ML17309A784

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1994 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept St Lucie Plant Units 1 & 2. W/950419 Ltr
ML17309A784
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1994
From: Sager D
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-95-113, NUDOCS 9504250267
Download: ML17309A784 (90)


Text

'

PH.IC)R.I (ACCELERATED EV RIDS PROCESSING)

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9504250267 DOC.DATE: 94/12/31 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000335 50-389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power & Light Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SAGER,D.A. Florida Power &,"'Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

"1994 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept St Lucie Plant Units 1 & 2." W/950419 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IEZSD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR t ENCL I SIZE: 0 +

TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)

NOTES RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-1 LA 3 3 PD2-1 PD 1 1 NORRIS,J 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS NRR/ADAR/PDLR 1

1 1

1 RG E CENTER 0 PB 1,

1 1

1 RGN2 FILE 1 1 EXTERNAL: LITCO AKERS, D 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM PI-37 (EXT. 504-2083 ) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS I'OR DOCUMENTS YOU DON "I'EED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 12 ENCL 12

h l'- t

c Florida Power & Light Company, P.O. Box 128, Fort Pierce, FL 34954-0128 April 19, 1995 L-95-113 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50.36 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket No. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Radiological Environmental 0 eratin Re ort for Calendar Year 1994 The Attached report is being submitted pursuant to Technical Speci fication 6. 9. 1.8. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information summaries and analytical results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the calendar year 1994.

Please contact us if there are any questions about this submittal.

Very truly yours, CW~~ ~

D. A. Sager Vice President St. Lucie Plant DAS/GRM cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region Senior Resident Xnspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant II, USNRC r~ w)VU O 9504250267 94i23i PDR ADOCK 05000335I, PDR

~(s<

an FPL Group company

[

..9504250267 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 8<< 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-67, NPF-16 DOCKET NOS. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted By: Florida DHRS Repor t Prepar ed:WZ+8 Repor t Reviewed:

4 t,

N f

~ w ~

gh I 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 Ec 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program TABLE 1 Annual Summary, Deviations/Missing Data TABLE 1A Analyses with LLDs Above Table 4.12-1 TABLE 1B Detection Capabilities Land Use Census TABLE 2 Key to Sample Locations ATTACHMENT A Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power ATTACHMENT B and Light Company's St. Lucie Site First Quarter, 1994 Second Quarter, 1994 Third Quarter, 1994 Fourth Quarter, 1994 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison ATTACHMENT C Program, 1994 NP3:1/RAOENVOP.PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST ~ LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 5: 2 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9.1.8 of St.

Lucie Unit 1 and St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

II. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. ~Pur ose The purpose of the. radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

B. Pro ram Descri tion The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the St.

Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to the St. Lucie Unit 1 and St. Lucie Unit 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)

Control 3i4.12.1.

1. Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:
a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.
b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, measurements.

'ross beta, and gamma isotopic HP3:1/RAOENVOP.PSL

1 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 Sc 2

c. Surface water samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly respectively. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements. '.

Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.
f. Broad leaf vegetation samplescollected are collected from three locations. Samples are and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Analytical Responsibility:

Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS). Samples are collected and analyzed by HRS personnel. Samples are analyzed at the HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

C. Anal tical Results Table Annual i,~Summer Environmental provides Radicle a summary ical Monitorin for all specified

~pro ram samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.

Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively.

if any, are Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL (2)

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 R 2 D. Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census

~Summax No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.

No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20~ greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.

E. Interlaborator Com arison Pro ram The State of Florida HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory participates in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency. Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program are provided in Attachment C.

III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS Re ortin of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by the St. Lucie Plant, ODCM. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, Ra-228, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

NP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL (3)

4 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 B. Inter retation of Results Direct Radiation:

The results for direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

2 ~ Air Particulates/Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable I-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation. The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements which were made during the preoperational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

3. Surface Water:

The results for 'radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements.

Tritium was reported as present in one of the weekly samples collected from Site H-15 and one of the monthly samples collected at the control location, H-59. The highest concentration, which was at the control location, was less than 1% of the reporting level specified by the Off-Site Dose Calcuation Manual, Table 3.12-2 ~ No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected.

Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table l.

4. Waterborne Sediment and Food Products:

The results for radioactivity measurements in waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1 ~

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL (4)

f, 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2

5. Broad Leaf Vegetation:

The results for radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.

C. Conclusions The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased. The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St.

Lucie Units 1 8 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

HP3:1/RADEHVOP.PSL (5)

Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 E 2 , Docket No(s). 50-335 &. 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1994 (County, State)

PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: MICRO - R/hr Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower of Limit Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations Mean (f)

Range Name'ontrol Location with Highest Distance Direction Annual Mean Mean Range f b Locations Mean (f)b Range Exposure 5.00 (98/98) NW- 10 6. 39 (4/4) 5. 51 (4/4)

Rate, 102~ 4.33 6.53 10 mi., NW 6.22 6.53 5.29 5.70 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

4 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAT

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 E 2 , Docket No(s) . 50-335 &, 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1994 (County, State)

PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO Ci/M Location with Highest Limit All Indicator Type and Total Number of Analyses Lower of Detection'LLD)

Locations Mean (f)

Name'ean Distance Annual 6

Mean f b Control Locations Mean (f)b Performed Range Direction Range Range

"'I 258 0.024 <MDA <MDA Gross Beta, 258 0.0025 0.012 (201/206) H-08 0.014 (52/52) 0.011 (51/52) 0.003 0.078 6 mi., WNW 0.005 0.078 0.005 0.029 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20

'Be 0.0052 0.1132 (16/16) . H-34 0. 1242 (4/4) 0. 1058 (4/4) 0.0799 0.1659 20.5 N 0.0990 0 '571 0 '824 0.1418 210 pb 0.0120 (15/16) H-8 0. 01413 (4/4) 0. 0103 (4/4) 0.0055 0.0161 6 mi., WNW 0.0113 0.0161 0.0089 - 0.0120 134Cs 0.00069 <MDA <MDA 137Cs 0.00066 <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

T 1 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 , Docket No(s). 50-335 E 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 December 31 1994 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO Ci/LITER Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower of Limit Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations

. Mean (f)

Range Name'ontrol Location with Highest Distance Direction Annual Mean Mean Range f b Mean Locations Range (f)"

Tritium, 64 230 89 (1/52) H-15 89 (1/52) 92 (1/12)

<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE Gamma Isotopic, 64 60 240 (52/52) H-15 240 (52/52) 320 (12/12) 199 - 401 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 199 - 401 200 - 404 "Mn <MDA <MDA "Fe <MDA <MDA ssCo <MDA <MDA 60Co <MDA <MDA 6sZn <MDA <MDA "Zr-Nb <MDA <MDA 131 I <MDA <MDA 134Cs <MDA <MDA 137CS <MDA <MDA woBa-La <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3: 1/RADENVOP . PSL

t)

Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 6 2 , Docket No(s) . 50-335 & 50-389 .

Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1994 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, DRY Location with Highest Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Annual Mean f

Total Number of Locations Name Mean b Control Locations of Analyses Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Distance 6 Mean (f )

Performed Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 789 (2/2) H-15 789 (2/2) 548

-(2/2) 361 1217 <1 mi. ENE/E/ESE 361 1217 277 819

>>6Ra 330 (2/2) H-15 330 (2/2) 248 (2/2) 188 471 <1 mi. ENE/E/ESE 188 - 471 203 - 293 52 216 (1/2) H-15 216 (1/2) 107 (2/2)

<1 mi. ENE/E/ESE 68- 146 "Co <MDA <MDA 60Co 12 <MDA <MDA 134Cs 14 <MDA <MDA 137Cs 12 <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3: 1/RADENVOP . PSL

Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 , Docket No(s). 50-335 E 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1994 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Annual Mean f

To'tal Number of Locations Name Mean b Control Locations of Analyses Detection'LLD) Mean (f) Distance & Mean (f)

Performed Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 1293 (2/2) H-15 1293 (2/2) 1545 (2/2) 865 - 1721 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 865 1721 1340 1749 228Ra <MDA 172 (1/2) 226Ra <MDA 155 (1/2)

"Mn <MDA <MDA "Fe 16 <MDA <MDA 58Co <MDA <MDA 60Co 19 <MDA <MDA Zn 17 <MDA <MDA 4Cs <MDA <MDA 137Cs <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3: 1/RADENVOP . PSL

Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2 , Docket No(s) . 50-335 &, 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1994 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Type and To'tal Number of Analyses Lower of Limit Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations Mean (f)

Name'ean Distance Annual Mean f Control Locations Mean (f)

Performed Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 2044 (2/2) H-15 2044 (2/2) 2827 (2/2) 1912 2176 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 1912 2176 2706 - 2948 "Mn <MDA <MDA "Fe 16 <MDA <MDA Co <MDA <MDA 60Co 10 <MDA <MDA Zn 17 <MDA <MDA 134 Cs <MDA <MDA 137CS <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

Pa of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 E 2 , Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida , Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1994 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Type and To'tal Number of Analyses Lower of Limit Detection'LLD)

All Indicator Locations Mean (f)

Name'ean Annual Distance t Mean f b Control Locations Mean (f)

Performed Range Direction Range Range Gamma Isotopic, 36

'Be 71 665 (24/24) H-51 739 (12/12) 669 (12/12) 372 1228 1 mi ., N/NNW 372 1228 516 - 788 "K 100 2996 (24/24) H-52 3326 (12/12) 2647 (12/12) 2052 5042 1 mi., S/SSE 2312 - 5042 1339 - 4123 210 pb 566 (3/24) H-52 695 (1/12) <MDA 433 695 1 mi., S/SSE 131 z <MDA <MDA 134 Cs <MDA <MDA 3~Cs <MDA <MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2 TABLE 1 Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 5; 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida (County, State)

Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1994 NOTES

a. The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95-. probability with only 5'-. probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

LLDs in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

b. Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).
c. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.
d. Results are typically based upon the average net response of two TLDs. (Thermoluminescent dosimeters) .

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

J t

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 Ec 2 TABLE 1A Page 1 of 2 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Direct Exposure TLDs Location Date (Section 8 Approx Miles)

SW-2 12/7-93 3/15/94 SSW-10 12/7/93 - 3/15/94 SW-10 3/15/94 - 6/7/94 W-2 6/7/94 9/20/94 WSW-10 6/7/94 9/20/94 WNW-10 9/20/94 12/6/94 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous monitoring.

Description TLDs missing upong attempted collection.

of Problem:

Corrective Replaced missing TLDs.

Action:

B) Pathway: Airborne Particulates and Xodines Location: H-30, 2 miles W Date: 10/23/94 to 11/01/94 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous air sampling.

Description Power failure, sample duration of 121 hours0.0014 days <br />0.0336 hours <br />2.000661e-4 weeks <br />4.60405e-5 months <br /> o f Problem: out of the 145 hour0.00168 days <br />0.0403 hours <br />2.397487e-4 weeks <br />5.51725e-5 months <br /> sampling period.

Corrective Reestablished power upon discovery of outage.

Action:

HP3: 1/RADENVOP. PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 Zc 2 TABLE 1A Page 2 of 2 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA C) Pathway: Airborne Particulates E Iodines Location: H-14, 1 miles SE Date: 10/25/94 to 11/21/94 Deviation: Failure to provide continuous air sampling.

Description Extended power failure. Power failed approxi-o f Problem: mately 3 days into the 10/24/95 to 11/1/94

, sampling period and was not restored until about 2 days into the 11/16/94'o 11/21/94 sampling period.

Corrective Restarted air sampling equipment upon power Action: restoration.

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

I P 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2 TABLE 1B ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1/1/94 - 12/31/94 The values specified in Table 4.12-1, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

HP3: 1/RADENVOP. PSL

I 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 Ec 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS Distance to Nearest a b 5/94 Milk (c) 5/94 5/94 Sector Animal Residence Garden (d)

N 0 (e) 0 NE ENE ESE 0 SE 0 1.5/141 (g)

SSE L (f) 3.3/153 (g) L L 3.2/191 4.2/182 SSW 2.2/213 3.8/200 SW L 1.9/236 1.9/234 WSW 4.1/257 1.9/245 (}1) 1.9/253 4.5/263 1.9/260 2.1/275 L 2.3/281 2.6/290 3.5/304 L L (g)

HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

0 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 Ec 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS NOTES

a. All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the St.

Lucie Plant.

b. The following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles) /bearing (degrees)

For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 141 degrees is recorded as 1.5/141.

c. Potential milk animal locations. All locations specified have been verified to be not producing milk for human consumption.
d. Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.
e. 0 denotes that the sector area, is predominantly an ocean area.

L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.

g. Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:

SSE - Fire Station, 1.8/149 NNW - Lifeguard station at beach, 4.6/342 SE - Lifeguard station at beach, 1.1/132

h. Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 miles from the St. Lucie Plant.

HP3: 1/RADENVOP . PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 Sc 2 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

p wn I r- <<V Cf~

H 8'g:

8$ M Q

't5 k44'P(~I;,I.,I" S~e~ ~<<

wrr.

I m

<<s ~

dy,,

~

'aa 0 0 Sg, g'pcs P

~ Q

~ ~

o j((I 0 H t" n

~ ~ ~ Cp CO t9 n COO C00 p00 g O <<+0 I

~ ~~

Al 0 , *ir@is>,'(".." oo cO n v,((~>>i'iP'j l/SI((

ss

~ ~ MO .

~ QC0<< <<s Cf I

~ i<< 0 O I

0 III

~ ~

dg ~0 o

gag j sP(%'- 7 ~

d '4 ~cf p

~ ~<<

i!"  ;~$ f>- "-W~l( &Q I

gs 4)

CC( ss gp<<P s<<( ~

<<CO <<'sp ~s p pCOCO ~<<+ 0 0 kj

~ ~

c(s ce CO CK(

CO ~ &CD STATE ROAD A-(-A 0 I rs ~ "5~.g'" <

0>/AT 0<< CO <<s CK)

~ ~

COO 00 ss

~ D

<<OQ Os ~

s's\

C CO ps <<P 0 << ~

CO C+ s PP Wg.(VO WALf(SI AOCKS 00 ~s

~ <<PO CO ~ <<+0 )((. t

, <<(((Is ( W~ = V. (',AVi s'.<~'4f A~':=Is'~~sr -;i 4 (" ~~6(~4'. I CONTROLLED AREAj

".'.:!Ci(('!':.",;;: ATL(t(NOMICOCkAN "V

i (tr

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 k 2 H-32 10-MILES NW-10 Ft. PIERCE S-MILES ATLANTIC WNW-10 OCEAN H-08 2-MILES WNW-2 W-Xo ST. LUCIE W-2 H-30 M ~~NT WSW-2 SSW-2 SW-5 WSW 10 PORT S-5 WQV SSE-5 St. LUCZE SSW-5 SW-10 SSW-10 SE-10 S/SSE-10 S-10 a STUART St. Lucie Sampling locations H-12 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2 ATTACHMENT A Page 1 of 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion N-1 N A1A, North of Blind Creek NNW-5 NNW 5 South of Pete Stone Creek NNW-10 NNW 9 Coast Guard Station NW- 5 NW 6 Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.

NW- 10 NW 10 S.R. 68 at S.R. 607 WNW-2 WNW 3 'Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.

WNW- 5 WNW 5 U.S. 1 at S.R. 712 WNW- 10 WNW 10 S.R. 70, West of Turnpike

-2 W 2 7609 Indian River Drive 5 W 5 Oleander and Sager Street

-10 W 9 Interstate 95 at S.R. 709 WSW-2 WSW 2 8503 Indian River Dr.

WSW-5 WSW 5 Prima Vista at Yacht Club WSW-10 WSW 10 Del Rio at Davis Street SW-2 SW 2 9207 Indian River Drive SW-5 SW 5 U.S. 1 at Village Green Dr.

SW-10 SW 10 Port St. Lucie Blvd. at Cairo Rd.

SSW-2 SSW 3 10307 Indian River Drive SSW-5 SSW 6 U.S. 1 at Port St. Lucie Blvd.

SSW-10 SSW 8 Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.

S-5 S 5 13179 Indian River Drive S-10 S 10 U.S. 1 at S.RE 714 S/SSE-10 SSE 10 Indian River Dr. at Quail Run Lane SSE-5 SSE 5 Entrance to Nettles Island SSE-10 SSE 10 Elliot Museum SE-1 SE 1 South of Cooling Canal Control:

H-32 19 University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach HP3: 1/RADENVOP. PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 &, 2 ATTACHMENT A Page 2 of 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-08 WNW 6 FPL Substation, Weatherby Rd.

H-14 SE 1 On-Site, Near South Property Line H-30 W 2 Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive H-34 N 0.5 On-Site at Meteorology Tower Control:

12 FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart HP3: 1/RADENVOP. PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2 ATTACHMENT A

~

Page 3 of 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)

SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: H-15 WEEKLY, H-59 MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/SSE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island PLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT AMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/ESE Atlantic Ocean Public Beaches East Side AlA Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

It 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 5: 2 ATTACHMENT A.

Page 4 of 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/ESE Ocean Side, Vicinity of St. Lucie Plant Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island PLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION PLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion H-51 N/NNW Off-site Near North Property Line H-52 S/SSE Off-Site Near South Property Line Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island HP3: 1/RADENVOP . PSL

1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 6c 2 ATTACHMENT B 1994 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE REPORTS First Quarter, 1994 Second Quarter, 1994 Third Quarter, 1994 Fourth Quarter, 1994 HP3: 1/RADENVOP . PSL

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.'LUCIE SITE First Quarter, 1994 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1994 Collection Locations Number of Samle T e Fre enc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 25
2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*
3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 3*
4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 2'2 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.1 Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 191
  • Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit, of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 954 confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

DIREC RADIATION TLDs m cro-R hour Sample Deployment 12-07-93 Site Collection 03-15-94 N-1 4.98 + 0. 14 NNW-5 4.99 + 0.15 NNW-10 4.94 + 0.13 NW-5 5.02 + 0.15 NW-10 6.22 + 0.18 WNW-2 4.88 + 0.14 WNW-5 4.99 + 0.17 WNW-10 5;59 + 0.17 W-2 (A) 6.23 + 0.37 W-5 5.20 + 0.16 W-10 5.06 + 0.16 WSW-2 4.84 + 0.15 WSW-5 5.26 + 0.16 WSW-10 4 '3 + 0 '3 0 'SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 (B) 5.86 4.87 4.70

+

+

+

0.15 0.13 0.13 SSW-5 5.19 + 0.18 SSW-10 (B)

S-5 4.74 + 0.14 S-10 4.91 + 0.13 S/SSE-10 4.76 + 0.14 SSE-5 4.69 + 0.13 SSE-10 4.86 + 0.13 SE-1 4.62 + 0.14 H-32 5.36 + 0.16 (A) The empty holder for the dosimeter at site W-2 was found lying on the ground on 02-16-94. A new dosimeter was deployed here on 02-22-94 at a slightly different location in an attempt to reduce the frequency of vandalism being experienced here.

(B) The dosimeters for site SW-2 and site SSW-10 were missing when collection was attempted.

2.a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 01-04-94 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0 '2 ,<0.02 01-11-94 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 01-19-94 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 01-25-94 <0.01 <0 02

~ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 02-02-94 <0. 02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 02-08-94 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.02 <0.04 02-,16-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 02-22-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-01-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 03-07-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 03-14-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 03-21-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-28-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 0

Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 I

01-04-94 0. 005 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + 0. 002 0.011 + 0 '02 0.008 + 0.002 01-11-94 0 ~ 012 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.006 + 0. 002 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 01-19-94 0. 010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 01-25-94 0 ~ 078 + 0.004 0.013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.020 +

02-02-94 0. 007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 *0.009 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 + 0.002 0.003'.010 02-08-94 0. 012 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 *0.011 + 0.003 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.003 02-16-94 0 ~ 006 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 *0.009 + 0.002 0.016 + 0 '02 0.011 + 0.002 02-22-94 0 ~ 015 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 *0.007 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.003 0.007 + 0.002 03-01-94 0 ~ 013 + 0 '02 0.010 + 0 '02 0.008 + 0 '02 0 '09 + 0 '02 0.009 + 0.002 03-07-94 0 ~ 012 + 0 '02 0.015 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0 '02 0.014 + 0.002 03-14-94 0 ~ 012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0 '02 0.012 + 0.002 03-21-94 0. 016 + 0.002 0.020 + 0 '02 0.017 + 0 '02 0.016 + 0 '02 0.018 + 0.002 03-28-94 0. 015 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.014 + 0 '02 0.016 + 0.002 Means: 0.016 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.013 + 0 F 001 0.012 + 0.001

  • NRC split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci m3 First Quarter, 1994 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 A H08 0.1386 + 0.0102 <0. 0189 ,<0.0006 <0.0010 0 ~ 0145 + 0. 0031 H12 0. 1418 + 0.0103 <0.0189 <0.0007 <0.0009 0.0089 + 0.0033 H14 0. 1294 + 0.0090 <0.0182 <0.0007 <0.0005 0.0137 + 0.0033 H30 0.1659 + 0 '103 <0.0170 <0.0009 <0.0008 0.0141 + 0.0024 H34 0 ~ 1571 + 0.0095 <0.0201 <0.0008 <0.0007 0.0151 + 0.0030 (A) Pb-210 is a radionuclide which is often naturally present in air filter samples. Our gamma analyses in the past have often indicated the qualitative presence of Pb-210, but these results were not reported because accurate measurement was not possible due to the low-energy cutoff of the detector used. With the recent acquisition of a new detector, we are now better able to quantify the measurement of Pb-210, and, beginning with this group of samples, we will be reporting the Pb-210 results.

3.a SURFACE MATER Ci l I

Sample Collection Zr-95 =Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (B)

H15 01-05-94 <135 401 + 18 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 01-11-94 <134 259 + 43 <5 <5 <11 <7 <13 <5 <7 <5 <3 <7 01-19-94 <130 292 + 22 <2 <2 <4 <3 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 <4 01-26-94 <129 276 + 40 <4 <4 <12 <7 <10 <8 <5 <5 <4 <12 02-03-94 <131 234 + 42 <4 . <4 <11 <7 <10 <9 <7 <5 <4 <7 02-07-94 <131 335 + 48 <6 <4 <11 <6 <9 <8 <8 <5 <4 <9 02-16-94 <137 304 + 42 <4 <3 <9 <5 <7 <6 <4 <4 <4 <8 02-22-94 <137 288 + 31 <2 <3 <5 <4 <6 <4 <3 <3 <3 <6 03-02-94 03-08-94

<146

<135 303 206

+

+

44 34

<4

<3

<4

<4

<7

<9

<6

<5

<6'4

<7 <8

<4

<5

<4

<4

<6

<5 03-15-94 <134 313 + 36 <4 <5 <9 <5 <8 <6 <4 <5 <6 03-22-94 <134 119 + 34 <3 <4 <8 <4 <5 <6 <4 <4 <4 03-28-94 <133 338 + 36 <3 <3 <7 <5 <7 <4 <4 <4 <5 1

H59 01-05-94 <135 343 + 39 <4 <4 <7 <4 <4 <7 <7 <4 <5 <6 02-03-94 92 + 43 200 + 42 <4 <4 <6 <6 <10 <8 <8 <4 <5 <5 03-02-94 <135 320 + 29 <3 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 - <4 <3 <4 <5 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

0 3.b SEDIMENT Ci k dr wei ht Sample Collection I

.Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15* 02-07-94 <56 361 + 54 <6 <7 <7 <7 188 + 11 ND H59 02-09-94 <50 277 + 40 <7 <8 <8 <7 203 + 11 68 + 15

  • NRC split sample.

4.a.1 CRUSTACEA Blue Crab Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Ce-134 Ce-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 02-16-94 1721 + 249 <20 <25 <44 <37 <61 <34 <23 ND ND H59 02-08-94 1749 + 190 <21 <20 <39 <30 <45 <22 <28 ND 172 + 33 4.a.2 FISH H15: Shee shead H59: S anish Mackerel Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 02-07-94 2176 + 320 <24 <31 <50 <41 <74 <34 <37 ND ND H59 02-08-94 2948 + 242 <14 <18 <48 <29 <49 <26 <23 ND ND ND Non-detectable.

P I

0

4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION Man rove Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-4 0 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 01-05-94 372 + 50 2576 + 128 <13 <10 <10 02-03-94 745 + 57 2052 + 131 <9 <10 <8 03-02-94 803 + 61 2365 + 117 <10 <11 <9 H52 01-05-94 525 + 61 3612 + 165 <15 <13 <9 02-03-94 658 + 65 2891 + 167 <10 <11 <12 03-02-94 557 + 53 2312 + 130 <11 <10 <12 H59 01-05-94 569 + 54 2669 + 130 <13 <11 <10 02-03-94 653 + 57 2216 + 134 <10 <11 <11 03-02-94 788 + 70 2186 + 110 <9 <8 <9

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER 'AND LIGHT COMPANY '

ST. LUCIE SITE Second Quarter, 1994 Office of Radiation Control Flarida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1994 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc Sam led Sam les

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 26
2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*
3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0
4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1 Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 185
  • Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at. least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

DIRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R hour Sample Deployment 03-15-94 Site Collection 06-07-94 N-1 4.99 + 0.14 NNW-5 5.11 + 0.16

,NNW-10 4.97 + 0.15 NW-5 5.08 + 0.17 NW-10 6.44 + 0.17 WNW-2 4.98 + 0. 14

'5

~

WNW-5 4 + 0.14 WNW-10 5.51 + 0.16 W-2 5.61 + 0.18 W-5 5.08 + 0.14 W-10 5.08 + 0.14 WSW-2 5.09 + 0.17 WSW-5 4.94 + 0.15 WSW-10 4.41 + 0.15 SW-2 4.60 + 0.16 SW-5 5.95 + 0.18 SW-10 (A)

SSW-2 4.71 + 0.16 SSW-5 5.12 + 0.16 SSW-10 4.95 + 0.15 S-5 4.80 + 0.14 S-10 5.06 + 0.17 S/SSE-10 4.58 + 0.14 SSE-5 4.78 + 0.15 SSE-10 5.03 + 0.17 SE-1 4.43 + 0.14 H-32 5.69 + 0.15 (A) The dosimeter for site SW-10 was missing when collection was attempted.

2.a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date HOS H12 H14 H30 H34 04-05-94 <0.01 <0. <0. 01 <0.01 <0. 01 01'0.02 04-11-94 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0. 02 04-21-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 04-26-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-02-94 <0.02 <0.01 05-10-94

<0. 02

<0. 01

'0.01

<0.01

<0. 01

<0.01 <0.01 <0". 01 05-17-94 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0. 02 05-24-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 <0. 02 06-01-94 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 06-06-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 06-14-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 06-20-94 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 06-27-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 . H30 H34 04-05-94 0.047 + 0. 003 0.029 + 0.002 0. 023 + 0. 002 0.030 +,0.002 0.021 + 0-002 04-11-94 0.014 + 0. 002 0.010 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0. 016 + 0. 002 04-21-94 0.012 + 0. 002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 04-26-94 0.006 + 0. 002 <0.007 0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.003 05-02-94 0.015 + 0. 002 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0. 014 + 0. 002 05-10-94 0.023 + 0. 002 0.013 + 0.002 *0.018 + 0.002 0.021 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0. 002 05-17-94 0.023 + 0. 003 0.020 + 0.002 *0.017 + 0.002 0.025 + '0.003 0.020 + 0.002 05-24-94 0.016 + 0. 002 0.014 + 0.002 *0.017 + 0.003 0.021 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.003 06-01-94 0.023 + Q. 002 0.015 + 0.002 *0.018 + 0. 002 0. 017 + 0. 002 0. 013 + 0. 002 06-06-94 0.006 + Q. 003 0.007 + 0.003 0.006 + 0. 002 <0. 007 <0 .005 06-14-94 0.012 + Q. 002 0.009 + 0.002 0.014 + 0:002 0.014 + 0. 002 0. 013 + 0.002 06-20-94 0.005 + Q. 002 0.012 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 06-27-94 0.018 + 0. 002 0.017 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 Means: 0.017 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 0.016 + 0.001 0.014 + 0.001 NRC split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci m3 Second Quarter, 1994 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 H08 0.1203 + 0.0084 <0.0171 <0.0007 <0.0009 0.0161 + 0.0023 H12 0.1075 + 0.0096 <0.0183 <0.0010 <0.0009. 0.0096 + 0.0024 H14 0.1121 + 0.0115 <0.0167 <0.0010 <0.0008 0.0101 + 0.0026 H30 0.1051 + 0.0083 <0.0186 <0.0007 <0.0008 0.0128 + 0.0027 H34 0.1209 + 0.0095 <0.0161 <0.0010 <0.0005 0.0096 + 0.0028

3.a SURFACE WATER Ci l Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134- Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

H15 04-05-94 - <132 319 + 33 <4 <3 <9 <5 <8 <5 <6 <4 <5 04-12-94 89 + 42 280 + 32 <4 <4 <8 <6 <7 <7 <4 <4 <4 <5 04-21'-94 <130 310 + 39 <4 <3 <9 <5 <8 <8 . <5 <4 <4 <3 04-26-94 <136 327 + 36 <4 <3 <7 <5 <7 <6 -<5 <4 <4 <6 05-03-94 <140 286 + 32 <4 <4 <9 <5 <8 <7 <4 <5 <4 <8 05-09-94 <138 352 + 35 <3 <4 <7 <6 <9 <8 <5 <4 <4 <6 05-17-94 <137 333 + 36 <3 <4 <8 <5 <9 <6 <8 <4 <4 <6 05-24-94 . <137 373 + 34 <4 <4 <8 <5 <8 <6 <4 <4 <4 <8 05-31-94 <137 340 + 37 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <6 <4 <4 <7 06-07-94 <138 334 + 35 <3 <5 <5 <9 <5 <5 <4 <4 <6 06-13-94 <138 353 + 36 <4 <3 <7 <4 <9 <6 <4 <5 <4 <7 06-21-94 <142 347 + 35 <4 <4 <6 <4 <5 <6 <4 <4 <4 <8 06-27-94 <142 339 + 37 <4 <4 <9 <4 <9 <5 <4 <3 <4 <9 H59 04-12-94 <132 404 + 34 <3 <4 <7 <5 <9 <6 <5 <3 <4 <6 05-03-94 <140 326 + 33 <3 <4 <6 <5 <7 <6 <4 <4 <3 <8 06-01-94 <138 248 + 40 <4 <4 <7 <4 <8 <8 <6 <3 <4 <3 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

0 I

BROADLEAF VEGETATION Man rove Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 H51 04-12-94 710 + 57 2445 + 118 <8 <9 <10 ND 05-03-94 538 + 59 2860 + 120 <8 <8 <6 ND 06-01-94 488 + 35 2150 + 89 <6 <7 <7 433 + 192 H52 04-12-94 673 + 61 3359 + 151 <11 <12 <12 ND 05-03-94 662 + 67 3867 + 155 <10 695 + 286 06-01-94 421 + 44 3587 + 144 <10 <10 <9 ND H59 04-12-94 588 + 47 1339 + 93 <8 <9 <9 ND 05-03-94 516 + 50 1506 + 89 <8 <7 <8 ND 06-01-94 656 + 47 3074 + 121 <9 <8 <7 ND ND Non-detectable.

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S

,ST. LUCIE SITE Third Quarter, 1994 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

ST. LUCZE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter,.1994 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc Sam led Sam les

1. Direct. Radiation Quarterly 27 25
2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*
3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 3*
4. Ingestion 4'.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l 'Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.1 Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 191
  • Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes .that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at. least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

DIRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R hour Sample Deployment 06-07-94 Site Collection 09-20-94 N-1 4.83 + 0.13 NNW-5 4.86 + 0.15 NNW-10 4.78 + 0.12 NW-5 4.85 + 0.16 NW-10 6.53 + 0.19 WNW-2 4.82 + 0.14 WNW-5 4.77 + 0.15 WNW-10 5.51 + 0.17 W-2 (A)

W-5 4.92 + 0.16 W-10 4.89 + 0.15 WSW-2 4.78 + 0.15 WSW-5'SW-10 5.00 + 0.15 (A)

SW-2 4.49 + 0.12 SW-5 5.59 + 0.16 SW-10 4.84 + 0.15 SSW-2 4.64 + 0.16 SSW-5 5.00 + 0.15 SSW-10 5.04 + 0.13 S-5 4.62 + 0.13 S-10 4.83 + 0.16 S/SSE-10 4.51 + 0.13 SSE-5 4.60 + 0.12 SSE-10 4.78 + 0.13 SE-1 4.44 + 0.13 H-32 5.70 + 0.15 (A) The dosimeters for sites W-2 and WSW-10 were missing when collection was attempted.

r A

0 e

2.a IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 07-05-94 <0. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 07-12-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 07-19-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 07-26-94 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-04-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-12-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 , <0.01 08-17-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0,02 <0.02 08-26-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 08-30-94 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0. 02 09-06-94 <0'. 01 <0.01 <0.01 <0. 01 <0.01 09-13-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 09-20-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 09-28-94 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 07-05-94 0.011 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0. 012 + 0. 002 0.010 + p .002 0. 013 + 0. 002 07-12-94 0.011 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.011 + Q .002 0. 014 + 0. 002 07-19-94 0.020 +,0.002 0.022 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.013 + p .002 0.022 + 0.003 07-26-94 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.008 + Q .002 0.006 + 0.002 08-04-94 0.011 + 0.002 0. 011 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + Q .002 0.009 + 0. 002 08-12-94 0.008 + 0.002 0. 006 + 0.002 *0.004 + 0.001 0.004 + p .001 0.007 + 0. 001 08-17-94 0.011 + 0.002 . 0.008 + 0.002 *0.011 + 0.002 <0 .007 0.009 + 0.002 08-26-94 0.009 + 0.002 0. 007 + 0.001 *0.006 + 0.002 0.009 + p .002 0.008 + 0.002 08-30-94 0.007 + 0.003 0. 012 + 0.003 0.014 + 0.003 0.006 + Q .003 0.008 + 0.002 09-06-94 0.008 + 0.002 0. 007 + 0. 002 0.007 + 0.002 0. 008 + Q .002 0. 009 + 0. 002 09-13-94 0.008 + 0.002 0.006* + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0. 006 + p .002 0.010 + 0.002 09-20-94 0.014 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0. 015 + p .002 0.011 + 0.002 09-28-94 0.009 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0. 009 + p .002 0.010 + 0.002 Means: 0.011 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.009 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 NRC split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci m3 Third Quarter, 1994 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 H08 0.0799 + 0.0102 <0.0140 <0.0010 <0.0007 0.0146 + 0.0021 H12 0.0916 + 0.0097 <0.0159 <0.0008 <0.0007 0.0120 + 0.0029 H14 0.0824 + 0.0083 <0.0141 <0.0005 <0.0005 0.0106 + 0.0024 H30 0.0844 + 0.0089 <0.0181 <0.0009 <0.0006 0.0081 + 0.0025 H34 0.0990 + 0.0082 <0.0111 <0.0006 <0.0007 0.0055 + 0.0024

r 3.a SURFACE WATER Ci l Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

H15 07-06-94 <140 316 + 31 <3 <3 <7 <4 <6 <6 <3 <3 <3 <7 07-13-94 <139 339 + 34 <3 <3 <7 <4 <9 <5 <4 <4 <4 <9 07-19-94 <138 301 + 30 <3 <3 <5 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <3 <4 07-27-94 <152 335 + 33 <4 <3 <6 <4 <7 <5 <4 <4 <4 <8, 08-04-94 <132 326 + 34 <3 <3 <7 <5 <8 <6 <5 <3 <3 <7 08-12-94 <132 322 + 36 <3 <4 <6 <5 <6 <7 <5 <3 <4 <5 08-18-94 <134 316 + 32 <4 <4 <7 <4 <7 <6 <4 <3 <4 <8 08-26-94 <134 339 + 35 <3 <3 <8 <5 <9 <6 <5 <4 <3 <6 08-31-94 <134 291 + 33 <3 <4 <6 <5 <8 <7 <4 <4 <4 <9 09-07-94 <131 326 + 36 <4 <4 <8 <5 <8 <8 <6 <4 <3 <4 09-14-94 <131 328 + 38 <4 <4 <7 <5 <7 <6 <5 <4 <4 <10 09-21-94 <138 385 + 26 <2 <3 <5 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <3 <7 09-28-94 <138 330 + 38 <4 <4 <8 <5 <7 . <7 <6 <4 <4 <4 H59 07-06-94 <140 339 + 14 <1 <1 <3 <2 <3 <2 <2 <1 <2 08-04-94 <132 349 + 35 <4 <4 <5 <4 <9 <6 <5 <4 <4 <4 09-07-94 <131 336 + 35 <3 <4 <7 <5 <10 <8 <7 <4 <4 <5 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

1 3.b SEDIMENT Ci k dr wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15* 08-18-94 <93 1217 + 83 <9 <10 <12 <11 471 + 11 216 + 17 H59 08-18-94 <81 819 + 76 <7 <10 <10 <10 293 + 10 146 + 16

  • NRC split sample.

4.a.l CRUSTACEA Blue Crab Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 08-31-94 865 + 150 <20 <17 <38 <26 <38 <22 <16 ND ND H59 09-06-94 1340 + 184 <16 <19 <38 <21 <38 <20 <18 155 + 17 ND 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 08-18-94 1912 + 172 <14 <20 <36 <23 <39 <16 <18 ND ND H59 09-07-94 2706 + 263 <23 <26 <51 <29 <50 <29 <26 ND ND ND Non-detectable.

I 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION Man rove Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-.134 Cs-137 H51 "

07-06-94 721 + 59 3474 + 141 <10 <9 <9 08-04-94 621 + 46 3093 + 113 <7 <8 (7 09-06-94 1228 + 86 3008 + 169 <13 <13 <12 H52 07-06-94 518 + 81 5042 + 198 <13 <13 <14 08-04-94 646 + 55 3883 + 148 <10 .<11 <8 09-06-94 615 + 62 2394 + 133 <11 <13 <11 H59 07-06-94 772 + 62 2587 + 128 <10 <11 <11 08-04-94 644 + 48 4123 + 133 <8 <10 <9 09-07-94 778 + 65 2502 + 134 <12 <12 <12

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE Fourth Quarter, 1994 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

ST. LUCXE SXTE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1994 Collection Locations- Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 26
2. Airborne 2.a Air Xodines Weekly 63 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 67*
3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0
4. Xngestion 4.a Fish and Xnvertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 181
  • Xncludes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 954 confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

DIRECT RADIATION TLDs micro-R hour Sample Deployment, 09-20-94 Site Collection 12-06-94 N-1 4 ~ 94 + 0.17 NNW-5 4.69 + 0.16 NNW-10 4 '5 + 0.17 NW-5 NW-10 4 '6 6.35

+

+

0.15 0.19 WNW-2 4.83 + 0.15 WNW-5 4.88 + 0.15 WNW-10 (A)

W-2 (B) 5 '3 + 0.17 W-5 W-10 '.97 5.14 +

+

0.15 0.14 WSW-2 4.85 + 0.15 WSW-5 4.96 + 0.17 WSW-10 4.20 + 0.16 SW-2 4 ~ 69 + 0.14 SW-5 5.52 + 0.16 SW-10 4.74 + 0.17 SSW-2 4.72 + 0.18 SSW-5 5.08 + 0.18 SSW-10 5.19 + 0.16 S-5 4.75 + 0.15 S-10 5.00 + 0.17 S/SSE-10 4.52 + 0.17 SSE-5 (C) 4.65 + 0.15 SSE-10 4.80 + 0.16 SE-1 4.44 + 0.14 H-32 5.29 + 0.16 (A) The dosimeter for site WNW-10 was missing when collection was attempted.

(B) The packaging for the dosimeter at site W-2 was found to have been opened.

(C) The dosimeter at site SSE-5 was placed at a slightly different location at the beginning of this sampling interval to allow easier access.

I i ~

2.a IODINE-131 IN MEEKLY AIR FILTERS Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 10-03-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 10-10-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 10-20-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 10-25-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 r

11-01-94 <0. 01 <0.01 <0. 03 (A) <0. 02 (B) <0. 01 11-07-94 <0. 01 <0.01 (C) <0. 01 <0.01 11-16-94 <0: 03 <0.03 (C) <0.03'- <0.04 11-21-94 <0. 02 <0.02 <0. 02 (D) <0. 01 <0.02 11-28-94 <0. 04 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 12-05-94 <0. 02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 12-13-94 <0. 02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 12-20-94 <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 12-27-94 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 (A) Electrical power was out at, the end of this sample. The equipment is estimated to have run for 82 hours9.490741e-4 days <br />0.0228 hours <br />1.35582e-4 weeks <br />3.1201e-5 months <br /> out of the 145 total hours for this sampling interval.

(B) Electrical power was out at the end of this sample. The equipment is estimated to have run for 121 hours0.0014 days <br />0.0336 hours <br />2.000661e-4 weeks <br />4.60405e-5 months <br /> out of the 145 total hours for this sampling interval.

(C) Electrical power was out for this entire sampling interval.

There were no samples for analysis.

(D) Electrical power was out at the start of this sample. The equipment is estimated to have'un for 75 hours8.680556e-4 days <br />0.0208 hours <br />1.240079e-4 weeks <br />2.85375e-5 months <br /> out of the 119 total hours for this sampling interval.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA Ci m3 Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 10-03-94 0.007 + 0.002. 0.010 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 10-10-94 0. 009 + 0. 002 0.010 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 10-20-94 0. 013 + 0. 002 0.009 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.002 10-25-94 0. 017 + 0. 003 0.023 + 0.003 0.019 + 0.003 0.019 + 0.003 0.023 + 0.003 11-01-94 0. 017 + 0.002 0.009 + 0. 002 (A0.013 + 0.003 (B0.016 + 0.003 0.005 + 0.002 11-07-94 0-016 + 0.002 0.014 + 0. 002 (C) 0.015 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 11-16-94 0.005 + 0. 001 0.006 + 0. 001 (C) 0.007 + 0.001 0.004 + 0.001 11-21-94 0.009 + 0. 002 0.008 + 0.002 *(D)<0.010 0.004 + 0.002 <0.006 11-28-94 0.015 + 0. 002 0.012 + 0.002 *0.012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 12-05-94 0. 009 + 0. 002 0.008 + 0.002 *0.003 + 0.001 0.006 + 0.002 + 0.002 12-13-94 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 *0.007 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 12-20-94 0.011 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002'.007 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 12-27-94 0.015 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.017 + 0.002 Means: 0.012 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001

  • NRC split samples.

(A) Electrical power was out at the end of this sample. The equipment is estimated to have run for 82 hours out of the 145 total hours for this sampling interval.

(B) Electrical power was out at the end of this sample. The equipment is estimated to have run for 121 hours out of the 145 total hours for this sampling interval.

(C) Electrical power was out for this entire sampling interval. There were no samples for analysis.

(D) Electrical power was out at the start of this sample. The equipment. is estimated to have run for 75 hours8.680556e-4 days <br />0.0208 hours <br />1.240079e-4 weeks <br />2.85375e-5 months <br /> out of the- 119 total hours for this sampling interval.

I J 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF UARTERLY COMPOSITES Ci m3 Fourth Quarter, 1994 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 H08 0. 1044 + 0. 0091 <0.0206 <0.0011 <0.0007 0. 0113 + 0. 0030 H12 0.0824 + 0.0085 <0.0174 <0.0007 <0.0009 0.0108 + 0.0030 H14 0.0999 + 0.0138 <0.0241 <0.0011 <0.0012 ND H30 0.0917 + 0.0097 <0.0182 <0.0010 <0.0007 0.0118 + 0.0021 H34 0.1197 + 0.0117 <0.0197 <0.0006 <0.0008 0.0126 + 0.0019 ND Non-detectable.

3.a SURFACE WATER Ci l Zr-95 t Ba-140 Sample Collection Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

H15 10-03-94 <134 400 + 33 <4 <4 <7 <5 <9 <8 <7 <5 <4 <7 10-11-94 <134 379 + 39 <4 <4 <7 <4 <10 <7 <4 <5 <3 <5 10-21-94 <134 269 + 37 <2 <4 <9 <4 <9 <6 <6 <4 <4 <5 10-26-94 <134 330 + 34 <4 <3 <6 <4 <7 <7 '<4 <4 <3 <9 11-01-94 <138 287 + 33 <2 <3 <8 <5 <9 <7 <5 <4 <4 <7 11-08-94 <137 336 + 36 <4 <4 <8 <3 <8 <6 <4 <4 <4 <5 11-17-94 <137 372 + 37 <3 <5 <7 <5 <7 <7 <12 <4 <4 <6 11-22-94 <142 274 + 34 <3 <4 <9 <3 <10 <7 <8 <4 <4 <5 11-29-94 <140 199 + 32 <4 <3 <7 <5 <8 <5 <5 <4 <5 <7 12-06-94 <141 281 + 35 <4 <3 <7 <4 <9 <6 <5 <4 <4 <8 12-13-94 <136 268 + 33 <4 <4 <8 <4 <9 <8 <6 <4 <3 <6 12-19-94 <136 272 + 36 <4 <4 <7 <3 <7 <7 <5 <4 <4 <6 12-27-94 <137 290 + 18 <2 <2 <3 <2 <4 <3 <2 <2 <2 <3 H59 10-04-94 <134 347 + 37 <3 <4 <7 <5 <8 <7 <8 <5 <4 <4 11-07-94 <154 303 + 32 <4 <4 <6 <3 <8 <5 <4 <4 <4 <6 12-07-94 <14'1 319 + 32 <3 <4 <6 <4 <7 <7 <6 <4 <3 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

4.b. 1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION Man rove Ci k wet wei ht Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 H51 10-04-94 1141 + 70 3634 + 145 <8 ND 11-08-94 885 + 55 2796 + 112 <8 <7 <8 569 + 235 12-07-94 615 + 73 2745 + 129 <9 <9 ND H52 10-04-94 611 + 56 2460 + 119 <9 <9 <9 ND 11-08-94 639 + 52 2806 + 120 <8 <7 <9 ND 12-07-94 573 '+ 51 2495 + 119 <8 <9 <9 ND H59 10-04-94 758 + 58 3126 + 118 <8 <8 <8 ND 11-07-94 711 + 48 3037 + 127 <9 <10 <10 ND 12-07-94 599 + 79 3400 + 160 <12 <10 ND ND Non-detectable.

~ P ~ /

'I ~

~

4 1994 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNITS 1 Ec 2 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1994 HP3:1/RADENVOP.PSL

FLORIDA DEPT. OF HRS EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1994 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level WATER Alpha 01 28 94 15 pCi/L 0.591 16.33 0.46 WATER Beta 01 28 94 62 pCi/L 0.354 65.00 0.52 WATER . Co-60 06 10 94 50 pCi/L 0 '54 50.33 0.12 WATER Zn-65 06 10 94 134 pCi/L 0.091 145.00 1.47 WATER RU-106 06 10 94 252 pCi/L 0.213 196.00 -3.88 1 WATER Ba-133 06 10 94 98 pCi/L 0.059 83.33 -2. 54

~

WATER Cs-134 06 10 94 40 pCi/L 0.236 37.67 -0.81 WATER Cs-137 06 10 94 49 pCi/L 0.118 54.33 1,85 WATER H-3 03 04 94 4936 pCi/L 0.005 4957.67 0.08 WATER I-131 02 04 . 94 119 pCi/L 0.148 115.00 -0.58 WATER Sr-89 01 14 94 25 pCi/L 0.591 20 00 -1.73 F

WATER Sr-90 01 14 94 15 pCi/L 0 '54 11.67 -1.15 NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Range Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. O. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981 N.D.K.: deviation of the mean 'ormalized from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

ACTION LEVEL:

Cause: Problem with Ruthenium-106 standard.

Corrective Action: See attached letter from Dr. George Dilbeck.

I A

~~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

~< og>t4 ENVIRONMENTALMONITORING SYSTEMS LABORATORY LAS VEGAS P.O. BOX 93478 LAS VEGAS. NEVADA 89193 3478 I702/798 2100 FTS 545.2100)

~

Dear Participant:

The Radiation Quality Assurance Program has been experiencing problems

-vith the 'Ruthenium-106 currently used in the Performance Evaluation (PE) Studies and in the Standards Distribution Program. If these problems can be satisfactorily resolved, this analyte vill once again be placed into this PE Study. If the problems cannot be resolved, the Ruthenium-106 vill be replaced.

Formal vritten notice vill be given to all participants that are enrolled 'in the Gamma in Mater PE Study before the Ruthenium-106 is reintroduced or replaced. At that time', nev calibration standards vill be available to all participants in the Gamma. in Mater PE Study.

Sincerely, George Dilbeck Chemist Performance Evaluation Program Radioanalysis Branch (RSA-RADQA)'

g< ~ v s 0

'I FLORXDA DEPT. OF HRS EPA XNTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1994 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FXLTER Alpha 08 26 94 35 pCi/F 0.000 37.00 0.38 FXLTER Beta 08 26 94 56 pCi/F 0.000 61.00 0.87, FXLTER Cs-137 08 26 94 15 pCi/F 0.000 16.00 0.35 FXLTER Sr-90 08 '26 94 20 pCi/F 0.118 17.33 -0.92 MXLK X-131 09 30 94 75 pCi/L 0.148 73.33 -0.36 MXLK- Cs-137 09 30 94 59 pCi/L 0.118 62.67 1.27 MXLK K 09 30 94 1715 mg/L'Ci/L 0.220 1726,00 0;22 MXLK Sr-89 09 30 94 25 0 F 000 22.00 -1. 04 MXLK Sr-90 09 30 94 15 pCi/L 0.000 15.00 0.00 WATER Alpha 07 22 94 32 pCi/L 0.517 45 00 F F 81 WATER Alpha 10 28 94 57 pCi/L 0.253 61.67 0.58 WATER Beta 07 22 94 10 pci/L 0.000 15.00 1.73 HATER Beta 10 28 94 23 pCi/L 0.000 30.00 2.42 WATER Co-60 11 04 94 59 pCi/L 0.118 60.67 0.58 WATER Zn-65 11 04 94 100 pCi/L 0.236 108.33 1.44 WATER Ba-133 11 04 94 73 pCi/L 0.338 66.00 1 ~ 73 WATER Cs-134 11 04 94 24 pCi/L 0.236 23.00 -0.35 WATER WATER Cs-137 H-3 ll 08 05 04 94 94 49 9951 pCi/L pCi/L 0.118 0.149 53.67 9985.33 1.62 0.06 HATER X-131 10 07 94 79 pCi/L 0.222 77.33 -0.36 WATER Sr-89 07 15 94 30 pCi/L 0.591 30.67 0.23 HATER Sr-90 07 15 94 20 pCi/L 0.236 20.00 0.00 NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Range Radioactivity Laboratory Xntercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. 0. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N. D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided'o data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegan

l (i

+L c~ t~

,a 0