ML20055J323

Decommissioning Rept of Philadelphia Electric Co

ML20055J323
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	07/20/1990
From:	Rimerman M PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:
Shared Package
ML18095A378	List: ML18095A376 ML18095A379 ML20055J323 ML20055J327 ML20055J329
References
NUDOCS 9008020096
Download: ML20055J323 (31)

Text

_ ;__----_________.__.....

4 3

ki,.

4 DEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In:The Matter Of Philadelphia Electric Company B6cket No. 50-171 (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station :

Unit 1)

Decommissioning Report of Philadelphia Electric Company In accordance with SS 50.33(k) and 50.75(b) of the Regulations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (" Commission"), Philadelphia Electric Company (" Company") hereby submits this Decommissioning Report and states as follows:

1) Under Commission. License No..DPR-12, the Company is currently authorized to possess, but not to operate,_ Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 1.

2) Peach Bottom Unit 1 is a permanently shut-down high temperature gas-cooled demonstration power reactor which is located at a site in York County, Pennsylvania adjacent to the Company's Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 3 which are two currently operating boiling water reactors.

3) Peach Bottom Unit 1 is a 200 MW (thermal) reactor which was operated from June 1967 to October 31, 1974.

All spent fuel has been removed from the reactor site and the spent fuel pool has been f

drained and decontaminated.

All radioactive 11gulds have been removed and accessible areas of the facility have been 9008020096 900726 PDR ADOCK 03000171 PDC

2

(

p.-

decontaminated.

The company-is presently < licensed to maintain-the facility in-its present condition so as to allow it to be-subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit release of the facility for unrestricted use.

The present possession only license will remain in effect until December 24, 2015.

4) The Company hereby certifies that financial assurance for decommissioning Peach Bottom Unit 1 subsequent to its maintenance in SAFSTOR condition under its existing license will be provided in the amount of $18,084,000,- The amount of required decommissioning funding is-based -upon. art engineering. estimate of the costs necessary to finally decommission the facility.

The cost estimate is set forth in the report which-is attached. hereto and marked Exhibit A-1.

1 Exhibit A-1 consists:of those portions of a decommissioning study, performed for all of the-nuclear units in which the Company has an ownership. interest, which relate to. Peach Bottom Unit 1.

5) The cost estimate provided in Exhibit A-1, originally performed in 1984, has been updated to reflect costs in 1990 dollars.

The calculation of this amount is set forth in Exhibit A-2 and an. explanation of the methodology used for the calculation is set forth in Exhibit A-1,

6) The Company will provide financial assurance for decommissioning Peach Bottom Unit 1 by making payments, at least annually commencing in 1991, into an external sinking fund, consisting of.a decommissioning escrow account to be established

=-

t e

3 j'

1

a pursuant!to'an: escrow agreement datad December.31, 1984,.a true and correct copy of.which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit B.

< A-certification ofithe-authority of the signatory,to execute-this agreement on behalf of the Company is attached hereto.and marked'

~

Exhibit C.

7) A' schedule'of payments for implementing'the met hod of providing assurance of the availability of funds for decommiseloning Peach Bottom Unit l'is set forth in Exhibit D; hereto.

8.

The-Company will adjust the cost estimates provided in, Paragraph 4:.and: Exhibit A-1, at least annually,...using the.

methodology set forth in Exhibit A-1.

At least once every five years theischedules in Exhibit D will be revised-to reflect changes in the cost estimates from prior years and the engineering study of decommissioning will^be reviewed and updated as necessary to reflect-changesiin' technology and changes in plant status.

. PHILADELPHIA-ELECTRIC COMPANY

/

BY:

[

d' 7(8tL -

Vice President 7 , /NO DATED:

L e V

i

+

~ EXHIBIT A -l:

s4 i.

L e

PEACH BOTTOM UNIT 1 DECOMMISSIONING COST v

>I;'

o j-5 NUS CORAC AATION

w a

v k;@

y~-

~

a E

.- l hN M zn

,V s

t 1

i

-m,

>p y

1 W M N*I A)

INT'RO'DtJiC TION

?

m y s'

+

r

.,. i Y

' c Piach Bottomlunit l wasjthe first prototyp'e high-temperature gas cooled react 6r built-

,U (y., >

in thetunited Stateshit.was a 40tMWelectric unit built in'1966';and operated for seven j

a

~

?d fears.J At the cornpletion of operation ~1n October,1974, the, plant was ' decommissioned' y4 4

by the: entombment' method.? Total cost for entombment modifications wa's $3,520,000 '

[%

i as stated'in' the ' final decommission' report issued by Catalytic,'Inc.z 4

m J

}

[%)

y..

9

[ ' @% u Theientombment method requires that a possessionionlyL lic'e l

)periodis surycillarice not hthe - buildings,thata contain activatedS or contaminated i'

I

$ -M, components.-

C y

=

.a C4 m

'I

~

w m:

P - M

5'ince Peach Bottom Unit.! [silocated physically;on the'samensite as Peach Bottom g

,1 y

LUnitsl2 and:3l ltlIs necessary' t'o comptete the 'decommluloning of Unit.1:before the.

h~,

< site license can be terminated.-

a J

&e4;-

W y JAn' estimate of LtheLeost to remove ~ Feach Bottom Unit" Isis presented:in.this report.

e-1 u

'.;4 (Peach BottomiUnit Tdecommissioning;was consideredrto bera: separate decommission-T h [m s ilng activity. not connected fwith' th'e decommissioning /of. Peach' Bottom Units 2 and :3.

i 1) 44 Whe' major assumptions Jused s to? evelop' thesel costs; are sthe same.. used lIori. Peach d

Bottom = Units 2 and 3 and are presented on Page 3-2 as app!! cable to Unit 1.

'a a

,y 2.0 '

MAJOR DIFFERENCES IN DESIGN!

[Qf -

(The design of Peach' Bottom Unit'l differs from the design:of a conventional PWRior-R f

n v%e LBWR in a number!of significant ways which affect comparative analysis of decommis.

l s

Ik; C-sioning {coits; Substantial differences exist in the' areas of si:ei function, reactor

[

idesign, ~constructlen, and plant ilfe.

~

y,

{

i g

U Q

4

' l1

?S:::el. Peach Bottom Unit 1"is' a40 MWelectric plant. This is approximately.1/26 the -

k;

• jpowerLoutput of Peach Bottom Unit 2. - The turbine is smaller. due to: lower power and'

~

$pWe fMetter; steam conditions which a!! owed us of-a 3600 RPM design. ~ Other plant systemse Q@;g}'

fare also substantia!!y' smaller.

r o

j

' Furiction l-Peach Bottom Unit 1 was a joint venture between the AEC and PECo.to 3

y:;f

build'a working prototype of a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. As such, many of

?

4

. fj..

L -

Page 1

+ '"'

NUS CCppC AtJCN s

' p &+ :. g <u

,X i

-i

,oc

I 1

i f,

are placed on current commercial l.<

the systems and redundancy reqairements that operation units were either not applicable or nonexistent at the time the station was bullt. The low pow c level and planned limited lif e made it not feasible to build an extensive power station typical of a current PWR or BWR.

Reactor Desicn - The Peach Bottom Unit I reactor was cooled by high-temperature helium gas. There are no water borne contaminents originating in the reactor. The result is a much cleaner plant in terms of overall contamination. The low thermal rating allows for a smaller reactor vessel with thinner walls.

Construction - The containment building at Peach Bottom Unit 1 is a steel dome. The massive reinforced concrete and steel containment vessel typical of current PWR and BWR plants does not exist. Also, there are no cooling *owers, spray ponds or other man-made heat sinks since the station was a once-through cooled design off - the reservoir.

Plant Life - Peach Botton. Unit 1 operated for seven years. The short life reduced the' degree of contamination that might have developed over an extended operating period.

3.0 CURRENT STATUS The reactor containment and spent fuel area are inside a locked exclusion -area.

. Access to this area is strictly controlled..All other-areas of the station are completely accessible. The technical support center and emergency planning offices for Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 are located in the Peach Bottom Unit l' office area.

Post operation in 1974, a number of work packages were performed that placed the station in its current entombed status.

These work packages accomplished the

!ollowing:

(

o.

All flammable, potentially radioactive. gaseous and liquid was te, and refrigerants were removed, with the exceptien of graphite in the reactor

core, o

Fuel racks were removed.

Page 2 NLJS CCppOWON

f,y w Ai 9,;

y m

k I

q"E i

-; n j

1 b

'o ;

Fission product delay beds and associated filters were removed.

~

m y

o.

lliquid waste = system"was removed with the exception of some embedded

' plpe'.

- (

4

{

.o:

, Spent fuel pool cooling system was removed. Some contamination exists-(

7

-behind' liner in one location.,

1 a

s.

of Exclusion' area barriers were' installed. Equipment was deactivated.. locked f,

g g or welded in place..

[ 4, p.

i

The costfof Implementing!these. changes was $2,980,000... Since entombment,' waste -

~

burial costs have increased by a f actor of 20.. Thus, the early b1 " of major radwaste -

[ items has significantly-reduced the overall decommissioning cost.

7 4.0 '

' BASIS OF ESTIMATE :

1' E

L

, tQuantities of materials and; equipment to be removed from Peach Bottom.Unitil were -

• estimated from a review of documents generated for the.Initlal entombment activi c

uyk-3

' ties, station general arrangement. drawings, and site walk down. Cost factors used forH 1 Peach Bottom Units 12 and 3,(see Table 5-1) were applied-to these quantities.

j.

a f

k LAiseparate decommissioning activity not connected to the decomrnissioning of: Units 2' '

andL 3i was assumed. : : The activity was assumed to.~take bplace 'in a. 3-year period --

utilizing utility and staff and outside services developed forllts specific needs without 1

3 t regard to similar activities at other stations.

I n

c g

. 5.0t

- DECOMMISSIONING COSTS i

Decommissioning costs for Peach Bottom Unit 1 are summarized in the following two j

?

g g

. tables. Table E-1 presents the total cost of decommissioning.. Table E-2 presents the-nuclear-related cost. Table E-3 provides a distribution by cost escalation category.

f l Escalation of cost is discussed in the summary report, Section 4.4.

L i

blt :

NUS CORPCMCN s

...il.

.c -

^

./#.. - -

a-

~

TABLE E-1.

. Decommissioning Cost Summary for -

- Peach Bottom.htomic Power Station, Unit I (in thousands of March 19gts dollars):

Total Cost -

9

=

FEllC Account / flame itemoval Cost Disposal Cost '

Salvage Gain

~ Total Cost 321 Structures and improvements

$ 2,68's

$55 (117) 3,122--

322 Ileactor Equipment 1,052

2,668.

_ (13) '

~3,707; 323 Turi >ogenerator 669 l 's (ta l) 6's 2 32's Accessory Electrical 226 2

(12) 216 y

52's Miscellaneous Nuclear Expense 900 900 920 Utility A&G 3, 's 2's 8, '# 2 's 923 Outside Services 2,010 2,010 92's Insurance 50 30-TOTAL

$ 16,015 3,2'40 (133)

$ 19,072 z

C (0

00 D

110 D

t U

Z in.

,x wsW{ggyft7-' M9f]g 3 g y 1 7 ~/ W % ?:] { f 9 41 Q y { y y g ]~~

y

.m x-n 2:

m-

.y

.m m,

e

~

.,we

y. m " O.".E -

's.- [.1-

-,,. y,;. ~.. n~:'"".,..n.',,,,,'

z

...x

~ + "'.,

,. w...

w. -

..^~~.y~

.. i

_3 r

KC:'C"!.7'

'(.O-n g.y m

?=

...r-

- 7j,. -

... 9

,-},'*~', ;._. ; b -.,, M. a y, J,7. -

..C -E h e

- C '.

^

"U.

l {,.

..( 9. 6..? :k

.g~...

'v 2

~

m3. 3,

~~ T '

W~

~ 'i N --

"- ? & E"(;;jN

[W Wh c r. ~ -

._a~

-g H"^C CC-E-Z g4

-gg. 4.g.gg g g ( W jdT 1 "'n"'7-@ ' -

g ;-

j e: jj p

=.-

~~ %,

w

~

4.y 7y 3.q;

-3

~

+

~ Decommissioning _ Cost Summary Ior" xM9 jeacij[ Bottom Aiomic Power Station Unit I

. [.

a-.

= : '

~

n gs f (in timusands of March'1984 dollars)

~

~

=

.z..

' Nuclear-Related Cost

~

(

~~

la

_^ _ _

_ u, -=

'N '

^$

FEllC Account / Nam ~e

~

illemoval Cost L _

" Disposal Cos't Salvage Gain' Totaltosi

..v 321-Structures and Improvements l$~1,626:

430?

~

' ( 83) '

$' 1,%3 !

~

322 Iteactor Equipment '

? I,032...

'2,668i

~

(13) 3,707.-

f 323 Torbogenerator

'0 0

,0 324 Accessory Electrical-0:

-0 01 524 Miscellaneous Nuclear Expense 1900 u

900:

920 Utility A&G >

13,616?

ED 3,616 B:-

923 Outside ' Scrvices

't,346

.lj40i o,

--. y 924 Insurance K50

-30; q

TOTAL

$ 10,584

~~$: 3,098-

- (10tf E$ 13,58:

m

~.

4-ig h

.. +

' +;e 2

2.j..

w Z

C in 0

m O

i D

l.

n O

e..

' 31 L

Z r-.

'E. Ai

' _ ~ '. f. 4:

...~

h g

2

.~

t N',A SNm -r v l^ r'A' n ~ r ~5 re we - ~

O, vm-m==

YEA w d w-- rm a-

~ "'

~-~"^'--w'1~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ' - *

~"N A* ' - - " ' '

C.....

.+

a..,

n ~l~,-- &.,,.p l

.-..wlJ.h -

.e~~:F D A l-cNr:b.

,NA~&' N-

m:

r

'i a **

4, TABLE E-3 DECOMMISSIONING COST

. BY COST ESCALATION CATEGORY

'(by thousands of March 1984 dollars) 1 Peach Bottom Unit i Nuclear Related Cost Catecorv Totel Cost Cost l

Craf t Labor, Skilled 3,068 1,337 Craf t Labor, Comrnon 1,374 gg9 Professional / Technical Labor.

9,884 6,849 Equipment i,339 gg4 Low Level Waste Burial 1,843 1,gqg d~

Salvage If n-(103)

(101) l Copper (80)

(0)

Energy and Other 1,742 1,065 TOTAL.

g9,072 13,331 L

-[.w 1

e h

j Page 6 N

Nus CC APC AATION M

{*SP O W

j

.., j

~

g 3

4

\\

7

( f.c i;

!p

g gi-r-

x e

-in I

t e

p, +.

9 f

l y

j

.l'..

Maler Assumptions

(;,

Tj The majorissumptions used to develop' this decommissioning cost estimate aret

[

u p

m-

[.l1 oi Decommissioning is to reflect immediate dismantlement following removal of a!!

a T

.' spent fuel from the site,-

1 w

o

- Demoli, tion. Is (to be : performed to a depth of! three' feet.below ' grade.

All l"

t o

k.

radioactive material below this' depth would be removed.

p-D -.

^

"1.arge yard buried pipe (36-inches and!!arger) would be collapsed and backfilled.:,

[

o

[F

• f

.c I!,

Small yard pipe and conduit would be abandoned in place.

(

.r ip

o

- Areas!of the site clal'med from the Conowingc vervoir would be returned to' the reservoir.

q

+

it:

'o ~. : Nonradioactive debris would be disposed of at an on-site landfill.

ci:

. Radioactive wasterwould be disposed of at the Barnwell low-level radwaste u

s Mo

, s ;,

m-

.g N[l i dtsposal facility.

%[L

<oV.tThe N555 would be decontaminated.

.I,

.G i

~.

o 11.arge N555 components' would ce sectioned to fr.cilitate removal, packaging and-k~

l transportation, i/ U I -

3-2 NUS CCAPC AAWC

7. -

q' 2, -.t>-

L

}

,p 8

'y T

...,g

31-}< %my y - em;s o m,1

a. c {._.

m e -

i

='p

- m y

v-.

y.

3

.. i,

=

+

^s rj

e a-put s

.. f. y'

.4 4 il S

!4

.t i %

i

! u f ' fp * [;W

,[j ? s{ r' L j )f.

- ; 1[, ;i([

g e M(;'[',.

S @;/);;

i' d

. ~ ',

E,;{, l p q.'

J f

i t,

'qgW.

'=

lAct.gy.

jg i -,

c t.

X

. n.

Mw y m

.$v --p

>r i,a

,E 1l. -

Cf..

.M v irM.

e

' ';{'

=. 4 -

s 1g u-4 dlq.,.4z'd h'%;

% pn

-};.

'A:

)

ph

+

' s.h.Y' 5 d.I d -.

"N

,'i $ '

~ k) a.w n,f '

,4im[.

4'

,4, A,

. yn pj-_

=

-)

, f -

, w

.x n.

. v.,

u.

.L u To1 !$wtructuralldemol.ition.fof i a ' given !!acility iobid ' not b.e performed untilf all Jt 4

5<

,, 'i,,,

s

[

• ' # k' D1. p O!;T't. x g', r,a,dioactiv. e < materials"h' a've been removed from the Jacility.

g

+

1 u.

03,

.e

~,t

,a p,%, s. ".

. > r >

=v' et

.t

- =

1..__

4-9-tj 1; -. e

' JThe site wou'ld bejrestored to a natural condition, that is graded andlandscaped.?

-c.

n e: :J, f:i s,

' ', +

jy

- +

' I..

Q.f.

i s.! ;. m. c! 4.,,,.. -.;

1-

!.. (

_,..g

-)

'}

'[V D: r

M.Mp,c 4o^ < hTh'efutilhy.will provide oversight.o!J the decommissioning eliort, with' a prime g-

, r m.

idecommissioning contractor; managing _the project.

s g :y n# -.3-..

._ j._4

.g3

i a

. h t

s

'*_.,, g y,f..2 - tj r

_J g

1.j.,t,h i,

~n, t

4 ef l (f -

t

' r p"y:Q _

a l3. ' 4 VM bU..

i' _

i t

' h.

l.

YJV l!^

'a.

'ta ju '

f!-

bN i t-t 2

}NL w

.. I )." "

76 w

• J l g '3 );,, --,,,. 4 f'

'i j1

'.: j t

.;J--

hi.

(d { I.

@ ('ji; t(K(

nf; n.-

-a'.

! r

,) !,

4

, ; L ' '.,

t t

g 6

ll}p m p

r

. g..

i MF.,:('

m.g,. o o

'Ml

.: c'

.7 i.

s an

'l ff I

_f'j i-6 f

'1 I' h I

Lj v.;

t i '

$i-

+

i o

J,,4 '

i l

?f o, p r

(

s

,-)

p-k'.

, s s

-J:;f s

y.

5.-.a._

,-=

se s t j.13,.'F#

a; e m,Q-

. y' i t'

5 f,4 f.

l b;

1 p

e t

d G*4 ! s 3,

!(

i h;!f,

.c4 V

'- ]f + 't:. 2..

8 lq},b" Q

): AN

'I-.,:

t,,

i.. _.

s y

't 5

I' k i 5.' 5..,

,,,g.

y-

?

' i I

1 s

i p-y 2=

w.

.y

)

tj>

j $ ".r s '

I g

(t ; +

y>

3 i

i p, -..

f?

Q]h0l,

Qf; I,h?

.Il tn-7

VN.

rf,,

j'ill

.f. l

$-Y I-g4

,, kg

.a4 7

y iYN

.lG E.;'

ys m

d..

Mi id.

d-J /

_;c

.%.p.,

%n A.

ce

\\.

{ 8 '?

n N '.

[qfjfiiw N'

+

[tjl.E I b.

8,'

{

jp

,t viw 4

.s

-e l.

y mg we t; s fsg

'e i&;; j %

s

+.

p.>

,e

^'

g 1

i.?l ',

hY d

. 9 b, T. 2 Ms 5

{j l

gg 3-3 '

NUS CC ApCAATCN y

m W

. n g- - Of

.tv w:

a',Q..4

?!

.L 4

l 4'@

M L.f :o, m

,N N4 a.y.'

_o; > ?;;.g :

s.

x-i.

s y

g, yk) h$

t TABLE'5 PEACM BOTTOM n

i< <

-r e

[_. c' t

- NUS CORPOPJ. TION f

.PHILADELPHI A ELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING STUDY F

o' DISPOSAL OOST CODES l

[

DESCRIPTION VALUE UNITS' 3

CODE.

42.00-

$/ TON L 'l601' HAUL AND DISPOSE OF STRUCTURAL / MISCELLANEOUS STEEL AT ONSITE LANDFILL n

D02 ~ LOAD ON TRUCKS, HAUL AND DISPOSE OF CONCRETE 18.00 S/CY M

RUBBLE AT ON SITE LANDFILL I?

.D03. DISPOSE OF. CONCRETE RUBBLE IN SUBSTRUCTURE 9.00 S/CY i

AREA OF BUILDING FROM ' WHICH IT WAS REMOVED

.4.

' D04 ' HAUL' WITH FRONT END LOADERS AND DISPOSE OF 15.50

$/CY

-i p

J CONCRETE ' RUBBLE IN SUBSTRUCTURE AREA OF

[E

. BUILDING OTHER THAN THAT - FROM WHICH IT WAS b

RFJ40VED i

+

k

DOSL LOAD, HAUL AND DISPOSE OF-LIGHT BUILDING 15.00 S/CY

['

1 RUBBLE-TO ~ ON-SITE : LANDFILL (MAX. 1 MILE MAUL)

' D06L LOAD ON TRUCKS, ' HAUL-AND. DISPOSE OF CONCRETE 24.00

$/CY h

1 RUBBLE FROM TURBINE BUILDING / REACTOR / CON-TAINMENT AT ON-SITE LANDFILL - (MAX. 1 MILE

[

p.>>

HAUL)f 00.55

$/L.F.

i

[ [Dil DISPOSE OP. CHAIN LINK FENCE i.

F ' D 12 LOAD :ON TRUCKS AND DISPOSE OF SUBAQUEOUS 36.00

$/CY RUBBLE TO ON-SITE LANDFILL

.l 1

D40. DIESEL GEN. SET, SWIYCHGEAR MCC, TRANSFORMER 14.00 S/ TON-

. GENERATOR CONTROL & INST. CABLE, BUS DUCT '

-l

.i 70.00 S/ TON j

'D41 SKV & 480V POWER CABLE D50 PACKAGE, SHIP AND BURY CONTAMINATED 640.00-S/ TON' STRUCTU RAL/MISCELLANT.0US STEEL

{

r 51 PACKAGE, SHIP AND BURY CONTAMINATED CONCRETE 92.00 S/CF 1j SCABBLED FROM-WALLS AND FLOORS

<D52 PACKAGE, SHIP AND - BURY ACTIVATED CONCRETE 189.00.

S/CF D60- DISPOSAL OF CONTAMINATED CABLE 1000.00:

S/ TON

,D61 DISPOSAL OF. CONTAMINATED CONDUIT 676.00 S/ TON i

r

• 'D62 DISPOSAL OF CONTAMINATED CABLE TRAY 1440.00 S/ TON' ALUMINUM l

S-9 a /<

4 i

%?

)

>)'

_X

~

~

~

l

'O

((j ;ii %

>+,

TABLE 9-14 PEACH BOTTOM f jim,

x

..i

NOS~- CORPORATION -

~if.

-PHILADELPHI A ELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING STUDY E

DISPOSAL COST CODES y'-

VALUE' UNITS a

. DESCRIP' TION CODEc

~

540.00:

S/ TON

( :D63' DISPOSAL 4 0F CONTAMINATED CABLE GALV. STEEL

.20 S/SF-W31 IDISPOSAL; OF CLEAN l INSULATION.

y 322.00 S/ TON i W53': [DISPOShD 4OF' CONTAMINATED. PIPE '

-j TW54

DISPOSAb OF SHREDDABLE CONTAMINATED STEEL

_580'.00 S/ TON r

' ~~

iCOMPONENTS t

W55' DISPOSAL OF SMALL ST?iL COMPONENTS (HON-

~1100.00 S/ TON 3

i

>(

(

' ( VOLUME ; REDUCTABLE)

. n

'1500.00

$/ TON

.W56 i DISPOS AL OF NON-BULRY. CONTAMINATED STEEL iX; COMPONENTS

+

i (HIGH VOLUME TO. WEIGHT

=3900.00-S/ TON-b,'aW57~'DISPOSALOFBULKY.a.] RATIO)l CONTAMINATED STEEL COM 4

I585.0'0 S/ TON h,.

W60L DISPOSALiOriSHREDDED-CONDENSER TUBES 76.50L

!$/ CELL

[.'

W66/ lDISPOSALj OF BWR SPENT 3 FUEL STORAGE RACKS g

34.00' S/Ch a

b

W71! DISPOSAL;OF DAW 1 136.00

$/CF

~ W72? : DISPOSALi OF WR SOLIDIFIED RESINS 35500.00

-S/UN'.?

W731 DIFPOSAL OFiWASTE GENERATED WHEN

'DECONNING A BWR NSSS l,

5132.00-S/ TON,

L KW80 EDISPOS AL - OF BWR' REACTOR' VESSEL 2477.00 S / TON-W I%

(W82T.' DISPOS AL OF BWR!NSSS RECIRC. PUMPS 898.00 h4:,

iW86) TDISPOS AL OF ' BWR NSSS RECIRC PIPING,. VALVES -

1209.00

$/ TON Mi W90 DISPOS AL OF A: BWR HP TURBINE-1700.00 S/ TON:

W921JDISPOSAL OF HIGH WEIGHT &-HIGH VOLUME-h h

CONTAMINATED EQUIPMENT 1353.00

$/ TON-m

[@,

W93 - ' DISPOS AL s OF BWR LP TURBINE 3.97 S/SF-DISPOSAL OF CONTAMINATED INSULATION

W95 626.00 S/ TON-W99j DISPOSAL OF BWR-MAIN STEAM-PIPING 3.75 S/SY YO3i. DISPOSAL OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT IN 1

NN-SITE LANDFILL 6.00 S/SY g

a

YOB.O DISPOS AL' OF CONCPITE PAVEMENT IN LANDFILL 4

5-10' Ir U,

w,.

cg

s +<

p, n

u a ;,

Sy

% 3:11p',

n of e

y TABLE 15-1

' PEACM B3TTOM-

.NUS-CORPORATION '

UDY

. PHILADELPHIA. ELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING ST o.

f' REMOVAL! COST CODES

~.

'm VALUE"

~ UNITS:

DCSCRIPTION CODE;

~43.75

$/MERS UTIL$TY - PROFESSIONAL - LABOR JAl' 50.00

-$/MHRS

^AE PROFESSIONAL; LABOR:

,A2' 24 00

$/MHRS w

SECURITY SERVICES - LABOR

' A3 '

41.70:

$/MHRS HEALTH - PHYSICS SERVICES LABOR -

O.1975

$/CF

/A42 BUILDING: TO 30,000 CF VOLUME

,s501:

0.1714: S/CF-S 1B02 'BUILDINGSCBETWEEN 30,000 CF AND 100,000

- CF VOLUME:

0,1319

$/CF

503 ! BUILDINGS = OVER 100,000 CF VOLUME 47.50

$/CY col : SLAB-ON GRADE WITH LIGHT POUNDATIONS

.t i

EXISTING FLOORS: PRIORM BACKFILLING

LIGHT SU PERSTRUCTU RE

W ALLS / PARTITION S

^

39.50

$/ CY PRECAST PANELS, STEELi ROOF DECKS, MISC -

CO2' ELLANOUS LIGHT. CONSTRUCTION 59.25)

S/CY COOlbNG'TOWERBASINBASESLABELEVATED CO3 m SUPPORTEO FLOORS 66.20

.$/CY e

SLAB'-ON PILESi EQUIPMF.NT FOUNDATIONS

-(OVER 3CY), MEDIUM CONCRETE SUBSTRUCTURE 1C05:

AND SUPERSTRUCTURE. WALLS 81.40

$/CY IC07' MEDIUM CONCRETEt SUBSTRUCTURE AND SUPER-STRUCTURE' FLOORS 138.25

$/CY-

! COB HEAVYi CONCRETE WALLS 173.00

$/CY C09-HEAVY CONCRETE' FLOORS:

233.40

$/CY r

C10 ~.VERY HEAVY CONCRETE WALLS L-'.

291.90

$/CY

!(

Cll r -VERY HEAVY CONCRETE FLOORS

~

47,50

$/L.F.

C12* ' DRILL' DRAIN HOLES: IN EXISTING SASEMAT PREPARATORY TO BACK!'ILLING AREA.

64.40 S/CY L,,

C20 z CONCRETE' SUBSTRUCTURE / RETAINING WALLS

' EQUIPMENT i FOUND ATICMS T

I 5 11 1

4 g

i

l m

y -

r.

j TABLE 5-1 PEACH BOTTOM i

1.

NUS CORPOPATION i

f-PHIlADELPHI A ELECTRIC ' DECOMMISSIONI)'G STUDY i

REMOVAL; COST CODES' i

VALUE UNITS

. DESCRIPTION

" CODE 80.60' S/CY-p C21 CONCPITE' SUBSTRUCTURE MATS / FLOORS e

145.00 S/CY p

HEAVY CONCRETE SUBSTRUCTURE AND SUPER-l

(

C23

{'

STRUCTURE WALLS

'l 181.30 S/CY HEAVY CONCPITE. SUBSTRUCTURE AND SUPER-STRUCTURE FLOORS, T.G.

PEDESTALS C24 199.50 S/CY L

k REACTOR CONTAINMC4T WALLS IN NON-RADIO-C25 l

ACTIVE C4VIRONMENT m

p' 249.25

.S/CY REACTOR CONTAINMENT FLOORS IN NON-l

[.

C26 RADIOACTIVE ENVIRONMutT 30.00

$/CY i

C27I IDEMOLITION AND SECONDARY BREAKING J

' OF' COOLING TOWER SHELLS y:

l

[

79 00 S/CY C30 - DEMOLITION AND SECONDARY BREAKING OF a

k

~ PEACH' BOTTOM' OFF-GAS: STACK 197.50 S/CY jl

, - 1

' C31. SUBAQUEOUS PIER / WALL / MAT DEMOLITION m

39.50

- S/ CY f,

. C32; COLLAPSE AND FILL PEACH BOTTOM OUTLET 4,

i STRUCTU RE 359.50 S/CY L!

REMOVE NONCONTAMINATED CONCRETE IN 3.

f CSO l RADIOACTIVE ENVIRONMENT 41'00, 5/CF

[-

REMOVE CONTAMINATED CONCPITE IN C51-RADICACTIVE ENVIRONMENT 29.65 S/CF DECONTAMINATE CONCRETE FLOOR AND WALL b

C52 IL SURFACES TO 1 INCH DEPTH 1575000.00

$/ STATION E04 ' NON-NUCLEAR - PILATED ENERGY COST iN (PEACH BOTTOM) 2925000.00 S/ STATION E05 ' NUCLEAR FIL..TED ENERGY COST PEACH BOTTOM l

169.50 f/ TON STRUCTURAL STEEL-REACTOR / CONTAINMENT i

154.10 J/ TON j

t.

F01 STRUCTURAL STEEL-TURBINE / RADWASTE BLDGS.

k 1

F02.

128.40 3/ TON q

F03 - STRUCTURAL STEEL-ALL OTHER BLDGS.

i 325.50 5/ TON MISC. -STEEL-REACTOR / CONTAINMENT

'F04-5-12 o' 7

'f '

.t,

q. [ "

^ 3' x

l a

n TABLE 5-1.

PEACH BOTTOM-h' i C MW NUS CORPORATION Y

-PHILADELPHI A ELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING STUD h,S REMOVAL COST CODES j

l VAL E UNITS a

,,6 DESCRIPTION l

2i

CODE '

295.90

$/ TON i

b e F05; MISC.. STEEL-TURBINE /RADWASTE BLDGS.

y.; ;

246.50

'S/ TON

f4 _ F06 ' MISC. STEEL-ALL OTHER BLDGS.

399.00 S/ TON PILING BARRIER WALL 9

'~F07 REMOVE' SHEET PEACH BOTTOM s

l 5 3 0.10 '

$/ TON dh

-F08 ' PULL' SHEET PILING 232.50

$/ TON.

' ' F50 ' DECONTAMINATE STRUCTURAL STEEL p,

P 697.50-

$/ TON F51 - DECONTAMINATE MISCELLANOUS STEEL 313.60

$/ Tor.

' REMOVE.IN : RADIOACTIVE ENVIROMC4T 7

LF52'. STRUCTURAL' STEEL AND LOAD ON TRUCKS -

t(,

602.00 S/ TON F53 - REMOVEL IN RADIOACTIVE DIVIRONMENTMISC

(

995.00.

$/ TON REMOVE STAINLESS STEEL - PLATE LINERS AND

F54-LOAD ON TRUCKS @l2#/SF l

610.00-S/ TON

F55 - REMOVE CARBON STEEL PLATE LINERS. AND LOAD 0

ON TRUCKS : @l7 #/ SF

..W 182.35 S/ TON DECONTAMINATE ' CARBON STEEL PLATE LINERS :

L.N F56 258.35-

$/ TON-NATE STAINLESS STEEL PLATE LINERS F57L DECONTAMI 206.00-

$/ TON-CUT INTO 20 FT.

N TRENCH, REMOVE OFF-GAS PIPE,TO DECONTAMINATION = AREA

- F58

' LENGTHS, TRANSPORT

?

, AND ; BACKFILL ' TRENCH AT - PEACH BOTTOM 232.00

$/ TON DECONTAMINATE OFF-GAS ' PIPE AT PEACH BOTTOM -

h

[F59 23.00 S/ L.F.

M02 1 COLLAPSE AND FILL UNDERGROUND 36" PIPE.

45.75 S/ L.F.

PIPE s.

COLLAPSE AND FILL UNDERGROUND 84" p

M03 68.50 S/ L.F.,

q

~

96" COLLAPSE AND FILL UNDERGROUND 108" ' &

f

&lII[

COLLAPSE AND FILL. UNDERGROUND 120" M04 86.00

$/ L'.F.

PIPE M05 '

1.15 S/CF P

COLLAPSE AND FILL UNDERGROUND VAULTS, U

' MO6~

N LTANKS, ETC...

5-13

yh, x

N

+

m,..n*

['

'A.

O gw',

PEACH BOTTOM.

TABLE'5 o 4

L NUS COP.PORATION.

UDY

(

PHILADELPHIALELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING ST u

I REMOVAL COST CODES U

VALUE

' UNITS e

'i DESCRIPTION

~

E 1350.00' S/EACH~

y s

.C y

M07. PLUG END,OF 78" PIPE 1675.~00 S/EACH.

3 PLUG END OF B4". PIPE 2130.00

$/EACH I

YMOB PLUG END,OF 96" PIPE IPE 94.50i S/CY e;M10 M11-GROUT 1 INJECTION TO FILL VOIDS IN BURIED P 7

208.13 S/ TON

-l CLEAN EQUIPMENT LOCATFD IN-NON-CONTAMINA ZONES WITH REASONABLE ACCESSIBILITY r

JR01 312.19 S/ TON V ' R02 " CLEAN. EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN RADI A rj 468.28 S/ TON

-ZONE - AREAS -

IN RADIATION CONTROL 4

- R03 - CLEAN EQUIPMENT ; LOCATED-ZONES WITH DIFFICULT A OVAL

&m CONSIDERATION:

421.45 S/ TON y

M l

MOVAL

,f R20. CLEAN ' LARGE PIPE RE

-363.66' S/ TON-E CLEAN SMALL' BORE PIPE PIMOVAL

(

1.10

$/SO.FT.

R21 i R22 : REMOVAL OF' CLEAN INSULATION 2'.25

$/HP i

.i

-R23. MOTOR REMOVAL FROM CLEAN AREA 400i00 S/ TON ATOR j

w

'R40; TRANSFORMER,: GENER 1201,00-S/ TON-o g

jl

.. R 411 CONDUIT, TRAY -

2880.00 S/ TON v

-R42 ' CABLE 1491.00 S/ TON t

k

. SWITCHGEAR, MCC, BUSDUCT

)

R43-1991.00 S/ TON u

4; >

b

'R44 UNIT-SUBSTATION 4320.00--

-$/ TON e

t qp ih

- R50. CONTAMINATED CABLE: SKV 1801.00

$/ TON a

R51 CONTAMINATED CONDUIT, TRAY 1553.00

$/ TON-

.R52' ' CONTAMIN ATED CABLE 4 80 KV 7172.00 S/ TON g

Y l

- CONTAMIN ATED ALUMINATED CABLE TRA 3177.00

-$/ TON R53

!lg E TRAY RS4 /. CONTAMINATED GALV. STEEL CABL i

4.

f 5-14 3

y 3

u

_ j I

h v ;h6 hk 4T E

' ic y ;

+z e

s J

2

'/

y, r

%, ;kg 8

$N 4'

ff; Ma f

a X

-l J ;

I

.1)

TXBLE 5-1

. PEACH 40TTOM

~

W.

LNUS! CORPORATION-O',,

PHILADELPHIA 1 ELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING. STUDY:

4

't L y'

. REMOVAL COST CODES N

W

.i

.h 5 S'

p s cn DESC RIPTION.

VALUE-

UNITS d

n CODE 1=

~

f4 i m 2107;70*

$/ TON J

' 2 R61 - LCONTAMINATED i COMPONENT REQUIRING SPECI AL '

L

'l' PACKAGING' BUTE REASONABLY ACCESSIBLE 1475.09

$/ TON l

~

%" ' SR65[ : TURBINE l AND CONDENSER SHELL LREMOVAL (BWR) i 4 (R66: I CONDENSER TUBE' REMOVAL (BWR) 1981.97 5/ TON.,

1 ii q

b 624,38~

$/ TON 4 i

R71. CONTAMINATED COMPONENT LOCATED IN THE

,j

%N

CONTROL ZONE AREA

.s.

--[R72[ CONTAMINATED COMPONENT 14CATED IN CONTROLE 936.56?

$/ TON ~

~

l 4

, W ZONE WITH. DIFFICULT ACCESS OR REMOVAL j

! CONSIDERATION j

+

fR73 (CONTAMINATED COMPONENT REQUIRING.SPECIALL:1407)38

$/ TON o."

~T M

. PACKAGING AND, LOCATED IN A DIFFICULT

' /d uP

. ACCESS AREA-l-

hi

/ ' !R7 4' '..CONTAMIN ATED - COMPONENT PIOUIRING. S PECI AL936.56.'

$/ TON:

..

j; yh. R81, { CONTAMINATED L SMALL BORE PIPE REMOVAL 727.31,

.$/ TON =

Rg 2.194=

$/ TON' i!

" RS2 L ; REMOVALD OF.. CONTAMINATED INSULATION a

w 3. 3, 7 : $/ HP

,d b >R831 LMOTOR.iREMOVAL FROM CONTAMINATED AREA <

1264.f S/ TON' j

m-

[RBM ' EXTRA) HEAVY LARGE, PIPE : REMOVAL y

253,13:

. S/ CELLE i

' RS6; :. REMOVALL OF ~ MJEL - RACK

- o a

-1500000.00

. $/ STATION:

'l p.

?,

A011 LREMOTE OPERATING: CUTTING TOOL i

350000.00 S/ ST ATION '

1 37020 PORTABLE HVAC. SYSTEM 4

500000.00' S/ STATION :

l 70'3$ i SPECIAL'. LIFTING TOOLS 125000.00 S/ STATION PORTABLE CUTTING TOOLS

- l ' )T O'4 t

a k

2000000.00 S/ UNIT 1

f l

M.X017,BWRI NSSS DECON. COST

^a b

YO2$ BWR$ HEALTH' PHYSICS SUPPLIES 620000.00

$/ STATION iy q

g;

- 4

.1 m

7 Y.

be q

o m

,y

. 3 t

W,, ; ;

-p

~-

4'

-r p3p y e.iI Y

a,,

4 m

M' q.

s:

,n.

1,,

hW c,.

%y:;'Q' TABLE 5-1 PEACH BOTTOM I

NUS CORPORATION

@._ ", PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING STUDY y% 4 REMOVAL ~ COST CODES L.. H >. -

pj u-OCODEt DESCRIPTION VALU E '

' UNITS

%f

,XO3 ? nCONTRACT SOLIDIFICATION SERVICE '

408000.00 S/ STATION o>

1 c:

,w

[X21 PEACH BOTTOM ' LI ABILITY INSURANCE 1400000.00 S/ STATION t

ylg r. ;;;

L: X30iHEALTHf PHYSICS TRAINING COST 980100

$/MHRS I

1 jY01icDEMOLITION OF' BITUMINOUS PAVEEENT AREAS l'. 4 0 -

S/. SY.

1 g

W; ;YO2h REMOVAL-OF RAILROAD', INCLUDING TRACK, TIES 17.25

' S/ L.F.

1

, # ' BALLAST v

?

' YOS A. DEMOLITION OF-CONCRETE - PAVEMENT AREAS 16.00 S/SY j

p cik.

o GYO7 (REMOVAL OF CHAIN LINK FENCE'

4.00

'S/L.F.

1 w 7.

.i.

RYO9L ' REMOVAL' OF DIKES, ABOVE WATER LEVEL, TRUCK S'.05

$/CY-

'0

'AND,. SPREAD

,q.

r, D

siY10, REMOVAL' OF DIKES BELOW WATERi LEVEL, TRUCK AND ~

7.00 S/CY.

l S S PR EAD --

]

pm I

1 11: (REMOVAL OF DPIDGED FILL ~ ABOVE WATER - LEVEL,

4'.50

$/CY

{

fTRUCK'AND SPREAD-u ^,

)Y121 _ REMOVAL" OF. DREDGED FILL BELOW WATER LEVEL, 6'.40

$/CY Q,, TRUCK lAND: SPREAD L

fTl4L PEACH BOTTOM 1 YARD GRADING AND LANDSCAPING.

6900.00

$/ AC RE '

e NY16 ESTABLI SH, MAINTAIN AND CLOSE ON-SITE 128500.00

. S/ AC RE LANDFILL i$.v. '

kn

. c,.

i s

L -id, n v

49-'

,t;

[j-1 t

h;

$=I6 ll

.k s..

k

'y

gg-os, p-p7

,=c e

y,

,;oi j1 a

N$f!;,

, t-j' l.

O';

' TABLE Sil-PEACH BOTTOM t

o I

NUS CORPORATION l PHILADELPHIA l ELECTRIC DECOMMISSIONING STUDY SALVAGE VALUE CODES -

. o i

1 l.

DESCRIPTION

- VALUE UNITS o.

4 h7. CODE-49.00

$/ TON

[501s LSALVAGE STRUCTURAL' STEEL

-40.00' S/ TON L.4 f 9502: L SALVAGE MISCELLANEOUS STEEL AND CARBON

!c

. STEEL PLATE

~

F __

380.00

(/ TON?

hit 5031 SALVAGE. STAINLESS -STEEL PLATE g

2.23 S/ L'.F.

h($04' SALVAGE OF RAILROAD RAILS, TIES AND BALLAST

w

.2.00~

S/CY

' =S06 SALVAGE OP: OREDGED FILL' 2.00 S/ HP 520 ~ LMOTOR. GREATER TH AN:,1000. HP.

5.00 S/HP S21 MOTOR LESS THAN 1000 HP

'40.17-S/ TON t ]- '

i 5 22 ; : MISC. ' ECUIPMENT L STEEL' g

-1100.00

$/ TON

[NS40 GENERATOR : (COPPER)-

1 1100.00 S/ TON is,

a:E ; S417 TRANSFORMER,. BUSBAR -(COPPER).

u 876.00

$/ TON h' [542I CABLE (COPPER)

S 4 3 l T RAN SF., ' G EN., SWGR.(STEEL)'.

49'.11

$/ TON

.s O

47.32 S/ TON.

FS44 CONDUIT, TRAY._(STEEL)~

TRAY - ( ALUMINUM) 1314.00 S/ TON

!',+25 4 5 ! _ C ABLE, TU BING',

.30 S/ GAL.

7-

• LS46 ' TRANSFOPJ4ER OIL W

-b.,

hN v

n v

l

?

y-s I'

i

,; c 5.1 5 17

t i

4.4 Escalation of Base Year Decommissionine Costs 1

Prior rulings of the Commission have established the sound practice of requiring the I

collection of revenues for decommissioning, based on current decommissioning costs.

In parallel, the purchasing pow r of the funds being accumulated is also maintained at

+

v current levels.

Both of these practices require periodic estimates of then-current decommissioning costs. This is done by escalating each of the components of the base cost by an appropriate inflation index and ebtaining an updated (current) decommis-i tioning cost. The purpose of this section is to identify the specific cost indices to be 1

used and to describe the subdivision of total and nuclear-related decommissioning costs into components that are appropriate for escalation. The cost breakcowns and a I

one-year projection of the indices using past one year actual rr.tes are used to estimate March 1985 decommissioning costs.

4.4.1 Selection of Cost Indices for Escallation The costs in decommissioning are incurret for craft labor, prof essier.at labor,.

equipment and materials, nuclear waste disposal, and a number of "other" costs, including energy, less credits for salvaged equipment anc materials.

The feceral government regularly publishes indices which represent average costs in most of *hese categories, in addition, a number of private organisations cevelop indices of costs for special categories not covered by government publications, in :ne latter category, tr.c i

i L il.

y

1. 9

.r y

j g

i i

+

Pl

)

i I

i lgevernment does not publish appropriate regional cost incices for construction ergj; fabor.

Because the large statistically-oriented McCraw Hill organization, in its h.

l l'

~ Engineering News Record, publishes cost indices for skilled and common construction 4

. labor in the Ph!!adelphia area, these two Indices were selected for craft labor. With the exception of nuclear waste burial, appropriate Department of 1. abor indices have '

. ' been selected for the other cost component., Nuclear waste. burial costs are based on n'"

. the price !!sts for curren; commercial services. Table 4-9 identifies the spe:lfte iL Indices that have been selected and the base values for March 1984, which is the base fl cate for the costs'in this repor*

- I l

i, 4.4.2 Cost Components for Escalation This section summart:es the bases for establishing the costs.in each of the cost I

^

categories that will be used for escalation. The removal a'nd. non-nuclear disposal l

i portions of Account 321, '322,323,324, and 332 include craf t labor and related burdens plus equipment cost. The latter averages 23.9% of the tot;st cost, the remaineer being u

a!!ocated as.craf t labor. Craf t labor costs are judged to, be.3396 common and 6396 l

l 1 - skilled. All of Account 324, except energy, is equipment cost. A!! of Account 920 plus" j

-the A/E, health physics, and corresponding portions of HP tr Ining in Account 923, are

)

.[

professional / technical labor costs, and the remainder are craft labor. The nuclear l

waste -disposal' cost is allocated 3.7% to craf t labor,17.0% to equipment, !!.1%

1

..-(transportation) to energy and other; and 67.3% to burial fees. The salvage credits are m

allocated between the iron; and steel 5: rap, and the copper scrap categories. All remaining costs are included in the energy and other category.

E l

f 4

(-

d

{

k g

l E

t 1,71 s

- 3

-= m :=

e7 -

=~L

= - -

~

.1 ITABLE%-7: '

~

~

[ N$

w Cost Catenorles, Cost Indice6 and. Base Vihees

~'

for Future inflation Adjustments Base Yalue of Index

~- Cost Category '

index March 1984 Crait I. abor. Skilled Engineering News Record. "Consittection

~

333.6-

~.

Wage Indexes" for Philadelphia Area.

4 Cra f t I. abor Common

' Engineering tiews Record,"Constrtiction 420.0

~ =-

wage Indexes" for Philadelphia Area I'rofessional I. abor 11LS, Monthly Labor Review. Table 34

- 122.2

^

" Professional and Technical Workers" Esiidpment DLS, Producer Prices and Price Indexes, 333.8~

. Table 6, Code 112. " Construction Machinery and Equipment" 1.ow.imevel Waste Burial Chem fluclear Barnwell Price List

.3 21.R ElIcctive Janua3y I.1989 ($1%.30/f g Isase. $2.30/ft c: crow,. St.00/f t 5.C. tax. 2.8s% coemty tax)

Salvage:

fron and Steel Scrap HLS, Producer Prices and Price Indexes, 311.1 Table 6 Code 1012," Iron and Stcel Scrap Copper Scrap Code 1023.01 " Copper Base Scrap" 149.6 Energy anel Other 11LS,' Producer Prices and Price Indexes, 309.6 Table I," Materials and Components for Construction" n.

.m, i "

p.,p'

,,,e9,...ey, yh

-v'M**'

9 wp -

.ee

• g9u-'='*dl-

.+'N*+'-pr-T>'3g 4p u.g g y p V yF*1

'MPyet=iJ Net <

e "WT 9' T+g999a

• g8'u9*"WM emit'-Wt'ge><e,w'-

1*

• brummJd+W+N4 3

%mearm a t. sWPrir-m*mr

- Adb = -.

L.huan =w a i - w

.ms.,--

a6r-w.

m

-,mm--aa---

---

'm*a

}

F

,;:n 4

e a:

y: e

'r.

i i

w e

CXHIBIT A-2 j

j

(

i F, m...

)

y g

j t

O 1.,

i J

PEACH BOTTOM UNIT 1

' i 1

NUCLEAR RELATED COST. ESCALATION--1984-1990 r

l

=>

(4) * (5) s P-(4)

(5)"

= (G),

i f

(1)

. (2)

(3)

= o(3) / (2) - March 1904 March =1990

j

[

March 1984 March 1990 1984-1990 Cost Cost:.

j Index

'Index Multiplier (000) 4000)

]

L C7,t '. Cat e gory

CroftLLaborg Skilled 353.G.

405.0 1.37161

$1,857

$2,547' lCrdft' Labor, Comroon 420.0-565.0-1.34524i 5849.,

p s i,' 142 l

.i E'r3fGOs i oria l : Labor 122.2-157.0 1.20470 oSG,849.

l$8,799-Equtpment;

.103.3 117.0

- 1. 1'3 2 6 2 5814

.s922 lL;w LWel; Waste'Durial' 21.57, 36.17 1.67607.

21,s40

-s3,099:

lj

!SOlvage;

?

p LIrorv & Steel ' Scrap

.133.9 160.0 1'.19492

- ( $ 101 ),

-($121)

.CopperLScrap.

110.7-150.0-

'1.'35501 SO

.so l Ercrgp.: and j Ot her 105.4 122.0:

1.15750'

-51,465-

-si,696.

j j

r

[?.

's13,581

$10,084 4

!.Tet olci h

l

.t

?

In

!t C

t:

4 h

r t

f ;,

j_-

y e

cf

+ + -

r

.s t

h

t.-

.j

?

s w.

(

61

,i 4

+

{

,L:

,1

-(

% ma c

.a_

f l

' lo Exn3 BIT B t

to.

a

,>r R$+

l Date

~

t ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR QUALIFIED DECOMMISSIONING FUND First Pennsylvania Bank N. A.

is hereby directed to establish a Qualified Decommissioning Fund in the name of Philadelphia Electric Company, and' to deposit therein and hold.

in escrow such monies as shall-be transmitted 'to it from time to time for this purpose by_ Philadelphia Electric Company.

It

[

is intended that.this Fund shall comply with Section 468 A.of the l

Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to the fullest extent possible.

f Accordingly, this Escrow Agreement may be amended or revoked at

"[

_ any time as may be necessary to perdit Philadelphia Electric Company to. comply with whatever requiremunts may hereaf ter be adopted by the Internal Revenue Service or the Department of i

[

the Treasury.

First Pennsylvania Bank N.A. shall divide the Fund.

)bg g;'into subaccounts, with a,,pgparate subaccount to be created. for.

h %V each nuclearsgenerating fib t which is to be decommissioned in a

the futureLby Philadelphia Electric ' Comp'any.

First Pennsylvania Bank N. A. = shall invest all monies in;the Fund, including income ~

't'i on the investments, and shall otherwise deal _ with the1 Fund as follows:

i

1) Select and invest all funds in (tax free) securities issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, _its political subdivisions,

agencies and authorities, with the limita-t

. tions that the securities purchased should at a minimum be rated Single A with maturi-ties in the 8 to 12 year. range.

l

2) Purchases.should be in securities whose price is near par rather than discounted.

This approach is suggested in order to minimize the amount of capital gains taxes to he paid on appreciation.

'3) Provide. safekeeping for securities in the account.

4) Register securities in nominee name or maintain in bearer form.

5) Collect the principal of all securities as they mature, are redeemed or sold.

6) Make transfers from inec=e to princic al of the fund account for reinve s t:nent.

o!

s" I

~

~'~

l r

7) Maintain a-record of securities' held including i

~

all purchases and sales thereof, and furnish the-t Philadelphia-Electric Company Treasurer or Assis-

'[

tant Treasurer with a monthly - statement of receipts and disbursements of principal and income, and l

annually, a list of securities held in the account including approximate market values.-

l

8) Supply the Treasurer cr. Assistant Treasurer of.

j Philadelphia Electric Company, confirmations of.

~

trades as soon as possible after trade is completed.

9) Collect all interest and other income from the securities held under this agreement.

+

10) Except. for taxes, bank feus and other expenses associated with the operation of the fund account-First Pennsylvania Bank N.A. Will parmit funds-to be paid out of the account only upon presentation by the' Philadelphia Electric Company-to First.

Pennsylvania Bank N. A. - of a certificate. signed by i

its President or.one of its Vice: Presidents and-its; Treasurer or an Assistant Treasurer requesting such payment, r

f Philadelphia Electric Company will indemnify and hold harmless the First Pennsylvania ^ Bank N. A. from and against all liabilities, losses and other= expenses-arising in any way. connected with its; reliance upon the above mentioned certificate,- and:First

' Pennsylvania Bank N.A. shall~have'no duty to verify signatures on such certificate.

First Pennsylvania Bank N.A.'s compensation for this service shall be based upon market values at an annual. rate of:-

$6.50 per $1,000. on the first S1,000,000.

SS 00 per $1,000.- on the next

$5,000,000.

$4.00 per $1,000, on the next

$10,000,000.

S2.50 per $1,000. on the balance.

l taken quarter-annually at the end of each calendar quarter.

to.txt In the' event-any special services are required, First Pennsylvania t

i I

r"TPT a :e;.

-c-

.'ti$y [3 ; -

.i jf'y.aj-y a

f 9;.

4

~

m i

R l' 5,'

I 3

Si. -

]

i

f. ?

I,

-3

> :i o

1,

?

,r-t i _.

/,.i*

^ Bank N. A. 'shall be compensated in -accordance;with a separate 1

. agrevment.

It'is' understood that this Agreement may be-

'l mo'dified by mutual consent, in writing: and ' this arrangement

- may be-terminated by either party by giving written _ notice to l

the other--party.

-a PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY <

]

.r o'

a Nfl 7 blhm t 1W l

(Signature).

1 I p

ic 4 Treasurer (Title);

,q

. 2301 Market-Street 9

(

19101' 1

Philadelphia, Pa.

i

?

-i ACCEPTED:

r i

4 A

FIRST PENNSYLVANIA BANK N.A.

i.

.j

}

l

.By IU'##C S'

" ' "D V tv'Is rcNa u YKt Yrnlc.:vr"'

t l Z.f Sl!Tk-h Date i

~

r r

'?

l t

?

[

CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORITY

)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY I, M. D. Lyons, Assistant Secretary of Philadelphia Electric Company (" Company"), do hereby certify that on June 25, 1990 Corbin A. McNelli, Jr., President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company executed a certain document confirming and ratifying the authority of certain officers of the Company to execute on behalf of the Company documents relating to the establishment of tunds for the decommissioning of the Company's nuclear facilities as follows:

This will confirm and ratify the authority of M. W.

R1 merman as Treasurer of the Company to execute on behalf of the Company a certain Escrow Agrooment for Qualifying Decommissioning Fund dated Docomber 31, 1984 for the Company's nuclear units, the authority of M. W. Rimerman as a Vice President of tho Company to executo on behalf of the Company certain instruments dated March 14, 1988 relating to the establishment of Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds for Peach Bottom Unito 2 and 3, Salem Units 1 and 2, and Limerick Unit 1 and the authority of M. W.

Rimerman as a Vice President of the Company to execute on behalf of the Company for Limerick Unit 2 a similar instrument for such purpose.

/s/

C. A. McNeill, Jr.

President. and Chief Operating Of ficer WITNESS, my hand and the seal of Philadelphia Electric Company S

this26 day of 1990.

))).kYo fpW2 Assistant Secretary Exhibit C

g a

4

,0%. $ 41[]*

Sch::dule. of Paymsnto.

EXHIBIT D' o-

. g,'..

- Peach. Dot t om. Atornic Power Stat ion,. Unit-1 1, u., ;

4

(.e f &-r, p3 N!;;31ccr Related Cost (Exhibit A-2)-

$18,084,000--

,.. =

'C,maining Years for Collection of

Decornr.lissioning Costs 1991 2015 25-

,;S

. 3, t Minimura: Depost t per' Year

'S723,360 / year

. q --

u

PrCp31deBalanew in, External-Funds

~Ct : D cernber J 31, 1989 :

-so Nurnb;r of.Yearsl of-Mt nirnurn Deposit's V!ncluded in Prepaid Balance O.00.

m.

(TCtclil Deposit sj

!!C91L

=2015'at.$723,360/ year

.$18,084,'000' ITctcl.' Deposits Availkble for Decorarnissioning

.$10,084,000 p.%

fih n.v G

h 1

7-q)Pil!

..- j l' 9 3

',)[

I' t

.J l_'

+i w ii t

r Ik k

. {.

p :' c' k;

.4

+

I i

4 g

f N,,

~,

f I

i e

l i

i i

i ATTACHMENT 2 DECOMISS10NING REPORT AND CERTiflCATION Of flNANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR

~42,49% Of PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION,' UN115 ? AND 3 l

l

--