LIC-03-0154, Relief Request Pertaining to Reactor Vessel Nozzle Inspection for Third 10-Year Interval Revision

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Relief Request Pertaining to Reactor Vessel Nozzle Inspection for Third 10-Year Interval Revision
ML033360485
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/2003
From: Ridenoure R
Omaha Public Power District
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LIC-03-0154 54-ISI-189-00, 54-PQ-189-01
Download: ML033360485 (103)


Text

- =

Omaha Public PowerDistnc 444 South 16th Street Afall Omaha NIE 68102-2247 November 21, 2003 LIC-03-0154 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

References:

1. Docket No. 50-285
2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1989 Edition and 1998 Edition through 2000 Addendum
3. ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII
4. Letter from OPPD (R. L. Phelps) to NRC (DCD), Relief Request Pertaining to Reactor Vessel Nozzle Inspections for Third 10-Year Interval, Dated October 22, 2003 (LIC-03-0146)

SUBJECT:

Relief Request Pertaining to Reactor Vessel Nozzle Inspections for Third 10-Year Interval, Revision This letter revises and replaces Reference 4 in its entirety. In Reference 4 OPPD indicated that we would provide the non-proprietary versions of the information needed for the subject relief requests by November 24, 2003. This submittal fulfills that statement.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i), FCS is requesting relief for the third ten-year interval from inservice inspection requirements of the 1989 Edition no Addenda,Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for the surface examination of Class 1, Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) nozzle-to-safe end welds. The examination requirement is for a surface and volumetric examination of ASME Section XI, Examination Category B-F, "Pressure Retaining Dissimilar Metal Welds", Item No. B5.10, "Reactor Vessel NPS 4 or Larger."

  • I FCS proposes to implement the requirements consistent with ASME Code Case N-615, "Ultrasonic Examination as a Surface Examination Method for Category B-F and B-J Piping Welds." FCS would implement the Code Case N-615 for the surface examinations for the six (6)

Reactor Pressure Vessel nozzle-to-safe end dissimilar metal welds, category B-F, item B5.10 for nozzle inspections performed during the 2003 refueling outage.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790, OPPD requests that the proprietary information herein be withheld from public disclosure. Framatome ANP, INC. considers this information to be proprietary as justified in the supporting affidavit (Attachment B). Attachments C and D are the proprietary Framatome documents, including a copy with the proprietary information annotated (i.e., a clean

_Ap)t Emplopent with Equal Opportunity

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission LIC-03-0154 Page 2 copy and an annotated copy). Attachments E and F are the non-proprietary (redacted) versions of Attachments C and D with the proprietary information deleted.

FCS requests approval of the proposed Relief Request, RR-9, by May 15, 2004.

Commitments made to the NRC in this letter are listed in Attachment G. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dr. R. L. Jaworski at (402) 533-6833.

R. .Rde ur Di sion anag r N learO erations Attachments: A) Fort Calhoun Station Relief Request B) Affidivit from Framatome ANP, Inc. Supporting Proprietary Nature of Referenced Documents C) Proprietary Versions of Framatome Report 54-PQ-189-01, Results from ID &

OD Clad Safe-end Mockup Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun D) Proprietary Versions of Framatome Procedure Number 54-ISI-189-00 ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws E) Non-Proprietary Version of Framatome Report 54-PQ-189-01, Results from ID

& OD Clad Safe-end Mockup Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun F) Non-Proprietary Version of Framatome Procedure Number 54-ISI-189-00 ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws G) Commitment Summary c: B. S. Mallett, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV (w/o attachments)

A. B. Wang, NRC Project Manager J. G. Kramer, NRC Senior Resident Inspector (w/o attachments)

LIC-03-01 54 Attachment A Page 1 ATTACHMENT A Fort Calhoun Station Relief Request Use of Code Case N-615 Surface Examination Method for RPV Nozzle-to-Safe End Welds

LIC-03-0154 Attachment A Page 2 ISI Relief Request RR-9 Use of Code Case N-615 Surface Examination Method for RPV Nozzle-to-Safe End Welds System: Reactor Vessel Class 1 Category: B-F Item No.: B5.10 ALTERNATIVE EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS:

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(i), FCS is requesting relief for the third ten-year interval from inservice inspection requirements of the 1989 Edition no Addenda,Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for the surface examination of Class 1, Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) nozzle-to-safe end welds. The examination requirement is for a surface and volumetric examination of ASME Section XI, Examination Category B-F, "Pressure Retaining Dissimilar Metal Welds", Item No. B5.10, "Reactor Vessel NPS 4 or Larger."

FCS proposes to implement the requirements consistent with ASME Code Case N-615, "Ultrasonic Examination as a Surface Examination Method for Category B-F and B-J Piping Welds." FCS would implement the Code Case N-615 for the surface examinations for the six (6) Reactor Pressure Vessel nozzle-to-safe end dissimilar metal welds, category B-F, item B5.10 for nozzle inspections performed during the 2003 refueling outage.

JUSTIFICATION FOR GRANTING RELIEF The Ultrasonic examination techniques utilized for this examination are qualified by demonstration to meet the requirements of Code Case N-615. The use of these qualified techniques assures that the dissimilar metal welds remain free of service related flaws thus enhancing quality and ensuring plant safety and reliability.

The work required to support these surface examinations without implementing Code Case N-615 includes labor to remove/replace the cover plates over the six (6) reactor nozzles, and labor to remove/replace the sand above the nozzles. The surface inspections of the outside weld surfaces are limited due to the tight space and no access to the very bottom of the welds. The area dose rate is estimated to be about 120 mr/hr with the head on. The dose in the cavity surrounding the nozzles is unknown. An ex-core detector was removed from one of the nozzle boxes last outage and read 40,000 mr/hr. The surface dose rate near the welds would be very close to these detectors. Therefore, the implementation of this Code Case reduces the radiation exposure by several man-rem while providing an acceptable level of quality and safety.

LIC-03-0154 Attachment A Page 3

Background

The qualification documentation and the procedure for the qualification of the Ultrasonic Examination Technique used at the Fort Calhoun Station during the 2003 refueling outage to perform the surface examinations of the reactor vessel B-F welds are included in Attachment B and Attachment C respectively.

The ultrasonic examinations were performed during the fall 2003 refueling outage and no surface indications were identified.

LIC-03-01 54 Attachment B Page I Attachment B Affidivit from Framatome ANP, Inc Supporting Proprietary Nature of Referenced Documents

AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )

) ss.

CITY OF LYNCHBURG )

1. My name Is Gayle F. Elliott. I am Manager, Product Licensing, for Framatome ANP 'FANP"), and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.
2. I am familiar with the criteria applied by FANP to determine whether certain FANP information is proprietary. I am familiar with the policies established by FANP to ensure the proper application of these criteria.
3. 1am familiar with the FANP reports 54-ISI-189-00 and 54-PQ-189-01 and referred to herein as "Document." Information contained in this Document has been classified by FANP as proprietary in accordance with the policies established by FANP for the control and protection of proprietary and confidential information.
4. This Document contains information of a proprietary and confidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by FANP and not made available to the public.

Based on my experience, I am aware that other companies regard information of the kind contained in this Document as proprietary and confidential.

5. This Document has been made available to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence with the request that the information contained in the Document be withheld from public disclosure.
6. The following criteria are customarily applied by FANP to determine whether information should be classified as proprietary:

(a) The information reveals details of FANP's research and development plans and programs or their results.

(b) Use of the information by a competitor would permit the competitor to significantly reduce its expenditures, in time or resources, to design, produce, or market a similar product or service.

(c) The information includes test data or analytical techniques concerning a process, methodology, or component, the application of which results in a competitive advantage for FANP.

(d) The information reveals certain distinguishing aspects of a process, methodology, or component, the exclusive use of which provides a competitive advantage for FANP in product optimization or marketability.

(e) The information is vital to a competitive advantage held by FANP, would be helpful to competitors to FANP, and would likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of FANP.

7. In accordance with FANP's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in this Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside FANP only as required and under suitable agreement providing for nondisclosure and limited use of the information.

B. FANP policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.

9. The foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

SUBSCRIBED before me this j___t day of & _ , 2003.

Ella F. Carr-Payne NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 8131105 Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia i i My Cowissiofn Exp& Aug 31.20

Results from ID& OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun 54-PQ-1 89-01 Prepared by: Date: 09124103 M.W. Key, UT Level 111 Approved by: /. A L M. G. Hacker. UT Level Ill Date:09124103 Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP.

II INC AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE II REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN II WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO II OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER II PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRANIATOME ANP.

II INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON

- - - - -II REQUEST.

Page of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup AFRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Objectives:

The objective of this demonstration was to document the detection of opposite surface cracking through the ID & OD cladding surrounding the safe end. A secondary objective was to document the detection of side drilled holes through the welds.

Background:

Prior to the 2003 RFO RPV 10-year examination, the need to demonstrate Framatome ANP inspection techniques on component configurations unique to Fort Calhoun was required.

The safe ends employed by Fort Calhoun are made of forged stainless steel (CCSS) with cladding on both ID and OD surfaces. To facilitate this demonstration, a block with cladding on both ID and OD surfaces was obtained from see Figure 1. Framatome ANP P01 -- Deleted: Indian Point l procedure 54-ISI-821 was used as a template for the opposite surface flaw detection. it was 54-ISI-821 that served as a foundation for the development of 54-ISI-189 that became the specific examination procedure for use at Ft. Calhoun.

Summary:

The results of the demonstration show that opposite side cracks were detected., . Deleted: The sizing results fromthe opposite side scan shows an average length sizing error of 40.190 (over Demonstration Setup: call), an average depth sizing error of O.077' (under call). I Inspection of the demonstration block was performed at EPRI with Framatome ANP X/Y scanner (see Figure 2). The cladding on the ID surface is hand blended to a smooth surface when compared to the OD clad surface roughness (See Figure 1) which is also hand blended but to as lesser extent. The opposite side inspection was performed to the requirements of 54-ISI-821 with the exception of scanning sensitivity (material noise set to 10% FSH), transducer selection, and the acquire range (larger than procedural requirements). Both axial (normal to side drilled holes) and circumferential scans (parallel to side drill holes) were made on each surface.

The demonstration block contains two surface connected thermal fatigue cracks located in the safe end material on the surface representing the OD. The cracks are identified as "G" and "H" and have the following dimensions:

Flaw l Orientation ' Length I- ' Ratio ; Depth l -Depth% l. Tilt -l G Circ. 0.500- 1 2.5:1 0.200" 8% 0° H Axial 0.500" 2.5:1 0.200" 8% 0 Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMIATOME ANP, INC. AND IS LOANED UPON 0 CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE II REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN r WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTiIERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMIATOME ANP, INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON

'Axial defined as normnal to the weld.- REQUEST.

Page 2 of 19 I

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Deleted: IPP-RV-73 I I The following transducers were used to inspect block #; ., . .

Deleted: Sigma (Deleted: Sigma I. [21

.__ . , SURFACE (OPPOSITE SIDE FLAWS)

.] o 'ID .Deleted: RTD C 31i

- - ~~~~~Focal- / Deleted: A3231-06.51.35 ..=4 Manf'. An :e2 .' .Fre SSI e N Deleted: 3 1.Deleted: Not Possible: Mockup

. -. - -- - - - - - - - - -i _f geometry does not permit detection from this direction with this transducer due to the location of hoie E and the edge of the ID clad. In addition not k

on clad surface. See Figure 3. =..5 [

Results: Deleted: 45/S 1.6 [6 IA The results from flaw detection and sizing are presented in the following tables. The scan ( Deleted: A3231-07.08.55 CC?7i direction X directs the ultrasonic beam parallel to the welds and thus is sensitive to flaw G".

Deleted: N/Al Likewise, scan direction Y" directs the beam perpendicular to the welds and is sensitive to Beam Propagation wrong direction for flaw H". In those cases where the flaw was detected, a signal to noise ratio is given in the detection !8 parenthesis for that specific scan.

DETECTION: OPPOSITE SIDE EXAMINATION RESULTS (SCAN SURFACE: ID)

IIh~ Deleted: Det. (5:1)19 Length: 0.591 Depth: 0.167' Angle IMode Manf. - Filename Scan Dr. Flaw "G" Flaw "H" -F

( I4 Deleted: A3231.07.23.1 1 Deleted: 5 Deleted: Not Possible: Mockup (7

block width does not permit detection from this direction with this transducer. See Figure 5.

Deleted:A3231.07.31.40 F 1r1o1 l-, ,,' -I / Deleted: A3231 .mI[

.077 I57 4Deleted: 7 Deleted: Det (4:1)11 II Length: 0.791 I-_ Depth: 0.084-l.lDeleted: A3231.07.59.15 ( 1 I Deleted: 8 Deleted: Not Possible: Mockup block width does not permit detection from this direction with this DETECTION (nt.): OPPOSITESIDE EXAMINATION RESULTS (SCAN SURFACE ID)I 'I transducer. See Figure 6.

IMode Man.:

-I_ _

Fillena me Dir. =FlawG - Flaw H" l FIg.: 1/ Deleted: 45/L

/,i~~~~~~~~

Deleted: A3231-08.10.47 F........r

.. (141 W

Deleted: A3231-08.29.04 ...[151 l~~ ~~ I ~ ~~~ I I ~I ~ 1 ~ ~~1 1________

Deleted: 45-S... 45-L I ...(161 Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE I PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC. AND IS LOANED UPON I CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE l The results indicate that the, is capable of detecting flaw EGG while not detecting flaw "H". - REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN Conversely, theis capable of deecting flaw -I:while not detectingflaw "G". WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO II OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER

Conclusion:

PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOMbIt

-Y. .- - -

I Page 3 of 19 I

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Based on the analysis of the data collected from the demonstration block, opposite surface flaws of the size and type found in the block can be detected using the search units specified in this report.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the $ransducer be used to examine the OD surface of the Pipe See -- Deleted: RTD Appendix A for further information - Deleted: It Is further recommended that because the mockup shape and configuration did not allow interrogation of flaws through the weld and the historical experience of fimited shear wave propagation through austenitic materials, the use of longitudinal wave transducers be utilized.

Deleted: TIllS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN WIIOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR FURNISIIING INFORMATION TO OTHERS. OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ INC., AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup FAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP l Figure 1: Side View of CRC DM Piping Block#.-.... _ndiZn Deleted: Point

- j Deleted: IPP-RV-73 Deleted: TIllS DOCUMENT IS THE I PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP.

j INC. AND IS LOANED UPON I CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE I REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN I WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR W^'# -CS: Be' s, I I FURNISHING INFORMATION TO i OTHERS. OR FOR ANY OTHER I

I PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMSATOM E ANP.

INC. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 5 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 2: Framatome ANP X/Y Scanner Setup Deleted: TilIS DOCUMENT IS TIlE PROPERTY OF FRAMATONIE ANP, INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION TAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO 9.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I OTHERS. OR FOR ANY OTHER Page 6of19~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC, AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Results from ID& OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 3: Opposite Side Scan, Flaw "G" (Beam: X+) -- Deleted: 45S I I

Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

-.- xea I~

Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP.

I INC. AND IS LOANED UPON I CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE A REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN I

I WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR I FURNISHING INFORMATION TO I OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER I

I PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 7 of 19

Results from ID& OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 4: Opposite Side Scan,Flaw "G" (Beam: X-) _ . - l Deleted: 45'S I I

I Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

I fI . *. -I Deleted:

Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT E REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS. OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 5: Opposite Side Scan, Flaw "H" (Beam: Y-)- [ Deleted: 45-S I l Arrow length indicates wheretransducer placement should be for detection I . >t C Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR FURNISHING INTORMATION TO

________ _________________________________~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

___________________ OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER Page 9of19~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC, AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 6: Opposite Side Scan,Flaw "H" (Beam: Y-) - - Deleted: 451S

- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- r- Acusm Dbua

,__ ________ __ -Is~~~~~~Cho DJI 2 l Arrow length indicates wheretransducerplacement should be for detection.

LI. Li IlI I t-t~~~~~~~L E l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I S. Deleted' , JOb Deleted: 5-Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THlE PROPERTY OF FRANIATOME ANP.

INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC.. AND ISTO RETURNED UPON

-'-u .I Page 10 of 19

Results from ID &OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Eigure 7: Opposite Side Scan,Flaw "H" (Beam: Y-) Deleted:F Deleted: 45-L Arrow length indicates where jransducerplacemrrent should be for detection.

0 l t41 §! lu---------- --

I . ..~~~~~L D v 2.

41*,

k~~, =

Deleted:

Deleted: 45-Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE I PROPERTY OF FAMATOME ANP, I

I INC. AND IS LOANED UPON 0 CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE I REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN I

0 WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR 1 FURNISHING INFORMATION TO i OTHERS. OR FOR ANY OTHER II PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE I INTERESTS OF FAMATOME ANP.

INC., AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

v - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -II Page 11 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 8: Opposite Side Scan,Flaw "H" (Beam:Y+) -- Deleted: 451L l Arrow length indicates where,transducer placement hould be for detection

_ _ _ _ ~~~~7-------.-----

I_ I1l, liii 2L Al..

Deleted:

Deleted: 45-Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RE QU EST.

Page 12 of 19

Results from ID &OD Clad Safe-end Mockup AFRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 9: Opposite Side Scan, Faw "G" (Beam: X+ _ Deleted: 45-L l I *_ _ _ _ _ _.__ _- - _ __E 21MZZ CMDDMC Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

I i- ': a.;..' I  !.:' i Deleted:

Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC AND IS LOANED UPON i CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE i REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN II WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR I FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERSOR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 13 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 10: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "G" (Beam: X-)- - tDeleted: 451L I I , -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , =

a Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE I REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC., AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 14 of 19

Results from ID& OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun APPENDIX A: rRANSDUCER RESULTS -. j Deleted: LONGITUDINAL WAVE

Background:

IPrevious experience using forflaLw detection trough austenitic welds indicate that ultrasoundq Ipenetration can be limited. In those cases, arq frequentlyue _o provide_ ,p tration

... .eereaerwae

-was..reer1

.Iniu~

through the welds.

Summary:

The results of the demonstration show that all side drilfled holes were detected.

Demonstration Setup:

Same demonstration setup as used during the crack detection.

The following transducers were used for detection of side drilled holes:

ID SURFACE (OPPOSITE SIDE FLAWS)

Manf.I Anale IFrer.I Sze Dnh Mordl'

- - - -- ___I___ ,_.,t Deleted: Sigm- _

I - I-

- -I- - - - I - 1 - - 1 ---. - 1 - 1 - ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~

1~__________ ____________,7 Sg I.n igi The , did not show consistent or repeatable detection of the side drilled holes- and therefore - -- DIeltd 4 will notb inclue n ths work scope.

Results:

The side drilled hole detection results are presented in the following table:

Deleted: A3231-08.0.047

. Angle 1: , 1"  !- ,:.' 1Scan .;'.~ Side Drill Hole '

MoeManf. _'~~:Filename .tIDir.. I ;B. 1~~C. I --D j:I.: jEI .F .IFio Deleted: 1E12 N. Deleted: Sigm I

~~~~~~-

- I

_--I--- - - -

-I------I--7 I - I -

--- VI T-I--- Deleted: 45lL 2F


-I __-. . -- -- -- z. 1

'Detection not possible due to component configuration.

- - - I~l~i!L~ mI::------

Recommendation: I Deleted: A3231-10.02.19 EM.[6 I it is recommended that thelpansducers be used inconjunction with the lransducer to assure..- Deleted: 45L ...45*S wave F .. _[271 adequate penetration through the we-lds that make up the component-. Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITON THAT ITNOT BE II REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN II WHOLE OR IN PART. OR USED FOR I FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS. OR FOR ANY OTHER II PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE I INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -: REQUEST.

Page 15 of 19 I

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP I Figure 11: "ID" Side Scan with,(Beam: X+) l Deleted: 45-L (21GW-1 Mhz) I Holes "A", "B", " and "F" I .I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  • ~~ l ~ ~~~~~~~

Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrows indicate beam propagation.

I Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE I PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP, 0 INC AND IS LOANED UPON 1 CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE 6 REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN II WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR I FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 16 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 12: "ID" Side Scan with,(Bearn: X-) - Deleted: 45L (21GW-I Mhz) I Holes "A", "C", T", "E" and T"F 2MW22 COVDDSX tY-Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Hole FA" detected off clad surface. Arrows indicate beam propagation.

l Deleted: - l Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE I PROPERTY OF FRAMATOMIE ANP.

I INC. AND IS LOANED UPON I CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE i

REPORDUCED OR COPIED. IN I

I WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO II OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER F

PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRANIATOME ANP, II INC., AND IS TO RETURNED UPON I

REQUEST.

- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I Page 17 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 13: "OD" Side Scan with (Bea:r X+) . I Deleted: 45-L (21FG - 2 Mhz) I Holes "A", "B", "C" and "D" I , . _

Arrows indicate beam propagation.

Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS TIlE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP.

I INC AND IS LOANED UPON II CONDMnON THAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN II WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR II FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC.. AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 18 of 19 I

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 14: "OD" Side Scan with,(Beam: X-) lDeleted: 45-L (21FG-2 Mhz)

Holes "A", "B", "C", "D" "E", AND T"F

. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I . . _

STAMLIMS CDDMM Hole ECU detected off clad surface. Arrows indicate beam propagation.

I . .;. I, -

.4I 15.0 :. I :1

1,, , ; "';_1 i r A Deliid-Vt
lt:U:U. - I Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRANIATOME ANP.

INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR

____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER Page190f19~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.

INC., AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 3: [1] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Sigma Page 3: [1] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM, 450 L Page 3: [1] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 1Mhz

  • Page 3: [1] Deleted . default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 2(1.0" x 0.6")

Page 3: [1] Deleted . default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 2.25" Page 3: (1] Deleted default . ... 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 21GW

  • Page 3: [2] Deleted .. default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Sigma Page 3: [2] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM..

45 0L Page 3: [2] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 2Mhz Page 3: [2] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 2(0.7 x 0.4")

Page 3: [2] Deleted - default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 1.5" Page 3: [2] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 21 FG Page 3: [3] Deleted . default . . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM RTD Page 3: [3] Deleted . default . ' . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 450S EL Page 3: [3] Deleted . default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 2Mhz Page 3: [3] Deleted . default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM EII(16 x 10)

Page 3: [3] Deleted . . -.default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Page 3: [3] Deleted default .. 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 95-420

Page 3: [4] Deleted default - . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_06.51.35 Page 3: [4] Deleted default .11/18/2003 5:55 PM X+

Page 3: [5] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Not Possible: Mockup geometry does not permit detection from this direction with this transducer due to the location of hole E" and the edge of the ID clad. In addition not on clad surface. See Figure 3.

Page 3: [5] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: [6] Deleted default .11/18/2003 5:55 PM 45/S Page 3: [6] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM RTD

- Page 3: [7] Deleted - default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_07.08.55 Page 3: 17] Deleted - default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM X-Page 3: [8] Deleted default , 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: [8] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 4

Page 3: [9] Deleted - default  :. 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_07.23.11 Page 3: 9] Deleted . default ' - . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Y+

Page 3: 9] Deleted default  : 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: [10] Deleted default - 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_07.31.40 Page 3: [10] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Page 3: [10] Deleted . default .11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: [10] Deleted . default .

  • - , 11/18/2003 5:55 PM NDD Page 3: [10] Deleted.. default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 6

Page 3: [11] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_07.47.57

Page 3: [11] Deleted deal ,11/18/2003 Y-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5:55 PM.

Page 3: 11] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: [12] Deleted , default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_07.59.15 Page 3: (12] Deleted default , 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Y+

Page 3: [12] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: (13] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM.

45/L Page 3: [13] Deleted , - default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Sigma Page 3: 114] Deleted , - - default, 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_08.10.47 Page 3: [14] Deleted default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM X+

Page 3: 14] Deleted , , - default , 11/18/2003 5:55 PM Not Possible: Mockup geometry does not permit detection from this direction with this transducer due to the location of hole WE" and the edge of the ID clad. In addition not on clad surface. See Figure 9.

Page 3: [14] Deleted - - default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: [14] Deleted default - - - 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 9

Page 3: [15] Deleted - default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM A3231_08.29.04 Page 3: [15] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 5:55 PM X-Page 3: [15] Deleted , default 11/18/2003 5:55 PM NDD Page 3: 15] Deleted , default , - 11/18/2003 5:55 PM N/A Beam Propagation wrong direction for detection Page 3: [15] Deleted default - - 11/18/2003 5:55 PM 10 Page 3: [16] Deleted default , 11/18/2003 6:12 PM 450 S Page 3: [16] Deleted 'default 11/18/2003 6:12 PM 450 L

Page 1: [17] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:14 PM THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC. AND IS LOANED UPON CONDITION THAT IT NOT BE REPORDUCED OR COPIED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC., AND IS TO RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

Page 15: [18] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:04 PM.

shear waves Page 15: [18] Deleted default j 11/18/2003 6:05 PM longitudinal waves Page 15: [18] Deleted - default .11/18/2003 6:05 PM greater Page 15: [19] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM,.

Sigma

Page 15: [19] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 45 0L Page 15: [19] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 1Mhz Page 15: [19] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 2(1.0" x 0.6")

Page 15: [19] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 2.25" Page 15: [19] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 21GW Page 15: [20] Deleted default. 11/18/2003 6:00 PM Sigma Page 15: [20] Deleted -. default .: 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 45 0L

  • Page 15: [20] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 2 Mhz Page 15: [20] Deleted. default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 2(0.7" x 0.4")

Page 15: [20] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 1.5"

  • Page 15: [20] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 21 FG Page 15: [21] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM A3231_08.10.47

Page 15: [21] Deleted default , , 11/18/2003 6:00 PM X+

Page 15: [21] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [21] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [21] Deleted default - 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [21] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM NPt Page 15: [22] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM Nt Page 15: [22] Deleted default., 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [23] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM A3231_08.29.04 Page 15: [23] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM X-

-,,Page 15: [23] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [23] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM NPt Page 15: [23] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [23] Deleted , ' default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [24] Deleted default - 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [24] Deleted - . default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [25] Deleted, . .,. default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM A3231_10.15.46 Page 15: [25] Deleted -default .11/18/2003 6:00 PM X+

Page 15: [25] Deleted default d , , 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [25] Deleted default .11/18/2003 6:00 PM.

DET Page 15: [25] Deleted ' default ' 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [25] Deleted  : default , 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [25] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM -

NPt Page 15: [25] Deleted default . , 11/18/2003 6:00 PM

Nt Page 15: 25] Deleted. default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 13 Page 15: [26] Deleted default... . 11/18/20036:00 PM A3231_10.02.19 Page 15: [26] Deleted default .11/18/2003 6:00 PM X-Page 15: [26] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM.

DET Page 15: [26] Deleted .default 11/ 18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [26] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [26] Deleted'dfal 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [26] Deleted default- 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [26] Deleted default . 11/18/2003 6:00 PM DET Page 15: [26] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:00 PM 14 Page 15: [27] Deleted -default 11/18/2003 6:07 PM 450 L Page 15: [27] Deleted default 11/18/2003 6:07 PM 450 S wave

A FRAMATOME ANP FRAMATOME ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws Procedure Number 54-ISI-1 89-00 Issue Date: September 16, 2003 Prepared by: 9/16/2003 M. W. Key Level III Approved by: 9/16/2003 M. G. Hacker Level III Deleted: THISDOCUMENT ISTHE 10 PROPERTY OFFRAMATOJE ANP.INC.

ANDISLOANED UPON CONDITIONTHAT 11 BE REPRODUCED ORCOPIED,IN 1 ITNOT VHOLE ORINPART. ORUSEDFOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TOOTHERS.

II ORFOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE I DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTSOF FRAUATCEIE ANDISTO BE ANP.INC.,

I RETURNED UPON REOUfST I----------------------------------------------------------------------I

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Record Of Revision Rev. Page Para. # Description of Change I_

00 I All I All I Initial Issue Deleted: THS DOCUWENT ISTHE II PROPERTY OFFRAMAATOME ANP,INC.

I ANDISLOANED UPON CONDITION THAT ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED, IN I WHOLE ORINPART, ORUSED FOR I FURNISHING INFORMATION TOOTHERS.

OR FORANYOTHER PURPOSE I DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP.INC.,

ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REQUESTS I

Page 2 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-P- 189-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Scope..............................................................................................................................4
2. Surface Preparation ..................... 4
3. Personnel Qualifications .................... 4
4. Equipment.......................................................................................................................5
5. Areas Of Interest ..................... 7
6. Scan Plan .................... 8
7. System Calibration ..................... 14- - Ddeted:
18. Scanning Requirements .................... 14 -- D]eted: 14
9. Data Analysis .................... 14
10. Data Recording ..................... 16 - Deted: 17
11. Rescans/Supplemental Scans .................... 17 ------ {detd 8
12. Reporting ..................... 18 A Deleted: THISDOCUMENT IS THE Ij PROPERTY OF FRAMATOIE ANP.INC, ANDIS LOANEDUPONCONDITION THAT I ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED. IN I WHOLEORIN PART,ORUSEDFOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, I ORFORANYOTHERPURPOSE I DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- FRAMATOME ANP,INC,ANDIS TO BE RETURNED UPONREOUESTS I

Page 3 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

1. Scope 1.1 This procedure shall govern the automated contact ultrasonic examination for OD initiated flaws in full penetration dissimilar metal piping welds and wrought, austenitic piping welds and adjacent base material by scanning from the ID surface.

1.2 The objective of the examinations performed in accordance with this procedure is to detect and characterize outside surface connected service induced discontinuities within the specified examination area.

1.3 Where accessible, examinations shall be performed from both sides of the weld with the beam directed perpendicular and parallel to the weld.

1.4 This procedure has been demonstrated by scanning the inside surface of shop weld configurations containing clad on both the ID and OD surfaces.

2. Surface Preparation 2.1 This procedure has been demonstrated using as-welded component configurations.

However, if ultrasonic coverage of the required examination volume is limited due to surface conditions, the conditions shall be documented and reported to the owner for disposition.

3. Personnel Qualifications 3.1 There are three basic categories of personnel involved in performing this examination.

They are calibration personnel, data acquisition personnel, and data analysis personnel described as follows:

3.2 Calibration Personnel are responsible for performing the ultrasonic calibrations and calibration checks and shall be qualified to at least Level II or higher in accordance with the Framatome ANP written certification practice. These personnel shall have received special training in the use of the automated data acquisition (ACCUSONEXTm ) system and are qualified to establish calibrations in accordance with specific procedure requirements. A qualified UT Level II or Level Ill data analyst must review calibrations or calibration checks.

3.3 Data Acquisition Personnel are responsible for operating the data acquisition system Deleted: THISDOCUMENT ISTHE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOME ANP,INC.,

do not require training or certification in the ultrasonic method because their activity is " ANDISLOANED UPON CONDITION THAT limited to operation of equipment only and they do not make decisions concerning ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED,IN VWHOLEORINPART, ORUSED FOR system configuration or the ultrasonic data Itself. Their activity is limited to operation of FURNSHING INFORIAATIONTO OTHERS, the system controls that execute pre-established scan plans. All equipment settings OR FORANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAAATOME ANP.INC..

ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST.S Page 4 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI189-00 I I ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~54-PQ-189-01 I

considered essential variables can be independently verified with the recorded data by the data analyst.

3.4 Data Analysis Personnel are responsible for performing the data analysis functions detailed within this procedure and for assuring that all of the requirements concerning the data acquisition and analysis identified in this procedure have been met. The data analysis personnel shall be qualified to at least a Level II or higher in accordance with the Framatome ANP written certification practice.

4. Equipment 4.1 The remote ultrasonic examination equipment shall consist of an automated data acquisition and analysis system (ACCUSONEXTM), an encoded manipulator, the Deleted: R/D Tech pTomo appropriate intermediate cabling, and transducers. I Deleted: pTomo j Deleted: RID Tech Pulser/Receiver 4.2 ACCUSONEXTm Data Acquisition and Imaging System Main Board

'F.

Deleted: EQTX10OC 4.2.1 ACCUSONEXT consists of an automated data acquisition and an analysis " Deleted: Pulser Receiver Piggy system. The data acquisition system is capable of collecting and digitizing the . 1Boards (Number of boards vary depending upon the number of ultrasonic data, recording time and amplitude of indications which exceed a

  • channels that the system Is
  • ' configured for) preset recording threshold and recording the manipulator position coordinates at the time the signal exceeds the threshold. The analysis system is capable of , ~

Dlr>eted:

  • jFI ~

EOTx1O1D DI displaying the recorded data in various formats (A-scan, B-scan, C-scan, and D- ,"' Deleted: R/D Tech Digitizer (CPU) scan) to aid in analysis of the data. The ACCUSONEXTm data acquisition system . Deleted: EOTXO9EC consists of the components described in Table B. The ACCUSONEXT data Deleted RID Tech remote analysis system consists of the components described in Table C. pulser/receiver

'I Deleted: CU Table B - ACCUSONEX" Data Acquisition System Deleted: RID Tech Pulser/Receiver Main Board Item Component Model Number Deleted: EOUX097D I Deleted: Pulser Receiver Piggy

" . Boards (Number of boards vary I~~~I1' ',depending upon the number of

" channels that the system Is configured for)

Deleted: EOUX093F

,' Deleted: Version 6.4 Deleted: Version 6.4 2 I Deleted: Standard PC

' Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT ISTHE PROPERTY OFFRAbtATOiE ANP.INC, 3 ACCUSONEX m Data Acquisition Software A,,NO ISLOANED UPON CONDITIONTHAT ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED. IN 4 ACCUSONEX'm Calibration Software WHOLE ORINPART, ORUSEDFOR 5 Computer System with Storage Device FURNISHING INFORMiATIONTO OTHERS.

ORFORANYOTHER PURPOSE Note: Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 are considered essential variables of the acquisition DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF system. Later versions of thbACCUSONEX-software (items 3-and 4) may be- FRAMTOME ANP. AND RETURNED UPON INC.. ISTO BE REQUEST.S Page 5 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 I54-P-189-01 used if the revision does not affect the derivation of amplitude and/or time values Deleted: Standard PC of the recorded data. Deleted: Hard Disk to Deleted: Generic Table C -ACCUSONEXm Data Analysis System Deleted: Version 3.12 Item Component ] Model Number i, ,,l 1 1Coinputer System 9 1 _finrlnf nninil-rI

[

I, Deleted: The cables nterconnecting the pITomo and the remote pulser consist of up to 171 feet of length with

~~~- -- vw1vu ua a maximum of four Intermediate connectors. The cables 3 Color Printer , _ _ _ _

Interconnecting the remote pulser and 4 JACCUSONEX Data Analysis Software , _,, the transducers consist of up to 70 feet of length with four Intermediate Note: Item 4 is considered an essential variable of the analysis system. Later connectors. This configuration has version of the analysis software may be use if the revision does not affect the been successfully demonstrated.

Reduced cable lengths and imaging displays, the derivation of amplitude, and/or the time values of the intermediate connectors are recorded data. acceptable for use without further demonstrations. Figure 1represents a typical qualified cable configuration.¶ 4.3 Manipulator Deleted: 16mm x 0mm I Elliptical 4.3.1 An encoded manipulator shall be used. The manipulator shall be capable of I Deleted: Axial &Circ Flaw Detection providing positional data from a given reference mark, have the ability to i &Sizing control transducer positioning relative to component axis, and provide Deleted: RTD 103-887 adequate force to keep the transducer coupled to the scan surface. The Deleted: 45- S-wave manipulator shall be capable of performing scanning and indexing Deleted: 2.0 MHz requirements In accordance with this procedure. Deleted: Single Deleted: Flat 4.4 Transducer Cables Deleted: 1.0 x 0.601 Rectangular 4.4.1 The interconnecting cable consists of RG-174 (co-axial) cables., - I Deleted: Axal &Circ Flaw Detection

&Sizing A;. i 4.5 Transducers Deleted: Sigma 121GW Deleted: 45' L-wave 4.5.1 Transducers listed in Table D are qualified for use with this procedure. 2 Deleted: 1.0 MHz Transducers selection shall be based upon the intended application from the i Deleted: Dual following table. Deleted: 2.25-

-"I*-," _

Table D Deleted: o.r x 0.40'

% I ,,I, Rectangular Transducer Selection Mfg. Nominal Nominal StleFocal Element Application Deleted: Axial &Circ Flaw Detection

I IModel Angle/Mode Frequency Style Depth l_Size/Shape ____ I I, -

&Sizing v _a_no__-- -- t -- l^ - - -'l- ---- l- --- - - --- --- -- -- -- - - -- Deleted: Sigma/ 21FG 1,

1 1 Deleted: 45- L-wave Deleted: 2.0 MHz V _I_ _v '---T.----I----

_ _ _ _v _ -- _ _ w __ t_ lI _ _ _ _ _ l _- _ _ -- -

_ _ _ - I, Deleted: Dual Deleted: 1.5' Deleted: THIS DOCUtENT IS THE PROPERTY OFFRA1tATOtdE ANP, INC 4.6 Water shall be used as the couplant to perform the calibrations and the examinations.- ANDIS LOANED UPONCONDITION THAT IT NOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPI..i1 I

Page 6 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws54-11I 189.00 54-PQ-189-0I 4.7 Reference Blocks 4.7.1 Transducer exit point verification shall be performed using a stainless steel IW or Rompus block.

4.7.2 Verification of transducer refracted angle, establishing a linear time base, and establishing a reference level for subsequent examinations shall be performed using a stainless steel Side Drilled Hole calibration block similar to the design shown in Figure 2.

4.7.3 Calibration confirmation checks shall be performed on radius blocks capable of producing repeatable signal responses within the calibrated time base.

5. Areas of Interest 5.1 The specified examination volume consists of the weld and 1/2" of base material on both sides of the weld for a depth of 1/2" as illustrated in Figure 3.

5.2 Limitations to the examination volume described in Figure 3 shall be documented in the examination report.

Deleted: THIS DOCUMENT ISTHE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOM.E ANP, INC, I ANDISLOANED UPONCONDITION THAT ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED. IN YMOLE ORINPART. ORUSED FOR FURNISHING INFORMUATION TO OTHERS, ORFORANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF V._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FRAPAATOME ANP.INC..ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REO(EST.¶ Page 7 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

6. Scan Plan 6.1 Prior to the examination, scan plans shall be developed to ensure the required examination area is scanned with the proper scanning parameters.

6.2 The component geometry shall be reviewed to determine coverage and scan distances.

As a minimum the Scan Plan shall identify the scan coordinates that bound the area to be scanned and the transducer head layout with the corresponding transducer offset for each transducer.

6.3 The scan plan shall be reviewed by a data analysis qualified in accordance with paragraph 3.4 to ensure that the requirements of this procedure have been met. No adjustments may be made to the scan parameters after the scan plans have been established without the concurrence of a qualified data analyst.

6.4 Scans will be designated by a Scan Identification Number (SIN) and Subscan Identification to allow the analyst to determine the area examined. The scan identification number and subscan identification shall be identified on the scan plans.

6.5 Scanning shall be performed in a raster pattern in both the axial and circumferential directions. A typical transducer head arrangement used for the examination is shown in Figure 4.

6.6 The following parameters listed in Table E shall be used to establish the scan plan database.

WDeted: TlIS DOCUMENT ISTHE PROPERTY OFFRAMATO.IE ANP,INC..

ANDISLOANED UPON CONDMON THAT ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED,IN WHOLE ORINPART. OR USEDFOR FURNSHING INFORAATION TO OTHERS, ORFOR ANYOTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF

- - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - - FRAMATOME ANP,INC.,

ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST.S I

Page 8 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 4-PO-189-01 Table E UT System Parameters System Transducer Comments _ - - {Deeted: 4S Parameter ,_ -- - -- -- -_ - - - - - - - - - -_ - - - - - - - - - -

Deleted: 45L RF _-_-______

This is-the minimum amplitude that a peak must have to-be- IDeleted 45 L Threshold (RG)----------

Threshold____(recorded at RUN gain. Deleted: No G ain A djust -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - 'D.leede:  %

__ __ Ths value establishes the numberof sequentiaLwaveforms that wil be- Deleted: Dual Coincidence compared point by point before feature extraction algorithms are applied. Deleted: Dual Deleted: Dual Rect. Mode Deleted: 11

- - -- -- This is the minimum gain normalized amplitude that a peak must have Threshold (CG) to be to be recorded.

FW This feature permits the insertion of a delay between subsequent pulses if it Isdetermined that the pulse repetition rate Istoo high. The Deeted: I Delay _atuesie rnitsarecd nrns. Normally, a Valdeof'D-1s tUSed-unless- 0%

evidence of wrap-around Isnoted In the data. If wrap-around is noted. Deeted: OS increase the delay value in .1 ms increments until the signal disappears.

PR Mode h -Z ---- ---- --- -- ---- ---- I-I Deleted: Single Deleted: Dual Pulse Width Pulser Source - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- -- - Deleted: Dual "II

- - - - - - - The pulser voltageIsfor surface profile scan may belensure that the- 250 Pulser Voltage surface response notthesaturated. %IIA\'Deleted:

G ain Boost -- -- -- - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - --- - -- -- -- - . " Deleted: 250 I

The systems ability to keep up with recording UT data Isa function of 'N' Deleted: 500 several variables and can be controlled by reducing the scan speed. I'N The data analyst can determine during the analysis of the data file f Delted:LUse 500for the mHz

,",transducer Scan Speed *-- - - - - - - -the scanspeed-was tofastforthe system torecord the data of interest-that are indicated as Intermittent areas of no data along the scan line .N Deletedt: Extemnal that isnot contributed to coupling effects. If the analyst determines the Deletect: adjusted lwer to data is unacceptable due to an excessive scan speed a rescan shall be performed at a slower scan speed. N'Deletedt: 300 Index Increm ent - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . Deleted: None This isthe interval at which data Iscollected along the scan line. The pulse repetition rate is a function of the speed at which the Deleted: Maximum Speed frI sec.

ACCUSONEXT" data acquisition system can be configured to take Deleted: 0.15'

- - -- -- multi-channel data during automatic operation The pulse repetition.

Sync. Interval rate is set by the delay and length of the acquire window and the Deleted: I 0.05' processing time for each A-scan. The pulse repetition rate is not available to the operator as an adjustable control on the system. For the circumferential directed probes, the sync. Interval shall be l Deleted: 1. 2. 31

,_______________ converted to degrees based on the largest diameter being scanned. I Active Channel -- - -- - Select the channels that are to be-active during the scan.- - - - - - (Deleted: 1¶ I

I J Deleted: THISDOCUMENT ISTHE Display Channel - - - - - - - - Activates the-channel to be displayed during acquisition. - - - - - - I PROPERTY OFFRAMtATOME ANP.INC.

ANDISLOANED UPON CONDITION THAT I IT NOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED. IN I WOXE ORINPART, ORUSED FOR I FURNISFtI3 INFORMtATION TOOTHERS.

I I ORFORANYOTHER PURPOSE I DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRAMATOME ANP.INC, ANDISTOBE RETURNED UPON REOUEST1J I

Page 9 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

7. System Calibration 7.1 The amplifier vertical and amplitude control linearity shall be verified before and after examining all welds required to be examined. Linearity shall be verified using the digitized waveform provided by the data acquisition system.

7.1.1 Vertical Linearity 7.1.1.1 The ability of the amplifier to provide a linear output for 100 percent of the vertical range shall be verified by the following steps:

7.1.1.1.1 Position a search unit so that echoes can be observed from any two reflectors In a material.

7.1.1.1.2 Adjust the search unit position to give a 2-to-1 ratio of the amplitudes between the two echoes with the larger set at 100% full screen height (FSH) and the smaller at 50% FSH.

7.1.1.1.3 Without moving the search unit, reduce the gain in 2 dB increments to decrease the larger echo to at least 20%

FSH and record the amplitude of the smaller echo on the Instrument Control Linearity Sheet.

7.1.1.1.4 The amplitude of the smaller reading must be 50% of the larger reading within +/-5% FSH. The settings and readings must be estimated to the nearest 1% of FSH.

7.1.2 Amplitude Control Linearity 7.1.2.1 The linearity of the amplitude controls of the ultrasonic instrumentation shall be verified using the steps outlined below.

7.1.2.1.1 Position a search unit so that an echo can be observed from a reflector in a material.

7.1.2.1.2 With the increases and decreases in the stepped gain control shown In the following table, the indication must fall within the specified limits below: Deleted: THISDOCUIAENT IS THE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOME ANP.INC.

ANDIS LOANEDUPONCONDITION THAT rr NOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED. IN WHOLEOR IN PART.ORUSEDFOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, ORFORANYOTHERPURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAPATAAE ANP,INC, ANDIS TO BE RETURNED UPONREOUEST.¶ Page 10 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PO-189.01 Indication set at dB Control Indication limits, %

%of FSH change of full screen 80% -6 dB 32 to 48%

80% -12dB 16 to 24%

40% +6dB 64 to 96%

20% +12dB 64 to 96%

7.2 A static or dynamic calibration shall be established for each transducer utilizing the applicable reference block using the peak amplitude of the reflectors to develop the appropriate sweep range and reference level.

7.3 Transducer exit points shall be measured and documented prior to use using either a rompus or IW block meeting the requirements of paragraph 4.7.1. The refracted angle shall be checked and documented using a side drilled hole that produces the highest amplitude response in order to obtain an accurate and repeatable measurement.

7.4 Prior to calibration the following system parameters that effect the calibrations shall be set for each applicable setup and channel in accordance with Table F.

Table F UT System Parameters System Transducer Comments Parameter Deleted: 45-5 XDCR Freg. (Filter)

Deleted: 45-L TR Freq.

(Digitization Rate) --- .- I I. Deleted: 45 L 5'

Rect (Rectification "I* Deleted: 2.25 MHz M ode) , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- \ _ .

Deleted: 2.25 MHz This value establishes the number of sequential Coincidence Mode waveforms that will be compared point by point Deleted: 1 MHz

\.

___________ __before featuredextraction algorithms-are apprled- Deleted: 25 MHz A\

S5% Deleted: 25 MHz

,8 Deleted: 12.5 MHz 7.5 Calibrations may be performed using different cables between the acquisition system Deleted: FW and the transducer as compared to the configuration used for actual scanning. When Deleted: 1 separate cables are used for the calibrations they shall consist of the same cable type, Deleted: remote pulser. pltomo lengths (+/- 6 feet), and number of intermediate connectors as those used for the Deleted: THISDOCUIENT ISTHE examination. When performing the calibrations with different cables then those used ,' PROPERTY OFFRAMATDOE ANP.INC, for the examination, a comparison of signal responses (time and amplitude) between ,', AND IS LOANED UPON rrNOTBEREPRODUCED CONDITlON ORCOPIED, THAT IN the calibration and examination cables is required for the complete system (cable, ,', WHOLE ORINPART, ORUSED FOR intermediate connectors,, and transducer) foreach applicable channel. When required,, FURNSHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, ORFORANYOTHER PURPOSE the cable comparison shall be performed in accordance with the following paragraphs. , DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAMATOUIE ANP.INC..ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST.1 I

Page 11 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI -189-00 54-PQ-189-01 7.5.1 Upon completion of the system calibrations, a baseline response shall be documented for the complete system (cable, intermediate connectors, remote pulser, ptomo, and transducer) for each applicable channel. This is performed using a rompus block meeting the requirements of paragraph 4.7.1.

7.5.2 The response from the radius of the rompus block shall be maximized and recorded for comparison to the examination cable. The time and amplitude shall be documented by printing the A-scan image of the response that shows the gain level, signal amplitude, and depth/pseconds of the reflector.

7.5.3 When the examination system is configured with the cable configuration to be used for the examination, the response from the rompus block radius shall be captured again with the examination cables in accordance with paragraph 7.5.2.

7.5.4 The response shall be compared to determine if any compensation for amplitude or time is required prior to performing the examination.

I 7.5.4.1 Any variation in amplitude greater than,dB shall be compensated for by - eleted:2 adjusting the calibration gain level by the amount determined from the comparison for each channel requiring adjustment.

7.5.4.2 Any variation in time greater tharn shall be compensated for by -- [Deleted: 1 psec adjusting the position of each calibration point by the amount determined from the comparison for each channel requiring adjustment.

7.6 Time Base Calibration Deleted: 0.75', 1.50-, and 2. 5' side 7.6.1.1 A calibrated time base shall be established for the angle beam transducers dnied hole using the nominal reflectors from a reference block that meets the material ,' Deleted: 80 requirements of paragraph 4.7.2. Mark their position and amplitude using the Deleted: 1I16- diameter side drilled location markers in the calibration window, then adjust the markers to/t.%FSH_,' Deleted: at .25' depth In the and save the setup. reference Deleted: side drilled hole 7.7 Enter the appropriate calibration information (Transducer ID, manufacture, calibration ,' Deleted: 80 block, etc.) in the calibration header. Deleted: primary reference (Deleted: comparison for future 7.8 Calibration Gain (Cal Gain) , Deleted: so that the material noise averages 10% FSH 7.8.1 The primary reference sensitivity (Cal Gain) for the angle beam transducers will a"' Deleted: THISDOCUMENT ISTHE be established using the peak amplitude from ajhole reflector located block for "h"" ' PROPERTY ANDISLOANED OFFRAMATOMJE UPON ANP,INC CONDITlION THAT each transducer. Adjust the jesponse to %°/(- 5/) FSH. This shall be the ,"' rr NOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED. IN Jevel to be used forexaminations. ----- WiOLE ORINPART, ORUSEDFOR 9 --------------------------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FURNISHING OR FOR INFORMATION ANYOTHER TO OTHERS.

PURPOSE 7.9 Scanning sensitivity (run gain) for each inspection angle shall be set DETRiMENTAL TO THEITERESTS OF I ___

FRAMATOE ANP. INC,ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REOUESTS Page 12 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTnVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 I I~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~54-PQ-189-01 I

7.10 The acquire window (relative to the gate start position) establishes the range of data to be recorded by the data acquisition system.

7.10.1 The acquire window shall start at a depth ofand extend to at least" beyond - CDeetedJ:-0.20Iorless the thickness of the material. The corponent shall be considered when-establishing the required range. - eted: ID/OD contours of t 7.11 Calibration Confirmation 7.11.1 Upon completion of the initial system calibrations, the calibration confirmation baseline shall be established. This is performed by copying the initial calibration setup to a setup designated to be used for the calibration checks.

7.11.2 Perform a scan of the reference blocks meeting the requirements of paragraph 4.7.3 with each transducer using the designated calibration setup. The same block shall be used for all subsequent measurements. However, the same block need not be used for each transducer.

7.11.3 In the analysis mode, use the beam select feature to capture two reflectors that will be used to measure amplitude and depth responses. Record these values for reference. This baseline response will be used to evaluate future performance of the complete system during the confirmation checks.

7.11.4 Perform all subsequent calibration checks In the same manner and record the amplitude and depth responses.

7.11.5 Intermediate calibration checks shall be performed at approximately, when 12-hour Intervafs D_---deted:

cable changes are made from the initially calibrated set, or at any point where the analyst suspects malfunction of the system.

7.11.6 A final calibration check shall be performed on the reference block upon completion of examinations.

7.11.7 Signal response during calibration checks or the final calibration must be within

. of the initial sweep reading anddB of the initial amplitude response. If anyof - -eted: 0.05 the reference points fail to meet these requirements, the following steps shall -Deleted: 3 be completed:

7.11.7.1 All examinations since the last successful calibration shall be oDeeted: HsDocUMENrIsTHE evaluated by a qualified analyst to determine the effects of the , PROPERTYOFFRAWTOMCEANINC..

calibration check results. Rescans shall be issued for any data I NTNOTBEREPRODUCEDORCOPIE that is evaluated as deficient. , WHOLEORINPARTORUSED FOR ORFORANYGOI-ER PURPOS E 7.11.7.2 Correct the calibration for future data collection. DETRIMENTALTOTHE INTERESTSOF

- -- -- -- -- - FRAIATCUAE APINC..AND ISTO BE RETURNED UPON REOUESTS Page 13 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

8. Scanning Requirements 8.1 The temperature of the component to be examined shall not exceed 1200 F.

8.2 The scanner shall be calibrated to provide accurate positional information in relationship to the component. This will be accomplished by using the applicable operating instruction (01) for the scanner being used for the examination.

8.3 The system operator shall select the appropriate scan plan to be executed from the previously entered database.

9. Data Analysis 9.1 Refer to Figure 5 during data analysis for a flow chart of the analysis process 9.2 Weld fabrication and examination data histories, if available, shall be reviewed prior to analysis of the ultrasonic examination data.

9.3 Following the completion of scanning, the ultrasonic data shall be reviewed to assure that the data quality (contact, signal to noise, coupling, etc.) is adequate to properly perform an effective evaluation of the examination data. The data shall also be reviewed to verify that the scanning parameters specified in Sections 6 and 7 were utilized and sufficient. If any of the scan parameters require adjustment, the scan plan shall be revised and rescans performed as necessary. All subsequent scanning shall be made using the revised parameters.

9.4 The analyst shall update and apply the geometry file by inputting the beam angle, beam direction, transducer offsets, and component geometry as applicable, (refer to the scan plan) for each scan to assure that the proper location of indications are reported.

9.4.1 Curvature correction shall be applied to adjust the data to the proper depth and circumferential position when using flat calibration blocks.

9.4.2 The transducer beam orientation is used to set the transducer beam direction with respect to the index coordinates for the specific channel. The range of this parameter is 0 to 360 degrees. The +X orientation is 0 degrees and means that the transducer beam direction is in the positive index direction. Likewise, the -X orientation is 180 degrees and is the negative index direction. The analyst can verify that the correct beam direction orientation has been entered by verifying Deleted: THISDOCUIENT IS THE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOAE ANP.IN.,

that the proper target motion is display on the screen based on the scan plan ANDIS LOANEDUPONCONDITION THAT information. , rITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED.IN VHOLE ORINPART.ORUSEDFOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TOOTHERS 9.5 The recorded data shall be analyzed to the extent that the analyst can determine the ORFORANYOTHERPURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF classification and location of the idications that meet the data recording criteria.-, FRAMATCM.E ANP,IN; ANDIS TO BE RETURNED UPONREQUEST.S Page 14 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 544-1I89-00 I I ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~54-PQ-189-01 I

Indications are defined as coherent patterns of signals observed in the B, C,or D-scan images that exhibit target motionin the beam direction. The following steps should be followed in the initial evaluation process of the ultrasonic data to aid determining the origin of the recorded reflectors.

9.5.1 Recall the data for the channel being analyzed. Using the expand" feature, display the weld volume from a point at least before the componenrtQP_- -- eee:05 I surface to -,past the OD surface.- -------------- eee:10 9.5.2 Adjust the color palette range to provide resolution of the various reflectors throughout the scan. Several palette ranges should be evaluated in order to provide optimum Image contrast. Too small of a color range may mask flaw indications with the background noise of the component, while too large of a palette range may not properly display low amplitude indications.

9.5.3 Investigate areas of suspect indications in accordance with paragraphs 9.7 and 9.8. At this point the data that projects into the examination volume should be investigated to view the full target motion of the suspected surface connected flaws. For weld configurations that produce geometric responses due to the inside surface the data shall be evaluated with beam angle correction applied and removed to properly evaluate potential flaw indications that may be obscured by the geometric responses. This allows the analyst to identify indications that have target motion, which may have been obscured in the angle corrected views.

9.6 Indications shall be classified as either geometric or non-geometric (flaw indications).

The following paragraphs provide some general guidelines when evaluating examination data with suspected geometric ndications.

9.7 Geometric indications are likely to be detected from weld counterbores and weld roots when the beam is directed toward the reflector. This type of indication will normally exhibit a fairly continuous pattern in the D-scan and C-scan images and may be localized in areas or extend a full 360' around the weld. Geometric indications usually exhibit consistent target motion across the length of the indication. For the examinations being performed in accordance with this procedure from the inside surface, geometric indications are usually detected for shop weld configurations from weld root or counterbore conditions. Care should be taken when analyzing data near IIDeleted: (at least 3 consecutive suan I Ilines) of distinct target motion geometric indications as they may obscure flaw signals. I I , Deleted: background noise levels Deleted: TDISDOCUM.ENT ISTHE 9.8 Indications that cannot be dispositioned as geometric indications and meet the , PROPERTY ANDISLOANED OFFRALIATOIIE UPON ANPINC,.

COMM~ON THAT applicable criteria specified below shall be classified as flaw indications. ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED.IN WHOLE ORINPART. ORUSED FOR FURNISING INFORMAATION TOOTHERS, 9.8.1 Flaw Indications usually exhibit themselves as localized areas ~n ek' ORFORANYOTHER PURPOSE amplitudes greater than.._,,,,,,==,,==,=,=,=,f DETIMENTAL TOTHEINTERESTS OF FRAMATCME ANP. INC..ANDISTOBE RETURNED UPON REOUEST.1 Page 15 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI- 189-00 54-PO-189-01 9.8.2 The intent of this procedure is to detect outside surface connected cracks, however the techniques utilized may also detect other types of flaws which have length and depth (lack of fusion, slag) that have to be evaluated by the analyst.

9.8.3 Cracks are surface connected and may appear as isolated indications or multiple related indications within the examination region. When a flaw indication is embedded in a high amplitude surface geometric response the target motion of the flaw response will normally extend through the geometric response.

9.8.3.1 The position of the flaw in relationship to the transducer position, geometric configuration restrictions, flaw orientation (tilt and skew) and position (side of the weld) will affect the flaw response, i.e. a surface flaw may not provide target motion to the surface if the geometry restricts transducer contact over the flaw or the flaw orientation is not favorable to the side of the weld where the transducer is positioned, etc.

Questionable indications shall be evaluated from both sides of the weld to ensure proper interpretation of the data.

9.8.4 Non-geometric indications that connect to the outside surface shall be considered planar type flaws. Indications that produce images, which display target motion that extends to or beyond the outside surface, (when viewing the B and D scan displays), shall be considered surface connected indications.

10. Data Recording 10.1 The reflector position, depth, and amplitude at the point of maximum amplitude shall be documented for geometrical or fabrication type indications 50% or greater than the primary reference level. These shall be identified as geometric or fabrication indications on the data sheet. These types of indications are recorded for reference only when comparing past and future examination results.

10.2 Surface connected flaw indications shall be reported regardless of amplitude. Data from other scan directions and/or transducers should be used to confirm the presence of flaw indications where possible.

10.3 The location, amplitude, and length shall be documented for each flaw indication as described in the following paragraphs: Deleted: THISDOCUMENT ISTHE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOME ANP.INC..

ANDS LOANED UPON CONDION THAT 10.3.1 The location of the flaw along the pipe axis (for circumferential flaws) or around ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED,IN the circumference (for axial flaws) shall be recorded. The surface position shall WHOLE ORINPART. ORUSEDFOR FURNISHINGINFOR)ATION TO OTHERS.

be measured at the point where the target motion intersects the outside ORFOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE surface of the component. Where the target motion of a surface connected DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP,INC..

ANDISTO BE flaw does not extend to thevdutid`suiface duI 1o flaw positonrelativ fothe RETURNED UPON REQUEST.1 Page 16 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~54-Pa-1894(10 geometry, extend the target motion following the same angle until it intersects the outside surface to determine the flaw position.

10.3.2 Record the maximum amplitude of the indication. For many flaw indications the flaw response may be saturated. If the flaw response is saturated, record the maximum measured amplitude and also indicate that the flaw response is saturated.

10.3.3 Length:

10.3.3.1 For determining the flaw end points the B-scan should be expanded to display the outer 1.0" of material to properly provide the surface position of the indication. Length measurements should be taken at I the end points along the flaw axis where the flaw image - - Deleted: Isobscured by background noise levels using the C-scan with the flaw image expanded to provide 10.3.3.2 For length sizing of circumferentially oriented flaws the adequate resolution of the proper endpoint scan line or the Beam measurements shall normally be taken from the flaw orientation or Profile display surface geometry condition provides a better response, - -

Deleted: same side of the weld that the flaw Islocated on, unless the 10.4 Areas of limited examination coverage shall be recorded in the examination Deleted: from the other side of the report. Limitation of coverage of the examination volume from the inside surface weld of the component is usually due to surface geometry that does not allow the transducer to be scanned over the surface or maintain contact. These regions can be identified using the B, C, and D-scan images. To determine the amount of limited coverage measure the areas of transducer liftoff on the image. Both the axial and circumferential extents shall be documented for each transducer and beam direction. The surface profile scan may be performed if more detailed evaluation of the surface condition is required to provide a more precise estimate of limited coverage.

11. Rescans/Supplemental Scans 11.1 The analyst may identify additional scans in order to satisfy the requirements of this procedure or to re-perform scans of areas that are considered inadequate.

11.2 Supplemental examinations, performed in addition to the examinations required by procedure, are acceptable to provide additional information to help resolve or confirm results, provided they are not used to overturn results obtained with the qualified techniques or provide additional coverage of limited areas. Deleted: TIIS DOCUkIENT IS THE II PROPERTY OFFRAMlATOME ANP.INC, ANDIS LOANEDUPONCONDION THAT 11.3 Data analysis personnel shall be responsible for initiating all instruction for Rescans or I IT NOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED, IN I WHOLE ORIN PART.ORUSEDFOR Supplemental scans. I FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS.

I ORFORANYOTHERPURPOSE V~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAMATCE.E ANP.INC AND ISTO BE RETURNED UPONREQUESTS1 I

Page 17 of 24

FRAMATOME.ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

12. Reporting 12.1 The results of the examination shall be reported to the customer. All indications shall be individually processed and evaluated by a qualified analyst. Any area where limited or no examination was performed shall be documented and reported to the customer. A copy of the examination data shall be provided to the customer. As a minimum the following information shall be included; 12.1.1 Scan plan 12.1.2 Calibration records 12.1.3 Date and time of calibration, calibration checks, and examination 12.1.4 Names of and certification levels of examination personnel 12.1.5 Examination procedure number and revision 12.1.6 Calibration block identification 12.1.7 ACCUSONEXTM data acquisition system identification number 12.1.8 Transducer frequency, size, angle, mode, and serial number 12.1.9 Cable type, length, and number of intermediate connectors 12.1.10 Calibration reflector amplitude and depth values 12.1.11 Acquisition and analysis software versions 12.1.12 Couplant 12.1.13 Weld identification 12.1.14 Examination surface 12.1.15 Beam orientation in relationship to the pipe Deleted: THISDOCUMENT ISTHE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOME ANP.INC, ANDISLOANED UPON CONDITIONTHAT rTNOTBEREPRODUCED CRCOPIED.IN WHOLE ORINPART, ORUSED FOR FURNISHINGINFORMAllON TO OTHERS, ORFORANYOTHER PURPOSE DETRMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP,INC,ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REDUEST Page 18 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-IS- 189-00 54-PQ-189-01 l

- Deleted: COPY

- - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Figure 1 Typical Qualified Cable Configuration Deleted: THIS DDOCUIENT IS THE PROPERTY OF MATOME ANP,INC.,

ANDISLOANED UPONCONDITION THAT ITNOTBEREPRO DUCEDORCOPIED.IN WHOLE ORINPAR IT. ORUSEDFOR FURNISHNG INFC ORMATIONTO OTHERS, ORFORANYOTH ERPURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO'THEINTERESTS OF

- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - -- -- - --- - -- -- - - FRAMIATOME MAP PINC. ANDIS TO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST I

Page 19 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-1SI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

- ' Deleted: 'sp>

Deleted: THISDOCUMENT IS THE II PROPERTY OFFRAMATOME ANP,INC, ANDIS LOANEDUPONCONDITION THAT II IT NOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED,IN WIOLE ORINPART.ORUSEDFOR FURNISHING INFORLiATIONTO OTHERS.

Figure 2 - Typical Calibration Standard I ORFORANYOTHERPURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - FRAMATOIJE ANP,INC..ANDIS TO BE RETURNED UPONREOUESTS Page 20 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Examination Volume for Dissimilar Metal Welds A-B-C-D Figure 3 - Examination Volume Deleted: THISDOCUMENT ISTHE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOME ANP,INC.,

ANDISLOANED UPON CONDMTION THAT ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED,IN WHOLE ORINPART, ORUSEDFOR II FURNSHING INFORMATION TOOTHERS, OR FORANYOTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF FRAMAATOME ANP.INC..

ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REOlEST.

Page 21 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-Pa-189 l-_ - Comment: Please check all paragraph references and you may want to Include documentation of limited scan areas.

t Deleted: 45L I

,_ - _ _ -_- _ _- _-_- . Ddeted:45L Deleted: 45S j I - =. . . . . . Deleted: 45L I I . I t Deeted: 45S 1 Deleted: 45L t _ _ _ _

I v

Figure 4 Typical Transducer Head Arrangement Deleted: TiS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRMAIATOCIE ANP,INC.

ANDIS LOANED UPONCONDION THAT I IT NOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED, IN I WHOLEORINPART.OR USEDFOR I FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, I ORFORANYOTHERPURPOSE I DETRIMENTAL TO THEINTERESTS OF T- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRA)ATOIE ANP,INC. ANDIS TO BE RETURNED UPONREOLEST.11 I

Page 22 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PO-189-01 Deleted: THISDOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OFFRAMATOME ANP,INC..

ANDISLOANED UPON CONDmON THAT ITNOTBEREPRODUCED ORCOPIED.IN WHOLE OR INPART. OR USEDFOR FURNISKNG INFORMAATIONTO OTHERS, Figure 5 -Data Analysis Flow Chart I ORFORANYOTHER DETRIMENTAL PURPOSE TO THEINTERESTS OF I - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - FRM1ATCME ANP,INC.,ANDISTO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST.1 I

Page 23 of 24

I Page 2: [1] Deleted -

.. .. default .... , . . .11/18/2003 4:52 PM:

THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF FRAMATOME ANP. INC., AND ISLOANED UPON CONDITION THAT ITNOT BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED, INWHOLE OR INPART, OR USED FOR FURNISHING INFORMATION TO OTHERS, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTERESTS OF FRAMATOME ANP, INC.. AND ISTO BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST.

LIC-03-0154 Attachment E Page 1 ATTACHMENT E Non-Proprietary Version Of Framatome Report 54-PQ-189-01 Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun 54-PQ-1 89-01 Prepared by: Date: 09/24/03 M. W. Key, UT Level Il Approved by: /. A Date:09/24103 M. G. Hacker, UT Level Il Page 1 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Objectives:

The objective of this demonstration was to document the detection of opposite surface cracking through the ID & OD cladding surrounding the safe end. A secondary objective was to document the detection of side drilled holes through the welds.

Background:

Prior to the 2003 RFO RPV 10-year examination, the need to demonstrate Framatome ANP inspection techniques on component configurations unique to Fort Calhoun was required.

The safe ends employed by Fort Calhoun are made of forged stainless steel (CCSS) with cladding on both ID and OD surfaces. To facilitate this demonstration, a block with cladding on both ID and OD surfaces was obtained from (see Figure 1). Framatome ANP PDI procedure 54-ISI-821 was used as a template for the opposite surface flaw detection. It was 54-1SI-821 that served as a foundation for the development of 54-ISI-189 that became the specific examination procedure for use at Ft. Calhoun.

Summary:

The results of the demonstration show that opposite side cracks were detected.

Demonstration Setup:

Inspection of the demonstration block was performed at EPRI with Framatome ANP X/Y scanner (see Figure 2). The cladding on the ID surface is hand blended to a smooth surface when compared to the OD clad surface roughness (See Figure 1) which is also hand blended but to as lesser extent. The opposite side inspection was performed to the requirements of 54-ISI-821 with the exception of scanning sensitivity (material noise set to 10% FSH), transducer selection, and the acquire range (larger than procedural requirements). Both axial (normal to side drilled holes) and circumferential scans (parallel to side drill holes) were made on each surface.

The demonstration block contains two surface connected thermal fatigue cracks located in the safe end material on the surface representing the OD. The cracks are identified as "G" and H" and have the following dimensions:

Flaw Orientation 1 Le'ngth r.Ratio Depthe 'Depth% -Tilt..'

G Circ. 0.500" 2.5:1 0.200" 8%

H Axial 0.500" 2.5:1 0.200" 8% 00 l Axial defined as normal to the weld.

Page 2 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP The following transducers were used to inspect block #:

  • ., .E "

In~I SCAt(% If DDIn IT= QlRn =I AlAI'-  :-

:;- >.~~~~~. '-;.--::;-::!; .j~Focal-:---

-iManf '--:;Anajle',i ;:'_ Fre4 ;;  :--: Si :: et. -Si.-

Results:

The results from flaw detection and sizing are presented in the following tables. The scan direction X"directs the ultrasonic beam parallel to the welds and thus is sensitive to flaw "G".

Likewise, scan direction Y" directs the beam perpendicular to the welds and is sensitive to flaw "H". In those cases where the flaw was detected, a signal to noise ratio is given in the parenthesis for that specific scan.

DETECTION: OPPOSITE SIDE EXAMINATION RESULTS (SCAN SURFACE: ID)

'Angle Scan IMode ;Manf.- . ilename i:Dir.;- Flaw "G" Flaw"H" DETECTION (cont.): OPPOSITE SIDE EXAMINATION RESULTS (SCAN SURFACE: ID)

Angle. -I .-.;:- -;: . -- ; ;Scan-iMode Manf.- Filename : ir. Flaw "G1 Flaw "H" Fig, The results indicate that the is capable of detecting flaw G" while not detecting flaw "H'.

Conversely, the is capable of detecting flaw "H: while not detecting flaw "G".

Conclusion:

Page 3 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Based on the analysis of the data collected from the demonstration block, opposite surface flaws of the size and type found in the block can be detected using the search units specified in this report.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the transducer be used to examine the OD surface of the Pipe. See Appendix A for further information Page 4 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 1: Side View of CRC DM Piping Block #

Page 5 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 2: Framatome ANP X/Y Scanner Setup Page 6 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 3: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "G" (Beam: X+)

tLYWt22 CMVDMO I ,

Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

Page 7 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 4: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "G" (Beam: X-)

2z1VMt2 ODDSo I a Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

Page 8 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup AFRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 5: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "H" (Beam: Y+)

Arrow length indicates where transducer placement should be for detection 1~ - - - I _

L1"1 I ID I:IIII11IV I C i {- eX~oa~rr i EI IlI I r 2o7 S%. I3 Ilb

.9L Page 9 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup AFRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 6: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "H" (Beam: Y-)

Arrow length indicates where transducer placement should be for detection.

Page 10 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 7: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "H" (Beam: Y-)

Arrow length Page 11 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup AFRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 8: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "H" (Beam:Y4)

Arrow length Page 12 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 9: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "G" (Beam: X+)

£a Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

Page 13 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 10: Opposite Side Scan Flaw "G" (Beam: X-)

S .- . _

Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrow indicates beam propagation.

Page 14 of 19

Results from ID& OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun APPENDIX A: TRANSDUCER RESULTS

Background:

Previous experience using for flaw detection through austenitic welds indicate that ultrasound penetration can be limited. In those cases, are frequently used to provide penetration through the welds.

Summary:

The results of the demonstration show that all side drilled holes were detected.

Demonstration Setup:

Same demonstration setup as used during the crack detection.

The following transducers were used for detection of side drilled holes:

i'-- SURFACE (OPPOSITE SIDE FLAWS)

B;-;:-;-ID Focal:

Manf Angle

'~~~~nl -af'F--Freg. Size ,Depth ep Model M> .............-t..S-,,lth ,.......O The did not show consistent or repeatable detection of the side drilled holes and therefore will not be included in this work scope.

Results:

The side drilled hole detection results are presented in the following table:

Angle- . -,,Scan[

Side Drill Hole ..

IMode' ManI Filename JA IB .iDir.

lC .D :EIF-Fi

'Detection not possible due to component configuration.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the transducers be used in conjunction with the transducer to assure adequate penetration through the welds that make up the component.

Page 15 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup AFRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 11: "ID" Side Scan with (Beam: X+)

Holes "A", "B", "C" and "F" UiVM 2 CDDXM4 I .

Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Arrows indicate beam propagation.

Page 16 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 12: "ID" Side Scan with (Beam: X-)

Holes "A", "C", "D", "E" and "F"

, a a Cross section shown in reverse to demonstrate location of scanning transducer. Original drawing scanned then mirrored. Hole A" detected off clad surface. Arrows indicate beam propagation.

Page 17 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun FRAMATOME ANP Figure 13: "OD" Side Scan with (Beam: X+)

Holes "A", "B", "C" and "D" I I 4 Arrows indicate beam propagation.

Page 18 of 19

Results from ID & OD Clad Safe-end Mockup A

FRAMATOME ANP Block Demonstration for Fort Calhoun Figure 14: "OD" Side Scan with (Beam: X-)

Holes "A", ", "C", "D" "E", AND "FJ Hole "C"detected off clad surface. Arrows indicate beam propagation.

Page 19 of 19

LIC-03-0154 Attachment F Page 1 ATTACHMENT F Non-Proprietary Version Of Framatome Procedure Number 54-ISI- 189-00 ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws

A FRAMATOME ANP FRAMATOME ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws Procedure Number 54-ISI-189-00 Issue Date: September 16, 2003 Prepared by: -e (  % - 9/16/2003 M. W. Key Level IlIl Approved by: in

  • ,.A M. G. Hacker Level III

.9/16/2003

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Record Of Revision Rev. Page Para.# l Description of Change 00 All All Initial Issue Page 2 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-1 89-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Scope..............................................................................................................................4
2. Surface Preparation ...................... 4
3. Personnel Qualifications ..................... 4
4. Equipment.......................................................................................................................5
5. Areas Of Interest ...................... 7
6. Scan Plan ..................... 8
7. System Calibration ..................... 10
8. Scanning Requirements ..................... 14
9. Data Analysis ..................... 14
10. Data Recording ..................... 16
11. Rescans/Supplemental Scans ..................... 17
12. Reporting...................................................................................................................... 18 Page 3 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

1. Scope 1.1 This procedure shall govern the automated contact ultrasonic examination for OD initiated flaws in full penetration dissimilar metal piping welds and wrought, austenitic piping welds and adjacent base material by scanning from the ID surface.

1.2 The objective of the examinations performed in accordance with this procedure is to detect and characterize outside surface connected service induced discontinuities within the specified examination area.

1.3 Where accessible, examinations shall be performed from both sides of the weld with the beam directed perpendicular and parallel to the weld.

1.4 This procedure has been demonstrated by scanning the inside surface of shop weld configurations containing clad on both the ID and OD surfaces.

2. Surface Preparation 2.1 This procedure has been demonstrated using as-welded component configurations.

However, if ultrasonic coverage of the required examination volume is limited due to surface conditions, the conditions shall be documented and reported to the owner for disposition.

3. Personnel Qualifications 3.1 There are three basic categories of personnel involved in performing this examination.

They are calibration personnel, data acquisition personnel, and data analysis personnel described as follows:

3.2 Calibration Personnel are responsible for performing the ultrasonic calibrations and calibration checks and shall be qualified to at least Level II or higher in accordance with the Framatome ANP written certification practice. These personnel shall have received special training in the use of the automated data acquisition (ACCUSONEXTm) system and are qualified to establish calibrations in accordance with specific procedure requirements. A qualified UT Level II or Level Ill data analyst must review calibrations or calibration checks.

3.3 Data Acquisition Personnel are responsible for operating the data acquisition system do not require training or certification in the ultrasonic method because their activity is limited to operation of equipment only and they do not make decisions concerning system configuration or the ultrasonic data itself. Their activity is limited to operation of the system controls that execute pre-established scan plans. All equipment settings Page 4 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-lSI-189-00 54-PQ-1 89-01 considered essential variables can be independently verified with the recorded data by the data analyst.

3.4 Data Analysis Personnel are responsible for performing the data analysis functions detailed within this procedure and for assuring that all of the requirements concerning the data acquisition and analysis identified in this procedure have been met. The data analysis personnel shall be qualified to at least a Level II or higher in accordance with the Framatome ANP written certification practice.

4. Equipment 4.1 The remote ultrasonic examination equipment shall consist of an automated data acquisition and analysis system (ACCUSONEX m), an encoded manipulator, the appropriate intermediate cabling, and transducers.

4.2 ACCUSONEXTm Data Acquisition and Imaging System 4.2.1 ACCUSONEXTM consists of an automated data acquisition and an analysis system. The data acquisition system is capable of collecting and digitizing the ultrasonic data, recording time and amplitude of indications which exceed a preset recording threshold and recording the manipulator position coordinates at the time the signal exceeds the threshold. The analysis system is capable of displaying the recorded data in various formats (A-scan, B-scan, C-scan, and D-scan) to aid in analysis of the data. The ACCUSONEXTM data acquisition system consists of the components described in Table B. The ACCUSONEXTm data analysis system consists of the components described in Table C.

Table B - ACCUSONEXTm Data Acquisition System Item Component Model Number l

2 3 ACCUSONEXm Data Acquisition Software 4 ACCUSONEXTM Calibration Software 5 Computer System with Storage Device Note: Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 are considered essential variables of the acquisition system. Later versions of the ACCUSONEX software (items 3 and 4) may be Page 5 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 used if the revision does not affect the derivation of amplitude and/or time values of the recorded data.

Table C - ACCUSONEXM Data Anal sis System Item Component Model Number 1 Computer System 2 Storage Device_

3 Color Printer _

4 1ACCUSONEX'M Data Analysis Software I Note: Item 4 is considered an essential variable of the analysis system. Later version of the analysis software may be use if the revision does not affect the imaging displays, the derivation of amplitude, and/or the time values of the recorded data.

4.3 Manipulator 4.3.1 An encoded manipulator shall be used. The manipulator shall be capable of providing positional data from a given reference mark, have the ability to control transducer positioning relative to component axis, and provide adequate force to keep the transducer coupled to the scan surface. The manipulator shall be capable of performing scanning and indexing requirements in accordance with this procedure.

4.4 Transducer Cables 4.4.1 The interconnecting cable consists of RG-174 (co-axial) cables.

4.5 Transducers 4.5.1 Transducers listed in Table D are qualified for use with this procedure.

Transducers selection shall be based upon the intended application from the following table.

Table D Transducer Selection Mfg. Nominal Nominal Sl Focal I Element

/Model Angle/Mode Frequency Style Depth Size/Shape Application 4- 4 4. 1 4 4 4 + + 4 4 4 4.6 Water shall be used as the couplant to perform the calibrations and the examinations.

Page 6 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 4.7 Reference Blocks 4.7.1 Transducer exit point verification shall be performed using a stainless steel 11W or Rompus block.

4.7.2 Verification of transducer refracted angle, establishing a linear time base, and establishing a reference level for subsequent examinations shall be performed using a stainless steel Side Drilled Hole calibration block similar to the design shown in Figure 2.

4.7.3 Calibration confirmation checks shall be performed on radius blocks capable of producing repeatable signal responses within the calibrated time base.

5. Areas of Interest 5.1 The specified examination volume consists of the weld and 1/2" of base material on both sides of the weld for a depth of 1/2" as illustrated in Figure 3.

5.2 Limitations to the examination volume described in Figure 3 shall be documented inthe examination report.

Page 7 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01

6. Scan Plan 6.1 Prior to the examination, scan plans shall be developed to ensure the required examination area is scanned with the proper scanning parameters.

6.2 The component geometry shall be reviewed to determine coverage and scan distances.

As a minimum the Scan Plan shall identify the scan coordinates that bound the area to be scanned and the transducer head layout with the corresponding transducer offset for each transducer.

6.3 The scan plan shall be reviewed by a data analysis qualified in accordance with paragraph 3.4 to ensure that the requirements of this procedure have been met. No adjustments may be made to the scan parameters after the scan plans have been established without the concurrence of a qualified data analyst.

6.4 Scans will be designated by a Scan Identification Number (SIN) and Subscan Identification to allow the analyst to determine the area examined. The scan identification number and subscan identification shall be identified on the scan plans.

6.5 Scanning shall be performed in a raster pattern in both the axial and circumferential directions. A typical transducer head arrangement used for the examination is shown in Figure 4.

6.6 The following parameters listed in Table E shall be used to establish the scan plan database.

Page 8 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Table E UT ystem Parameters System Transducer Comments Parameter RF Threshold (RG) This is the minimum amplitude that a peak must have to be recorded at RUN gain.

Gain Adjust I EL This value establishes the number of sequential waveforms that will be Coincidence compared point by point before feature extraction algorithms are applied.

Rect. Mode This is the minimum gain normalized amplitude that a peak must have Threshold (CG) to be to be recorded.

This feature permits the insertion of a delay between subsequent pulses if it is determined that the pulse repetition rate is too high. The value is measured in ms. Normally; a value of 0 is used unless Delay evidence of wrap-around is noted In the data. If wrap-around is noted, increase the delay value in .1 ms increments until the signal disappears.

PR Mode Pulse Width Pulser Source Pulser Voltage The pulser voltage for the surface profile scan may be ensure that the Voltage__________________

_________________ surface response Is not saturated.

Gain Boost The systems ability to keep up with recording UT data is a function of several variables and can be controlled by reducing the scan speed.

The data analyst can determine during the analysis of the data file if Scan Speed the scan speed was to fast for the system to record the data of interest that are indicated as intermittent areas of no data along the scan line that is not contributed to coupling effects. If the analyst determines the data is unacceptable due to an excessive scan speed a rescan shall be performed at a slower scan speed.

Index Increment This is the interval at which data is collected along the scan line. The pulse repetition rate is a function of the speed at which the ACCUSONEXm data acquisition system can be configured to take multi-channel data during automatic operation. The pulse repetition Sync. Interval rate is set by the delay and length of the acquire window and the processing time for each A-scan. The pulse repetition rate is not available to the operator as an adjustable control on the system. For the circumferential directed probes, the sync. Interval shall be converted to degrees based on the largest diameter being scanned.

Active Channel Select the channels that are to be active during the scan.

Display Channel Activates the channel to be displayed during acquisition.

Page 9 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-Pa-189-01

7. System Calibration 7.1 The amplifier vertical and amplitude control linearity shall be verified before and after examining all welds required to be examined. Linearity shall be verified using the digitized waveform provided by the data acquisition system.

7.1.1 Vertical Linearity 7.1.1.1 The ability of the amplifier to provide a linear output for 100 percent of the vertical range shall be verified by the following steps:

7.1.1.1.1 Position a search unit so that echoes can be observed from any two reflectors in a material.

7.1.1.1.2 Adjust the search unit position to give a 2-to-1 ratio of the amplitudes between the two echoes with the larger set at 100% full screen height (FSH) and the smaller at 50% FSH.

7.1.1.1.3 Without moving the search unit, reduce the gain in 2 dB increments to decrease the larger echo to at least 20%

FSH and record the amplitude of the smaller echo on the Instrument Control Linearity Sheet.

7.1.1.1.4 The amplitude of the smaller reading must be 50% of the larger reading within +/-5% FSH. The settings and readings must be estimated to the nearest 1%of FSH.

7.1.2 Amplitude Control Linearity 7.1.2.1 The linearity of the amplitude controls of the ultrasonic instrumentation shall be verified using the steps outlined below.

7.1.2.1.1 Position a search unit so that an echo can be observed from a reflector in a material.

7.1.2.1.2 With the increases and decreases in the stepped gain control shown in the following table, the indication must fall within the specified limits below:

Page 10 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Indication set at dB Control Indication limits, %

% of FSH change of full screen 80% -6 dB 32 to 48%

80% -12dB 16 to 24%

40% +6dB 64 to 96%

20% +12dB 64 to 96%

7.2 A static or dynamic calibration shall be established for each transducer utilizing the applicable reference block using the peak amplitude of the reflectors to develop the appropriate sweep range and reference level.

7.3 Transducer exit points shall be measured and documented prior to use using either a rompus or IW block meeting the requirements of paragraph 4.7.1. The refracted angle shall be checked and documented using a side drilled hole that produces the highest amplitude response in order to obtain an accurate and repeatable measurement.

7.4 Prior to calibration the following system parameters that effect the calibrations shall be set for each applicable setup and channel in accordance with Table F.

Table F UT System Parameters System Transducer Comments Parameter _

XDCR Freg. (Filter)

TR Freq.

(Digitization Rate)

Rect (Rectification Mode)

This value establishes the number of sequential Coincidence Mode waveforms that will be compared point by point before feature extraction algorithms are applied 7.5 Calibrations may be performed using different cables between the acquisition system and the transducer as compared to the configuration used for actual scanning. When separate cables are used for the calibrations they shall consist of the same cable type, lengths (+/- 6 feet), and number of intermediate connectors as those used for the examination. When performing the calibrations with different cables then those used for the examination, a comparison of signal responses (time and amplitude) between the calibration and examination cables is required for the complete system (cable, intermediate connectors,, and transducer) for each applicable channel. When required, the cable comparison shall be performed in accordance with the following paragraphs.

Page 11 of 24

FRAMATOME.ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 7.5.1 Upon completion of the system calibrations, a baseline response shall be documented for the complete system (cable, intermediate connectors, remote pulser, ptomo, and transducer) for each applicable channel. This is performed using a rompus block meeting the requirements of paragraph 4.7.1.

7.5.2 The response from the radius of the rompus block shall be maximized and recorded for comparison to the examination cable. The time and amplitude shall be documented by printing the A-scan image of the response that shows the gain level, signal amplitude, and depth/pseconds of the reflector.

7.5.3 When the examination system is configured with the cable configuration to be used for the examination, the response from the rompus block radius shall be captured again with the examination cables in accordance with paragraph 7.5.2.

7.5.4 The response shall be compared to determine if any compensation for amplitude or time is required prior to performing the examination.

7.5.4.1 Any variation in amplitude greater than dB shall be compensated for by adjusting the calibration gain level by the amount determined from the comparison for each channel requiring adjustment.

7.5.4.2 Any variation in time greater than. shall be compensated for by adjusting the position of each calibration point by the amount determined from the comparison for each channel requiring adjustment.

7.6 Time Base Calibration 7.6.1.1 A calibrated time base shall be established for the angle beam transducers using the nominal reflectors from a reference block that meets the material requirements of paragraph 4.7.2. Mark their position and amplitude using the location markers in the calibration window, then adjust the markers to % FSH and save the setup.

7.7 Enter the appropriate calibration information (Transducer ID, manufacture, calibration block, etc.) in the calibration header.

7.8 Calibration Gain (Cal Gain) 7.8.1 The primary reference sensitivity (Cal Gain) for the angle beam transducers will be established using the peak amplitude from a hole reflector located block for each transducer. Adjust the response to % (+1- 5%) FSH. This shall be the level to be used for examinations.

7.9 Scanning sensitivity (run gain) for each inspection angle shall be set.

Page 12 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 7.10 The acquire window (relative to the gate start position) establishes the range of data to be recorded by the data acquisition system.

7.10.1 The acquire window shall start at a depth of and extend to at least" beyond the thickness of the material. The component shall be considered when establishing the required range.

7.11 Calibration Confirmation 7.11.1 Upon completion of the initial system calibrations, the calibration confirmation baseline shall be established. This is performed by copying the initial calibration setup to a setup designated to be used for the calibration checks.

7.11.2 Perform a scan of the reference blocks meeting the requirements of paragraph 4.7.3 with each transducer using the designated calibration setup. The same block shall be used for all subsequent measurements. However, the same block need not be used for each transducer.

7.11.3 Inthe analysis mode, use the beam select feature to capture two reflectors that will be used to measure amplitude and depth responses. Record these values for reference. This baseline response will be used to evaluate future performance of the complete system during the confirmation checks.

7.11.4 Perform all subsequent calibration checks in the same manner and record the amplitude and depth responses.

7.11.5 Intermediate calibration checks shall be performed at approximately, when cable changes are made from the initially calibrated set, or at any point where the analyst suspects malfunction of the system.

7.11.6 A final calibration check shall be performed on the reference block upon completion of examinations.

7.11.7 Signal response during calibration checks or the final calibration must be within

" of the initial sweep reading and dB of the initial amplitude response. If any of the reference points fail to meet these requirements, the following steps shall be completed:

7.11.7.1 All examinations since the last successful calibration shall be evaluated by a qualified analyst to determine the effects of the calibration check results. Rescans shall be issued for any data that is evaluated as deficient.

7.11.7.2 Correct the calibration for future data collection.

Page 13 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-1 89-01

8. Scanning Requirements 8.1 The temperature of the component to be examined shall not exceed 1200 F.

8.2 The scanner shall be calibrated to provide accurate positional information in relationship to the component. This will be accomplished by using the applicable operating instruction (01) for the scanner being used for the examination.

8.3 The system operator shall select the appropriate scan plan to be executed from the previously entered database.

9. Data Analysis 9.1 Refer to Figure 5 during data analysis for a flow chart of the analysis process 9.2 Weld fabrication and examination data histories, if available, shall be reviewed prior to analysis of the ultrasonic examination data.

9.3 Following the completion of scanning, the ultrasonic data shall be reviewed to assure that the data quality (contact, signal to noise, coupling, etc.) is adequate to properly perform an effective evaluation of the examination data. The data shall also be reviewed to verify that the scanning parameters specified in Sections 6 and 7 were utilized and sufficient. If any of the scan parameters require adjustment, the scan plan shall be revised and rescans performed as necessary. All subsequent scanning shall be made using the revised parameters.

9.4 The analyst shall update and apply the geometry file by inputting the beam angle, beam direction, transducer offsets, and component geometry as applicable, (refer to the scan plan) for each scan to assure that the proper location of indications are reported.

9.4.1 Curvature correction shall be applied to adjust the data to the proper depth and circumferential position when using flat calibration blocks.

9.4.2 The transducer beam orientation is used to set the transducer beam direction with respect to the index coordinates for the specific channel. The range of this parameter is 0 to 360 degrees. The +X orientation is 0 degrees and means that the transducer beam direction is in the positive index direction. Likewise, the -X orientation is 180 degrees and is the negative index direction. The analyst can verify that the correct beam direction orientation has been entered by verifying that the proper target motion is display on the screen based on the scan plan information.

9.5 The recorded data shall be analyzed to the extent that the analyst can determine the classification and location of the indications that meet the data recording criteria.

Page 14 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Indications are defined as coherent patterns of signals observed in the B, C, or D-scan images that exhibit target motion in the beam direction. The following steps should be followed in the initial evaluation process of the ultrasonic data to aid determining the origin of the recorded reflectors.

9.5.1 Recall the data for the channel being analyzed. Using the "expand" feature, display the weld volume from a point at least" before the component OD surface to - past the OD surface.

9.5.2 Adjust the color palette range to provide resolution of the various reflectors throughout the scan. Several palette ranges should be evaluated in order to provide optimum image contrast. Too small of a color range may mask flaw indications with the background noise of the component, while too large of a palette range may not properly display low amplitude indications.

9.5.3 Investigate areas of suspect indications in accordance with paragraphs 9.7 and 9.8. At this point the data that projects into the examination volume should be investigated to view the full target motion of the suspected surface connected flaws. For weld configurations that produce geometric responses due to the inside surface the data shall be evaluated with beam angle correction applied and removed to properly evaluate potential flaw indications that may be obscured by the geometric responses. This allows the analyst to identify indications that have target motion, which may have been obscured in the angle corrected views.

9.6 Indications shall be classified as either geometric or non-geometric (flaw indications).

The following paragraphs provide some general guidelines when evaluating examination data with suspected geometric indications.

9.7 Geometric indications are likely to be detected from weld counterbores and weld roots when the beam is directed toward the reflector. This type of indication will normally exhibit a fairly continuous pattern in the D-scan and C-scan images and may be localized in areas or extend a full 3600 around the weld. Geometric indications usually exhibit consistent target motion across the length of the indication. For the examinations being performed in accordance with this procedure from the inside surface, geometric indications are usually detected for shop weld configurations from weld root or counterbore conditions. Care should be taken when analyzing data near geometric indications as they may obscure flaw signals.

9.8 Indications that cannot be dispositioned as geometric indications and meet the applicable criteria specified below shall be classified as flaw indications.

9.8.1 Flaw indications usually exhibit themselves as localized areas and peak amplitudes greater than.

Page 15 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 9.8.2 The intent of this procedure is to detect outside surface connected cracks, however the techniques utilized may also detect other types of flaws which have length and depth (lack of fusion, slag) that have to be evaluated by the analyst.

9.8.3 Cracks are surface connected and may appear as isolated indications or multiple related indications within the examination region. When a flaw indication is embedded in a high amplitude surface geometric response the target motion of the flaw response will normally extend through the geometric response.

9.8.3.1 The position of the flaw in relationship to the transducer position, geometric configuration restrictions, flaw orientation (tilt and skew) and position (side of the weld) will affect the flaw response, i.e. a surface flaw may not provide target motion to the surface if the geometry restricts transducer contact over the flaw or the flaw orientation is not favorable to the side of the weld where the transducer is positioned, etc.

Questionable indications shall be evaluated from both sides of the weld to ensure proper interpretation of the data.

9.8.4 Non-geometric indications that connect to the outside surface shall be considered planar type flaws. Indications that produce images, which display target motion that extends to or beyond the outside surface, (when viewing the B and D scan displays), shall be considered surface connected indications.

10. Data Recording 10.1 The reflector position, depth, and amplitude at the point of maximum amplitude shall be documented for geometrical or fabrication type indications 50% or greater than the primary reference level. These shall be identified as geometric or fabrication indications on the data sheet. These types of indications are recorded for reference only when comparing past and future examination results.

10.2 Surface connected flaw indications shall be reported regardless of amplitude. Data from other scan directions and/or transducers should be used to confirm the presence of flaw indications where possible.

10.3 The location, amplitude, and length shall be documented for each flaw indication as described in the following paragraphs:

10.3.1 The location of the flaw along the pipe axis (for circumferential flaws) or around the circumference (for axial flaws) shall be recorded. The surface position shall be measured at the point where the target motion intersects the outside surface of the component. Where the target motion of a surface connected flaw does not extend to the outside surface due to flaw position relative to the Page 16 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 geometry, extend the target motion following the same angle until it intersects the outside surface to determine the flaw position.

10.3.2 Record the maximum amplitude of the indication. For many flaw indications the flaw response may be saturated. If the flaw response is saturated, record the maximum measured amplitude and also indicate that the flaw response is saturated.

10.3.3 Length:

10.3.3.1 For determining the flaw end points the B-scan should be expanded to display the outer 1.0" of material to properly provide the surface position of the indication. Length measurements should be taken at the end points along the flaw axis where the flaw image.

10.3.3.2 For length sizing of circumferentially oriented flaws the measurements shall normally be taken from the flaw orientation or surface geometry condition provides a better response.

10.4 Areas of limited examination coverage shall be recorded in the examination report. Limitation of coverage of the examination volume from the inside surface of the component is usually due to surface geometry that does not allow the transducer to be scanned over the surface or maintain contact. These regions can be identified using the B, C, and D-scan images. To determine the amount of limited coverage measure the areas of transducer liftoff on the image. Both the axial and circumferential extents shall be documented for each transducer and beam direction. The surface profile scan may be performed if more detailed evaluation of the surface condition is required to provide a more precise estimate of limited coverage.

11. Rescans/Supplemental Scans 11.1 The analyst may identify additional scans in order to satisfy the requirements of this procedure or to re-perform scans of areas that are considered inadequate.

11.2 Supplemental examinations, performed in addition to the examinations required by procedure, are acceptable to provide additional information to help resolve or confirm results, provided they are not used to overturn results obtained with the qualified techniques or provide additional coverage of limited areas.

11.3 Data analysis personnel shall be responsible for initiating all instruction for Rescans or Supplemental scans.

Page 17 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-lSI-189-00 54-PQ-1 89-01

12. Reporting 12.1 The results of the examination shall be reported to the customer. All indications shall be individually processed and evaluated by a qualified analyst. Any area where limited or no examination was performed shall be documented and reported to the customer. A copy of the examination data shall be provided to the customer. As a minimum the following information shall be included; 12.1.1 Scan plan 12.1.2 Calibration records 12.1.3 Date and time of calibration, calibration checks, and examination 12.1.4 Names of and certification levels of examination personnel 12.1.5 Examination procedure number and revision 12.1.6 Calibration block identification 12.1.7 ACCUSONEXTm data acquisition system identification number 12.1.8 Transducer frequency, size, angle, mode, and serial number 12.1.9 Cable type, length, and number of intermediate connectors 12.1.10 Calibration reflector amplitude and depth values 12.1.11 Acquisition and analysis software versions 12.1.12 Couplant 12.1.13 Weld identification 12.1.14 Examination surface 12.1.15 Beam orientation in relationship to the pipe Page 18 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Figure 1 Typical Qualified Cable Configuration Page 19 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54.PQ-189-01 Figure 2 - Typical Calibration Standard Page 20 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Examination Volume for Dissimilar Metal Welds A-B-C-D Figure 3 - Examination Volume Page 21 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-ISI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Figure 4 Typical Transducer Head Arrangement Page 22 of 24

FRAMATOME-ANP NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE Procedure ID Automated Ultrasonic Examination of Welds for Detection of OD Initiated Flaws 54-lSI-189-00 54-PQ-189-01 Figure 5 - Data Analysis Flow Chart Page 23 of 24

LIC-03-0154 Attachment G Page 1 Attachment G Commitment Summary Commitment Action:

To implement the requirements consistent with ASME Code Case N-615, "Ultrasonic Examination as a Surface Examination Method for Category B-F and B-J Piping Welds" for the surface examinations for the six (6) Reactor Pressure Vessel nozzle-to-safe end dissimilar metal welds, category B-F, item B5.10 for nozzle inspections performed during the 2003 refueling outage.