ML19344E483
| ML19344E483 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 05/14/1980 |
| From: | Deardorff P, Gerber D, Martin J NUTECH ENGINEERS, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17192A929 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-06-04, TASK-6-4, TASK-RR 64.801.0013, COM-0708-03, COM-708-3, NUDOCS 8009020111 | |
| Download: ML19344E483 (116) | |
Text
lo l
I Controlled Copy No. COM-0708-03 REVISION 0 l
I
~01 X 201V A" 0 N 0 X _Y 64.801.0013 l
EVALUATION OF 18-INCH CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES FOR I
DRESDEN STATION, UNITS 2 & 3, AND l QUAD CITIES STATION, UNITS 1 & 2 I
Prepared for:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPAtW l
Prepared by:
NUTECH I
I g Man C L TL =L3 & y D.A.Gerber(P.E. J. B. Martin, P.E.
Project Engineer Project Manager M -f Date: 5//4/8o A. F.
Deardorff,
P.E l Engineering Manager '
l l
l 8 009020 'L ] ggg
REVISION CONTROL SHEET
[
SUBJECT:
EVALUATION OF 18 INCH 00NTAI4fENT ISOLATION VALVES IOR DRESDEN STATION, REPORT NUMBER: COM-0708-03 UNITS 2 6 3 AND QUAD CITIES STATION, UNIT' 62 D.A. Gerber.P.E..Se ior Engineer ,
NAME/ TITLE INITIAL T.Y. Hsu, Specialist _ < 7/I NMfE/ TITLE INITIAL F
L D. K. Mch'illiams , P. E .
Staff Encineer d#8 NAME/ TITLE INITIAL
{
T. Lem Analyst /-i NAME/ TITLE INITIAL
[ ,
NAME/ TITLE INITIAL l I
l EFFF T1 f-TIVE.C-PRE- ACCURACY CRITERIA TI'/' PRE- ACCURACY CRITERIA l
l PAGE(S] REV PARED OiECK OIECK PAGE(S) REV PARED OIECK OiECK I
O h 7l7 0 1.2 0 IM l 0 2 0 h I
$2 0 fjM 10.1 0 h 8 h 4.1- 11.1 0 82 9" 4.2 0 [l App.A 0 *
.2 0 h $ App.B ** ** M' 6.3 0 h fjM
]AR)
QEP-001.1 00 !
FluiDyne Engineering Corporation As shown on individual page L
i nutech
i I ABSTRACT I Hydrodynamic testing and strecs analysis was performed by NUTECH to evaluate stress level margins in critical compo-nents of the 18-inch butterfly valves manufactured by the Henry Pratt Company and used as drywell purge and vent con-tainment isolation valves at Dresden Station, Units 2 & 3, and Quad Cities Station, Units 1 & 2.
The purpose of this evaluation was to:
I 1. Determine the torque values for these valves during closing at various mass flow rates and incremental valve disc angles.
- 2. Verify that the valves tend to close under flow conditions.
- 3. Determine the worst case stress level margins existing in the critical load-carrying structural members of the valve during the postulated closing event.
The first stage of the evaluation consisted of hydrodynamic testing at 1/3 scale. The valve used for testing was geometrically similar to the 18-inch butterfly valve and was tested in a facility that reproduced the postulated air flow resulting from containment pressure venting through the valve to atmosphere. During the test, shaft torque values were measured at eight valve disc angles (separated l
COM-0708-03 11 l
nutech
L F
L by 10 increments) covering the range of positions from open to shut and under three sets of flow conditions
[ ranging from a containment pressure of 62.7 psia (sonic) to 20 psia (subsonic). The second stage of the evaluation consisted of an analysis of stresses in the valv'e shaft, l
pin, key and actaator arm. This analysis was performed L
using, as the loading condition, the valve shaft torque
{ values determined in the 1/3-scale valve test scaled to full scale.
T l l
~ The results of the testing indicated that the flow induced L
hydrodynamic torque tends to close the valve up to the
{ angle where the valve disc contacts the valve seat. The results of the stress analysis indicate that the worst case r
u stress level margins in the valve load-carrying structural members are acceptable.
l
{ It is concluded from this testing and analysis that the l critical internal components of the Pratt Model 2FII 18- i
[ inch butterfly valve will retain structural integrity if
- subjected to the flow induced loads resulting from a l
postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident when used as a purge and vent containment isolation valve at Dresden H
Station, Units 2 & 3. and Quad Cities Station, Units 1 & 2.
?~
b I
l COM-0708-03 111
^
nutech
, . - - - < ,w , ~ , - , - - , , - - < ,- - - . . - ,,v,,,,,-,.,---,-,,,.w--,,,,,,,------a ,~,v-
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 11 l
LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vi
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 2.0 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 3.0 TEST OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION 3.1 I 4.0 TEST FACILITY 4.1 5.0 TEST PROCEDURE 5.1 6.0 SCALING 6.1 7.0 TEST RESULTS 7.1 7.1 TORQUE COEFFICIENTS 7.3 7.2 FRICTION 7.3 8.0 STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN CRITERIA, LOADING CONDITIONS AND ANLYTICAL METHODS 8.1 8.1 DESIGN CRITERIA 8.1 8.2 LOADING CONDITIONS 8.1 8.3 ANALYTICAL METHODS 8.3 9.0 RESULTS 9.1
10.0 CONCLUSION
S 10.1 11.0 REFERL.<CES 11.1 I
l COM-0708-03 iv 1
g nutech
[
( TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
. APPENDIX A - FluiDyne Test Data Report - Measurement of Disc Torque at Various Airflow Rates in a 6-Inch Butterfly Valve l
APPENDIX B - NUTECH Stress Analysis of 18-Inch Butterfly Valve, Rev. 1, dated April 14,
[ 1980, File No. 64.801.0006 b
l
[
[
[
[
[ ;
l
[ '
E :
l l
[
F
[
[ COM-0708-03 V nutech r
M
[
[
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page
[ 7-1 SUMMARIZED TEST DATA 7.5 7-2 MAXIMUM TORQUE RESULTS 7.6 9-1
SUMMARY
OF STRESS RESULTS AND FACTORS OF SAFETY 9.2 LIST OF FIGURES
{
1 h Figure Title Page l
[ 7-1 TORQUE COEFFICIENT VS. VALVE DISC ANGLE 7.7
[
8-1 AVAILABLE TORQUE IN SYSTEM 8.4 b
[
[
[ COM-0708-03 vi nutech E .
[
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In keferences 1, 2 and 3, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested Commonwealth Edison Company to respond to generic concerns regarding containment purging or venting during normal plant operation and provided guidelines for oper-ability of containment isolation valves used for purging and venting. These operability guidelines included:
[ '
- 1. Demonstrating that the containment isolation valve actuators have sufficient torque capability to stroke the valves from full e pen to full closed within the technical specification time limit against design basis Loss of Coolant Accident containment pressure.
{
( 2. Ensuring that the valve structural elements have sufficient stress margins to withstand the concomi-
[ tant loads imposed while closing.
[
The purge and vent containment isolation valves at Dresden
[ Station, Units 2 & 3, and Quad Cities Station, Units 1 & 2, are butterfly valves manufactured by the Henry Pratt
[ Company. Discussions between the Henry Pratt Company, Commonwealth Edison Company and NUTECH (Reference 4) regarding the first operability guideline detailed above I
[ resulted in a statement from the Henry Pratt Company that these butterfly valves would tend to close under the postulated condition =.
[ COM-0708-03 1.
nutech
M
[
[
In order to address the second operability guideline, b testing and analysis was conducted to evaluate the stress margins inherent in the valves under the postulated flow
[ conditions. A series of 1/3-scale model tests were conducted at FluiDyne Engineering Corporation laboratories to determine torque values as a function of valve disc
( angle and flow rate. Analysis of the critical load-carrying components of the valve was performed utilizing the FluiDyne torque values as input. The analysia included calculation of hydrodynamic forces and a simplified stress analysis considering bending, shear and torsional shear
( loadings. Stress margins were calculated for the load bearing components utilizing standard stress allowables. ,
This report, prepared for Commonwealth Edison Company, presents the results of the 1/3-scale model test and stress
[ analysis performed on the Dresden Station, Units 2 & 3, and Quad Cities, Units 1 & 2, 18-inch containment isolation valves and provides verification of acceptable stress level margins in their critical internal structural components under a postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident.
The report summarizes the test objectives, facility, modeling and results and the stress analysis design b criteria, loading conditions, methods and results.
APPENDIX A is the FluiDyne Engineering Corporation data report. APPENDIX B is the NUTECH stress analysis.
b COM-0708-03 1.2 nutech
[ _ - - - - - -
[
[
2.0 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION b The valves used at Dresden Station, Units 2 & 3, and Quad Cities Station, Units 1 & 2, for containment purging and
[ venting are 18-inch balanced butterfly valves with external pneumatic / spring (air to open/ spring to close) valve
{
actuators. These Pratt Model 2FII valves are constructed l
( with a cast iron body, a 2-1/4 inch diameter type 304 stainless steel shaft and nylon bearings. The valve is mounted in horizontal rem of pipe with the shaft vertically oriented. The actuators are aligned horizontally and are attached to the valve shaft through a l
[ 1ever arm which is keyed to the shaft with a cold drawn steel key. The valve disc is attached to the valve shaft with one stainless steel pin.
[ Each plant uses two of these valves in series in the
[ drywell purge and vent line. These valves are located outside containment and serve the function of containment isolation valves. In the postulated event that these valves are open for purging or venting and a design basis Loss of Coolant Accident occurs, these valves must be
{ capable of closing within the technical specification time limits and provide containment integrity.
L ,
[ COM-0708-03 2.1 L
nutech
[I --
4 I
3.0 TEST OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION The objective of the 1/3 scale test of the Pratt Model 2FII butterfly valve was to ascertain representative torque coefficient values as a function of valve disc angle over a range of air mass flow rates. The test program was con-ducted in accordance with the NUTECH test specification (Reference 5) .
I During the first stage of a postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident when the subject containment isolation valves are closing, the containment environment will be a mixture of air and steam. Analysis indicates that a discharge of air through the valve results in approximately the same torque values and slightly higher flow rates than does a discharge of steam under the same conditions (Reference 6). There fore , for conservatism, the test program was run using an all air discharge through the valve.
I The initial screening tests were run using three dif ferent upstream pressures (approximately 62.7, 38.0 and 20.0 psia venting to atmosphere through the test valve) with test valve disc settings between 8 and 78 from fully open in 10 degree increments. The test pressures were selected using the following criteria:
, COM-0708-03 3.1 l
Ll nutech
~
[ l
[
- 1. The largest test pressure was to simulate the highest
( containment transient pressure (62.7 psia) (Ref. 7) l b 2. The smallest test pressure was to be sufficiently low to ensure subsonic flow through the valve (20 psia) .
{
Sonic flow would occur when upstream pressure exceeds
[ 26.9 psia.
- 3. The intermediate pressure would be between the other two pressures but would still ensure so..ic flow (38.0
[
psia).
[
The final test runs were comprised of setting the valve disc at the tn angles that resulted in the largest torque values in the initial screening tests and then decreasing the upstream pressure in 4 psia increments from 62.7 psia down past a pressure that yielded a maximum torque value.
{
This set of runs was performed to ensure that the maximum
( torque value for the system was measured, since the initial screening test runs had large gaps in the pressure range.
(
i
[
(
COM-0708-03 3.2
[
nutech 1
[
[
4.0 TEST FACILITY
[ The test facility employed for these tests was located at FluiDyne Engineering Corporation's Medicine Lake Aero-
[ dynamics Laboratory. This facility (depicted in Figure 1 of APPENDIX A) was used to supply a known cir flow rate with a uniform flov distribution to the test valve. High )
pressure dried air was supplied at 500 psi to a control l
{
valve where it was throttled, metered through a choked standard ASME long-radius flow nozzle and discharged into a stagnation chamber. Uniform air flow from the stagnation
[ chamber then flowed through the 6-inch test valve and a 92.5 inch long, 6-inch straight discharge pipe to
{
atmosphere. The stagnation chamber was comprised of a b sufficient number of baffles and expansion areas to ensure uniform flow from the stagnation chamber outlet.
The 6-inch test valve was a standard Pratt Model 2FII valve
{
with a custom fabricated scaled valve disc and shaft
[ (depicted in Figure 2 of APPENDIX A) . The disc was fabri-cated at Fluidyne on a contour machining mill utilizing dimensions received from actual field measurements of an I 18-inch Model 2FII valve which were scaled to 1/3 size.
The shaft was fabricated to accept the disc and was keyed
[ to an adjustable face plate which provided disc angles in increments of 10 degrees. In this way, the flow path COM-0708-03 4.1 nutech
l l
l through the valve was virtually an exact 1/3-scale representation of the 18-inch valve.
l Test instrumentation consisted of:
(1) pressure taps connected to the A W. fl.ow nozzle , to l
measure air mass flow rate l (2) a Seegers hourdon-tube pressure gauge to measure upstream total pressure (3) a shielded iron-constantan thermocouple probe to ;
I '
measure upstream total temperature (4) a Heise bourdon-tube pressure gauge to measure total l pressure at the valve (5) a shielded iron-constantan thermocouple probe to l measure total temperature at the valve (6) six static pressure taps downstream of the valve connected to multiple tube mercury manometers and (7) a strain gauge torque meter.
I The readings of the pressure gauges and mercury manometers were recorded on Polaroid film. The outouts from the A W.
nozzle, thermocouples and torque meter were recorded on the test facility data system.
I Test calibration records for this instrumentation are presented in of APPENDIX A.
I COM-0708-03 4.2 1
l nutech
[
[
5.0 TEST PROCEDURE
[
- 1. The valve disc angle, a, was set by the lab mechanic
[ and verified by the test engineer at each position.
[ All valve pressures were run at this setting before a was changed.
- 2. The barometric pressure was measured (Hass mercury
[ barometer) before each run and was used in the data reduction.
{
b 3. Before each test, the cameras on the Pg7 and Pt2 (total pressure) gauges were checked and cocked.
- 4. Pre-run outputs of electronic instrumentation were
{
recorded using the digital data system.
- 5. At the direction of the test engineer, air flow was 1 initated by a mechanic opening a manual control valve. The total pressure at the test valve was the
{
independent variable monitored by the valve
( operator. The control pressure was observed using a 0-200 psi Heise differential pressure gauge.
[
COM-0708-03 5.1 nutech r
i . . . .
[
[ 6. When steady flow was established, all data was
[ simultaneously recorded (torque meter and thermo-couples on data system and pressure gauges and manometer on Polaroid film) . Flow was then terminated.
[ 7. Post-run outputs were recorded.
b 8. All results and inputs were verified for transcrip-tion accuracy or any electronic anomalies.
9a. For run numbers 1-24, one set of data per discharge j
{
was taken.
9b. For run numbers 25-30, only the torque meter output and total pressure at the test valve was recorded.
The output was recorded at approximately 4 psi
{
intervals of P t2 All other procedures were as
(- described above.
[ l l
b E
l
[ !
{
coM-0708-03 5.2 j
[
nutech
[
[
6.0 SCALING CONSIDERATION
[ Investigations into the hydrodynamic torque characteristics of butterfly valves (Reference 8) indicate that non-
[ dimensional torque coefficients developed for symmetric butterfly valves can be applied to varying sizes of valves
{ '
with similar geometries. The basis for scaling the 1/3-( scale model torque results up to full size follows: l 3
Torque = C ,y 9 T
[
Where
[
C7 = Torque coefficient p = Density of air V = Velocity of air at valve disc edge D =
Diameter of valve opening
[
For a perfect gas, which air is assumed to be, the density and velocity can be determined as follows:
,=yP
[
V = M OgRT
[
Cos-0708-03 6.1
[
F
[
M = Mach Number
{
P = Static Pressure
[ R = Universal gas constant T = Temperature of the air
[ Y = Ratio of specific heats g =
Gravitational constant
{
[ There fore :
Torque = CT( ) (M/YgRT) D 3 = C TPM YgD
[ Since the 1/3-scale model duplicates the relative geometry
{ of the full size valve, the pressure characteristics of the 1/3-scale flow path should be identical to those of the full size valve for the same inlet and discharge pressures. Therefore, the ratio of static to total P
pressure pt and the ratio of static to discharge pressure P
p at the valve disc should be identical for the scaled
{- atm and full size valves .
b Since P atm is assumed to be the same, for the same total !
b (
(containment) pressure, the static pressure at the valve
{ disc is the same for the scaled and full size valves.
Since the flow characteristics are the same, the Mach b number M is also identical. A final assumption is that at b COM-0708-03 6.2
[
nutech
[ !
b any given disc angle, CT remains constant for all valve sizes of the same geometry.
The scaling ratio is calculated as follows:
{
[ Torque ign P
CT (P18") M28 ( 18")3
" ~
t Torque 6,, P
C ( ) M Yg (D6 ")3 T
t
{ ( ,
C T, M, Y, g all identical for 6" and 18" valves)
[
For a given total pressure Pt in the scaled and full size valve:
b Torque 18" D 18" Torque 6" (h /
Therefore the scale factor for torque is (18 ) - 27
{
[
[
[
h COM-0708-03 6.3 nutech
t
[ ;
l
[
7.0 TEST RESULTS Table 7-1 summarizes the data from the test program.
[
Included in this table are the measured valve disc angle, total pressure at the test valve and torque. For the subsonic test runs, the calculated torque coefficien*.s are also tabulated. Torque values for the final two sets of
~
tests are presented in Figure 5 of the data report (APPENDIX A) . The final two sets of tests were run in an h effort to determine experimentally the naximum torque valua that could be obtained from the test facility. Table 7.2 b presents the maximum torque values measured in the first phase of the testing scaled to full size for each of the ;
{
three containment pressures. In addition, the maximum
( torque scaled to full size for the second phase of the testing is presented.
Based on the form of the scaling factor for torque
{
developed in Section 6.0, it was possible to calculate full f size valve tr:rque values without the use of specifically determined torque coefficients. However, as a check on the validity of the tests results obtained, torque coefficients were calculated for the P t = 20 psia case, for which the assumption of incompressible flow is valid, and were
[ compared to the torque coefficients developed in Refer-ence 8. The two sets of torque coefficients are plotted in b
COM-0708-03 7.1
[
nutech r _ -.
a
[
( Figure 7-1. They are relatively close, thus providing a check that the subsonic torque values from this test are reasonable.
[
Several negative torque values (tending to open the value)
[ occur in the test data. At the R from full open angle ,
the case with subsonic flow over the valve disc (Pt" 20 psia) exhibited a positive torque value while the two sonic cases (38.0 and 62.7 psia) exhibited relatively small
[ negative torque values. This may be explained by likening the valve disc to an airfoil in which the valve shaft is at
{
mid-chord. The transition from subsonic to sonic flow
[ causes the aerodynamic center, through which the hydrodynamic force acts, to move from the leading surface
[ of the valve disc (positive torque) to the approximate location of the valve shaft. This location can yield a
{
small positive or negative torque. At the 68 and 78
( angles, negative torque values were also measured. These angles correspond to the orientation at which the valve
[ disc progressively contacts and deforms t'ae valve seat. At l
these orientations, the friction and seat-induced forces become relatively large as the seat material resists
[ further deformation by exerting a force against the vcive disc as r'te seat attempts to restore its original shape.
[
COM-0708-03 7.2 nutech f
s
(
[
7.1 Torque Coefficients Torque coefficients were calculated as follows for the subsonic (M < 0.7) flow case (P t = 20 psia):
[
[ Data from test: Torque Total pressure: P t
Static pressure: P s
From Bernoulli's equation: P t
=P g + 1/2 pV 2 or pV2 = 2(P t -P) g
{
l
[ also Torque = C pV 23D t
[ rearranging and combining
[ Torque C =
2(P t -P)D g
7.2 Friction It was intended in this test to ensure that the values of friction in the valve were relatively small so as to allow the most accurate determination of
[ hydrodynamic torque. As presented in Section 4.0 of the APPENDIX A data report, the measured torque to overcome friction was less than 107. of the maximum hydrodynamic torque values except at a valve disc
[ COM-0708-03 7.3 nutech iu - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - -
[
[ angle of 78* at which point the valve disc was contacting the valve seat. It was conservative to minimize the friction in the test valve because, in the full size valve, friction will resist the forces
[
that tend to shot the valve thus lowering the I
actuator force and the bending applied to the shaft
{ I by the actuator. The effect of friction in the test was to counteract the flow-generated hydrodynamic torque, thus reducing in sbsolute value the torque
[ measured by the torque meter. For this reason, the absolute value of the torque meter output was
{
increased by the static friction-generated torque
( values, and the resulting torque values are presented in Table 7-1.
[
As an example, the 1/3-scale. torque value for the case with valve disc angle of 38* and Pt = 38 psia
( was calculated as follows:
[ Torque meter reading: 80.1 in-lbs.
Friction at 38 7.0 in-lbs.
87.1 in-lbs .
[
[
COM-0708-03 7.4
{
nutech
( .
[
TABLE 7-1 SUMMARIZED TEST DATA Angle (degrees) P t (Psia) Torque (in-lbs) CT
[
8 63.32 -20.0 18 62.53 62.4 28 62.23 58.9 38 62.46 71.6 48 63.06 64.9 58 62.96 43.8
_ 58 62.86 49.8 .
68 63.26 -25.1 l 62.23 -76.2 78
[ 78 62.93 -70.4 8 38.32 -13.9 i 38.13 35.3
[ 18 28 38.28 62.6 l
38 38.46 87.1 48 38.46 76.6
[ 58 58 37.96 37.86 37.1 37.0 68 37.86 -12.4
{ 78 38.23 -49.9 8 20.22 36.3 .0152 18 20.03 65.9 .0271
[ 28 20.23 18.36 66.5 .0255 38 50.6 .0278 48 20.16 37.1 .0140
[ 48 58 20.06 19.76 36.8 23.6
.0141
. (.
68 19.86 -8.3 . 06. ,
78 20.03 31.5 .0126
{
[
[ -
[
[
COM-0708-03 7.5 b'
nutech
[ -
r L
{ TABLE 7-2 _
MAXIMUM TORQUE RESULTS g P t
Valve Disc Angle Maximura Full Scale Torque L (psia) (degrees) (ft-ibs)
[ 62.7 18 14r' 38.0 38 196 20.0
~
18 148 32.0-35.0 38 216 E
u E
E I
l L
E I
I I
l I
j COM-0708-03 7.6 l nutech i _ _ _ - - - - - -
- m = .
O O
- y
.u.
" m.
o M 1m o
y ^
4~
. ,, w 2Y m "fo 2m '
,m m 8?g ** .o~
O M m '
m3
>=
W
~ G O 2"t5 ro 9 E'
=o .g~z 02 EE o a o r C
] 8, O g _
,x l
] N 0
8x m
] 9 x o C n
J Q m, -
e n-s
] W E
m
.g p O
] "6 O
] .
? ? 5 o o k o TNEICIFFEOC EUQROT
] t4 un}O3y
8.0 STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN CRITERIA, LOADING CONDITION AND ANALYTICAL METHODS The stress analysis of the valve is presented in
( APPENDIX B. The design criteria, loadings and analytical methods used are presented below.
{
( 8.1 Design Criteria The purpose of the analysis was to analytically determine that the stress levels in the valve load-carrying structural members were within limits that would preclude yielding for those members as the
( valve is closed against a flow rate generated by a postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident.
This criteria would ensure that during closing, the active valve parts would not deform.
( 8.2 Loading Condition The loading condition considered in the stress analysis of the butterfly valve included hydrodynamic torque and valve actuator restraining force. Dead
[
weight and seismic forces were considered to be negligible.
{ l Torque loading of the valve shaft was based on the I
l torque coefficients determined in the 1/3-scale valve COM-0708-03 8.1 nutech f _-
[
test. Full size torque values were calculated from
[- the experimentally determined 1/3-scale torque values shown in Tables 7-1 and 7-2 to which a conservative
{_
factor was added.
Valve actuator force was conservatively calculated based on the assumption that the actuator balanced the hydrodynamic torque generated in the valve at each valve disc angle. The valve actuator is comprised of an air cylinder / spring combination. The spring is attached to a piston inside the air
[ cylinder and forces the valve closed when there is no air in the cylinder. To open the valve, the cylinder
{
is pressurized with air such that the air pressure on
[ the piston overcomes the spring force. Upon a containment isolation signal, the air in the cylinder is bled out through an orifice thus permitting the spring to gradually close the valve. If the flow induced hydrodynamic torque is positive (to close the
{ valve) , the effect is to compress the air in the cylinder. The upper curve in Figure 8-1 represents the torque available from the air compression force in the cylinder which can resist this closing torque. If the flow induced hydrodynadic torque is
{ negative (to open the valve), th effect is to compress the spring. The lower curve in Figure 8-1 COM-0708-03 8.2 nutech F
L
[?
represents the torque available from the spring force
{
which can resist this opening torque. Since the
[ upper and lower curves envelope the calculated hydrodynamic torque, during a postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident, the valve will close at the normal operating rate governed by the initial air pressure, orifice size and spring constant.
8.3 Analytical Methods The butterfly valve was analyzed to determine the stress level margins in the valve load-carrying active components during the postulated flow condition.
{
b The analysis consisted of determination of bending, -
torsion and shear loads on the valve shaft, key, pin and actuator arm at valve disc angles ranging from 8 to 78 from full open. Hydrodynamic torque values
{
were conservatively based on experimental test-( results reported in Section 6.0 of-this Report.
Bending and torsional moments and shear forces were calculated at the actuator arm attachment, upper and lower bearings and the pin. The maximum shear stress due to combined bending, torsion and shear was then
( calculated and compared to a maximum shear stress allowable of 1/2 yield strength to generate safety
[- factor values.
( COM-0708-03 8.3 nutech F
[
[
AVAILABLE TOROUE IN SYSTEM 15,000
[
12,000 AVAILABLE AIR CYLINDER RESTRAINING TORQUE-
_ ADIABATIC COMPRESSION
{ $
T 9,000 l t uo
(' g 6,000 O
{
3,000 #
HYDRODYNAMIC TORQUE I'5 30 45 6'O 73 (DEGREES)
[ TORQUE AVAILABLE TO t -3,000 CLOSE VALVE FROM SPRING (ZERO PRESSURE IN AIR CYLINDER)
[ FIGURE 8-l l
{
{
- ^
nutech
( .
(
(
9.0 STRESS ANALYSIS RESULTS
( The stress and safety factor values for the stress analysis are presented in Table 9-1. The critical location in the
[ valve was determined to be the shaft at the valve di.sc-to-shaft pin, where a conservatively calculated factor of
{
safety of 1.33 was calculated.
[
[.
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
COM-0708-03 9.1
{
nutech
( - - - - - -
[
[ TABLE 9-1 F-
SUMMARY
OF STRESS RESULTS AND FACTORS OF SAFETY
[
STRESS AND FACTOR OF SAFETY (in brackets) b SHAFT:
LOCATION UPPER LOLTER
[ VALVE KEY BEARING PIN BEARING
{ ANGLE
[
8 11.235 ksi
[ (1.34) 18 3.110 ksi 11.257 ksi 2.607 ksi
{ (4.8) (1.33) (5.75) 28 3.055 ksi 7.555 ksi 2.106 ksi (4.91) (1.99) (7.12)
[ 38 4152.7 ksi 4.291 ksi 10.194 ksi 1.010 ksi (3.6) (3.50) (1.47) (14.9) b 48 3.331 ksi 10.711 ksi 0.439 ksi (4. 5) (1.40) (34.1) l
[ \
[ KEY: Shear Stress 1.293 ksi Comp. Stress 2.586 ksi PIN: Unit Working Stress 2.032 ksi ACTUATOR ARM: Bending Stress 1.755 ksi
[ .COM-0708-03 9.2 nutech E - - - - - - -
L l
[ l
[
10.0 CONCLUSION
S The stress analysis of the Pratt Model 2FII 18-inch butterfly valve included as APPENDIX B indicates that the
[ loads and stresses imposed upon the active load-carrying components during a valve closure under a postulated design I
{
basis Loss of Coolant Accident event are within acceptable
[ limits and that stress margins are sufficient to ensure no deformation of the active valve parts will occur when the
[ valve is used as a containment isolation valve in the Dresden Station, Units 2 & 3 or Quad Cities Station, Units
{
1 and 2. The loads used in the stress analysis were based
( upon results from the Fluidyne Engineering Corporation 1/3-scale valve test, included as APPENDIX A.
[
[
[
[
[
[ .
i
[ l l
COM-0708-03 10.1
{
nutech
= - .-- . . , . - . - .---y. v
[
l
11.0 REFERENCES
l
- 1. Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter from Mr. Thomas )
[: Ippolito to Mr. Cordell Reed (Commonwealth Edison ,
Company) " Containment Purging During Normal Planc l Operation", dated November 29, 1978.
- 2. Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter from Mr. Darrell G.
Eisenhut to All Light Water Reactors, " Containment Purging and Venting During Normal Operation - Guidelines
{ for Valve Operaht11ty" dated September 27, 1979.
- 3. Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter from Mr. Dennis L.
[ Ziemann to Mr. D. Louis Peoples (Commonwealth Edison Company), " Containment Purging and Venting During Normal Operation", dated October 23, 1979.
[ 4. NUTECH letter COM-0708-01 from Mr. D. A. Gerber, to Mr.
H. L. Gustin (Commonwealth Edison Company), " Henry Pratt Company Meeting Report", dated December 10, 1979.
{
- 5. NUTECH Test Specification COM-0708-02, " Determination of Torque Coefficients for the Dresden 2/3 and Quad Cities
[- 1/2-18 Inch Butterfly Containment Isolation Valves",
dated February 8, 1980.
[ 6. NUTECH Hydrodynamic Analysis of Pratt 18 Inch Butterfly Valve, Revision 0 dated December 3, 1974, File No.
64.801.0004.
- 7. Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 - Final Safety Analysis Report.
( 8. T. Sarpkaya, "Torgue and Cavitation Characteristics of Butterfly Valves,' Journal of Aoplied Mechanics, Transactions of the ASME, Number 60-WA-105, December 1961, pp. 511 - 518.
{
[
[
[
[.
COM-0708-03 11.1 nutech F
[
[
[
[
[- !
l I
I
[ APPENDIX A FluiDyne Test Data Report 1
Measurement of Disc Torque at Various
[ Airflow Rates in a 6-Inch Butterfly Valve
[
[ .
[
[ l
[. !
[:
[
COM-0708-03
{-
nutech l
MhMNEb ENQiNEERING CCRPORATION
[ : APR 181980 J Lb Q9Lb u U Lbd
[ .....................
[
[ ~
MEASUREMENT OF DISC TORQUE AT VARIOUS A1RFLOW RATES
{ IN A 6-INCH BUTTERFLY VALVE
^
~
l l
l l
_ BY Gary J. Felix Nebojsa D. Kovacevic
[ !
l Conducted for Nutech 145 Martinvale Lane E- San Jose, California 95119
{ Nutech Engineering Services Agreement 8 February 1980 FluiDyne Report 1240 March 1980 l Project Engineer:
g
- Approved: M Richard G.'Brasket 4.s /[
V Group Head, Test Operations Reviewed and , / & J
[ & O* ten P. Lamir Checked by:
Vice President A-1 E ----- - . _ . - . -. - - . - -
L
[EipfDYNE EN'2tNEERING CORPORATION
[
(
SUMMARY
This report presents the results of tests conducted to
{
- determine the torque on the shaft of a modified 6-inch Pratt model 2FII butterfly valve at various airflow rates and valve disc positions. The tests were performed by FluiDyne Engineer-ing Corporation for Nutech in the Channel 7 test stand at FluiDyne's Medicine Lake Aerodynamic Laboratory.
The test valve was obtained by replacing the standard disc with a disc geometrically similar to that in a particular 18-inch valve. Tests were made at disc settings from 8* to
{
78* (nearly closed) in 10* increments. The total pressure of the approach flow was varied from 62.7 psia to 20 psia, with the flow exhausting to atmosphere through a straight pipe downstream of the valve. Torque on the disc shaft was measured using a strain-gage torque meter, b Test results for each vane setting include valve shaft torque, airflow total pressure, total temperature and mass
{ flow rate, and six static pressures in the pipe just down-stream of the valve. The effective open area of the valve was calculated from the airflow quantitites.
{
l
[
[
[ A-2 f -
[AufDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
{ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
SUMMARY
i TABLE OF CONTENTS ii '
LIST OF FIGURES iii ,
LIST OF SYMBOLS iii l l-0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 TEST APPARATUS 2 2.1 Channel 7 Facility 2 2.2 Butterfly Valve 2 3.0 DATA ACQUISITION AND CALCULATIONS 4 3.1 Flow Rate 4 l 3.2 Conditions at Test Valve 5 l 3.3 Torque Measurement 5 4.0 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS 7 REFERENCES 9
( FIGURES g DATA AND CAtCUtArIONS Appenai:.
i l
1 l
l l
I A-3 l
l
N
[ggstDYNE ENT.INEERING CORPORATION
( LIST OF FIGURES Figure Description
[ 1 Valve Test Installation (1240-001) 2 Valve Test Assembly (1240-002) 3 Vane (Disc) (1240-401) 4 Photographs of Valve Test Setup L 5 Run Schedule and Major Test Results 6 Torque versus Valve Angle 7 Torque versus Total Pressure 8 Flow Rate versus Valve Angle 9
Effective Flow Area versus Valve Angle
[
LIST OF SYMBOLS
{ A Cross section area, in C
D Discharge Coefficient, dimensionless K Critical flow factor, R* ! /sec.
M Mach number, dimensionless P
Pressure, static unless otherwise specified by subscript, psia
[ R Reynolds number, dimensionless l
N T Temperature, *R W Flow rate, Ibm /sec a Valve angle, degrees Subscripts 1 ASME meter conditions 2 Valve approach conditions t Total conditions
{ eff Effective A-4 F - - - - - -
[14#EOYNE EN^2iNEERING CORPORATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This test program was conducted to measure the torque and airflow characteristics of a 6-inch butterfly valve.
{ - The test valve was a 1/3 scale simulation of an 18-inch isolation valve in a nuclear power plant. The disc and shaft in the 6-inch valve were designed and fabricated by
{ FluiDyne using disc contours defined by Nutech.
The test program was defined by Nutech Test Specification COM-0708-02, " Determination of Torque Coefficients for the Dresden 2/3 and Quad Cities 1/2 18-inch Butterfly Containment Isolation Valves." Technical liaison for Nutech was performed by Mr. Dave Gerber.
This report describes the test apparatus, test conditions, data acquisition and analysis procedures, and presents the test results. Test conditions and major test results are tabulated in Fure 5 and are plotted in Figures 6-9. Detailed data and calculations are tabulated in the Appendix.
l A-5 I
l .
[M#fDYNE EN'2iNEERING CORPORATION
[
2 .' 0 TEST APPARATUS 2.1 Channel 7 Facility The tests were performed in Channel 7 at FluiDyne's-( ' Medicine Lake Aerodynamics Laboratory. Channel 7 is a test stand (operating since 1956) normally used for determining
{ thrust and flow rate performance of scale-model exhaust nozzles for jet or rocket engines. For the present tests, Channel 7 was used only to supply a known flow rate, with a uniform flow distribution, to che valve assembly. A 92.5-inch long, 6-inch diameter pipe was installed downstream of the valve exhausting to atmosphere.
( The basic arrangement of this facility is indicated in Figure 1. High-pressure dried air from the facility LOO psi
[ storage system was throttled at the control valve, metered through a choked standard ASME long-radius flow nozzle, and discharged into a stagnation chamber. Uniform flow from the stagnation chamber was obtained at the entrance to the test valve.
Facility instrumentation was provided to measure the flow
[ rate, the total temperature and pressure upstream of the valve, and six static pressures just downstream of the valve. Details are described in Section 3.0.
2.2 Butterfly Valve Figure 2 is an assembly drawing of the valve and torque meter assembly. As indicated, the valve was a standard 6-inch Pratt model 2FII valve, with a custom-fabricated disc and shaft.
The disc is defined in Figure 2. Photographs of the valve assembly are shown in Figure 4.
[ A-6
( - - - -
[EUEDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION E
The end of the shaft was keyed into an adjustable face-plate to provide incremental (10') disc settings. The 0*
f position was defined as fully-open.
~
I 1
s -
i l
l l
l l
b k
p i
I l o ~
fg&# DYNE ENQlNEERING CORPORATION l
l l 3.0 DATA ACQUISITION AND CALCULATIONS l l
l The following subsections describe data acquisition and l
analysis procedures used in the present test program. Station
. notations are defined in Figure 1. A computer program for data i reduction, written in BASIC language, is included in the Appendix.
I l 3.1 Flow Rate I .
I The actual mass flow rate through the test valve was de- }
termined with a choked ASME long-radius metering nozzle at l Station 1. I C P l Ky DA yy ty W y =W 2" I
l 4
l j
t I
l The meter discharge coefficient (CDy) was calculated as a function of throat Reynolds number, using a semi-empirical I equation.
-0.2 R
Dy = 1 - 0.184 Ny Dy varied between 0.987 and 0.993 for the present tests.
~
The critical flow factor, K, was calculated as a function of total pressure and total temperature. The equation for K, applicable to the range of P and T n rmally encountered in t ;
the present test facility, was obtained from Reference 1:
K= .53160 + (P + 16.9) [1.581 .00834 (T - 520)] x 10' P is in units of psia, and T is in *R.
t 1
l l
l
[AufDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1
l A y, the meter geometric throat area, had three different values, depending on the open area in the test valve. They were:
2 2 2 4.905 in , .8028 in , and .1955 in . Meter pressure, P , was l
- measured with a Seegers bourdon-tube pressure gauge and recorded on Polaroid film. T was measured using a shielded iron-constantan thermocouple probe. The thermocouple output was recorded on the I facility digital data system. Flow rates calculated for the present tests varied from .257 to 28.5 lb ,/sec.
l The effective flow area of the valve was calculated as D
A = 2 2 eff tK22 j K was evaluated, using a previous equation defining the critical 2
flow factor, as a function of t and t The above equation 2 2 for A therefore assumes choked flow through the valve. l eff 3.2 Condition at Test Valve The total pressure at the valve, P t2, was measured with a Heise bourdon-tube pressure gauge and recorded on Polaroid film.
T t
2 was measured using a shielded iron-constantan thermocouple probe and the facility data system.
Static pressures were measured at 3, 6, and 9 inches downstream of the valve in the 6-inch diameter pipe at two circumferential positions (see Figure 1). Static pressures were measured using multiple tube mercury manometers (atmospheric reference) and re-corded on Polaroid film. Pressures vere reduced to absolute pressures (psia) and are listed on the computer output sheets.
3.3 Torque Measurement The torque developed at the shaft end was measured with an existing FluiDyne torque meter. This device is a cylindrical A-9 l 1
l
[KUfDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION I
tube wired to sense small strains in the torsional direction only. In general, all other bending moments and shear stresses (if they exist) cancel in the stress measurement output. The
- torque meter output was recorded on the facility data system.
Prior to testing,the torquemeter was loaded with known I moments in the ranges and directions to be encountered during A curve of known applied moment versus readout signal testing.
l was generated to give torque as a function of torquemeter output. Positive moments are defined to be in the direction tending to close the valve. After the tests the calibration was repeated.
I The post-test calibration agreed to within 0.05% of the pre-test calibration used to reduce the test data.
I I
I I
'I I
I I
I A-10 I _ _ - .
[KUEDYNE EN'21NEERING CORPORATION 4.0 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS Test conditions and major test results are tabulated in
- Figure 5 and are plotted in Figures 6-9. Detailed data and
, calculations are contained in the Appendix.
Figure 5, sheet 1, presents the results for tests at I
valve settings of 8* to 78*, for nominal values of P t = 62.7, 2
38 and 20 psia. A few repeat runs were made either to demonstrate data repeatability or because of incomplete data acquisition. Extra runs are denoted by *. The tabulation
{ includes run number, valve angle, measured torque, air total temperature and total pressure at the valve, measured mass
{ flow rate, and the effective open area of the valve.
Figure 5, sheet 2, presents the results of tests during P
which valve angle was fixed (at 38* and 48*) and t was varied 2
between 62.7 and 20 psia.
Measured torque values are plotted versus valve angle in l Figure 6. The symbols denote nominal values of t = 62.7, 38 2
and 20 psia. The dashed curve, shown for reference only, is
{ an approximate prediction of torque using an incompressible flow relation from Reference 2. The present data at t = 20 2
psia compare reasonably well with the prediction. The Mach number through the valve is approximately 0.7 for P t = 20 psia.
P 2 With t = 38 and 62.7 psia, the flow through the valve is choked 2
(M = 1).
b At valve angles greater than about 65 , the measured torque was negative, i.e., was in the direction to resist closing of
{ the valve. This resistance is attributed to friction of the disc on the rubber valve seat, and is greater than the aerodynamic r' torque which approaches zero as a approaches 90 . At the con-clusion of the test program, the frictional torque on the valve 1
A-11 1 _ - - -
L Test! DYNE ENCINEERING CORP! RATION
[
{ with no flow was measured. This measurement was accomplished by disconnecting the torgia meter, and applying a trrque-wrench to the end of the shaft. 'lhe torque was recorded when rotation of
[ . the shaft was first noticed. The apparent torque due to valve
, friction at various valve settings is tabulated below, a, degrees Torque, ia-lbs a, degrees Torque, in-lbs i
( 8 5 48 7 18 6 58 7 l 28
{ 7 68 7 36 7 78 30
[ Referring to Figure 6, maximum values of torque appear to be obtained at valve angles near 40*. Additional tests (Figure 5, sheet 2) were then made in which pressure was varied to search for the maximum torque at fixed valve settings. The results are
[ plotted in Figure 7. The previous data from Figure 6 are included i
for comparison. I Flow rates and corresponding effective flow areas are plotted {
in Figures 8 and 9.
{
The reduction in A eff at t 2
= 20 psia, compared to the higher pressure results, is due to unchoking of the valve. l l
( l l
[ 1
[ '
[
A-12 V - - - -
fli/EOYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION f
l F REFERENCES L
p 1. Reimer, R. M., " Computation of the Critical Flow Function,
. Pressure Ratio, and Temperature Ratio for Real Air."
ASME Paper 162-WA-177. 1962.
- 2. Sarpkaya, Turgut, " Torque and Cavitation Characteristics
[ of Butterfly Valves." Journal of Applied Mechanics, Trans. ASME, December 1961, pp. 511-518.
L
[
[
[
E
(
E E
[
[
[
A-13 r
l1ll' j C
he% n x ,' T2EENMx Ze>
l f
i ogm?b2>jUZ -
R-
- ]i [ R- _
-o
)* r 1
w %:1-M R .
- m. 2% :=
- _t 1
a
~.
t 0 9 4 R m_ m . 2 s=. Ev
-E 0
f
=
~
~-
~
. pfi - -
sY ~
':u R. e o
=a i , .
1-T- w eM 2t - _ l
.~-
r_[b_ 9 k- ._- _2 ._' R - _ _ b"l .. . . , R g
= ,. "
N
~ A
_. _ O l ,j
. '" . I T
R ( nm r i A L L A
.. i .a, , T an .
_ S s -- L' _ ]. N R .d& y
. jJ I
T jtp, _ - - w s [
,x ((
g b S E R_ g - i' _; ., T J-
- -) 3 P,i
;T ,
E V x L 7,,,_-,, _- - r v A R _
,V m
fT,, g,{
.p;$
c. 1 R .\.'_
] - .
- 'j.j' /, _
E
. ..- R U
..# G G . 1_ 1,{l-I
/-
i QegI F R D 5 f R R _ R 1 ._
- y. A l ,
L [1WOYNE EN521NEERIN3 CORPORATION r i L p I I I IEG1 _ L i jj l 1 i li . i l
.: n :
L a- in w?r! 9
- j.
- Py
- a=ea i
4
.:; l l, :i I':
'- g n: k'h . . nl 5: if L @N,e.5 h.. h. ,: lh h,. .l
* ,EhI.I I f: 0 apmu g! q,.-
hlkk'.lUfl! ,i!b l p ' i A. n' l! .,' u i "e
.s p,u b tn.i
, l"l ,i'ti. ii. n e ,! l 8
(~ -G c. 1 I} il k j j!
.i.
,' l,1,
- z! .
F %' r . .,c.6 w, ' h**(.
.* ; ; e a*16
[ g T"'* ?"* eN avnha. 53 9 l1'
,'.1, . _ .y
% t , ,, -
F
- 4. . . p
,,x
, s t
I k 3 b L <5 --- 'N ' !' $
.s # _,
g x
~N
=
. $ N.WN =u t
3 N m i e 4 p .- 4, ,/ m
, i i
.6 M
'e -
y L N., .) y'
-s' ~~ , .
N
-EMI
- l 7 >
a u I . _ _ t
-q j _ >
+-
._ - ; x ;.
v-
~,
{t I r. N . M o N x\ L i i p A r -. rg \ 'N. A
'N L - N xf Es
, /" ,
,,- A ,pi
' ,/
f* ikk '
&r ', - "# 4. . j a A
%* g E
1 P A-15
[AufDYNE EN:2tNEERING CORPORATION L l l l EEEE a.! t i 3 I v-- -
- ., u -
l r i its 5m; 'l 1 %,f L s. .. ;
, ij; a . o ug 0 Iri i ag$$ 0 WN5 I 5",
-kS y!
j 'si,1 -,ii t: F -. I e
-/ 8 L \@'~:g:p o b u. f is -
*5% 2 P4 ao1 ;.
.? * '
g py E. l a:
$5!>[!!!!!.04 g bE : e i,
! i lli ! !
)J Q l e o r !
L %" '/ li!!
- s i
.l >
(a u) [ l'I sto _ O t.0 H Q w a Z 1 4 S o - > wo
; p- e
; 3i ,A M
-?- ne d,. y ', *
.n g es nu '
[ J d
\
l l t
'l ,
! X
\
C O [
-l-h -
Mt- - h-
\ .+. _ - z s-
- .a
\ < ?
F' ' N ? k s r
# ${ _ ._ ! J ! ,
i6 9 i f , 3 e. .
"~
ol6 n. f e-
- c. W5Mc;<!~
l [. w
'V Q., ,
I i 1 A-16 j
i ; M m m m ;<- m . : ; M . _ .
~
.-: M
# ~
p ?. I' -
.l Il ,
,e p' 4 ~
..f. .._ .
y- .- .. ~~ .; l a i $,
..y .
. j.*
ju-e
.- ', 'N.% t-
. p ; _-
.l.. .- )
rh Y
})
. ~-
', ji- w, '
(
,e ; b ^ %i
. Ce f . '
. ."::.. _f.
.R . .:;. .; q ;.
.. . - L - . 3 ; ,
m_ . kU .;'.. '
. . ;.+,.. .. . q,. ;g 4'
~
; *9g
- r, . ;.
4.. .s, . 3.
- p. pn
( r ,
.~- . h f ,;? '
'N' ^* l ' *
'? }- l &
4 tp N - - - ,. - g
....m..
*y.-H** -
g% - :-:2.dk:::- 2 *' " d; . ( ..fby g' TL 'L s j
. h. '
.. 2.e.ia.e_
[- .. i. Ui~
.4 7i M
p. ' 's. ' Y , W -:-2.~ 2 W ] I* ^:
. [ [: x jl4 4g *l-kf+ ~~>>
- d. -
.J. N 7
.s .
. . . m r - - . =:-
, s: lit k % p__ f:
; '- l.g..
. :..._ . i. :.
- 4. . . .
..., jap . ' '[ q
$_ ) .f:?,..l,~
ka ,
.. - ?";.. .
s ~: .'. z m 733m
. c; _.
, ; . ,_ _ __. :- I-: Ei . =
I r e
-',. , t EE.T=:i HE:i ; i:Y , ,. 5f $-
y , El ,: = - - -:EE, t F- - A P
.J . % \ , . E i E i- '
h '{ g ,,, p s e4*w,g= s , .'h y c
- . m.
T4 o
*F V i 3
8 i FIGURE 4. PIIOTOGRAPilS OF VALVE TEST SETUP
[1&# DYNE EN'2tNEERIND CORPORATION r-L (degrees) (in-lbs) (psia) (*F) (1bs/sec) (in2) I Run ' Number PL 2 T a Torque D W A ef f l 1.1 8 -15 63.3 64 28.5 19.3 L 2.1 -9 38.3 60 17.4 19.4 3.1 31 20.2 61 8.60 18.2 4 18 56 61 62.5 27.1 18.6 5 29 38.1 61 16.4 18.4 { 6 60 20.0 66 7.82 16.8 7 28 52 62.2 66 21.5 14.9 ( 8 56 38.3 66 13.2 14.9 9 60 20.2 67 13.2 6.18 h 10 38 65 62.5 70 16.1 11.2 11* 80 38 70 - - l { 11.1 80 38.5 71 9.84 11.1 12 44 18.4 74 3.84 9.07 13 48 58 63.1 71 11.1 7.59 14 70 38.3 72 6.63 7.51 { 15 15.1* 30 20.2 73 2.98 6.41 30 20.1 73 2.87 6.20 { 16* 58 45 63 68 - - 16.l* 37 63.0 67 6.24 4.27 { 16.2 17* 43 30 62.9 38.0 68 6.23 4.27 73 3.69 4.21 17.1 37 37.9 68 3.70 4.21 18.1 17 19.8 68 1.63 3.55 19 68 -18 63.3 69 2.25 1.56 20* -5 63 69 - - 20.1 -5 37.9 70 1.35 2.54 21 -1 19.9 68 .596 1.30 22* 78 -46 62.2 72 .432 .300 22.1 -40 62.9 82 .433 .301 23 -17 38.2 70 .207 .290 24 2 20.0 66 - - extra run, no charge.
. FIGURE 5.
RUN SCHEDULE AND MAJOR TEST RESULTS (Sheet 1 of 2) A-18
he V iMAeE EvituiriOs TEST TARGET (MT-3) 4lr# 4s 4 l.0 E lBA Lu
- yl@ 124 1.l j,5 lilM
.8 l.25 1.4 1.6
=== __
= 6" =
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART 4% 4 +%f>,,$x' c r, ;
$9'bth
~
u ik. ,_s=.-_,- . . _i_ _
TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 'g an na g m gn mm l,l D $=N l.8 1.25 IA 1.6 l
. e., ,
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART g4 4 <$ A
*$ffDh Mk t;$3#
4r . u-r; o e - . .+w =- .~ . .-
[i.4#fDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION I
~
Run (degrees) (in-lbs) (psia) Number 0 Torcue 7 25 38 56 62.7 25.1 56 58 I 25.2 25.3 58 63 54 50
?6 68 46 26.1 74 42 26.2 79 38 26.3 79 38 27 89 35 27.1 89 32 27.2 79 29 27.3 74 26 28 48 52 62.7 28.1 56 58 28.2 58 54 I 28.3 29 62 65 50 46 29.1 G7 42 29.2 68 38 29.3 66 35 30 64 32 30.1 61 29 30.2 52 26 30.3 33 20 I
I FIGURE 5. RUN SCHEDULE AND MAJOR TEST RESULTS \ (Sheet 2 of 2) t I A-19
M M M M M M M M M M M M M MM W
-+ e 2. ;
.l + torque tends to close valve l
t D E 100 N m g , Predicted for incompressible flow ___ ___ Z Torque u,'
/ (Reference 2, Figure 9) :::. O
_ . ,_ g hJ r Compare with A symbols -- Z (in-lbs) _-. ^ - ' '
- /
m m fy
~
; d) ,,'
50
' ,' m
- m. ,.
r
...p.
,_ j,, _
~ ~
A t j g 9 7 4 4,. -~ O G.~~ 3 . .. _- _ O
~'
p ll O ~ --
-'+----n, -_l!- O
-t--
Q___ __.M___ 7 :S ___ _ __.. __ .__ y__.
-, ;g
..___..___..__. ____._.. I y
____ 4
-50 '
symbol pt 2 (psia) u o Z O 62.7
.._---_. ~'~~~ -----
38 t--- > . .g _.-._.___ O i
-9_ .
20 - e .. . _._ _.__
; ~~~_q_.~ .._ . .__ . - ._._ ..___ _.___ _
- ~~~~
-100 II' T ~ ~ ~~~'~ ~~--~ --~ ~
C- C 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 . a (degrees) ' FIGURE 6. TOROUE VERSUS VALVE ANGLE
[1&f0YNE EN'2iNEERIN'2 CORP 2 RATION 1 [ 100 ti i i ,i ki u l lll r, . ii IP ICI i .i [ ip up i j! Ik JN 3I ll V i 50 l [. . w Torque l (in-lbs) i i
! i !
l! . ! II i 0 'i > - 1 I a = 38' I
--~--
Sysh;ol Run 1;o. ! O lo ll I
-50 11 1 . ..
_ 7_. _____ d 12 i
# 25 - 27 ii l _____, ,
I l ,fi . j
'i1 li i.l i'
' i 3
- .;_..1 1
[ j , i_
-100 I ~- M;
^
i i . . 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7C Pt2 (psia) 100 ;_ _. 4,,. . i . . i ,,
, Q~I . _.- H _._ ,,. jj
...} g,_.4 ._y ;; j'
!,;j _.
_._-; i..L l. 4 _ _.__. 4,., a- . -4 > y .j-_. .-_- 4,4 . _. .. -- _.- - . . . . , -. -.. _ lI! I '
'-I ' i- !! ' '
llIY j,_ ._A;LZ36-3 i I . _1~ L l ; j
- a np 50 ! ,I d ' ,
I . Ti Torque . _ .._ l1 i (in-lbs) { 0 1 1 a = 48' Symbol Run No. I O 13 I 14
-50 ;
i d 15 l e 28 - 30 l i
-100 l l 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Pt 2 (psia)
FIGURE 7. TORQUE VERSUS TOTAL PRESSURE A-21
!ll1 1 1
$e% ,
n mZgZ,m2Zc ) gO3 OgMH y OZ N 2 - 0
) 9 a
W . i
. s
- p
( 7
. 2 8 0 6 3 2
- 2
-t W -P 0
8
- l
- o g W .,
- bQ
=
- S p
y d ' s .w. N s 0
)
,( e['!
I y 7
~
M % T s s s
" E
(' ' g L
^ %
- G N h 0 N M )
s s 6 A
- li" E
,1I (s li" K N m ' V s N - L s s s A M T
.T '
V T 's S m s s % 0 U s s % 5 ) S R M l E (
>U
.L s
e E N a e V s .iiN - r x x - g E s t - e T M \ x N
^ '
d ( A R x m 0
% 4 a W
, O
-i as L M
;b T - s F x
s .x s N ' s M
\
\ s s
N 0 8 E Td i- h 3 R U
/\ i- /
G N M s s N , s m' I F s s s -
\ '
s s M ' s s ' 0 2 5, ,u
.n rt
~ _
s ~ M * - M n ,i 0 1 r't "" M 0 0 M 0 3 2 ) c 0 1 O e s w/ loN m M ( b 1
i 1 1l )l jil1jI\t h=%DEg m,F=Oymm2EO Oo2Io2> DOZ d _ h:::: : 0 9
) , lnI iI a ,lni
, i s ln t tII1i
, p 7
_ , ( 2 80
, 2 6 32 ,!ni
,t
,P 0 8
=
b
. , l o lm'
, b
, m y
OOA -
, s 6'_ 0 7 E
_ ,!Ii
-}h_
,r L
G
%' % N _
_ _ .'% A l
,s 5%' E
_ 1 ' V L y h,A 0 A _
./'
6 V _ _k' S -
' sN U s S _
- s s R E
N V _ 3' ' s 0 ) A s - 5 s E Oa A e R e A r x g W x e O N . d L s ( F s' ' j'
' ' 0 a E s s 4 V _
)
\
c- s
/
I T _ C _ E -
*-, x F -
s s F _ E _ 0 _ N N 3
,,s j: n 9 s
h s N E R
\ -
U
\ s G x '
I s x 0 F
% 2 a
ou~l a'A
- w 0
~ 1 r
m' t _
~ .
0 _ 0 0 0 0 3 2 f) 1 f2 - en A i( >L* _
l r,1u,DVWE EN@lNEERING CORPORATION [ arPerPnn nrFrg. APR1B WO M st Procedure for Job 1240 ( J Lb QD Lb u U Lb b
- 1. Valve disc angle, o, was set by lab mechanic and; double-checked by test engineer at each point.
All valve pressures were run at this setting of a before a was changed.
- 2. The barometric pressure was measured (Hass mercury barometer) before each run and was used in the data reduction.
[
- 3. Before each test, the cameras on the P and Pt2 pressure tl gauges were checked and cocked.
- 4. Pre-run outputs of electronic instrumentation were recorded using the digital data system.
- 5. At the direction of the test engineer, airflow was started by a mechanic opening a manual control valve.
( The total pressure at the test valve was the independent variable' monitored by the valve operator. The control pressure was observed using a 0-200 psi Heise differential pressure gauge.
- 6. When steady flow was established, all data were simultaneously recorded (torquemeter and thermocouples on data system t pressure gauges and manometer photos on Polaroid film).
Flow was then shut down.
- 7. Post-run outputs were recorded.
[ A-24 p
[18pfDYNE EN31NEERING CORP 3 RATION ( 8. All results and inputs were double-checked for transcription accuracy or any electronic anomalies.
'9 a . For run numbers 1-24, one set of data per blow wis taken.
t 9b. For run numbers 25-30, only the torquemeter output was recorded. The output was recorded at 3-4 psi intervals of Pt2 All ther procedures were as de.;cribed above. I E [ [ F~ - i L b L A-25 65 E t
3/19/CO DR1240A " PAGE 1 [' PROGRAM LISTING 70 REM DR1240A DATA REDUCTION PROGRAM - ISOLATION VALVE TEST
, 80 REM 2/25/B0 - G.F.
95 SELECT PRINT 215(80) [ :S=0 - 100 READ D1.A1,N9,DS 110 READ N.B.P1,P2,II.P4.PS,P6,P7,PB,P9.T1.T2,HO,V1 120 B=Be.49115 12f PRINT HEX ( OAOAOA) - 122 IF S>O THEk F27 123 PRINT HEX ( Ob)," FLUIDYNE ENCINEERING CORPORATI DN" 124 PRINT HEX ( OA) ' 125 PRINT TAB ( 24)3" PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TELTS" - 126 PRINT HEX ( OAOA) 127 PRINTUSING 551 ,P1,P2,11 P4,P5,P6,P7,PB,P9 128 PRINT HEX ( OA) [ 130 P1=P1+B 1CO P2=P2+B 150 P4=(I1-P4)*.489+B ( 160 PS=(11-P5)*.489+B 170 P6=(Il-P6)*.489+B 171 P7=(I1-P7)*.489+B 172 PB=(11-PS)*.489+B [ 173 P9=(11-P9)*.489+B 175 Z=459.69 1CO T1=T1+Z 190 T2=T2+Z 200 R1=.11486E8*Pl*Di*(.8333*T1+198.6)/T1^2 210 C1=1 .184*Ri^( .2) 220 K1=.53160+(P1+16.9)*(1.581 .OOB34*(T1-520))*10E-6 230 W1=K1*C1*A1*P1/SGR( T1) 250 T1=T1-2 260 T2=T2-Z [ 320 PRINT TAB ( 8);"DATE "i DS 330 PRINT HEX ( OA) 340 PRINTUSING 450 .N h 350 PRINTUSING 460 , V1 360 PRINTUSING 470 370 PRINTUSING 480 , W1,100 380 PRINTUSING 490 ,P4,P5,P6 385 PRINTUSING 500 ,P7,P8,P9 390 PRINT HEX ( OA) 400 PRINTUSING 510 ,B 410 PRINTUSING 520 ,P1,P2
<20 PRINTUSING 530 , T1, T2 C30 PRINTUSING 540 , I 1, A 1 440 PRINTUSIN6 550 ,K1,C1,R1*1E-06 C50 % RUN NUMBER ###.##
C60 % VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= -##.# [ 470 % CCO % (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= -##.### TORGUE(IN-LBS)= -# A-26 7 - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . css
3/19/CO DR1240A PAGE 2 PROGRAM LISTING 090 % P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= -###.e# -###.## -###.## 500 % P7,PS.P9(PSIA)= -###.## -###.## -###.## [ 510 % 520 % BAROMETER (PSIA)= PT1(PSIA)=
-###.e# PT2(PSIA)= -##
TT1(DEC.F)= TT2(DEG.Fl= -## { 530 % 540 % 11(INCHES OF HC.)= ##.## i41(SQ.IN.)= ##. f ### L 580*% K1,C1,R1= -#.##### -#.##### -##,##### 551 % INPUTS -###.## -###.## ##.## ##.## ##.## ##.## ## ## ##. ## #
- e. ##
{ 560 B=S+1
- IF S < 3 THEN 570
~
- PRINT HEX ( OC)
- S=0
- 570 IF N9 = N THEN 600
- GOTO 110 600 END 3/19/80 DR1240A LINE NUMBER CROSS REFERENCE 0110 - 0570 0127 - 0122 0450 - 0340 0460 - 0350
~ 0470 - 0360 ~ 0480 - 0370 { 0490 - 0380 0500 - 0385 0510 - 0400 0520 - 0410 0530 - 0420 0540 - 0430 0550 - 0440 r-1 0551 - 0127 0570 - 0560 F . .. . ._. . _Y b _
3/19/80 , DR1240A VARIABLE CROSS REFERENCE 0121 0124 0128 0330 0390 (A A() - 0460 AO - 0121 0126 { ' A1 . ' ' - 0100 0230 0430 , A1()" - 0540 B - 0110 0120 0120 013C.;O140 0150 0160 0170 0171 0172 0173 0400 [ C - 0480 0560 C1 - 0210 0230 0440 0550 D3 - 0100 0320 [ D1 - 0100 0200 E - 0220 0440 [ EB - 0200 F - 0530 0530 , G - 0470 0530 0530 HO - 0110 0370 11 - 0110 0127 0150 0160 0170 0171 0172 0173 0430 [ I1() - 0540 K1 - 0220 0230 0440 0550 { N - 0110 0340 0460 0570 [ N9 - 0100 0570 P1 - 0110 0127 0130 0130 0200 0220 0230 0410 [ P2 - 0110 0127 0140 0140 0410 I P4 - 0110 0127 0150 0150 0380 0490 PS - 0110 0127 0160 0160 0380 0490 , P6 - 0110 0127 0170 0170 0380 P6() - 0490 L c L A-28
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- I
L 3/19/80 DR1240A VARIABLE CROSS REFERENCE
- P7 - 0110 0127 0171 0171 0385 0500
[PJ - 0110 0127 0172 0172 0385 0500 ,
- 0110 0127 0173 0173 0385
{P9 P9() - 0500 (R '
- 0450 R() - 0510 R1 - 0200 0210 0440 0550 "S - 0095 0122 0460 0480 0480 0560 0560 0560 0560 T1 - 0110 0180 0100 0200 0200 0220 0230 0250 0250 0420
[T2 - 0110 0190 0190 0260 0260 0420 V1 - 0110 0350 W1 - 0230 0370 2 - 0175 0100 0190 0250 0260 (
~
[ [ [ [ [ A-29 c I ns
[ FLVIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 236.00 49.20 85.00 57.10 53.60 51.30 52.40 53.20 49.80 D4TE 3-14-80 . g RUN NUMBER 1.10 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= g (ZERO L; - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 28.453 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= -15.0 L P4,P5 P6(PSIA)= 27.77 29.48 30.60 P7,PS.P9(PSIA)= 30.06 29.67 31.33 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.126 PT1(PSIA)= 250.12 PT2(PSIA)= 63.32 TTi(DEG.FT 66.75 TT2(DEC.F)= 63.83 I1(INCHES '.T HC.)= 85.00 A1(SG.IN.)= ,4.905 { K1 C1 R1= 0.53567 0.99337 16.50934>ra INPUTS 138.20 24.20 84.80 78.95 76.80 75.30 76.05 76.66 74.50 LATE 3-14-80 [ RUN NUMBER 2.10 F VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= f L (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 17.366 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= - 8. 9 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 16.98 18.03 18.77 h P7,PB,P9(PSIA)= 18.40 18.10 19.16 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.126 { PT1(PSIA)= TT1(DEG.F)= 152.32 60.96 PT2(PSIA)= TT2(DEG.F)= 38.32 60.37 11(INCHES OF HC.)= 84.80 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 K1,C1,R1= 0.53426 0.99270 10.20120 INPUTS 61.50 6.10 84.80 84.60 83.65 83.40 84.40 83.60 83.35 i DATE 3-14-80 E RUN NUMBER 3.10 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= f (ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLDW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 8.604 TORQUE (IN-LBS)= +31.3 P4 PS P6(PSIA)= 14.22 14.68 14.81 P7,PS.P9(PSIA)= 14.32 14.71 14.83
~
BARDMETER (PSIA)= 14.126 ~ PT1(PSIA)= 75.62 PT2(PSIA)= 20.22 TTi(DEC.F)= 59.65 TT2(DEG.F)= 60.53 ^ 11(INCHES OF HO.)=^ 84.80 A1(SO.IN.)= 4.905 K1 C1,R1= 0.53306 0.99161 5.08146 E
^-3
/Eds
I f FLVIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 222.80 48.40 85.00 60.15 54.90 52.40 54.00 55.90 53.40 DATE 3-14-80 6 . RUN NUMBER 4.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= 18 (ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 27.091 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +56.4 P4,P5.P6(PSIA)= 26.28 28.85 30.07 P7,PB P9(PSIA)= 29.29 28.36 29.58
~
BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.132 PTi(PSIA)= 236.93 PT2(PSIA)= 62.53
] TTi(DEC.F)=
I1(INCHES OF HQ.)= K1 C1,R1= 61.16 85.00 0.53559 TT2(DEC.F)= A1(SG.IN.)= 0.99332 15.85915 61.43 4.905 F INPUTS 129.60 24.00 84.85 80.40 77.20 75.60 76.85 77.95 76.25 DATE 3-14-80 I l RUN NUMBER (ZERO DEG. - 5.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) lS l FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 16.351 TORGUECIN-LBS)= +29.3 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 16.30 17.87 18.65 P7,PB P9(PSIA)= 18.04 17.50 18.33 l BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.132 PT1(PSIA)= 143.73 PT2(PSIA)= 38.13 I TTi(DEG.F)= 62.84 TT2(DEG.F)= 61.40 I 11(INCHES OF HG.)= 84.85 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 K1,C1,R1= 0.53410 0.99261 9.58016 1 i
)
I l INPUTS 55.10 5.90 84.80 84.70 84.30 83.90 84.25 94.15 83.80 l DATE 3-14-80 RUN NUMBER 6.00 I l VALVE PDG4:!ON - ALPHA'LEGREES)= (ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS 13ULLY OPEN) FLDW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 7.819 (8 TORQUE (IN-LBS)= +59.9 I P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 14.18 14.38 14.57 P7,PS,P9(PSIA)= 14.40 14.45 14.62 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.138 l PTi(PSIA)= 69.23 PT2(PSIA)= 20.03 ; TT1(DF.3.F)= 66.84 TT2(DEG.F)= 66.12 i I 11(INCHES OF HQ.)= 84.80 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 K1 C1 R1= 0.53291 0.99143 4.56899 ,gj l A-31 7y g
FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 175.50 48.10,84.90 71.90 68.10 65.80 70.60 69.70 66.60 BA.TE 3-14-80 g . i RUN NUMBER 7.00 l VALVE PDSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 26 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 21.477 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +51.9 l P4,P5,P6(PSIA >= 20.49 22.35 23.47 P7,PB,P9(PSIA)= 21.13 21.57 23.08 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.138 PT1(PSIA)= 189.63 PT2(PSIA)= 62.23 TTi(DEG.F)= 69.12 TT2(DEC.F)= 66.29 I1(INCHES OF HQ.)= 84.90 A1(CG.IN.)= 4.905 l K1,C1,R1= 0.53471 0.99298 12.44338 I l INPUTS 102.70 24.15 84.80 85.90 82.45 81.70 84.55 83.40 82.00 I DATE 3-14-80 i 1 RUN NUMBER 3.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= 28 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) I FLOW RATE (LES/SEC)= P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= P7,PB,P9(PSIA)= 13.213 13.60 14.26 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= 15.28 14.82 15.65 15.50
+55.6 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.138
)
PT1(PSIA)= 116.83 PT2(PSIA)= 38.28 < TT1(DEG.F)= 67.71 TT2(DEG.F)= 66.26 l I I1(INCHES OF HG.)= K1,C1,R1= 84.80 0.53363 0.99228 A1(SG.IN.)= 7.69340 4.905 , I l I INPUTS 40.70 6.10 84.80 85.35 84.90 84.35 BS.50 84.40 84.40 DATE 3-14-80 RUN NUMBER 9.00 VALVE POSITIDN - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 28 (ZERO DEQ. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 6.182 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +59.5 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.86 14.08 14.35 ,I P7,P8,P9(PSIA)= 13.79 14.33 14.33 I BAROMETER (PSIA)= PTi(PSIA)= TTi(DEQ.F)= 14.138 54.83 67.82 PT2(PSIA)= TT2(DEO.F)= 20.23 67.13 I1(INCHES DF HQ.)= S4.80 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 K1,C1,R1= 0.53268 0.99101 3.60994 A-32
.h;&
. .. - 2 ..
[ FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 128.70 48.20 71.70 87.30 72.60 71.65 78.20 79.40 77.70 DpTE 3-14-80 ; F- g RUN NUMBER 10.00 L VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 38 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 16.126 TORGUE(IN-LBF*.= +64.6 ( P4 P5,P6(PSIA)= P7,P8,P9(PSIA)= 6.63 13.72 14.28 11.08 10.49 11.32 { BAROMETER (PSIA)= PT1(PSIA)= 14.263 142.96 PT2(PSIA)= 62.46 TT1(DEQ.F)= 71.48 TT2(DEQ.F)= 70.23 11(INCHES OF HC.)= [ K1,C1.R1= 71.70 0.53397 0.99257 A1(SG.IN.)= 9.32619 4.905 INPUTS 73.10 24.20 73.15 75.15 71.20 69.90 76.45 72.00 70.85 DATE { 3-14-80 RUN NUMBER 11.10 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 3s [ (2ERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 9.842 TORQUE (IN-LBS)= +80.1 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.28 15.21 15.85 ( P7,PB.P9(PSIA)= 12.65 14.82 15.38 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.263 { PT1(PSIA)= TT1(DEG.F)= 87.36 70.33 PT2(PSIA)= TT2(DEG.F)= 38.46 70 60 l 11(INCHES OF HQ.)= 73.15 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 l K1,C1,R1= 0.53316 0.99180 5.71535 l [ INPUTS 20.10 4.10 73.05 73.90 73.35 72.95 74.05 73.20 73 00 DATE 3-14-80 RUN NUMBER 12.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 36 r (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) L FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 3.835 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +43.6 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.84 14.11 14.31 P7,PS.P9(PSIA)= 13.77 18.19 14.28 7 L BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.263 I PT1(PSIA)= 34.36 PTC SIA)= 18.36 E TT1(DEO.F)= 76.93 TT2(DEQ.F)= 74.10 I L 11(INCHES OF HQ.)= 73.05 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 K1,C1,R1= 0.53233 0.99009 2.21197 f _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ . A-33 [,;, g4 6 OJ
[ FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 84.00 48.80 67.00 77.60 66.00 62.70 75.65 68.55 65.00 DATE 3-14-80 ' s c RUN NUMBER 13.00 [ t'/.LVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 48 (ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 11.064 TORGUE(IN-LBS>= +57.9 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= { P7,PS.p9(PSIA)= 9.08 10.03 14.75 13.50 16.36 15.24 L BAROMETER (PSIA >= PYi(PSIA)= 14.265 98.26 PT2(PSIA)= 63.06 TT1(SEC.F)= 71.46 TT2(DEG.F)= 71.22 11(INCHES OF HG.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 ( K1,C1,R1= 0.53331 O.99199 6.41065 INPUTS 44.80 24.00 67.00 69.00 67.00 65.85 71.90 66.40 66.25 DATE 3-14-80 RUN NUMBER 14.00 V/ VE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= 46 ( (2cRO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 6.630 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +69.6 P4.P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.28 14.26 14.82 P7,PS,P9(PSIA)= 11.86 { 14.55 14.63 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.265 ( PT1(PSIA)= 59.06 PT2(PSIA)= 38.26 L' TT1(DEG.F)= 72 *2 TT2(DEO F)= 72.19 11(INCHES OF HG.)= 67.00 A1 (SG. ,71 := 4.905 K1,C1,R1= 0.53272 O.99113 3.G4328 { INPUTS 12.40 5.90 67.00 68.40 67.75 67.05 69.20 67.25 67.10 DATE 3-14-80 RUN NUMBER 15.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= gg (ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) ' FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 2.978 TORQUE (IN-LBS)= +30.1 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.58 13.89 14.24 P7,P8,P9(PSIA)=' 13.19 14.14 14.21 I' L BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.265 PTi(PSIA)= 26.66 PT2(PSIA)= 20.16 r TTi(DEO.F)= 75.42 TT2(DEC.F)= 73.44 L 11(INCHES OF HQ.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 4.905 X1.C1 R1= 0.53223 0.98958 1.72279 A-34 .![q l 5
FLVIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 11,40 5.80 67.00 68.40 67.70 67.05 69.15 67.30 67.05 DATE 3-14-80 s -
- i. '
RUN NUMBER 15.10 i VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 48 I (ZERO DEC. VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 2.868 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +29.80 P4 P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.58 13.92 14.24 P7,PB,P9(PSIA)= 13.21 14.11 14.24 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.265 4 PT1(PSIA)= 25.66 PT2(PSIA)= 20.06 j I TTi(DEG.F)= 11(INCHES OF HQ.)= K1,C1,R1= 74.39 67.00 0.53222 O.98951 TT2(DEG.F)= A1(SG.IN.)= 1.66237 73.16 4.905 i i I I I I I I I
- I A-35 l fj
//
Y
I FLUIDYNE ENGINEEPING CORPOPATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS i NPUTS 321.00 48.70 67.00 69.60 69.10 67.20 74.10 69.60 65.90 DATE 3-21-80 -
~
.' RUN NUMBER 16.10 g VALVE POSITION - ALPHA < DEGREES)= 68 (2ERO DEG - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN).
FLOW PATE <LBS/SEC)= 6.243 TOPQUE(IN-LBS)= +36.80 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 12.99 13. 23 14.16 P7,P8,P9(PSIR)= 10.79 12.99 14.80 BAROMETEP (PSIR)= 14.26_ PT1(PSIA)= 335.26 PT2(PSIA)= 62.96 TTi(DEG.F)= 68.09 TT2(DEG.F)= 66 71 l 11(INCHES OF HG.>= 67.00 R1(SO.IN.>= 0. 802
- E K1,C1,R1= 0.53693 0.99250 8.92263 1
1 4 l 1 l l I i l A-36
/./
..}k @*
v
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~
" FLVIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION i PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TE*TS o
)
INPUTS 321.00 48.60 67.00 69.60 69.20 67.30 74.10 69.80 65.95 1 DATE 3-17-80 l
?
RUN NUMBER 16.20 l 4 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 58 I l (ZERO DEO. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= P4,PS,P6(PSIA >= 6.228 12.99 TORQUE (IN-LBS)= 13.18 14.11
+42.8 l P7,PS,P9(PSIA)= 10.79 12.89 14.77 ,
l l BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.263 PT1(PSIA)= 335.26 PT2(PSIA)= 62.86 TTi(DEC.F)= 70.52 YT2(DEG.F)= 68.23 11(INCHES OF HQ.)= 67.00 A1(SO.IN.)= 0.802 K1,C1,R1= 0.53686 O.99249 8.86908 } I 1 INPUTS 135.70 23.60 67.00 68.90 69.20 68.00 70.80 68.15 67.55 5 DATE 3-17-80 RUN NUMBER 17.10 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= 68 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 3.695 TORQUE (IN-LBS)= +37.0 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= I P7,PB,P9(PSIA)= 13.33 12.40 13.18 13.70 13.77 13.99 BARDMETER (PSIA)= 14.263 I PT1(PSIA)= 199.96 PT2(PSIA)= 37.86 TTi(DEC.F)= 71.03 TT2(DEG.F)= 67.98 11(INCHES OF HG.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.802 K1.C1 R1= 0.53483 0.99167 5.28319 I INPUTS 74.20 5.50 67.00 67.80 67.80 67.30 69.30 67.50 67.15 DATE 3-17-80 l RUN NUMBER 18.10 E VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 66 m (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) l FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 1.627 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +16.6 P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.87 13.87 14.11 P7,P8.P9(PSIA)= 13.13 14.01 14.19 BAROMETER (PSIA >= 14.263 i I PT1(PSIA)= TT1(DEG.F)= 11(INCHES OF HQ.)= 88.46 70.87 67.00 PT2(PSIA)= TT2(DEG.F)= A1(SG.IN.)= 19.76 67.91 0,802 K1,C1,R1= 0.53317 O.99020 2.33820 gj, - ' A-37 g6
[ FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 12,40 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 186.00 23.70 67.00 68.90 69.30 68.00 70.80 60.20 67.55 yTE 3-21-80 ; F-g RUN NUMBER 17.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 56 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 3.685 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +30.10 [ P4.P5.P6(PSIA)= 13.33 ~13.13 13.77 P7.P8.P9(PSIA)= 12.40 13.67 13.9o BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.263 PT1(PSIA)= 200.26 PT2(PSIA)= 37.96 TT1(DEG.F)= 75.42 TT2(DEG.F)= 73.44 11(INCHES OF HC.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0. 802 { K1,C1.R1= 0.53475 0.99166 5.23437 [ [ [ [ . [ r A-38 f.. .' F
, \7 g 65
FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS l INPUTS 109.90 49.00 67.00 68.60 68.05 67.90 70.75 68.25 67.40 SATE 3-17-80 , = 4 RUN NUMBER 19.00 l VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= 66 I l (ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLDW RATE (LBS/SEC)= P4 P5,P6(PSIA)= 13.48 2.293 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= 13.75 13.82
-18.1 P7,P8,P9(PSIA)= 12.43 13.65 14.06 BARDMETER (PSIA)= 14.265 PTi(PSIA)= 124.16 PT2(PSIA)= 63.26 TT1(DEG.F)= 68.82 TT2(DEC.F)= 68.60 I
11(INCHES OF HC.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.802 K1,C1,R1= 0.53373 0.99085 3.29852 INPUTS 59.10 23.60 67.00 67.40 67.65 67.30 68.60 67.70 67.00 DATE 3-17-80 RUN NJ.lBER 20.10 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 68 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) I FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= P4.P5,P6(PSIA)= P7,PB.P9(PSIA)= 14.06 13.48 1.350 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= 13.94 13.92 14.11 14.26
-5.4 BARDMETER (PSIA)= 14.265 PT1(PSIA)= 73.36 PT2(PSIA)= 37.86 TT1(DEC.F)= 69.93 TT2(DEC.F)= 69.69 I1(INCHES OF HJ.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.802 I K1,C1,R1= 0.53295 0.98983 1.94364 I INPUTS 18.60 5.60 67.00 67.20 67.25 67.20 67.45 67.30 67.20 DATE 3-17-80 RUN NUMBER 21.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 48 l
(ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLDW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 0.514 TORQUE (IN-LBS)= -1.3 I P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= P7,P8,P9(PSIA)= 14.16 14.04 14.14 14.11 14.16 14.16 - BARDMETER (PSIA)= 14.265 PT1(PSIA)= 32.86 PT2(PSIA)= 19.86 TT1(DEG.F)= 68.67 TT2(DEC.F)= 67.76
.!?(INCHES OF H0.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.802 I K1 C1,R1= 0.53235 0.98807 A-39 0.87341
/
[o <>/.r f
FASMhWK CNCINEERIN3 GORPCRAYl"$N [ n. co.c /248 sues, an. / cr
., N4 .,,,.1A*/r:
a ...,.e, % A- D M - b wi~ & . . . . . , . ,. m I ist. , Ca 4,_ k , P2, @l$), f )< f/9 ~ A '>
"V4, ? . 529; Elanu m y7 I
8,' 1r N<. 695 =? /f" .19 9 Y' ' / D// m m 4 Ys .999 . l -
.: 1E :/%, ,\ (~ TB 9] s( 403 )
y 88 9) ' . S M (&L) E - i m l I l t I j E i i E I l l l I I i i ! I I i j I l t l l E = I l I E - i b I ! A-40 g , c , e- ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L_1_
I FLUIDYNE ENQlNEERING CORPORATION I PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS INPUTS 82.20 48.00 67.00 67.30 67.20 67.05 67.50 67.25 67.10 J) ATE 3-17-80 I RUN NUMBER 22.00 g VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 78 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 0.432 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= -46.2 P4.P5.P6(PSIA)= 14.08 14.13 14.20 P7,PB,P9(PSIA)= 13.98 14.10 14.18 BAROMETEft (PSIA)= 14.231 PT1(PSIA)= 96.43- PT2(PSIA)= 62.23 TT1(DEG.F)= 69.64 TT2(DEG.F)= 71.75 11(INCHES OF HG.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.195 K1,C1,R1= 0.53330 0.98891 1.26183 INPUTS 43.40 24.00 67.00 67.00 67.10 67.10 67.20 67.15 67.05 DATE 3-17-80 RUN NUMBER 23.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 76 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 0.257 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= -16.9 P4 P5,P6(PSIA)= 14.23 14.18 14.18 P7,PB,P9(PSIA)= 14.13 14.15 14.20 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.231 PTi(PSIA)= 57.63 PT2(PSIA)= 38.23 TTi(DEG.F)= 68.62 TT2(DEG.F)= 69.70 i I1(INCHES OF HO.)= K1 C1,R1= 67.00 0.53272 0.98772 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.75603 0.195 1 INPUTS 5.20 5.80 67.00 67.00 67.00 67.00 67.05 67.00 67.00 DATE 3-17-80 RUN NUMBER 24.00 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DEGREES)= 76 1 (ZERO DEC. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) FLOW RATE (LBS/SEC)= =fk=0SF TORGUE(IN-LBS)= +1.5
'P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 14.23 14.23 14.23 P7,PS,P9(PSIA)= 14.20 14.23 14.23 ,
h BAROMETER (PSIA >= 14.231 9 PT1(PSIA)= -!? 00 PT2(PSIA)= 20.03 TTi(DEC.F)= 77.40 TT2(DEG.F)= 65.50 I1(INCHES OF HG.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.195 l K1.C1 R1= 0.53212 A-41 0.98467 0.24946 740
[ f FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT 1240 - VALVE TESTS { p INPUTS 82.60 48.70 67.00 67.30 67.20 67.05 67.50 67 25 67.10
- 3-17-80
.DATE ,
4 RUN NUMBER ( g 22.10 VALVE POSITION - ALPHA (DECREES)= 76 (ZERO DEG. - VALVE IS FULLY OPEN) r FLDW RATE (LBS/SEC)= 0.433 TORGUE(IN-LBS)= -40.4 L P4,P5,P6(PSIA)= 14.08 14.13 14.20 P7,PS P9(PSIA)= 13.98 14.10 14.18 BAROMETER (PSIA)= 14.231 PT1(PSIA)= 96.83 PT2(PSIA)= 62.93 TT1(DEG.F)= 70.84 TT2(DEG.F)= 82.09 11(INCHES OF HC.)= 67.00 A1(SG.IN.)= 0.195 K1.C1,R1= 0.53329 0.98892 1.26331 l [ [ f f r L L A-42 l ~ f'
[A47#bMK EN31NEERIN3 CCRPORATION JOB CODE _!E O SHEETMO. Or b BY DATE */ > 0 , COMP 0 MENT REF. DRWG. l CMM.D.SY DATE-l suuser nE v. s v DATE Awx~d A M b, d "L cd :" Lw_+ l {' - A41hast_S :
/a disib!B- f/
\ br> /i/L $,_ ._Zef1 & p w - g _ L M /c. (,,/qb ) -4re -
%2/p p I- "-d' L , 7 L Lfn 1 n.4, Q
l d' & AL/ m I wh })I .
~
/
. o o _o_ . i
__ p
,. . o n- Co 4
l l zo o L* , ? _ _ L _.0 i i _._ _. ._ # i *# i __. y -~ l I i v. I.,ari Vo ! i l I !
' I I.-t r )
r, ! . ,a j
, , z(I. I
, q I
I [i ; to ; . ,.7 j _/A ! - i i i Ll I 7, l . ., v l 9 I I I I i I e. . . . . z. r! l l L i i f, , o I . I 1 I A-43 I
FESF#NNK GNOINEERIN2 C3RPORAT13N me CooE SWEET wo.
- or b SV DATE COMPONENT REF. D RWG.
CwK.D. SV DATE SUS,TCT REY.BY DATE e [#L.
~
e 4 Ar/t 4 / W f Y* l- lSlL ht2- 4L)MA w ' '
~
- c. yank.$hf /kr7;44s.
l )= 2A = Y.>=/,Yo7 a= .r Me . . ,ri v v/t - . 7sor as [ # Ek v= ns A /a .
\
*e _. .aN 'A i /u \ . .ist
& /$ '
, l ,
lP;97) \ : : T-- < i i a .! . , 4 4
' / J" ' : _
i l ! ! i l i
!, T= [Tl Vls I N s
o l \ i
- i 6
j i l ,,, . g,
,t) ik (& ('{$f x
$ n-Q d,t/ f.($ (?y
(
..- l r rL g?
cr' .2114/f') vVtL t v'IMu ~ l j':ca.cnp/) 6 ~ r -r . c, . .w ns'at n- n co e ? p
~
t sz.<w l-l T5 A-44
[L&tOYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
.r
, O .1x)es pai PRESSURE GAGE RECORD g
MANUTACTURER NCCjd F S SERIAL NUMBER 7/o N Calibration #2 [ Calibration #1M ll/s [5d'I/'e Performed By: f //ST.I!7} Performed By: 57 0 . M40 Dats: - 7'D ?- ?! Date: tl =70l EO Room Tayip. At Test Room Temp. At Test De d Weight Gage Reading Dead Weight Gage Reading Pres s ure increa sino Deeressino Pre s s ure Increa sino Decrea s ino o o o a O O D 3o 3 o.O G So . o '7 4 7(j f 9. 9i ,2 9. To ho too s c (oo oG -es 60 S o. 0 0 Co.o O go 40.00 9o.o7 ..g 90 90.o0 19. ft ilo 120 00 I ? o .co o /d o // 9. 9 *' /Jo .co sSo s So oS t so.o S .a c. /So / S'O, Oo /s*0.00 iho tso.co tao.o1 on fyo /%0.00 160.0i Zio tao.o- Za o.os JJ p/o 409.90 p o 9.9 5 Leo 240.63 240.l0 es avo J +'o. c o p'/O.c o 2 70 Zio.co 2.70.o8 .o t ,p V o p (,9. 9 o #59.90 Soo 299.oS 300 # 9 *~'
- Colibr: tion #3 Calibration #4 P,;rformsd By: Performed By:
Deta: Date: lbom T:mp. At Test Room Temp. At Test [ De:d W:1ght Gage Reading Dead Weight Gage Reading _ Preneure Increa sine Decrea sine Pres sure Increa sine Decrea sine Us2 Record: Det3 Date Date Date Job No. Icb No. Job No. ,,, Job No. Enpr. Engr. Digt. Engr.
- Date Date Date Date Job No. Job No. Job No. Job No.
Eng.. Engr. Engr. Dsgr. DIRECTIONS FOR PERTORMING CALIBRATIONS L 2.
- 1. Place gage in a room with controlled temperature one hour before calibrating.
Set the pressure to full scale of the gage. 'fh /
- 3. Close the supply valve and let the system set for one (1) minute. 'If the pressure has dropped 0.1% of full scale, check for, amif.1x all . leaks.
F 4. Dcercise the gage through 4 cycles from aero to full scale before performing the calibration. (Be carJul not to surge L the gage with rapid pressure changes).
- 5. Starting at zero pressure', take readings (pictures) at each designated pressure point. Take each succeeding read-ing on increasing pressure until full scale is reached. Then take each succeeding Isading on decreasing pressure >
~ until aero is reached. (Note: Do not allow the pressure to very more than 10% of full scale while changing the weights on the dead weight tester.) A-45 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[Auf 0YNE ENGINEERING CORPOR ATION PRESSURE GAGE RECORD 2 MANUTACTURER E/.I[ SERIAL NUMBER If Calibr: tion el Calibration #2 J Performy By: [dT8[ Performed By: 8eM48M f Dato: $~ lY~~76 f/OfC] Date: $" E S ** ? ) Room Temp. At Test Room Temp. At Test Deid Weight Gage Reading Dead Weight Gage Reading Pres sure Increa sino Decrea sino Pres s ure Increa sino Decrea sino 8 0 Y* W G $ O Je }$. D ofd.D 20 Zo . 6 D u os" VO Yd. B YO. o W VO .0 4/e.o r As As.2 dd.o 6o c e.o 9.o.c 20 >Tf.n 26.e to go.e 80.e l /s/
/Js Jso.o JJs.o
/60,o
;//s.o
/so iso m .o iss.o m.o r no .o sys lys.o /39.fr No /Mo.o / te.o sd6 N Oe0 /bd. O /(e0 &*o /d$. /
$ /fl*O N$ 0 /So /[0e O /$$ /f
/$$ }$0 0 UD 340 O 1 Cellbrttion #3 Calibration #4 PJrf:rmed By: 70 dd'. do Performed By: __
g Data: ?/ 7 ~7 MO Da'e: 3 Aoom Tcmp. At Test Room Temp. At Test Derd weight Gage Reading Dead Weight Gage Reading Preneure fneres sino i Decre a s *4e Pres s ure Increa sine Decreasin r O 3 O _ rc 26 7 70 0.5 _ 43 AC 0 40 0 m C0 o Go. /]S
>' 1 PD 0 70 }
e.3 /no o te$ 0 l Co
/43
/.20 0
/40 0 f.20. 0
/40 0 g /40 /6 C. O /610S g /f) /6'O. O /Pd a Us hbrd:
Data Date Date Date 1jobNo._ Job No. Job No. Job No. Engr. Engr. Engr. Ligr. Date Date Date Date job No. Job No. Job No. Job No. Ih Tagr. Engr. Engr. .1gr. DIRECTIONS FOR PERTORMING CAUBRATIONS y
- 1. Place gage in a room with controlled temperature one hour before calibrating.
- 2. Set the pressure to full scale of the gage. -[~7 Close the supply valve and let the system set for one (1) minute. If the pressure has dropped 0.1% of full scale,
- 13. C ack for, and fix all .laalis.
- 4. Deercise the gege through 4 cycles from sero to full scale before performing the calibration. (Be careful not to surge the gage with rapid pressure changes).
Sts: ling at zero pressure', tage readings (pictures) at each designated pressure point. Take each succeeding read-I$. ing on incrossing pressure until full scale is reached. Then take each succeeding reading on decretsing pressure until sero is reached. (Note: Do not allow the pressure to very more than 10% of full scale while ch. poing the weights on the dead waivht test'. _p
QISKLINE PHGE 1 oco FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPOPATION *** y,./.fg g ( BALANCE = TOROUE METER BRIDGE NO.= 2 JOB NO. 1240 00 DATE = 3/20/80 J/A o[(4 CALIBRATION NO.= 80.01 - LOCATION = CALIBPATION POOM DIRECTIOf1 OF LOAD <DEG.>= 0 { LORD = ROLL SIGN = NEG EXCITATION < VOLTS)= 10.020 STATION = 0 BALANCE TEMP (DEG F)= 74.O L X= Y= 0.000 0.000 ALL CALCULATIONS ARE IN MILLIVOLTS
--.s --------------------------------------------------- - -------------
W(LBS) RDG NET LIN(1) DELTA LIN(2) DELTA INCPE HYST.
--s--------------------------------------------------------------------
O 9.7048
-40 8.8054 -0.8994 -0.903 0.004 -0.896 -0.002 0.8994 0 000
-80 7.9070 -1.7978 -1.797 -0.000 -1.792 -0.005 0.8984 0 000
-120 7.0108 -2.6940 -2.690 -O 003 -2.687 -0.006 0.8962 0.000
-160 6.1130 -3.5918 -3.583 -0.008 -3.582 -O 009 0.8978 O. 000
-200 5.2368 -4.4680 -4.476 0.008 -4.477 0.009 0.8762 0.000
_ -160 6.1220 -3.5828 -3.577 -0.005 -3.582 -0.000 0.8852 0.000
-120 7.0212 -2.6836 -2.682 -0.001 -2.687 0.003 0.8992 0.006
-80 7.9172 -1.7876 -1.787 -0.000 -1.792 0.004 0.8960 0.009
-40 8.8154 -0.8894 -0.891 0.002 -0.896 0.007 0.8982 0.014 0 9.7132 LOADING LEAST-SOUAPES EQUATION = 4.85489E-01 + 4.48763E+02(LB4V/MVT MAXIMUM LINEAP DEV1ATION = 0.189 ?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
UtJLOADING LEAST-SOUAPES EOURTION= -1.53701E-01 + 4.47701E+02<.LB+V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION = 0.188 % ( AVEPAGE LEAST-SOUARES EOUATION= MAMIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION = 8 10742E-02 + 4 47759E+02(LB+V/MV) 0.212 % MAPIMUM HYSTERESIS = 0. 212
- ZEF.O SHIFT = 0.188 *.'
{ CALIEPATION BY:WM MOILANEN E . 1 A-47_ ps5 ~ l .
- ISKLINE PAGE 1 000 FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPOPATION 00*
BALANCE = TOROUE METEP JOB NO. 1240 00 BRIDGE NO.= 2 DALE = 3/20/80 CALIBRATION NO.= 80.04 LOCATION si CALIBPATION POOM DIRECTION OF LOAD (DEG.>= 0 SIGN = NEG LOAD = ROLL EXCITATION (VOLTS)= 10.020 STATION = 0 BALANCE TEMP (DEG F)= 74.0 K= 0.000 Y= 0.000 ALL CALCULATIONS APE IN MILLIVOLTS r---------------------------------------------------,--------------- W(LBS) RDO. NET LIN(1) DELTA LIN(2) DELTA INCPE HYST. r------------------------------------------------------------------- ( O 9.7150
-40 8.8106 -0.9044 -0.905 0.001 -0.904 0.000 0.9044 0.000
-00 7.9120 -1.8020 -1.802 0.000 -1.802 -0.000 0.8986 0.000
[ -120 7.0132 -2.7018 -2.700 -0.001 -2.699 -0.002 0.8988 0.000
-160 6.1136 -3.6014 -3.597 -0.002 -2.597 -0.004 0.8996 0.000
-200 5.2228 -4.4922 -4.495 0.003 -4.494 0.002 0.8908 0.000
( -160
-120 6.1194 -3.5956 -3.595 -0.000 -3.597 7.0160 -2.6990 -2.698 -0.000 -2.699 0.001 0.000 0.8966 0.002 0.8966 0.001
-80 7.9128 -1.8012 -1.801 0.000 -1.802 0.001 0.8978 0.001
-40 8.8106 -0.9044 -0.904 0.000 -0.904 0.000 0.8958 0 001
[- 0 9.7070 [ LOADING LEAST-SQUAPES EQUATION = 3.72632E-t1 + 4.46623E+02(LB*V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION = 0.076 % ( U LOR G LEAST SQUARES EO ATIO MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION = 55 E 1 +4 4. 0 070 7 2E+ LB il
------_-----__------_-------- =..----------------------------------------
AVERAGE LEAST-SQUARES EQUATION = 3.31098E-01 + 4.46600E+02(L84V/MV) { MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATIOf4 = 0.097 > MA:":IMUM HYSTEPESIS = 0 052 T.' ZEPO SHIFT = -0.178 : [ ____-________-________________-___-___--___________-_____-___________-- CALIBPATION BY:WM MOILANEN I [ [ [ [ . A-48 -
DibhCIhl @C6@ 1 oce FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORAT IOfJ oce Calda.d.., vs rs l DALAN.:t u TORGUEMETER DRIDGE NO.- 1 JOD NO DATE = 3-12-80 1240.0L du" 7 Terf 9[fz[8d I l LALIBRATION NO = DIFECTIOfJ Or LOADtDEG.)r 0 LOAD = ROLL 72.02 LOCATION = CH.7 SIGN = NEG EXCITATION (VOLTS)= 9.963 g OTATION = 0 BALAIJCE TEMP (DEG F)= 70.0 4' X = 0.000 Y= 0.000 ALL CALCULATIONS ARE IN MILLIVOLTS l ________________________..__-___________________________________________ ( WfLPE)
*O RDG.
3.5500 NET LifJt!) DELTA LIN(2) DELTA INCRE HYST.
-100 1.3772 -2.2228 -2.232 0.009 -2.234 0.012 2.2228 0.000
-200 -0. E976 -4 4476 -4.439 -0.008 -4.441 -0.006 2.2248 0.000
-3C' -O 1020 -6C6520 -6.646 -O 005 -6.647 -0.004 2,2044 0.000 l -400 -5.3044 -8.8544 -8.853 -O 000 -8 853 -0.000 2.2024 0.000
-500 -7.5052 -11.0552 -11.060 0.005 -11.060 0.004 2.2008 0.000
-400 -5.3012 -8.8512 -8.852 0.000 -8.853 0.002 2.2040 0.002 l -300 -3.0994 -6.6494 -6.647 -0.001 -6 647 -0.001 2.2018 -0.003
-200 - 0. P 9 f "- -4.4468 -4 443 -0.003 -4.441 -0.005 2.2026 -0.007
-100 1.314e -Z.2354 -2.23E O 003 -2 234 -0.000 2.2114 -0.003
} O 3.523D ll _______________________________________________________________________ LOADIlJG LEAST-SGUARES EGUATION= 1.12905E+00 + 4.51394E+02tLB*V/MV)
"*YIMUM LINEAR DEVI ATIOfJ = 0.083 %
I Uf1 LOADING LEAST-SGUARES EGUATION= 1.56C51E+..u 4 4.51959E+02tLB*V/MV) l MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION = 0.045 .. AVERAGC LEAST-SOUARES EGUATION= 1.3OOS4E+00 + 4.51578E+02(LD*V/MV)
'IMU". LINEAP DEVIATIOt! = 0.109
- hA t J hun HYSTEREE . -. - C C .;/_'
- ZERG EHIFT - v . i , ., ..
CALIBR ATION DY: M h i I 1 I 1 ,I ' l l I ! A-49 1
7 0W4bONU PAGE 1 oco FLUIDYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 000 BALANCE e TOROUEMETER JOB NO. 1240 00 BRIDGE NO e 1 DATE o 3-12-80 [ CALIDRATION NO = 72.01 DIRECTION OF LOAD (DEG.)= 0 LOCATION = CH 7 SIGN = NEG. LOAD = ROLL EXCITATION (VOLTS)= 9.963 STATION = 0 BALANCE TEMP (DEC F)= 70.0 X = 0.000 [ Y 0.000 ALL CALCULATIONS ARE IN MILLIVOLTS ________=____________________________________________________________ W(LDS) RDG. NET LIN(1) DELTA LIN(2) DELTA INCRE HYST.
-100 1.3328 -2.2288 -2.235 0.007 -2.221 -0.007 2.2288 0.000
-200 -0.8780 -4.4396 -4.437 -0.002 -4.425 -0.013 2.2108 0.000
-300 -3.0884 -6.6500 -6.638 -0.011 -6.630 -0.019 2.2104 0.000
-400 -5.2764 -B.8380 -8.840 0.002 -G.834 -0.003
{ -500 -7.4750 -11.0366 -11.041 0.004 -11.039 0.002 2.1880 0.000 2.1986 0.000
-400 -5.2668 -8.8284 -8.828 -0.000 -8.834 0.006 2.2002 0.011
-300 -3.0564 -6.6180 -6.621 0.003 -6.630 O,012 2.2104 0.020
-200 -0.8530 -4.4146 -4.414 -0.000
[ -100 0 1.3532 -2.2004 -2.207 -0.001 3.5660
-4.425
-2.221 0.011 0.012 2.2034 0.022 2.2062 0.027
[ LOADING LEAST-SOUARES EQUATION = MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION 1.562Ae" 0 4.52575E+02(LD*V/MV) _-________________-__________________=__________________________________ UNLOADING LEAST-SOUARES EQUATION = 6.34339E-03 + 4.51423E+02(LD*V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION 0.043 % [ _____________________________________=__________________________________ AVERAGE LEAST-SGUARES EQUATION = 7.61120E-01 + 4.5194SE+02(LD*V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION = 0.179 % MAXIMUM HYSTERESIS = 0.204 % ZERO SHIFT 0.039 % ______________________=____________-____________________-___-_-________ CALIBRATION BY: M. L [ [ l [ [ A-50
=
*co FLUIDYNE~ ENGINEERING CORPOPATION 000 4 7, , ,, ,9 JOB NO 1240.,00 C* /* '
[ BALANCE = TORDUE METER BRIDGE NO.= 2 . DATE = 2/25/80 2/zs/po CRLIBRATION NO.= 56.02 LOCRTION = CAL. Rii. SION = NEG. {'DIRECTIONOFLORD(DEG.)=0 LORD = ROLL EXCITRTION (VOLTS)= 10.022 STATION = 8 - BALRNCE TEMP (DEO F)= 72.0
- p M= 0. 000 L Y= 8. 900 RLL CRLCULATIONS RRE IN MILLIVOLTS .
p,g NET LIN(1) DELTR LIN(2) DELTR INCRE HYST. O -1.6368 40 -2.5346 -0.8978 -8.898 8.000 -0.886 -0.011 0.8978 0.000 [ -120 80 -3.4300
-4.3184
-1.7932
-2.6816
-1.791
-2.683
-0.002
- 8. 002
-1.782
-2.678
-0.010
-0.003 9.8954 9.8884 0.000 0.000
-100 -5.2142 -3.5774 -3.576 -0.000 -3.574 -0.003 0.8958 0.000 200 -6.2262 -4.4694 9. 900
{ - 163 -5.2000 -3.5712
-4.469
-3.571
-0.000 0.000
-4.470
-3.574 9. 003 0.8920 0.8982 0.000
- 0. 005
-120 -4.3130 -2.6762 -2.672 -e. 403 - -2. 678 8. 802 8.8950 9. 007 r -80 -3.4804 -1.7716 -1.773 8. Bei -1.782 8. Sie e.9046 8. e19 L -40 -2.5110 -e.8742 -e.874 e. 000 -e.886 e. 012 e.8974 0. 024 0 -1.6114
{ LORDING LERST-SQUARES EQUATION = 2.53601E-01 + 4.49044E+02(L8*V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTION = 0.051 % UNLORDING LERST-SQURRES EQUATION = -1.08921E+00 + 4.45917E+02(L8*V/MV) l MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTION = 0.082 % RVERAGE LEAST-SQURRES EQURTION= -4.27002E-Oi + 4.47437E+02(L8*V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTION = 0.255 % MAXIMUM HYSTERESIS = 0.437 % ( ZERO SHIFT = 0.568 % { CALIBRATION BY:WM. MOILANEN E [ . . m L E A-51 [ ? e T *
{Wdl -
*** FLUIDYtJE ENGINEERItJG CORPOPRTION *oo PAGE 1 BALRflCE = TOPODUE METER JOB NO. 1240 00
[ BRIDGE NO.= 2 DATE = 2/25/80 1 CRLIBRATIOtl#J0.= 56.03 LOCATION = CAL. RM. l DIRECTION OF LORD (DEG.)= 0 SIGN = NEG. ( LORD = ROLL STATION = 0 EXCITATION (VOLTS)= 10.022 BALRNCE TEMP (DEG F)= 72.1 X= 0.000 t Y= 0.000 RLL CALCULRTIONS RRE IN MILLIVOLTS { __ l WCLBs> RDO. NET LIN(1) DELTR LIN(2) DELTR INCRE HYST. ! [- O' -1.5864
-40 -2.4814 -0.8950 -0.894 -0.000 -0.889 -0.005 0.8950 0.000 83 -3.3778 -1.7914 -1.790 -0.001 -1.786 -0.005 0.8964 0.000
( 123 -4.2698 -2.6834 -2.685 0.002 -2.682 -0.000 0.8920 0.000
-169 -5.1680 -3.5816 -3.580 -0.000 -3.579 -0.002 0.8982 0.000
-200 -6.9630 -4.4766 -4.476 -0.000 -4.476 -0.000 0.8950 0.000 *
~5.1628
[ -163
-123 -4.2702
-3.5764
-2.6838
-3.578
-2.600 0.001
-0.003
-3.579
-2.682 0.003
-0.000 0.9002 0.8926 0.004 l 0.001
-03 -3.36c: -1.7804 -1.782 0.001 -1.786 0.005 0.9034 0.009
-43 -2.4704 -0.B840 -0.884 0.000 -0.889 0.005 0.8964 0.010 l
[. O ~1.5734 ( LORDING LERST-SQURRES EQURTION= -1 87638E-02 + 4 47740E+02 LB+V/MV MRXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTIOil = 0.049 % ( UNLORDING LERST-SQURRES EQURTION= MRXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTION =
-6.28869E-01 + 4.46354E+02(LB+V/MV) 0.079 %
RVERRGE LERST-SQUARES EQUATION = -3.21496E-01 + 4.47062E+02(LB*V/MV) [ MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTION = 0.129 % MRXIMUM HYSTERESIS = 0.220 % ZERO SHIFT = 0.290 % [ CALIBRATION BY:WM. MOILANEN [ [ [ [ [ r L A-52 6 ( pA
ItJE F HGE 1
**o FLUIDYrJE EfJGItJEERING COFPvPM110f 4 ***
(BALAfACE=TOROUEMETER JOB #10 1240.00 BRIDGE tJO = 2 DATE = 2/25/80 CRLICRHTIOtJ NO. = 56.04 LOCATIOil = CAL. Pl1 (DIRECTIONOFLORD(DEG.)= 0 sigil = POS. LORD = ROLL EXCITATION (VOLTS)= 10.022 STATION = 0 BALAfJCE TEMP (DEG F)= 72.1 X= 0.000 { Y= 0.000 ALL CALCULATIONS ARE IN MILLIVOLTS W(LCS) RDG. NET LIN(1) DELTA LIN(2) DELTA INCRE HYST. O -1.5508 CO -0.6566 0.8942 0.895 -0.001 0.896 -0.002 0.8942 0.000 ( 80 0.2416 1.7924 1.791 0.001 1.792 0.000 0.8982 0.000 120 1.1370 2.6878 2.686 0.001 2.687 0.000 0.8954 0.000 163 2.0302 3.5810 3.581 -0.000 3.583 -0.002 0.8932 0.000 2.9262 4.4770 4.477 -0.000 4.478 -0.001 0.8960 0.000 [ 200 163 2.0308 3.5816 3.583 -0.002 3.583 -0.001 0.8954 -0.000 123 1.1460 2.6968 R.688 0.008 2.687 0.009 0.8848 0.010 ( 80 0.2390 1.7898 1.793 -0.003 1.792 -0.002 0.9070 -0.001 ( 40 -0.6540 0.8968 0.897 -0.001 0.896 0.000 0.8930 0.001 l 0 -1.5536 ( ____ _______________ LOADING LEAST-SQUARES EQUATION = -9.82779E-03 + 4.47700E+02(LB+V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATIOt3 = 0.032 % ( UNLORDING LEAST-SQUARES EQUATION = -1.22428E-01 + 4.47800Et02(LB+V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATION = 0.187 % [ AVERAGE LEAST-SQUARES EQUATION = -5.23266E-02 + 4.47673E+02(LB+V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTIOt1 = 0.205 % MAXIMUM HYSTERESIS = 0.230 % ( ZERO SHIFT = 0.062 % ( CALIBRATION 8Y:WM. MOILANEN ( 1 t ( [ r L 4 r
/
A-53 ~/ Or 6 c f# l..
CIfJE one FLUIDYiJE EtJGItJEEPING C OEPORA11 ort +4 4 PH'A 2 { BALAf4CE BRIDGE IJO a =TOROUE 2 METEP JOB tJO. 1240 00 DHTE = 2/25/80 CALIBRATIOtJ NO.= 56.05 T' LOCAT IOff = CAL PM DIRECTIOrd OF LORD (DEG.>= 0 SIGt4 = POS. LORD = ROLL EXCITATIOld (VOLTS)= 10.022 STATION = 0 BALANCE TEMP (DEG F)= 72.2 p X= 0.000 L Yh 8.000 ALL CALCULATIONS ARE IN MILLIVOLTS WCLCS) RDG. NET LIN(1) DELTA LIN(2) DELTA ItJCRE HYST. [ 1 O -1.5526 43 -0.6554 0.8972 0.897 -0.000 0.899 -0.001 0.8972 0.000 i { C3 123 0.2430 1.1348 1.7956 2.6874
- 1. 793 2.690 0.001
-0.002 1.795 2.691 0.000
-0.003 0.8984 0.000 0.8918 0.000 160 2.0354 3.5880 3.586 0.001 3.587 0.000 0.9006 0.000
~ 200 2.9308 4.4834 4.483 0.000 4.483 0.000 0.8954 0.000 - 163 2.0334 3.5860 3.587 -0.001 3.587 -0.001 0.8974 -0.000 123 1.1406 2.6932 2.692 0.001 2.691 0.001 0.8928 0.002 80 0.2470 1.7996 1.796 0.003 1.795 0.004 0.8936 0.005 [ 40 0
-0 6540
-1.5470 0.8986 0.900 -0.002 0.899 -0.000 0.9010 0.001
[ LORDIf4G LEAST-SQUARES EQUATIOff= -3. 92646E 4.47171E+02(LB+V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIRTIOrd = 0.065 % p __ _________________________________ ________ ,_____________________ L UNLOADING LEAST-SQUARES EQUATIOf4= -2.39392E-01 + 4.47610E+02(LB+V/MV; MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVI ATIOld = 0.067 % AVERAGE LEAST-SQUARES EQUATION = -1.40301E-01 + 4.47396E+02(LB+V/MV) MAXIMUM LINEAR DEVIATIOf4 = 0.098 % (1AXIMUM HYSTERESIS = 0.128 % { ZERO SHIFT = -0.124 % ~ CALIBRATION BY:HM. MOILAf4ErJ [ [ [ [ - [ / A-54 e e 'f
k [ [ [ [ [ N [ APPENDIX B [ NUTECH Stress Analysis of 18-Inch Butterfly Valve [ [ [ F L [ COM-0708-03 r
L nutech San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station 7,,, go, ta g. i . ooti Owner Commonwealth Edison Comp .y Client Commonwealth Edison Co any SThub ANALYSIS OF 18' BuriERFLY VALVE { REFERENCES : ) l
\
I. T. S9 awL " Totya + Canttak Cha.unzhancs of SatL% Vala,' ASME Jomut . Dec.1961 l [ 2- Rhbf H.F. Pao."Fhd<t UecA2nia." J4t x1 3& Sr.t.Inc.199 P3 m !
- 3. Drvsden station Ha,'s%a nce r;Ie do.et-zo,'aucal haany xd b '
E 4 S P.Tasl66 as D.H.bn3," Eleme.sts of Shgk of Matreab .' [ D.h Voena Co9 g,1*c.1768 Pg. tB5
- 5. M.F. Spoth," DeAyt of Mach Eleuads Pau&a- Hall,Ii.c.,1971.P3 i::
- 6. Robed C. JoduR,"Engima.,3 Cen4Wtatin of Swec . S% ad b- SW tfu 3 " Mc Gm-Hill Bak Comp 3 . P3 zu
{ 7. Hw3 P4 Co., Dw3 N o.F-41," Pa.sb w Ma.d4 Speagucha, De c.10.1968 E 8. Oby . Janes ," MacLeufs Handbeck ", d Ed. % 382, P3n5P8Mo fas [
- 9. Fhdy Eq6st.$ h4m Tut Rent j 10 NOTECH CafmLW ,'3 H dqne.4 Analy,is of 18' Putt Buhg WhE,
- 1 Ruissi- l .aAk n/noh9 , b 9 , File no. 64. sot. oW4 l
[ l a l l { Revision Prepared By/Date 0 TSH /4-4-80 DAG /4-/4-80 p,g, og gy p Checked By/Date DAG/4 4 so TCHM-u-ac
[ nutech San Jose California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station 7, gg Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company SUMM ARY . [ SHAFT. STRESS and FACTOR OF SAFETY < in 6,a<tets) d _ A B C D Poge ( ,', 22-24 3,110 11,257 2,6 07
,g ,,,,5 (4.8) (i33) (575)
{ 7,555 2,io6 3 3055 is-t e (4.91) ( i.99 ) (7.12 )
. 4152.7 4J91 10.194 1.oi 5-9 (3.6 ) (3 50) (l47) ( I4.9 )
f 4g 3.331 10,711 439 39,2, L (4.5) ( 1.40 ) ( 34.I ) [ KEY 3 Shear Stress 1,273 rsi 2,s86 [ Comp. Stress ys; f PIN i Unit Mrkingstress 2,o32 75; ACTUATOR ARM ; Budirg Stress ' 75 5 Psi I ~ L Revision o p Prepared By/Date TSH /4-9-8 d 25 F~ Checked By/Date DACs /4-9-8o
L [ nutsch San Jose. Cahfornia Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station g, go,g g,,.gg Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company SHAFT. [ LOADS ON VALVE SHAFT l. Max. 3H dagek Totge tc43 1. sR4 th vatx 3c valec tut ( Ref. 9 ) AtA>eaf4 +f0tt th. wuta. totgut pituhA 1A tftc. [ vnfut. a abt 2w 4t-&.. Heu. m tw. Tt = 308' fv amewas s. And =A 3+ht +f2 wx.tettia. ocuwi aa et (d 3B' b *t M epe+t pontiew ( from Ref. 9 )
- 9. Ruina.13Tqu. b y ALA Ta = Tg = sod-'bs , 3,3,0 = wi, ,,0.
[ parer. fLjnt htcg, p I N 3. jung34gt oy li Fa. , T( t t 3so
,o - = 3 60 'k e h\ly LA
[ wf.r.tt. L= achater cws = to " F% s 4 Fene clu t &ckwy1 ah (R42) p' L
'v Fa = Pave 0=iAV%B Au T= sptdgc 9 of ah at 24,e3 ga = o354 %, 1 S graahd ambh = 32.2 the A = a;4. m - -J($f = i.7c7 W V = AA tk.gog at vafx = 3xYsec ( set bed. A .ned page )
[ 9'38' ( m . itt.1 i alnve ) t. Fa = $!!! (l767)(30of.63e*= 'oio
- Revision 0 P 3 l Prepared Dy/Date TSH/4 4 to g g Checked By/Date D*4/4-9 to
L nutech San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station p,,, go, g goi, %og Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company
. Insert A Frm ge to of Ref. io.
[ AeR _ [ Cc + Cc.\ ' g. gg3ge] A no., \ 2 1, j
. ( 0776+ ono )( g 433.)
{ = 0.359 Assg sos vefoQ al valot, tbal,th dQ qst^ tact Ya 1) . th = unuta.1 = P W Au " e % A, M N= VeloQ yirew V7 vQ at vah hat b Au = cou. 9&eas AT = Ma aA hd [ A- ma u e w W A u = V, A, [ M=V( T ) = Yl l )
= / Y3c RT l 257)
( = / tl4)(32 2)($3.'3)(560) ( 35T) Ib M4pt14 coutwAI5vf &u of l'o*f
%( : (1160)(.257)
I = 300 4 h/uc ; [ ( Revision 0 Page 4 Prepared By/Date TSH/4-t-80 of 25 P Checked By/Date DAG /4-9-t -
nutech San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station p,,, go, pfe,,opog Commonwealth Edison Company I owner Client Commonwealth Edison Company I l S. FM me. be4% mment aa sk fua : ( nTt rs Ta ' i ks.j h Pa Brg Ta Tt rp r - t O A 3c' i 3- (L D E
, g a l
- 4f l F. 7, ry, g +4f-F4 13.5" -
23- -- Y l Dl-u.4c. fnm Etf. 3 )
- h e ne p. betwcos phtcw fwa W flx dioctic s = 6 0' obt 6 h b Rei 3 I %Aw pen i 3 <o L e pu cast.3 F:
0 ' Fc,=Fo,=htat*= 2 (*:s . 532.s 1 Rs, = yg [ 360 p s32.s x i8.s4 532 s <4.s] = iio4. i 05 g RE,
- 3 60 + 53).8 = 2 - t 104.1 =321.5 s to 4.1 331.5 A
3 I D "E 360 $32.% 533.8 I "o - '"
-2it.3 4 44.1 BMD
~
-i+46 7 Revision o I Prepared By/Date TSH/4 4 ib Checked By/Date_ DAG/4 9.ec_
Page of 5 25 _ _ l
O@ San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station File No.f4.928 0006 Commonwealth Edison Company I Owner Client Commonwealth Edison Company I l @ In -& pfae pp.Jiwk to Fa : Fe, = Fe, = @ n. 8' ' 2 4. E' = 74.9 "' l R a, 8 R r , = 74.3 ' 14.9 m l 3 a c mo E T4.9 w.9 sFo I. In., l~ l
-T4.1 BMD N /
I -nr.os
<C) F n,,, <a) 4 zp above , we had an. bada3 meut M % = 4B 60 "'
- at B 36 ha d B Ve = / n44.o* 4 (74.9f = B7.9 "' (t d y a fs)
M' hudI$ memed at C kAc. = /050.Sf +(M7957 = tsm s fam, bcs. q,t C Vc = / (744.lf+ (14.3/ =1479 NS( to tk i cf C ) mo=ical ai D Mp = / (W46.7f+(HTAf = 14E5.4
. sAtar. bca. at D \/o = / 0)L5ft(74.9f = Mo,g 8' th tb rift of D) bu.Gj hin444 a.t A ua=o l 56 b d A W = no &
l I I l Revision 0 Prepared By/Date TSH/4 4 80 Checked By/ Data DAG/d m
L nutech San Jose, cahfornia f L Project _ Dresden Nuclear Power Station Owner. Commonwealth Edison Company File No. c4 P01.0006 Client Commonwealth Edison Campany F _SlRESS C ALCUL ATIONS , [ 1. At B . Um:4,eso ' * . T = 5.# "' vc 94t3 '55 br-3 Strm 7 = y = @ = iy$@,} 434c"I Touund Strm I' = TJ" = ETrEp)"dTrp a p = e6io PSI 5 6 h he .u g T= N ( Rf.4 ) A = Cm4 SuLJ Arm:$oxf: 3.H6 # y),40nt,,,g,3rs 3 (f.'rl6 ) Toi d Sfa w q = t'4 r" icio + 2so.s = isso.s * { Usinj ASUE Code for 1rnumiden shg ( q.5 ) s S = 7s , , p c4y ,gt y, w%. S = ux. sk duu La L && he+49 a taak S3 = YaAA Strm = so,cw Pi & Suh Stul3 T r M ( b. ASME Code ) FS = Facter 4 $ dst3 [ C. 4 ct - sb4 a.a Etip kbu C. = C t = 1 5 {.co.s e g gla,t M n a s h shg i b S = / ns #5*' f 4 o.s x issost = 429 FS= [S' T',7 = g [ r L R; vision O p,g, 7 Prepared By/Date TSH/4 4 to of 2s [ Checked By/Date DAte/4-HD
L [ nutzch San Jose, Californ" Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station File No.IA.801.Doo6 Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company 2-N04 k>c led. d Et Atua concudiatiew of sQt p (d C) [ /p = 2,g = 044 , Mc = 19sE8' , T= 3,6'o O', M = 'ini b S4rcu cencue facter Au. L be 4 3 kb=i86 ( R$ 6 ) E
- Nb
- Dm : Nb Trt//3 dD7g 8 ck45 '
d,y - . J.259,1 J.asf = 0.374$ N som maan at,A n = i.2 og s > g T'= kt h = kt 17py[g.apy = (138) $6126 3567 '51 b diu Y- T = 3# ITN t S$81J - b/ M .4luu cachtmEc\ hk uroCbh4 N T", Ys = 3.0
? " = K5 3 * (3 03 = '7514 337
[ , T' = T ' + 7 " : 356'i + 75 2A = 43 ti .4 M [ Lhir.j AsME Codt , C% - Ct = t 5 S = / @f + (ct n = 15 < / (io;y, s3n.e = io,m 6 n, m F s = .s s , , , , ,4 7 S 8 0. H * [ Revision o p g Prepared By/Date TSH /4 80
,, ;g Checked By/Date D % /4-4-0)
p i nutech San Jose, California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station Fife No.ia .691 0006 Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company 3. kg.:3 ehA & sQt (at A) Mx = 0 T=s.se 6-S % 36oes dvm T= 0 , g 1.*a serm e S ',6l""; ,6o # s u m e = % ::::: = - v " . I e . e. g. . aos.6 i-a . n3..w 1 g g arm mma ,ai a a i.c o g c g n > , ,. a m ASME Cedt. - I s = < ,.s me w , z. . < , , > < , e ,,s.., >= - >.g. 1 E, S , O. A't , S 15 7 % a s u.] 3g
- 4. At D : up = i4es.4 4 To \/3, aso.i ds l
TT D3
- 32(I425.41v ( 2 2sf
- i3* 8'4 pi U
- 33M Y=0 l I , ev 3A
_ 4 ( 3sm, _ no.7 est ti't 76) l S=('0,/@**t' S" =
= (t@ /('T' f* 0ioTP
= =====
i4 a
= lot o "
- rs = "S i,o i o 1
l I Revisien . Page 9 . Frepared By/Date TsH/4 Bo 2s I of Checked By/Date OAG/4-e-to ^ l
nut:ch San Jose. Cahfornia Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station File No. 64.801.0006 Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company SQUARE KEY . (atA) Alsi Cela A S44 dunc y da m y 0.55* = 0.55" x 4T' Icg ( Cd,7 )
,[i Fur.ea).sh$sn!,au.. F= =
'I,*; = 32 M 6'
g , [I Aa m sL fer % . o ss v 4.5 = ].4Tr M
$b drua & -Lj - Ss=3[7s'393"
- 2. oc k L SQt b Soy *$' ' 4 5 = 315
l C =.p e h w y . S c= 33" [3 = 2se6 PSI o.g I TAPERED Pil4. (al c ) S+Mm sted. is-8 Tp 304 -- g 30.m f5i (1 4 dq A m A p1w b s!Las (%.8)
' '"3 6#
S* * p'". d * * (2.as ) .= o3033ja ?Si O. K . de d : httats dIA f pk :l" ACTUATOR ARM. 65 , AA Patn Commuten [" n Fa = 3600 mom al H 360s G.5 s 234D I _ A m A a.u. A aa.e 4 ca.u.u & , I, MC _~ M (h)
- Gu _ s . (234o), MLgiO k, . T 1 RM2 h K' ~ Q O 3' I _
Revision 0 B Page to Prepared By/Date TSH /4-4-80 }g of 25 Checked By/Date Dt6 /4-9-80 ,
L nutech San Jose. California Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station File No.M,W.0406 Owner I,ommonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company [ si~ e.-u.< aa n n eweyses m y nor me userty.et -tte pvr-
, o[ w1bviruum, hydrodyr16mb't Yoffe, M FW5~COlf"WC LYC*^f" on eNhcr so'dc of w=3?] :
I. At X ' J b"
. r . ta s'.rt- % % M. 9 ror c anua%n wu Hiply T by 1.s "Ts~= 202. .Ut Ibs
. Vg .c } = L*;ll ~ 245 lbs , Lever am L= 10"
[ , .a,s_. (cc,z +cczv, > s,, Q (Re9 io) An [ - (ou2 4 zo. syn y,__ s,,, g) [ .es- [ t=v/E r
- 6/60y.gsr)
( Aoor [ = S74.2.!t/ve.- rd ' f AVhin u-
= {}h.)D.q)(suz)%n //eh 1979.E /6s..
[ , [ - C W 10 )
- \ NF d oy N p, F
l Revision O Page il Prepared By/Date IMC N-7-'80 Checked By/Date of 26 T3H /4- 7-So l
L. s nutech San Jose, California Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station pg,gopf, r ,e m ( Owner Commonwealtli Edison Company Client Commonwealtli Edison Company [ (a) L -+4.e plerc_ wrtais irg F : [ F,. , = F. , - y cos12 - T. cos.r2 = 96 6 /bs Re, ' M [(243 x 36.s)4 ( 966
- IB.s b ( % 6 5 4.5)] = /354 lb;.
h , ' 243 4(2 < 968 ) -Bc4 = 6?i lisc 13 54 826 p 8e o b Co [ o a
" 13 5 " f5': '
M' y 4,4 243 i
%?> %S eK 6FD
-143 l l
-Illi
[ 3 21' o . 5 [ 6Ho
~1714
-172I b
E I o { Revision Prepared By/Date DA6/4-7-so p Checked By/Date TSH /4-9-80 l
I~ nutech ; san Jose. California Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station File No.M D CCS f Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company l l _ (h) k -tk. pene. prpendiculse- 4o Fa. I r=r u g-pstr17'- 'y 5,'n I2*- Ros,714: . \ Q - Q - 2cs.7 tbs. \ l 205.1 z c r.;. , l A et c p r<- l l e m., 20=. , Em1 l SFD
-2oc,7 I
, EPO
- 2 5,7
'I Frw ca) ard (6) band wavedt at 8 Hg = $80.7l-Ist. deee force at 6 I berdig momat at c., Ve- Y6//I)%(2cE'?P ' = //29.9 lbs.
% = VGwo)% (9zs? ? - ms:.4 to-los.
Vothe <,yhrof E) One fone at C. 4.~ 4Qtt0%(20S17 - it29.9Iks(toseleficf t) l beedig moment at b Me,- V/372 i)N(9as ;)%3sS4,4;r ik dere fone. af h Vo =1ts2 s*>% czosnt' = eso.ias. .
, Ho Ytt !f th D}
I
- 2. . .-
Revision o p Prepared By/Date IE/4-7-So l Checked By/Date TSH /4-9-80
nutech San Jose. California Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station File No.ld 80!.CM'c Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client _f ommonwealth Edison Company STETSS CAL UI ATIOAIS l
- 1. ht 6 He - 3200.5 fo, Ik. ~T~c 2430in-Ibs Ve = //29.9 lbs .
l Beadig shss a %- .7[lb ' ##'3# PSI mioosI swas z'- @ - L]2lllb = ion.s pi shew in Ex.1do'n T "- $
- Ef,[h s = 376.9 pti G
*T5*ttI sheer T = T-+T - /o% T+ 379.9
- M4 6.4 p; 5= \/(cm {}2. , (p< 7 p' g, , gt , ,, y l S = ls 4("*1'9 +(146s'.4f S= .3//o pd F5 =- @ = Q I 2. /! c. Me= 195 2.4 * - Ibs ~T= 24 50 in-lbs Q ' //29.9Ibs
\
Serdig stress %.% =. IG, . m _ g o yj-- = /,ci fgsz. 4 ,, . l " Torsional s1Tru K . u ,n=Is. n y,g_.sny,=6.asM24sA ,pe,,,,; t Rs N * (3.4 Ik'9$jf = /'36 7 gci
/.3978 I
9e6rirkrd/g l
~151rl sbeer r= c '+ 7" = 2407,7 + t136 7 = 55444 psi S - t si@Yf'7+ (ssn.4Y" = LIJ56.9 yeo'
( I FS = #{$% = g f Revision O Page Q Prepared By/Date CAG/4~/-80 of 25 Checked By/Date EH /4 80
L . nutech san Jose. california Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station File No.M M'. CCD6 [ Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company b At D [ Mo = 3834.4 ,L-fk P o , - - /b .
% = eso/A:
[ 6rMll 1 drs% Q~= uM * (.W.3634.4) rrph rr(7, g c)1~
- 528.9f Li rorsionI sTresc 2' & = 0 7
=
shar in wdisj r ,- Y = %k s.ow ~A zes. p,' [ "Tb1ei O eb r- ? 'T. = ~C % T " - O o 2265 = 28 5 ysi r S= 1.5 R&'-1(285 .7 ' - 260kgst [ Fs= NoY " 575 [ l [ [ [ E E E Revision o l [ p Prepared By/Date DA6 /4-7-80 ,, yg r Checked By/Date TSH /4-9 Bo l.
[ nutech Sas Jose, California Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power St . tion File No.M Mw6 Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company ar w
~ ^
. .x.
c
- T t ' IE ft -- l bs . y l. 5 = 70 2.T ft -lbs .
F e (' * $ " \ = MSIk Lc.!" sw L = 10" I" - (a p)(i-au) (rme 40)
. (# * +; *)c ,_ s,w g)
.us
" ' 1 (IIGDX.366) = 427 R/g
[
' Vcl = A V
- Sirs M =f ft,]L7f42jfsin 28* = Ib6?.S16: .
[ (0) Ts 4L ple e t C08&It 'eg Fx ' 6, = fp, - $ CCL 2* * ' Y Col 2' = 850.n Ibc. { k*2 [(313 / 36.5)4 (63).9 x 18 5)4(2,30.9 x4.T)] = /2/6.f/hs. Q, = 2n n(2 < sw.o) - nu.s see.1 is:. [ , , , , ses.z A Sv c, u re Sm9 eso.4 hsB:b SFD { -97J,5
-H 2.6
-//ou3 h Revision O Page 16 Prepared By/Date CM/4-7-60 of 25
{ Checked By/Date m /4-9 80
I. nutech San Jose. California Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station p,g, no,6f,Et.00M Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company llb) x,, ti e. plo,,e. p rped icufor To Fr l s Fe., . Fo, = $ sin 2* - 29 lbs, 1 Sines -tWs owmber is so s"6II (3.5% of +/e nu~kr in (of), l +hh ph,,c will k. fyond. I STEI ses CALCtXATiods I At E Fig- 37i!c.5 /,.lbs 'D 2-/30i,-Ibs Vs -973,5 Eerdirj dre.45 (F5 * [,ff # 7933.Fgs.)
-751dessI strest 'C'= W " N,(7lE!,= tossg pi' l
9eer in %dirng -C"= h' = 326.6 ps: TotrI sicee t - t 's c - toes.s + su. c = 141sysi l 5= !.SYl" 5 T +(I4' W = 30 % m) Icpcn Fs = 3ps5
- 4dl I
M d e, c llCC,*5 le - 16 s,. 'T 2450 in Ibs . W ~ 973.s!bs.. , e stoo.a. Seeding dress Kb %e= A, rroysz. doYc ' / % aezm = 7455.6gs/ g ,
'TorsionA stress Kt Cnor, ~ h wy -Myg ' !.*8 bhSE " 2407.7pi h $heas in bending Vs-h ' (3,0)4(073.s)y3,ogj = 979.4 pi j -Trfdl shear Te t'+r" 2407,7+ 9'M,4 = 3387. I psi
. $= l 5 Y[ "$* Y+(53s7.IY ~ 7,55T pci rs = r 99 Revision O p,g, i7 Prepared By/Date DAS /4-7.D ,, 79 Checked By/Date TSH /4-9-80
nutech b San Jose, California Project Ouad Cities Nuclear Power Station g, g,, f,f, cy,g,. [ Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Commonwealth Edinon Company Client l
._.i At D
[ Ma c 509b.7 in-M. T= 0 in-/bs. Va= Geo.t162. 7 u Bered&14 8fe% G~* ga nu ~ nzon% Trd? 2 G)' " 2750.2-PG ? E 78,sur d<ms t'- hT = o Pi c 9,ese in be< ding t= W=Nff,)l}=2szsp; L W e l s h t ? y- [* T'+ [ = 0 47 9.f 7306 p:' E s - i.ss(eim (nae >" ~ zios.s n - 15.oco [, FS= a ws. e =
- 7. /2 b
E E E E r . . _ L [ E Revision O Page se, Prepared By/Date 3A6/4 7-80 f of . 2q g Checked By/Date 75N/4-9-80 i '
~
' nutech San Jose. California Project Ouad Citica Nuclear Power Station p,;, no, @/.om', Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Compar.y
. M. At 45 .
_. g. b , 7 ~ is 7,5 ft -lbs. x I.T = 236 f1-/hc. - 293z /r_/h: .
*&= 95'~^ ' 265.7 Ibc.
(I- Si Mb")
=
{ (t-ss% c<) c (R'*A 10 )
..I75 b
, Vu = W (Aegt , fits o)(,g7 Q = g w a p p e e, e Aeow
[ . ,
- Fd = A V'Sie * = (* 52.z )(!.7b7)(2LOM)'S i a (4b)~ 551. 5 lbt .
[ (a) ra -He pla,e conteleiq FO F4 = Fe,, h cot 16 = Y cot.16 = 276.5 /bs. { 123, dI[(2er.zs u.s)+(zwsus.s)+(276.5x#,5)] = 72s.-9 /6: . [ ge, = 283.2 t (7 *2 74. U -72 5. c) = //o.516c.
] 7K.9 J /0.'s A Sc c. s cv o 2, s, l
[ ' 273 5 2LT [ 'i 295,t
, , soa e,p p -lM,Z
- e z. ,
B ! L Revision O p,g, gg Prepared By/Date 0%/473o of 73 Checked By/Date TSH /4-9 Bo
L . [ nutech San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station File No.6l%/,W6 [ owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company [ { G) h ~+4r ylaee prp, edicufar To Fo
^
F3 Fe c Fe, = z dr /6 - fA' < )' 5 le 18'
- 89.*:. Iht.
[ Q
- Pt , = 89. B 'ht -
[ s9.8 ,,. 3 [ p B - c v v c
, s.
[ w.e m,s
'e. s
[ SFD
- eo.e.
[ [ , BMD 4 [ rro n, ca3 a d (b): ; [ Mar. barg ,,weet M,,,,, - ss21 s I.,- 16s. at c [ skeer {vue at B Ve, = 1/(4(z.7P4 (sop _,f = 4/.7 /As, [ %d:n3 mwestst C. tic ~ V(/esi)' H4ct. D - is75.1 u.th. S!4ee r f ec .4-c, Ve =Vpfr,7)' r(59,5)~' - r asI.7tss. l [ T% d,% moneef st b d u - W495.S T -1 M s.t) % 639.6 1.,-\62 l l Dhe7r rec a'f' D W = Y[/66.7)3-+(8^.P>)*'- 18S91k. l [ Revision o p Prepared By/Date N /4-7-90 of 25 " Checked By/Date TSM /4-9 80
nutech [ San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station g, g, y pp,g Commonwealth Edison Company ( Owner Client Commonwealth Edison Company SWERR C A t. Lot AT IOkl5 At S. _ He wza.z is lb . n = zerz is Ib: Vv. = 451.7 :: . r L gert/ Q,7 drc% <r - M,$ = 32 7f 5f[z43 2b ney -
%<sional stress T =- & = ' Y l.$ 0 \ = 12 6 9 A p l
[ Shear in bending [^= -$k- = I4h#90}; =- 151.5 pi ' 7btsI sleer T = Z '4 T = 176L t)n ist. 5 = /417.4 p.; [ S = 0.sN("'l%(14174f = 3530 9 ed , Fs = 190s335.9 = 4. r [ MC: Mc - 1e75.1 i<-Ib s . 7= 25!J i<_iss. % = 451716:. irwb2.- sorts = (1.86)ma [ Eufny stres ks.s_- % arp ; ' !? 105.6r=I i
.i r- zu =.
7Fecio,eI sfrecs L't G.n - l'e ~ w w,--do%, /.m 7. scs - zsapsi [ 4)ffsth
%a< is bes&q L:, T'oAz,o)(ton.E:> 4s4.4y :'
-To1rI & ear t c'+ t > 250& + 454.4 = 3 26o.4 ,e ;
( 1 s= f,5 V(,7l")% (suo.4)2'= /0,7/o.9 ys' f5 5TC--
/oj 7/0.9
- I.so
[ 4tD: tt = 639 6 In-las. T= o ; - 16s . V,= /8S.0 /b .
&n. dig s-tress cr= $ ~ I' k $ 7$iV = 5 72 psi
~7Mal Shear- C> 7 '+ Z
- O Y (4)'IM01~
gc3,4)76) O + 6'3 ' 63.5 MI [ s=(i.sM e9 4 n i FSr- /6,000/(2+-)'y 439.4= M / sa.a T= Revision o - Page y, Prepared By/Date DeG//.7_go of 25 c' Checked By/Date TSH/4-9 so l
b nutech San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station File No. MMt 0006 [ Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company E L JT. a n e? L [ Tocox = -/D ft-lbs. . (EE F. 9 ') FOC CotJ5ETcVLTISH p tAULTIPLY CY I.7 Tus (s.5kyo) = 105 ft-Ibs = 1260 in-IL: . ~ Fa = H x . Gir2 so ' 126 Ib s . L ASSOMC SD%'t C- VELO &TY Ar VALVE
- T42%r (TMtS 1s cev5E?:!!~E-
~ 9 Of.E h = 0.737 >O,525) ps; (s.]Go-sca)-(m'%0snyr-as s') we.ro)
= O. (-%
- YL'
- YTf Y\ = (IlbOf0 b32)= 74Dff-lSf(.,
LAn:n-) [ g o - f- dsa =(tl%)<i.ys,)crio)' si,, s'
*- 1460.5 lbt ,
i [ n V 2 2 FJ w - l l F L l r, g ( Revision O Page 22. Prepared By/Date DAG/4-6-fC d 27 F Checked By/Date TSH /4 80 i
( nutech San Jose. California Dresden Nuclear Power Station File No. M 9t10006 Pr:iect f Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company [ .
@) IN 'THu~ PLMc c4 Fa :
[ su., uz.2 , l A B, , c. 2, ro 12 6 666,2. 6M. 3 Rc, = R'O. = hCm22*= -Af cos 22 = G sS.5 lba, Ce, - E ((126 < 36,5)* (606.3 x 15.5)+ (686.3 4.s)3
- 866.314 s.
I2E,
- I 126 + (25 6fE'd' D.3 2 = 6f 2.3.16: .
6 tz.s ( SFD [ m ( 760.3 , I [ - nos [ afD I 1 72o.4 [ -2756.4 [ [ [ l l Revision o Page 23 Prepared By/Date OAG/4-3-so of 25 Checked By/Date TSH /4 so [ 1
L nutech b Sr.n Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station File No. M 80l.0006 [ owner Commonwealth Edison Company Commonwealth Edison Company client b ' [ CONCLUSION. { It seo,u & stremo cet +fk affecta paa sucA ao sg, squa^o k , ttgeuA pht a+d actuates wwt, a.4 dth M stre44u accotdiej to tko antray stregt of { in W d m M . [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ r L I [ Revision o
- Page .25 Prepared By/D-*e TsH /4-4-so of 25 7 Checked By/Date M/4-b
( .
I~ nutech San Jose. California Project Dresden Nuclear Power Station Fele No 64.9t ino6 Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company
.. . Gz) DJ Twr R.A+JE 'PERPEhlbic.0LAL'TD F~n
- 777. L 2 '7 7. ~5 A By c, b 6'r E f A 6 277a5 m,5 Pg2s Ep - Si n 22 = Sth 22 =
277. E /k . l Re, = cc , = 277, s /6 . 277.3 SFe> I .m. 3 i 1 BMD
-1247,9 I (c) STCESS C A L CtJL! TIOU S gaJb WG MOMPlT AT d., M e= Y(1770.4P+Q247.9f: 7'2 E Un-1 M SHChe. FO2d AT C- Vc," Y(76a5Yt (277.5i '= SO9.S ILt.. ,i AT c.
- pq , ,, e .,
PE N DutJ 6 STE P;.L &% riuVsz- du'/s ' ll Eb) .25s" /4,401 fsi l
'E T izso E Tol2'SloNAL STEESS [=Ve in>S/s.-dD% " 6 38) 43%S " /Ffe.4rsi 1
4XB0). D . SILAE.10 ED)DA)G f . % 4V TC * (LO)((5y3,iy7g) c 614.2 pr
~ -
! . l l TOTA L. SH CA2- T = T '+ 'l < /248.4+ Sigt = 20W.6 g:& l ! S = 0.s) V('@)% (scua.6)# = is,zsresi FS= h * /.34 Revision O Page ;4 Prepared By/Date W/4-6-6 f 25 Checked By/Date TSH/4-9 80 __}}