ML043360041

Licensee Slides (PSEG) for SCWE Metrics

ML043360041
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	09/30/2004
From:	Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML043360041 (32)

Text

0 Z

rn n

n m

0

-I 2 rn z

n v) cn

PSEG N LLC SCWE MANAGEMENT TRAINING ATTENDANCE Updated: Monthly Chart Owner Nuclear Training Manager status I

Definition Attendance for Safety Conscious Work Environment (SCWE) Training - PSEG Nuclear Management.

Goal:

43 associates by year end History Intent of Metric Nuclear provides a significant amount of Waining on a broad range of subjects. This metric measures the trainingl to enhance management's understanding of key Safety Conscious Work Envlronment (SCWE) policy attributes amd our collective roles and responsibilities for proper implementation. This is a full day o training1 New Indicator for 20W Analysis and Actions Safety Conscious Work Environment training for management is scheduled to be completed by the end of January 2005 175 150 125 100 75 50 3

--___I___.

12 Sept M Sept 27 S e p t a Oet 12 Oct 18 Oct 19 Oct25 Novl Nova

Nov12, Nov29 Dec6 Decl3 Attended Goal

-Remaining to Attend

-Expected to Enroll 3

-~

PSEG Nuclear. LLC I SeDtember2004 I status I

Def i n i t lo n Updated: Monthly EXECUTIVE REVIEW BOARD (ERB) ACTION APPROVALS Chart Owner Executive Review Board (ERE) reviews proposed personnel actions to ensure no retaliation or chilling effect implications.

Safety Conscious Work Environment Manager Goal:

No Adverse Trend I

History Intent of Metric The Executive Review Board (ERB) was established to ensure that no adverse amon IS taken or perceived to be taken against site personnel for raising nuclear safety issues. This Board reviews significant proposed discipline, promotions, transfers and terminahons for PSEG employees and supplemental (contract) personnel.

New Indicator for 2004 1

A nalvsis and Actions The ERB process was initiated in April, with a follow-up letter sent to all supplemental (contractor; personnel vendors in July. As expected, initial approvals were low, however, the approval rate has significantly improved as management has become more knowledgeable and experienced in the process.

20 15 u) 10 3

m LT w

5 0

11 Reporting I data entty 5

4 0

I I

I I

Jan Feb Mar APr Msy Jun Jul Aug 8

~~

mTotal Cases 0 Approved Cases Oct Nov Dec 4

Updated: Monthly EMPLOYEE CONCERNS PROGRAM (ECP) -

CONCERNS CONFIDENTIALITY / ANONYMITY I REQUEST Chart Owner The number of Employee Concerns Program OECP) concerns filed anonym1 I confidentially versus total number of concerns per month. Chart does not inc NRC 30-day requests.

Employee Concerns Program Manager Goal:

~

No Adverse Trend 2003 I

10 8

ln e 5

6 0

4 !!

2 4

s n

z an atemate means to have issues addressed outside of line management.

Analysis and Actions During the current year, there have been twenty-seven concerns (non-NRC referred) brought 1 the attention of the Employee Concerns Program. Four were submitted anoriymousiy or with specific request for confiidentiality. A review of the concerns indicates no adverse trend.

I 0

Confidentiality Requested shonymous

.Total Number of Concerns I

I 2

0 7

4 Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec a Monthly Total Confidentiality /

Anonymously rn Monthly Total Number of Concerns 5

PSEG N C

I SeDtember2004 I Status I

Def i m i t io n TOTAL NOTIFICATIONS GENERATED Total notifications generated on a monthly basis Updated: Monthly Corrective Action Program Manager History No Adverse Trend Goal:

Intent of Metric m

m f lorn t

500 B s o

Site personnel write a notfication in our Corrective Action Program (CAP) to identny an issue that needs attention. This metric illustrates the total number of notifications written each month by site personnel. We are monitoring to be sure the volume of issues is consistent with expected trends, 1

1,679 1,411 based on our own past performance as well as industry pecspective.

Analysis and Actions This performance indicator identified a normal increase.seen during the spring refueling outage period. Subsequent monthly data shows a return to typical nohoutage levels.

3,000 2,750 2,500 2,250

$ 1,750 z

1 1,500 E

l-1,250 1,000 750 500 E

2,000 1,837 2,190 2,339 1,916 1,740 I

I I

Jan Feb Mar APr Msy Jun Jul hug SeP Oct Nov Dec Monthty Total 6

Total Open 2

r h

l h

)

W W

h P

r n

u I o r. n o v ) o r. n o L n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jun-14 Jun-21 Jun-28 Jul-05 Jul-12 Jul-19 Jul-26 hug-02 Rug-09 hug-I6 Aug-23 Aug-30 SepO6 S e g l 3 Sep20 Oct-1 1 Oct-18 Oct-25 Nw-01 NoY-08 NOY-15 NOY-22 NoY-29 Dec-06 Dec-I 3 Dec-20 Dec-27 I

r I

m

ONLINE ELECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG Updated Monthly Chart Owner I

1900 by year end1 Salem Maintenance Manager and Hope Creek Maintenance Manager Goal:

History Intent of Metric This metric measures our total backlog of on-line electwe maintenance. These are items thatpo NOT have an impact on plant operations and can be fixed while the unlt is in sewce. Benchmarking indicates the industry median at 1450, with tmp performance at 1200 for our sne. Our goal is to achieve top performance by the end of 2005 Historical Data Not Available Analysis and Actions This indicator is on target to meet the year-end goal e

0" -

m I-e 2,750 I 2,500 2,250 2,000 1,750 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 n

E 3 3 s 1 Actual 0

s2 Actual I

HC Actual

-CY Goal 8

PSEG Nuclear, LLC Septem bet 2004 status I

Definition Updated. Monthly CORRECTIVE ACTION PROBLEM RESOLUTION Chart Owner I

The percent of corrective action closures determined to be acceptable by Corrective Actior Closure Board review, based on the problem resolution cniteria. The performance indicator is a monthly value.

95%

reworked and the Board approves New indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions Improvement has been achieved in the quality and completeness of correcbve action closures.

This indicator is trending to achieve the 95% acceptance goal IOG?? -I 95%

95%

95%

95%

95%

95%

95%

95%

95%

95%

90%

80% -

70% -

60% -

50% -

40% -

30% -

20% -

10% -

Reporting I data enty starts in March 0% I L

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

____.-.....___I__--

T Dee V

0 550 450 5 350 E 250 E z

150 50

-50 E

0 n

Goal

-Actual Number Reviewed 9

PSEG N LC I September 2004 I Status I

Definition Corrective Action Program Manager Percentage of Nuclear Condmon Report acwties overdue on a monthly basis, measured as a m e s wth an actual finish date occurring after the due date NUCLEAR CONDITION REPORT ACTIVITIES OVERDUE Updated: Monthly Chart Owner I

Goal:

5%

History New Indicator for 2004 Intent of Metric Ste personnel wte a notification in our Correctwe Action Program (CAP) to identrfy an issue that needs attenbon This metric tracks the timeliness of our review and corrective actions, measuring the percentage overdue, with a goal of less than or equal to 5%

Analysis and Actions The number of nuclear condition report actwbes overdue has not improved This was expected because we chose to concentrate on CAP quality first, which has improved, and we will now begin focusing on CAP timeliness as part of a methodical process improvement strategy 25%

20%

(D < 15%

d

?n g 10%

2 n

5%

0%

11%

m Monthly Overdue

• Goal Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec 10

Updated Monthly OPEN NUCLEAR CONDITION REPORT EVALUATIONS WITH DUE DATE EXTENSIONS Chart Owner I September 2004 1 Status The number of due date extensions appmved for open Nuclear Condibon Report evaluations PSEG Nuclear. LLC I

I I

Corrective Action Program Manager I

Goal:

No Adverse Trend needs attention This metnc looks at the timeliness of our revlew and corrective actions by tracking the number that have a due date extension, which IS allowed by our process. By tracktng those that are extended, we expect to see an improvement trend in overall timeliness New Indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions The trend for this indicator has not improved. This was expected because we chose to concentrate on CAP qualityfirst, which has improved, and we will now begin focusing on CAP timeliness as part of a methodical process improvement strategy.

I 100 I 89 90 -

85 80 -

E 70 -

P E

0 0 -

1 40 Reporting / data entry starts in May 20 -

10 -

0 I

I I

Monthly Total I Jan Feb Mar A P ~

May Jun Jul A w SeP 0 ct Nov Dec

PSEG Nuclear, LLC I September 2004

~~

SALEM UNIT I REPEAT MAINTENANCE ISSUES Updated: Monthly 5 1 5 -

E 3.-

E 1 0 -

Chart Owner I

Reporting I data entry starts in July Corrective Action Program Manager a"

5 -

0 status I

Definition I

I I

I I

I The number of repeat maintenance issue:

identified on safety related equipment.

No Adverse Trend Goal:

Intent of Metric History I

New Indicator for 2004 This metnc monitors the number of issues that were not fixed correctly the first time on safety-related equipment. We track items that have been fixed and need to be reworked within twelve months. This is a new metric to ensure we see a reduction as our corrective action program improves.

Analysis and Actions Review of the data forthe past quarter does not indicate an adverse trend. Analysis of the specific component challenges reported as repeat maintenance indicates that vafve issues are the largest contributor. A reviewwill be performed and corrective actions will be issued if required.

30 25 v) b) -

% 20 0

c 16 25 12 Monthly Actual Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jut Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec 12

PSEG Nuclear, LLC SALEM UNIT 2 REPEAT MAINTENANCE ISSUES The number of repeat maintenance issue!

identified on safety related equipment Updated: Monthiy Corrective Action Program Manager Goal:

No Adverse Trend New Indicator for 2004 History AnaJysis and Actions Intent of Metric This metric monitors the number of issues that were not fmd correctly the first time on safety-relatec equipment. We track items that have been fixed and need to be reworked within twelve months Thi:

is a new metric to ensure we see a reduction as our corrective action program improves Review of the data for the past quarter does not indicate an adverse trend. Analysis of the specific component challenges reported as repeat maintenance indicates that valve issues are the largest contributor. A review will be performed and corrective actions will be issued if required.

30 25 u) m 2 20 15 2

g 10 m

0 cu c c

m E

5 0

Reporting I data entry starts in July 21 20 1

I I

I I

I I

Monthly Actual Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug S w Oct N ov Dec 13

HOPE CREEK REPEAT MAINTENANCE ISSUES Updated: Monthly Chart Owner Corrective Action Program Manager Goal:

History he number of repeat maintenance issues kntified on safety related equipment.

Intent of Metric This metric monitors the number of issues that were not fixed correctly the first hme on safely-related equipment. We track items that have been fixed and need to be reworked within twelve months This is a new metric to ensure we see a reduction as our corrective action program improves No Adverse Trend New Indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions Review of the data for the past quarter does not indicate an adverse trend. Analysis of the specific component challenges reported as repeat mantenance indicates no specific component trends evident.

I 30 25 In a

m I 20 c

15

.- 5 g, 10 B

I 5

0 Reporting I data entry starts in July I

I I

I Sep Oct N ov Dec Jan Feb Mar APr MW Jun Jul Aug Monthly Actual 14

PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 SALEM UNIT 1 OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Updated: Monthly Chart Owner Salem Plant Manager status I

Definfilon The number of plant operational issues that warrant implementation of the Operational Challenges Response Team.

Goal:

No Adverse Trend History Intent of Metric We established a procedure to allow our operabng crews to request addmonal assistance to address emergent issues These are called 'Operational Challenges". This metric measures the number of tirr each month our operators engage this assistance Our goal IS to minimize the challenges to our opera crews By tracking and reviewng the challenges, we can investigate common causes and potenhal tre New Indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions Two operational challenges were experienced year to date. The first involved a challenge to performance of station battery testing within the required frequency. The second challenge was common to both Salem Units 1 and 2 and consisted of reconfiguration of the control room air conditioning system. In both cases the events were reviewed and appropriate corrective actions were taken. No adverse trends were identified.

I 10 B

8 7

8 5

4 3

2 1

0 Reporting / data enty starts in April 0

0 0

0 Monthly Total Jan F6b Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 15

SALEM UNIT 2 OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Updated Monthly Salem Plant Manager No Adverse Trend Goal:

New Indicator for 2004 9 -

8 -

7 -

m 6 6 -

5 t 4 -

0" u) m

.- B c

3 -

We established a procedure to allow our operating crews to request additional assistance to address emergent issues. These are called 'Operational Challenges'. This metric measures the number of times each month our operators engage this assistance. Our goal is to minimize the challenges to our operating crews. By tracking and rwiewing the challenges, we can investigate common causes and potential trends Analysis and Actions Sixoperational challenges were experienced year to date. Equipment issues caused four of the challenges and were comected by repairs and or design improvements. The fifth challenge invoked the cleanup of chemical residue. m e leak was elimtnated and residue removed. The final challenge was common to both Salem Units 1 and 2 and consisted of reconfiguration of the control room air conditioning system. In all cases, the events were reviewed and appropriate corrective actions were taken. No adverse trends were identified.

10 I

Reporting / data entry starts in April I

J Fl Monthly 2 -

1 -

0,

0 14

PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 status Definition The number of plant operational issues that warrant implementabon of the Operahonal HOPE CREEK OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES Updated. Monthly Challenges Response Team Chart Owner 9 -

a -

? -

m In 0 7 -

Hope Creek Plant Manager No Adverse Trend I

Goal:

I Intent of Metric We established a procedure to allow our operating crews to request additional assistance to address emergent issues. These are called Operational Challengesu This metric measures the number of times each month our operators engage this assistance. Our goal is to minimize the challenges to our operating cravs. By tracking and reviewing the challenges, we can investigate common causes and potential trends New Indicator for 2004 Analysis and Actions Six operanonal challenge; were experienced year to date. Four challenges involved equipment deficiencies that were corrected by replacement or repair. One challenge involved instabillty of the transmission line, and the remaining challenge was due to diesel maintenance. Although a trend has been established, the events were reviewed and appropriate corrective actions were taken.

10 Reporting I data entry starts in April U

3 -

2 -

1 -

0 - l I

0 0

0 Monthly Total 17

History Historical Data Not Available Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) called Technical Specifications Certain rules require operators to enter a shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unn shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entnes made at Salem Unt 1, compared to the expected number at top performing nuclear units (less than or equal to 2lmonth) 10 8

'C L

3 6 3

0 U

4

n.

3 2

0 0

Good I m Monthly Shutdown LCOS

• Monthly Shutdown LCOS Goal Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar APr M a y Jun Jul Aug Sep I.____

18

Speclfication Lirnliing Conditions of Operation (LCOs) entered dunng the month.

SALEM UNIT 1 UNPLANNED NONSHUTDOWN Updated Monthly LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO)

ENTRIES Chart Owner History Salem System Engineering Manager Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Cornmission (NRC) called Technical Specifications. Certain rules require operators to enter a non-shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entries made at Salem Unt 1, compared to the expected number at top performing nuclear units (less than or equal to Blmonth)

Goal:

6 per Month 15 A

2 I\\

5 5

3 2

I 1

I I

7%

n 5

5 4

1 I

I I

1 Historical Data Not Available Analysis and Actions ---

The unfavorable performance in May was primarily due to monitoring and instrumentation' issues.

A muiti-year capital improvement project is underway to upgrade the monitors. Nuclear instrumentation issues were addressed during the refuel outage.

20 18 16 4

2 0

c7 Monthly Non -

Shutdown LCOS

+-Monthly Non -

Shutdown LCOs Goal 1

19

The number of Unplanned LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO)

Updated Monthly I

Goal:

2 per Month Salem System Engineering Manager History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) called Technical Speclfications. Certain rules requlre operators to enter a shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of bme. or unit shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entries made at Salem Unit 2, compared to the expected number at tOF I

I Historical Data Not Available performing nuclear units (less than or equal to Zmonth)

Analysis and Actions 10 8

8 4

2 0

0-Good

=Monthly Shutdown LCOS

-r?rMonthty Shutdown LCOs Goal Apr May Jun Jul A w SeP Oct N OY Dec Jan Feb Mar I

20

SALEM UNIT 2 UNPLANNED NON-SHUTDOWN LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO)

ENTRIES Updated. Monthly Chart Owner Salem System Engineering Manager Goal:

Def I nl t Ion he number of Unplanned Non-Shutdown

'schnical Specification Limiting Conditions of

)peration (LCOs) entered during the month.

6 per Month I

History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commissio (NRC) called Technical Specifications Certain rules require operators to enter a non-shutdown LCO.

meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown is required This metric measures the unplanned entnes made at Salem Unit 2, compared to the expected number at t c performing nuclear unts (less than or equal to Blmonth)

Historical Data Not Available Analysis and Actions Unplanned Nonshutdown Entries are meeting the goal 20,

15 l8 1 0

Good

-k? 1 4 -

' C 5 12-0 1 0 -

8 -

B 5 5 -

h u

u

,.a P

L L

I L,

L, s

4 -

1 6

5 2 -

1 5

1 1

0 I

2 I

I I

I I I

2 I

I l

a 1

Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jut Aug S9P Oct Nov Dec 0

Monthly Non -

Shutdown LCOs

-Y+

Monthly Non -

Shutdown LCOs Goal

Updated Monthly Chart Owner j

History I

I :

I I

The number of Unplanned Shutdown Technical Specification Limiting Conditions of Operation (LCOs)

EnterEd during the month.

Intent of Metric:

Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) caled Technical Specifications Certain rules require operators to enter a shutdown LCO. meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown IS required This metric measures the unplanned entries made at Hope Creek, compared to the expected number at top performin!

nuclear units (less than or equal to Zmonth)

Analysis and Actions Challenges with the s m c e water system were the primary cause of this metric being above goal. A multi-year capital improvement project for the sewce water system is being developed Hope Creek System Engineering Manager Goal:

2 per Month Historical Data Not Available 0

Good

-Monthly Shutdown LCOs

+Monthly Shutdown LCOs Goal Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Sep Oct Nov Dec 22

PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 HOPE CREEK UNPLANNED NONSHUTDOWN ENTRIES LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (LCO)

Updated Monthly Chart Owner

.s 6

Hope Creek System Engineering Manager LI Y

A I

I 2

4 3

3 5

1 2

3 status Def I n It Ion The number dUhplanned Non-Shuldown Technical Specification Limiting Conditions of Operation (LCOs) entered during the month.

6 per Month Goal:

History I

Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are operated under a fundamental set of rules from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) called Technical Specifications. Certain rules require operators to enter a non-shutdown LCO, meaning the equipment must be fixed in a defined period of time, or unit shutdown is required. This metric measures the unplanned entries made at Hope Creek, compared to the expected number at top performini nuclear units (less than or equal to Blmonth).

Historical Data Not Available

-I__--

Analysis and Actions Unplanned Non-shutdown Entries are meeting the goal.

20 18 16 14 12

'C 0

2 10 a,

E 8

P 5

6 4

2 0

a Good 0

Monthly Non -

Shutdown LCOs

-e-Monthly Non -

Shutdown LCOs Goal 23

PSEG Nuclear, LLC 1

September 2004 Updated Monthly SALEM UNIT 1 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UN AVAl LAB I L I TY Chart Owner Salem System Engineering Manager status I

Defl n It ion The sum of the plannediand unplanned hours tf the Emergency Diesel Generators were not available, Goal:

27 hours3.125e-4 days <br />0.0075 hours <br />4.464286e-5 weeks <br />1.02735e-5 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average)

History I

Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the Emergency Diesels are out I service, compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the unavailable hours of the three Emergency Diesel Generators at Salem Unit 1. This is a long-term trend of our performance.

125 79 Analysis and Actions This metric illustrates our perfonance on;a 36 month rolling average. Each diesel generator is taken out 0 seniice for at least one planned maintenance window during an 18 month operating cycle. All maintenance over the last year has been planned, thus demonstrattng progress to achieving our goal.

-I 2002 2003 I

175 150 125 100 II -

'a 75 50 25 0

i! 2 0

Good

-Monthly Actual

- w -36Month Rolling Actual 36 Month Industry Median Goal 24

PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 Status Def I n It I on SALEM UNIT 2 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR U N AVAl LAB1 L I TY The sum ofthe planned and unplanned hours that the Emergency Diesel Generators were not available.

Updated Monthly Chart Owner

~

~~-

History

~

~

Salem System Engineering Manager

-~

~

Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed wtth a senes of redundant safety systems and equipment This allows equipment to be Goal:

27 hours3.125e-4 days <br />0.0075 hours <br />4.464286e-5 weeks <br />1.02735e-5 months <br /> p u month (36 month lolling average) 29

?A 2002 m

removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the Emergency Diesels are out of sewice, compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the unavailable hours of the three Emergency Diesel Generators at Salem Unit 2. This is a long-term trend of our performance.

Analysis and Actions

--_I_

Diesel unavailability hours are currentiy meeting the goal.

175 150 125 1 DO 75 50 25 0

0 Good

-Monthly Actual W - 36 Month Rolling Actual b-36 Month Industry Median Goal 25

PSEG Nuc History lear, 1 LLC I September2004 1 status I

Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to be removed from service for maintenance This metric monitors the amount of time the Emergency Diesels are out of I

Updated Monthly HOPE CREEK EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR U N AVAl LAB I L ITY Chart Owner Analysis and Actions

'This metric is tracking above goal due to three unplanned maintenance windows in 2002. All maintenance petformed this year, with the exception of thirty hours, has been planned maintenance designed to improve system reliability, Definition he sum of the planned and unplanned hours ttk ie Emergency Diesel Generators were not vailable Hope Creek System Engineering Manager Goal:

36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> per month 06 month rolllng average) service, compared against the industy median. The total represents the sum of the unavaiable-hours of the four Emergency Diesel Generators at Hope Creek. This is a long-term trend of our performance.

175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0

0 Good Y

Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul SeP OCt Nov Dec

-Monthly Actual

- H -36Month Rolling Actual 36 Month Industry Median Goal 26

PSEG Nuclear. LLC I

SeDtember 2004 Updated: Monthly SALEM UNIT 1 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM U NAVAl LAB1 LITY Chart Owner Salem System Engineering Manager status I

Def I n it ion The sum of the planned and unplanned hours tha the Auxiliary Feedwater Systems were not available.

I Goal:

11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average)

~

History Intent of Metric

/Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to be 126 109 2002 2003 removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors &e amount of time the Salem Unit 1 Auxiliary Feedwater System is out of service compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the three Auxiliary Feedwater Systems on Salem Unit 1. This is a long-term trend of our performance.

Analysis and Actions

~-

This metric is tracking above goal due to one unplanned maintenance window in 2003 and emergent and planned maintenance on the steam admission valve on the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump in 2004.

Additional maintenance on this system is planned. Testing and monitoring will be performed to ensure that the corrective actions are effective.

60 50 40 f 2 2 30 i 3 20 10 0

n Good -

Monthly Actual 36Month Rolling Actual

-c-36 Month Industry Median Goal Jan Feb Mar Jun Jul Oct Nov Dec

-~

..^____

1 PSEG Nuclear. LLC I SeDtember2004 I

Status I

Def I n I t Ion I

the Auxiliary Feedwater Systems were not Updated Monthly SALEM UNIT 2 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY I

Chart Owner 1

Salem System Engineering Manager I

I Goal:

11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average)

History Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to bt removed from selvice for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of &e the Salem Unit 2 Auhliaty Feedwater System is out of selvice compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the three Auxiliary Feedwater Systems on Salem Unit 2. This is a longterm trend of our performance.

Analysis and Actions During the current year, planned maintenance has been performed to maintain system reliability 60 50 -

40 -

t P

5 s

20-aJ m

10 -

n Good Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jut A w SeP Oct Nov Dec Monthly Actual

-36Montf Rolling Actual 71-36 Month Industry Median Goal

-~

PSEG Nuclear, LLC 50 -

4 25 -

z m

I September 2004 I Status 17 I

I Updated Monthly HOPE CREEK RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM U N AVAl LAB I L I N Chart Owner Hope Creek System Engineering Manager Def I n It Ion The sum of the planned and unplanned hours tha he Residual Heat Removal Systems were not wailable.

Goal:

12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average)

I Histow Intent of Metric Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipmen to be removed from service for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the Hope Creek Residual Heat Removal Systems are out of service compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the both Residual Heat Removal trains at Hope Creek. This is a long-term trend of our Analysis and Actions During the current year, planned maintenance has been performed on this system to meet goal.

60 50 5 40 2

m -

a 30

% 5 20 10 0

0 Good Jan Feb Mar A P ~

May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec Monthly Actual

- rn -36Month Rolling Actual 36 Month Industry Median Goal I

29

Definltlon PSEG Nuclear, LLC September 2004 status I

Updated Monthly SALEM UNIT I CHEMICAL VOLUME CONTROL AND SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY Char! Owner the Chemical Volume Control and Safety Injection Systems were n3t available.

Salem System Engineering Manager I

Goal:

14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average) r History I

Intent of Metric iNuclear olants are desioned with a series of redundant safe& svstems and eauiument. This allows euuiDment to be 2002 2003 rem&dfrom service 6 r maintenance. This metric monitors de amount of ;me the Salem Unit 1 Chemical Volume Control and Safely Injection Systems are out of service compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of the four trains on Salem Unit 1. This is a longterm trend of our performance.

Analysis and Actions This metric is tracking above goal due to historical performance issues. During the current year, all maintenance with the exception of some maintenance in June, was scheduled to improve system reliability, 175 150 125 E

E 100 e

n - -

E 75 3

50 25 0

Jan Feb Mar APr MW Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct NOV Dec Monthly Actual

- - 36 Month Rolling Actual

---h 36 Month Industy Median Goal 30

e sum of the planned and unplanned hours e Chemical Volume Control and Safety Injec tems were not available SALEM UNIT 2 CHEMICAL VOLUME CONTROL AND SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY This metric is tracking above goal due to historical performance issues. During the current year, all maintenance was scheduled to improve system reliability.

Salem System Engineering Manager Goal:

14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month rolling average)

-~

Intent of Metric

-_I_

History Nuclear plants are designed rnth a series of redundant safety systems and equipment This a l l m equipment t(

35 removed from sekice for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the Chemical Volume Control z Safety Injection Systems are out of setvice compared against the bdusty median. The total represents the surf the four trains on Salem Unit 2. This is a long-term trend of our performance.

175 150 125 5

2 100 E -

15 50 3

25 I

I 0

i n Good Jan Feb Mar APr May Jun Jul Aug SeP Oct Nov Dec Monthly Actual

- - 36 Month Rolling Actual

+Y 36 Month Industry Median Goal 31

September 2004 PSEG Nuclear, LLC HOPE CREEK HIGH PRESSURE INJECTION AND REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY Updated Monthly Chart Owner Hope Creek System Engineering Manager Histow f -

status I

Definltlon The sum of the planned and unplanned hours tha the High Pressure Injection and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Systems were not available.

18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> per month (36 month lolling average)

Goal:

Intent of Metric a" 10 "L.cm 0

m m3 Nuclear plants are designed with a series of redundant safety systems and equipment. This allows equipment to be removed from selvice for maintenance. This metric monitors the amount of time the High Pressure 1n:ection and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Systems are out of service compared against the industry median. The total represents the sum of both systems at Hope Creek. This is a long-term trend of our performance.

Analysis and Actions

__I.

The system unavailability was impacted by planned maintenance and an original design discrepancy which was discovered and corrected.

175 150 125 g

f 100 2

i 75 3

50 25

-Monthly Actual W - 36 Month Roiling Actual

-+- 36 Month Industry Median Goal 32