ML021610508
| ML021610508 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/2002 |
| From: | Nazar M Nuclear Management Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML021610508 (64) | |
Text
Committed to NuclearExcelej§,ý'
May 31, 2002 10 CFR Part 50 Section 50.55a U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket No. 50-306 License No.
DPR-60 Request for Relief No. 12 for the Unit 2 3rd 10-year Interval Inservice Inspection Program On November 15, 1994 we submitted for review our third 10-year Inservice Inspection Examination Plan for Unit 2 and, on April 19, 1995, relief request revisions associated with that plan. The NRC issued its evaluation of the 3rd 10-year Interval Program Plan on February 22, 1996.
The purpose of this letter is to submit a relief request for "limited examinations" associated with that plan. Attached is Unit 2 Relief Request No. 12, Revision 0 which addresses those limited examinations. We are requesting relief pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50, Section 50.55a(g)(5)(iii) due to the impracticality of obtaining "100%" examination coverage for the affected items.
In this letter we have made no new Nuclear Regulatory Commission commitments.
Please contact Jack Leveille (651-388-1121, Ext. 4142) if you have any questions related to this letter.
Mano K. Nazar Site Vice Presi Prairie Island I
it Generating Plant c: (next page) 4Au"c-+J Mano K. Nazar Site Vice President Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC 1717 Wakonade Dr. East o Welch MN 55089
USNRC NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC May 31, 2002 Page 2 c: Regional Administrator-Region Il1, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, NRC NRR Project Manager, NRC Chief Boiler Inspector, State of MN P. Fisher, Hartford Insurance
Enclosure:
ISI Relief Request No. 12 (Rev. 0), Prairie Island Unit 2, 3rd Interval, with attached examination reports U2 Limited Exams.DOC
Nuclear Management Company INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN ISI Relief Request No. 12 (Rev. 0)
Limited Examination SYSTEM: Various Class: 1 and 2 Category: Various Item: Various Impractical Examination Requirements:
ASME Section XI (1989 no addenda) Code requires full examination of inservice inspection (ISI) components per Table IWB-2500-1, and IWC-2500-1. Reg. Guide 1.147 endorses Code Case N-460, "Alternative Examination Coverage for Class 1 and Class 2 Welds." This code case allows greater than 90% coverage of a weld to meet the "essentially 100%" requirement.
NRC Information Notice 98-42 "Implementation of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) Inservice Inspection requirements" Dec. 1, 1998, states "The NRC has adopted and further refined the definition of.""essentially 100 percent."" to mean greater than 90 percent " in 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(2) for required examination coverage of reactor pressure vessel welds. This standard has been applied to all examination of welds or other areas required by ASME Section XI.
The Prairie Island construction permit was issued in 1967. This facility was designed and constructed with limited accessibility due to component configurations and/or physical barriers for which 100% coverage is not achievable on some ISI components examined for the Third Ten Year Interval.
Basis for Relief:
The following 10 CFR 50.55a paragraphs apply to the inservice inspection of components in accordance with the ASME Section Xl code:
50.55a(g)(1): For a boiling or pressurized water-cooled nuclear power facility whose construction permit was issued prior to January 1, 1971, components (including supports) must meet the requirements of paragraphs (g) (4) and (5) of this section to the extent practical.
50.55a(g)(4): Throughout the service life of a boiling or pressurized water-cooled nuclear power facility, components (including supports) which are classified as ASME Code Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3 must meet the requirements, except design and access provisions and pre-service examination requirements, set forth in Section Xl of editions of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code... to the extent practical within the limitations of design, geometry and materials of construction of the components.
50.55a(g)(5)(iv): Where an examination requirement by the code or addenda is determined to be impractical by the licensee and is not included in the revised inservice inspection program as permitted by paragraph (g)(4) of this section, the basis for this determination must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Commission...
Page 1 of 9
Nuclear Management Company INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN Prairie Island was designed and constructed prior to development of ASME XI, therefore design for accessibility and inspection coverage is not, in many cases, sufficient to permit satisfying the current Code requirements. Limitations to inspections are primarily due to obstructions, interference and design configurations.
Summary of the limited examinations are described below and also included in the Table, which follows.
Part A: Category B-J, "Pressure Retaining Welds in Piping" Summary No. 501125, W-1, Reactor Coolant Pump to Pipe Weld, is limited to volumetric (UT) examination to 49.2% coverage. The limited examination coverage is the result of interference from a 6" branch connection at 270 degrees, 3" from toe of weld.
Summary No. 501140, W-1, Reactor Coolant Nozzle to Elbow Weld, is limited to volumetric (UT) examination to 55.35% coverage. The limited examination coverage is the result of the design configuration of the nozzle to elbow weld, which prohibits one of the four directional scans required.
Summary No. 501638, W-7, Reactor Coolant Valve to 45 degree Elbow Weld, is limited to volumetric (UT) examination one sided examination 50.00% coverage. PDI UT procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access examinations. The technique provided by the PDI procedure was used for a best effort examination for flaws on the far side of the weld. Valve to elbow configuration limits this examination to single side.
Summary No. 501804, W-9, Reactor Coolant Elbow to pipe weld, is limited to volumetric (UT) examination to 58.75% coverage. The limited examination coverage is the result of interference from an install box restraint close to the weld toe that prevents four directional scanning of complete weld.
Page 2 of 9
Nuclear Management Company INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN Part B: Category C-C "Integral attachments for Vessels, Piping, Pumps and Valves" Summary No. 500978, Main Steam Hanger H-2, Integral attached welds, is limited to surface examination of only 74.3% of surface area due to restraint configuration.
Summary No. 500985, Main Steam Hanger H-3, Integral attached welds, is limited to surface examination of only 74.3% of surface area due to restraint configuration.
Summary No. 500988, Main Steam Hanger H-3, Integral attached welds, is limited to surface examination of only 74.3% of surface area due to restraint configuration.
Part C: Category C-F-1 "Pressure Retaining Welds in Austenitic Stainless Piping" Summary No. 500251, W-17, Safety Injection Pipe to Valve weld, is limited to volumetric examination coverage of 50.00%. PDI UT procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access examinations. The technique provided by the PDI procedure was used for a best effort examination for flaws on the far side of the weld. Pipe to Valve configuration limits this examination to single side.
Summary No. 502388, W-1, Safety Injection Valve to Pipe weld is limited to volumetric examination coverage of 50.00%. PDI UT procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access examinations. The technique provided by the PDI procedure was used for a best effort examination for flaws on the far side of the weld. Valve to Pipe configuration limits this examination to single side.
Summary No. 502147, W-18/LSU, Residual Heat Removal Pipe to Flange weld is limited to volumetric examination coverage of 75.00%. PDI UT procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access examinations. The technique provided by the PDI procedure was used for a best effort examination for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Pipe to Flange configuration limits this examination to single side.
Summary No. 502372, W-1/LSD, Residual Heat Removal Valve to Reducer weld is limited to volumetric examination coverage of 50.00%. PDI UT procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access examinations. The technique provided by the PD1 procedure Page 3 of 9
Nuclear Management Company INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN was used for a best effort examination for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Valve to reducer configuration limits this examination to single side.
Summary No. 502392, W-5/LSD, Residual Heat Removal Valve to Reducer weld is limited to volumetric examination coverage of 50.00%. PDI UT procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access examinations. The technique provided by the PD1 procedure was used for a best effort examination for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Valve to reducer configuration limits this examination to single side.
Part D: Category C-F-2 " Pressure Retaining Welds in Ferritic and low alloy Piping."
Summary No. 500830, W-14/LSU, Main Steam Pipe-Flanged Nozzle weld is limited to surface examination coverage of 83.3%. Interference from a Hanger installed top dead center of weld prohibits adequate surface examination coverage.
Additional Means of Establishing Integqrity:
In addition, system pressure tests and associated visual inspections (VT-2) required by Section XI are performed at required frequency to ensure the piping system is capable of maintaining pressure integrity. System integrity is monitored during normal operation by many direct and indirect methods, e.g., containment radiation monitoring, containment air monitoring, containment sump monitoring, containment temperature monitoring, system walk downs, surveillance testing, etc.
For all listed B-J Category weld with UT volumetric limitations the associated required surface examination (PT or MT) was performed in accordance with Section XI.
For all listed C-C Category integral attached welds with surface examination limitations the associated required visual examination (VT-3) has been performed.
For all listed C-F-1 Category, austenitic piping welds with UT volumetric limitations the associated required surface (PT) examination was performed in accordance with Section XI.
All in-service inspection at Prairie Island Unit 2 have been done to the greatest extent practical. When limitation to required inspections are encountered procedure ISI-LTS-1 is applied which requires approved alternative examination techniques be considered, or applied to gain the maximum obtainable inspection coverage practical. In all of the Page 4 of 9
Nuclear Management Company INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN above items identified, this procedure was used and the maximum inspection coverage has been achieved for the components listed to ensure pressure and structural integrity.
Alternate Examination:
The limitations have been noted on the ISI examination reports and are included in the 1S1 Outage Summary Report. NMC will continue to document the limitations. No additional alternative examinations are proposed.
Limitations are due to configuration design, geometry, and materials of construction of the components or limitations of approved Performance Demonstration Initiated (PDI) examination procedures for the detection of flaws. NMC will continue to utilize the most current approved PDI techniques available for future examinations.
Page 5 of 9
Nuclear Management Company PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN Table: Limited Examinations-Prairie Island Unit 2 -2002 Refueling Outage.
Category Item No.
SYSTEM
[so
[Component IDescription Method
%Coverage REPORT Limitation I II d.
J I
I I
B-J B9.11 Reactor Coolant 2-ISl-32C W-1 Pump to Volumetric 49.2%
2002U035 Examination Limited due to Pipe UT 6" branch connection at 501125 270 degrees, 3" downstream from weld toe.
See attached report 2002U035 B-J B9.11 Reactor coolant 2-ISl-33B W-1 Nozzle to Volumetric 55.3%
2002U045 Examination limited due to Elbow UT the nozzle configuration at 501140 weld toe. See attached report 2002U045.
B-J B9.11 Reactor Coolant 2-ISI-28 W-7 Valve to 45 Volumetric 50.00%
2002U038 Single Sided examination Elbow UT PDI examination limitation.
501638 PDI procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams.
See attached report 2002U038 B-J B9.1 1 Reactor Coolant 2-ISI-20A W-9 Elbow to Volumetric 58.75%
2002U033 Examination limited due to Pipe UT box restraint prohibiting 501804 access to weld. See attached report 2002U033 C-C F-A,B,C Main Steam 2-1Sl-47A H-1 Rupture Surface 74.30%
2002M025 Weld area inaccessible due Restraint MT to restraint configuration.
500978 See report 2002M025 C-C F-A,B,C Main Steam 2-ISI-47A H-2 Seismic Surface 74.30%
2002M024 Weld area inaccessible due Restraint MT to restraint configuration.
500985 See report 2002M024 C-C F-A,B,C Main Steam 2-ISl-47A H-3 Seismic Surface 74.30%
2002M021 Weld area inaccessible due Restraint MT to restraint configuration.
500988 See attached report 2002M021 Page 6 of 9
Nuclear Management Company PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN C-F-1 C5.11 Safety Injection 2-ISI-72 W-17 Pipe to Valve Volumetric 50.00%
2002U036 Single Sided examination UT PDI examination limitation.
500251 PDI procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams.
See attached report 2002U036 C-F-1 C5.11 Safety Injection 2-1SI-70 W-1 Valve to Pipe Volumetric 50.00%
2002U037 Single Sided examination UT PDI examination limitation.
502388 PDI procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams.
See attached report 2002U037 C-F-1 C5.10 Residual Heat 2-ISI-51 W-18/LSU Pipe to Volumetric 75.00%
2002U001 Axial examination Removal Flange UT performed from pipe side 502147 only, due to Pipe to Flange Configuration. PDI procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams. See attached report 2002U001 C-F-1 C5.10 Residual Heat 2-1S-50 W-1/LSD Valve to Volumetric 50.00%
2002U028 Single Sided examination Removal Reducer UT P0D examination limitation.
502372 PDI procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams.
See attached report 2002U028 Page 7 of 9
Nuclear Management Company PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION EXAMINATION PLAN Page 8 of 9 C-F-1 C5.10 Residual Heat 2-1S-50 W-5/LSD Valve to Volumetric 50.00%
2002U026 Single Sided examination Removal Reducer UT PDI examination limitation.
502392 PDI procedure is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams.
See attached report 2002U026 C-F-2 C5.80 Main Steam 2-ISI-46B W-14/LSU Pipe Flanged Surface 83.00%
2002M016 Surface examination is Nozzle MT limited due to hanger 500830 interference at top dead center. See attached report 2002M016
Nuclear Management Company INSERVICE INSPECTION PRAIRIE ISLAND UNIT 2, 3RD INTERVAL EXAMINATION PLAN Attached reports in the following order (same as the order in the Table):
- 5. Magnetic Particle Examination 2002M025 6 pages
- 6. Magnetic Particle Examination 2002M024 6 pages
- 7. Magnetic Particle Examination 2002M021 6 pages
- 13. Magnetic Particle Examination 2002M016 4 pages Page 9 of 9
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No,:
501125 Workscope:
IS[
Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
B-J Location:
RCP Pump 21 Drawing No.:
2-1Sl-32C
==
Description:==
Pump To Pipe System ID:
RC Component ID: W-I Size/Length:
1.8" 197.3" Thickness/Diameter:
2.570"/31.0" Limitations:
See comments.
Start Time:
1200 Finish Time:
1359
,,,,,,4 ISI-UT-1 I 5
/I Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No,:
200211035 Examination Surface:
Inside Outside [
Surface Condition: FlatTop ed Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 00143 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Teatep Serial No.:
NSP 179 Surface Temp.:
83
°F Cal, Sheet No.:
2002CA0682 2002CA069, 2002CA070 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 Scanning dB 47.0 87.0 83.5 N/A Indication(s):
Yes D No *.'
Scan Coverage:
Upstream D Downstream 99 CWRe CCW W
Comments:
6" Branch connection at 270 deorees, 3" downstream from weld toe, Results:
NAD []
IND []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
GEO [
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
NMC 1
P12 Summary No.:
501125 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/.,FC:
Work Order No.:
iS!-UT-1 I 0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U035 Page:
2 of 4
Description of Limitation:
6" Branch connection at 270 degrees, 3" downstream from weld toe.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:\\IDDEAL5'0PI2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT,2002uO35_l.bmp RC-P P 2-1 Limitations removal requirements:
NIA Radiation field:
NIA Examiner Level i 1 Signature Date }Reviewer ature Date' Knott, Brian
- j
-"Wf 212/2002 Clay, Sean P.
/
Examiner Level 11 Signatue Date Site Review S
ig\\atur e Date Thomas, Travis er 2Lee2002 Wren, Jerry P.
Z
-3 Iatue
?-
Other Level NI/A Signature Date JANII Review 2'atr Data
[N/A I
Clow, Ron
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002U035 Page:
3 of 4
Summa*, No.* 501125 Examiner: Knott, Brian Examiner. Thomas, Travis Other:
NIA Level:
11 Reviewer Clay, Sean P.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
NIA ANII Review: Clow, Ron Date:..- '"-:2 Date: 2--o -O Date:
& le Comments: None Sketch or Photo:
G:AIDDEAL50\\P12RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u035_2.bmp
- RERM, TO
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501125 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure RevisioniFC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-6UT-4I 0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U035 Page:
4 of 4
0.000
% Length X 0.000 100.000
% Length X 96.800 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000
"% volume of length I 100 =
"% volume of length /100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length 1100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 1 96.800
% total for Scan 2 50.000
% total for Scan 3 50.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
49.200
% total for 45 dog Other deg-0 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan i Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length /100 =
0.000
% total for Scan I 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 2 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 3 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length 1100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 49.200
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
Date:
a-
?
-o "2 _
45 deg Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501140 Workscope:
ISl Procedure:
Procedure Revtsion/FC:
Work Order No,:
ISI-UT-11 5
/
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
B-J Location:
Containment Drawing No.:
2-SI-33B
==
Description:==
Nozzle To Elbow System ID:
RC Component ID: W-i Size/Length:
2.2" / 97.5" Thickness/Diameter: 2.890'" / 31.0" Limitations:
See Comments.
Start Time:
0927 Finish Time:
1251 Examination Surface:
Inside j]
Outside []
Surface Condition: Ground Flush Lo Location:
Outside Radius of Elbow Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 00143 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
PTC Instruments Serial No.:
3489 Surface Temp.:
87 0F Cal. Sheet No.:
2002CA085, 20(2CA0862 2002CA087 Angle Used 0 145 45T 60 Scanning dB
- 3.
750 72.0-N/A Indication(s):
Yes L]
No j
Scan Coverage:
Upstream 0 Downstream W/
CW [
CCW []
Comments:
No scan #1 due to nozzle configuration, Results:
NAD []
IND EZ GEO E]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level 11 Signat re Date Reviewer Signature Date Knott, Brian 2/19/2002 Clay, Sean P.
/-
(
Examiner Level Date Site Review Date Potter, Michael E.
/M 29/2002 Wren, Jerry P.
/ *i-*
tu-.e Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review tu--
/
Datr N/A
/Clew, Ron
/6Z-<
Outage No,:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U045 Pagqe:
I of 4
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501140 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
ISI-UT-11 Procedure RevisionrFC:
Work Order No.:
5
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U045 Page:
2 of 4
Description of Limitation:
No scan I performed due to nozzle configuration.
Sketch of Limitation:
NA -17LL G:\\fDDEAL50OP12RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT'2002u045_2.bmp
"\\\\v/////
/
t I~/
1
\\
W-i bEgA.
PLorT Limitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
NIA Examiner Level 11 Signature Date Reviewer signature Dated Kntt Biai=~
2/1912002 Clay, Sean P.
/ ýX
-0Z2'?92 Examiner Level
,/!*
,Sn.t l
Potter, Michael E.
I IA.
5 Level N/A Signature
/
Date Site Review 211912002 Wren, Jerry P.
Q t/
i re Date
,._ý*-
g
-n.
Date ANII Review Clow, Ron
Li)V/
Other NIA
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501140 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-t 1 5
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U045 Page:
3 of 4
100.000
% Length X 0.000 100.000
% Length X 100.000 100,000
% Length X 60.700 100.000
% Length X 60.700
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length 1100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000 100.000 60.700 60.700
"% total for Scan 1
"% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans 55.350
% total for 45 deg Other deo 0
(to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
0.000
% Length X 0.000 0.000
% Length X 0.000 0.000
% Length X 0.000 0.000
% Length X 0.000
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length 1100 =
"% volume of length /100 =
"% volume of length 1100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 1 0.000
% total for Scan 2 0.000
% total for Scan 3 0.000
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete covera-ge Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 55.350
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
A-x,-
Date:
45 dpa Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 Date:
Z.- 2,1-0 2_-.
Site Field Supervisor:
NO
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002U045 Page:
4 of 4
Summary No.: 501140 Examiner: Knott, Brian Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other NIA Level:
II Reviewer: Clay, Sean P.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
NIA ANII Review: Clow, Ron Date:
Date: 2-2I-- ?
Date:,/2/4-2.
Comments: None Sketch or Photo:
G:\\IDDEAL50\\PI2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u045_4.bmp To T-44E~ N 7.Z-L L.
"COPCot-mUMM4 AT TH F WELD TOE, woiý)
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501638 Workscope:
ISt Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
B-J Location:
Containment Drawing No.:
2-1SI-28
==
Description:==
Valve to 45 Elbow System ID:
RC Component ID: W-7 Size/Length:
.90" 121.0" Thickness/Diameter:
.74" / 8.0" Limitations:
Single side access due to configuration. See attached sheets.
Start Time:
0835 Finish Time:
0900 Examination Surface:
Inside F71 Outside k Surface Condition: Flat Topped Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 00143 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Teiate Serial No.:
NSP 185 Surface Temp.:
80
-F Cal. Sheet No.:
2002CA071, 2002CA072 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 Scanning dB N/A 41.8 41.8 66.8 Indication(s):
Yes []
No Wj Scan Coverage:
Upstream D Downstream []
See Limitation Sheet.
Results:
NAD [
IND El GEO Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
-M-Vc*5 7,4%t-07, Examiner Level i, Sgr~
Date nReviewer aure
) ate Trim,Jeremy T.
I2/14/2002 Clay, Sean P./
AY§"'N
/,j7Z Examiner Level S.gnaturge-Date Site Review Signatur" Date Oher D evid M
N/A Signature2/14/2002 Wren, Jerry P.
f2gn 1.
ture 2.te I
Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review n ture Date NIA
/Clew, Ron/
ISI-UT-1GA 1
/
Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No,:
2002U038
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501638 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
ISI-UT-16A Procedure Revision/FC:
I Work Order No.:
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U038 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
Single sided exam - Although the exam was performed through 100% of the code required volume. Procedure ISf-UT-16A is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams. The techniques provided by this procedure were used for a best effort exam for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:\\IDDEAL5O\\PI2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u038 1.bmp FL 6 V/
v VALVE WELD W--7 vCAOM074 PRLor Limitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
N/A Examiner Level 11 Sgnat Date Reviewer Date Timm, Jeremy T.
2/1412002 Clay, Sean P.
/
7 Ld.>/7
-Q.
Examiner Level t!
/'7q-p'tue Date Site Review
-'---ignature Date Griebel, DavidM.
/
Z-211412002 Wren, Jerry P.
I(D.J
-Z~ 'I
-I rl.J f
AIN0 D t Clow, Ran
- /
A2_
- !,S....
- ýj
(*U
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501638 Workscope:
ISi Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-16A 0106946 Outage No,:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U038 Page:
3 of 3
100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000
"% volume of length /100 =
50.000
"% volume of length 1100 =
50.000
"% volume of length 1100 =
50.000
"% volume of length /100 =
50.000
% total for Scan I
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
50.000
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length 1100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / I00 =
0.000
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coveragqe Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 50.000
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
L ate:j JC-"
45 deg Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 Date:
2- - I I o_ý
- I, W-0M.
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Procedure:
ISI-UT-16A Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Summary No.:
501804 Procedure Revision/FC:
1
/
Report No.:
2002U033 Workscope:
ISI Work Order No.:
0106946 Page:
1 of 5
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
B-J Location:
22 Vault Drawing No.:
2-1SI-20A Descdption: Elbow to Pipe System ID:
RC Component ID: W-9 Size/Length:
.95" / 27" Thickness/Diameter:
.80" 1 8" Limitations:
See attached limitation sheet.
Start Time:
1340 Finish Time:
1415 Examination Surface:
Inside E Outside FvJ Surface Condition: Flat ToDped Lo Location:
Extradose of Elbow We Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
Sonotrace40 Batch No.:
- 00143 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Telatanmp Serial No,:
NSP 185 Surface Temp.:
90
'F Cat. Sheet No.:
2002CA06.5 2002CA066 Angle Used 0
455T so0 Scanning dB NIA 366 36.6 70.0 Indication(s):
Yes ]
No [j'*
Scan Coverage:
Upstream FY Downstream WI CW 0" CCW fv Comments:
Reference PT report #2002PO313 for pictures.
Results:
NAD 2 IND []
GEO []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Examiner Level II Date Reviewer Tlim, Jeremy T.
/
122002 Clay, Sean P.
Examiner Level II Signature Date Site Review Griebel, David M.
/2112/2002 Wren, Jerry P.
Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review N/AClw, Rn Yes Yes
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002U033 Page:
2 of 5
Summary No.: 501804 Examiner: Timm, Jeremy T.
Examiner: Griebel, David M.
Other:
NIA Level:
II Reviewer: Clay, Sean P.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
N!A ANI Review: Clow, Ron Date:.
-I 7-oa.
Date:
- l*-o Date: _______
Comments:
None Sketch or Photo:
G:\\IDDEAL5O0PI2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u033_2.bmp
/L,l ELJ?4c3 WELO W-W R/_o 7---W5 O#
W_
" -Aý
-7wZ coV#,*l Frou/*#o#Z"w*r
/*
12401C 67t->
Summary No.: 501804 Examiner: Timm, Jeremy T.
Examiner: Griebel, David M.
Other: NIA Supplemental Report Report No.:
Page:
Level:
It Reviewer: Clay, Sean P.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
N/A ANII Reviewv Clow, Ron 2002U033 3
of 5
Date:
- 7C-OZ-.
Date:
f_-0_
Date: _______z Comments: None Sketch or Photo: G:\\IDDEAL50\\PI2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT-2OO2uO33_3.bmp M 2.*Y nWIZTOWA,2 WELD
\\4-.
- Vr*
PLL5[
z~72//
o*w A
5,0~
d 6~
-5440 i
/, z i/Z.' O~,/,
/3:,"O
- w i.,siv /
f l I
I
-ýMgzmv
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501804 Workscope:
IS1 Procedure:
ISI-UT-16A Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
0106946 Outage No.;
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U033 Page:
4 of 5
Description of Limitation:
Reference PT report #2002P038 for pictures.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:\\1DDDEAL50YPI2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u033_ 1.bmp J"
Limitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
N!A Examiner Level iH Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Timm JeremyT.
- 1. 4,
'2I2-002 ClaySeanI Examiner Level 3 i ture
,,/
Date Site Review Si nature Date Griebel, David M.
1
/--2/12/2002 Wren, Jerry P.
Other Level NI/A Sign N/A
/
ANII Review Clow, Ron 6 ~np(ure I
Liate I /
ature
(
Date
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
501804 Workscope:
IS1 Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-16A Outage No.:
P12RF2002 1
/
Report No.:
2002U033 0106946 Page:
5 of 5
45 deg Scan 1 89.000
% Length X 26.300
% volume of length / 100 =
23.407
% total for Scan I Scan 2 57.500
% Length X 26.300
% volume of length / 100 =
15.123
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000
% Length X 25.000
% volume of length /100 =
25.000
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 25.000
% volume of length /100 =
25.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans 22.132
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 89.000
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
89.000
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 57.500
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length 1100 =
57.500
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 58.757
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
Date:
Magnetic Particle Examination Site/Unit:
NMC I
P12 Summary No.:
500978 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-1 12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M025 Page:
1 of 6
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-C Location:
Containment Drawing No.:
2-ISI-47A
==
Description:==
Rupture Restaint System ID:
MS Component ID: H-1 Size/Length:
N/A Limitations:
See attached sheets.
Light Meter Mfg.:
N/A Serial No.:
NIA Illumination:
N/A uw/cm2 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
N/A Serial No.:
N/A Surface Temp.:
< 600
-F Resolution:
Not Used Cal Block Serial No.:
N/A Surface Condition:
As Welded Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Field Orientation:
Longitudinal Magnetic Particle Material Brand:
Magnaflux Wet E]
Mixed:
Yes Li Applied By:
Dusting V Type:
No. I Gray Dry []
No [
Spraying Di Batch No.:
84A047 Fluorescent Li With:
NIA Flooding EL Equipment:
Parker Research Sedal No.:
7817 Head Shot L]
N/A Amperes Fixed Spacing Li AC W]
DC El Adj. Spacing W
2-6 inches Encircling Coils Li N/A Turns Prods. Spacings N/A inches Current (machine setting)
EL NIA Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
Reference exam Report No: 98-0273, 98-0274.
Results:
NAD W1 IND ELi_
A/0, Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
-yes-Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level II Signat re Date Reviewer Sig aluje Date Loredo, Quirino
/*--*
,.,,.*,* 2117/2002 Hailing, David A.
/ I t
j.JA*
Examiner Level II
-!i, uDate Site Review Sigpatur9 Date Potter, Michael E.
ittr 2
02eN, Rew P
&*Lure Dat Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review ueDate N/A
/Clow, Ron e,
N voý
Limitation Record SitelUnit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500978 Workscope:
IS!
Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-1 12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
PI2RF2002 Report No.:
2002M025 Page:
2 of 6
Description of Limitation:
East Side. See supplemental sheets for additional photos.
Sketch of Limitation:
G ;\\IDDEAL5O\\PI2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002mr0211.bmp Limitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
N/A Examiner Level I1 S
ature Date Reviewer Signat~e.
Date Loredo, Quirino
/
i/6",
2/17/2002 Hailing, David A.
Z 2
-o Examiner Level 11 iA Date Site Review SignaturT Date Potter, Michael E.
2/1712002 Wren, Jerry P.
/
L
.*,A/.-
& Z-k Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Dateure Date N/A
- IClow, Ron h
a2
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M025 Page:
3 of 6
Summary No.: 500978 Examiner: Loredo, Quirino Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NIA Level:
II Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
NIA ANII Review: Glow, Ron Date: 2Z ( -0z Date:
Date: _/__/o_-
Comments: Top View (Looking Down).
Sketch or Photo:
G:\\IDDEAL5O\\I2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002m024_2.brnp
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M025 Page:
4 of 6
Summary No.: 500978 Examiner: Loredo, Quirino Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NIA Level:
1i Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
Ii Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
NWA ANII Review-Clow, Ron Date: Z"- 2I -c5&
Date: 7-Z 1-4 -L Date:,*?/2z /oza Comments: Side View.
Sketch or Photo:
G:\\IDDEAL50\\Pl2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MTR2002m024_3.bmp NMD
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M025 Page:
5 of 6
Summary No.: 500978 Examiner: Loredo, Quirino Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NIA Level:
11 Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
I]
Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
N/A ANti Review: Clew, Ron Date: z.-2.-o2 Date:
-2,- 1.1 Date: -_/_2_1..
Comments: Inaccessible Weld.
Sketch or Photo:
G:\\IDDEAL50\\Pl2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002mO24_4.bmp Ni
Nil)T~~h Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site/Unit NMC
/
P12 Summary No.:
500978 Workscope:
IsI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-1 12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M025 Page:
6 of 6
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length
- Width Total Area required 908-square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 604.000 sq. in.j Total area required (1.00%)
4-
' sq. in.
= Percent coverage
.0496-
% (area required,- area of limitations area examined) 73%
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note -
Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000
- (Pi) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2,5 2,875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4.5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75,
33.77 Site Field Supervisor:
P C--Date:
>2("-'c--Z Date:
(%7
Magnetic Particle Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500985 Workscope:
IS1 Procedure:
ISI-MT-1 Procedure Rev/FC:
Work Order No.:
12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M024 Page:
1 of 6
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-C Location:
Containment Drawing No.:
2-1S-47A
==
Description:==
Seismic Restraint System ID:
MS Component ID: H-2 Size/Length:
N/A Limitations:
See attached sheet.
Light Meter Mfg.:
N/A Serial No.:
N/A Illumination:
N/A uw/cm 2 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
NIA Serial No.:
N/A Surface Temp.:
< 600
°F Resolution:
Not Used Cal Block Serial No.:
N/A Surface Condition:
As Welded Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Field Orientation:
Longitudinal Magnetic Particle Material Brand:
Magnaflux Wet 77 Mixed:
Yes 77 Applied By:
Dusting SW Type:
No. I Gray Dry No VI Spraying D Batch No.:
84A047 Fluorescent 77 With:
NIA Flooding 77 Equipment:
Parker Research Serial No.:
7817 Head Shot 7
N/A Amperes Fixed Spacing E-AC F6 DC 77 Adj. Spacing IV 2 -6 inches Encircling Coils 77 N/A Turns Prods. Spacing
'I N/A inches Current (machine setting)
E7 NIA Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Comments:
Reference exam Report No: 98-0273 and 98-0274.
Results:
NAD []
IND 7-1 Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level I1 Sig ture Date ReviewerSit Date
-Loredo, Quirino
/
2/912002 1alling. David A.
/,
Examiner Level II Potter, Michael E.
I Other Level N/A ai PSn Date Site Review l
r" 291/2002 Wren, Jerry P.
Signature Date ANIi Review Clow, Ron Signature Lv, trr Date Date N V110
Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500985 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISt-MT-1 12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M024 Page:
2 of 6
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length
-Q4966
- Width
.GW Total Area required O-OW square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 604.000 sq. in. / Total area required (100%)
4 sq. in.
= Percent coverage 9461
% (area required - area. of limitations area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note - Diameter refers to actual extemal diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000
- (Pi) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2,375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2,875 9,03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50.27 3.5 4.0 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
4.5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77 Site Field Supervisor:
Date:
Z_- 2-_ -
?____.
t}
- rip,
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500985 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
ISI-MT-1 Procedure Revision/FC:
12
/
Work Order No.:
0106948 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M024 Page:
3 of 6
Description of Limitation:
East Side, See supplemental sheets for additional photos.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:\\IDDEAL50OPI2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002m021_I.bmp Limitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
N/A Examiner Level 11 Signa re Date Reviewer Signare Date LordoQuiino2/912002 Hailing, David A.
I E _4, Date Site Review Signature Date Potter, Michael E.
002 Wren, Jerry P.
/
)Glk----
- 2.
o I Other Level N/A Signature Date ANIII Review ure Date NIA I
/
R
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M024 Page:
4 of 6
Summary No.: 500985 Examiner: Loredo, Quirino Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
N/A Level:
11 Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
11 Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
NIA AN!! Review: Clow, Ron Date:
.o' Date:
t-, Z Date: "
Z
,)
2/
Comments: Top View (Looking Down).
Sketch or Photo: G:klDDEAL50\\PI2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002m024_2.bmp
j4ji
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M024 Page:
5 of 6
Summary No.: 500985 Examiner: Loredo, Quirino Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NJA Level:
II Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
N/A ANII Review: Clow, Ron Date: z t -02 Date: J*-L2(-6 Date: AI,2.*,,f Comments:
Side View.
Sketch or Photo:
G:\\IDDEAL50\\PI2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTALMT'\\2002m024_3.bmp
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M024 Page:
6 of 6
Summary No.: 500985 Examiner: Loredo, Quirino Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NIA Level:
II Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
N/A ANII Review: Clow, Ron Date: 2.-2-o2z Date:
, 24-6 t
7 Date:
-/.
i */o-Comments: Inaccessible Weld.
Sketch or Photo:
G:\\IDDEAL50\\Pl2RFO2O02\\SUPPLEMENTAL M-i12002m024_4.bmp
Magnetic Particle Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500938 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
ISI-MT-I Procedure Rev'FC Work Order No.:
12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M021 Page:
1 of 6
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-C Location:
Containment Drawing No.:
==
Description:==
Seismic Restraint System ID:
MS Component ID: H-3 Size/Length:
N/A Limitatons:
See attached sheets.
Light Mete( Mfg.:
NIA Serial No.:
NWA Illumination:
NIA uw/cm 2 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
N/A Serial No.:
N/A Surface Temp.:
< 600
-F Resolution:
NIA Cal Block Serial No.:
N/A Surface Condition:
As Welded Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Field Orientation:
Longitudinal Magnetic Particle Material Brand:
Magnaflux Wet 0_
Mixed:
Yes El Applied By:
Dusting [
Type:
No. I Gray Dry V" No V1 Spraying []
Batch No.:
84A047 Fluorescent Ii With:
N/A Flooding El Equipment:
Parker Research Serial No.:
7817 Head Shot 10 NIA Amperes Fixed Spacing E[}
AC V]
DC []
Adj. Spacing 2 -6 inches Encircling Coils El NIA Turns Prods. Spacing E, N/A inches Current (machine setting)
El N/A Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remariks No.
L W
RIL Comments:
Reference exam Report No: 98-0273 and 98-0274.
Results:
NAD W IND 0_
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level I1 Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Thomas, Travis I
u 2/16/2002 Hailing, David A.
/ \\,
.f \\-z..,
2 l-C--0'?
Examiner Level 11 4t
)
Date Site Review Si,~tr ~
i~Dt Potter, Michael E.
/
211612002 Wren, Jerry P'"-
Cther Level NfA Signature Date ANii Review P.- at>S a
Date N/A
/Clow, Ron
Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500988 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
1SI4MT-1 12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M021 Page:
2 of 6
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length 0
Width 0,M
= Total Area required 0
square incnes
- Lt2 3o--*'-
Coverage Achieved Area examined 604.000 sq. in. / Total area required (100%)
.0OO.O sq. in.
= Percent coverage
.U
% (area required - area of limitations area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note - Diameter refers to actual external diameter not pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000
- (Pi) 3.1416
= Length 0.000 inches Pipe Actual (Length)
Pipe Actual (Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Circumference 2
2.375 7.46 12 12.75 40.06 2.5 2.875 9.03 14 14.0 43.98 3
3.5 11.0 16 16.0 50,27 3.5 4.0 12.57
- 18.
180 56.55 4
4.5 14.14 20 20.0 62.83 5
f 5.563 17.48 22 22.0 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 75.40 8
8.625 27.10 30 30.0 94.25 10 10.75 33.77
[1_
Site Fieid Supervisor:
/
(; (AJf\\
Date:
7ýý - Irx 1ý11411 Me'ý7ý
Limitation Record Site!Unit:
NMC P12 Summary No.:
500988 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
lSi-MT-1 Procedure RevisionlFC:
12 1
Work Order No.:
0106946 Outage No.:
Pl2RF2002 Report No.:
2002F,021 Page:
3 of 6
Description of Limitation:
East Side. See supplemental sheets for additional photos.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:klDDEAL50kýP:2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMErNTAL MT%202m0211.bmp Limitations removal requirements:
NIA Radiation field:
N/A Examiner Level 11 Sionature Date Reviewer ignatt{e Date Thomas, Travis
/
211612002 Hailing, David A.
V.0 0
Examiner Level ti Date Site Rviewe Potter, Michael E, 2/1612002 Wren, Jerry P.
/
Glow. Ron e
I. "Y 7
- I !A ign. Ure IClow, Ron uate
Supplemental Report Report No.:
Page:
Summary No.: 500988 Examiner: Thomas, Travis Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NIA Level:
Ii Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
It Site Review: Wren, Jerry P, Level:
NIA AN;[ Review: Clow, Ron 2002M021 4
of 6
Date:.
_0 -z Date: ;-ZI -
t Date: 94/z,/64 Comments: Top View (Looking Down).
Sketch or Photo: G:\\IDDEAL50\\P12RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002m024_2.bmp
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M021 Page:
- 5.
of 6
Summary No.: 500988 Examiner: Thomas, Travis Examniner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NIA Level:
11 Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Levei:
N/A ANII Review: Clow, Ron Date:
2
)-__
Date:- _
Comments: Side View.
Sketch or Photo: G:\\IDDEAL50,rPl2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002m024 3.bmp
Supplemental Report Report No.:
2002M021 Page:
6 of Summary No.: 500988 Examiner: Thomas, Travis Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Other:
NIA Level:
It Reviewer: Halling, David A.
Level:
II Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
Level:
N/A ANII Review: Clow, Ron Date:
4-
Ž Date: __
Date: ___
Comments: Inaccessible Weld.
Sketch or Photo:
G:\\fDOEAL50\\PI2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT,2002m024_4.bmp
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500251
-1nr,enr.
o Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
ISI-UT-1 GA I
/
Outage No.:
PI2RF2002 Report No.:
2002U036 Work Order No.:
0106946 Page:
I of 3
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-F-I Location:
Containment Drawing No.:
2-ISI-72
==
Description:==
Pipe to Valve System ID:
St Component ID: W-17 Size/Length:
1.0" I 21.0" Thickness/Diameter:
.740" 9 8.0" oR35 Limitations:
Single side access due to configuration. See attached sheets, Start Time:
-0992-Finish Time:
1000 Examination Surface:
Inside Outside
- Surface Condition: Flat Topped Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 00143 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Telatemgp Serial No-:
NSP 185 Surface Temp.:
80 "F
Cal. Sheet No.:
2002CA071, 2002CA072 Angle Used 0
ý45 60 Scanning dB N/A 41.8.8 Indication(s):
Yes [
No _
Scan Coverage:
Upstream 0%
Downstream El CW [V CCW PRI Comments:
See Limitation Sheet, Results:
NAD :
IND
]
GEO Ei Percent Of Coverage Obtained >90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
.,a"e
'2_1 q -6 Z Elxaminer Level II Signat.----
Date Reviewer
,Signature Date STimm, Jeremy -T-.
/
2/14/2002 Clay, Sean P.
",j..
c;"
Examiner Level II,7 Signatu
-Date Site Review Signatur¢ Date Griebel, David M.
~2114/20021 Wren, Jerry P.
/7
,v2-ic Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review gnature Date
/ /
Clow, Ron
/
2 2
ig/1ture Re.'
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
NWC
/
P12 Summary No.:
500251 Workscope:
IS[
Procedure:
tSI-U-16A Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
1
/06 0106946 Outage No.:
Report No.:
P12RF2002 2002U036 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
Single sided exam - Although the exam was performed through 100% of the code required volume. Procedure ISI-UT-16A is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams. The techniques provided by this procedure were used for a best effort exam for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:\\IDDEAL5OP12RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UV\\2002u036_I.bmp 2.o Mo/**sr*2P:
W-17 EY*Lr Ae
-ý9E VýýiAt6 A
'iS Vt/ V 4,V 0 60z Limitations removal requirements:
NfA Radiation field:
NIA Examiner Level it ignatu#%
Date Reviewer S
,ignature Datef TirnmmJeremyT.
/
/1
- 211412002 Clay, Sean P.
11
?
Examiner Level ii11nre Date Si',te Review Sig tu, q Datle Griebel, David M.
I 2!1412002 Wren, Jarry P.
t-$-
.AJA-2, IL Grie.o,,
Dav.-d M.
rf-Level NIA Other NIA Sig nature Date ANII Review Clow, Ron I /..- Sin'ature Date t
I
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500251 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision!FC:
Work Order No.:
ISJ-UT-16A 1
06946 0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U036 Page:
3 of 3
100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% total for Scan 1 50.000
% total for Scan 2 50.000
% total for Scan 3 50.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
50.000
% total for 45 deg Other deq -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
% Length X 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
"% total for Scan 1
"% total for Scan 2
"% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage, Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 50.000
% Total for complete exam Sie ildSpevso:Dae
- 2. tO 45Sder Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Date:
Site Field Supervisor:
UIT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
NMC 1
P12 Procedure:
ISI-UT-16A Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Summary No,:
502388 Procedure Revision/FC:'
I
/
Report No.:
2002U037 Workscope:
IS!
Work Order No.:
0106946 Page:
1 of 3
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-F-I Location:
Containment Drawing No,:
2-ISI-70
==
Description:==
Valve to Pipe Syslern ID:
SI Component ID: W-1 Size/Length:
1.0" 21.0" Thickness/Diameter:
.740" / 8.0" Limitations:
Single side access due to configuration. See attached sheets.
Start Time:
0800 Finish Time:
0830 Examination Surface:
Inside [-
Outside [J Surface Condition: Flat Topped Lo Location:
Top Dead C enter Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 00143 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Telatp Serial No.:
NSP 185 Surface Temp.:
80
-F Cal. Sheet No.:
2002CA071, 2002CA072 AngleUsed 0
'5 4T 60 Scanning dB IN/AI
.8 41.8 66.8 Indication(s):
Yes Li No g.*
Scan Coverage:
Upstream []
Downstream W]
Comments:
See Limitation Sheet.
Results:
NAD &1 IND []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > !0%:
Examiner Level II Timm, Jeremy T.
/
Examiner Level 1i Griebel, David M.
/
Other Level NIA N/A f
GEO [_,
No Reviewed Previous Data:
.I
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
NMO
/
P12 Summary No.:
502388 Workscope:
iSI Procedure:
ISI-UT-1 6A Procedure Revision!FC:
Work Order No.:
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U037 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
Single sided exam -Although the exam was performed through 100% of the code required volume. Procedure [SI-UT-16A is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams. The techniques provided by this procedure were used for a best effort exam for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:\\IDDEAL5O\\P12RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u037_1.bmp FLOw VA LV E COMOAe,'TX~
Uj-I 9*&'A,~iPg~M us,,.6 A_ q~t 4V 60"_M4&V Limitations removal requirements:
NfA Radiation field:
N/A Examiner Level II ignat Date Reviewer Signature Timm, Jeremy T.
/ /
2114/2002 Clay, Sean P.
/
L s¢ -
Examiner Level 11,g<eDate Site Review Si nature Date Griebel, David M.
I
.1Y.,,Wrn.Jrr P
Iir]veNIA Signature Date ANI1 Review
/
S..ureoate RdainA field:
NIAVd
_Clow, Ron PIPE N'A
/
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
NMC I
P12 Summary No.:
502388 Workscope:
1St Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
!SI-UT-1 SA 1
/6946 0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U037 Page:
3 of 3
100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% total for Scan 1 50.000
% total for Scan 2 50.000
% total for Scan 3 50.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
50.000
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 1 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length I 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 2 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length I 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 3 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 4 Percent comD!ete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 50.000
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
LAJ Date: 2 -1i-Z_
45 deg Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
502147 Procedure:
ISI-UT-16A Procedure Revision/FC:
1
/
Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002UG01 Workscope:
ISI Work Order No.:
0106946 Page: "1 of 3
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-F-1 Location:
B RHR Pit Drawing No.:
2-ISI-51
==
Description:==
Pipe to Flange System ID:
RH Component ID: W-18tLSU Size/Length:
12" Thickness/Diameter:
.375" Limitations:
Pipe to flange. No scans downstream of weld - 18.
Start Time:
1200 Finish Time:
1220 Examination Surface:
Inside [
Outside [
Surface Condition: As Welded Lo Location:
Top Dead Center "Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Telatemp We Location:
Centerline of Weld Serial No.:
NSP 162 Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Surface Temp.:
80
°F Batch No.:
- 00143 Cal. Sheet No.:
Angle Used Scanning dB 2002CA002, 2002CA003 0..
.45T 160 70 4755.0 Indication(s):
Yes El No F/]
Comments:
Scan Coverage:
Upstream IV]
Downstream []
CW [
CCWM[V Single sided exam - Although the examination was performed through 100% of the code required volume. Procedure ISI-UT-16A is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams. The techniques provided by this procedure were used for a BEST EFFORT EXAMINATION for flaws on the far side of the weld. 75% total coverage achieved Results:
NAD W IND E]
GEO E]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
[ETxaminer Level II Signature Date Reviewer
\\it)nature DateI Johnson,JeroyM
/
Jf M.
30/2002 Clay, sean P
/
2..-
L).
,Examiner Level i
A Date Site Review
,ignnat re' Date Gria--l, D 1/30/2002 Wren, Jerry P.
Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review ur.
Date N/A R
Clew, Non
,,.__' /"
7 N
N/A
Site/Unit:
/
Pi2 Summary No.:
502147 "Workscope:
ISl Limitation Record Procedure:
Procedure RevisiornFC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-I 6A 0106945 Outage No.:
P112RF2002 Report No.:
2002U001 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
Axial examination performed from the pipe side only due to Pipe to Flange configuration.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:'IDDEAL50\\PI2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u001_I.bmp FIPE
&I6Z4e-P W -/'R //. *1Z1 Limitations removal requirements:
None Radiation field:
Examiner Level li Si nature Date 'Reviewer Si n ture.
Date Johnson, Jeffrey M.
/
113012002 Clay, Sean P.
Grisbel, David Mi.
/
t/3012002 Wren, Jerry P.
,,qr D.. e Other Leve! NIA Signature Date ANIi Review ot.'e Date
/I
[Cot. Ron
/
N)
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summay No.:
502147 Workscope:
iSf Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Ordet No.:
ISI-UT-16A 0
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U001 Page:
3 of 3
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length /100 =
0.000
% volume of length /100 =
100.000
% volume of length /100 =
100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000 0.000 100.000 100.000
% total for Scan 1
"% total for Scan 2
"% total for Scan 3
"% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
50.000
% total for 45 deg Other deea 70 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X 50.000 50.000
"% volume of length/100 =
"% volume of length 1 100 =
"% volume of length I 100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% total for Scan i 50.000
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 75.000
% Total for complete exam C*'* t f L.*
45 deg Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 Site Field Supervisor: Jerry Wren i
Date: ý5
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
NMC f
P12 Procedure:
ISl Summary No.:
502372 Procedure Revision/FC:
I Workscope:
ISI Work Order No.:
01 Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-F11 Loc Drawing No.:
2-1SI-50
==
Description:==
Valve to Reducer System ID:
RH Component ID: W-IILSD Size/Len Limitations:
Single sided exam.
UT-16A 06946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U028 Page:
I of 3
Page:
1 of 3
ation:
Containment gth:
1.0" 127.0" Start "rime:
130(
Start Time:
130CI Finish Time:
1345 Thickness/Diameter:
.8" 11 0,0" l
Finish Time:
1345 Examination Surface:
Inside E]
Outside Me La Location:
j Tp P ead Center Wo Location:
Temp. lool Mfg.:
Telatemp Serial No.:
Cal. Sheet No.:
2002CA053, Angle Used 0
445 45T 60 Scanning dB N/A 43.4 43.4 69.2 Indication(s):
Yes L]
No S6 Comments:
No scan 2 duo to valve configuration.
Surface Condition:
Centerline of Weld NSP 185 2002CA054 E
Scan Coverage:
Upstrean"n EL Downstream S1 CWW CCW V Results:
NAD k IND []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > !)0%:
GEO EL No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
- 00143 Surface Temp.:
95
-F Containment m___
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
502372 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
ISI-UT-1 6A Procedure Revision/FC:
I I
Work Order No.:
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U028 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
Single sided exam - Although the examination was performed through 100% of the code required volume. Procedure ISI-UT 1 6A is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams. The techniques provided by this procedure were used for a best effort exam for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:',IDDEAL50\\PI2RFO2002ýSUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u028_1.bmp
/cZv/'
WL VALV E WELD vi-!
cLJvgdqAEj /2t5/
Limitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
N/A reve
,Dt eviewer Datei n
Ex mnr Lee I
1 ign n
DaeateSg atr b M.
214i2o02 IClay, Sean P.
/
Examiner Level 1!
Timm, Jeremy T.
Date I
~
2/1412002 Level NIJA z Signature Other NIA Site Review Wren, Jerry P.
Date 1ANiI Review rCuov, Ron
.~-.-.. -Signature, Date pature Date
-4
,% L A -TL I
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
N M-C
/
P12 Summary No.:
502372 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-UT-16A I
/1--
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U028 Page:
3 of 3
"% Length X
"% Length X
"% Length X
"% Length X 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
"% volume of length /100 =
"% volume of length / 100 =
50.000 50.000 50,000 50.000
"% total for Scan 1
"% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
50.000
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length/ 100 =
0.000
"% total for Scan 1
"% total for Scan 2
"% total for Scan 3
"% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 50.000
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
0~ Gdr"-
Date:
0
/
C->,
45 deg Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
UT Pipe Weld Examination Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
502392 Workscope:
ISl Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No,:
ISI-UT-I 6A 1
/
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-F-I Location:
Containment Drawing No.:
2-ISI-50
==
Description:==
Valve to Reducer System ID:
RH Component ID: W-5ILSD Size/Length:
1.0" 1 27.0" Thickness/Diameter:
.8" /1,0" Limitations:
See Comments.
Start Time:
1350 Finish Time:
1430 Examination Surface:
Inside E]
Outside [
Surface Condition: Ground Lo Location:
Top Dead Center We Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
Sonotrace 40 Batch No.:
_100143 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Telaternp Serial No.:
NSP 185 Surface Temp.:
90
-F Cal. Sheet No.:
2002CA049, 002CA050 Angle Used 0
45 0
Scanning d8B N/A
- 4.
43.4 NIAj Indication(s):
Yes E No _
Scan Coverage:
Upstream [_
Downstream [!
Comments:
See Limitation Record, Results:
NAD IJ ND L]
GEO [j Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes F[Exarniner Level II j
Sture Date Reviewer 3atignaturee Griebel, David M.
/
2/13/2002 Clay, Sean P.
Examiner Level 11 S.-n S
r Date Site Review Aignatuy Date "irimrn, Jeremy T.
I X
2/1312002 Wren, Jerry P.
Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review nature Date NIA
/
Clw, Ron
-7/
7-
// ýi e
Outage No.:
PI2RF2002 Report No.:
2002U026
Limitation Record Site/Unit:
NNC t
P12 Summary No.:
502392 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
ISI-UT-1 6A Procedure Revision!FC:
Work Order No.:
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U026 Page:
2 of 3
Description of Limitation:
Single sided exam - Although the examination was performed through 100% of the code required volume. Procedure ISI-UT I 6A is not qualified for the detection of flaws on the far side of single side access exams. The techniques provided by this procedure were used for a best effort examination for flaws on the far side of the weld.
Sketch of Limitation:
Gf:\\lDDEAL50\\PlI2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENTAL UT\\2002u026_I.bmp
. FLoV/
\\ALvE WELL)
W--6
.40V25--1E PZ61V Limitations removal requirements:
NIA Radiation field:
N/A Examiner Level 11ntuDt Reviewuer Signature Date Griebel, David M.
/
a"
/
211312002 Clay, Sean P Exami~ner Level i
Z ignat,*/f Date Site Review Date Timm, Jeremy T.
/
/2132002 Wren, Jerry Other NIA Level NkA
/ tSignature Dato IANII Review I Clow, Ron UaTe C-PELZL&ý ER'
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
502392 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
iSi4UT-1I6A 0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002U026 Page:
3 of 3
100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000
"% Length X
"% Length X
"% Length X
"% Length X 50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% volume of length /100 =
50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000
"% total for Scan I
"% total for Scan 2
"% total for Scan 3
"% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
50.000
% total for 45 deg Other deq-60 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 1 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length /1 00 =
0.000
% total for Scan 2 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 3 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 50.000
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
- Date, 45 deg Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
-A
Magnetic Particle Examination SitePJnit:
Summary No.:
/
P12 500830 VWorkscope:
SI5 Procedure:
Procedure Rev/FC:
Work Order No..
ISI-.MT-.1 12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M016 Page:
1 of 4
Code:
1989 Code Cat.:
C-F-2 Location:
Aux. Bldg.
Drawing No.:
2-SI-46B
==
Description:==
Pipe-Flanged Nozzle System ID:
MS Component ID: W-14/LSU Size/Length:
16" 1 72" Limitations:
Hanger at Top Dead Center.
Light Meter Mfg.:
N/A Serial No.:
N/A Illumination:
N/A uw/cm2 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
NWA Serial No.:
N/A Surface Temp.:
< 600
-F Resolution:
Not Used Cal Block Serial No.:
N/A Surface Condition:
BLENDED Lo Location:
Top Dead Center Field Orientation:
Longitudinal Magnetic Particle Material Brared:
Magnaflux vvet L]
Mixed:
Yes Li Applied By:
Dusting Type:
No. I Gray Dry i No l Spraying Li Bath No.:
84A047 Fiuorescent [I With:
N/A Flooding F-1 Equipment:
Parker Research Serial No.:
3975 Head Shot Z]
N/A Amperes Fixed Spacing F
AC L]
DC C
Adj. Spacing 2 -6 inches Encircling Coils 7]
N/A Turns Prods. Spacing NI /A inches Current (machine setting)
[]
N/A Amperes Indication Loc Loc Diameter Length Type Remarks No.
L W
R/L Ii Comments:
See sketch for limitations.
Results:
NAD WD IND [
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level 11 Date Reviewer Potter, Michael E.
I 2'12/2002 Hailing! Da' Examiner Level ii
. S11nature Date Site Review Loredo, Quirina I >__.
2/1212G02 Wren, Jerry Other Level N.'A Signature Date ANIW Review
___/
Clow, Ron rid A.
n 7ur 99,,'ýrý.
Limitation Record site/urRn of Cit n
P12 Summary No.:
5008310 Worksoope:
Isl Procedure:
Procedure Revisio,;FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-1 12
/
0106,946 Outage No.:
P!2RF2002 Report No.:
2002M016 Page:
2 of 4
Description of Limitation:
Hanger at Top D~ead Center.
Sketch of Limitation:
G:\\IDDEAL50ýPi2RFO2002\\SU'PPLEMENTAL MT\\2002m016_1.bmp TOP
,Vie Limitations removal requirements:
N/A Radiation field:
NI/A
Supplemental Report SUrmmry No,: 500830 Examiner: Potter, Michael E.
Examiner: Loredo, Quirino Other: N/A Report No.:
2002M016 Page:
3 of 4
Level; II Level:
11 Level:
N/A Reviewer: Hailing, David A.
Site Review: Wren, Jerry P.
ANII Review: Clew, Ron Date:
Date: 42/-'
Z.
Date:
-o_
Comments: None Sketch or Photo: G:\\IDDEAL50\\Pl2RF02002\\SUPPLEMENTAL MT\\2002m016 2,bmp G:\\IDDEAL50\\PI2RFO2002\\SUPPLEMENrAL MT\\2002m0' 63,brnp OW67>
Determination of Percent Coverage for Surface Examinations Site/Unit:
/
P12 Summary No.:
500830 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Revision/FC:
Work Order No.:
ISI-MT-1 12
/
0106946 Outage No.:
P12RF2002 Report No.:
2002M016 Page:
4 of 4
Area Required (as shown in applicable code reference drawing)
Length 72.000
- Width 2.250
= Total Area required 162.000 square inches Coverage Achieved Area examined 135.000 sq. in. ITotal area requ-red (100%)
162.000 sq. in.
Percent coverage
- /% (area required - area of limitations = area examined)
To determine length of a circumferential weld Note -
Diameter refers to actual external diameter rnot pipe size (see table below)
Diameter 0.000 (Pi) 3.1416 Length 0.000 inches uPipe Atal (Length)
Pipe Actual
'Length)
Size Diameter Circumference Size Diameter Crcumference 2
2.375 7.46
.12 12.75 40.06 2.5*
2,875 9.03 14
.140 43.9-8 3.5 11.0___
16 16.0 50.27 340 12.57 18 18.0 56.55 4
45 14.14 20 1
20.0
-62.83 j
5 5.563 17.48 22 22.0 F 69.12 6
6.625 20.81 24 24.0 1
75.40 8
8.625 27.10 j30 300 j
94.25 II.do.
10.75 33.77 Site Field Supe-visor:
/
U' Date:
Z2 g