ML20027A160

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interrogatories Re NRC Position on Technical Merits of Intervenor,Lakeshore Citizens for Safe Energy,Admitted Contentions
ML20027A160
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/02/1978
From: Lafollette B, Walsh P
WISCONSIN, STATE OF
To:
Shared Package
ML20027A161 List:
References
NUDOCS 7810190085
Download: ML20027A160 (3)


Text

~

~

, f;? T 3 W1

%ty -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ag NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gy

,. s i lu - .

In the Matter of ,

W ~

Wisconsin Electric Power Plant S

(Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant, -26& ..-

- ., Docket Nos & 0-3 0 f ****

Units 1 and 2) -

3

OC.T 61973)

INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED TO THE ~w NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p"w w/de STAFF BY THE STATE OF WISCONSIN S

N Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. sec. 2.720 (h) (2) (ii) , the predug officer is requested to order the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff to answer the following interrogatories and serve the s

answers thereto upon Patrick Walsh, Assistant Attorney General, 114 East, State Capitol, Madison, Wisconsin 53702.

INSTRUCTIONS

1. Answer each interrogatory separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection must be stated in lieu of answer.
2. An evasive or incomplete answer is deemed to be a

(

failure to answer under sec. 804.12, Stats.

3. You are under a continuing duty to seasonably supple-ment your response with respect to any questions directly addressed to the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters, and the iden,tity of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at the hearing. Furthermore, you are also under a similar duty to correct any incorrect response when you later learn that it is incorrect.

b(j')Ju lo 1[r/ 0110 085 G '), t v 3 0-9

4. The following terms are defined as follows for the purpose of these interrogatories: .

^

A. Whenever in these interrogatories a request is made ,

to " list," " describe," and " identify" documents, chose terms shall be interpreted as a request to supply as to each document the following information where such information is appropriate for each document.

(1) The type of document (e.g. letter, memoran-dum, report, study, etc.);

~(2) The date of the document; (3) The_date on which the document or copy

)

thereof came to the staff's attention;

(4) The name(s) of the r'.gner (s) of the document, and the author (s) if different from the signer (s);

(5) The-name(s), if any, of the person (s) to whom the document is addressed; i

(6) The present whereabouts of the document or copy thereof and the.name and address of the custodian thereof; (7) Whether the document requested in these interrogatories was in existence or available to the state, but'is no longer available or in exirtence; )

}. (8) Whether the staff; claims that the document

is privileged or otherwise not' subject to discovery; i (9). A brief summary of the subject matter of the document; and [

(10) Whether the staff is willing to produce the -

document.

~

B. As used in these interrogatories, the term " document" is used in a comprehensive sense and includes, without limiting i

-its generality of meaning, all written, typed, printed,Lrecorded, i i

transcribed or. graphic-materials, however, produced, copied or  :

reproduced, of every kind and description..

i

~

2

C. Whenever in these interrogatories a request is made to " list," " state the name of," "name," or " identify" a. person (s), ,

state the name(s), last known address, and the position or relationship of such person (s) to the staff.

D. Whenever in these interrogatories a request is made to state any facts, bases and/or information, in addition to stating the requested facts, bases, and/or information, identify the natural person (s) most knowledgeable as to each such fact, basis and/or information and list all documents which relate to any such fact, basis and/or information.  ;

. INTERROGATORIES ,

e

1. Briefly stal.e the staff's position as 27 the technical merit of each of the intervenor's admitted contentions in this proceeding.
2. For each answer to interrogatory #1 above, please l state the witness and/or witnesses expected to testify at the hearing on behalf of the staff regarding the staff's position. l
3. For each answer to interrogatory #1 above, please ,

t state the technical report and/or reports or other documents relied upon by-the staff in formulating its position. r BRONSON C. LA FOLLETTE l Attorney General

. i i

PATRICK WALSH Assistant Attot.2y General 114 East, State Capitol  :

Madison, Wisconsin 53702 ,

(608) 266-7344 r i

i

?

r

, e- ,,- - ,, v -+ -r---- -

2 v