ML20009B024

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interim Deficiency Rept Re Design Verification of Seismic Category I,Quality Class I Heating,Ventilation & Air Conditioning Sys Hangers,Originally Reported on 801215. Determined Condition Not Reportable Per 10CFR50.55e
ML20009B024
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 06/26/1981
From: Matlock R
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Engelken R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, GO2-81-159, NUDOCS 8107140678
Download: ML20009B024 (3)


Text

50.55(e) Report

. [*.

~-

Docket No. 50-397 Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 GeorgeWashingtonWay Richland, Washington 99352 (509)372-5000 June 26, 1981 Docket File 50-397 1

Mr. R. H. Engelken, Director .

y M Office of Inspection and Enforcement .

s QGt -

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

, p I p*

n s 6 g 1. 4 Region V e <g Suite 202, Walnut Creek Plaza D L l d j.l.

, .h 1990 North California Blvd. 6- I '

Walnut Creek, California 94596 3 "J U' *' " '3

\0 EuY"

Dear Mr. Engelken:

y Su r ject: SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT N0.'$ kg, it [

DOCKET N0. 50-397, CPPR-93 '

POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE 10CFR50.55(e) CONDITION, WNP-2 106 DESIGN VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC CATEGORY I, QUALITY CLASS I HVAC SYSTEM HANGERS

References:

(1) G02-80-293, dated December 15, 1980 (2) G02-81-52, dated March 10, 1981 Reference (1) provided notification and an interim report on the subject condition. Reference (2) reported on the preparation and approval of pro-cedures for hanger design and verification, and on a request to the Contrac-tor for verification of the designs for hangers considered to be permanently installed.

f From further review of the subject condition, it has been determineu that

although a breakdown in the QA Program occurred in respect to documentation l of the hanger desigr. control procedures, it would not have resulted in phy-sical deficiencies adversely affecting safe operation of the plant. It has, therefore, been concluded that the condition is not reportable as a 10CFR50.55(e) deficiency.

1 i

aSf 8107140678 810626

fl PDR ADOCK 05000397 S PDR Sl-131

t.,

'. Mr. R. H. Engelken Jura 26, 1981 Page 2 G02-81-159 The above conclusion is based on the fact that independent reviews of the Contractor's hanger design transmittals were conducted by the WNP-2 Archi-tect/ Engineer (A/E). In this review process by the A/E, Contractor designs were determined to be acceptable prior to release for fabrication and instal-lation. These acceptances are documented on the transmittals and supporting calculations are available from WNP-2 files.

This letter com titutes our final report on the subject condition.

Very truly yours, Program Director, WNP-2 HLB:kjf cc: WS Chin - BPA ND Lewis - EFSEC, Olympia TA Mangelsdorf - Bechtel 954k AI Cygelman - B&R Site RE Snaith - B&R NY AD Toth - NRC Resident Inspector JJ Verderber - B&R NY JC Plunkett, Jr. - NUS Corp.

A. Schwencer - NRC WNP-2 Files 4

. - - - , -. -- - . _ . , . , . - , . . - . . -,.--.~-...._,..._,,.,..-,.,,-..,.-..-,.-n -

, 1, NRC COMMITMENTS i

Responsible Engineer: HL Bennett .

Due Date: July 1,-1981 Summary: Reports the Seismic I, Quality I HVAL system support designs were accepted after review by the WNP-2 A/E and are not reportable as a 10CFR50.55(e) deficiency.

_ 1