ML20149K161

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 970318-0505.Violation Noted:Operations Surveillance Procedure 690016-16 Transfer of Bus 1b from MCC 1 to MCC 2, Rev 9 Was Not Distributed to Control Room Where Operators Were Performing Surveillance
ML20149K161
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/07/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20149K149 List:
References
50-254-97-06, 50-254-97-6, 50-265-97-06, 50-265-97-6, NUDOCS 9707300024
Download: ML20149K161 (3)


Text

._ _ . - . .-. - ._ _ - . . _ ._ _ _ , _ _ _ _ __.- ~

i*

NOTICE OF VIOLATION l Commonwealth Edison Company - Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265 _,

Quad Cities Station, Units 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30 i e l During an NRC inspection conducted on March 18 through May 5,1997, violations of NRC ]

requirements were identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and  !

Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG 1600, the violations are listed below:

1. Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, " Document Control," requires, in
part, " Measures shall be established to control the issuance of procedures, including '

changes. These measures shall assure that procedures including changes are

distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed."

, Quad Cities Administrative Procedure (OCAP) 1100-12, " Procedure Use and 4

Adherence," Revision 12, Step D.4.c.1 requires using the most current revision of i the procedure.

0 l

Contrary to the above, I i-

!- a. On April 9,1997, Quad Cities Operations Surveillance Procedure (OOS) 6900-16, " Transfer of Bus 1B from MCC (motor control center] 1 to

} MCC 2," Revision 9, was not distributed to the control room where I operators were performing the surveillance. 1 i

! b. On April 9,1997, OOS 6900-16, " Transfer of Bus 1B From MCC 1 to i MCC 2," Revision 8, was used by a control room operator when the most i recent revision was Revision 9.

i I This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1). (50-254 265/97006-01)

2. Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.A required applicable procedures recommended in

! - Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978 be implemented.

? Appendix A, Paragraph 3.w references procedures for surveillance tests of the j_ emergency power system.

Quad Cities Operating Surveillance Procedure 6500-3, Step C.1.t required the

, operator to verify; at the 901-8 panel, that Busses 14-1 and 241 tie breaker was j closed.

i l

Contrary to the above, on April 15,1997, operators did not properly implement

. procedure OOS 6500-3, "4 kV Bus 14-1 Undervoltage Functional Test." The operator initialed Step C.1.t as completed but failed to verify that the breaker was j closed. The breaker was in the open position.

4 This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I). (50-254;265/97006-02) 9707300024 970707 ~ -

PDR-G ADOCK 05000254

_ PM

3 Notice of Violation 3. Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVil, " Quality Assurance Records,"

requires, in part, that sufficient records shall be maintained to furnish evidence of activitios affecting quality. Records shall be identifiable and retrievable. Consistent with applicable regulatory requirements, the licensee shall establish requirements concerning record retention, such as duration, location, and assigned responsibility.

Commonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Program Topical Report CE-1-A, Revision 65b, Section 17, " Quality Assurance Records," states, in part, that the quality records program includes those record types, controls, and provisions for storage and preservation contained in Nuclear Quality Assurance (NOA) -1, Supplement 17S-1. Records are administered through a system which includes an index of record type, retention period, and storage location. Record retention periods are established to meet regulatory requirements.

American National Standards Institute /American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ANSI /ASME) NOA-1, " Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities," Supplement 17S-1 states, in part, that a records receipt control system shall include a method for identifying recorda receivad.

Quad Cities Administrative Procedure 1200-01, Revision 1, " Station Records,"

Step D.2, states that the res,3onsible department records custodian shall update the master retention schedule wMn e new record is created. Step D.2.a stated that the records custodian determined if toe new record was a quality or non-quality record.

Contrary to the above, on March 31,1997, the inspectors identified that the master retention schedule had not been updated to include new quality records.

The licensee failed to identify required quality assurance records and failed to establish requirements for record retention, including duration and assigned responsibility for quality records. The following procedures contain required quality records (operability determinations and surveillance results) not listed on the retention schedule:

  • Quad Cities Chemistry Procedure (OCCP) 1200-2, " Post LOCA (loss of coolant accident] Hydrogen and Oxygen Monitoring System" e Quad Cities Instrument Surveillance Procedure (OCIS) 2400-1, "Drywell Radiation Monitor Calibration and Functional Test"

( This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I). (50-254;265/97006-03) l

e Notice of Violation 3- I

4. Title 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," required, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to 4

quality, such as malfunctions, are promptly identified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, from June 1996 until March 1997, the licensee failed to take prompt corrective action to address periodic high differential pressure readings I that clearly indicated that the 28 core spray room cooler was significantly clogged.

During this time, Quad Cities continued to operate with one train of core spray l significantly degraded and its effect on safe operation went unevaluated. '

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1). (50-254;265/97006-07)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement of explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1 ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region Ill, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is I the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicato the specific information that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this ay of June,1997 5