a copy to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III, 799 Roosevelt Road, Glen Ellyn, Illinois, 60137, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Quad Cities Nuclear Station within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation or,' if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified,, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Glen Ellyn, Illinois this $ day of December 1993 9312210237 931209 PDR ADOCK 05000254 G
PDR.,
.