ML043360041
| ML043360041 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/30/2004 |
| From: | Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML043360041 (32) | |
Text
0 Z
rn n
n m
0
-I 2
rn z
n v) cn
PSEG N LLC status I Definition Attendance for Safety Conscious Work Environment (SCWE) Training - PSEG SCWE MANAGEMENT TRAINING ATTENDANCE Updated: Monthly Nuclear Management.
Chart Owner Nuclear Training Manager Goal: 43 associates by year end History Intent of Metric Nuclear provides a significant amount of Waining on a broad range of subjects. This metric measures the trainingl to enhance management's understanding of key Safety Conscious Work Envlronment (SCWE) policy attributes amd our collective roles and responsibilities for proper implementation. This is a full day o training1 Analysis and Actions New Indicator for 20W Safety Conscious Work Environment training for management is scheduled to be completed by the end of January 2005 175 150 125 Goal Attended 100
- -Remaining to Attend 75
-Expected 50 to Enroll 12 3 --___I___.
Sept M Sept 27 Septa Oet 12 Oct 18 Oct 19 Oct25 Novl Nova Nov12, Nov29 Dec6 Decl3 3
-~
PSEG Nuclear. LLC I SeDtember2004 I status I Definitlon Executive Review Board (ERE) reviews EXECUTIVE REVIEW BOARD (ERB) ACTION proposed personnel actions to ensure no Updated: Monthly retaliation or chilling effect implications.
APPROVALS Chart Owner Safety Conscious Work Environment Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend
.History I Intent of Metric The Executive Review Board (ERB) was establishedto ensure that no adverse amon IS taken or perceived to be taken against site personnel for raising nuclear safety issues. This Board reviews significant proposed discipline, promotions, transfers and terminahons for PSEG employees and supplemental (contract) personnel.
New Indicator for 2004 1 -
A nalvsis and Actions The ERB process was initiated in April, with a follow-up letter sent to all supplemental (contractor; personnel vendors in July. As expected, initial approvals were low, however, the approval rate has significantly improved as management has become more knowledgeable and experienced in the process.
20 15 - ~~
11 mTotal Cases u) 10 3 Reporting I data entty 8 m
LT w 0 Approved 5 Cases 5 4 0
0 I I I I ,
Jan Feb Mar APr Msy Jun Jul Aug Oct Nov Dec 4
EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM (ECP) - The number of Employee Concerns Program OECP) concerns filed anonym1 CONCERNS CONFIDENTIALITY / ANONYMITY Updated: Monthly I confidentially versus total number of concerns per month. Chart does not inc I REQUEST NRC 30-day requests.
Chart Owner
- ~
Employee Concerns Program Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend an atemate means to have issues addressed outside of line management.
Analysis and Actions During the current year, there have been twenty-seven concerns (non-NRC referred) brought 1 the attention of the Employee Concerns Program. Four were submitted anoriymousiy or with specific request for confiidentiality. A review of the concerns indicates no adverse trend.
I I
2003 0 Confidentiality Requested shonymous .Total Number of Concerns 10 I
I 8 ln 7 a Monthly Total e Confidentiality /
0 5 6 Anonymously 4
! 4 rn Monthly Total 2 4 n Number of s
z Concerns 2
0 Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec 5
PSEG N C I SeDtember2004 I Status I Defim it ion Total notifications generated on a monthly basis TOTAL NOTIFICATIONS GENERATED Updated: Monthly Corrective Action Program Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend History Intent of Metric Site personnel write a notfication in our Corrective Action Program (CAP)to identny an issue that needs attention. This metric illustrates the total number of notifications written each month by site 1 personnel. We are monitoring to be sure the volume of issues is consistent with expected trends, based on our own past performance as well as industry pecspective.
1,679 1,411 m
m Analysis and Actions f lorn This performance indicator identified a normal increase.seenduring the spring refueling outage t% -
period. Subsequent monthly data shows a return to typical nohoutage levels.
500 B
s o 3,000 2,750 2,500 2,339 2,190 2,250 E
- . 2,000 1,916 1,837 1,740 Monthty
$z 1,750 Total 1 1,500 E
l-1,250 1,000 750 500 I I I Jan Feb Mar APr Msy Jun Jul hug SeP Oct Nov Dec 6
Total Open 2 - r h l h ) W W h P . r . n uIor.nov)or.noLno 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jun-14 Jun-21 Jun-28 Jul-05 Jul-12 Jul-19 Jul-26 hug-02 Rug-09 hug-I6 m
Aug-23 Aug-30 SepO6 Segl3 Sep20 I
Oct- 11 Oct-18 Oct-25 Nw-01 NoY-08 NOY-15 NOY-22 NoY-29 Dec-06 Dec-I 3 Dec-20 Dec-27 r I
ONLINE ELECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG Updated Monthly Chart Owner I Salem Maintenance Manager and Hope Creek Maintenance Manager Goal: 1900 by year end1 History Intent of Metric This metric measures our total backlog of on-line electwe maintenance. These are items thatpo NOT have an impact on plant operations and can be fixed while the unlt is in sewce. Benchmarking indicates the industry median at 1450, with tmp performance at 1200 for our sne. Our goal is to achieve top performance by the end of 2005 Historical Data Not Available Analysis and Actions This indicator is on target to meet the year-end goal 2,750 I 2,500 2,250 E33s1 2,000 Actual 1,750 e 0s2 1,500 Actual 0"
e m 1,250 I- I HC 1,000 Actual 750
-CY Goal 500 250 n
8
PSEG Nuclear, LLC Septembet 2004 status I Definition The percent of corrective action closures I
determined to be acceptable by Corrective Actior CORRECTIVE ACTION PROBLEM RESOLUTION Updated. Monthly Closure Board review,based on the problem resolution cniteria. The performance indicator is a monthly value.
Chart Owner 95%
reworked and the Board approves Analysis and Actions New indicator for 2004 Improvement has been achieved in the quality and completeness of correcbve action closures.
This indicator is trending to achieve the 95% acceptance goal L
IOG?? -I 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95% 95%
90%
80% - 550 V
70% - 450 0
5 nGoal 60% - Reporting I E 50% - data e n t y 350 E 0 -Actual 40% -
starts in
. March 250 Ez 30% - 150 Number Reviewed 20% -
50 10% -
0% I T -50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee
____.-.....___I__--
9
PSEG N LC I September 2004 I Status I Definition Percentage of Nuclear Condmon Report acwties overdue on a NUCLEAR CONDITION REPORT ACTIVITIES OVERDUE Updated: Monthly monthly basis, measured as a m e s wth an actual finish date occurring after the due date Chart Owner I
Corrective Action Program Manager Goal: 5%
History Intent of Metric Ste personnelwte a notification in our Correctwe Action Program (CAP) to identrfy an issue that needs attenbon This metric tracks the timeliness of our review and corrective actions, measuring the percentage overdue,with a goal of less than or equal to 5%
New Indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions The number of nuclear condition report actwbes overdue has not improved This was expected because we chose to concentrate on CAP quality first, which has improved, and we will now begin focusing on CAP timeliness as part of a methodical process improvement strategy 25%
20%
(D mMonthly
< 15%
Overdue d
?n 11%
g 10% *Goal 2
n 5%
0%
Jan . Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec 10
PSEG Nuclear. LLC I September 2004 1 Status The number of due date extensions OPEN NUCLEAR CONDITION REPORT Updated Monthly appmved for open Nuclear Condibon Report evaluations EVALUATIONS WITH DUE DATE EXTENSIONS Chart Owner I I Corrective Action Program Manager I I
Goal: No Adverse Trend needs attention This metnc looks at the timeliness of our revlew and corrective actions by tracking the number that have a due date extension, which ISallowed by our process. By tracktng those that are extended,we expect to see an improvement trend in overall timeliness Analysis and Actions New Indicator for 2004 The trend for this indicator has not improved. This was expected because we chose to concentrate on CAP qualityfirst, which has improved, and we will now begin focusing on CAP timeliness as part of a methodical process improvement strategy.
I 100 I 89 90 - 85 80 -
E 70 -
P E 00-Monthly Total 1 40 Reporting / data entry starts in May I 20 -
10 -
0 I I I Jan Feb Mar AP~ May Jun Jul Aw SeP 0ct Nov Dec
PSEG Nuclear, LLC I September 2004 status I Definition The number of repeat maintenance issue:
identified on safety related equipment.
SALEM UNIT IREPEAT MAINTENANCE ISSUES Updated: Monthly Chart Owner Corrective Action Program Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend History I . Intent of Metric This metnc monitors the number of issues that were not fixed correctly the first time on safety-related equipment. We track items that have been fixed and need to be reworked within twelve months. This is a new metric to ensure we see a reduction as our corrective action program improves.
New Indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions Review of the data forthe past quarter does not indicate an adverse trend. Analysis of the specific component challenges reported as repeat maintenance indicates that vafve issues are the largest contributor. A reviewwill be performed and corrective actions will be issued if required.
30 ~~
25 25 b) v)
-% 20 0
c 16 Monthly 5E 15- Actual 12 3.- Reporting I data entry starts in July I
E 10-a" 5-0 I , , I I I I I Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jut Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec 12
PSEG Nuclear, LLC The number of repeat maintenance issue!
identified on safety related equipment SALEM UNIT 2 REPEAT MAINTENANCE ISSUES Updated: Monthiy Corrective Action Program Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend History Intent of Metric This metric monitors the number of issues that were not f m d correctly the first time on safety-relatec equipment. We track items that have been fixed and need to be reworked within twelve months Thi:
is a new metric to ensure we see a reduction as our corrective action program improves New Indicator for 2004 AnaJysis and Actions Review of the data for the past quarter does not indicate an adverse trend. Analysis of the specific component challenges reported as repeat maintenance indicates that valve issues are the largest contributor. A review will be performed and corrective actions will be issued if required.
30 25 u) 21 m 20
-2 20 m
0 c
cu Monthly 15 Actual 2 Reporting I data entry starts in July c
g 10 m
E 5
0 1 I I I I I I Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug Sw Oct Nov Dec 13
he number of repeat maintenance issues kntified on safety related equipment.
HOPE CREEK REPEAT MAINTENANCE ISSUES Updated: Monthly Chart Owner Corrective Action Program Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend History Intent of Metric This metric monitors the number of issues that were not fixed correctly the first hme on safely-related equipment. We track items that have been fixed and need to be reworked within twelve months This is a new metric to ensure we see a reduction as our corrective action program improves New Indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions Review of the data for the past quarter does not indicate an adverse trend. Analysis of the specific component challenges reported as repeat mantenance indicates no specific component trends evident.
I 30 25 In a
-I m
20 c Monthly 15 Actual 5
I Reporting I data entry starts in July g, 10 B
5 0 I I I I Jan Feb Mar APr MW Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 14
PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 status I Definfilon The number of plant operational issues that warrant implementationof the Operational SALEM UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Updated: Monthly Challenges ResponseTeam.
Chart Owner Salem Plant Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend History Intent of Metric We establisheda procedure to allow our operabng crews to request addmonal assistance to address emergent issues These are called 'Operational Challenges". This metric measures the number of tirr each month our operators engage this assistance Our goal ISto minimize the challenges to our opera crews By tracking and reviewngthe challenges, we can investigate common causes and potenhal tre Analysis and Actions New Indicator for 2004 Two operational challenges were experienced year to date. The first involved a challenge to performance of station battery testing within the required frequency. The second challenge was common to both Salem Units 1 and 2 and consisted of reconfiguration of the control room air conditioning system. In both cases the events were reviewed and appropriate corrective actions were taken. No adverse trends were identified.
I 10 B
8 7
8 Monthly 5 Total 4
Reporting/ data enty 3 starts in April 2
1 0 0 0 0 0
Jan F6b Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 15
SALEM UNIT 2 OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Updated Monthly Salem Plant Manager Goal: No Adverse Trend We established a procedure to allow our operating crews to request additional assistance to address emergent issues. These are called 'Operational Challenges'. This metric measures the number of times each month our operators engage this assistance. Our goal is to minimize the challenges to our operating crews. By tracking and rwiewing the challenges,we can investigate common causes and potential trends Analysis and Actions New Indicator for 2004 Sixoperational challenges were experienced year to date. Equipment issues caused four of the challenges and were comected by repairs and or design improvements. The fifth challenge invoked the cleanup of chemical residue. m e leak was elimtnated and residue removed. The final challenge was common to both Salem Units 1 and 2 and consisted of reconfiguration of the control room air conditioning system. In all cases, the events were reviewed and appropriate corrective actions were taken. No adverse trends were identified.
10 9 -
8 -
Fl 7-u) m m
6 6-5
- 5 - Monthly
.-B c
t 4 - I 0" Reporting / data entry 3 - starts in April I J 2 -
1 -
0 0 ,
14
PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 status Definition The number of plant operational issues that warrant implementabonof the Operahonal HOPE CREEK OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Updated. Monthly Challenges Response Team Chart Owner Hope Creek Plant Manager I Goal: No Adverse Trend I Intent of Metric We established a procedure to allow our operating crews to request additional assistance to address emergent issues. These are called Operational Challengesu This metric measures the number of times each month our operators engage this assistance. Our goal is to minimize the challenges to our operating cravs. By tracking and reviewingthe challenges,we can investigate common causes and potentialtrends Analysis and Actions New Indicator for 2004 Six operanonal challenge; were experienced year to date. Four challenges involved equipment deficiencies that were corrected by replacement or repair. One challenge involved instabillty of the transmission line, and the remaining challenge was due to diesel maintenance. Although a trend has been established, the events were reviewed and appropriate corrective actions were taken.
10 9-a-
? -
In m
07
- 6-Monthly Total U
3- Reporting I data entry starts in April 2-1-
0 0 0 0-l I 17
History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) called Technical Specifications Certain rules require operators to enter a shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unn shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entnes made at Salem Unt 1, compared to the expected number at top performing nuclear units (less than or equal to 2lmonth)
Historical Data Not Available 10 8
0 Good I
mMonthly Shutdown LCOS
'C L
3 0
6 3 *Monthly U
Shutdown
-$n. 4 LCOS Goal 3
2 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
--____--_-- I.____
18
Speclfication Lirnliing Conditions of Operation SALEM UNIT 1 UNPLANNED NONSHUTDOWN (LCOs) entered dunng the month.
LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO) Updated Monthly ENTRIES Chart Owner Salem System Engineering Manager Goal: 6 per Month History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Cornmission (NRC) called Technical Specifications. Certain rules require operators to enter a non-shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entries made at Salem Unt 1, compared to the expected number at top performing nuclear units (less than or equal to Blmonth)
Analysis and Actions Historical Data Not Available ---
The unfavorable performance in May was primarily due to monitoring and instrumentation'issues.
A muiti-year capital improvement project is underway to upgrade the monitors. Nuclear instrumentation issues were addressed during the refuel outage.
20 18 16 c7 Monthly Non -
Shutdown LCOS
+-Monthly Non -
A
- 2 I\
15
- 7% - '. n Shutdown LCOs Goal 4
5 5 5 4 5 2 1 3 2 0 I 1 I I , I ! I I 1 1
19
I .
The number of Unplanned LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO) Updated Monthly I
Salem System Engineering Manager Goal: 2 per Month History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) called Technical Speclfications. Certain rules requlre operators to enter a shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of bme. or unit shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entries made at Salem Unit 2 , compared to the expected number at tOF I performing nuclear units (less than or equal to Zmonth)
I Historical Data Not Available Analysis and Actions 10 8
0- Good
=Monthly 8 Shutdown LCOS 4 -r?rMonthty Shutdown LCOs Goal 2
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aw SeP Oct NOY Dec 20
DefInlt Ion he number of Unplanned Non-Shutdown SALEM UNIT 2 UNPLANNED NON-SHUTDOWN 'schnical Specification Limiting Conditions of
)peration (LCOs) entered during the month.
LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO) Updated. Monthly ENTRIES Chart Owner Salem System Engineering Manager Goal: 6 per Month I
History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commissio (NRC) called Technical Specifications Certain rules require operators to enter a non-shutdown LCO.
meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entnes made at Salem Unit 2 , compared to the expected number at t c performing nuclear unts (less than or equal t o Blmonth)
Analysis and Actions Historical Data Not Available Unplanned Nonshutdown Entries are meeting the goal 20 15 l8 1 0 Good 0 Monthly Non -
-k? 1 4 -
5 Shutdown
'C 12- LCOs 0
10-B -Y+ Monthly 8 -
-P Non -
5 5 - h u u a
., L L I L, L, s Shutdown LCOs Goal 4 -
2 - 1 5 1 6 1 5 1 0 ' I 2 I I I I I I , 2 I I l a 1 Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jut Aug S9P Oct Nov Dec
I The number of UnplannedShutdown Technical Specification Limiting Conditionsof Operation(LCOs)
EnterEdduring the month.
Updated Monthly Chart Owner Hope Creek System Engineering Manager Goal: 2 per Month j History Intent of Metric:
Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) caled Technical Specifications Certain rules require operators to enter a shutdown LCO. meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown ISrequired This metric I measures the unplanned entries made at Hope Creek, compared to the expected number at top performin!
I nuclear units (less than or equal to Zmonth)
Analysis and Actions I
Historical Data Not Available Challenges with the s m c e water system were the primary cause of this metric being above goal. A multi-year capital improvement project for the sewce water system is being developed 0 Good
-Monthly Shutdown LCOs
+Monthly Shutdown LCOs Goal Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Sep Oct Nov Dec 22
PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 status DefInItIon The number dUhplanned Non-ShuldownTechnical HOPE CREEK UNPLANNED NONSHUTDOWN Specification Limiting Conditions of Operation (LCOs) entered during the month.
LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO) Updated Monthly ENTRIES Chart Owner Hope Creek System Engineering Manager Goal: 6 per Month History I Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) called Technical Specifications. Certain rules require operators to enter a non-shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown is required. This metric measures the unplanned entries made at Hope Creek, compared to the expected number at top performini nuclear units (less than or equal to Blmonth).
Analysis and Actions
- I_ _ - -
Historical Data Not Available Unplanned Non-shutdown Entries are meeting the goal.
'C 20 18 16 14 a Good 0 Monthly Non Shutdown LCOs 12 0
2a, 10
-e- Monthly
-E P
8 Non -
5 6 .s A
LI Y Shutdown 4 LCOs Goal 6
2 5 3 1 4 3 3 I I 2 2 0
23
PSEG Nuclear, LLC 1 September 2004 status I DeflnItion The sum of the plannediand unplanned hours tf SALEM UNIT 1 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR the Emergency Diesel Generators were not Updated Monthly available, UNAVAlLABILITY Chart Owner 27 hours3.125e-4 days <br />0.0075 hours <br />4.464286e-5 weeks <br />1.02735e-5 months <br /> per month Salem System Engineering Manager Goal: (36 month rolling average)
History I Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipmentto removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the Emergency Diesels are out I service, compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the unavailable hours of the three 125 Emergency Diesel Generators at Salem Unit 1. This is a long-term trend of our performance.
79 Analysis and Actions This metric illustrates our perfonance on;a 36 month rolling average. Each diesel generator is taken out 0 seniice for at least one planned maintenancewindow during an 18 month operating cycle. All maintenance over the last year has been planned,thus demonstrattng progress to achieving our goal.
-I 2002 2003 I
175 150 125 0 Good
-Monthly Actual 100 -w -36Month II Rolling Actual
'a 75 2
!i 50 36 Month 25 Industry Median 0 Goal 24
PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 Status DefI nItIon The sum ofthe planned and unplannedhours that SALEM UNIT 2 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR the Emergency Diesel Generators were not Updated Monthly available.
UN AVAlLAB1LITY Chart Owner
~ ~
27 hours3.125e-4 days <br />0.0075 hours <br />4.464286e-5 weeks <br />1.02735e-5 months <br /> p u month Salem System EngineeringManager Goal:
(36 month lolling average)
- ~ ~~- -~ ~
History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed wtth a senes of redundant safety systems and equipment This allows equipment to be removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the Emergency Diesels are out of sewice, compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the unavailable hours of the three Emergency Diesel Generators at Salem Unit 2. This is a long-term trend of our performance.
Analysis and Actions
- - _ I _
29 ?A Diesel unavailability hours are currentiy meeting the goal.
2002 m 175 150 0 Good
-Monthly Actual 125 1DO W - 36 Month Rolling Actual 75 50 b-36 Month Industry Median Goal 25 0
25
September2004 1 status Definition he sum of the planned and unplanned hours ttk I
HOPE CREEK EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR i e Emergency Diesel Generators were not Updated Monthly vailable UNAVAl LABIL ITY Chart Owner Hope Creek System EngineeringManager Goal: 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> per m o n t h 06 month rolllng average)
History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to be removed from service for maintenance This metric monitors the amount of time the Emergency Diesels are out of service, compared against the industy median. The total represents the sum of the unavaiable-hours of the four Emergency Diesel Generators at Hope Creek. This is a long-term trend of our performance.
Analysis and Actions
'This metric is tracking above goal due to three unplanned maintenance windows in 2002. All maintenance petformed this year, with the exception of thirty hours, has been planned maintenance designedto improve system reliability, 175 150 0 Good -Monthly Actual 125 100 - H -36Month Rolling Actual 75 50
- 36 Month Industry Y Median 25 Goal 0
Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul SeP OCt Nov Dec 26
PSEG Nuclear. LLC I SeDtember 2004 status I DefInition The sum of the planned and unplanned hours tha I
SALEM UNIT 1 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM the Auxiliary Feedwater Systems were not Updated: Monthly available.
UNAVAlLAB1LITY Chart Owner 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> per month Salem System Engineering Manager Goal: (36 month rolling average)
~
History
- Intent of Metric
/Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to be 126 removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors &e amount of time the Salem Unit 1 Auxiliary 109 Feedwater System is out of service compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the three Auxiliary Feedwater Systems on Salem Unit 1. This is a long-term trend of our performance.
Analysis and Actions
~-
This metric is tracking above goal due to one unplanned maintenance window in 2003 and emergent and planned maintenance on the steam admission valve on the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump in 2004.
Additional maintenance on this system is planned. Testing and monitoring will be performed to ensure that the corrective actions are effective.
2002 2003 60 50 n Good Monthly Actual 40 f
2 2.- 30
- 8 -36Month Rolling Actual i
3 -c-36 Month 20 Industry Median 10 Goal 0
Jan Feb Mar Jun Jul Oct Nov Dec
..^____ __ ___ ____ .. .. -~ ... . . .... .. . ..
1 PSEG Nuclear. LLC I SeDtember2004 I
I Status I DefI nItIon SALEM UNIT 2 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM Updated Monthly the Auxiliary Feedwater Systems were not UNAVAILABILITY I Chart Owner 1
I Salem System Engineering Manager I Goal: 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average)
History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to bt removed from selvice for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of &e the Salem Unit 2 Auhliaty Feedwater System is out of selvice compared against the industry median. The total representsthe sum of the three Auxiliary Feedwater Systems on Salem Unit 2. This is a longterm trend of our performance.
Analysis and Actions During the current year, planned maintenance has been performedto maintain system reliability 60 50 -
40 -
n Good - Monthly Actual t
PaJ - -36Montf Rolling
. 5 Actual m
s 20- 71- 36 Month Industry Median 10 - Goal Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jut Aw SeP Oct Nov Dec
-~
PSEG Nuclear, LLC I September 2004 I I I Status DefInItIon The sum of the planned and unplanned hours tha HOPE CREEK RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM he Residual Heat Removal Systemswere not Updated Monthly wailable.
UNAVAlLABILIN Chart Owner 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> per month Hope Creek System Engineering Manager Goal:
(36 month rolling average)
I Histow Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipmen to be removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the Hope Creek Residual Heat Removal Systems are out of service compared against the industry median. The total representsthe sum of the both ResidualHeat Removal trains at Hope Creek. This is a long-term trend of our Analysis and Actions 50 - During the current year, planned maintenance has been performed on this system to meet goal.
z m
4 25 - 17 5
60 50 40 0 Good - Monthly Actual 2m a
30
- rn -36Month Rolling
% Actual 5
20
- 36 Month Industry 10 Median Goal I
0 Jan Feb Mar AP~ May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec 29
PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 status I Definltlon SALEM UNIT I CHEMICAL VOLUME CONTROL AND the ChemicalVolume Control and Safety Injection Updated Monthly Systems were n3t available.
SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY Char! Owner r
Salem System EngineeringManager I Goal:
14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average)
History
.- I Intent of Metric iNuclear olants are desioned with a series of redundant safe& svstems and eauiument. This allows euuiDment to be rem&dfrom service 6 r maintenance. This metric monitorsde amount of m ; e the Salem Unit 1 Chemical Volume Control and Safely Injection Systems are out of service comparedagainst the industry median. The total represents the sum of the four trains on Salem Unit 1. This is a longterm trend of our performance.
Analysis and Actions This metric is tracking above goal due to historical performanceissues. During the current year, all maintenance with the exception of some maintenance in June, was scheduledto improve system reliability, 2002 2003 175 150 Monthly 125 Actual E
E-e n
100
- - 36 Month Rolling 3
E 75 Actual 50 ---h36 Month Industy Median 25 Goal 0
Jan Feb Mar APr MW Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct NOV Dec 30
e sum of the planned and unplanned hours SALEM UNIT 2 CHEMICAL VOLUME CONTROL AND e ChemicalVolume Control and Safety Injec tems were not available SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per month Salem System EngineeringManager Goal: (36 month rolling average)
-~
History Intent of Metric
- _ I_
Nuclear plants are designedrnth a series of redundant safety systems and equipment This a l l m equipmentt(
removedfrom sekice for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the ChemicalVolume Control z Safety Injection Systems are out of setvice compared against the bdusty median. The total represents the surf the four trains on Salem Unit 2 . This is a long-term trend of our performance.
35 This metric is tracking above goal due to historical performance issues. During the current year, all maintenancewas scheduled to improve system reliability.
175 150 125 n Good - Monthly Actual 5
2 100
- - 36Rolling Month E Actual 15 3 +Y36 Month 50 Industry Median I Goal I 25 0
Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec i
31
PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004
status I Definltlon HOPE CREEK HIGH PRESSURE INJECTION AND The sum of the planned and unplanned hours tha the High Pressure Injection and Reactor Core REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING SYSTEM Updated Monthly Isolation Cooling Systems were not available.
UNAVAILABILITY Chart Owner 18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> per month Hope Creek System EngineeringManager Goal:
(36 month lolling average)
Histow f - Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipmentto be removedfrom selvice for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the High Pressure 1n:ection and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Systems are out of service compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of both systems at Hope Creek. This is a long-term trend of our performance.
"L.c Analysis and Actions
_ _ I. --
The system unavailability was impacted by planned maintenance and an original design discrepancywhich was discovered and corrected.
a" 10 0
m m3 175 150
-Monthly Actual 125 f
g 100 W - 36 Month Roiling
-.-2 Actual 3
i 75
-+-36 Month Industry 50 Median Goal 25 32