ML17241A362
ML17241A362 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Saint Lucie ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/31/1998 |
From: | FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17241A361 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 9906150167 | |
Download: ML17241A362 (7) | |
Text
t 1998 t
ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 L 2 ATTACHMENTC RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1998 990bi50ib7 990b07 PDR ADOCK 05000335, 8
~ ~
I
~
FLORXDA DEPT.
OF HEALTH - EPA XNTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1998 WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Alpha Beta H-3 I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-133 Media Nuclide Collection Mon Day Yr 01 30 98 01 30 98 03 13 98 02 06 98 01 16 98 01 16 98 06 05 98 06 05 98 06 05 98 06 05 98 06 05 98 EPA Known 30.5 3.9 2155 104.9 8
32 12 104 31 35 40 Units pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pci/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Normal.
Range 0.241 0.071 0.144 0.146 0.000 0.118 0.118 0.295 0.000 0.118 0.354 Mean of Analyses 9.77 7.30 2066.33 103.97 6.00 27.33 12.33 112.00 29.00 37.67 37.00 N.D.K. Action Level
-4.73 1
1.18
-0.44
-0.15
-0.69
-1.62 0.12 1.39
-0.69 0.92
-1.04 NOTES:
Normal.:
Normalized range:
As. defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.
S. Environmental Protection Agency,. P.
O.
Box 93478, Las Vegas,
- Nevada, 89193-3478.
'PA-600/4-81-004,
- February, 1981.
N.D.K.:
Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.
NDP:
NA:
No data provided.
No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.
,Not available.
Report containing th's data has not yet been r'eceived from EPA, Las Vegas.
ACTION LEVEL:
(1) Cause:
No cause for the low result can be found.
However, the graph of 4 responding labs vs. nornamlized deviaton of the mean from the known value given on page 9
of EPA's report for this cross-check (copy attached) shows most laboratories reported a value lower than the known value.
Furthermore, the second graph on page 9,
responding labs vs. normalized deviation of the mean from the grand average, shows that the laboratories agree fairly well with each other.
Action: None at this time.
~
I ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Gross Alpha-Beta in Water, 30- Jan-1998
- 9. 16 Gross Alpha Data sorted by Laboratory Average Avera e
Ta Lab Avera e
Ta Lab Avera e
Ta Lab 23.23 23.37 23.63 23.73 23.77 23.83 24.37 24.73 24.77 24.87 25.07 25.37 25.37 25.53 25.60 25.67 25.80 JM JS RZ AZ BH SD XM T
BA AW D
SL BM BS QU 26.00 26.10 26.10 26.23
.26.27 26.33 26.50 26.77 27.03 27.03 27.27 27.33 27.40 27.53 27.90 28.20 28.57 DO 0
QZ C
QW VH AL 29.60 29.67
- 5.77 29.67 29.77 30.33 30.47 30.53 31.17 31.57 31.60 33.00 30 23 3".17 3~ 73 42.30 4o.00 QP K
CA J
ZQ CJ AU XN WN SG fc responding labs IO Frequency distribution 0
-6 d
.2 0
+2 id Normalized deviation of the mean.'rom the known value fc responding labs 10 Frequency distribu:>on
-6
-4
.2 0
'+2 id Normalized deviation ofthe 'mean from the grand average i6
~
I
~
No data submitted TAG SQG3OLS A
=- Above control hnut
e 1998 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT-UNITS 1 & 2 DOE-QAP 48 RESULTS No.
Test Radionuclide Reported Reported Value Error EML Value EML
~Re orled Error EML Evaluation Matrix: Al Air Filter Bq/filter GROSS BETA MN54 CO57 CO60 SB125 CS134 CS137 CE144 Matrix: WA Water Bq/I H3 MN54 CO60 CS137 2.300 5.950 10.180 8.960 11.100 17.100 12.700 7.700 240.100 63.500 15.000 51.500 0.040 1.960 0.300 0.080 5.44 0.485 0.040 11.110 0.846 0.070 9.090 0.732 0.300 12.160 1.151 0.100 19.740 1.380 0.100 11.860 0.957 0.100 8.210 0.796 4.800 218.300 6.505 0.600 57.000 1.900 0.300 13.600 1.200 0.600 46.000 1.700 1.173 1.094 0.916 0.986 0.913 0.866 1.071 0.938 1.100 1.114 1.103 1.120 A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A Matrix: VE Vegetation Bq/kg K40 CO60 CS137 Matrix: SO Soil Bq/kg 757.000 11.100 186.000 10.000 0.500 1.000 707.500 24.987 10.575 0.206 181.500 7.141 1.070 1.050 1.025 A
A A
K40 CS137 313.000 325.000 6.000 313.500 10.150 1.000 329.500 9.260 0.998 0.986 A
A Evaluation: A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, N = Not Acceptable
t J
/
~
F
~
~
1998 ANNUALRADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALOPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 8 2 DOE-QAP 49 RESULTS No.
Test Radionuclide Reported Reported EML Value Error Value EML
~Re orled Error EML Evaluation Matrix: Al AirFilter Bq/filter GROSS BETA MN54 CO60 SB125 CS137 Matrix: WA Water Bq/I H3 MN54 CO60 NI63 CS137 2.080 5.250 8.630 7.300 23.830 84.080 36.400 51.300 95.230 52.700 0.070 2.160 0.050 4.920 0.050 9.160 0.200 8.890 0.100 22.470 3.100 76.200 0.500 32.400 0.400 49.400 0.670 95.700 0.600 50.000 0.070 0.400 0.580 0.550 1.030 2.900 1.400 1.200 0.900 1.700 0.963 1.067 0.942 0.821 1.061 1.103 1.123 1.038 0.995 1.054 A
A A
W A
A A
A A
A Matrix: VE Vegetation Bq/kg 1
K40 499.000 1
CO60 20.200 1
CS137 402.000 9.000 460.000 20.000 0.500 20.000 1.000 2.000 390.000 20.000 1.085 1.010 1.031 A
A A
Matrix: SO Soil Bq/kg 1
K40 1
CS137 332.00 945.000 6.000 314.000 13.000 2.000 954.000 38.000 1.057 0.991 A
A Evaluation: A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warnin, N = Not Acceptable
'a
\\
I c
C