ML20038C988

Final Deficiency Rept 144 Re Possible Installation of Defective 2-inch Schedule Pipe,Initially Reported on 811106. Extensive Testing Indicated That Piping Would Have No Adverse Effect on Plant.Condition Not Reportable

ML20038C988
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	11/25/1981
From:	Matlock R WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, GO2-81-493, NUDOCS 8112140320
Download: ML20038C988 (2)

Text

-

Docket No. 50-397

~ f<y 50 55(e) Rep g t:Rc Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000GeorgeWashingtonWay Richland,Washingtoge 09 72-5000 November 25, 1981 2 G02-81-493 MGlD.LlVg3 Docket No. 50-397 Mr. R. H. Engelken U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[&'f f s

q

~

Region V 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 [p' DEgj 9 gg $;

J Walnut Creek, California 94596  % u.,, TQ* e

Subject:

SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 2 10CFR50.55(e) POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE CONDITION #144 POSSIBLE INSTALLATION OF DEFECTIVE 2" SCHEDULE 80 PIPE

Reference:

1. Letter No. BECWNP2-81-0584, S. Photos to R. Johnson, dated November 17, 1981, To Test and Evaluate Pipe From Heat No. N12475, No. N12477, and No. J710449.

2. Letter No. G02-81-0454, R. Matlock to R. Engelken, dated November 6, 1981, 10CFR50.55(e) Potentially Reportable Condition #144 - Possible Installation of Defective 2" Schedule Pipe.

3. Bestco Liquid Penetrant Report No. 016.

4. Bestco Ultrasonic Thickness Report No. 060.

5. Bestco Liquid Penetrant Report No. 018.

6. Bestco Ultrasonic Thickness Report No. 063.

In accordarce with provisions of 10CFR50.55(e), your staff was informed of the subject condition. After an extensive outlined testing program was performed, the results were conclusive that the pipe passed all tests.

& v I .--

,b i 8112140320 811125- b, p I

PDR ADOCK 05000397 S PDR

~

8} -210l 3

4 Mr. R. H. Engelken November 25, 1981 Page Two G02-81-493 Our evaluation shows that the 2" Schedule 80 pipe would have no adverse effect on safe plant operations. Therefore, this condition is not reportable under the provisions of 10CFR50.55(e). This concludes our final report on the subject condition.

Very truly yours, f c

. . atlock Pr gram Director, WNP-2 RGM/RH/kd cc: W.S. Chin, BPA - Site R.A. Feil, NRC Resident Inspector - WNP-2 A. Forrest, Burns and Roe - HAPO N.D. Lewis, NRC - Olympia J. Plunkett, NUS Corp. - Clearwater, FL R.E. Snaith, Burns and Roe - NY V. Stello, NRC - Washington, DC WNP-2 Files