ML17223A230

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 890517 & 25,iron Concentration from Radwaste Batch Discharge Exceeded Max Concentration Limit.Source of Iron in Effluent Stream Under Investigation
ML17223A230
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1989
From: Woody C
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-89-252, NUDOCS 8907250305
Download: ML17223A230 (6)


Text

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8907250305 DOC.DATE: 89/05/31 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie"Plant,,Unit 1, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000335 50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME 'UTHOR AFFILIATION I 7

WOODY,C.O. Florida Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION I

SUBJECT:

NPDES monitoring rept for May 1989 for St Lucie Units 1 &

2.W/890717 ltr. D DISTRIBUTION CODE- IE25D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: 8 TITLE:, Epvgronmental.Monitoring-Rept (per-Tech pecs)

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPXENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME ~ LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 LA 3 3 PD2-2 PD 1 1 NORRIS, J 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 AEOD/DS P/TPAB 1 1 IRM TECH ADV 1 1 NRR ROTHMAN, R 1 1 ,S NRR/DEST/ADE 8H NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1

'1 1, Rg~ P/RPB 10 01 2

1

'. 2 FXLE,02 1'2 RGN2 DRSS/RPB 2 RGN2 1 1 EXTERNAL EG&G SXMPSON 7 F '2 2 LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 I

~ ~

D h

D D

NOTE 'IO ALL 'RIDS" R1XXPIZNXS:

S PURSE HELP US 10 BEDUCB HASTE! GM5KT 'IHE DOQ3NERZ CGPZROL DESK, RXN P1-37 (EXT. 20079) To ELXMINATB VXR NAME PKN DISTEGBVTXGN LISTS HZL DOCUMENTS RXJ DCRPT NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 21 ENCL 21

P.O. Box14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 JULY, 1 7 1989 L-89-252 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Environmental Protection Plan Report Dischar e Elimination S stem NPDES 'e National Pollutant ortable Event In accordance with Section 3.2.1. of the St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Environmental Protection Plans, attached is a copy of the Discharge Monitoring. Report (DMR) required by the St. Lucie Plant NPDES Permit with .respect to a reportable event. Additionally, a description of the event is provided.

Very truly yours, C. O. Wo Acting nior Vice President Nuclear COW/MSD/gp Attachments cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant II, USNRC S907250305 S9053i .

PDR R

ADOCK 05000335 PDC Z(p5

']i an FPL Group company

PERMIITEE NAMBADDRESSllarfvdr NATIONALPOLLUTANTDISCHARGE ELIMINATIONSYSTEM(NPDESJ Form Approved tanlay NararlCo<aravr t(rtrl(rrrarl.

NAME I nlr ra L I i LI 2 w DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT(DMRJ (2-!6J (Iy.ltd F F' NAL ORB No. 2C~

Approval expires 6-3n(88 ADDRESS I rV tt I R t j i: 'r l NI T A L A F F A t I( S RAtJHASTE t)ISCHARGE

>rj .>u.'. 1 I VUu PERMIT NullDER DISCHARGE NUMBER Jrjr<<j <~i At.i, FL 33(sOo MONITORING PERIOD FACILITY DY YE HA JOR (SUI3R JA)

LOCATION FROM TO AI'.'- I tt F ATi (20.2IJ (22-23J (24-253 (16.2TJ (1d-2gJ (30-3 IJ NOTF Read lnstructlons before completing this form.

(3 Cant Orttyl OUANTITYOR LOADING (6 Cant OnlyJ OUALITYOR CONCENTRATION NO. FREOUENCY SAMPLE PARAMETER (S6.33J (544IJ (Id' (4S33J (34-6IJ EX OF TYPE l32.3 2J ANALYSIS AVERAGE MAXIMUM UNITS MINIMUM AVERAGE MAXIMUM UNITS (69.70I (644dJ

'r I)L I t)S T0 TAL

rUSP "iVUi.lj e SAMPLE MEASUREMENT ~l,k I

'J(I>3v 1 IJ 0 PERMIT

<. F I-L UL-.IVT 4FLOS S VALU REOUIRFMENT DAILY AV DAILY HX LBS/D DAILY AV DAILY HX HG/L DISC illL ANJ t REASY SAMPLE I I(I.'jN I XT It-lsRAV HLT MEASUREMENT tjtj >56 1 0 1 PERMIT I:I-FLUL-.IVT t kUSS VALU REOUIREMEHT DAILY AV DAILY HX LBS/O DAIL% AV DAILY H HG/L PH!ISPHURUSc T'I L SAMPLE (AS I') MEASUREMENT IJfj(bo 1 0 0 PERMIT

.FI=L JI NT tsII.OSS VALU REOUIREMENT DAILY AV DAILY HX LBS/D DAILY AV DAILY H HG/L CUPP~RT tf1t3%2 1 TOTAL (Aa CU) 0 0 SAMPLE MEASUREMENT PERMIT

~ 13 ~(5 I.FFLUtNT GKUSS VALU REOUIREMENr DAILY AV OAILY HX LBS/0 DAILY AV DAILY H HG/L 1KI)NY ILITAL SAMPLE (AS F~) MEAsUREMFNr ,Q. I l ~ f3L, V. IO f310 f) 1 0 0 PERMIT REPORT R L. F icLULIeT GRLISS VALU REOUIREMEHT DAILY AV DAILY HX LBS/0 DAILY AV -r,DAILY ll HG/L F.L JHY 1N CONDUIT OK ltdRU TR ATHENT PLAN SAMPLE MEASUREMENT b

>Ots';J 1 0 0 PERMIT REPUR R I FI-LJi=NT GRUSS VALU REOUIREMENT DAILY AV DAILY HX HGO DISC SAMPLE MEASUREMENT PERMll'EOUIREMENT NAME/TITLEPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER TELEPHONE DA'r E I certify under penalty of law Ihal this document and all attachments C, Oi El<E-'

Oo

~EX~u ~~<~~

~ were prepared under my direclion or supenrilon in accordance with a system designed lo assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate Ihe rnformatmn submitted. Based on my inquiry ol the person or Q, 9 persons who manage thc system.or those persons directly responsible lor galhering Ihc intormation. Ihe information submilt cd is,tothcbeslolmy ATURE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE TYPED OR PRINTED know and belrel. true. accurate. and complele, I am aware thai OFFICER OR AUTHORIZEDAGENT are signncanl pcnakl~ for submitting false intormatron. includingthere Ihe NUMSER YEAR MO DAY COMMENT AND EXPLANATIONOF ANY VIOLATION Possrbiidy of <<ne and imPrisonmenl for knowing violations.

~lfr, h~T,'sL iL=a'ql r'A.iT.=S A~L- OISCHAIt~Lue THE LIUANTITY OF POLLUTANTS DISCHARGED ANO MONITORING FREQUENCY ilALL I I .( I'3'c >i I UPP -k AtttJ 1 tjII LliclTS ANIJ HUNITORIIVG ARE APPLICABLE AND yfHEN PH SPHA E,,CHEHICALS AR EA or 20-(ev. -

, , NDD v

IREPLACES EPA FORM T~ WHICH MAYHOT SE USED) ns s e3t A'7/nr. l 1uA 0- iv

DESCRIPTION OF THE EVENT On May 17 and 25, 1989, the iron concentration from the radioactive waste batch discharge (serial 003) exceeded the 1.0 ppm maximum concentration limit. The concentrations determined were 4.1 and 1.2 ppm, respectively. The volumes associated with these discharges were 5,414 and 26,682 gallons, respectively. The exceedances were discovered June 7, when metals analyses were completed on stored samples for the month. Prior to April, 1989, these samples were composited and analyzed in a different manner and no values ever exceeded 1.0 ppm for iron, thus values in excess of this limit were not anticipated from this serialized discharge.

The source of iron in this effluent stream is being investigated so in the future, discharges containing elevated iron levels can be identified and the water further processed by filtration and ion exchange prior to release.

r

~ (\ ES H

II I(

t