ML023290578
| ML023290578 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 11/16/2002 |
| From: | Nazar M Nuclear Management Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML023290578 (96) | |
Text
Committed to Nuclear Excellence Mano K. Nazar Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC 1717 Wakonade Dr. East
- Welch MN 55089 November 16, 2002 10 CFR Part 50 Section 50.55a U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket No. 50-306 License No.
DPR-60 Request for Relief No. 9 for the Unit 2 Third 10-year Interval Inservice Inspection Program On November 15, 1994 we submitted for review our third 10-year Inservice Inspection Examination Plan for Unit 2 and, on April 19, 1995, relief request revisions associated with that plan. The NRC issued its evaluation of the Third 10-year Interval Program Plan on February 22, 1996.
The purpose of this letter is to submit a relief request for "limited examinations" associated with that plan. Attached is Unit 2 Relief Request No. 9, Revision 0 which addresses those limited examinations. We are requesting relief pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50, Section 50.55a(g)(5)(iii) due to the impracticality of obtaining "100%" examination coverage for the affected items.
By letter dated March 21, 1997, we committed to submitting relief requests for "limited" examinations following each refueling outage inspection (whereas the regulation only requires that the relief requests be submitted within 12 months following the end of the inspection interval). We recently identified that we missed one, for the limited examinations encountered in the Spring 2000 Unit 2 refueling outage. Our review has determined that we submitted the requests following each of the other refueling outages since 1997. The attached relief request is for that Spring 2000 outage. We apologize for any inconvenience our failure to previously submit that relief request may have caused.
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC USNRC November 16, 2002 Page 2 In this letter we have made no new Nuclear Regulatory Commission commitments.
Please contact Jack Leveille (651-388-1121, Ext. 4142) if you have any questions related to this letter.
Mano K. Nazar Site Vice Presi nt Prairie Island clear Generating Plant c: Regional Administrator-Region Ill, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, NRC NRR Project Manager, NRC Chief Boiler Inspector, State of MN P. Fisher, Hartford Insurance
Enclosure:
ISI Relief Request No. 9 (Rev. 0), Prairie Island Unit 2, Third Interval and its attachments U2 Limited Exams.DOC
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2,3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN ISI Relief Request No. 9 (Rev. 0)
Limited Examination SYSTEM: Various Class: 1 and 2 Category: Various Item: Various Impractical Examination Requirements:
ASME Section Xl (1989 no addenda) Code requires full examination of inservice inspection (ISI) components per Table IWB-2500-1, and IWC-2500-1. Reg. Guide 1.147, Rev. 12 endorses Code Case N-460, "Alternative Examination Coverage for Class 1 and Class 2 Welds." This Code Case allows greater than 90% examination coverage of a weld to meet the "essentially 100%" requirement.
NRC Information Notice 98-42 "Implementation of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) Inservice Inspection requirements" Dec. 1, 1998, states, "The NRC has adopted and further refined the definition of 'essentially 100 percent' to mean 'greater than 90 percent' in 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(2) for required examination coverage of reactor pressure vessel welds. This standard has been applied to all examination of welds or other areas required by ASME Section XI.
The Prairie Island construction permit was issued in 1967. This facility was designed and constructed with limited accessibility due to component configurations and/or physical barriers for which 100% coverage is not achievable on some ISl components required to be examined for the Third Ten Year Interval.
Basis for Relief:
The following 10 CFR 50.55a paragraphs apply to the inservice inspection of components in accordance with the ASME Section XI code:
50.55a(g)(1): For a boiling or pressurized water-cooled nuclear power facility whose construction permit was issued prior to January 1, 1971, components (including supports) must meet the requirements of paragraphs (g) (4) and (5) of this section to the extent practical.
50.55a(g)(4): Throughout the service life of a boiling or pressurized water-cooled nuclear power facility, components (including supports) which are classified as ASME Code Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 must meet the requirements, except design and access provisions and pre-service examination requirements, set forth in Section Xl of editions of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code... to the extent practical within the limitations of design, geometry and materials of construction of the components.
50.55a(g)(5)(iv): Where an examination requirement by the code or addenda is determined to be impractical by the licensee and is not included in the revised inservice inspection program as permitted by paragraph (g)(4) of this section, the basis for this determination must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission...
Page 1 of 6
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2,3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN Prairie Island was designed and most components constructed and installed prior to development of ASME XI, therefore design for accessibility and inspection coverage is not, in many cases, sufficient to permit satisfying the current Code requirements.
Limitations to inspections are primarily due to obstructions, interferences, and weld joint configurations.
A summary of the limited examinations are described below and included in Table RR
- 9.
Part A: Category B-B, "Pressure retaining Welds in Vessels other than Reactor Vessels."
Chemical and Volume Control (VC) Weld (W-2), Cap-Integral Tube-sheet:
Volumetric coverage limited, due to cap to tube-sheet configuration, to 48.75%
for UT examination. See Attachment 1, ISI drawing 2-1SI-34 and Attachment 7, Examination Report Number 2000U138.
Part B: Category B-F, "Pressure retaining dissimilar Metal Welds in Vessels Nozzles."
Reactor Coolant (RC) Weld (W-1) Nozzle to Safe-End: Volumetric coverage limited, due to nozzle-to-safe-end configuration, to 62.5% for UT examination.
See Attachment 2, ISO drawing 2-ISI-30A and Attachment 8, Examination Report Number 2000U1 19.
Part C: Category B-J, "Pressure Retaining Welds in Piping" Reactor Coolant (RC) Weld (W-1 3) Nozzle to Pipe: Volumetric coverage limited, due to nozzle to pipe configuration, to 53.75%. See Attachment 3, ISO drawing 2-ISI-5 and Attachment 9, Examination Report Number 2000U125.
Part D: Category C-A, "Pressure retaining Welds in Pressure Vessels" Steam Generator #21 (SG) Weld (W-E) Shell to transition Cone: Volumetric coverage limited, due to ring support at weld junction, to 11.4%. See Attachment 4, ISO drawing 2-ISI-37A and Attachment 10, Examination Report Number 2000U131.
Part E: Category C-C "Integral attachments for Vessels, Piping, Pumps and Valves" Safety Injection Pump 22 Supports A (H-I), B (H-2), C (H-3), D (H-4): Surface examination (MT) coverage limited to 83.0% due to inaccessibility of the bottom Page 2 of 6
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN of support because of concrete pad interference. See Attachment 5, ISO drawing 2-ISI-60B and Attachments 11 - 14 (Examination Report Numbers 2000M087, 2000M088, 2000M086 and 2000M089).
Residual Heat Exchanger 21, Support A (H-I), and Support B (H-2): Surface examination (PT) coverage limited to 85.2% due to the configuration of the support and concrete pedestal. See Attachment 6, ISO drawing 2-ISI-69A and Attachments 15 & 16 (Exam Report Numbers 2000P054 & 2000P056).
Additional Means of Establishinq Pressure Boundary Inteqrity:
System pressure tests and associated visual inspections (VT-2) required by Section XI are performed at the required frequency to ensure the piping system is capable of maintaining pressure boundary integrity. The B-B category weld was visually examined during a pressure test in 1997, Attachment 26, List of Section XI VT-2 Examinations.
The other pressure retaining welds with limited exams were visually examined during pressure tests in 2000, Attachment 27, List of Section XI VT-2 Examinations.
System integrity is monitored during normal plant operation by many direct and indirect methods, e.g., containment radiation monitoring, containment air monitoring, containment sump monitoring, containment temperature monitoring, system walk downs, surveillance testing, etc.
In addition to the UT volumetric examination with limitations for the listed B-F Category weld, the required surface examination (PT) was completed, Attachment 17, Examination Report Number 2000P023.
In addition to the UT volumetric examination with limitations for the listed B-J Category weld, the required surface examination (PT) was completed, Attachment 18, Examination Report Number 2000P037.
In addition to the surface examinations (MT or PT) with limitations of all listed C-C Category integrally attached welds, VT-3 visual examinations were performed, Attachments 19 - 24 (Examination Report Numbers 2000V393, 2000V394, 2000V388, 2000V389, 2000V314, and 2000V313).
Alternate Examination:
Limitations to the required examination coverage have been noted on the applicable ISI examination reports and included in the 2000 ISI Outage Summary Report. NMC will continue to document examination limitations.
Page 3 of 6
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN In-service inspections at Prairie Island Unit 2 have been performed to the maximum extent practical. When examination limitations are encountered, M&MR procedure ISI LTS-1, "Limitations to NDE," is applied. ISI-LTS-1 (Attachment 25) is used when an ASME Section XI Code required examination results in less than 90% coverage of the required examination volume or area. It requires a review of the procedures to obtain maximum coverage and documentation of the limitation. The procedure also considers whether an alternative method could be used to obtain improved examination coverage required by the Code. This procedure was used for all the items identified above to determine that the maximum examination coverage was achieved.
Limitations to inspections are primarily due to obstructions, interferences, and weld joint configurations. NMC will continue to utilize the most current examination techniques available for future examinations.
Page 4 of 6
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2,3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN Table RR-9 Limited Examinations - Prairie Island Unit 2 - 2000 Refueling Outage Category Item No.
SYSTEM.
s Comp ID.
Description 4 Method, Coverage REPORT I Limfi*tation
-~
I I
I~
Summary #1.
oeae B-B B2.51 Volume Control 2-ISI-34 W-2 Cap-Integral Volumetric 48.75%
2000U138 Limited due to cap to tube Tube-sheet UT sheet configuration.
501536 B-F B5.40 Reactor Coolant 2-ISI-30A W-1 Nozzle-Safe Volumetric 62.5%
2000Ul 19 Limited due to nozzle to safe End UT end configuration.
501405 B-J B9.31 Reactor Coolant 2-ISI-5 W-13 Nozzle to Pipe Volumetric 53.75%
2000U125 Limited due to nozzle to pipe UT configuration.
501935 C-A C1.10 Steam Generator 2-ISI-37A W-E Shell to Volumetric 11.4%
2000U131 Limited due to Ring Support
502624 Cone C-C C3.30 Safety Injection 2-ISI-60B H-1 Support A Surface 83.0%
2000M087 Bottom of support Pump 22 MT inaccessible due to concrete 501377 pad.
C-C C3.30 Safety Injection 2-ISI-60B H-2 Support B Surface 83.0%
2000M088 Bottom of support Pump 22 MT inaccessible due to concrete 501385 pad.
C-C C3.30 Safety Injection 2-ISI-60B H-3 Support C Surface 83.0%
2000M086 Bottom of support Pump 22 MT inaccessible due to concrete 501390 pad.
C-C C3.30 Safety Injection 2-ISI-60B H-4 Support D Surface 83.0%
2000M089 Bottom of support Pump 22 MT inaccessible due to concrete 501396 pad.
Page 5 of 6
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN Table RR-9 Limited Examinations - Prairie Island Unit 2 - 2000 Refueling Outage Page 6 of 6 be's'P n
/l. -ov ra e kpORT; Eli; l*m'_It a tlo 40 iategory Item 1No0.
SYSTEM I
iSO*0
' CobneDDescription 1":Method'% Coverage REPORT I Limitation C-C C3.10 Residual Heat 2-ISI-69A H-1 Support A Surface 85.2%
2000P054 Limited PT examination due Exchanger 21 PT to configuration of support 501412 and concrete pedestal.
C-C C3.10 Residual Heat 2-ISI-69A H-2 Support B Surface 85.2%
2000P056 Limited PT examination due Exchanger 21 PT to configuration of support 501419 and concrete pedestal.
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2,3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN, ISO Drawing 2-ISI-34
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN, ISO Drawing 2-ISI-30A Pressunzer Nozzles Pressurizer Safety Loop "A" N~kVCO = HANGER No WEST WELD No O
= Bolt No Fs
=Valve No REF DWG XH-1106-2547 NSP - PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2 ISI DWN CHKD APPD SYSTEM Presutnzer Safer' LUNE NO 6-2RC-20A ODW NO 2-ISI-30A REV
£
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2,3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN, ISO Drawing 2-1SI-5
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2,3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN, ISO Drawing 2-ISI-37A Main Steam Nozzle N-5 Inlet Nozzle Inlet Manway B-i Ne Outlet Nozzle Outlet Manway B-2 Bottom View CL I D
= Weld No I
= Bolt No Channel Head To Tubesheet Weld Steam Generator 21 NSP - PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2 151 NSP - PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2 sI1 DWN CHKD APPD SYSTEM tefam Generator 21 LINE NO NA Inwcn NO 2-JS!-37A REV 0 DWG No 2-ISI-37A REv ýL-
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2,3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN, ISO Drawing 2-ISI-60B Discharge Flange-\\
/Sucton Flange Support Feet t-AUthru D-CW from Dn*ve End
"*Holding Lugs I
Safety Injection Pump (Typical)
Safety Injection Pump B REF DIYG XH-1001-648 NSP - PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2 ISI DWN CHKD APPD SYSTEM Safert Irnecnon Pump B LINE NO __
DWG NO 2-!SI-60B REV t A
NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN, ISO Drawing 2-ISI-69A Detail A See D Looking Down Inlet Outlet Nozzle Nozl N-2
'etail A
= HANGER Na N/S
~Outlet
=WELD No Residual Heat Exchanger 21 "1
" Thick S S Nozzle Reinforcment Ring RF. DFVG-XH-1-215 XH-1001-1022 (manual)
NSP - PH*AIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2 l Il DWN CHKD APPD SYSTEM Residual Heat Exchanger 21 UNE NO-DWG No 24SI-69A REV -2L
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
NSP I
P12 Procedure:
151-UT.
Summary No.:
501536 Procedure Revlslon/FC:
13 I
i Examination For.
ISI Work Order No.:
00002 Repoi' No.:
2000U138 Page.
I of 4
.16 32 Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
241si.34 Location:
Containment
==
Description:==
Cap-Integral Tubesht System ID: VC Component ID: W. 2 Size/Length:
6" Thlck/Dia:
.719" Umitatlons: See Comments Start Time:
10:30 Finish Time:
10:52 Temp. Tool MFG:
PTC Instruments Serial No.:
3355 Surface Temp.:
68
-F Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 98243 Angle Used 0 1 45 145T 60 Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Wo Location:
Centerlne of Weld Scanning dB N/,
37.0 400 147.0 1 Cal Sheet No.:
2000CA146, 2000CA147 Examination Surface: Inslde C]
Outside [J Indication(s):
Yeso No 10 Scan Coverage WRT Weld:
Upstream []
Downstream &a CWg CCW[a Comments:
Scans Ilmitedtin tubesheet aide top dead center and bottom dead center for 3 1/2" due to nozzle Interference. Scans limited at 90 degree for 4" due to ID tag Interference. Scans limited by attenuation on cast cap side.
Results:
NAD 0 IND E]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
GEO 5 No Reviewed Previous Data:
Examiner Level II C
§ s
Date Reviewer
,lechlnger, Todd P.
I11312000 Hailing. 15avldrA.
it
,e4 Examiner Level N/A Signature Date Slte -evlew n
NAI HIinney. Charles R.
I Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review NWA I
Heater. Stephen B..
-4
-in-ml IP 9#0t,ý Yes 7
Limitation Record SfteUA)ni NSP I
P12
-Sumniary No.:
M5015 ExaminasJon For
~
1311 tF Procedure:
ISI-UT-16 Procedure Revision/FC:
13 1
Work Order No:
0000232 ReportNo:
2000U138 Page: -
2 of 4
Desipt ton or Limitateon0 2" Nozzle at top dead center and bottom dead center. 4" Nameplate at 90 degree.
Sketch of I.mitation:
GNVD0EALSPl2FO2000WI2 SUPPLEMENTALIPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL UT1200OUl I
Urnltafto removal requirements:
None Radiation lield:
200 mR I hr N
examinerl Level 11 n#Rviwe Bleching.4ir, Todd P.
1 Afl 511312000 Hailing, David A.
57I7L Examinern Level WA Signature V Date Site Review NIA I
Klnney. Charles R.
Other Level WA Signature Date ANII Review ate WA 1
Heater. Stephen B.
I Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe SgteJUnlt NSP I
P12 Surfniy No.:
501536 Exanminaon For.
IS!
Procedure:
Procedure Revislon/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-16 13 I
0000232 Report No:
2000U138 Page:
3 of 4
1 56.000
% LengthX 62.500
% volume of length 1100 =
35.000
% total for Scan I
+n2 56.000
%LengthX 62.500
% volume of lengthI 100 =
35.000
% total for Scan 2 San 3 100.000
% Length X 62.500
% volume of length 1 t00 =
62.500
% total for Scan 3 Span4 100.000
% Length X 62.500
% volume of length I100 =
62.500
% total for Scan 4 I
Add totals and rdMde by # scam,
48.750
% total for 45 deg Other d (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
SianlI
+ 2_______
Sta n3 Scdn 4
% Length X
% Length X____
% Length X
% Length X
% volume of length! 100 =
% volume of length 100 =
% volume of length 1100
% volume of length I100 =
% total for Scan I
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 ent complete coverage otals for each scan required and divide by S o scans to determine; 750
% Total for om
-Wad Supervisor Date: 4 7.4 p
U0 P*rt Add Site
Report No.:
2000U138 Page:
4 of 4
Sutnyz o.: 50153B rxanjr:
Blechinger. Todd P.
I.
Levet Ul Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Exaniner-WA Levt NIA Site Review: Kinney, Charles R.
Ojher NIA Level:
MIA ANII Review HeateStephen B.
- CoeIater, SteraenPlot Corrfrients: COoveVA9 Plot No additional coverage obtained with 60 degree shear exam.
Sketch or Photo: G:'JDEALr5 2RO2000i SLE AL'1P2 SUPPLEMENTAL UfL200- I Date:
I
/liOo Date:
Date:.
-I I
Supplemental Report t - :- -
UT Pipe Weld Examination Report No.:
2000Ut19 Slte'Unft:
NSP I
P12 Procedure:
I$S-UT-16 Page:
1 of 5
Summary No.:
501405 Procedure Revlslon/FC:
13 I
Examination For ISI Work Order No.:
0000232 Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No:
24SI-30A Location:
Pressurizer
==
Description:==
Nozzle -Safe End System ID: RC Component ID: W-1 Size/Length:
6" Thick/Die:
1.379" Limitations: No scan area on safe-end side due to configuration.
Start Time:
15:43 Finish Time:
16:25 Temp. Tool MFG:
Talatemp Serial No:
NSP 122 Surface Temp.:
70 TF Couplant Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 98243 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 45RL i I
LoLocation:
Top Dead Center Wo Location:
Centerflne of Weld Scanning dB 44.5 44.5 65.0 Cal Sheet No.:
2000CA120,2000CA122 Exarination Surface: Inside D Outside R3 Indication(s):
Yes a NoD Scan Coverage WRT Weld:
Upstream 2 Downstream [
CWO CCW N Comments:
Performed supplemental 45 degree RL examination due to attenuation concerns on weld metal and Inconel buttering.
Results:
NAD 0]
IND -
GEO Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level 11 Date Reviewer
(
~
Sig ture Blechinger, Todd P.
I
.. _ M riayr_-
5/31000 Hailing, David A.
I Examiner Level II
- Slgnature, Date Site Review Kilpela, Mathew F.
V312000 KoInney, Charles R.
Other Level WeA Signature Date ANII Review Dt IN/A IHeater.
Stephen B.
I pp00i'
MP Site/Unit:
NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501405 Examination For I$1 Ultrasonic Indication Report Procedure: i ISI-UT-16 Procedure Revlslon/FC:
13 I
Work Order No.:
000232 Report No.:
2000U119 Page:
2 of 5
Search Unit Angle:
45 Wo Location:
Top Dead Center Lo Location:
Centerline of Weld
(
Piping Welds 0 FerrlticVessels
> 27 o Other MP Metal Path Wmax Distance From Wo To S.U. At Maximum Response RBR Remaining Back Reflection WI Distance From Wo At NIA Of Max (Forward)
L Distance From Datum W2 Distance From Wo At NIA Of Max (Forward)
Wo Wm CL Wi l E:ni SAMPLEC INDICATiON Scan Indication W
Forward Backward L1 L
I RBR Remark No.
Of Max N/AOfMax N/AOfMax N/A Max WA Amp.
DAC W
100%
1.5 1.55 N/A A NA A
WA A 4c.w NWA N/A 360,DegreIntermi*entClad**oom.,y Behne, Tod P.
I f
Iý IM2 aln.DvdA Exmi,'ner Level,,
ý r
Date SteRevimew o?
Datea lVllpela, Mathew F.
I 13120001 Kinney, Chalsrt
- k.
Other-Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Uf.
Ilo
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2000WU19 Page:
3 of 5
Summary No.: 501405 3:.,
R Examiner: Blechinger, Todd P.
.Level:
II Reviewer Hailing, David A.
Examiner. Kilpela, MathewlF. i Level 11 Site Review:. Kinney, Charles R.
Other. WA Level:
NIA ANII Review. Heater. Stephen B.
Date:
Date. ____,_o_
Date:
Comments: Indication l1-Clad Interface Geometry Sketch or Photo:
O.VDDEN!
O2000P2 SUPPLEMENTALVPV2 SUPPLEMBUAL U'L2000Ui up LA I
I i
',
1f71/
S z
a 0
C.)
- 4) 0
.4..
E aaj w
a-I liz zo (WO I :
Ix I
I I I ii I
CO
- 1 I
I-Sn 4.4 C I I
l 1W Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe SitelUnit:
NSP I
P12 Summary No:
501405 Examination For:
ISl Procedure.
Procedure Revlslon/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-16 13 I
0000232 Report No.:
2000U119 Page:
6 of 5
Site Field Supervsor.t i
"4 dog Scan I 100.000
% LengthX M2.000
%volumeroflengthlloo=
52.000
% total for San Scan2 100.000
% Length X 46.000
% volume of length I 100 -
46.000
% total for Scan 2 Scan3 100.000
% Length X 76.000
% volume of lengl 100 =
76.000
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 76.000
% volume of length I100-76.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by 2 scans r 62.00
% total for 45 dog Other deg (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans Scan 1 0.000
% Length X
% volume of length 1100 = __%
total for Scan I Scan2 000
% LengthX
%volume of length-1100=
% total for Scan 2 Scan3 0.000
% LengthX volumeoflengthI100 =
% total for Scan 3 Scan4 0.000
%LengwpX
%volume oflength1100 =
% total forScan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine;
$4500
% Total for complete exam Example - 45 deg scan 1 - 63% plus supplemental 60 deg scan 1 28% ( of remaining required scan volume ) for total of 91% coverage for scan 1 volume. Repeat for the remaifnng scans. add together and divide by the 0 of scans (typicaly 4).
Date:
UT Pipe Weld Examination SIteJUnit NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
801935 Examination For:
IS!
Procedure:
Procedure Revislon/FC:
Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No:
24SI. 5 Location: CONTAINMENT
==
Description:==
Nozzle to Pipe System ID: RC Component ID: W.13 Size/Length:
6" ThiclkDla:
2.0" T Umitatlons: *See Comments Start Time:
11:10 Finish Time:
12:32 ISI-UT-18 13 I
Report No.:
2000U125 Page:
1 of 3
I amp. 1 001 Mrr;
" G instrumenm Serial No.:
3356 Surface Temp.:
95
'F Couplantr Sonobtace 40 Batch No.:
- 98243 Angie Used 1 0 145 1 45T 60 j
ILo Location:
Top Dead Center Wo Location:
Centerline oftWeld Scanning dB I
lNA 38.5 153.0 51.0 Cal Sheet No.:
2000CA131, 2000CA132 Examination Surface: Inside 0 Outside [
Indication(s):
YesO No 2 Scan Coverage WRT Weld:
Upstream R Downstream r-CWg CCWo Comments:
- No scans on cold leg and weld due to configuration.
Results:
NAD [a IND Q Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
GEO fl No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner.
Level,l t.*
Date, Reviewer signatur Datel Examiner Level nadI Date Site Review
/DateI V~lpela R~thewF.
5/62000 V~lnney, Charles R.
/
C IOthe Level, NA Signature Date ANII Review
- /
Date]
INIA I
IHeater, Stephen B.
I
.:r.1.7.0:*
-. '.
U
=
I "-
14 64'A14ceJrJ 9
fa14~~
ago jr.T2,g M 0 A
ýJN M
P Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Report No--
SiteUrnit*
NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501935 Examination For ISl Procedure.
Procedure RevlsIon/FC.
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-I 6 13 I
0000232 2000U125
- i.
Page:
2 of 3
Scan1 100.000
% LengthX 73.000
%voumieoflength100.=
73.000
% total for Scan I Scan2 100.000
% LenghX 95.000
%volumeoflengthlO0=.
95.000
% total for Scan2 Scan3 100.000
% Length X 11.000
% volume oflength 1100 =
11.000
% total for Scan 3 Scan4 100.000
% Length X 11.000
%volumeoflength100l=
11.000
% tolal for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by scan* a 47.500
% total for 45 dog Other deg-60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan1 100.000
% LengthX 20.000
% volume oflength I IO =
20000
% total for Scan 1 Scan2 100.000
% LengthX 5.000
%volume of length100=
5.000
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3
% LenglhX
%volume oflength1100=
% total for Scan 3 Scan4
% Lenigth X
%volume oflengthl1t00=
% total for Scan 4 Percent com plete coverage Add totals for each scan required and dride by # of scans to determine;
% Total for complete exam Example -,45 deg scan 1 = 63% plus supplemental 60 deg scan I a 28% (of remaining required scan volume) for total of 91% coverage for scan I volume. Repeat for the remaining scans, add together and divide by the # of scams (typicay 4).
Ste Field Supervisor~
Date:
SiteaJnit:
NSP 1
P12 Summary No.:
501935 Examination For.
ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
IS1-U'r.6 Procedure Revislon/FC:
13 1
Work Order No.:
0000232 Report No.:
2000UM25 Page:
3 of 3
Description of Limitalion:
No scans on cold leg and weld due to configuration.
Sketch of Unftatlon:
G IIDDEALSOP12RFO20002PI2 SUPPLEMENTALtP12 SUPPLEMENTAL UTt000Ui
\\-
Umitatlons removal requirements:
None CoM0 Radiation field:
250 mRIHR Examniner Level N 4ga~
Date Reviewer We~ntu e
Blechinger, Todd P.
I 516r2000 Hailing, David A.
I Examiner Level fl DateSite Review e
ilpela, Mathew F.
I 66=000 /(Inney. Charles Rt.
-p Oiher Level IA signature Date jANI Review Date.
I NA I
IHeater. Stephen B.
I
ý
ý J70 M
NONE I
UT Vessel Examination SIte/Iaft4; NSP
_-Y12 Summary No.:
802624 Examination For:
ISI Procedure:
ISUT-3 Procedure Revision/FC:
9 1
Work Order No.:
0000232 Report No.:
2000U131 Page:
1 of 19a'
/c' Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
24Sf-37A Location:
Containment
==
Description:==
Shell to Trans Cone System ID: SG Component ID-W.E Size/Length:
450.5" Thilck/Dia:
2.82" Umitations: See attached limitation records.
Start Time:
11:09 Finish Time:
17:32 Examination Surface:
Inside C]
Outside 62 Surface Condition: Ground Smooth Temp Tool MFG:
Tolatamp Serial No.:
NSP 123 Surface Temp.:
75 "F Couplant Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 98243 AngleUsed I 0 1 45 I 45T 6 e0 e60T I I
LoLocation:
CenterflneofFWNozde Wo Location:
Top To*
Scanning dB 44.6 164.6 164.l 60.2 60.2 Cal Sheet No.:
2000CA135,2000CA137.20000A138 Indication(s):
Yes []
No Ea Scan Coverage WRT Weld:
Upstream C" Downstream CW[]
CCW[
Comments:
Noted Indications recorded on Report #90-229, located outside exam volume.
Results:
NAD Sa IND [
GEO Percent Of Coverage Obtained 9 80%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level Si n re Date Reviewer Signature Pate Au.er, Roberto.
I56/612000 Hailing, David A.
I S 1 Examniner Level ii gnaza Date Site ReviewDt Nwgard, Jerry W.
I51612000 Kinney, Charles R.
I Other Level NIA a
4 Sig ture Date ANII Review N/A I
Heater, StephenB.
B.
Sl Limitation Record Sde/Unlt INSP I
P12 Sumrpary No:
502624 Examlrnfon For.
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revlsion/FC Work Order No.:
151-UT-3 9
I 0000232 Descrip ion of Umltalon Top vle, limitations #1 upper lateral support rng bolted ianges, each 7" in length, 4 -1 t ir to 13' 5. #2 - t7 2"toT 1 9",
- 3.31' S"to 32, #4-36' 2" to 36'S% Side view limitation. support ring covers entire weld and lower 112" of base material Include l In the exam area.
Sketch 4f Uimitaton:
(XVD.EAL5WI2RF02000%pl2 SUPPLEMENTALPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL Uro 1i "To? v LF..
tO417. LE Umitatiw removal requirements:
None Radiatiorl field.
6-30 mR Exardnef Level 11 Date Revie-wernaue P
Auer, R.ort G.
I iý4000 Hailing, David A.
I ai Level 1A Date Ste Review Ewa NIA
- IHeater, Stephen B.
I I
NS Report No.:
200OU131 Page:
2 of 6
Supplemental Report Summar, No.: 502624 Exaner AuerRobertG.
Exec inet Newgard, Jerry W.
I e.
MA Report No.:
2000U131 Page:
3 of 6
Level.
II Reviewer Halting, David A.
Level:
If Site Review. Kinney, Charles R.
Level:
WA ANII Review Heater, Stephen B.
I-I Scan - No exam volume achieved due to support ring.
Degree Scanm - Scan #1 - No scan from Us direction due to support ring. Limited exam volume was achieved from second leg of Scan 12 Scan #2 - ULmited scan from tifs direction due to support ring and support ring bolted flanges.
kLnited exam volume was achleoved.
Scans #3 and 4 - No exam volume was achieved due to support ring.
See attached coverage workshees.
0ý Cofn o Deg"e 45 and 6 Date:._____
Date:
A,.-
t
ro Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Vessels Report No:
2000U131 P.te/UnIt:
USP I
P12 Procedure:
ISl-UT-3 Page:
4 of 6
SuaT*, No.:
502624 Procedure Revislon/FC:
9 I
ExamlrrJton For.
ISl Work Order No.:
0000232 O feg Planar 9can 93.800
% Length X 0.000
%volumeoftlegh1100o=
0.000
% total for 0 deg t
nl 93.800
% Lenglh X 27A00
% volume of length II00 =
25.701
% total for Scan I "can2 93.800
% Length X 30.500
% volume of length 100,,
28.609
% total for Scan 2 Scan3 93.000
% Length X 0.000
%volumeoflengthl10o=
0.000
% total for Scan 3
$can4 93.800
% Length X 0000
% volume oflength 1100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by S scans =
13.578
% total for 45 deg 6I
.Szan I 93.800
% LengthX 34.700
% volume of length 1100 =
32.549
% total for Scan I San 2 93.800
% Length X 53.700
% volume of length 1100-50.371
% toWal for Scan 2 SLan3 93.800
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length 1100 -
0.000
% total for Scan 3
=an4 93.800
% LengthX 0.000
%volumeoflength1100=
0.000
%total for Scan 4 kdd totals and dvde by # cans-20.730
% tota for 60 deg Pe ent complete coverage totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determne;
% Total for complete exam Notn Sup )lemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles I methods. When used. the coverage for volume not ned with angls as noted above shall be calculated and added to the total to provide the perent tl f
t c
e exat SueviorL
Supplemental Report Surmmary1No.: 502624 Excaner. Auer, Robert G.
Exa4irner Newgard, Jerry W.
Cther. WA Report No.:
200OU131 Page:
5 of 6
Level:
IU Reviewer. Hailing, David A.
Level:
II Site Review: Kinney, Charles R.
Level.
WA ANII Review:. Heater, Stephen B.
conimnents None G.'IDDEAL-OPMRFO200PI2 SUPPLEMENTALMPI2 SUPPLEMENTALUTM" upper ldeal support ring W-E 450 COVERAGE PLOT I.
Date,-:/A Date:
Date:
Sketch o0 Photo:
1-I Q.,
i
Summar)
Exan Exan C
No.: 502624 iner Aver, Robert G.
rner Newgard, Jery W.
thet WA IT
*1*
Courkn-eft: None Sketch oj Photo:
GiJDD
.5MI2RFO200PI2 SUPPLEMENTALP12 SUPPLEMEAL. f200DU1 upper lateral "support ring W-E 60P COVERAGE PLOT Supplemental Report Repot No.:
2000U131 Page:
6 of 6
Level II Revewer Hailing, David A.
Date:
Level II Site Review-Kinney, Charles R.
Date:
Level.
NIA ANII Review. Heater, Stephen 9.
Date: jr-t:e I
cý
it Magnetic Particle Examination Sum Examn*
Site/Unit:
NSP I
P12 mary No.:
501377 ation For:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT.1 10 I
0000232 Report No.:
2000M087 Page:
1 of 3
Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
24SI-60B Location:
Aux Building
==
Description:==
Support A System ID-SI Component ID: H-1 Size/Length:
NIA Thick/Dia:
.75" Limitations: See attached sketch.
Light Meter MFG-N/A Serial No.:
NIA Illumination:
NZA Temp. Tool MFG:
N/A Gray Card (if used):
Not Used Lo Location:
Support Bolt Centerline Serial No.:
N/A Surface Temp.:
<600 "F
Cal Block Serial No.:
N/A Surface Condition:
As Welded Field Orientation:
Longitudinal Magnetic Particle Material:
Brand:
Magnaflux Type:
8A Red Wet [I Mixed:
Yes C]
Dry Ea No [
Applied By:
Dusting R Spraying 0]
Batch No.:
92B062 Fluorescent El Equipment:
Wth:
Parker Research Head Shot
--]
N/A Amperes Adj. Spacing
[
Prods. Spacing El 6n N/A Inches Inches N/A Serial No.:
Fixed Spacing Encircling Coils El N/A Current (machine setting)
El Flooding.,
7817 AC P' DC E Turns W/A Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
MTPI Gauge - LMT-90 Results:
NAD EZ IND Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level Ii Sijiature Date Reviewer Signature Date Johnson, JefferyM.
NL v52W/2000 Hailing, David A.
(Q KýZ j
-5/Z0/,0D Examiner Level N/A Stiature Date Site Review
_,-,Signa
\\
/
Date N/A Kinney, Charles R.
Other Level WA Signature Date ANII Review
',,Date NIA I
Heater, Stephen B.
/1-
'W 8A
&W Site/Unit:
NSP l
P12 Summary No.:
501377 Examination For:
ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
Procedure RevislonFC:
Work Order No.:
I1S-MT-1 10 1
0000232
~/1/
Report No:
2000M087 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
6" of weld on bottom of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:UDDEAL50\\PI2RFO2000\\IP2 SUPPLEMENTALAPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL MT2O00M Icoy LJcff2
Sr F4i'ap CASI&
LJ4I.
4/V04' Accis.~4hi, weLA S/Vor~i 5,P p
'C'
-er.
7'r'P e-*
oJ
~5ujp/ocr7S PA4 Limitations removal requirements:
None Radiation fild:
< - 5 mR I hr Examiner Level II Siglature Date Reviewer Signature Date Johnson, Jeffoiy M.
I 6~Jfr...-
1251000 Hailing, David A.
1(7 1XJL f3/CTz Examiner Level WA SIature Date Site Review Sionture-Date WA inney, Charles R.
IU Other Level WA Signature Date ANII Review Date NIA Heater, Stephen B.
I I
mm I
I
14 X~ M hL~jIf Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501377 Examination For.
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-.1 10 i
0000232 Report No.:
2000M087 Page:
3 of 3
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length 36.000 Width 2.000
=Total Area required 72.000 square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined Percent coverage 60.000 sq. In. I Total area required (100%)
72.000 sq. in.
% (area reiluired - area of limitations = area examined) fv To determine length of a circumferential weld Note -
Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000 (PQ 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 "3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 5027 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4-5 14.14 20 20-0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77 SDate:
Site Field Supervisor.
W Site/Unit NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501385 Examination For.
ISI Magnetic Particle Examination Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
1SI-MT-1 10 1
0000232 Report No.:
2000M088 Page:
1 of 3
Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
24SI-60B Location:
Aux Building
==
Description:==
Support B System ID: SI Component ID: H-2 Size/Length:
N/A Thick/Dia:
.75" Limitations: See attached sketch.
Ught Meter MFG:
NIA Temp. Tool MFG:
N/A Gray Card (if used):
Not Used Cal Block Ser Lo Location:
Support Bolt Centerline
- Fiel, "Magnetic Particle Material:
Brand:
Magnaflux Wet Type:
8A Red Dry Batch No.:
92B062 Fluorescent Equipment:
Parker Research Head Shot Nl NA Amperes Adj. Spacing R
6" inches Prods. Spacing E]
NIA inches Serial No.:
WA Illumination:
N/A uw/cm2 Serial No-N/A Surface Temp.:
<600 TF aia No.:
NIA Surface Condition:
As Welded d Orientation:
Longitudinal El El Mixed:
Yes El No 66 With:
NWA Serial Nc Applied By:
Dusting []
Spraying [I Flooding El o.:
7817 Fixed Spacing El AC FZ DC El Encircling Coils El NIA Tums Current (machine setting)
El NIA Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
RIL Comments:
None Results:
NAD [
IND E-_
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level 1i Sig ure Date Reviewer S
ate Johnson, JefferyM.
I Jv\\
5125/2000 Halling, David A.
I Examiner Level NIA Si attire Date Site Review Dt W/A I
Knney, Charles R.
I Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review re Date WA I
Heater, Stephen B.
I I
- 1.
1
.h
-p Site/Unit:
NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501385 Examination For ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
ISI-MT-1 Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
Report No.:
2000M088 Page:
2 of 3
10 I
0000232 Description of Limitation:
6" of weld on bottom of pads are inaccessible due to concrete pad.
Sketch of Umitation:
G:IDDEALS0MPt2RFO2000P2 SUPPLEMENTALPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL MT12000M sr i A W V'
do or 14tL. W 1po
,e' 4-PAW S
8s Szr CA S v Umitations removal requirements:
None Radiation field:
<-5 mR I hr Examiner Level II Sig at re Date Reviewer
- Signature ate Johnson, Jeffery M.
K i,
A.
5/2512000 Hailing, David A.
1 0D Examiner Level NIA 4
Sig ture Date Site Review 1
Date N/A I
Kinney, Charles R.
.AI Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review B
Date NIA I
Heater, Stephen B.
/
Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site/Unit:
NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501385 Examination For ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
ISI-MT-l 10
/
Report No.:
2000M088 Page:
3 of 3
Work Order No.:
0000232 Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length 36.000
- Width 2.000
= Total Area required 72.000 square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 60.000 sq. in. /Total area required (100%)
72.000 sq. In.
Percent coverage L
% (area required - area of limitations = area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note -
Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000
- (PI) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4..5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77,_
Sit FildSuevio-
- 3eo-c
.~ b Wb' Site Field Supervisor:
Magnetic Particle Examination Site/Unit:
NSP i
Summary No.:
5' Examination For P12 01390 ISl Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-1 10 I
0000232 Report No.:
2000M086 Page:
1 of 3
Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
2-si-60-b Location:
Aux Building
==
Description:==
Support C System ID: SI Component ID: H-3 Size/Length:
N/A ThicklDia:
.76" Umitations: See attached sketch.
Ught Meter MFG:
Temp. Tool MFG:
Gray Card (if used):
Not !
Lo Location:
Support B Magnetic Particle Material:
Brand:
Magnaflux Type:
8A Red Batch No.:
92B062 Equipment:
Head Shot Li N/,
Adj. Spacing
[
6' Prods. Spacing 1
N NIA Serial No.:
N/A Illumination:
NWA uwl.cm2 NWA Serial No.:
NWA Surface Temp.:
<600 TF Jsed Cal Block Serial No.:
NWA Surface Condition:
As Welded olt Centerline Field Orientation:
Longitudinal Wet Li Dry ]
Fluorescent Li Parker Research A.
Amperes "inches rA inches Mixed:
Yes L]
No[6 With:
N/A Serial N(
Fixed Spacing
[i Encircling Coils Li NIA Current (machine setting)
Li Applied By:
Dusting P]
Spraying L' Flooding Li 7817 AC 2 DC I
Turns N/A Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
None Results:
NAD [
IND L_
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:"
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level II Signaltr Date Reviewer Sgau Date Johnson, Jeffery M.
I 5125/12000 Hailing, David A.
Examiner Level N/A Signj jre Date Site Review e
NIA Kinney, Chares R.
Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review ign.
Date N/A
- IHeater, Stephen B Wb'
-p SitelUnit:
NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501390 Examination For ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
Procedure Revislon/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-1 10 I
0000232 4/9a c-4nýL
(-3 Report No.:
2000M086 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
6" of weld on bottom of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
Sketch of Umitation:
G %IDDEAL50P12RFO2000PI2 SUPPLEMENTALWPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL M'I'000M Lcr44~ LiJ 5 614-57 P
- "F'CAr*
weLd covr,.rO C:%
c~.S~p~F-r S'.P.
A ALPACT Al I ti o
dr T7 Sir PtMp G-A S Umitations removal requirements:
None Radiation field:
<-5 mR 1 hr Examiner Level II Slglature Date Reviewer Sn Date Johnson, JefferyM.
,I Vi&,...
512512000 Hailing, David A.
/00 Eainer Level N 0A SIature Date Site Review bate NIA Ki(nney, Charles R.
145a_*
- ),*"J, Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Date WiA
/Heater, Stephen B.
I i
Description of Umitation:
6" of weld on bottom of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
dr Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations SiteWUnMt:
NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501390 Examination For ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
ISI-MT-1 10
/
Report No.:
2000M086 Page:
3 of 3
Work Order No.:
0000232 Area Required (as shown In applicable code reference drawing)
Length 36.000 Width 2.000
= Total Area required 72.000 square Inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 60.000 sq. In. I Total area required (100%)
72.000 sq. in.
= Percent coverage
//43
&3 % (area required - area of limitations = area examined)
I-To determine length of a circumferential weld Note -
Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000 (Pi) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 Inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Ckicumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50.27 3,5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4..5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 Site Field Supervisor.
ate:
.?.-,-,*"
Site/Unit:
Summary No.:
Examination For.
Magnetic Particle Examination NSP
/
P12 501396 ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
1St-MT-1 10 I
0000232 Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
2-4s-60-b Location:
Aux Building
==
Description:==
Support D System ID: SI Component ID: H-4 Size/Length:
NIA Thick/Dia:
.75" Limitations: See attached sketch.
Light Meter MFG:
N/A Serial No.:
N/A Illumination:
NIA Temp. Tool MFG.
Gray Card (if used):
Lo Location:
N/A Not Used Support Bolt Centerline Magnetic Particle-Material:
Brand:
Magnaflux Serial No.:
N/A Surface Temp.:
<600 F
Cat Block Serial No.:
NWA Surface Condition:
As Welded Field Orientation:
Longitudinal Wet l Mixed:
Yes [I Applied By:.
Dusting R 8A Red 92B062 Dry R Fluorescent 0]
Parker Research Head Shot
[]
NA Amperes Adj. Spacing
[Z 6"
Inches Prods. Spacing
]
WIA Inches No []
With:
N/A Serial No.:
Fixed Spacing Encircling Coils Current (machinese
[0 Spraying []
Flooding []
7817 AC[]
DC-
[]
N/A Turns tting)
I NWA Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
None Results:
NAD 9 IND []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level t
Sigjure Date Reviewer SD Johnson, Jeffery M.
I 5125/2000 Hailing, David A.
I L/h%
Examiner Level N/A
[
Slature Date Site Review
,g Date NIA I
t
,Kinney, Charles R.
I,:::er Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Date N/A Heater, Stephen B.
I Type:
Batch No.:
Equipment:
11111111 Report No.:
2000M089 Page:
1 of 3
-p Site/Unht:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501396 Examination For:
ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
ISI-MT-I Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
Report No.:
2000M089 Page:
2 of 3
10 1
0000232 Description of Umnitation:
6" of weld on bottom of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
G:MJDDEAL50WPI2RFO20002 SUPPLEMENTALPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL MTV2000M
-4 6a'.s Ill WeLd
`V0'.,fL.-tS w,,.LA CO
-S PAd xwk;4J¶ &111k C,"
ir JI CA S w !Y Urmitations removal requirements:
None Radiation field:
< - 5 mR I hr Examiner Level 11 Sig ature Date Reviewer I
Dat Johnson, Jeffery M.
Jl M
5 6/2512000 Hailing, David A.
lI j4(
5../C/
Examiner Level N/A Sitature Date Site Review Date Other Level WA Signature Date ANII Review Date WA
- IHeater, Stephen B Sketch of Urmitation:
S-pp-,or PAJ 0~0 Description of Limitation:
6" of weld on bottom of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
44,ei IV 19ro r 3Cf Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site/Unit NSP 1
P12 Summary No.:
501396 Examination For.
ISl Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-.MT-1 10 I
0000232 Report No.:
2000M089 Page:
3 of 3
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length 36.000
- Width 2.000
= Total Area required 72.000 square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 60.000 sq. in. I Total area required (1009/6) 72.000 sq.-In.
Percent coverage
% (area required-area of limitations area examined)
% (arerreqire To determine length of a circumferential weld Note-Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000 (PQ 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 160 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4..5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10,75F i33.77 Site Field Supervisor.
- ate:
-p Liquid Penetrant Examination Report No.:
2000P054 Site/Unit NSP I
P12 Procedure:
ISI-PT-1 Page:
I of 3
Summary No.:
501412 Procedure Revision/FC:
12
/
Examination For:
ISI Work Order No.:
0000232 Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
2-1si-694 Location:
==
Description:==
Support A System ID: RH Component ID: H-I Size/Length:
N/A Thick/Dia:
N/A Limitations: See attached limitation data sheets.
Temp. Tool MFG:
Telatemp Serial No.:
NSP 123 Surface Temp.:
85 "F
Surface Temperature of Comparator Block (if used): Side A.
N/A OF Side B:
N/A "F Gray Card (if used):
Not Used Lo Location:
Upper Left Comer Surface Condition:
AS WELDED Cleaner Penetrant Remover Developer Brand Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Type SKC-S SKL-HFIS SKC-S SKD-S2 Batch No.
98L07K 87C054 98L07K 97J04K Time Evap.
5 Min -
Dwell 15 Min Evap.
5 Min Develop 10 Min Time Exam Started:
11:10 Time Exam Completed:
12:00 Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
See attached limitation data sheets.
Results:
NAD [
IND E]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level I!
Date Reviewer
.Si tu Date Auer, Robert G.
I 511312000 Hailing, David A.
I 451/o Examiner Level N/A L/Signature Date Site Review Sip D te N/A I
inney, Charles Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Date WA IHetrStpeB.LrZ0
,qs
W Site/Unit NSP
/
P12 Summary No.:
501412 Examination For.
ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-PT-1 12
/
0000232 Report No.:
2000P054 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Umritation:
Support sits on top of concrete pedestal. The outer radius of RHR-HX-21 and pedestal are in such close proximity as to preclude access to the center 12" of the bottom attachment weld.
Sketch of Umitation:
G:IDDE_.AL50M*,2RF0200002 SUPPLBAENTALT1I2 SUPPLEMENTAL P'I2000PO Limitations removal requirements:
None Radiation field:
2-5 mR 1 hr.
Examiner Level II X
Date Reviewer Date Auer, Robert G.
1 6/1312000 Hailing, David A.
a A Examiner Level N/A /
6nature Date Site Review WA I(neCalgI Other Level NIA Signature Date,----e-iew reA.
Date N/A I
Heater, Stephen B.
I J1FJTfa 4!On 4! -
-a
Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site Summary Examination
,Unit:
/
P12 No.:
501412 For.
ISI Procedure:
ISI-PT-1 Procedure Revislon/FC:
12 l
Work Order No.:
Report No.:
2000P054 Page:
3 of 3
0000232 Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length 81.000 Width 1.750 Total Area required 141.750 square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 120.750 sq. in. /Total area required (100%)
141.750 sq. In.
= Percent coverage AV5-
% (area required - area of limitations = area examined)
NA 20 To determine length of a circumferential weld Note -
Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000
- (Pi) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4..5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 7540 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77 1
1 1
Date:
Site Field Supervisor
/S-PD-
[SLiq Site/Unit NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501419 Examination For.
ISI AuAcAawj 16o uld Penetrant Examination
/
3 Report No.:
2000P056 Procedure:
ISI-PT-1 Page:
1 of 3
Procedure Revision/FC:
12 1
Work Order No.:
0000232 Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
24sl-69-a Location:
==
Description:==
Support B System ID: RH Component ID: H-2 Size/Length:
WA Thick/Dia:
NIA Umitations: See attached Umitation Data Sheet.
Temp. Tool MFG:
Telatemp Serial No.:
NSP 123 Surface Temp.:
85 F
Surface Temperature of Comparator Block (if used): SideA:
N/A "F Side B:
- F Gray Card (if used):
Not Used Lo Location:
Upper Left Corner Surface Condition:
As Welded Cleaner Penetrant Remover Developer Brand Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Type SKC-S SKL-HF/S SKC-S SKD-S2 Batch No.
98L07K 87C054 98L07K 97J04K Time 1Evap.
5 Mn Dwell 15 Mn Evap.
5 Min Develop 10 Min Time Exam Started:
11:25 Time Exam Completed:
12:15 Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
None.
Results:
NAD []
IND E]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No i
LI Examiner Level 11 Zg Date Reviewer Signature Date Auer, Robert G.
I
/?Ha/i5/t3/2000 Hailing, David A.
I Examiner Level NWA V
atue Date Site Review N/A I
tneCalsR Other Level WA Signature Date ANII Review Date IWA I
Heater, Stephen S.
I
.ZUOd
F7Ts Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501419 Examination For ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-PT-1 12 l
0000232 Description of Limitation:
Support sits on top of a concrete pedestal. The outer radius of RHR-HX-21 and pedestal are In such close proximity as to preclude access to the center 12" of the bottom attachment weld.
Sketch of Umitation:
G:UDDEAL50%P2RFO2000Pl2 SUPPLEMENTALTPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL PT)2000PO m,
ftj t 'J
-s I.,I<::"I*
-I jminTcnon Limitations removal requirements:
None.
Radiation field:
2-5 mR I hr Examiner Level II
/1g r
Date Reviewer Signature Date Auer, Robert G.
I/f*s
-'5-/7 6113/2000 Halling, David A.
ISA.-.-
2A
- /,/o Examiner Level N/A Vgnature Date Site Review E
I-ate W/A I
Knney, CharlesR F I
- , 40 Other Level 'N/A Signature Date ANII Review Date N/A I
Heater, Stephen B.
I F-.,C-Report No.:
2000P056 Page:
2 of 3
I
Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations SiteJUnit:
NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501419 Examination For ISI Procedure:
Procedure RevisionFC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-PT-1 12 1
0000232 Report No.:
2000P056 Page:
3 of 3
Area Required (as shown in app~licable code reference drawing)
Length 81.000 aWdth 1.750
=Total Area required 141.750 square Inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 120.750 sq. in. /Total area required (100%)
141.750 sq. in.
= Percent coverage
_...D.26
% (area required - area of limitations = area examined)
Z ;/,
To determine length of a circunferential weld Note-Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000
- - (Pi) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4..5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77 Site Field SupervisorDa Date:
I
'I
- 1 Liquid Penetrant Examination r"
Site/Unit Summary No.:
Examination For:
Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-PT.1 12
/
0000232 Report No.:
2000P023 Page:
I oil Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
2-ISI-30A e
Location:
Pressurizer Desc'ipticfn: Nozzle - Safe End System ID: RC Component ID: W-I SizelLength:
6"/ 19" ThicklDia:
.719" inmitations: None Temp. Tool MFG:
Telatemp Serial No.:
NSP 128 Surface Temp.:
95 F
Surface Temperature of Comparator Block (if used): SideA:
N/A TF Side 8:
NA "F Gray Card (if used):
Not Used Lo Location:
TDC of Nozzle Surface Condition:
Blended Cleaner Penetrant Remover Developer Brand Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Type SKC-S SKL-HF/S SKC-S SKD-S2 Batch No.
97H1 I K 87C054 97Ht1K 97J04K Time Evap.
5 Dwell 10 Evap.
2 Develop 7
Time Exam Started:
14:45 Time Exam Completed:
16:00 Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
None Results:
NAD [
IND Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
Yes Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level 11
,,,Snature A1
-Date Reviewer Signau
_pt/
Blechinger, Todd P.
1~
-/1120 Hpalte Examiner LevcA N
-A Signature Date Site Review N/A I
inney, Charles R.
Dat Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review pate N/A I
Heater, Stephen B.
/
/
P12 501405 ISI
-p" Site/Unit Summary No.:
Examination For.
Liquid Penetrant Examination NSP I
P12 501935 ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
IS[-PT-1 12 1
0000232 Report No.:
2000P037 Page:
I of I
Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
2-4SI-5 Location: CONTAINMENT
==
Description:==
Nozzle to Pipe System ID: RC Component ID: W-1 3 Size/Length:
6" ThicklDia:
2.56" ULiltations: None Temp. Tool MFG:
PTC Instruments Serial No.:
3355 Surface Temp.:
106 "F
Surface Temperature of Comparator Block (If used): Side A:
N/A "F Side B:
°F Gray Card (if used):
Not Used Lo Locafton:
Top Dead Center Surface Condition:
Blended Cleaner Penetrant Remover Developer Brand Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Magnaflux Type SKC-S SKL-HFIS SKC-S SKD-S2 Batch No.
97H11K 87C054 97H11K 97J04K Time Evap.
5 Min Dwell 10 Min Evap.
2 Min Develop 7 MIn Time Exam Started:
13:00 Time Exam Completed.
14:45 Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
None Results:
NAD []
IND []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
Yes Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level tl Signature Date Reviewer S
t Date K
h, 51412000 Hailing, David A.
Examiner Level NIA Signature Date Site Review D I NIA I
Kinney, Charles R.
Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Date NIA I
Heater, Stephen B.
/
PUP Visual Examination of Component Supports and Snubbers 1q drCJ/*4
- 4 I SRte/Unet.
NSP I
P12 Repdut No.:
2000V393 o
Pot Sie/ni.
SP 1
12Procedure.
ISI-VT-2.0 Page:
1 of 3" Eammnay No.o F0137r Examination For:
l Procedure RevislonrFC:
Work Order No.:
8 I
99V`r2-1 0000232 Applicable Code: 1989 IS6 Drawing No.:
2-4SI-60B Location:
Aux Building
==
Description:==
Support A System ID: SI Component ID. H-1 SzeALeng%-
N/A Thick/Dia:
.7S" Limitations: See attached sketch.
Light Meter MFG:
N/A Serial No.:
WA Illumination:
N/A FLICDS Temp. Toot MFG:
WA Serial No.:
NWA Surface Temp.:
NWA 'F
. Gray Card.
1/32" Direct 1 1 Remote []
Surface Condition:
As Welded Visual EquipmentiAlds: Flashlight, Mirror, Neutral Gray Card Visual Examination:
Observed Condition All Components
- 1) External Obstruction
- 2) Cracks or Unear Ind.
- 3) Loose Parts
- 4) Missing Parts
- 5) Obstr.To Moving Parts
- 6) Wear
- 7) Corrosion
.8) Contaminants
- 9) Improper Weld Reinfor.
- 10) Physical Deformabon
-11) Misuse
- 12) Slipped Clamps
,13) Other (Describe)
- 14) Correct Settings
,15) Actual Setting
- 16) Serial No.
Constant Load Supports
- 17) Travel Stops In Place
- 18) Housing Damage
'Comments:
'None NAD IND WA See Comments Spring Supports
- 19) Off Scale High
- 20) Off Scale Low
- 21) Locking Device In Place
- 22) Spring Degraded
-23)
Gross Misalignment Mechanical Snubbers
_24)
Swing Clearance
- 25) Bent Extension Rod
- 26) Housing Damage 0
- Hydraulic Snubbers
- 27) Reservoir Level 28)Leakage
- 29) Piston Fully Extended Yes No o
NIA 30) Piston Fully Retracted MIA
- 31) Reservoir Inverted WA
- 32) Piston Damage NAD IND W/A See Conmments
",I
'.4
'.4
'.4
'Resuts" NAD W IND []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Examiner Level I1 Johnson, Jeffery.
I Reviewed Previous Data.
Date Reviewer J52000 Hailing. David A.
No Data 1
Signatu
Sde.JnILt NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501377 Examinabon For:
ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
ISI.V'r2.0 Procedure Revlsion/FC:
8 I SSVT2.1 Work Order No:
0000232 Report No.:
2000V393 Page-2 of 3
- ltL810c 4 Description of Limitation.
6" of weld on bottomn of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:NMDDEALS0WP2RFO2000PI2 SUPPLEMENTALPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL VT%200OV3 took,kI LjeffTf £C.4s
-S -
A
.S-O
,vow.04' b
wLAVd t'Ad 4
X0..
_!YL Limitations removal requirements:
None Radiabon field:
<-5mRIhr Examiner Level H ignatur Date Reviewer Signature Date Johnson, Jeffery KL I
5I25/2000 Hailing. David A.
I Examniner Level MIA A
ugnature Date SeRve WA I
U Kinney, Chattes R.
I LA M
jt Other Level WA Signature Date ANII Review Date WA I
Heater, Stephen B.
I 4',,,o
IP Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations SWlUnMt:
NSP I
P12 Summary No:
501377 Examination For.
ISl Proced Procedure:
ISI-VT.2.0 ure Revlsion/FC:
8 1 99VT2-I Work Order No.:
0000232 Report No.:
2000V393 Page:
3 of 3
Area Required (as shown In applicable code reference drawing)
Length 36.000 Wdth 2.000
= Total Area required 72.000 square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 60.000 sq I. InTotal area required (100%)
72.000 sq In.
Percent coverage
% (area required - area of limnitations; = area examnined)
To determine length of c rcumferential weld Note - Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000
- (PO) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 Inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 4006 2.5 2.875 903 14 14.0 4398 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 5027 35 40 12.57 18 18.0 5655 4
4..5 14.14 20 200 62.83 5
5.583 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 240 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77 1
Date' Site Feld Supervisor.
Visual Examination of Component Supports and Snubbers 4 6/4
' 2o Report No.:
20001/394 pa~z NSP 1
P12 Procedure-ISI-V'r-2.0 Page.
1 of 3
r~A4q fl "O..
Examination For ISI Proceaure RevLsio4VFC:
Work Order No:
8 I
99VT2.1 0000232 Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
2-4SI-60B Location.
Aux Building
==
Description:==
Support B System ID: SI Component ID: H-2 Size/Length:
WA ThicklDia:
.75" Limitations: See attached sketch.
Ught Meter MFG-N/A Serial No.:
N/A Illurrin Temp. Tool MFG:
N/A Serial No.:
N/A Gray Card:
1132" Direct R 1/64" Remote 5]
Surface Condition-A Visual Equipment/Aids. Flashlight, Mirror, Neutral Gray Card Visual Examination:
Observed Condition ation.
N/A FtJCDS Surface Temp.:
N/A
- F d=Welded m Welded All Components
- 1) External Obstruction
- 2) Cracks or Unear Ind.
- 3) Loose Parts
- 4) Missing Parts
- 5) Obstr. To Moving Parti
- 6) Wear
- 7) Corrosion
- 8) Contaminants
- 9) Improper Weld Reinfor
- 10) Physical Deformation
- 11) Misuse
- 12) Slipped Clamps "13)
Other (Descrbe)
- 14) Correct Settings
- 15) Actual Sething
- 16) Serial No.
Constant Load Supports
- 17) Travel Stops In Place
- 18) Housing Damage Comments*
None NAD IND NIA See Comments Spring Supports 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9
.9 9
9 Yes 9
-No v NIA N/A N/A
- 19) Off Scale High
- 20) Off Scale Low
- 21) Locking Device In Place
- 22) Spring Degraded
- 23) Gross Misalignment Mechanical Snubbers
- 24) Swing Clearance
- 25) Bent Extension Rod
- 26) Housing Damage Hydraulic Snubbers
- 27) Reservoir Level
- 28) Leakage
- 29) Piston Fully Extended
- 30) Piston Fully Retracted
- 31) Reservoir Inverted
- 32) Piston Damage NAD IND NIA See Comments 9O T
9o Results:
HAD Ea IND []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
MP7ý Ste/Unit Summary Wt*
Examiner Level 11 sign turet eiwr i
uDt Johnson, Jeffery M.
I 8 25/2000 Hailing. David A.
M Examiner Level N/A ASgfure Date Site Review h, e
NIA Kiny halsR Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Date N/A I
Heater, Stephen B.
4e_1_0 No
I Limitation Record hsp SiteiUnit NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501385 Exanination For:
ISI lSI-Vr.2.0 8
I 99VT2-1 0000232 Description of Limitation:
S" of weld on bottom of pads arm Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
Sketch of LUitabon-G.-IDOE-50P12RFO2000WI2 SUPPLEMENTALS°P2 SUPPLEMENTAL VF=M000V3
LJ(5 7 £.sT Sr P.4 3%p CAsy 5=
P4 mp C.ASW, !Y
/
-P S.
Y R
I-Umitabons removal requirements:
4None Radiation field.
< - 5 mR I hr Examiner Level 11 Johnson, Jeffery I.L Date Reviewer 512512000 HMlUng, David A.
Signature Date Sli;;fkre Procedure:
Procedure Revlslon/FC:
Work Order No:
PAd p
- 5.
is, Report No.:
2000V394 Page:
2 of 3
S/3110'0
Site/Unit NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
601385 Examination For:
ISi Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC.
Work Order No.:
ISI-VT-2.0 a
I 99VT2-1 0000232 Report No:
2000MV394 Page.
3 of 3
Area Required (as shown In applicable code reference drawing)
Length 36.000 Width 2.000 Total Area required 72.000 square Inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 60.000 sq In. ITotal area required (100%)
72.000 sq In.
= Percent coverage
% (area required - area of limitations a area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note -
Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000 (P0 3.1416
= Length 0.000 Inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 4006 2.5 2.875 903 14 14.0 4398 3
35 11.0 16 160 50.27 35 4.0 12.57 18 180 56.55 4
4.5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69 12 6
6625 20.81 24 24.0 7540 8
8 625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77 Site Field Supervlsor
Date:
f/-'Z )
Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations A4~cz~i
.3 Sdte Field Supewdsr.
Date:
iýl
-4v
ZVisual Examination of oomponent Supports and Snubbers A&t Sie/nt SP
/Report No.: -2000V388 Site/Unit NSP I
P12 Procedure:
ISI-Vr.2.0 Page:
1 of 3
Summary No.:
501390 Procedure Revlsion/FC.
8 I
99VT2-1 Examination For.
IS!
Wodr Order No.:
0000232 Applicable Code 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
24si-60-b Location:
Aux Building
==
Description:==
Support C System ID. SI Component ID. H-3 Size/Length: _
WA Thick/Dia.
.75" Umitations-See attached sketch i
Lg.*a.n m
.u,'
rlewr mrr.:
MIA Serial No.:
WA Illumination WA FtJCDS Temp. Tool MFG:
WA Serial No.:
N/A Surface Temp :
WA F
Gray Card.
132* Direct a 1V4 Remote []
Surface Condition:
NIA Visual EquipmentlAjds:
Flashlight, Mirror, Neutral Gray Card NAD IND WIA See Comments Spring Supports
- 1) External Obstruction v
- 2) Cracks or Linearlnd.
%o
- 3) Loose Parts
_0
- 4) Missing Parts
_0
- 5) Obstr. To Moving Parts
%. o; r6) Wear V_
- 7) Corrosion
- 18) Contarrinants V
I 9) Improper Weld Reinfor.
!10) Physical Deformation 41 111) Misuse WO 4l2 ) Slipped Clamps 113) Other (Describe) h14) Correct Settings Yes No
- 15) Actual Setting MIA h16) Serial No WA iConstant Load Supports 6 7) Travel Stops In Place I8) Housing Damage 7, '
Woments" Nonie N/A
- 19) Off Scale High
- 20) Off Scale Low
- 21) Locking Device In Place
- 22) Spring Degraded
- 23) Gross Misalignment Mechanical Snubbers
- 24) Swing Clearance
- 25) Bent Extension Rod
- 26) Housing Damage Hydraulic Snubbers
- 27) Reservoir Level
- 28) Leakage
- 29) Piston Fully Extended
- 30) Piston Fully Retracted
- 31) Reservoir Inverted
- 32) Piston Damage NAD IND WA See Coninents
'I, VP
'WI
'WP
'WI
- 10 Results' NAD [
IND I]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Examiner Level a Sigl Date Reviewer Signature Date Oohnson, Jeffery M.
1 00 Hailing, David A.
C L
f, M Examiner Level N/A Sig re Date Site Review Date WA 1
lnnoy, Charle;.
Z-1-0 Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Date I WA I
Heater, Stephen B.
I I Visual Examination:
lObserved Condition All Components No
iEP Site/Unit NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501390 Examination For.
ISI Liitation Record Procedure:
ISI-Vr-2.0 Procedure RevlslonIFC:
8 1 99VT2-1 Work Order No.:
0000232
,46a d, 7z /
Report No.:
2000V3 ff Page-2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
6" of weld on bottom of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
G VIDDEAL5%PI2RFO2000IPI2 SIPPLEMENTAL'P12 SUPPLEMENTAL VI12001O3 b' je(
&S7&
£4s sr
,op CA~Sw 4/o&'
10 C.
1
- A'ov &Ak i
Sr CASW -7 jUrmtations removal requirements:
!None
- Radiabon field.
< 5 mrlhr Examiner Level II Sagna'Date Revewer Signaturea Johnson, Jeffery 1.
I
- 55Mo, Hailing, David A.
I
(.
Examiner Level A
Si Date Site Review
- WA I
Kinney. Charles R.
I 1/
Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review nature Date WA I
Heater, Stephen B.
I Sketch of Umitation:
PAI
ý1=11
A I
L.
Determination of Percerot Coverage for Surface Examinations SiteIUnit NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501390 Examination For.
IS!
Procedure:
Procedure RevislonFC:
Work Order No:
ISI-VT.2.0 8
I 99VT2-1 0000232 Report No.:
2000V388 Page 3
of 3
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length 36.000
- Wdth 2.000 Total Area required 72.000 square Inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 60.000 sq. In. [Total area required (100%)
72.000 sq. In Percent coverage
% (area required - area of limitabons area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note-Diameter refers to actual external d'ameter pot pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000 (Pi)
.141L' Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Aclual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference i Size Diameter Circumference 2
2375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 18 160 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4.5 14.14 20 200 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 6912 6
6625 2081 1
24 24.0 75.40 8
8625 27.10 1
30 300 9425 10 10.75 3377 Site Field Supervisor Iu I
M11131111M Date:
JW Visual Examination of Component Supports and Snubbers
/f/cJhta 22 Report No.,
200OV389 P
Sdte/Unit.
/
P12 Procedure ISI-VT-2.0 Page:
1 of 3
Summary No.:
501396 Procedure Revlslon/FC:
8 I
99VT2-1 Examination For.
ISl Work Order No.:
0000232 Applicable Code: 1989 ISO Drawing No.:
24s-40-b Location:
Aux Buildling Desaiptlon Support!)
System ID: SI Component ID: H-4 Size/Length:
NIA Thick/Dla:
.75" Umitations. See Attached Sketch.
Light Meter MFG:
N/A Serial No.:
NIA IlluIminatinn WIA Ei W-'e Temp. Tool MFG:
WA Serial No.:
WA Surface Temp.:
WA
- F Gray Card.
13W Direct &a 1/64" Remote []
Surface Condition:
N/A Visual Equipment/Aids:
Flashlight. Mirror, Neutral Gray Card Visual Examination:
Observed Condition All Components HAD IND N/A
- 1) External Obstruction
- 2) Cracks or Linear Ind.
%0
- 3) Loose Parts
- 4) Missing Parts V
- 5) Obstr. To Moving Parts
- 6) Wear
- 7) Corrosion__
- 8) Contaminants
- 9) Improper Weld Reinfor.
v,
- 10) Physical Deformation
- 11) Misuse
,4
- 12) Slipped Clamps
- 13) Other (Describe)
- 14) Correct Settings Yes
- 15) Actual Setting
- 16) Sedal No.
N Constant Load Supports
- 17) Travel Stops in Place
- 18) Housing Damage Comments:
None.
See Comments Spring Supports No v N/A IA I/A
- 19) Off Scale High
- 20) Off Scale Low
- 21) Locking Device In Place
- 22) Spring Degraded
- 23) Gross Misalignment Mechanical Snubbers
- 24) Swing Clearance
- 25) Bent Extension Rod
- 26) Housing Damage Hydraulic Snubbers
- 27) Reservoir Level
- 28) Leakage
- 29) Piston Fully Extended
- 30) Piston Fully Retracted
- 31) Reservoir Inverted
- 32) Piston Damage NAD IND N/A See Comments V0
'4
%10
%0 W4
'I
'4 Results:
NAD 6E IND [J Percent Of Coverage Obtained : 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Level 11 Sig t
Date Reviewer Sr9 natue Date Johnson, Jeffery Mi.
1
&7f...-
51=520 Hailing. David A.
ini TM 6///,-r)J Examiner Level N/A JSlIgture Date'St Review
ýý pue I
Datel W
I(ny Chare R.
- 1.
Other Level W/A Signature DefteAI eiwDt WA I
Heater, Stephen B.
I
Site/UnIt NSP I
P12 Summary No.:
501396 Exarnination For
~
ISI Limitation Record Procedure:
Procedure Revison/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-VT-2.0 8
1 99VT2-1 0000232 Report No-*
200OV389~
Page-2 of 3
Description of Umblaion.
6" of weld on bottomn of pads are Inaccessible due to concrete pad.
Sketch of Uniltatlon:
G UDDOEM5P12RF020O0P12 SUPPLIMIENTAUtPI SUPPLEMENrrALvr200cw3
%co~~ Lk7-i tvohCýsU Ldzicd
.4/0*'
wcLA
c r
ý
-I Lirritations remcwal requlremrenta, Nonte Radiation field:
<C5 mRlhr Examiuner Level U Johnson, Jeffery IL I
I Slggntjr Date IReviewer 512512000 Halting, David A.
/o
)
Sr CA S v o
.N
'-0-C.
- 4
a
.j'.
Date 6 t1loo
4 of Percent ZZ SDetermination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations PC az 3
Site/Unit:
NSP I
PI2 Summary No.
501396 Examination For.
ISI Procedure:
Procedure RevisloniFC Work Order No.:
1SI.VT-2.0 8
1 99VT2-1 0000232 Report No:
2000V389 Page:
3 of 3
Area Required (as shown In applicable code reference drawlng)
Length 36.000 Wdth 2.000
=Total Area required 72.000 square Inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 60.000 sq hi. Total area required (100%)
72.000 sq. in.
Percent coverage
% (area required - area of limitations = area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note-DMameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
DIameter 0.000 (P) 3.1416 SLength 0.000 Inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter I Circumference 12 1275 4006 14 14.0 43.98 is 16.0 50.27 18.0 18 Site Field Supervisor.
Date. 4-'
2 2.375 7.46 2.5 2.875 9.03 3 3.5 11.0 35 4.0 1
12.57 Pope Actual I
(Length)
Size Diameter I Ckcumference 56.55
Site/Unt:t
'Summary No-1
,Eiamination F'or Visual Examinatl~ion-61 Coponent Supports iifd SthiubbeI~
N~f' P12R~ppft No'0 2000 V314
-NPI P2Procedure:
1SI-VT.2.6
'Page; IoY.1
'W01412
- ocedUr&Revisiin/FGý J-if9WV2.1 Appffcab~e Code:- - 989
-ltrajNo:249-ai.64 xto:
Aux"
-Description: Su~pprtA System ID: RH4 rcomponent ID:.H-I Sletieogth:
VA Thic/Die:
MIA Uimitationc -None LlghtMelerMiG&
NiA
~
ito:W[
illurfiiriatiob, V A tJO Temp.;ToQI MFG; NIA Serial No-;.
VA,-
!Surfacdejempz AL
ýF Gfiy'Calrd:,
1/32 Dwed-i 164"AFemoteo (J-urface C~ndillon:.
Pafned,-As Wealied vjsuýi Equlpment/oes:
ls. g rrCmr,'Sn~Nete ryCr Miual Examlnaliofi:
Observed Condition All Components_
NAD IND
- 1) Etehiai Obsiruction
- 2) CracKs or UnbarlInd.
- 3) Loose ORarts
-4) Missing Parts
-5) Obstr. To Wv~ving Parts
- 7) Corroslon
- 8) -Contaminants V
,Q) Imporoper Weld Refinfor.
w.'
1 0) t'hys~lca Dfdrmaiion
- 12) Sripped Clamps-
- 13) Other(Describe)
-14) Correct Settings
-- __Yes 15ý) ýAcual -setting
- 161 Serial-No.
NIA See Cohmments t Ii S0 pot
'10) Off Scale Hgh-.
'20) Off Scale LoW
~
M), LOddg bevioe in Place
-~
~22)Sprin De~fad~d
- 23) 'Gross Misalignment Mdctianlcal &9iibbere
- 24) dozi Clearance
~
~
6 2
q-kislg Dama~ge
' Hyraulk&Snubb~iv
- 27) f~es~tvdir Level
- 28) Leakage V-
- 29)
Ei(nTiyEtended No V.N/A 30) P orifntby Retractbd V/A
,1)Rsvbrnvte V/A
- 32) pi~to ~h, iage
,Constant Load Sopporti
- 17) ;Travel Stops'fn Place
- 18) ffoding Damage
,NAb INDý WA -8eeC~himbntts
'V
'V
'V
'V I
VP Comments;
'*fr Cracking bt basý o ikiily ptortýý Itfero-n-6, Aepj"R #4#00. !Crrený co-nditon ls more severe than previously reported.
Resilts*:
NADfJD IND J Pefoerit~fCov age0,btainedt;W%;
-16i
'eiwdPrevious Data.
Ye Examinet Level Reiee D814nau' Auer; Robert 6.
H
/2Z0 aflfftqj~aVldAX I
/
Examiner Level NWA DateXLefat le~ve NtA I
~~CasR.
I Other Level NIA Signaure
--Date A1,11 Review' pt NIA
-I Heater, Stiphen'&
I'
CýOmqeqts; t and I t.,]Rofteasýtnd 2 craFcimý-.i.65" L:ff0in'VOlt
-'fftibv-q-h',0'rout' I P L'lioM.bolt aMpi ihrpygo ato6t across
'top *fP0JdestaJ$,0Yerj:0nlerabd doWffbackeldi6(
d*,
- i. iý 6ý0'ý odi d,0.4!'-L p"th.
qý:uý4ymA Z44 - Praawd fmn Wiarea i6"-hgrout and #10110 lJASW,6fprOfA t6ýb of,*
4ýýL
ýqpojpe jjgtj& I btý ni M biid &V n-n,' jhJkedff6 iduf
-such th#tlhdbntlreldnUth of gidUt 3 leing upsi!t'by (Ossftri OA61,
,4,týý n4-aa 2.3 Pae 2 ý 8 RWOO NO.:
i-0dbVS14_
2
-lof
)Kt Otte:
Date.
Am, SumrnaVNýý 50144,29 F-)tafdnor Auiar,,IýObertM Exadner WA
-Ott*r. NfA plwWkbid k4jý6rt Revfeweý; Halling,04vid
'te4bl.-- -NIA SWRW&f.- 10*il 0*04 Levei.' IVA A-NI(t?0vjew.--
eater;*
Supplemental Report SummaryNo.: 501412 Examiner: Auer;Robert G.
Examiner:. WA Other:
/A Level:
- n.
Reviewer: JlallingDavfd A Level:
NIA Site Reyiew: Kinney, Charles Level:
N/A ANII Reiew-. Heater, Stephen Report No.,
2000V314 Page:
'3 of
'9' Date:________
Rl.
Date: P 2
-At)
Comments: Northeast End Sketch or Photo:
G:.VDDEALS0?I2RFO2000W12 SUPPLEMENTALTPI2 SUPPLEMENTAL VTf2000V3
- 1 I
Supplemental Repbrt Summary No.: 501412 Examiner Auerj Robert G.
Examiner; NIA, Other NIA Level:
li Level:
N/A Level:
N4/A Report No.:
12000V314 Page:
4 of Re~iever Hailing, David.4 Site Review, Kinney, Charles R.
ANi[.Review:. Heater, Stephen J.
Date:.,
-t-3 Date:
Comments:, Middle Sketch or Photo, GPDDF-ALS0EJ2AFNO2L0T2.SUPPýý-IpI2 SUVpL TALT0
SupplemenitalReport Summary No-- 501412 Exardner. Auer, Robert G.,
Exarniner~ NIA Ot~hein WA Report No.-
00V1 Page:
5of
.LrA
- Level, uI
-Reviewer~ Hillihq, DavIdA Date 310 t~e:WA Site Review: Iinhey.CharlesMR Date:
Level:
NWA ANJI Review: Heater.tteohenam Date; Comments: Southwlest Eifd Sketch or Phoo:
G.VDDEALs0oPI2RFo2ooolp2 SUPPLEmENTALVPj SU~pLEMENTAL VT\\2000\\3
,CoffiriiW Ndne pa qz Fý0009---
ý
'Pa9b:
S
'Reviewer Balflng; DeMd A.
note.;
00ý0ý-
J-0-nneyo.ChadesX ANI-RevT&r ABiterStephen-M Dite:
SUmnfary No-,. S01411 Pýýqer-- XtierRob'ed G.
B(a NIA
-WA.
bthor:: WA Sketchbr Phot6: G-V6D&LWI*6266ýPIZzuppLEMemun2suFpLEmt*TALW*Oyý
D-atW.
Prepa!ed Py; PA,AE -. 2.AF A fla cA tt,,ad NEEMISIMS13RDINTEWAL
-- cFttPARdyDI&6SItl0N
'ENGf DIS "UNIT-2,-:2000 ROP-O-it NurfiberiMOV314 ltem'-Descrlpfian: 921 "RHR Heat b(changer Support A msdroaficy: vatidg.§ trodks ho*_in70dd0tdIbiplUt; I'& Itil
- riý StiiktuWeiýglrie "'tit AES oi o ers 66htdct6d foli Qf lheýsupJ6ýt I,,
boffijýbfi. NSP;)bJ40W#Vftb theiCd6fdjrhiMaTiofi-th4t tlýd -§0s-`eTvedpp, T Ao not reprp"Ot,,priy skiýiufaf-64iq&e6n-ýi& Pedestill; See-lottathed lýfter.'f'romt)oct6ýtbtutýf6Oýu!Hýj-o-.-V'y-.-ý-dd-ted M4' l2,'2bJ00'.lh-tssyppott Iý d0ertiblb Inits*W06-utid §4NWibn-.
NOTIFIED: P115/,09 1500
AUTO
ý40 Q'gde)t Are..,-50420,5 tN G
&43324&S iýPoj 474sýo Y4.-mu).337 ý444S
-Mayý22,2-000 i&.-*p-aul -W'Jovy Nofthern S'Jtaieý13owerCoxnpany
-Praifid Islabd NUcI&vt'GeneratiDg'Plant:
47-1ý Wiiikoiiade Dfivb Eat
-Welch, NN-'-550§9.
Deaf ý&. Hij6Vy:
Subi6et: EiIg'Ine'm*n Vvaýadons 4-ISI13imifinadonkepcds -,Unitl
-RON4ýý,'WVIIUn 2000Vjl406tWV13P.000 Aý-tomatedEngine-en'ngServices'Corp.-(AI19)'haseviluateýd-thesoleýtt-,C-_ppaiffvOlvipgthe Tbeýewaluafion sWeadw w
.he;o:pcm rpVrind'thittho Ao ae
.1.1 no med "ncern that the extefit Of th &add
&ýO ua Ott e-I cmfullyxorrýper6o ve gedoiL lb 0* c=U -(h at were obseryed in the'subi ecit'Bi repdd& *t
&Wm mes ftl 190-
--i-i '-th --h ý i ý i -Aiiý !4 ho, iiwewing ep qtogra
_,n U op"llon otgrpwn or d may fx paifl y lffiioughtýcýaqýmte, They app=-to-;"bayýýurredAningtheihaýldr'!g,"of the 6-tdudýxqut
,du4ng)origin;dýWl4tfdh,6f th&Iii-Aes
,ýeyi 6A, of ithp, pedesW smm-kw-4. drý%vings
'298-3,&-S-w0gý -t)iW t e
-NF 80" 13 wtha th -dac'h bolisind
,c*ýs p4 ilit IdVe-any zdversýiffe& on
'Therefb%
btr will not, tic
'y bfthese anchbis.
ofIrAon, Ihd-6b$e'-r-v-ed'd--Wc9 do Apt T-qm- '-w-
-S 6ý nvf ibe4pdeital,
ýfiihve quýifions, pile= give Tw a Call. -7hankyou for the, oppWwfiýy to be-,of se mi"M to Trairielslahd &id NSP.
AN. Seflur
'P=ident
-PAGE
summary N~o Exarnination Fo Visal xam inatiqn~d ofCmponent upporsrid ntibr L*~
Report o.*
2600V313 it
'NSP Pt P12 Pzr:
iS! -VT-2.0ae 1
fi01419
- Procedure Rev~ionlFC
I 1
09VT2-1 151 Wark Order No.:
00(10232
,Appllcable Code; '1989 A
SO Ibrawingho.,,
2-1149a Ldofatior RKR PIT 21 kSyitemiID-: RH Component.1ID; H-2:
Size/Length:
NIA T11iWIla.
-NJA Uniatibis' 'Noti-a Light Meter*AFG:
NIA Serial No.t WA Aoufininf5on W/A
.FUC06 Temp. Tool MFG.
NWA f~edbleNo..
W/A
-Sutface T~mO.:
MIA
- F Gray Card:
1/3' irect -ý5 i)4Rew e
-jJ Surf~eCopd Orr,#1tt,~Wle Visual Equipmebt/AldsFiaslgt irr rmr,$~clieta ryCr Vrisual EurtInon; Observed1 Conditiorl All Cornponento
'I) Exiemnaiblý tron
- 2) JCracksor lerld
- 3) Loose Parti
- 4) is~rg aft
- 5) -,Obstr. To Moving Fartt NAb IND v--4 6). Wear
- 7) Corfiioh
- 8) Cont~arrinants V
9 rproper Vldfleinfor', y,
- 10) -PhyalcalDetidnattoh V
,IlMi Vuse
- 12) Slipped Clamp
- 13) Ofthe(Des&be) i4) Coffect Setting
_ _Yes
- 15) Actual Setting
- 18) Seria[No.
Conftint Lad Supports
- 17) Travel Stopsi PlnPacd I8 n'a~g I
WA
$Seo I momirxtqsSpring suwports 49
- 10) Off Scale-Hlbh
__,21-2Lbabihg evice In PlAcd 122)
_p~g1Dflegra'o z23) Gt6as Misallhignent Mechanlool Snubbem 2~sent Eotiisio&Rd 4-Hydniuld Snubberk
- 26) Leiage,
- 29) Pistoh Fully Extended
___ o i,
-W~A 36) Piston f~ll Retmaced
!A j1) Reservoirnverted
/A
- 32) Plistdnfl'mboe MA IND NI/A Sii4Coniinients
.4 9
'9 Comments:
None Results:
NAD I]
IND 91 Percent Of Coverage Obtained >'SO%--
yil
!Rtm vi~dveiwvu
'Yes Exatniner LeVel -II r/atelwe Aur beftG.
1017J60 Reier qg,".I
-AR Exarniiner Level NIA f
nWTJato Site~eview 1
Date N/A I
Kinney;Chadds it Ofthr Level N/A Signatre
'Date ANII Reviw.
Dt WA/HatrtehnB
.Summaty Noz:.514ip EUa~nbnr:Auer, RobertG.
ixamriner 'WA
.,Le~el.
11 Revoiewr. 'HalJfiqUpId A1 I;e N/A Site Review-Ktnnudy1Clrrlea M.
1LevI. ~IA At Rvfew ~Hetf. Stephen 13; Reporit No,.
!IOOOV313 Page:
12 df--'
[Date*,~
j
--comments,
- 2) and 10) - Northeast End - CrAck iunfrom bolt iioi lift brbU4 I.2' L
- Southweat End-.CriAc runs from bolt area throuaghgrtheIo biofru fr1'aoui1i
!pposrte dIrection along base cfsrout4arqtnd corne olgrodt to an rauti heupr,$5
- Uiddli, - 'Ciickiijs frinb&Iojjaroi ftgroiit.ý
S~uooIeiental Report Summary ao.: 501419 Examiner Auer, Robert G.
Exami~ner WA Other: WA Report No.:
26D0V313 Page:
3 of
,~
L~evel:
11 Reviddwer Halting, david A Level:
WA Site Review: 19inney, Charfe's R.
Level:
K/A ANII Review; Heater, Stephen M.
- Date, bate:
Comments.
Southwest End Skeldi or Photo: G-itýLý12 20\\lSUPPWAMENTALýPl2 SUPPLEMEIWJAL VTX2OoVý F"
Supplemental Report Sunmary No.: 501419 Examiner. Auer, Robert G.
Exaniner: WA OOther N/A Comients: Middle ANP Level:
If Reviewer Hailing, David A.
Date: ___/,____
Level:
,Ste Review. kinney, Charles R.
Date,-
--4/A6
- Level, NIA AN*l Revfew, Heater, Stephen B.
Date:
Sketch or Photo: GjDDEIM 2RO2Pj2 SUPPLEMENTAuIp SUPpLaAENT. Vf'*000Va dp IfacJlk,1cýe2 2c/
Report No.:
2000V313 Page:
4 of
Summary No:ý 601419 Examiner' Auer, Robeirt G3.
Examiner: NIA Other: NIA Comments:
Northeast End
,4 7jacrmaJ 2zl Sup~plemental Report Ag
.57-8
'Report No:
200OV313
- Page, j;
ofX Level:
.11 Reviewer -Halting, David A.
Level:
k/A-Site Review:, Kinney, Chailei R.
DAte;,
'c~
Level:
N/A ANII keVewr Reater, Stephen B.
Date.'-
Sketch 6r Phto0:
G-,VDDEAL5OjPj2R~FO200 SZSp P IUI UPEMNA2f20V
tA*w
-wNa-mwns zrdwuamwdns wooozo.4uzta6gmaaivo o@qd jdiýjxs auojj 'sj 71, pf" VN YIN 48AGI.
V/N' :jOtlio VIN -;Iwiujzxa qtttos "'ON kmýWng
-am
'3
- 06ed MA000r- '.,ON v6daH s ý
'5)
4 #aeý n,.Cj 7-Lf Age-7 EkGINEERING'ISI 3110 19TEFWAL-Di E
-ISCR PANCYýDISPOSIT16N VNIT 2 - 2000' Reobrt Number.206OV313 Item bescriPti-Oh'. #2-1 F3HRHeat Exchangers'upport B DistmOgindY.- Van"ous cradks-noted' inpeddstal gt6ul.
Disposition: Structural ehqlnebiti:ýt AESwere, corftadedjo review'the Subjeot coni'ýdition.'NSP cdncdrs",wittt,;theffýdetdrWn ai !he ý
-a6nih Obsbfvbd 6racks Oo'n6t re" dfied present any str, uctural degrWati6if-of ýýb pedekal.ýýee dtta elte t
-M6 P46 r, 6ýt I'd 46'Pa a I --H ajýv. 04
.200 is;support y
pý Mgy 22,
ý0. Thl isoperpbJe'lrfRg-fis,'fbUhd-b6ndhion.
SM NOT1FlW-,5A5/00 166d
'Pr6oar6d By:
,Reviewed'Bv:_
Date: -,0- -Z7--60 Dale; I
I
-PAGE -7 REFVRT #
AUT09ATSD 3060 F4iqloýýING SERViCVý 'CORP.
=.-(6jO)3S7-444S May2Z ý000 Mr. Paw Mj6vy Nýrdheýn-StatesTýOwdr Company Prbifie Island1juclear Gener
- 1..
atjng.Pja&,
1717 Wako-fi* POe BW welch'.,NN'55689 DearMr.-Hajovr.
Sy4bjwt; -EnginwiinglgvWuAongoftltxaiiin,*6on,ýle*-op.ýtk -Uhit 2 13.and, V314,61ed ýjh/2000 Aýi6mated-Enginecm'ng'SeMees-,Cdr
ýA&O-ageVgiua iý;bject Mo Oger,ýýtal Heat-Exch
-,gMUj Ci"ýg' In ffiC -gýotýwere. observed find' ýýaidatbd in -1996.
'týýevzaua'6'oitstated.t"hbLt-lbýýe'tffckg*i,ýere hWifftiettaclokýf t4-c gtoýtjfid thit týe phAfit;,R6W-
-th
'10 d6d
,,,ýycr,.eýev ubifi&il
, mmen t1fatft extdfifff thecWdn&h6uld be lnvesýgatea carýf Wly fýqrdper c6
'Me cracks fha't were-Observed in fl-feý-sUbjecýBffepoftý afe thdt wdftqbOb&4 in.1986.
exracks-baveriotgrownlor
,ýAidefi6d in tbb past 14L
-TkhW cýýW d-
-I th
-ftugh the con=te.'IbeyVpmýtohavo-omui;ýauring theshtitiidýgof.&cýioncreteýnd*dýt 1ýeviewof ihe-pedestal strucfurgdmwings,(N-Fýý!W'3 &.ý5andtý313-i)!§ýhowiýatýhebdcii b6ltsinflie.pedesWksVPd eiit of
'.cracks HN6 I
-.'b&iWfijffiý obýý cpcki do" ti-d' 20f týý_
(,iep my sf rud tu&l.*gra
.Ityouhave any quoitionsplease give moacafl. --*rbariýufor-lhe poortuni 46btofseryiýeto Siboetely, eg.
A.V.'Sefl u-r Presidenit PAGE
'?
0%-ý
.!7-660 VX3
/11(4c,6/
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 PREPARED BY:
,.-..- -M7 REVIEWED BY:
APPROVED BY:.
(
.c -
ANII REVIEW:
Superintendent M&MRN EFFECTIVE DATE:
/
1.0 PURPOSE This procedure provides instruction for identifying, quantifying and recording of limitations encountered while performing examinations under the ISI program.
2.0 REFERENCES
This procedure complies with the applicable portions of the following referenced documents:
2.1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code:
Sections V and XI, 1986 edition, no addenda (Monticello - Third Interval)
- Sections V and XI, 1989 edition, no addenda (Prairie Island - Third Interval) 2.2 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide - 1.150 "Ultrasonic Testing of Reactor Vessel Welds during Preservice and Inservice Examinations", (Rev. 1 dated Feb. 1983).
2.3 Code case N-460 Altemative Examination Coverage for Class 1 and Class 2 Welds - Section XI, Division 1 2.4 ISI NDE Manual procedure
- ISI-NDE-0 "Equipment, Personnel and Material Reporting".
2.5 Metals and Materials Resources Procedure
- MMRN 2.3 "ISI Examination Program".
2.6 ISI Administrative Manual procedures
"* ISIA-1.4 "Preparation of Relief Request from ASME Section XI Code Requirements"
"* ISIA-2.2 "ISI Field Activities - Preparation and Control Page 1 of 12
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 3.0 APPLICABILITY 3.1 This procedure is applicable to examinations performed at Xcel Energy's Nuclear Generating Plants.
3.2 This procedure is to be followed when it has been determined that there is a limitation which prevents obtaining full coverage of an area or volume as stated by the applicable examination procedure.
- For ultrasonic examinations, this would mean less than all of the required scans and/or a reduction of required scan path for one or more scans.
4.0 DEFINITIONS 4.1 Limitation - something that limits, restraint : An obstacle to the performance of an examination procedure.
4.2 Evaluation - to determine the significance, worth, or condition of, usually by careful appraisal and study 4.3 Practical - "of, relating to, or manifested in practice or action : not theoretical or ideal; concerned with voluntary action and ethical decisions. Useful." For this application this is interpreted to mean, for a specific case the benefits of a proposed action outweigh the negative aspects of that action.
5.0 PREREQUISITES 5.1 Personnel Requirements
- Examination personnel certification and eye examinations shall be documented in accordance with ISI-NDE-0.
- Nondestructive examination personnel shall be certified to a minimum of Level I in the appropriate method to operate equipment and Level II to interpret test results.
6.0 EQUIPMENT This item is not applicable to this procedure. If altemate methods are required to augment coverage, that work shall be done under a separate procedure.
Page 2 of 12
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 7.0 INSTRUCTIONS 7.1 Initial Examination Where the examiner is not able to complete a full examination as dictated by applicable procedure, the following steps shall be taken;
- Complete original examination on accessible portions
- Make sketch which includes dimensions defining location and size of limitations using a report format similar to that shown in Fig 3.
Describe the limitation including what it is and how it interferes with the exam.
State what appears to be required to remove the limitation using a report format similar to that shown in Fig 3.
- For volumetric examinations, construct a surface profile using a surface contour gauge and perform a thickness profile (typically one reading each 1/2" in a line) of the area that encompasses the code required volume. For UT that would include the available scanning surface.
Record radiation field information on the report (this may require assistance from the health physics group).
Sign and date the data sheet then forward it to the Xcel Energy's Field Supervisor.
7.2 Evaluation
- The data gathered by the initial examiner shall be reviewed by the Xcel Energy's field supervisor / designee to determine if altemate methods may be used to achieve additional coverage.
- If altemate methods would provide additional coverage, a review of the benefit versus the required resources (radiation dose, time, cost etc.) to achieve that coverage shall be performed by the Xcel Energy's field supervisor to determine if that action is practical (see para 7.3).
If it is determined that the entire examination volume or area cannot be examined due to interference by another component or part geometry, a reduction in examination coverage on any Class 1 or Class 2 weld may be accepted provided the reduction in coverage for that weld is less than 10%. The applicable examination records shall identify both the cause and percentage of reduced examination coverage (see para 7.4).
Page 3 of 12
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 7.3 Alternate methods to achieve coverage
"* For surface examinations, MT and PT may be interchanged / intermixed as appropriate to the material and the conditions.
"* For volumetric examinations, RT may be substituted for or augment UT assuming the ability to drain the line, and that the wall thickness / diameter is within a practical range.
"* For UT, use of other angles, full node or node and one half calibrations, skewed scans or approach from another surface to achieve additional coverage shall be considered.
7.4 Determining Coverage Achieved When evaluation of initial and altemate examination methods results in examinations which do not provide full coverage, a determination of percent coverage shall be made. The required examination coverage is defined by applicable figures in ASME Sect XI.
"* For surface examinations, a worksheet similar to that shown in Fig 4 shall be completed.
"* For volumetric examinations, a worksheet similar to that shown in Fig 5 or 6 (ultrasonic examinations) shall be completed.
7.5 Should the evaluation show that 90% weld coverage has been achieved, attach all related information to the original NDE report and no further action is required.
7.6 Contractor procedures for performing examinations utilizing automated equipment (e.g. reactor vessel and nozzle safe-end exams) shall be reviewed by an Xcel Energy's level III in the appropriate method to ensure the requirements for identifying, quantifying and recording of limitations encountered are adequately addressed.
7.7 When it has been determined that the maximum examination coverage practically achievable for a code required item is less than required; a relief request is required to be submitted to the NRC (refer to ISIA 1.4).
8.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA This item is not applicable to this procedure.
Page 4 of 12
I XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 9.0 REPORTING 9.1 Information addressed in Fig's 3, 4, 5 and 6 (as applicable) shall be reported.
9.2 Information for examinations that are required to meet Reg. Guide 1.150 shall also include the following from Appendix A - Alternate Method; 7.c "The best estimate of the portion of the volume required to be examined by the ASME Code that has not been effectively examined such as volumes of material near each surface because of near-field or other effects, volumes near interfaces between cladding and parent metal, volumes shadowed by laminar material defects, volumes shadowed by part geometry, volumes inaccessible to the transducer, volumes affected by electronic gating, and volumes near the surface opposite the transducer. Sketches and/or descriptions of the tools, fixtures and component geometry which contribute to incomplete coverage should be included."
9.3 Reference System Recording of limitations shall be based on the reference system shown in the original examination procedure.
9.4 Documentation A picture of the limitation should be taken and added to the description, preferably in a digital format.
10.0 RECORDS 10.1 Inservice inspection examinations shall be incorporated in the ISI records. See Metals and Materials Resurces North Procedure 2.3 "iSI Examination Program".
10.2 Records of other examinations shall be the responsibility of the organization requesting the examination.
Page 5 of 12
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 Figure 1 Example of UT scan coverage I
IID t
t 0%
Page 6 of 12 I
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 Figure 2 Example of UT, one sided exam, supplemental coverage FF f
Y,
/
Co V I.
Page 7 of 12
/5111 2 e /Z XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 Figure 3 Limitation Data Sheet Initial exam report #
ISO #
Procedure #
Item #
Description of Limitation Sketch of Limitation Limitation removal requirements Radiation field Examiner~
Date:
Page 8 of 12
/I/
o3/f2Ž S
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 Figure 4 Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations This is a sample form only Initial exam rpt #
ISO #
Applicable Code figure #
Procedure #
Item #
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length
- Width _
= Total area required square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined sq. in. / Total area required (100%)
sq. in.
= Percent coverage _%
(area required - area of limitations = area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note - Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter
- (Pi) 3.1416
= Length inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4.5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77 1
1 1
_1 Xcel Energy's Field Supervisor:
Date:
Page 9 of 12 I
d~ie.Ahe4J 2**)
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 Figure 5 Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe This Is a sample form only Initial exam rpt #
Procedure #
ISO #
Item #
Applicable Code figure #
45 deg Scan 1 _
% length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 -
% length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 _
% length X _
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 _
% length X _
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
% total for 45 deg Other deg - -
(to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 -
% length X _
% volume of length / 100 =--.
. % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 -
% length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 _
% length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 _
% length X_
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine;
% total for complete exam Example - 45 deg scan 1 = 63% plus supplemental 60 deg scan 1 = 28% (of remaining required scan volume) for total of 91% coverage for scan 1 volume. Repeat for the remaining scans, add together and divide by the # of scans (typically 4).
Xcel Energy's Field Supervisor:
Date:
Page 10 of 12
XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2 Figure 6 Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Vessels This is a sample form only Initial exam rpt #
Procedure #
ISO*#
Item #
Applicable Code figure #
0 deg Planar Scan
% length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for 0 deg 45 deq Scan 1 -
% length X _
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 -
% length X _
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 _
% length X _
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 _
% length X_
_ % volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
% total for 45 deg 60 deg Scan 1 _
% length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 _7_
% length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 _
% length X_
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 -
% length X_
_ % volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
% total for 60 deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # angles to determine;
% total for complete exam Note: Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be calculated and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination.
Xcel Energy's Field Supervisor: _
Date:
Page 11 of 12
I XCEL ENERGY METALS & MATERIALS RESOURCES NORTH INSERVICE INSPECTION - NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TITLE:
Limitations to NDE NUMBER:
ISI-LTS-1 Revision 2
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES Title block changed NSP to Xcel Energy and Materials & Special Processes to Metals &
Materials Resources North.
2.1 Added no addenda to code years.
Changed O&MS to MMRN, two places.
Changed NSP to Xcel Energy's, seven places.
Page 12 of 12
NORTHERN STATES POWER INSERVICE INSPECTION
SUMMARY
REPORT PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 199r
'2.
APPENDIX D LIST OF SECTION XI VT-2 EXAMINATIONS 1 Page 0
ISI RESULTS UNIT 2 3/30/97-1/1/99 A
z*c-l RC I
Reactor Coolant 2070 NF-39835 12129/1998 FW 2
Feedwater 2168.17 NF-39843 3/611998 VC 2
Chemical Vol Control-2168.16 NF-39836-7 10/1511997
.. 4¢
-Z
- ~~-~;
'~
NA*,~P
-qtfly74~7~<
t ~; t.
r~~t~t+4 4 Xj*-t.,
AILT--
B:iSI299.XLS 4,
2
-'-at
-kA
'-it'
4 0
0 Pagqe 1
NORTHERN STATES POWER INSERVICE INSPECTION
SUMMARY
REPORT PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2.2000 APPENDIX B LIST OF SECTION XI VT-2 EXAMINATIONS 1 Page vi
ISI RESULTS UNIT 2 1/1199 -617/00
,P~ 2 a/Z Reactor Coolant 2070 NF-39835 6/5/2000 H:ISI200.XLS RC 1
CC 2
Component Cooling 2168.4A NF-39844-1 4129/2000 RH 2
Residual Heat Removal 2168.10 NF-39840 612/2000 MS 2
Main Steam 2168.11 NF-39842 6/5/2000 SI 2
Safety Injection 2168.12 NF-39838 5/2912000 CS 2
Containment Spray 2168.14 NF-39824 5/29/2000 HC 2
Post LOCA 2168.15 NF-39830 5/31/2000 SS 2
Sampling System 2168.19 NF-39825 5/28/2000 RV 2
Vessel Vent System 2168.23 NF-39835 6/5/2000 2
Containment Vent (Misc) 2168.24 NF-39847 613/2000 SI/RH/CS 2
RWST to RHR Pit Trench 2168.25 NF-39839 5/28/2000 The above tests were performed on Unit Two Code Class 1 and 2 systems between the dates of 111/99 and 617100.
Page 1