ML20041B128

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LOCA Analysis for Peach Bottom APS Unit 2, Errata 7
ML20041B128
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/1981
From:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20041B124 List:
References
NEDO-24081-ERR, NEDO-24081-ERR-07, NEDO-24081-ERR-7, NUDOCS 8202230300
Download: ML20041B128 (7)


Text

L-

. . - .. . . .. . . .... . + . .

l s1s. m m...: m ssa, GENER Alh ELECTRIC APPLICABLE TO:

mn -x " '

eue ue nio~ ~o.

ERRATA And ADDENDA

r. E no. 77nn3ss SHEET 737tg LOCA Analysis for Peach 7

Bottom APS Unit 2 Novebu 19M NO TE: Correct all copies of the applicable uS5uE D ATE DeCe~ bet 197I pJblication as spectfied below.

REFERENCES ITE M O A E pjSEC 9gc A t E) (COR RECT NS AN ADDITIONS)

1. Page v/vi Replace with revised page v/vi.
2. Page 3-1/3-2 Replace with revised page 3-1/3-2.
3. Page 4-3 Replace with revised page 4-3.
4. Page 4-11 Replace with revised page 4-11.
5. Page 4-12 Replace with revised page 4-12.
6. Page 4-13/4-14 Add new page 4-13/4-14.

(Change bars in right-hand margin indicate where report has been revised.)

l 1

PAGE 1 8202230300 820219 PDR ADOCK 05000277 P PDR

~

LIST OF TABLES Table Title Py 3-1 Significant Input Parameters to the Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis 3-1 4-1 Summary of Results 4-5 4-2 LOCA Analysis Figure Summary 4-6 4-3a MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-7 4-3b MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-8.

4-3c MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-9 4-3d ~ MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-10 MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-11 4-3e 4-3f MAPLHCR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-11 4-3g MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure . 4-12, 4-3h MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure- 4-12 4-31 MAPLHGR Versus Average Planar Exposure 4-13/4-14 v/vi

a .

3. INPUT TO ANALYSIS A list of the significant plant input parameters to the LOCA analysis is presented in Table 3-1.

~

Table 3-1 SIGNIFICANT INPUT PARAMETERS TO THE LOSS-OF-COOLANT ACCIDENT ANALYSIS Plant Parameters:

Core Thermal Power 3440 MWt, which corresponds to 105% of rated steam flow Vessel Steam Output 14.05 x 106 lbm/h, which corresponds to 105% of rated steam flow

~

Vessel Steam Dome Pressure 1055 psia Recirculation Line Break Area for farge Breaks - Discharge 1.9 ft 2 DBA)

- Suction 4.1 ft 2 ((DBA)

Number of Drilled Bundles 360 Fuel Farameters:

Peak Technical Initial Specification Design Minimum Lit. ear Heat Axial Critical Fuel Bundle Generation Rate Peaking Power Fuel Type Geometry (kW/ft) Factor Ratio A. IC Type 2 7x7 18.5 1.5 1.2 B. IC Type 3 7x7 18.5 1.5 1.2 C. 8D274L 8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2 D. 8D274H 8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2 E. LTA260 8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2 F. 8DRB284 L 8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2 G. P8DRB284H 8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2 H. P8DRB285 8x8 13.4 1.4 1.2 I. P8DRB299 0x8 13.4 1.4 1.2

  • To account for the 2% uncertainty in bundle power required by Appendix K, the SCAT calculation is performed with an MCPR of 1.18 (i.e., 1.2 divided by 1.02) for a bundle with an initial MCPR of 1.20.

3-1/3-2

4.5 RESULTS Or THE CRASTE ANALYSIS e

This code is used, with suitable inputs from the other codes, to calculate the fuel cladding heatup rate, peak cladding temperature, peak local cladding oxidation, and core-wide metal-water reaction for large breaks. The detailed fuel model in CHASTE considers transient gap conductance, clad swelling and rupture, and metal-water reaction.' The empirical core spray heat transfer and channel wetting correlations are built into CRASTE, which solves the transient heat transfer equations for the entire LOCA transient at a single axial plane in a single fuel assembly. Iterative applications of CHASTE determine the maximum permissible planar power where required to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.46 acceptance criteria.

The CHASTE results presented are:

e Peak Cladding Temperature versus time e Peak Cladding Temperature versus Break Area e Peak Cladding Temperature and Peak Local Oxidation versus Planar

~

Average Exposure for the most limiting break size e Maximum Average Planar Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR) versus Planar Average Exposure for the most limiting break size A summary of the analytical results is given in Table 4-1. Table 4-2 lists the figures provided for this analysis. The MAPLHGR values for each fuel type in the PB-2 core are presented in Tables 4-3a through 4-31. l 4-3

l 1 Table 4-3 e MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE Plant: PB-2 Fuel Type: LTA260 Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT 0xidation (Mwd /c) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction 200 11.4 1829 0.007 1,000 11.5 1839 0.008 5,000 12.1 1913 0.010 10,000 12.2 1929 0.011 15,000 12.3 1958 0.012 20,000 12.1 1961 6.012 25,000 11.7 1911 0.010 30,000 11.3 1882 0.009 35,000 10.3 1752 0.006 40,000 9.7 1678 0.004 45,000 9.1 1603: 0.003 50,000 8.5 1567 0.002 Table 4-3f MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE Fuel Type: SDRB284L l Md Exposure MAPLEGR PCT Oxidation (MVd/t) (kW/fc) ('F) Fraction 200 11.3 1858 0.009 1,000 11.3 1862 0.009 5,000 11.8 1926 0.011 10,000 12.0 1937 0.011 15,000 12.0 1947 0.012 20,000 11.6 1910 0.010 25,000 10.9 1828 0.008 30,000 10.2 1751 0.006 35,000 9.6 1676 0.004 40,000 8.9 1600 0.003 4-11

..).-

c.

3 Table 4-3g i MAPLHGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLGAR EXPOSL%E Fuel Type: P8DRB284H*

Average Planar Exposure MAPLEGR PCT 0xidation

(%'d/t) (kW/ft) (*F) Fraetion 200 11.2 1861 0.003 1,000 11.2 1865 0.008 5,000 11.7 1903 0.010 10,000 12.0 1938 0.011 15,000 12.0 1938 0.011 20,000 11.5 1907 0.011 25,000 10.8 1823 0.007 30,000 10.1 1744 0.005 35,000 9.6 1665 0,004 40,000 9.0 1589 0,003

  • Applicable to 80, 100, and 120 mil channels Table 4-3h

' MAPLHCR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE Fuel Type: P8DRB285 Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT Oxidation ON'd/t) (kW/f t) (DF) Fraction 200 11.0 1826 0.008 1,000 11.1 1836 0.008 5,000 11.9 1924 0',011 10,000 12.2 1948 0.012 15,000 12.1 7043 0.011 20,000 11.7 502 0.010 25,000 11.0 818 0.007 30,000 10.3 1740 0.005 35,000 9.7 1667 o,004 40,000 9.1 1592 0,003 4-12

t' Table 4-31 MAPLEGR VERSUS AVERAGE PLANAR EXPOSURE Plant: PB-2 Fuel Type: P8DRB299 Average Planar Exposure MAPLHGR PCT Oxidation (kW/ft) (*F) Fraction (Mud /t) 200 10.9 1800 0.007 1,000 11.0 1804 0.007 5,000 11.5 1851 0.008 10,000 12.2 1933 0.011 15,000 12.3 1962 0.012 20,000 12.3 1965 0.012 25,000 11.9 1932 0.011 30,000 11.4 1864 0.009 35,000 10.9 1799 0.007 40,000 10.4 1744 0.005 45,000 10.0 1689 0.004 l

l 4-12/4-14 f