Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
|---|
TAC:ME8160, Eliminate Use of Term Core Alterations in Actions and Notes (Withdrawn, Closed) TAC:ME8161, Eliminate Use of Term Core Alterations in Actions and Notes (Withdrawn, Closed) TAC:ME8162, Eliminate Use of Term Core Alterations in Actions and Notes (Withdrawn, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARML12076A0452012-03-0808 March 2012
Request for Amendment to Eliminate the Use of the Term Core Alteration in the Technical Specifications
Project stage: Request
ML1213103802012-05-10010 May 2012
Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Revision 3
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML12248A1502012-09-0404 September 2012
E-mail Draft Request for Additional Information, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Revision 3
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML12250A7202012-09-11011 September 2012
Request for Additional Information, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Revision 3
Project stage: RAI
ML12286A3302012-10-11011 October 2012
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Eliminate the Use of the Term Core Alteration in the Technical Specifications
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML12341A1292012-12-0505 December 2012
E-mail, Draft Request for Additional Information, Round 2, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev. 3 (TAC ME8160/ME8162)
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML12347A0402012-12-19019 December 2012
Request for Additional Information, Round 2, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev. 3 (TAC ME8160-ME8162)
Project stage: RAI
NUREG-1432, Request for Additional Information, Round 3, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev. 3 (TAC ME8160-ME8162)2013-01-0303 January 2013
Request for Additional Information, Round 3, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev. 3 (TAC ME8160-ME8162)
Project stage: RAI
ML13039A0132013-01-31031 January 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Eliminate the Use of the Term Core Alteration in the Technical Specifications
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML13072A1822013-03-13013 March 2013
Email, Draft Request for Additional Information, Round 4, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev. 3 (TAC ME8160-ME8162)
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML13127A2432013-05-0808 May 2013
5/29/13 Meeting Via Conference Call with Arizona Public Service Company to Discuss Palo Verde Request to Revise Technical Specifications; Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev 3 (TAC ME8160-ME81
Project stage: Meeting
ML13150A0812013-06-0303 June 2013
Request for Additional Information, Round 4, Request to Revise Technical Specifications to Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev. 3
Project stage: RAI
ML13154A4502013-06-26026 June 2013
Summary of Meeting Via Conference Call with Arizona Public Service Co. to Discuss Palo Verde Request to Revise Technical Specifications; Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev 3 (TAC ME8160-ME816
Project stage: Meeting
ML13210A2382013-07-25025 July 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Eliminate the Use of the Term Core Alteration in the Technical Specifications
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML14051A1032014-02-13013 February 2014
Withdrawal of Request for Amendment to Eliminate the Use of the Term Core Aleration in the Technical Specifications
Project stage: Request
NUREG-1432, FRN - Withdrawal of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications; Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev 32014-03-0707 March 2014
FRN - Withdrawal of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications; Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev 3
Project stage: Withdrawal
ML14059A1782014-03-0707 March 2014
Withdrawal of License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications; Eliminate Use of the Term Core Alteration Consistent w/TSTF-471 and NUREG-1432, Rev 3
Project stage: Withdrawal
2013-01-03
[Table View] |
Text
From: Singal, Balwant Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:42 AM To: russell.stroud@aps.com Cc: 'Thomas.N.Weber@aps.com'
Subject:
Acceptance of Application - License Amendment Request to Eliminate the Use of the Term CORE ALTERATIONS in the Technical Specifications (TACs ME8160, ME8161, and ME8162)
By letter dated March 8, 2012, Arizona Public Service Company (APS) submitted an amendment request for approval of the License Amendment Request to eliminate the use of term CORE ALTERATIONS throughout the Technical Specifications for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. APS stated that the proposed amendment incorporates changes reflected in Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler 471-A, Revision 1.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed alternative in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Balwant K. Singal Senior Project Manager (Comanche Peak, STP, and Palo Verde)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Balwant.Singal@nrc.gov Tel: (301) 415-3016 Fax: (301) 415-1222
