ML20138K208

Rev 0 to Roles & Responsibilities of Dresden Engineering Assurance Group

ML20138K208
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	11/18/1996
From:	Frehafer K COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20138K202	List: ML20138K196 ML20138K208
References
DTI-DE-15, DTI-DE-15-R, DTI-DE-15-R00, NUDOCS 9702180054
Download: ML20138K208 (7)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ ....m . . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . ._..

2.- . .

I I

DTI-DE-15 ~

4 i REV.O j ATTACHMENT 3 i

j- I 1

i 4

J

)

1 l

l l Roles and Responsibilities of'the l

) Dresden Engineering Assurance Group i

i DTI -DE-15 l

1 L Rev.0 L

i 3 lu w/$/] o si/,e/s i i l

Prepared by

Kenneth W. Frehafer l

r I

-( W //

/(

ff Approved by: Plant Engineering Superintendent i

D l

1

(_ 0 -

f, I L ll g /p g,

) Approved by: Design Engineering Superintendent i t

J 1 4 l.

i 1

(

I h:\wordperf\ desktop.wpd Page 1 of 7 1

9702100054 961206 1

PDR ADOCK 05000010

PDR

i j 1

i, .. Table of Contents i

, ]

4 Cover Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....1

.4 4

i

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ...2 a

d l 1.0 Purpose . . . . . ... .. ................. .. .. .... .. ...... 3 i

! 2.0 Scope ................................... . ....... ...... 3 ,

i i 1

3.0 References . . . . . . . .. ... .............. ....................... 4 i i

I l

i l 4.0 Responsibilities . . . . . . . . ...... ... ... .. ... .......... .. ... 4 4

5.0 Instructions . . . . . . . . . . 4 l, ....... . .... .. ................ .

1 l

J l

i I

l Attachments t

t l

l Attachment A, DEAG Review Sheet .. . .. . .... . . . ... . . 1 Page 1

1 e

.I f

s h

4-l l

4

}

4 1

4 f

d a

f i

i

a 1.0 Purpose

[ ne Dresden Engineering Assurance Group (DEAG) was formed as a result of

( commitments made to the NRC during the NRC ISI inspection (reference 3.1). The purpose of the DEAG is to insure that engineering activities validate, maintain, and if necessary, reconstitute the Station's design bases.

1.1 The purpose of this instruction is to provide guidance to the DEAG on conducting

oversight / reviews of engineering activities for design bases compliance.

1.2 This instruction provides a method for documenting DEAG reviews of engineering i

activities.

1.3 This instruction governs the administrative reporting requirements of the DEAG.

i j 2.0 Scope i

.' DEAG oversight activities will be weighted toward issues relating to the most risk significant systems. The DEAG will provide oversight of the following key engineering activities for Units 2 and 3:

! 2.1 Design change activities (DCPs, ECNs, Exempt Changes, Temp Alts, Setpoint l Changes, DCRs).

2.2 Operability evaluations.

j 2.3 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluations.

l 2.4 Engineering evaluations performed at the request of the Station'(Doc ids).

1 1 2.5 Calculations.

l 2.6 Surveillance trending to identify potentially degraded equipment.

2.7 Special Test Procedures.

i 2.8 Performance Improvement Report (PIR) process as it relates to the identification of potential operability issues.  ;

i 4 2.9 Licensee Event Reports (LERs).

4

2.10 Other activities as requested by the Site Engineering Manager. l 3

i 3.0 References

! [e 3.1 Comed letter from J. Stephen Perry to A. Bdl Beach dated November 8,1996.

4 a

. - - n , --

4.0 Responsibilities O

h 4.1 The DEAG Team Leader or designee is responsible for:

4.1.1 Ensuring the DEAG oversight activities comply with the requirements of this DTI.-

1 4.1.2 Generating DEAG reports to the Site Engineering Manager and direct reports.

4.1.3 Assigning DEAG members for oversight / review of engineering activities. I 4.1.4 Coordinating with SQV when required.

4.2 DEAG Team Members are responsible for providing oversight of engineering l activities and documenting results in accordance with this procedure. i 4.3 The Plant Engineering Superintendent and Design Engineering Superintendent are responsible for ensuring that the DEAG is notified of their cognizant engineering activities.

5.0 Instructions  !

NOTE i DEAG oversight activities are intended to be real-time and concurrent with respect  ;

to the engineering activity being evaluated. The oversight philosophy should 1 encourage questioning attitudes with regards to the licensing and design bases.

5.1 Oversight Activities 5.1.1 The DEAG member assigned to the engineering activity is responsible for interfacing with the activity lead and/or cognizant Engineer.

O G

,. 5.1.2 The DEAG member shall confirm during the review that the cogmzant  :

engineering group insures that the activity is within the current licensing and design bases of the Station. The review shall:  !

5.1.2.1 Verify that design inputs and assumptions are validated, or if j necessary, verify that the design basis is reconstituted. Verify  ;

that use of historical inputs and analyses are validated, or insure {

that the design basis is reconstituted. J l

5.1.2.2 Verify that the activity is enveloped by the Station's licensing . I and design bases (such as the UFSAR, SERs, and DBDs),

i 5.1.3 The DEAG member should confirm during the review that the cognizant engineering group insures that all applicable design inputs are considered and incorporated into the activity being reviewed. NEP-12-01 or the Station Design Issues Worksheet may be consulted.

5.1.5 The DEAG member shall insure that the 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation rationale is correct.

5.1.5 The DEAG member shall be sensitive for any potential operability concerns that may develop during oversight activities. Potential operability concerns shall be processed in accordance with Station Procedures.

5.2 Review Documentation Requirements 5.2.1 The DEAG member shall document his review of the activity on I Attachment A. Comments should be made for any problems encountered I during oversight. Good practices noted during oversight activities should i also be documented.

5.2.2 Completed documentation shall be forwarded to the DEAG Team Leader.

i

j *

• q

- , 1

(

j ,

5.3 DEAG Reporting Requirements a

j 5.3.1 The DEAG Team Leader will develop a monthly report on oversight 1 l review activities. ,

1 5.3.2 The report should summarize the observations documented by the Team. I

j. i

5.3.2.1 Deficiencies in the availabilit' and/or retrievability of design i bases information should be r ated.

1

• I 5.3.2.2 Strengths and good practices should be noted.

! 5.3.2.3 Improvement opportunities should be identified.

i I i l

1 4 i i l

l

! End of Text e

1 1

i l

i t

t p

(

l I

i e

1 i

1 l

1 i l 4  ;

a  !

2

)

)

Att: chm:nt A, DEAG Revie f Sheet ACTIVITY REVIEWED:

l id the activity reviewed validate the Station's licensing / design bases?

OYES O NO UFSAR, SERs, DBDs, etc. envelop the activity.

D YES O NO O N/A Any potential operability concerns were resolved in accordance with Station procedures.

DYES O NO The assumptions and design inputs necessary to perform the design activity were ;

validated. If no, enter NTS tracking #  ;

Other issues:

l l

0 YES O NO O N/A 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation rationale was correct.

a YES O NO O N/A If the activity spanned multiple disciplines, communication between interfacing Engineering disciplines was effective.

Any comments on the activity reviewed? O YES O NO Comments: l f 1 '

x_,,

l l

l l

1 I

I DEAG Member: Date:

/m

/ \

\v/