ML081770060

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) and Bases Amendment, TS and Bases 3.7.8, Nuclear Service Water System, Response to Request for Additional Information
ML081770060
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/2008
From: Morris J
Duke Energy Carolinas
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML081770060 (16)


Text

JAMES R. MORRIS, VICE PRESIDENT PDuke dEnergy Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Catawba Nuclear Station Carolinas 4800 Concord Road / CN01 VP York, SC 29745 803-701-4251 803-701-3221 fax June 23, 2008 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke)

Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Numbers 50-413 and 50-414.

Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) and Bases Amendment TS and Bases 3.7.8, Nuclear Service Water System (NSWS)

Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)

References:

Letters from Duke to NRC dated July 30, 2007 and May 27, 2008 The July 30, 2007 reference letter requested to modify the subject TS and Bases to allow single supply header operation of the NSWS (Duke designation "RN") for a time period of 35 days. The request was made to facilitate future maintenance of the NSWS supply headers. The May 27, 2008 reference letter provided responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) associated with this issue.

On June 4, 2008, a telephone conference call was held among representatives of Duke and the NRC concerning the subject amendment request. Based on the results of this conference call, Duke is hereby modifying the amendment request to:

1) Revise the proposed TS Completion Time governing single supply header operation from 35 days to 30 days, and,
2) Include additional specificity in the proposed TS and Bases regarding the conditions under which the. 30-day TS Completion Time will be applied.

xccw www. duke-energy.com

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 June 23, 2008 The revised proposed TS'and Bases pages are included in the attachment to this letter.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter or its attachment.

The conclusions reached in the original determination that the amendment request contains No Significant Hazards Considerations pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92, and the basis for the categorical exclusion from performing an Environmental Assessment/Impact Statement pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(c) (9),

have not been. changed based on the revisions in the attachment to this letter.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91, a copy of this letter and its attachment is being sent to the appropriate State of South Carolina official.

/

Inquiries on this matter should be directed to L.J. Rudy at.

(803) 701-3084.

Very truly yours, James R. Morris LJR/s Attachment

'ii

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 June 23, 2008 James R. Morris affirms that he is the person who subscribed his name to the foregoing statement, and that all the matters and facts set forth herein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.

Ja -R*. Morris,. Vice President JamRN '

Subscribed and sworn to me:

Date NotZaryubi ic My commission expires: 7-/o- P0/ -

Date SEAL

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 4 June 23, 2008 xc (with attachment):

L.A. Reyes U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regional Administrator, Region II Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 A.T. Sabisch Senior Resident Inspector (CNS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Catawba Nuclear Station J.F. Stang, Jr. (addressee only)

NRC Senior Project Manager (CNS)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 8-G9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 S.E. Jenkins Section Manager Division of Waste Management South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull St.

Columbia, SC 29201

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 5 June 23, 2008 bxc (with attachment):

R.D. Hart (CN01RC)

L.J. Rudy (CN01RC)

T.L. Edwards (CN03SP)

R.L. Gill, Jr. (EC050)

NCMPA-1 NCEMC PMPA SREC Document Control File 801.01 RGC File ELL-EC050

ATTACHMENT REVISED PROPOSED TS AND BASES PAGES

NSWS 3.7.8 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS 3.7.8 Nuclear Service Water System (NSWS)

LCO 3.7.8 Two NSWS trains shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One NSWS train A.1 --------- NOTES------

inoperable. 1. Enter applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.8.1, "AC Sources-Operating," for emergency diesel generator made inoperable by NSWS.

2. Enter applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.4.6, "RCS Loops-MODE 4," for residual heat removal loops made inoperable by NSWS.

Restore NSWS train to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> OPERABLE status.

(continued)

Catawba Units 1 and 2 3.7.8-1 Amendment Nos.

NSWS 3.7.8 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. -------- NOTES------ B.1 Restore NSWS supply 30 days

1. Entry into this header to OPERABLE Condition shall only status.

be allowed for pre-planned activities as described in the Bases of this Specification.

2. Immediately enter Condition A of this LCO if one or more NSWS components become inoperable while in this Condition and one NSWS train remains OPERABLE.
3. Immediately enter LCO 3.0.3 if one or more NSWS components become inoperable while in this Condition and no NSWS train remains OPERABLE.

One NSWS supply header inoperable due to NSWS being aligned for single supply header operation.

C. Required Action and C.1 Be in MODE 3. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> associated Completion Time of Condition A or B AND not met.

C.2 Be in MODE 5. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> Catawba Units 1 and 2 3.7.8-2 Amendment Nos.

NSWS 3.7.8 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.8.1 ----------------------- NOTE ---------------

Isolation of NSWS flow to individual components does not render the NSWS inoperable.

Verify each NSWS manual, power operated, and 31 days automatic valve in the flow path servicing safety related equipment, that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in the correct position.

SR 3.7.8.2 --------------------- NOTE ------------------

Not required to be met for valves that are maintained in position to support NSWS single supply header operation.

Verify each NSWS automatic valve in the flow path that 18 months is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to the correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal.

SR 3.7.8.3 Verify each NSWS pump starts automatically on an 18 months actual or simulated actuation signal.

Catawba Units 1 and 2 3.7.8-3 Amendment Nos.

NSWS B 3.7.8 B 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS B 3.7.8 Nuclear Service Water System (NSWS)

BASES BACKGROUND The NSWS, including Lake Wylie and the Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond (SNSWP), provides a heat sink for the removal of process and operating heat from safety related components during a Design Basis Accident (DBA) or transient. During normal operation, and a normal shutdown, the NSWS also provides this function for various safety related and nonsafety related components. The safety related function is covered by this LCO.

The NSWS consists of two independent loops (A and B). of essential equipment, each of which is shared between .units. Each loop contains two NSWS pumps, each of which is supplied from a separate emergency diesel generator. Each set of two pumps supplies two trains (1A and 2A, or 1 B and 2B) of essential equipment through common discharge piping.

While the pumps are unit designated, i.e., 1A, 1 B, 2A, 2B, all pumps receive automatic start signals from asafety injection or blackout signal from either unit. Therefore, a pump designated to one unit will supply post accident dooling to equipment in that loop on both units, provided its associated emergency diesel generator is available. For example, the 1A NSWS pump, supplied by emergency diesel 1A, will supply post accident cooling to NSWS trains 1A and 2A.

One NSWS loop containing two OPERABLE NSWS pumps has sufficient capacity to supply post loss of coolant accident (LOCA) loads on one unit and shutdown and cooldown loads on the other unit. Thus, the OPERABILITY of two NSWS loops assures that no single failure will keep the system from performing the required safety function.

Additionally, one NSWS loop containing one OPERABLE NSWS pump has sufficient capacity to maintain one unit indefinitely in MODE 5 (commencing 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.following a trip from RTP) while supplying the post LOCA loads of the other unit. Thus, after a unit has been placed in MODE 5, only one NSWS pump and its associated emergency diesel generator are required to be OPERABLE on each loop, in order for the system to be capable of performing its required safety function, including single failure considerations.

Additional information about the design and operation of the NSWS, along with a list of the components served, is presented in the UFSAR, Section 9.2.1 (Ref. 1). The principal safety related function of the NSWS is the removal of decay heat from the reactor via the CCW System.

Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.8-1 Revision No. 1

NSWS B 3.7.8 BASES APPLICABLE The design basis of the NSWS is for one NSWS train, in conjunction SAFETY ANALYSES with the CCW System and a containment spray system, to remove core decay heat. following a design basis LOCA as discussed in the UFSAR, Section 6.2 (Ref. 2). This prevents the containment sump fluid from increasing in temperature during the recirculation phase following a LOCA and provides for a gradual reduction in the temperature of this fluid as it is supplied to the Reactor Coolant System by the ECCS pumps.

The NSWS is designed to perform its function with a single failure of any active component, assuming the loss of offsite power.

The NSWS, in conjunction with the CCW System, also cools the unit from residual heat removal (RHR), as discussed in the UFSAR, Section 5.4 (Ref. 3), from RHR entry conditions to MODE 5 during normal and post accident operations. The time required for this evolution is a function of the number of CCW and RHR System trains that are operating. Thirty six hours after a trip from RTP, one NSWS train is sufficient to remove decay heat during subsequent operations in MODES 5 and 6. This assumes a maximum NSWS temperature, a simultaneous design basis event on the other unit, and the loss of offsite power.

The NSWS satisfies Criterion 3 of 10 CER 50.36 (Ref. 4).

LCO Two NSWS trains are required to be OPERABLE to provide the required redundancy to ensure that the system functions to remove post accident heat loads, assuming that the worst case single active failure occurs coincident with the loss of offsite power..

While the NSWS is operating in the normal dual supply header alignment, an NSWS train is considered OPERABLE during -MODES 1, 2,

,3, and 4 when:

a. 1. Both NSWS pumps on the NSWS loop are OPERABLE; or
2. One unit's NSWS pump is OPERABLE and one unit's flowpath to the non essential header, AFW pumps, and Containment Spray heat exchangers are isolated (or equivalent flow restrictions); and
b. The associated piping, valves, and instrumentation and controls required to perform the safety related function are OPERABLE.

Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.8-2 Revision No. 1

NSWS B 3.7.8 BASES LCO (continued)

While the NSWS is operating in the single supply header alignment, one of the supply headers is removed from service in support of planned maintenance or modification activities associated with the supply header that is taken out of service. In this configuration, each NSWS train is considered OPERABLE with the required 'NSWS flow to safety related equipment being fed through the remaining OPERABLE NSWS supply header. While the NSWS is operating in the.single supply header alignment, an NSWS train is considered OPERABLE during MODES 1,2, 3, and 4 when:

a. The associated train related NSWS pumps are OPERABLE; and
b. The associated piping (except for the supply header that is taken Out of service), valves, and instrumentation and controls required to perform the safety related function are OPERABLE.

The NSWS system is shared between the two units. The shared portions of the system must be OPERABLE for each unit when that unit is in the MODE of Applicability. Additionally, both normal and emergency power for shared components must also be OPERABLE. If a shared NSWS component becomes inoperable, or normal or emergency power to shared components becomes inoperable, then the Required Actions of this LCO must be entered independently for each unit that is in the MODE of applicability of the LCO, except as noted in a.2 above for operation in the normal dual supply header alignment. In this case, sufficient flow is available, however, this configuration results in inoperabilities within other required systems on one unit and the associated Required Actions must be entered. Use of a NSWS pump and associated diesel generator on a shutdown unit to support continued operation (> 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />) of a unit with an inoperable NSWS pump is prohibited.

APPLICABILITY In MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, the NSWS is a normally operating system that is required to support the OPERABILITY of the equipment serviced by the NSWS and required to be OPERABLE in these MODES.

In MODES 5 and 6, the requirements of the NSWS are determined by the systems it supports.

Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.8-3 Revision No. 2

NSWS B 3.7.8 BASES ACTIONS A.1 If one NSWS train is inoperable, action must be taken to restore OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. In this Condition, the remaining OPERABLE NSWS train is adequate to perform the heat removal function. However, the overall reliability is reduced because a single failure in the OPERABLE NSWS train could result in loss of NSWS function. Due to the shared nature of the NSWS, both units are required to enter a 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Action when a NSWS Train becomes inoperable on either unit. Required Action A.1 is modified by two Notes. The first Note indicates that the applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.8.1, "AC Sources-Operating," should be entered if an inoperable NSWS train results in an inoperable emergency diesel generator. The second Note indicates that the applicable Conditions and Required Actions of LCO 3.4.6, "RCS Loops-MODE 4," should be entered if an inoperable NSWS train results in an inoperable decay heat removal train (RHR). An example of when these Notes should be applied is with both units' loop 'A' NSWS pumps inoperable, both units' 'A' emergency diesel generators and both units' 'A' RHR systems should be declared inoperable and appropriate Actions entered. This is an exception to LCO 3.0.6 and ensures the proper actions are taken for these components. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time is based on the redundant capabilities afforded by the OPERABLE train, and the low probability of'a DBA occurring during this time period.

B. 1 If one NSWS supply header is inoperable due to the NSWS being aligned for single supply header operation, the NSWS supply header must be restored to OPERABLE status within 30 days. Dual supply header operation is the normal alignment of the NSWS. The Completion Time of 30 days is supported by probabilistic risk analysis. While in Condition B, the single supply header is adequate to perform the heat removal function for all required safety related equipment for both safety trains.

Due to the shared nature of the NSWS, both units are required to enter this Condition when the NSWS is aligned for single supply header operation. In order to prevent the potential for NSWS pump runout, the single NSWS pump flow balance alignment is prohibited while the NSWS is aligned for single supply header operation.

Catawba Units 1 and 2 .B 3.7.8-4 Revision No. 2

NSWS B 3.7.8 BASES ACTIONS (continued)

Condition B is modified by three Notes. Note 1 .states that entry into this Condition shall only be allowed for pre-planned activities as described in the Bases of this Specification. Condition B is only allowed to be entered in support of planned maintenance or modification activities associated with the supply header that is taken out of service. An example of a situation for which entry into this Condition is allowed is refurbishment of a supply header. Entry into this Condition is not allowed in response to unplanned events or for other events involving the NSWS. Examples of situations for which entry into this Condition is prohibited are emergent repair of discovered piping leaks and other component failures. For unplanned events or other events involving the NSWS, Condition A must be entered. Note 2 requires immediate entry into Condition A of this LCO if one or more NSWS components become inoperable while in this Condition and, one NSWS train remains OPERABLE. With one remaining OPERABLE NSWS train, the NSWS can still perform its safety related function. However, with one inoperable NSWS train, the NSWS cannot be assured of performing its safety related function in the event of a single failure of another NSWS component. The most limiting single failure is the failure of an NSWS pit toautomatically transfer from Lake Wylie to the SNSWP during a seismic event. While the loss of any NSWS component subject to the requirements of this LCO can result in the entry into Condition A, the most common example is the inoperability of an NSWS pump. This occurs during periodic testing of the emergency diesel generators. Inoperability of an emergency diesel generator renders its associated NSWS pump inoperable. Note 3 requires immediate entry into LCO 3.0.3 if one or more NSWS components become inoperable while in this Condition and no NSWS train remains OPERABLE. In this case, the NSWS cannot perform its safety related function.

C.1 and C.2 If the NSWS train cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time, or if the NSWS supply header cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time, the unit must be placed in a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.

The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner.and without challenging unit systems.

Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.8-5 Revision No. 2

NSWS B 3.7.8 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.8.1 REQUIREMENTS This SR is modified by a Note indicating that the isolation of the NSWS components or systems may render those components inoperable, but does not affect the OPERABILITY of the NSWS.

Verifying the correct alignment for manual, power operated, and automatic valves in the NSWS flow path provides assurance that the proper flow paths exist for NSWS operation. This SR does not apply to valves that are locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, since they are verified to be in the correct position prior to.being locked, sealed, or secured. This SR does not require any testing or valve manipulation; rather, it involves verification that those valves capable of being mispositioned'are in the correct position. This SR does not apply to valves that cannot be inadvertently misaligned, such as check valves.

The 31 day Frequency is based on engineering judgment, is consistent with the procedural controls governing valve operation, and ensures correct valve positions.

SR 3.7.8.2 This SR verifies proper automatic operation of the NSWS valves on an actual or simulated actuation signal. The signals that cause the actuation are from Safety Injection and Phase 'B' isolation. The NSWS is a normally operating system that cannot be fully actuated as part of normal testing. This Surveillance is not required for valves that are locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in the required position under administrative controls. The 18 month Frequency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a unit outage and the potential for an unplanned transient if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power. 'Operating experience has shown that these, components usually pass the Surveillance when performed at the r 18 month Frequency. Therefore, the Frequency is acceptable from a reliability standpoint.

This SR is modified by a Note that states that the SR is not required to be met for valves that are maintained in position to support NSWS single supply header operation. When the NSWS is placed in this alignment, certain automatic valves in the system are maintained in position and will' not automatically reposition in response to an actuation signal while the NSWS is in this alignment.

Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.8-6 Revision No. 0

NSWS B 3.7.8 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SR 3.7.8.3 This SR verifies proper automatic operation of the NSWS pumps on an actual or simulated actuation signal. The signals that cause the actuation are from Safety Injection and Loss of Offsite Power. The NSWS is a normally operating system that cannot be fully actuated as part of normal testing during normal operation. The 18 month Frequency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a unit outage and the potential for an unplanned transient if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power. Operating experience has shown that these components usually pass the Surveillance when performed at the 18 month Frequency. Therefore, the Frequency is acceptable from a reliability standpoint.

REFERENCES 1. UFSAR, Section 9.2.

2. UFSAR, Section 6.2.
3. UFSAR, Section 5.4.
4. 10 CFR 50.36, Technical Specifications, (c)(2)(ii).

Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.8-7 Revision No. 0