ML12340A254

OPPD 180-day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident. Part 2 of 3

ML12340A254
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	11/27/2012
From:	Omaha Public Power District
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LIC-12-0169 EA 12-021, Rev. 0
Download: ML12340A254 (311)

Text

LIC-12-0169 Enclosure 2 Page 1 Regulatory Commitments Table Commitment Due Date OPPD will complete a walkdown of the eight April 1, 20 items deferred due to inaccessibility.

OPPD will provide an updated seismic July 1, 201 walkdown report.

LIC-1 2-0169 Enclosure 3 Page 1 Status of Condition Reports Listed in Attachment 11.4 of EA12-021 Operability Resolution Status CR Status Condition Report Determination as of 11123112 as of 11/23/12 CR 2012-10195 Operable Resolved Closed CR 2012-10198 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-10367 Operable Resolution Proposed Open CR 2012-10368 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-10369 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-10423 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-10425 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-10427 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-10553 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-10628 Operable Resolved Closed CR 2012-10629 Operable Resolved Closed CR 2012-10630 Operable Resolved Closed CR 2012-10631 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-10672 Operable Resolved Closed CR 2012-10676 Operable Resolution Proposed Open CR 2012-10684 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-10915 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-10916 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-10917 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-10919 Operable Resolution Proposed Open CR 2012-11039 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-11041 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-11277 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-11879 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-11880 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-11973 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-12399 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-12400 Operable Resolution Proposed Open CR 2012-12401 Operable Resolution Proposed Open CR 2012-12402 Operable Resolution Undetermined Open CR 2012-12403 Operable Resolution Proposed Open CR 2012-12404 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure CR 2012-12405 Operable Resolved Awaiting Closure LIC-12-0169 Enclosure 1 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic For Fort Calhoun Station (688 Pages)

ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021 REVISION 0 PAGE I OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR STATION SEISMIC WALKDOWN SUBMITTAL REPORT for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Engineering Report Type: New [ Revision Li EC No. N/A Cancelled El Superseded

[I Superseded By:_Quality-Related:

M Yes rII No Tom Panavotidi (ENERCON) 4--Prepared by: Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Approved by: Approved by: (Print Name/Sign)

Kevin Bessell (ENERCON) 'Other (Print Name/Sign)

• Ashwin Patel 5V Peer jew T er (P int Name/Sign)

J K Gasper .= I z i ,J,-4 .,A Date: 11/26/2012 Date: 11/26/2012 Date: 1] 4z7/Date: i &ý, 2_Date: __A 12_Mangagy (Print FIg) V Jan Bostelman e IN-, r fT~ir(PrintT~lame/Sign) 0.-E'N ER Co N ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 i!H ~N E,' .... EEC.N, REVISION 0 PAGE 2 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Paqe LIST OF TABLES 3 1.0 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE 4 2.0 SEISMIC LICENSING BASIS

SUMMARY

7 2.1 SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE 7 2.2 DESIGN CODES, STANDARDS, AND METHODS 10 3.0 SEISMIC WALK-DOWN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION APPROACH 12 4.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS 14 4.1 SEISMIC WALK-DOWN TEAM 14 4.2 PEER REVIEW TEAM 19 5.0 IPEEE VULNERABILITIES REPORTING 20 6.0 SEISMIC WALK-DOWN EQUIPMENT LIST DEVELOPMENT 23 6.1 SAMPLE OF REQUIRED ITEMS FOR THE FIVE SAFETY FUNCTIONS 24 6.2 SPENT FUEL POOL (SFP) ITEMS 26 6.3 DEFERRED ITEMS 28 7.0 SEISMIC WALK-DOWNS AND AREA WALK-BYS 30 8.0 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION 32 8.1 LICENSING BASIS EVALUATIONS 32 8.2 CORRECTIVE ACTON PROGRAM ENTRIES 33 8.3 PLANT CHANGES 33 9.0 PEER REVIEW 35 9.1 PEER REVIEW PROCESS 35 9.2 PEER REVIEW RESULTS

SUMMARY

37

10.0 REFERENCES

39 11.0 ATTACHMENTS 42

-1 0 EENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021 SExIceflce-&e p~qCt Eid J REVISION 0 PAGE 3 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendationi

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 Figure 2 9 22 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 -Personnel Function Table 2 -Deferred Items Table 3 -Summary of Peer Reviewed Checklists 14 28 m_38 ENERCONENGINEERING REPORT No. EAI 2-021 prqeIec-vrp'ctEwmydq

~ RVSO PAGE 4 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 1.0 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVE This report documents the results of the seismic walkdown effort at the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station, for resolution of the Fukushima Near Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 2.3: Seismic.The objective of the walkdown effort is to provide response to the Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 50.54(f) letter (10 CFR 50.54(f))

issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on March 12, 2012 (Reference

[10.1]). US nuclear power plants are "required to perform seismic walkdowns to identify and address degraded, non-conforming or unanalyzed conditions and to verify the current plant configuration with respect to the current seismic licensing basis". The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), through the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), prepared industry guidance to assist licensees in responding to this NRC request. During the walkdowns, a sample of components and areas of the plant are examined to identify potentially adverse seismic conditions, within the guidelines and parameters provided in the EPRI report 1025286 "Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic", dated June 2012 (Reference

[10.2]) and endorsed by the NRC on May 31, 2012. This report will be referred to as the "EPRI Guidance" for the remainder of this document.

Omaha Public Power District (OPPD)Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station (FCNS) has committed to using this NRC endorsed guidance as the basis for the walkdowns and this report.The sample of components selected for walkdown inspection must be suitably diverse, be located in a variety of environments, include items needed to safely shutdown the reactor, maintain containment integrity, and avoid unanticipated rapid drain-down of the spent fuel pool. The walkdowns primarily focus on equipment anchorage, seismic spatial interaction, seismically induced fire and seismically induced flood.0 I" I ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021________, _ J &elne~b.-E, td J REVISION 0 PAGE 5 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Section 6.0 describes the equipment and component selection process. The selected sample of components constitutes the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL). In addition to seismic equipment/component walkdowns (SWD), "area walk-bys" were performed to ensure that there were no other potentially adverse seismic conditions in an approximate 35 foot radius surrounding each component on the SWEL. The seismic walkdown teams consisted of two seismic walkdown engineers (SWE). In cases where multiple SWEL items were located in the same room/area of the plant, a single area walk-by was conducted for those items.The results of the seismic walkdowns and walk-bys are documented on the Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWC) and Area Walk-by Checklists (AWC). Any potentially adverse seismic conditions discovered during the walkdowns and identified on the SWC's or AWC's, that could not readily be shown to meet the Current Licensing Basis (CLB), were entered into the plant's Corrective Action Program (CAP) for documentation, evaluation and resolution.

Description of the walkdown process is provided in more detail in Section 7.0; results are provided in Attachments 11.2, 11.3, 11.4.Licensing Basis Evaluations (LBEs) were performed as part of the resolution of the Condition Reports (CR) that were initiated to document potentially adverse seismic conditions.

The LBE process is described in more detail in Section 8.0; results of the evaluations are summarized in Attachment 11.4.A Peer Review team was formed to review all aspects of the effort, including the development of the SWEL, the consideration of vulnerabilities identified in the 1990's under the Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) program, the performance of SWEs during walkdowns and area walk-bys, the Licensing Basis Evaluation process, and this Submittal Report. The Peer Review process is described in more detail in Section 9.0; results are included in Attachments 11.6 and 11.7.

0 EN.RCONENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 REVISION 0 PAGE 6 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown In accordance with the EPRI Guidance, the following topics are addressed in the subsequent sections of this report:* Seismic Licensing Basis Summary* Personnel Qualifications

• Selection of Systems, Structures and Components (SSCs)* Seismic Walkdowns and Area Walk-bys* Licensing Basis Evaluations

• IPEEE Vulnerabilities Resolution Report" Peer Review

_..RCON-=

ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021 UPPU 0 E.,.ERC.ON 9e F fy.

REVISION 0O ZAZ E OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 2.0 SEISMIC LICENSING BASIS

SUMMARY

2.1 SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE The Fort Calhoun Station is a pressurized water reactor (PWR) located on the west bank of the Missouri river, approximately 19.4 miles north of Omaha, Nebraska.

The plant site is underlain by 65 to 75 feet of unconsolidated alluvial and glacial deposits, largely loose to moderately compact silty sand, and denser sands and gravels resting on sedimentary rock. The plant buildings are supported by a system of pipe piles driven to bedrock. The soil around the piles under Seismic Category I structures was compacted by vibroflotation to prevent liquefaction under Maximum Hypothetical Earthquake (Safe Shutdown Earthquake) loading.The foundation mat for the Containment and Auxiliary buildings is an integral unit supported on piles. The Intake Structure and Turbine Building are on separate foundations, each supported on piles. The plant grade elevation is 1004 feet.The primary sources of the plant's seismic licensing basis information are the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR), Appendix F (Reference

[10.3]), and the Plant Level Design Basis Document (PLDBD), PLDBD-CS-51 (Reference

[10.4]). The USAR describes the Design Earthquake (DE), also referred to as Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE), and the Maximum Hypothetical Earthquake (MHE), also referred to as Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) and Design Basis Earthquake (DBE).FCNS was licensed in accordance with the draft criteria set forth in the 70 General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Construction, published for comment in the Federal Register (32 FR 10213) on July 11,1967.The Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) for the site is 0.17g acting in the horizontal direction and two-thirds of 0.17g acting in the vertical direction simultaneously, in combination with the primary steady state stresses.

Total stresses are limited so that S0 ENER CO N EPORT NO. EAI 2-021 I .cedence~wipEd REVISION 0 PAGE 8 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown the function of Class 1 SSC's is not impaired in a manner that would prevent a safe and orderly shutdown of the plant.The ground response spectrum of the SSE (MHE) is shown in Figure 1. The spectrum conforms to the average spectra developed by Housner-(Reference

[10.11]) for frequencies higher than about 0.33 Hz. The spectra for frequencies lower than about 0.33 Hz were prepared utilizing data presented by Newmark (Reference

[10.12]).The damping factors (percent of critical) that were used in the design of SSC's range from 0.5% for vital piping systems to 7% for framed concrete structures.

Damping ratio for bolted steel assemblies and for concrete structures supporting the reactor vessel or steam generator was 2%.

1 0 ENERCON ~~I__ENGINEERING REPORT No. EAI 2-021% J WxceIn-EqtWwiyd~

J REVISION 0 PAGE 9 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown2;Figure 1 ENERCONENGINEERING REPORT No. EAI 2-021'&celmce.wepjrctEYvyd0!

REVISION 0 PAGE 10 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 2.2 DESIGN CODES, STANDARDS, AND METHODS All Class I systems, structures and components (SSC's) at FCS have been designed to withstand stresses resulting from the response to the Design Earthquake (ground acceleration of 0.08g horizontal and two-thirds of 0.08g vertical, acting simultaneously), in combination with the primary steady-state stresses.

Total stresses are maintained within the allowable working stress limits accepted as good practice and, where applicable, set forth in the appropriate design standards, such as the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, USAS B31.1 (1967), USAS B31.1 (1955) for Reactor Coolant loop piping, and B31.7 (1968) Codes for Pressure Piping, ACI 318-63 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete, and AISC Specification for the Design and Erection of Structural Steel for Buildings.

In addition, Class I SSC's have been designed such that seismic stresses resulting from the response to the Maximum Hypothetical Earthquake (ground acceleration of 0.17g horizontal and two-thirds of 0.17g vertical, acting simultaneously), in combination with the primary steady-state stresses, are limited so that the function of the SSC's is not impaired in a manner that would disrupt the safe and orderly shutdown of the plant. Seismic qualification of Class I electrical equipment conforms to IEEE 344-1975.

Components of the Reactor Protective System and the Engineered Safeguards Actuation System are qualified per IEEE 344-1971"Guide for Seismic Qualification of Class 1 E Electrical Equipment for Nuclear Power Generation Stations".

The general Method of analysis for Class 1 SSC's can be described as follows: " Determine the natural frequency of vibration of the structure or component* Select the appropriate Amplified Floor Response Spectrum (ARS, currently called In-Structure-Response-Spectrum, or ISRS) or Ground Spectrum, depending on support elevation and/or location

_ 1.. 0 N I__ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 f&e'p, -4v 4 ftewqd REVISION 0 PAGE 11 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown* Select the appropriate damping ratio of component and, from the corresponding spectral curve and at the natural frequency of vibration of the component, read the response acceleration of the component* Stresses resulting from the combination of Design Earthquake acceleration and other applicable loads are checked against limits imposed by design standards* Responses resulting from the combination of Maximum Hypothetical Earthquake acceleration and other applicable loads are checked to ensure that stresses would not produce rupture and deflections would not prevent the functional performance of the component

_ 0 ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021REVISION 0 PAGE 12 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 3.0 Seismic Walk-down Program Implementation Approach OPPD has committed to conduct and document seismic walkdowns for resolution of NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, in accordance with the EPRI Guidance.

OPPD contracted with ENERCON Services, Inc., for supplementary engineering and management resources.

A team of individuals, Mr. Marvin Morris and Mr. Steve Skubey, equipped with knowledge of plant systems and components, were selected to develop the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL). Two SWELs were developed:

SWEL 1 and SWEL 2.SWEL 1 consists of a sample of equipment related to safe shutdown of the reactor and maintaining containment integrity; SWEL 2 consists of items related to the Spent Fuel Pool, as described in the EPRI Guidance.Personnel responsible for performing the walkdowns and AWCs successfully completed training for the NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. The Seismic Walkdown Engineers who are certified bySQUG were not required to complete the NTTF training, but were trained on the differences between the USI A-46 and NTTF 2.3: Seismic programs.

The team of Seismic Walkdown Engineers (SWEs) who performed the walkdowns were Mr.Kevin Bessell, Mr. Alex Smerch, and Mr. John Kao. The majority of the walkdowns were performed by Mr. Smerch and Mr. Kao. Mr. Bessell took over the role left vacant by Mr. Kao to complete the remaining walkdowns with Mr. Smerch. Mr. Bessell and Mr.Kao have extensive experience in seismic design and qualification of nuclear power plant SSC's. It was considered important to the project to ensure that any given walkdown team would be comprised with an experienced seismic engineer and one less experienced engineer.

Qualifications of the seismic walkdown team members are provided in Section 4.0.0 ENERCON ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021 y.ence-e-EwyPr

.REVISION 0 PAGE 13 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWC's) and Area Walk-by Checklists (AWC's) were prepared in advance of the walkdowns.

Packages were assembled into folders that included related information, such as location of equipment, anchorage drawings, in-structure response spectra information, calculations, and previously performed qualifications under earlier programs (refer to Section 5.0), if available.

Walkdowns were performed for all accessible components on the combined SWEL (SWEL 1 + SWEL 2). During the walkdowns, SWC's were completed for each component on the SWEL, and AWC's were completed for each area within an approximate 35 foot radius of the component.

Walkdowns were tracked by component number and AWC's by location.

Details of the SWC's and AWC's are provided in Section 7.0.The SWCs and AWCs were given one of three status marks "Y" for Yes (walkdown is completed), "N" for No (walkdown has not been performed), or "U" for Uncertain (walkdown has been performed however more information is required and item has been deferred).

When feasible, inaccessible items were replaced by alternate, accessible items, and the SWEL was revised accordingly.

Such changes were reviewed by the SWEs, Equipment Selection Personnel and the Peer Review team.Potentially adverse seismic conditions that were identified in the walkdowns were either evaluated under a Licensing Basis Evaluation or entered directly into the plant's corrective action program (CAP) for further evaluation.

A summary of the potentially adverse seismic conditions is provided in Attachment 11.4.A Peer Review was conducted for each activity, including this submittal report. The Peer review activity is described in detail in Section 9.0. Qualifications of the Peer Review team are provided in Section 4.0.

__I ENE C ENGINEERING REPORT No. EAI 2-021--I'ExcelIence-wyprboEct vwydoy REVISION 0 PAGE 14 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 4.0 Personnel Qualifications Qualifications and experiences of personnel participating in the NTTF Seismic Walkdown effort are provided in this section. Training certificates for the SWEs are provided in Attachment 11.8.Name of Equipment Plant Seismic Licensing IPEEE Peer Personnel Selection Operations Walkdown Basis Reviewer Reviewer Marvin X X Morris Steve X Skubey Kevin X X (LBE)Bessell Alex X Smerch John Kao X Don Pier X X (SWEL)Ashwin X X (SWD, Patel SWEL)Ryan X Rymarczyk David X X (SWD)Haas Russell X Placke Table 1 -Personnel Function 4.1 SEISMIC WALK-DOWN TEAM 0 Marvin Morris B.S. Mathematics, University of Texas, Pan American, 1968 ENGINEERING; REPORT No. EAI 2-021 ,~EAE RCON , ef~ncepwj'ct~qdoe REVISION 0 PAGE 15 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown M.S. Physics, Sam Houston State University, 1974 Mr. Marvin Morris is the Supervisor of Safety Analysis in ENERCON's NYSIS Division.

Mr. Morris has over 30 years of experience in the nuclear industry in areas of design, analysis, licensing and operations support. His more recent experience has been involved with the development of Combined License (COL) applications for Bellefonte, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, William States Lee and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant new plant projects." John Kao, S.E., P.E.B. S. Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1976 M. S. Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1977 MBA Illinois State University, 2003 Mr. John Kao is a Civil/Structural Engineer, sub-contracted by ENERCON, with over 34 years of work experience, the majority of which has been in nuclear.John has expertise in diverse areas of structural analysis and design, as well as some areas of civil engineering.

Over the past 9 years at a utility company, Mr.Kao has served as a manager for small transmission and substation projects as well as performed the engineering for these projects.

John has been the lead structural engineer for a leading consulting firm in the power industry and was responsible for the analysis and design of structural steel structures, pipe supports, writing design criteria and coordinating field work. Mr. Kao is an EPRI trained SQUG Seismic Capability Engineer.

He is a licensed structural engineer and professional engineer in the state of Illinois.* Kevin Bessell, S.E., P.E.B. S. Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2000 Mr. Kevin Bessell is the Lead Civil/Structural Engineer in ENERCON's Naperville, Illinois office. He has over 12 years of experience, of which 4 years

_ 0 EERCONENGINEERING REPORT No. EAI 2-021 Evewydo REVISION 0 PAGE 16 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown are in the nuclear industry.

Mr. Bessell recently completed the seismic analysis of the Fuel Handling Building at Zion Nuclear Power Station in support of the upgrade of the overhead bridge crane. In addition, he provided oversight for the cask set down safe load path evaluations and stack-up seismic restraint design. Mr. Bessell has experience in linear time history and response spectrum dynamic analyses as well as equivalent static method analysis of decoupled subsystems.

Mr. Bessell is an EPRI trained Fukushima NTTF Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Engineer and has trained over 30 individuals.

He is a licensed structural engineer in the state of Illinois and a licensed professional engineer in the state of Illinois and Wisconsin.

• Alex Smerch B.S. Civil Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, 2008 Mr. Alex Smerch is a Civil/Structural Engineer in ENERCON's Naperville, Illinois office and is the lead Seismic Walkdown engineer for the project. He has over 3 years of experience performing structural analysis and design in the power and industrial industries.

His experience includes developing and analyzing finite element models using a variety of software to aid the design of numerous structural components and systems. He is experienced in preparing design calculations and analysis of concrete and steel structures, conducting dynamic analyses of structures to resist seismic and hydrodynamic loads, designing various structural support systems to comply with regulations and restrictions at nuclear facilities, and performing computer programming to post-process and expedite the analysis results from software based design aids. Mr.Smerch is an EPRI trained Fukushima NTTF Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Engineer and has trained over 15 individuals.

• Steve Skubey B.S. Civil Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN N ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021_E ENE cON REVISION 0 PAGE 17 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Mr. Steve Skubey is a Civil/Structural Engineer in ENERCON's Overland Park, Kansas office. He has over 4 years of experience in the nuclear industry.

He has been involved with the TVA Watts Bar Nuclear Unit 2 completion as an employee with Bechtel Power Corporation.

His primary role was a pipe support design engineer performing design analyses, material testing and hazard evaluations.

Ryan Rymarczyk B.S., Nuclear Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 2007 Mr. Ryan Rymarczyk is a Nuclear Engineer in ENERCON's Naperville, Illinois office. In this position, he has performed various mechanical analyses and design for commercial nuclear power plants including River Bend, Perry, Point Beach, St. Lucie and Palisades Nuclear Stations.

Mr. Rymarczyk was also involved in developing an economic feasibility study for a next-generation mid-western nuclear power station." David Haas B.S. Engineering Technology, University of Nebraska, 1977 Mr. David Haas has over 33 years of experience as; a former senior mechanical design engineer in the Design Engineering Group at OPPD; 22 years of nuclear experience at Fort Calhoun Station; performed walkdowns for concrete anchor inspection and anchor pull-testing for the NRC I&E Bulletin 79-02 in the late 70's and early 80's; also performed pipe support walkdowns for related I&E Bulletin 79-14; wrote specifications, installation and repair procedures, performed ASME code reconciliations, qualified various welding procedures and served as alternate welding engineer.* Ashwin Patel ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021 E -N ERC"ON REVISION 0 PAGE 18 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown B. S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho B. S. Electrical Engineering, University of Idaho Mr. Patel is a senior engineer at OPPD. He has performed stress analyses and equipment qualifications of various power plant components based on SQUG methodology at General Electric, Union Carbide (Reprocessing Nuclear Fuel)and TVA; performed testing of equipment, seismic test reports, prepared modifications, evaluated relays and quality relays at OPPD. He holds the following certifications:

SQUG Walkdown Engineer; SQUG NARE; SQUG Relay Evaluation.

• Don Pier B.S., Thomas Edison State University Mr. Pier is a licensed Senior Reactor Operator at Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station.He has been the project manager for the Steam Generator Replacement and Extended Power Uprate. He holds the following qualifications:

Shift Manager;Control Room Supervisor; Shift Technical Advisor; Reactor Operator; Test Engineer.* Russ Placke, P.E.B. S. Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1995 Mr. Placke has over 17 years of experience as a Civil/Structural Design engineer.

Much of this experience has been in the power and industrial field in the design of steel and concrete structures such as buildings, pipe racks, pipe supports, building foundations and equipment foundations.

A portion of this experience has been as a field engineer for the construction of (3) combined cycle power plants where he was responsible for the resolution of structural issues encountered during the construction.

The past two years have been as a design engineer -nuclear at OPPD's Fort Calhoun Power Station where he ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021 O~E NERCON q REVISION 0 PAGE 19 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown has been extensively involved in the plant recovery efforts such as the reconstitution of the containment internal structure design calculations.

Mr.Placke has also completed OPPD's one year training program for design engineers and also the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) training.4.2 PEER REVIEW TEAM" Kevin Bessell (ENERCON)" Don Pier (OPPD)* Ashwin Patel (OPPD Lead Peer Reviewer)* David Haas (OPPD)

ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 E-N'E:R CO MgD DUO 'Excetence-Eqp(ojectEwq/do REVISION 0 PAGE 20 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 5.0 IPEEE Vulnerabilities Reporting During the IPEEE program in response to NRC Generic Letter 88-20 (Reference

[10.5]), plant-specific seismic vulnerabilities were identified at many plants. In this context,"vulnerabilities" refers to conditions found during the IPEEE program related to seismic anomalies, outliers, or other findings.IPEEE Reviewers (see Section 4.0) reviewed the IPEEE Report (Reference

[10.25])and supporting documentation to identify items determined to present a seismic vulnerability by the IPEEE program. IPEEE Reviewers then reviewed additional plant documentation to identify the eventual resolutions to those seismic vulnerabilities not resolved by the completion of the IPEEE program.During the 1980's, the NRC initiated an Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 under Generic Letter No. 87-02 (Reference

[10.6]), to review the seismic adequacy of equipment in certain operating nuclear power plants with respect to seismic criteria not in use at the time when these plants were licensed.

FCNS was identified as one of the A-46 plants which must be reviewed.

The vulnerabilities that were then identified under the IPEEE program were also incorporated as outliers under the USI A-46 program.OPPD joined the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) which published the Generic Implementation Procedure, Revision 2 (GIP-2) (Reference

[10.17]) for evaluating these plants and equipment.

The NRC accepted the SQUG procedure for resolving USI A-46 in Supplementary Safety Evaluation Report No.2 (SSER No.2)(Reference

[10.18]).

OPPD used GIP-2 in its entirety, including the clarifications, interpretations and exceptions identified in SSER No.2, as clarified by the August 21, 1992 SQUG letter (Reference

[2.19]), to evaluate the seismic adequacy of selected safe shutdown equipment in the Fort Calhoun Station (Reference

[2.20]).

m.0c0N ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA2-021 SEXCENce-RvC REVISION 0 PAGE 21 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown The NRC issued a Safety Evaluation Report to OPPD on July 30, 1998, which accepted the results of the USI A-46 program for FCNS, including the approach used to resolve all outliers and vulnerabilities (Reference

[2.21]).As discussed in the letter in the following figure, there are no IPEEE vulnerabilities to report, because all "outliers" have been resolved and incorporated into the plant design (see Figure 2 below for closeout of USI A-46, TAC No. M69447).

EN ER CON ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EAI201~E N ER .N...&iecr.(.ct

' E dýer REVISION 0 PAGE 22 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown RE.T3 AUG 41i198 ,,% RoeG UNITED STATES NR, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION N~e-* WASNINOTON.

D.C. now owl July 30. 19YB Mr. S. K. Oarnbhir PT I ]R 1 .Q1, ED Division Manager -Engineering

& Operations Support PER 0 CPR 1911. 23,6 or $0.7 Ornala Pub*'ic Powe r Oist'ict IE.. .E Fc', Calhoun Station FC-2-4 Adm. Y Post Office Box 399 ___ .-, Hwy. 15 -Norin of Fort Calhoun ... ..Fc-, Calhoun, Nebraska 68023-0399

SUBJECT:

FORT CALHOUN STATION, UNIT NO. I -CLOSEOUT OF UNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUE A-46 (TAC NO. M69447)Dear Mr. Gambhir."t todf has reviewed Onmaha PL'blic Power DOsbsici's (OPPD) respolIse to Generic Letter (GL), 5T-D;> Pst.ahlished the USI A-46 program for thB Fort Calhoun Station. Unit No. 1. The staff concludes that your Usr A-46 implamentation program ias met the purpose ar.c intent of the oiateria in the Generic Implenmer.tation Procedure, Revision 2 'GIP-2) ard the staff's Supplementa:

Safety Evaluation Raport No. 2 (SSER No. 2) for the resolution of USI A-46. The rj staff has determined that yoir corrective actions and comrleted pihysical modifications for resolution of oullierv uesulted in safety enhancerents, in certain aspects, that are beyond the origi l II cenailn g b~aeis: and as a result, provide sufficien-asis to close the USI A-46 review at s 1 thc facility.

The staNl concludles that y0Jr implern-ntallon program to resolve USI A-46 ai the facility adqL ately addressed the purpose of the 10 CFR 50.64(Cp request. Your activities related to the USI A-46 implementation am subject to NRC inspeetlon.

Sincerely.

L. Raynard Wharton, Project Manager Project Directorate IV-2 Division of Reactuk Prujects -IlI/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regiula !On Docket No. 50-285

Enclosure:

Sa'ely Evluatiion cc wiencls: See next page WVC.atu., D1rucubburger.

SKlo(abihir, RLPhdips, JWChase, MATesar, JMSolymoszy, I4L.Jnr cur~,ki. PJLounmbu:rry.

RE-W(.,.1cott, ,L[:Ilii-.

DRPodm'l. ,liJLucht, JWTiI1s. BRHansher, TClritthews.

flFSpires.

1RKu(hr, DPGaII. itW',rtin.

JGKeppler.

JHUacKin"on.

JTaylur..%,JAnUjuS, TJ1l'rnissno, WiiFLhilmoto, WFConw;y, FILE COPY (Jo.n)Figure 2 ENERC0N ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 a'fkee-&iyrceEy REVISION 0 PAGE 23 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 6.0 Seismic Walk-down Equipment List Development The process used to select the items to be included in the seismic walkdown equipment list (SWEL) is described in detail in the EPRI Guidance, Section 3: Selection of SSCs. In general, the Ft. Calhoun SWEL is comprised of two groups of items, one of which is a sample of components from the USI A-46 safe shutdown equipment list (SSEL), the Ft.Calhoun IPEEE list, insights from the Ft. Calhoun PRA, and review of plant modifications completed since the USI A-46 report was completed (termed SWEL 1)and the other is a sample of components associated with the spent fuel pool (termed SWEL 2).The equipment list used as a starting point for development of the SWEL 1 is the base list, or BL 1. The base list used at FCNS is the Safe Shutdown Equipment List (SSEL)that was developed to address the NRC Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46, "Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants" which employed the guidance provided in Revision 2 of the Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) and NRC Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report No. 2. The SSEL was developed in the 1990's and, to ensure that the safe shutdown paths used as a basis for the list remained valid, a review of the Design Basis Documents (DBDs) for safe shutdown systems was performed to identify changes to the systems since the SSEL was developed.

Any new or changed equipment was added to BL 1.The selection of equipment for the seismic walkdown is based on the USI A-46 Safe Shutdown Equipment List from EA 96-017(Reference

[2.26]) and the IPEEE Component List from the IPEEE Report (Reference

[2.25]). Screening of these lists is based on the requirements provided in the EPRI Guidance.

In accordance with the EPRI Guidance, Seismic Category I structures, containment penetrations, and Seismic Category I piping systems were not included in the SSC bucket from which the SWEL 1 components were selected.

This selection process is intended to comply with the request in the NRC ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 ENE- EC.0N&ce~ece-4rvyprojtEvvrjdq REVISION 0 PAGE 24 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 50.54(f) Letter (Reference

[10.1]), under the "Requested Actions" section, to "verify current plant configuration with the current license basis." 6.1 SAMPLE OF REQUIRED ITEMS FOR THE FIVE SAFETY FUNCTIONS The selection of equipment for the seismic walkdown was based on the five safety functions identified in the EPRI Guidance: 1. Reactor reactivity control 2. Reactor coolant pressure control 3. Reactor coolant inventory control 4. Decay heat removal 5. Containment function The SWEL 1 was developed by applying the following five sample selection attributes, defined in the EPRI Guidance, Section 3, to BL 1. The method of application is summarized below for each attribute:

• A variety of types of systems Sample items are selected to represent a broad range of frontline and support systems included on the SSEL.* Major new and replacement equipment A review of the system DBDs was performed to identify major new or replacement equipment installed within the last 20 years. A sample of these items is included on SWEL 1." A variety of types of equipment At least one item from each of the classes of equipment listed in EPRI Guidance, Appendix B: Classes of Equipment was included in SWEL 1 to ENERCONENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 Ev N_ R CQ' N"__ Ecel REVISION 0 PAGE 25 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown provide a sample selection of a variety of equipment types. No items are specifically listed in the Ft. Calhoun SSEL for Classes 11, 12, and 13. For these three classes no items are included on SWEL 1.* A variety of environments Sample items were selected from different locations in the plant to include various environments (hot, cold, dry, wet) and inside and outside installations.

• Equipment enhanced due to vulnerabilities identified during the IPEEE program The IPEEE program documentation was reviewed to determine equipment that had been modified or otherwise enhanced to reduce IPEEE vulnerabilities.

A sample of these items is included on SWEL 1.An additional consideration for the development of SWEL 1 is the equipment availability for inspection due to protected train restrictions during plant operation.

The SWEL 1 items were selected from a single train (train A, where possible) and the walkdowns were scheduled to be accomplished within a single week to ensure accessibility.

To ensure that risk significant items were included, insights from the Ft. Calhoun Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) were considered.

The Fort Calhoun Station Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) model includes only simplified modeling of a potential seismic initiating event. The simplified seismic model is used to support plant configuration risk assessments.

It is not equivalent to a seismic PRA, and does not meet Regulatory Guide 1.200 (Reference

[2.27]) with respect to modeling of seismic events. The simplified seismic model is based on a hypothetical seismic event (nominally 0.1g) that is assumed to result in failure of selected equipment that is susceptible to failure at or near the assumed g-level. The model assumes that the seismic event results in unrecoverable loss of off-site power, failure of equipment in the Turbine Building (including Auxiliary Feedwater Pump FW-54), failure of the diesel-

" 0 ENER-ON J ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021

REVISION 0 PAGE 26 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown driven fire pump in the Intake Structure and failure of all makeup sources to the Emergency Feedwater Storage Tank (EFWST) except Raw Water.Using the existing PRA model, a list of potential seismic event accident sequences (i.e., cut-sets) was generated.

The list of importance measures for basic events appearing in the seismic event cut-sets were sorted based on the "Risk Achievement Worth, RAW" importance measure. The equipment with the highest importance according to this approach is listed below: " Diesel Generators (including inlet/exhaust dampers and fuel oil transfer pumps)" Station Batteries* Various 4160V Breakers* Air-Operated Auxiliary Feedwater Valves" 480V Buses* Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps FW-10 & FW-6 (including associated equipment)

6.2 SPENT

FUEL POOL (SFP) ITEMS A base list (BL 2) was developed by reviewing the spent fuel pool (SFP) cooling and inventory related systems for all safety-related, Seismic Category I equipment and reviewing the systems whose failure could result in rapid drain-down of the SFP to within 10' above the stored fuel. Rapid drain-down is defined as lowering of the water level to the top of the spent fuel assemblies within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> after an earthquake.

A sample of the Seismic Category I systems components were selected for inspection consistent with the SWEL 1 methods defined previously to create SWEL 2. , The method for selection of SWEL 2 SFP rapid drain-down items described in the EPRI Guidance is difficult to implement.

When rapid drain-down items are identified, it is not clear what actions are required particularly if items are placed on SWEL 2. Rapid drain-I.N.R o ENGINEERINGREPORT NO. EAI 2-021 ME O ceItcrjpE t REVISION 0 PAGE 27 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown down would typically involve piping failure; however, the walkdown guidance does not include piping in the scope. In addition, the rapid drain-down considerations in the EPRI Guidance, such as pool sloshing evaluations, boil-off, leak size, etc., are not sufficiently defined for implementation as part of the walkdown / SWEL development process.SWEL 1 and SWEL 2 items were combined to form the SWEL. Generally speaking, all major components (e.g., tanks, heat exchangers, and pumps) needed for safe shutdown, following a seismic event and accompanied by a loss of offsite power (LOOP), were selected.The SWEL was developed in the form of a spreadsheet, which allowed for manipulation/sorting of data and cross-referencing to build summary tables. The SWEL spreadsheet includes the following information:

1. Sequential item number (used to develop the SWC ID #)2. A-46 Equipment Box (where provided)3. Component ID 4. Equipment Class (from GIP)5. Item Description

6. System Designator

7. Location (Room)8. Floor Elevation 9. Equipment Location 10. Power source (if applicable)

The associated lists from the spreadsheet, BL 1, BL 2, and t.he combined SWEL can be found in Attachment 11.1. It shall be noted that the informat:ion (equipment description, elevation, location, etc.) provided in the base lists (BL1, BL2') is what is provided exactly 1 E:NERCON ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EAI 2-021___ ___

Enyd REVISION 0 PAGE 28 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown on the SSEL. The information provided in the SWEL is based on current information provided in the document management system utilized by Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station, Asset Suite. As such, the information from one list to the other may vary slightly, and has no effect on the implementation of the walkdowns performed at FCNS.6.3 DEFERRED ITEMS Items on the SWEL and their corresponding areas that are inaccessible during the 180-day period for resolution to the 10CFR50.54(f)

Letter are listed in Table 2 below: Table 2 -Deferred Items 0 ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021' ENERCON Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Component FW-6 was determined inaccessible at the time of the inspections due to maintenance being performed on the pump. The other items were part of an energized system and were required to be in a bus outage for appropriate inspection.

OPPD is scheduled to complete walkdowns of these items'by March 31, 2013 and will provide an updated report by June 30, 2013.

ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021 Specf-" poE&relyday REVISION 0 PAGE 30 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 7.0 Seismic Walk-downs and Area Walk-Bys Subsequent to the development of the SWEL, the SWE's prepared walkdown packages which consisted of the SWCs, AWCs, plant documentation showing the anchorage for at least 50% of the items on the SWEL and in-structure response-spectra, if available.

Having obtained assurance from the SWEL development team and the Peer Review team that the SWEL attributes contained in the EPRI Guidance were not compromised, a small number of components that were inaccessible were either removed from the SWEL or replaced by alternate components.

The walkdowns were conducted from August 1 3 th through August 2 9 th and focused on anchorages, seismic spatial interactions, and other potentially adverse seismic conditions, such as bolts in degraded or non-conforming conditions, extensive corrosion, absence of, or, inadequate hardware, cracked concrete, corrosion of weld and/or base metal, etc.In addition to the general inspection requirements, at least 50% of SWEL items with anchorage were required to be verified that their anchorage is consistent with plant documentation.

A total of 96 items were identified on the SWEL for inspection, and 88 walkdowns were performed with 8 items deferred as shown in Table 2 due to inaccessibility as previously discussed.

Of the 96 items on the SWEL, 68 items had anchorage that was not considered in-line. Anchorage configuration verification was performed on 41 items, which is greater than 50% of the items with anchorage not considered in-line. There are 96 SWCs provided in Attachment 11.2. It shall be noted that the information provided on the SWCs relative to equipment identification, location, description and floor elevation was input as provided in the FCNS document management system, Asset Suite.

• u JoE E RC NENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021 prieEveyd_

REVISION 0) PAGE 31 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Area Walk-Bys were performed in conjunction with the walkdowns of each item. All areas/rooms containing equipment on the SWEL were included in the AWCs. Since certain areas contained more than one SWEL item, the number of total area walk-bys conducted is less than the number of seismic walkdowns.

A total of 33 area walk-bys were performed and the associated AWCs are provided in Attachment 11.3. It shall be noted that the floor elevation identified on the AWCs corresponds to the elevation from which the inspections were performed.

In cases where the SWEs identified a potentially adverse seismic condition, the condition was identified on the SWC and/or AWC and a Licensing Basis Evaluation was performed.

In many cases, a condition report (CR) was written to document and resolve the condition.

ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EAI 2-021__

REVISION 0 PAGE 32 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 8.0 Licensing Basis Evaluation

8.1 LICENSING

BASIS EVALUATIONS Potentially adverse seismic conditions identified as part of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program may be evaluated by comparison to the current licensing basis of the plant as it relates to the seismic adequacy of the equipment in question, as is described in Section 5 of the EPRI Guidance.

If the identified condition is consistent with existing seismic documentation associated with that item, then no further action is required.

If the identified condition cannot easily be shown to be consistent with existing seismic documentation, or no seismic documentation exists, then the condition is entered into the CAP.Of the 67 identified potentially adverse seismic conditions, 67 LBEs were performed.

Each LBE performed is documented consistently, and included in Attachment 11.5. The results of these LBEs with respect to the associated potentially adverse seismic conditions are summarized in Attachment 11.4. A total of 20 potentially adverse seismic conditions evaluated using a LBE were dispositioned and require no further action, whereas 13 required CAP entry. The LBEs that were dispositioned were the result of inadequate anchorage configuration documentation at the time of the inspections.

The SWE team documented as-built anchorage information as sketches on the checklists for further verification against plant documents that required more time to retrieve.The following Licensing Basis Evaluations provided below are worth noting. Refer to specific LBEs provided in Attachment 11.5 for more information on the condition.

LB-2 Condition:

Missing clamp attaching unistrut and pipe for FCV-1 369 (SWC-38).

The unistrut holds the instrument line.Evaluation:

CR 2012-10198 was initiated to resolve the condition.

NENGINEERING REPORT No. EAI 2-021 ExceRM I ce I PefljeCtEvevyday REVISION 0 PAGE 33 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown LB-28 Condition:

Block wall lateral restraint is not in contact with block wall and is possibly not restraining block wall in current state. A potential seismic interaction concern with nearby pumps AC-5A and AC-5B.Evaluation:

CR 2012-10915 was initiated to resolve the condition.

8.2 CORRECTIVE

ACTON PROGRAM ENTRIES Conditions identified during the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys that required further resolution were entered into the plant's Corrective Action Program (CAP) for further review and disposition in accordance with the plant's, existing processes and procedures.

Conditions entered into the CAP included three types of unusual conditions identified:

Seismically insignificant unusual conditions" Potentially adverse seismic condition that does not pass a LBE* Potentially adverse seismic condition that bypasses a LBE A total of 33 CRs were written relative to potentially adverse! seismic conditions identified.

The CR numbers, current status, and resolution (where applicable and available) are summarized for these potentially adverse seismic conditions in Attachment 11.4.8.3 PLANT CHANGES There were no immediately implemented plant changes warranted by the results of the NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown program. Resolutions of the CRs for seismically insignificant unusual conditions and potentially adverse seismic conditions identified will determine if future modifications to the plant are required.

While no plant modifications have been identified as a result of the seismic walkdowns and walk-bys, various cases ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EAI 2-021 N, ERCO-0N Eie &ence;n e tppj cthv/dyje REVISION 0 PAGE 34 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown were found where repairs were required or housekeeping issues needed to be addressed.

Current status and resolutions (where applicable and available) for CRs related to potentially adverse seismic conditions are provided in Attachment 11.4.0 0 ENE...N ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021__._ , .&, elt~en p~tEv~riydq REVISION 0 PAGE 35 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 9.0 Peer Review 9.1 PEER REVIEW PROCESS The Peer Review for the NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic walkdowns was performed in accordance with Section 7 of the EPRI Guidance.

The following activities were peer reviewed: " selection of SSC's for the SWEL* sample of the checklists prepared for the seismic walkdowns and area, walk-bys* licensing basis evaluations

• decisions for entering the potentially adverse conditions into the CAP process* submittal report* results of the peer review process in the submittal report The selection of items for the SWEL was peer reviewed in accordance with Section 3 of the EPRI Guidance.

The peer review team members independently provided comments to the personnel who prepared the SWEL. Peer review comments were resolved and incorporated into the final SWEL, ensuring that all recommendations of the EPRI Guidance have been met. The final SWEL contains a diverse sample of equipment required to perform the five safety functions specified in the EPRI Guidance, which are:* Reactor reactivity control* Reactor coolant pressure control* Reactor coolant inventory control* Decay heat removal* Containment integrity

__ ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EAI 2-021 ENERCON MM7 MIr.e.qfctvi.d.

REVISION 0 PAGE 36 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown In addition, the peer review process verified that SWEL items included major new and replacement items,-a variety of environments, equipment enhanced based on findings of the IPEEE (if any), and risk insight considerations.

The peer review team confirmed that the SWE walkdown team performed the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys as described in Section 4 of the EPRI Guidance.

A minimum of 10-25% of the SWCs and AWCs were reviewed for consistency and accuracy.

The majority of the peer reviews occurred at the start of the walkdowns, and the reviewers were able to provide comments at the early stages of the process. This helped to ensure consistency and confirm that walkdowns were being performed in accordance with all the requirements of the EPRI Guidance.All potentially adverse seismic conditions were entered into the plant's CAP program for further review and disposition.

The review team verified the decisions for identifying such conditions as sound, and the dispositions were conducted in accordance with the plant's current license basis (CLB).A peer review was completed of the licensing basis evaluations provided in Attachment 11.5. Within these licensing basis evaluations, CRs were generated for maintenance issues to replace missing bolts, nuts or remove items for housekeeping issues, or to provide further, detailed resolution of the potentially adverse seismic condition.

The remaining licensing basis evaluations were created to document potentially adverse seismic conditions that were immediately entered into the CAP for detailed evaluation and investigation.

The peer review of these LBEs ensured that all the information provided from the walkdown team to the licensing basis evaluation team member provided enough detail for accurate and timely resolution.

The peer review team was provided with an early draft of this submittal report for peer review. The peer review team verified that the submittal report met the objectives and requirements of Enclosure 3 to the 50.54(f) Letter, and documented the NTTF 2.3 I E-NE RCON ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021

0) PAGE 37 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Seismic Walkdown program performed in accordance with the EPRI Guidance.

The peer review team provided the results of review activities to the SWE team for consideration.

The SWE team satisfactorily addressed all peer review comments in the final version of the submittal report. The signature of the Peer Review Team Leader provides documentation that all elements of the peer review as described in Section 6 of the EPRI Guidance were completed.

9.2 PEER REVIEW RESULTS

SUMMARY

Peer Review of the seismic walkdowns and area walk-bys were conducted by Ashwin Patel and David Haas, who have extensive experience in seismic engineering as applied to nuclear power plants. The peer review team reviewed the walkdown packages (checklists, photos, drawings etc.) and ensured that the SWCs and AWCs were completed in accordance with the EPRI Guidance.

The checklists were selected at random and 25 out of 96 SWC forms (26% of total) and 20 of 33 AWC forms (61% of total) were reviewed.The table below summarizes the checklists that were reviewed: Equipment ID SWC No. AWC No.(from SWEL)1 FT-1368 52 1 2 YCV-871 H-20 4 2 3 DG-2 51 4 4 FO-2-2 62 4 5 FO-4A-2 21 4 6 EE-8A 48 5 7 EE-4S 15 7 M 0 ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA1 2-021"BUD E-N.ElRC.QN

_._959_,__

J Excel.qpwoac.Ewyd REVISION 0 PAGE 38 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown Equipment ID SWC No. AWC No.(from SWEL)8 T1B-3C 16 7 9 FP1B 76 10 10 AC-12B-M 2 11 11 AI-41A 45 14 12 LT-1183 53 16 13 RW-262 96 16 14 HCV-478 91 18 15 CH-172 73 19 16 AC-1A 59 20 17 HCV-484 27 20 18 AC-102 66 21 19 HCV-2893 35 22 20 AC-4B 60 23 21 HCV-240 36 25 22 SI-6A 89 26 23 HCV-2918 83 29 24 B/PT-913 55 30 25 AC-7 94 33 Table 3 -Summary of Peer Reviewed Checklists ego ENGINEERING REPORT No. EAI 2-021_______ ENERCON N-2-*&ftv Ueence-qyprojEw

/d o REVISION 0 PAG E 39 O F 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 10.0 References

1. 10 CFR 50.54(f) Letter "Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1 j 2.3 and 9.3 of the Near Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-lchi Accident", dated March 12, 2012 2. EPRI 1025286, Seismic Walkdown Guidance for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, June 2012 3. OPPD Fort Calhoun Power Station Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).Revision 4, Issued 04-15-2011

4. OPPD Fort Calhoun Station Plant Level Design Basis Document (PLDBD)5. Generic Letter No, 88-20, Supplement 4, Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities

6. Generic Letter No, 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 7. Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) Procedure:

Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Revision 3A, December 2001 8. NRC-98-129 "Fort Calhoun Station, Unit No.1 -Closeout of Unresolved Safety Issue A-46 (TAC No. M69447)", dated July 30, 1998 9. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Endorsement of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) document 1025286, "Seismic Walkdown Guidance", May 31, 2012""

.O ENER ONENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021.tellence-4n5r typectEve/ydq REVISION 0 PAGE 40 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 10. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 2 1 st Century -The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," July 12, 2011 11. Nuclear Reactors and Earthquakes, TID-7024, Division of Licensing and Regulation, AEC, Washington, D.C., August, 1963 12. Design Criteria for Nuclear Reactors Subjected to Earthquake Hazards, Newmark, N.M., Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois (presented in Tokyo, 1968)13. Report to AEC Regulatory Staff, Adequacy of the Structural Criteria for Fort Calhoun Station -Unit No.1, Omaha Public Power District (Docket No. 50-285), by N.M. Newmark, W.J. hall and A.J. Hendron, January 12, 1968 14. USNRC Safety Evaluation Report of Alternate Seismic Criteria and Methodologies-Fort Calhoun Station, April 16, 1993, TAC No. M71408 (NRC-93-0150)15. EA-FC-94-003, Alternate Seismic Criteria and Methodologies, Rev.0 16. USNRC Safety Evaluation Report, Fort Calhoun Station Unit No.1 -Request for Relief from Modifying Pipe Supports SIS-63/65, SIH-3 and RCH-13 (TAC-No. M5547), OPPD Tracking No. NRC-96-188

17. Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Revision 2, Corrected 02/14/98, Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG), February 1992 18. NRC letter to SQUG Members dated May 22, 1992, Supplemental No.1 to Generic Letter 87-02 transmitting Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report No.2 (SSER No.2) on SQUG Generic Implementation Procedure, Revision 2, Corrected February 14, 1992 (GIP-2)

I'I ENGINEERING REPORT NO. EA12-021.xceflence qp;4 .Evydq REVISION 0 PAGE 41 OF 42 Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation

2.3 Seismic

Walkdown 19. SQUG Letter to NRC dated August 21, 1992, SQUG Response to Generic Letter 87-02, Supplement 1 and Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report No.2 on the SQUG GIP 20. EA-FC-93-085, NRC USI A-46 and Seismic IPEEE Resolution

21. NRC Letter to OPPD dated July 30, 1998, Fort Calhoun Station Unit No.1 -Closeout of Unresolved Safety Issue A-46 (TAC No. M69447), OPPD Tracking No. NRC-98-129

22. Generic Implementation Procedure for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Revision 3, Updated 05/16/97 (GIP-3), Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG), May 1997 23. NRC letter for SQUG dated December 4, 1997, Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report No.3 (SSER No. 3) on the Review of Revision 3 to the Generic Implementation Procedure for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Updated May 16, 1997 (GIP-3)24. Fort Calhoun Station Calculation FC06945 (AREVA NP Inc., Document 32-5028554-01, FCS RSG -RCS Structural Evaluation)

FCS RSG -RCS Structural Analysis 25. SL-4910, Individual Plant Examinations for External Events Seismic Margin Assessment Final Technical Report, March 1994, Revision 0 26. EA 96-017, SQUG Program Document Update, Revision 1 27. USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.200, An Approach for Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results; for Risk-Informed Activities, Revision 2 11.0 Attachments ATTACHMENT 11.1 -SEISMIC WALKDOWN EQUIPMENT LISTS ATTACHMENT 11.2 -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS ATTACHMENT 11.3 -AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS ATTACHMENT 11.4 -POTENTIALLY ADVERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS ATTACHMENT 11.5 -LICENSING BASIS EVALUATION FORMS ATTACHMENT 11.6 -PEER REVIEW CHECKLISTS FOR SWEL ATTACHMENT 11.7 -SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES S

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 1 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 1 Equipment ID No. AC-12B Equip. Class, 0, Other Equipment Description Raw Water Strainer Location:

Bldg. Intake Floor El. 994' Room, Area Intake Structure, 13W'BB-16N'104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NE--2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Strainer base has four 1.25" diameter anchor bolts to concrete, all of which have a lack of thread engagement to their nuts (varies from 3/8" to 1"). Also, nut seems bent. CR 2012-10553 initiated.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[I NO U[I N/A--Y[ NEI U-Il N/A[-]YO NIl U[- N/A--' Enter the equipment class name from Appefidix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 2 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 1 Equipment ID No. AC-12B Equip. Classw 0, Other Equipment Description Raw Water Strainer 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NEI UI- N/A-](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 12545, Rev. 8 (File# 12107).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEl N[ U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NE[I ULi N/A[--Y[ NEI ULI N/A-l YZ NEIl ULEL N/A[--Y[ NEl Ul 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 3 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: NEII ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 1 Equipment ID No. AC-12B Equip. Class3 0, Other Equipment Description Raw Water Strainer Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao (U Date: 8/17/2012 Alex Smerch ' 8/17/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 4 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- I Equipment ID No. AC-12B Equip. Class4 0. Other Equipment Description Raw Water Strainer Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: Lack of anchor thread engagement.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 5 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NO U[--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 2 Equipment ID No. AC-12B-M Equip. Class' 0, Other Equipment Description RAW WATER STRAINER AC-12B MOTOR Location:

Bldg. Intake Floor El. 999' Room, Area Intake Structure, 13W'BB-16N'104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YN N[i ULi N/A[l 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ N[F] U[i] N/AE-l oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZl NIl UiZ N/AN anchors?' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 6 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NIF U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 2 Equipment ID No. AC-12B-M Equip. Class2 0, Other Equipment Description RAW WATER STRAINER AC-12B MOTOR 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEI U- NWAN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEi U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Not a soft target 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NEI UEI N/A[YZ N[l U-I N/AEl YZ NEI UEI N/AEl Y[ N[ U0l 0 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 7 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE N-- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 2 Equipment ID No. AC-12B-M Equip. Class3 0, Other Equipment Description RAW WATER STRAINER AC-12B MOTOR Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[i Ui]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/17/2012 Alex Smerch #-, 8/17/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 8 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE-- UF--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 2 Equipment ID No. AC-12B-M Equip. Class4 0, Other Equipment Description RAW WATER STRAINER AC-12B MOTOR 0 Photographs Note: Equipment Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 9 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 3 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H Equip. Class' 0, OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 ROOM FRESH AIR SUPPLY DAMPER Location:

Bldg. MISL Floor El. 1024' Room, Area MISL, 10W'K-11S'1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[I: NM 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YN NEJ UI- N/AED YO NDl U[-D N/AD YO NE] U-- N/A[-]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 10 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 3 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H Equip. Class2 0. OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 ROOM FRESH AIR SUPPLY DAMPER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI UI-] N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Damper is not a soft Target.YEJ NE] UELI N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN Noi ULi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?No attached lines.YE] NEI UE] N/Az 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE] UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 11 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI UE1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 3 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H Equip. Classw 0, OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 ROOM FRESH AIR SUPPLY DAMPER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[i Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/14/12 Alex Smerch 8/14/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 12 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NR-] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 3 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H Equip. Class4 0, OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 ROOM FRESH AIR SUPPLY DAMPER 0 Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 13 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YX NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 4 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H-20 Equip. Class' 0. OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 FRESH AIR INTAKE DAMPER: SOLENOID Location:

Bldg. MISL Floor El. 1020' Room, Area MISL, 1W'K-11S'1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YM N[i UE- N/A[:]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN N[-] UI- N/A[i]oxidation?

Mild surface oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN NO UI- N/A[-]anchors?I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 14 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI Ui-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 4 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H-20 Equip. Classw 0, OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 FRESH AIR INTAKE DAMPER: SOLENOID 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YDI NDI UlI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI ULI N/A--Y[ NDI UD- N/A--YN NDI UD- N/ADl Y[ NDI UD--2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 15 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UFII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 4 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H-20 Equip. Class3 0, OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 FRESH AIR INTAKE DAMPER: SOLENOID Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI- U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch -' ',. -'Date: 8/14/12 8/14/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 16 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 4 Equipment ID No. YCV-871H-20 Equip. Class4 0, OTHER Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-1 FRESH AIR INTAKE DAMPER: SOLENOID Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 17 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 5 Equipment ID No. MCC-3B1-C2R Equip. Classi 1, MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS AND WALL-MOUNTED CONTACTORS Equipment Description VA-64-EHTR CONTROL ROOM FILTER VA-64A INLET HEATER Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1013' Room, Area 57, MCC-3B1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[1 NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO NiI U-I N/A[--YE N[-] ur-] N/A[-Y-I NEi U[-L N/A[1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 18 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NoI-- UI7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 5 Equipment ID No. MCC-3BI-C2R Equip. Class2 1, MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS AND WALL-MOUNTED CONTACTORS Equipment Description VA-64-EHTR CONTROL ROOM FILTER VA-64A INLET HEATER 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YoI NEI] U] N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEIl UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI LIE] N/A[:]YZ NEI U[E] N/A-]Y[ NEI ULi N/AEl YZ NEI U-I 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 19 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NFIl UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 5 Equipment ID No. MCC-3B1-C2R Equip. Class3 1, MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS AND WALL-MOUNTED CONTACTORS Equipment Description VA-64-EHTR CONTROL ROOM FILTER VA-64A INLET HEATER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch A Date: 8/16/2012 John Kao 8/16/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 20 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YM NEI- UL-J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 5 Equipment ID No. MCC-3B1-C2R Equip. Class4 1, MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS AND WALL-MOUNTED CONTACTORS Equipment Description VA-64-EHTR CONTROL ROOM FILTER VA-64A INLET HEATER Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 21 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NEI ULi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 6 Equipment ID No. 1B3A Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3A (EE-4F)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 1OWC-21N'5B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

GE Type AKD-5 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[-] NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YO NW-] ur- N/A[-D YO NWI U[-W N/AD-YM NW- U[-W N/AW-Y[-] NW- UW- N/A[' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 22 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NF-] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 6 Equipment ID No. IB3A Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3A (EE-4F)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN N[:]U[: Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE NE] U-- N/A[-]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI ULi N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YN NE] U0I N/A[l 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI ULi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The following items are not a seismic concern but were noted on the walkdowns:

Terminations 13, 14, 15 on 1B3A-101 (not coming in from side) see photo.(B) Silver oxide outside cable connection missing (not part of contact surface) in 1B3A- 103.(A, B, C) Silver oxide outside cable connection missing (not part contact surface).

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 23 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NOI U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 6 Equipment ID No. 1B3A Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3A (EE-4F)Evaluated by: .Russ Placke A ý Ashwin Patel, PA R p ý;Date: 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 24 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 6 Equipment ID No. 1B3A Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B3A (EE-4F)Photographs Note: View showing wiring for terminations 13, 14 and 15 not coming in from the side on IB3A-101.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 25 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 6 Equipment ID No. 1B3A Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B3A (EE-4F)Note: ziiver oxiae missing on L ror panei Note: tiiver oxiae missing on A, IB3A-103.

panel IB3A-104.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 26 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YLI NE UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 7 Equipment ID No. 1B3B Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3B (EE-4H)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, IOWC.-9N'5B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN Ni 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y[-] NO- UOil N/A[:1 YOI NEI UL- N/A--YOI Ni U[-I N/A[--YOI NEI UI-] N/A-0' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 27 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YEI NO UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 7 Equipment ID No. 1B3B Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B3B (EE-4H)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI- N[i UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEl N[i UI- N/A--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NE: U[i: N/A[--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE- NEl UE- N/AE-I 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE- N[E] U[:]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE- NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 28 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 S u YE Status: YI-- N[Z U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 7 Equipment ID No. 1B3B Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B3B (EE-4H)Evaluated by: Date: 0 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 29 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y'- NO UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 7 Equipment ID No. 1B3B Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3B (EE-4H)Photographs Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 30 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YDI NO U-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 7 Equipment ID No. IB3B Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3B (EE-4H)

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 31 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YI- NE UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 8 Equipment ID No. IB3C Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B3C (EE-4K)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 1OWC-ION'4A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NEil 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YEI NEI U-I N/AE-YEI NEI Ul] N/AL]YO] Nil UL- N/A[]Y[I NEl] Ul- N/A--I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 32 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y-I NO U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 8 Equipment ID No. 1B3C Equip. Class' 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3C (EE-4K)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[-] NEIl UE1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y-I N-I U--I N/AJ--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI Nil UEI N/AE-l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[-] NEI UIl N/AFl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[I NEIl Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[-l NEl UEl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 33 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y-- NO U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 8 Equipment ID No. IB3C Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB3C (EE-4K)Evaluated by: Date:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 34 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YD NO ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 8 Equipment ID No. IB3C Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B3C (EE-4K)Photographs Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 35 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YI- NE UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 8 Equipment ID No. 1B3C Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B3C (EE-4K)Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 36 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YEr- NE U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 9 Equipment ID No. 1B4A Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B4A (EE-4G)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 10E'D-15S'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YrI ND- U[-I N/AD-YD- N[-] U-- N/A--YEI NDI UD-] N/AD-YDI ND-] UDI N/AD]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 37 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[-- NO UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 9 Equipment ID No. IB4A Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B4A (EE-4G)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE-- NEI- ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[-- N[:] UI- N/AEIII 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NEll U[I N/A'-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[-- N[-- UI- N/A[-l 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEl] N[i ULi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEl NE] Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 38 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YEI- NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 9 Equipment ID No. 1B4A Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B4A (EE-4G)Evaluated by: Date:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 39 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: Y-I NE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 9 Equipment ID No. 1B4A Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B4A (EE-4G)Photoaraphs Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 40 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE-- NZ UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 9 Equipment ID No. IB4A Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4A (EE-4G)Note: Note: 0 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 41 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YEI NO U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 10 Equipment ID No. 1B4B Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4B (EE-4J)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 10E'D-12N'5B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE-I N[: UI-] N/AE]Y-I N[] U-I N/A[--YEi' NEI U[- N/A--Y-I NEI U-I N/A--I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 42 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YO-- NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 10 Equipment ID No. 1B4B Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B4B (EE-4J)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI- N[-] UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[I- NEl ULi N/A[l 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YLi NE] UI] N/A[II and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[I- N[i UL-l N/AI-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI- N[i UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE-] NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0 0 0 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 43 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YI- NO UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 10 Equipment ID No. IB4B Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B4B (EE-4J)Evaluated by: Date:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 44 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YEI- NO UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 10 Equipment ID No. 1B4B Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4B (EE-4J)Photographs Note: Note: 0 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 45 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y-- NO U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 10 Equipment ID No. IB4B Equip. Class' 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS 1B4B (EE-4J)Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 46 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y-- NZ U-III Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 11 Equipment ID No. IB4C Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4C (EE-4L)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 15WC-4N'4A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE N[-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YOI NOi UrI N/A[-YOI NEi U-I N/A--YOI NEI U-I N/A[-YOI NEi U-I N/A--0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 47 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NZ U-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 11 Equipment ID No. IB4C Equip. Class 1 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4C (EE-4L)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[I: NEi ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[I- NEi U[I- N/A[--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YD-- NOi UEi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YoI Nil UDj N/AEl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[l] N[l] U--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEll N[-] Ul-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 48 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YDI NE UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 11 Equipment ID No. IB4C Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4C (EE-4L)Evaluated by: Date: 0 0 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 49 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE- NO UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 11 Equipment ID No. IB4C Equip. Class' 2. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4C (EE-4L)Photouraohs Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 50 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y-- NN U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 11 Equipment ID No. IB4C Equip. Class 1 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 480 VOLT BUS IB4C (EE-4L)Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 51 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NEI UD1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 12 Equipment ID No. 1A4-11 Equip. Class' 2, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description BREAKER UNIT FEEDER FOR RAW WATER PUMP AC-10B Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 1A4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE NLI U-I N/A--Y[ N[l ULi N/A[-]YO N[-] U[-L N/A-J' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 52 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NE]1 UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 12 Equipment ID No. 1A4-11 Equip. Class 3 Equipment Description 4.16 KV FEEDER BREAKER TO AC-10B 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NE]I U-I N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NEI UEi N/AI]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NO Ur- N/A-1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are fluorescent light bulbs in hallways near equipment that are not caged which could cause a potentially adverse seismic condition with nearby equipment.

CR 2012-10423 has been initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UE] N/AE-]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEI NO UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?S EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 53 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 12 Equipment ID No. 1A4-11 Equip. Class 3 Equipment Description 4.16 KV FEEDER BREAKER TO AC-10B Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[- ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch Date: 8/16/2012 John KaoffC- kAao8/621 8/16/2012 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 54 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEI ULII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 12 Equipment ID No. 1A4-11 Equip. Class 3 Equipment Description 4.16 KV FEEDER BREAKER TO AC-1OB Photographs EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 55 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YDI NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 13 Equipment ID No. 1A3 Equip. Class 1 3, MEDIUM VOLTAGE, METAL-CLAD SWITCHGEAR Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4C)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1016' Room, Area 56, 11WC-18N'IA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[-i NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YO NOi U[-I N/A[Y[-] N[ Ur N/Ar]Y[-I NO U[I N/A-]YO NI U-I N/A-'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 56 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NM U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 13 Equipment ID No. 1A3 Equip. Class 1 3. MEDIUM VOLTAGE, METAL-CLAD SWITCHGEAR Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4C)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI NE] ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YLI NEr1 UI- N/A[--8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI NE] UE- N/A--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y--] NE] UE] N/AE-]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE] UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 57 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM.Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[--Z N[Z UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 13 Equipment ID No. 1A3 Equip. Class' 3, MEDIUM VOLTAGE, METAL-CLAD SWITCHGEAR Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4C)Evaluated by: Date:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 58 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YEI NO U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 13 Equipment ID No. 1A3 Equip. Class 1 3, MEDIUM VOLTAGE, METAL-CLAD SWITCHGEAR Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4C)Photographs Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 59 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YEI NZ U-III Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 13 Equipment ID No. 1A3 Equip. Class 1 3, MEDIUM VOLTAGE, METAL-CLAD SWITCHGEAR Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4C)

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 60 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YE] NZ UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 14 Equipment ID No. 1A4 Equip. Class 1 3. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4D)Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1016' Room, Area 56, 16WC-18N'1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y ] N[-]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y[--I NEI U-- N/A--Y-I NEI U-I N/A[-Y[-1 N-I U[-I N/A[-D YL- NDI U0 N/AD-1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 61 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YDI NO UnII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 14 Equipment ID No. 1A4 Equip. Class 1 3. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4D)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[I- N[I- U[I-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YL- N[-] U[I] N/AFl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE] NI-] U[I N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[-] N[I U[-] N/A[l 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEr NOI U[-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 62 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YEI NZ UFI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 14 Equipment ID No. 1A4 Equip. Class 1 3, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4D)Evaluated by: Date:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 63 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YO NO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 14 Equipment ID No. 1A4 Equip. Class 1 3, LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4D)Photographs Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 64 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YDI NO UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 14 Equipment ID No. 1A4 Equip. Class 1 3. LOW VOLTAGE SWITCHGEAR AND BREAKER PANELS Equipment Description 4.16KV BUS (EE-4D)Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 65 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NEIl UrI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 15 Equipment ID No. EE-4S Equip. Class, 4, TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description INVERTER #1, EE-8P BYPASS TRANSFORMER Location:

Bldg. AUX FloorEl. 1011' Room, Area 56, OW'C-1 1 N'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ N[i U[:I N/A[-l 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE Nil UrI N/A[-l oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN Ni] UiZ N/A[l anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 66 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 15 Equipment ID No. EE-4S Equip. Class2 4. TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description INVERTER #1, EE-8P BYPASS TRANSFORMER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NZ U-- N/AL](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

No documentation identified.

Anchor layout shown in sketches below.Further license basis evaluation required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y-I NZ UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are fluorescent lights located overhead nearby that are not caged which could cause a potentially adverse seismic condition with nearby equipment.

CR 2012-10423 has been initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NE-I u[-] N/A--Y[] NE u-- N/AL]YE NEI u-- N/AL]YL] NZ UE 0 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 67 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 15 Equipment ID No. EE-4S Equip. Class3 4, TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description INVERTER #1, EE-8P BYPASS TRANSFORMER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch Date: 8/16/2012 8/16/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 68 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 15 Equipment ID No. EE-4S Equip. Class4 4, TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description INVERTER #1, EE-8P BYPASS TRANSFORMER Photographs Plan W6 6" k 30"1/2" anchor bolt (typ.)6"t Elev.Note: Equipment is attached to two W6's, Note: which are anchored to concrete wall 0 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 69 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NE] Ur--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 16 Equipment ID No. T1B-3C Equip. Class, 4, TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description 4160/480 TRANSFORMER BUS 1 B3C Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 7W'C-17N'4A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NE] UE] N/AE]The transformer is welded to embed channels.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NEI UE- N/AE-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NE] uF-E N/AE]anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 70 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ ND] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 16 Equipment ID No. T1B-3C Equip. Class2 4, TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description 4160/480 TRANSFORMER BUS 1B3C 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ NEi UI- N/A-](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing A-5438 (File#43610).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NDJ U[-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are fluorescent light bulbs in hallways near equipment that are not caged which could cause a potentially adverse seismic condition with nearby equipment.

CR 2012-10423 has been initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NED UE- N/AD-YDI NE UD- N/AD-]YD] NDI UD- N/AE YD-- NE UM 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 71 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE]- UFIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 16 Equipment ID No. T1B-3C Equip. Class3 4, TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description 4160/480 TRANSFORMER BUS 1B3C Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch " -Date: 8/16/2012 8/16/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 72 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 16 Equipment ID No. TIB-3C Equip. Class4 4. TRANSFORMERS Equipment Description 4160/480 TRANSFORMER BUS 1 B3C Photographs Note: Equipment.

cage.4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 73 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 17 Equipment ID No. AC-3C Equip. Class, 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1027' Room, Area 69, 1W'N-3N'8A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NEl of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ N[i U[i N/AEl 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YM NEi UEi N/AEl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE] UE- N/A[-]anchors?'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 74 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NIEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 17 Equipment ID No. AC-3C Equip. Class2 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NL] UFII N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage is consistent with drawing 11405-S-53, Rev. 6 (File#16438).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NEI UEI N/AZ Y[ NEI U-I N/A[-l YZ Nil UI- N/AEl Y[ NEIl Ul 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 75 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 17 Equipment ID No. AC-3C Equip. Class3 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/21/2012 Alex Smerch f 8/21/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 76 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NZ UM-']Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 17 Equipment ID No. AC-3C Equip. Class4 5. HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP Photographs Note: Equipment Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 77 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NOI URI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 18 Equipment ID No. AC-3B Equip. Class' 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. AUX 1027' Room, Area 69, 1W'N-4'S8A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ N[I-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YN NEil Ui N/AD-In-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN N[l UEi N/ADJ oxidation?

In-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ N[-] U-- N/A[-]anchors?I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 78 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 18 Equipment ID No. AC-3B Equip. Class2 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NiE U[E] N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEJ NEl UEJ N/AE YE N[E] U[E- N/A[E]YE NEJ UIE N/AE-]YE NE J U[-2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 79 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 18 Equipment ID No. AC-3B Equip. Class3 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/21/2012 Alex Smerch 8/21/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 80 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UL-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 18 Equipment ID No. AC-3B Equip. Class4 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP Photographs Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 81 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZK NDI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 19 Equipment ID No. CH-1A Equip. Class' 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 991' Room, Area 6, 5E'U-4N'6E Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NDI UD-- N/ADl 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YS NDl UD- N/AD--oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ ND: UD N/AD anchors?I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 82 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 19 Equipment ID No. CH-1A Equip. Class2 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NE U[E N/A[-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 11405-S-48, Rev. 7 (File# 16433) and 11405-S-69, Rev. 5 (File# 16454).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NE uE- N/AEJ YE NE UE N/A-YE NE UO- N/A[-YM NEI Ur S 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 83 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE NI UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 19 Equipment ID No. CH-1A Equip. Class3 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[i U[i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao U Date: 8/20/12 Alex Smerch ' -z -8/20/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 84 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nr-D U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 19 Equipment ID No. CH-1A Equip. CIass4 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP Photographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 85 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NFI UE--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 20 Equipment ID No. FO-17-2 Equip. Class' 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-2 DC MOTOR DRIVEN FUEL OIL BOOSTER PUMP Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1010' Room, Area 64, 20W'F-22N'1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NEl UEI N/AE--3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE-] UEI- N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE-- NEi UE- N/AN anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 86 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE-- UE--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 20 Equipment ID No. FO-17-2 Equip. Classw 5. HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-2 DC MOTOR DRIVEN FUEL OIL BOOSTER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI U[i N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UI-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ NEI ULi N/A[II 0 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NOI UI- N/A--and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YE N[] UEi N/AE-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEi UrI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 87 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ N[-] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 20 Equipment ID No. FO- 7-2 Equip. Class3 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-2 DC MOTOR DRIVEN FUEL OIL BOOSTER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEI- UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch --Date: 8/15/2012 John KaoY0"' j8/15/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 88 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NFI UFi--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 20 Equipment ID No. FO-17-2 Equip. Class4 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR DG-2 DC MOTOR DRIVEN FUEL OIL BOOSTER PUMP Photographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 89 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YN U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 21 Equipment ID No. FO-4A-2 Equip. Class' 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description D2 FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP #1 Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1012' Room, Area 64, 3W'K-6S'2B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NOI-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NEJ U[i N/A[!3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ N[il U[- N/A[]oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YI- NE] ULI N/AN anchors?I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 90 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NDI ULIJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 21 Equipment ID No. FO-4A-2 Equip. Class2 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description D2 FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP #1 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NDI UI N/AOl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 303.18-IC-01, Rev. 2 (File# 55108).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NO ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fan overhead possibly missing tie down clips. Could be out of licensing basis or may not require all clips to be attached.

CR 2012-10367 has been initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE ND U' N/A--YO NE UD N/AD-]YE ND I UD] N/AD YD- NM UD-0 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 91 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NoII U-IJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 21 Equipment ID No. FO-4A-2 Equip. Class3 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description D2 FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP #1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi UMI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch Date: 8/15/12 8/15/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 92 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NF UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 21 Equipment ID No. FO-4A-2 Equip. Class4 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description D2 FUEL OIL TRANSFER PUMP #1 Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: Fan shield above equipment with holes for additional bolts.4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 93 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NfZ U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 22 Equipment ID No. FW-1O Equip. Class' 5. HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description AUXILIARY FEEDWATER PUMP (TURBINE-DRIVEN)

Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 991' Room, Area 19, 3W'C-IN'3A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEil of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?One anchor was inspected to find that the nut was not flush with the baseplate, upon further inspection of the configuration drawings it was found that this anchor in question was not required, and was most likely just used for leveling for installation.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NDI U[I- N/AD-Y[ NEI Ur- N/AD-I YZ NDI U[- N/AD-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 94 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ Nn] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 22 Equipment ID No. FW-1O Equip. Class2 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description AUXILIARY FEEDWA TER PUMP (TURBINE-DRIVEN)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ N[i UI- N/AEi (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with drawing 11405-S-47, Rev. 14 (File#16432) and 11405-S-69, Rev. 5 (File# 16454).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[] UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Pump not soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Unistrut nearby appears to be missing clamp but its failure would not damage pump as it is a non significant threat.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YE- NE] uE] N/AZ Y[ NE:] uEJ N/AE-Y[ NE] UE- N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?0, 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 95 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 22 Equipment ID No. FW-1O Equip. Class3 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description AUXILIARY FEEDWA TER PUMP (TURBINE-DRIVEN)

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Nearby scaffolding anchored at only I point would be blocked by pipe supports if $eismic motion occured and would not contact pump.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)'

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch a-%John Kao 8o a Date: 8/13/12 8/13/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 96 OF 404 ATTACHMENT

9.6 SEISMIC

WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Yo Nit U'-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 22 Equipment ID No. FW-1O Equip. Class4 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description AUXILIARY FEEDWA TER PUMP (TURBINE-DRIVEN)

Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: Anchorage showing bolts between skid and skid and foundation and pump and skid.4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 97 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YE] NM U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 23 Equipment ID No. FW-6 Equip. Class 1 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description AUXILIARY FEEDWA TER PUMP (MOTOR-DRIVEN)

Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 992' Room, Area 19, 4W'C-5S'4A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[ N[-]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NE] UE] N/AE]YEI NE] UE] N/AE]YEI]* NE] UE] N/AE]YEI NEI UE] NIAE]YEI NEI UE]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 98 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YI- NE UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 23 Equipment ID No. FW-6 Equip. Class 1 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description AUXILIARY FEEDWA TER PUMP (MOTOR-DRIVEN)

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YI- NEI U[I- N/Alj 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI- N[i ULI N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YLI NEI UL[] N/A~l 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YL[ NEi ULI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YrI NOi ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 99 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM.Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Yr-Z N[ U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 23 Equipment ID No. FW-6 Equip. Class 1 5, HORIZONTAL PUMPS Equipment Description AUXILIARY FEEDWA TER PUMP (MOTOR-DRIVEN)

Photographs Note: Note: Note: Note:

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 100 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 101 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y] NEIl U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 24 Equipment ID No. AC-1i B Equip. Class' 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 994' Room, Area INTAKE, 1E"'CC-IN'103 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM--! N[of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YIN N[-- UrI N/A--Welded.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEil Ui N/AEl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ N[i ULi N/A--anchors?I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 102 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 24 Equipment ID No. AC-10B Equip. Class2 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI- NDi U-I N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE Nil ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y-I NEI U[- N/A[YE NEI U[-1 N/A--YE NEI U[I N/Ar1 Y[I NEIl U[-Ii 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 103 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ ND UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 24 Equipment ID No. AC-10B Equip. Classw 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for'and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi U[I-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch Date: 8/17/2012 John Kaof','1 8/17/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 104 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NiF Ul--]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 24 Equipment ID No. AC-1OB Equip. Class4 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP Photographs 0 Note: Equipment Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 105 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NDI UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 25 Equipment ID No. AC-10D Equip. Class' 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 994' Room, Area INTAKE, 1E'CC-1N'104 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YDI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YM NE] uD:] N/AD-]Welded.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO ND:] UD-- N/AD--oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NDl U[-D N/AD-anchors?' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 106 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ Nn U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 25 Equipment ID No. AC-1 0D Equip. Class2 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I N-I Ui- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is requi~ed.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[I U-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y-I NEI U-I N/A[YZ NEi UIZ N/A--YjN NEI U-I N/A--YN NEI[ U[-2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 107 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UF-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 25 Equipment ID No. AC-10D0 Equip. Class3 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch A< I Date: 8/17/2012 John Kaoe -k 8/17/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 108 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NF-] Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 25 Equipment ID No. AC-10D Equip. Class4 6, VERTICAL PUMPS Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMP Photoaraohs Note: 0 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 109 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YjN N-- UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 26 Equipment ID No. HCV-474 Equip. Class' 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description Sl-1A&B,2A,B&C/SI-3A-C BRG CLRS CCW INLET HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 992' Room, Area 6, 9W'T-2N'6E Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YM N[I- U[I N/A[-]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[l UI- N/A[--oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NUi UI- N/AEl anchors?' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 110 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UL--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 26 Equipment ID No. HCV-474 Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SI-1A&B,2AB&C/SI-3A-C BRG CLRS CCW INLET HEADER ISOLATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-I NEI UEi NIAZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEi U-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[I N[-] U[I] NIA[Y[ NEI Ur- N/Arl YZ NEl UEi N/AE]YZ NEIl UI-2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 111 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 26 Equipment ID No. HCV-474 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SI-1A&B,2AB&C/SI-3A-C BRG CLRS CCW INLET HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YN N[:]UL Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/20/2012 Alex Smerch 8/20/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B- Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 112 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE Nr] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 26 Equipment ID No. HCV-474 Equip. Class4 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SI-1A&B,2AB&C/SI-3A-C BRG CLRS CCW INLET HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 113 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-Ir Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 91 Equipment ID No. HCV-478 Equip. Class' 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SPENT FUEL POOL HT EXCH AC-8 CCW OUTLET VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 993' Room, Area 5. 6W'R-8N'5A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO- N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[-] NOi U-I N/A[YOI NEI Ui N/AZ Y[-] NEI U[I N/AN I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 114 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 91 Equipment ID No. HCV-478 Equip. Class2 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SPENT FUEL POOL HT EXCH AC-8 CCW OUTLET VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NE] UE-- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEi ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-line Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI U[- N/AE]Y[ NEI UL] N/AL]Y[ NEI U"] N/A[-]YZ NEI U[2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 115 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 91 Equipment ID No. HCV-478 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SPENT FUEL POOL HT EXCH AC-8 CCW OUTLET VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[: ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/20/2012 Alex Smerch 8/20/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 116 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ N[- UFi-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 91 Equipment ID No. HCV-478 Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SPENT FUEL POOL HT EXCH AC-8 CCW OUTLET VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 117 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ Nn ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 28 Equipment ID No. HCV-489B Equip. Class' 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-IA CCW OUTLET VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 992' Room, Area 4. 1OW'D-1N'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YE-- NEI U-E] N/AM YEI NEi U[-I N/As Y[-- Nil] U-I N/A[I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 118 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NR U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 28 Equipment ID No. HCV-489B Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-1A CCW OUTLET VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NEi ULi N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NOi ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-line valve 0 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI U- N/Ar]Y[ NDI UI N/A--YZ NDI U[-I N/A-Y[ ND UD 0 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 119 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ No U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 28 Equipment ID No. HCV-489B Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-IA CCW OUTLET VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UWl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/20/2012 Alex Smerch #-" 8/20/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 120 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NF- UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 28 Equipment ID No. HCV-489B Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-1A CCW OUTLET VALVE PhotoaraDhs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 121 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 29 Equipment ID No. HCV-497 Equip. Class, 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D CCW BYPASS LINE ISOLATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 991' Room, Area 4, 2E'E-8S'7A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI0I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[I NE] UI- N/A[3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[I- NI-] UI- N/AZ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE]l N[-1 U[-] N/A[anchors?I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 122 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NEI UFI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 29 Equipment ID No. HCV-497 Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D CCW BYPASS LINE ISOLATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I N[i U[i N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE N[i ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-line valve.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?I 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEi NEi UE] NWAN YE] NE] UE] N/A[YE] NEI UE-] N/A[YX NEi UE]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 123 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UI'-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 29 Equipment ID No. HCV-497 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D CCW BYPASS LINE ISOLATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NEi UiF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch " Date: 8/20/2012 8/20/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 124 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Yr] ND-- UFI-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 29 Equipment ID No. HCV-497 Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D CCW BYPASS LINE ISOLATION VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment.

0 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 125 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NE] UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 30 Equipment ID No. TCV-893 Equip. Classi 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description AIR CONDITIONER VA-46A CCW SUPPLY TEMPERATURE CONTROL VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1037' Room, Area 72, 8W'JI-12N'7A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI--] NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y-I Nr-I UI- N/AM 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI- N[il UL-I NWA oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YI- N[:] ULi N/AE anchors?'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 126 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 30 Equipment ID No. TCV-893 Equip. Classa 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description AIR CONDITIONER VA-46A CCW SUPPLY TEMPERATURE CONTROL VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI N[i UL-I N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEi ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-line valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[-] NEI UE] N/AZ YN NEi UE] N/AE]YE NE] UE] N/AZ Y[ NEI Ur-1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 127 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 30 Equipment ID No. TCV-893 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description AIR CONDITIONER VA-46A CCW SUPPLY TEMPERATURE CONTROL VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-I U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch A " Date: 8/18/2012 8/18/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 128 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nil U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 30 Equipment ID No. TCV-893 Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description AIR CONDITIONER VA-46A CCW SUPPLY TEMPERATURE CONTROL VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 129 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 31 Equipment ID No. HCV-2874A Equip. Class, 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 1001' Room, Area INTAKE, 6E'CC-4S'103 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE!- N]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YE! NE! U[- N/AZ In-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE!] NE! U[- N/A[oxidation?

In-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE! NE! UE! N/A[anchors?In-line valve.I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 130 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 31 Equipment ID No. HCV-2874A Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[I NE] U[-I NIA[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NEI U[-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A In line valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE] NEI U[] NfA-Y[ NE] U[-D N/A[L]Y[ NE] UE- N/AL]YM NEI UE 0 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 131 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE] NE-I UFI1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 31 Equipment ID No. HCV-2874A Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NI-] UI-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch A-L7 John Kao ?Date: 8/17/2012 8/17/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 132 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NF-R Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 31 Equipment ID No. HCV-2874A Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Photoaraohs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 133 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 32 Equipment ID No. HCV-2875A Equip. Class, 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 1001 Room, Area INTAKE, 6E'CC-7N'103 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?In-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

In-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?In-line valve.YE] NE]I U] N/A[Y[E] NE] UE NAN YE] NE] UE] N/As 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 134 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 32 Equipment ID No. HCV-2875A Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NE] UIO N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] U[]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEO NE- Ur7 N/AN 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] U- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YN NE] U-- N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 135 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[Z NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 32 Equipment ID No. HCV-2875A Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE Nr-I Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch j '&" -Date: 8/17/2012 John Kao kALO 8/17/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 136 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UL'-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 32 Equipment ID No. HCV-2875A Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER PUMPS DISCH HEADER ISOLATION VALVE PhotoaraDhs Note: Equipment Tag.Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 137 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NOI UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 33 Equipment ID No. HCV-2877A Equip. Classi 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D RAW WATER INLET HDR ISOLATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX 993' Room, Area 18,13E'D-12S'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

In-line valve.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YI- N[l UL[] N/A[In-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[:- N[I: U-I N/AN oxidation?

In-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE]l N[ll ULi N/A[anchors?In-line valve.'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 138 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 33 Equipment ID No. HCV-2877A Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D RAW WATER INLET HDR ISOLATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NE] UlI N/A[E (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] U[-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE-] NE] uE] N/AW YN NE] UE] N/AE]YN NE] UE] N/AE]YN N- U-]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 139 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NR ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 33 Equipment ID No. HCV-2877A Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D RAW WATER INLET HDR ISOLATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YN NEI Un Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch At-Date: 8/21/2012 John Kao 8/21/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 140 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: NEI Ur-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 33 Equipment ID No. HCV-2877A Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP CLG HT EXCHS AC-1A-D RAW WATER INLET HDR ISOLATION VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 141 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NEI UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 34 Equipment ID No. HCV-2880A Equip. Class, 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-1A RAW WATER INLET VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX 994' Room, Area 18, 13E'D-6S'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YI- NEi U[-- N/A[In-line valve.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI- NEi UI-I N/AM oxidation?

In-line valve.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YrI N[il U-] N/AM anchors?In-line valve.I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 142 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NO U-I!Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 34 Equipment ID No. HCV-2880A Equip. Classw 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-1A RAW WATER INLET VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[I NEi UEi N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-line valve.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-line valve.YE NEIUEj1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI NEI UEI N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UI- N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YN NEIl UI- N/Al]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI Ul of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 143 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y] NEI] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 34 Equipment ID No. HCV-2880A Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-1A RAW WATER INLET VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[i Ur-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch A-+< " Date: 8/21/2012 John Kao 8/21/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 144 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 34 Equipment ID No. HCV-2880A Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description COMP COOLING HT EXCH AC-IA RAW WATER INLET VALVE Photooraphs Note: t:qulpmenr i ag Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 145 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YO Nn UnI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 35 Equipment ID No. HCV-2893 Equip. Class' 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER TO CCW ISOLATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX 993' Room, Area 18, 13E'D-19S'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y-- NO U-I N/AN YEI NEi UI- N/A[9 YEI NEi UI- N/A[1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 146 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 35 Equipment ID No. HCV-2893 Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER TO CCW ISOLATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI-] NEI UI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi U[i potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-line valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Not a soft target 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[-- Nil Ui] N/AZ Y[ NOi UEi N/A[l]YZ NOi UEi N/AEl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 147 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE NO UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 35 Equipment ID No. HCV-2893 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER TO CCW ISOLATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[I- U[I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch A , Date: 8/21/2012 John Kao 8/21/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 148 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NR U'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 35 Equipment ID No. HCV-2893 Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description RAW WATER TO CCW ISOLATION VALVE PhotoaraDhs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 149 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE--] Un-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 36 Equipment ID No. HCV-240 Equip. Class, 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC-4 AUXILIARY SPRAY INLET VALVE Location:

Bldg. CONT Floor El. 1045' Room, Area CONT/ 14WDD-6N'II Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[I NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[I NEI U[I N/AZ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI- N[:l U-I N/AZ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NEl UI] N/AZ anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 150 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE-1 UnI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 36 Equipment ID No. HCV-240 Equip. Classw 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC-4 AUXILIARY SPRAY INLET VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE! NE! UE! N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE!potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In Line Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Not a soft target 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE! N!-] UE! N/AN Y[ NE!] UE] NIAE!Y[ NE!J UE! N/AE!-Y[ N[-] U!-]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 151 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ Noi- U0I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 36 Equipment ID No. HCV-240 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC-4 AUXILIARY SPRAY INLET VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEil Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/22/12 Alex Smerch Z 8/22/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 152 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 36 Equipment ID No. HCV-240 Equip. Class4 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC-4 AUXILIARY SPRAY INLET VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 153 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 37 Equipment ID No. LCV-218-3 Equip. Class' 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description CHRG PUMPS CH-1A,B&C SUCT HDR SAFETY INJ & BORIC ACID SUPPLY VLV Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 992' Room, Area 7, 45W'T-2N'7B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[O NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NE] U--] N/A[]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ Ni: Ul-I N/A[]oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ NEi UI- N/AE]anchors?' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 154 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NEI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 37 Equipment ID No. LCV-218-3 Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description CHRG PUMPS CH-1AB&C SUCT HDR SAFETY INJ & BORIC ACID SUPPLY VLV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NO UI- N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Needs plant documentation to verify. See sketch in photos section.Licensing Basis Evaluation is required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[-] No UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NE] U[E] NIAE]Y[ NEI UE-] N/A[E]YO NEI U[-] N/A[-YO NEI UE]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 155 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[Z NF- UL-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 37 Equipment ID No. LCV-218-3 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description CHRG PUMPS CH-1A,B&C SUCT HDR SAFETY INJ & BORIC ACID SUPPLY VLV Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y~NLNEI U-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch -John Kao Date: 8/20/12 8/20/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 156 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NE] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 37 Equipment ID No. LCV-218-3 Equip. Class4 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description CHRG PUMPS CH-1AB&C SUCT HDR SAFETY INJ & BORIC ACID SUPPLY VLV Photographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 157 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y] NI- Ul--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 38 Equipment ID No. FCV-1369 Equip. Classi 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description TURB-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-1O RECIRCULATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 991' Room, Area 19. 3W'C-7N'3AA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI Nn of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y-I NE] U[I N/AZ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[-] NEIl UrI N/A[oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NE-I UI- N/AZ, anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 158 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 38 Equipment ID No. FCV-1369 Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description TURB-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-10 RECIRCULATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI U-I N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UIE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A Inline Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Valve is not a soft target.YEI NEI UE] N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Unistrut above missing clamp and just resting on support. Could fall.CR 2012-10198 has been initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?There are multiple elbows for attached line showing flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NO UE] N/A[E]YO NEI UE] N/AE]YEI NO UE]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 159 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 38 Equipment ID No. FCV-1369 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description TURB-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-1O RECIRCULATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There is a chain attached.

This item is not seen as a credible source as it does not have much mass.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch / ." --John Kao ?Date: 8/13/12 8/13/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 160 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NZl UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 38 Equipment ID No. FCV-1369 Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description TURB-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-10 RECIRCULATION VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: Unistrut Missing Clamp.4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 161 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YM NE] U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 39 Equipment ID No. HCV-1107A Equip. Class, 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE Location:

Bldg. CONT Floor El. 1050' Room, Area CONT 15WBB-9N'II Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEI- NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?1 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NEI ULI N/A-]YE NEI UL- N/AL]YE NE] UEII N/AE-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 162 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YX NRII UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 39 Equipment ID No. HCV-1107A Equip. Class2 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI U[i N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE Nl! ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NEI Uil N/AE-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEi N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YE N[-] UE- N/AE[-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI U[i of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 163 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NFI UM--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 39 Equipment ID No. HCV-1 107A Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A'AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I Evaluated by: John Kao k"O Date: 8/22/2012 Alex Smerch 8/22/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 164 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[E NE] UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 39 Equipment ID No. HCV-1 107A Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE Photographs 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 165 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 40 Equipment ID No. HCV-1107B Equip. Class, 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1038' Room, Area 81, OW'H-4N'3A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ N[i ULI N/AE-]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ NE] U[:] N/AE]oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ NE] UE] N/AE]anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 166 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U]-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 40 Equipment ID No. HCV-1107B Equip. Class2 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NM U-I N/AE1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Needs plant documentation to verify anchorage.

See sketch in photos section. Licensing Basis Evaluation is required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI NZ UEi-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM NE] U[I N/Ar-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI ULi N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YE NEi UEi N/A[l 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 167 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 40 Equipment ID No. HCV-1107B Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch Date: 8/18/2012 John Kao 8118/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 168 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NEl UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 40 Equipment ID No. HCV-1 107B Equip. Class4 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment and supports.Note: Equipment support footprint 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 169 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YZ NEI] UEr Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 40 Equipment ID No. HCV-1 107B Equip. Class5 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A AUXILIARY FEEDWATER INLET VALVE Note: Vertical Support Footprint.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 170 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NE] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 41 Equipment ID No. HCV-1384 Equip. Class' 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description MAIN AND AUXILIARY FEEDWATER CROSSCONNECT VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1039' Room, Area 81, 22E'D-21N'5B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YE] NE] UE] N/AN S 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEi UE] N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE-] NE] UEI N/AO anchors?' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 171 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 41 Equipment ID No. HCV-1384 Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description MAIN AND AUXILIARY FEEDWATER CROSSCONNECT VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I NEI U-- N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE] U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

In-line valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[E] NE] u[-] N/AE YM NE] UE:] N/AE]YE NE] U[E] NIAE]Y[ NEI U]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 172 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 41 Equipment ID No. HCV-1384 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description MAIN AND AUXILIARY FEEDWATER CROSSCONNECT VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/18/2012 Alex Smerch A'" " 8/18/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 173 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NE] UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 41 Equipment ID No. HCV-1384 Equip. Class4 7. PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description MAIN AND AUXILIARY FEEDWATER CROSSCONNECT VALVE Photographs Note: Equipment Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 174 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YM NEI UFL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 42 Equipment ID No. SA-193 Equip. Class' 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SECONDARY STARTING AIR PRESSURE REGULATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1008' Room, Area 64. 3W'F-28N'1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[-] NEI U[I N/A[YEI NEI ULi N/A[Y[-I NiD ULi N/A['Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 175 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 42 Equipment ID No. SA-193 Equip. Class2 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SECONDARY STARTING AIR PRESSURE REGULATION VALVE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YLI NEI ULi N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A, In-line valve Y[ NE] UI-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO' NE] Ul-- N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI ULI N/AZ-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YN NEI U-- N/AF-10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NR- Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 176 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE Nil UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 42 Equipment ID No. SA-193 Equip. Class3 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SECONDARY STARTING AIR PRESSURE REGULATION VALVE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[i ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch ." John Kao 7 -ý; ýý -Date: 8/15/2012 8115/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 177 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y; NEI Ur-L Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 42 Equipment ID No. SA-193 Equip. Class4 7, PNEUMATIC-OPERATED VALVES Equipment Description SECONDARY STARTING AIR PRESSURE REGULATION VALVE Photographs Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 178 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NEIl U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 43 Equipment ID No. VA-15B Equip. Class, 10, AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTAINMENT AIR COOL/FILTER UNIT B HOUSING Location:

Bldg. CONT Floor El. 1060' Room, Area CONTI OW'BB-24N'III Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one .YEI NA of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? 'Y[ N[-] UI] N/AD" YO NDJ UD- N/AD l YO ND] U[-D N/AD:]1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 179 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NFj-- UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 43 Equipment ID No. VA-15B Equip. Class2 10, AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTAINMENT AIR COOL/FILTER UNIT B HOUSING 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YLI NEI UEi N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[:] ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Large metal housing structure.

YEI N[:] UlI N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NOi ULi N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Adequately supported polar crane overhead.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YEI NEI U[-] N/A[10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 180 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] Uni-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 43 Equipment ID No. VA-15B Equip. Class3 10, AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTAINMENT AIR COOL/FILTER UNIT B HOUSING Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch Date: 8/27/12 KevinBessell 4 -8/27/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 181 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UI]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 43 Equipment ID No. VA-15B Equip. Class4 10. AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTAINMENT AIR COOL/FILTER UNIT B HOUSING Photographs Note: Equipment (large housing).Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 182 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YEE NII-J UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 44 Equipment ID No. VA-46A Equip. Class' 10, AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING UNIT Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1036 Room, Area 72, 8W'JI-12N'7A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-- NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ N[Z U-- N/A--YE NEi U[J N/A--YE N[l U[-- N/A[-]0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 183 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN N[] Ut]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 44 Equipment ID No. VA-46A Equip. Class2 10, AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING UNIT 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI U-I N/A[(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] Ut]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YtI N-] Ut] NWAN Y[ Nt] Ut] N/At]Y[ Nt] Ut] N/A[-]YM Nt] Ut]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 184 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 44 Equipment ID No. VA-46A Equip. Class3 10, AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING UNIT Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UL-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: 8/21/2012 Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch -8/21/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 185 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FoRM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NE] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 44 Equipment ID No. VA-46A Equip. Class4 10, AIR HANDLERS Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING UNIT Photographs Note: Equipment Tag.Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

.EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 186 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 0 Status: Y[Z N-I U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 45 Equipment ID No. DC-BUS-AI-41A Equip. Class' 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description PANEL BOARD Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1036' Room, Area 77, AI-41A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YZ NEI ur-] N/AD YN ND U[-D N/A[-D YO NDI U[-] N/AN I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 187 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NI-- ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 45 Equipment ID No. DC-BUS-AI-41A Equip. Class2 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description PANEL BOARD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] N[] ULI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[Z NEI U[-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NEI UiE N/A[-]YE NE] UL:] N/AL]YE NE] U[- N/AL]YE N[-] ul]2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 188 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 45 Equipment ID No. DC-BUS-AI-41A Equip. Class3 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description PANEL BOARD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[-] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao 40-6 Alex Smerch Date: 8/18/2012 8/18/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 189 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE N-- UF--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 45 Equipment ID No. DC-BUS-AI-41A Equip. Class4 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description PANEL BOARD PhotoaraDhs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 190 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YO NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 46 Equipment ID No. EE-8F Equip. Class, 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description 125V DC NUMBER 1 MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 9W'C-ON'7A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YO N[:] U-- N/A--YM ND:] UI N/A[-D Y[ N[-] U[- N/A[D I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 191 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 46 Equipment ID No. EE-8F Equip. Classa 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description 125V DC NUMBER 1 MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[I- N[i U[I- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There is only a 3/8" gap between this equipment and other safety related equipment (EE-8C) nearby, raising the possibility of out of phase displacement between these different pieces of equipment, and banging against each other CR 2012-10427 has been initiated.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?I YEr NO UL- N/AD-YZ NDI UD- N/AD-YN NDI UD N/ADl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD] No UD-]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 192 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ N[-] U[-I.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 46 Equipment ID No. EE-8F Equip. Class3 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description 125V DC NUMBER 1 MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch 'Date: 8/16/2012 John Kao 8/16/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 193 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NRi UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 46 Equipment ID No. EE-8F Equip. Class4 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description 125V DC NUMBER 1 MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL Photoara~hs Note: Equipment.

Note: Gap between pieces of equipment 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 194 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 47 Equipment ID No. I-BUS-A Equip. Class, 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description BUS Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1036' Room, Area 77, AI-40A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[] NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ NE- U[- N/A[-]Y[ NEil U[-] N/A YEI NEil U-I NIA[I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 195 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ N[] UI-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 47 Equipment ID No. I-BUS-A Equip. Class2 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description BUS 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[I- NEI ULi N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEi UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?N[--J u-- NWADi YE NEI Ul] N/AL]YE NEI U[] N/AL]YE N[-] UL]A 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 196 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN NEIj UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 47 Equipment ID No. I-BUS-A Equip. Class3 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description BUS Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NEil Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao 4 Alex Smerch Date: 8/18/2012 8/18/2012 0 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 197 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YEJ NFi- U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 47 Equipment ID No. I-BUS-A Equip. Class4 14, DISTRIBUTION PANELS AND AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCHES Equipment Description BUS Photoqragphs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 198 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NO- UMI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 48 Equipment ID No. EE-8A Equip. Class, 15, BATTERY RACKS Equipment Description 125 VDC STATION BATTERY NO. 1 Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1012' Room, Area 54, 9W'C-15N'7B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NI-]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NEI U[I- N/A[-l 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[ N[i] ULI N/AE-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[ N[i: UrI N/A[l anchors?'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 199 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NEI UnI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 48 Equipment ID No. EE-8A Equip. Class2 15, BATTERYRACKS Equipment Description 125 VDC STATION BATTERY NO. 1 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NO UI- N/AMl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

There is no anchorage documentation.

Anchorage pattem attached in photos below. Licensing Basis Evaluation is required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YOI NE ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?No attached lines.YZ NEI UI[- N/AEl YZ NEIl U[I N/AEl YEI NEL U[I N/AZ 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UL 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 200 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 48 Equipment ID No. EE-8A Equip. Class3 15, BATTERYRACKS Equipment Description 125 VDC STATION BATTERY NO. 1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS N[-] URI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0 Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch " Date: 8/15/12 8/15/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 201 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NEIl U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 48 Equipment ID No, EE-8A Equip. Class4 15, BATTERY RACKS Equipment Description 125 VDC STATION BATTERY NO. 1 Photographs 35 34 64 64 64 35 34 44 44 45 45 component.

34 34[Shower ef.)Above Is a plan sketch of the 16 anchor bolts for the Ballery Racks.All Dimensions are in Inches.All anchor diameters are .75" Note: Field measured anchor dimensions for battery rack (require LB verification).

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 202 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 49 Equipment ID No. EE-8C Equip. Class' 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description 125V DC BATTERY CHARGER NUMBER 1 Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56. 9W'C-13N'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ Nr-]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YN NDl Ul-] N/AD-]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface, YN ND] U[] N/AD-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN ND] UD- N/AD-anchors?Some surface pitting of the concrete, not near embedded plates.I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 203 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ NE-] UFI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 49 Equipment ID No. EE-8C Equip. Class2 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description 125V DC BATTERY CHARGER NUMBER 1 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI N[ U[I- N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Needs plant documentation.

See sketch in photo's section. Licensing Basis Evaluation is required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y-I N[ ULI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

There exists a between a 0" and 3/8" gap between EE-8C and EE-8F.These are two independently anchored pieces of equipment which during out of phase seismic motion could come into contact. CR 2012-10427 has been initiated.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There are fluorescent light bulbs in hallways near equipment that are not caged which could cause a potentially adverse seismic condition with nearby equipment.

CR 2012-10423 has been initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NO U[-I N/A--YEI NO ULI N/Ar-YEI NE-] UL N/AI, YrI NO U[1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 204 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE NFJ U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 49 Equipment ID No. EE-8C Equip. Class3 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description 125V DC BATTERY CHARGER NUMBER 1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UL]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch At- ----.-'Date: 8/16/12 John Kao V -8/16/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 205 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKUST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 49 Equipment ID No. EE-8C Equip. Class4 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description 125V DC BATTERY CHARGER NUMBER 1 Photographs Note: 3/8" Gap Between EE-8C and EE-8F.4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 206 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NI D UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 49 Equipment ID No. EE-8C Equip. ClasS5 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Eauipment Description 125V DC BATTERY CHARGER NUMBER 1 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 207 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: Y[ ND-- U F-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 50 Equipment ID No. EE-8H Equip. Classi 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description INSTRUMENT BUS "A" INVERTER "A" Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1011' Room, Area 56, 7W'C-6N'6D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM ,NFI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YIM Nil UI-I N/AE--3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI] U[- N/A-l oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ N[-] U'- N/ADl anchors?' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 208 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[Z NE-I U F-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 50 Equipment ID No. EE-8H Equip. Class2 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description INSTRUMENT BUS "A" INVERTER "A" 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI- NO U[I- N/A--(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage attachment drawings to Plant floor could not be found. A licensing basis evaluation is required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI- No U-]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Fluorescent light bulbs overhead that are not caged which could cause a potentially adverse seismic condition with nearby equipment.

CR 2012-10423 has been initiated.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[-] Ul-] N/A[-]Y-I N[ U-I N/A--YO NEI ULI N/AI-]Yr- N[ UL1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 209 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI U L]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 50 Equipment ID No. EE-8H Equip. Class3 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description INSTRUMENT BUS "A" INVERTER "A" Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEi UiF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch John Kao ?-Date: 8/16/2012 8/16/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 210 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YE Nr-l U rl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 50 Equipment ID No. EE-8H Equip. Class4 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description INSTRUMENT BUS "A" INVERTER "A" Photographs I Note: Equipment Tag Noje: i-iuorescenr I overhead.4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 211 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: Y[ NE] UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 50 Equipment ID No. EE-8H Equip. Class5 16, BATTERY CHARGERS AND INVERTERS Equipment Description INSTRUMENT BUS "A" INVERTER "A" Mounting base (typ.) I Note: Anchorage configuration sketch.Note: 5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 212 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NEI ULI-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 51 Equipment ID No. DG-2 Equip. Class, 17, ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

1. 2 Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1010' Room, Area 64, 3E'F-7S'2B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

GM Electromotive 20-645-E4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN N--of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ NEi U[-] N/A[-]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE N[-] U[I- N/A[--oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the Y[D NE- ULi N/Ar--anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 213 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NF] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 51 Equipment ID No. DG-2 Equip. Class2 17, ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

1. 2 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[ N[O UL- N/A[-](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage is consistent with drawing 11405-S-52, Rev. 6 (File#16437).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[O U[I-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Not a soft target 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

YE] N[E] U[I N/A0 Y[ NEI ULI N/AL]I, 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[ N[] U[-] N/A[-]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NF] UL 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 214 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NR ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 51 Equipment ID No. DG-2 Equip. Class3 17, ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

1. 2 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI- NO UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Insulation of piping on top of generator may have not been included in original seismic analysis.

CR 2012-10369 has been initiated.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch .Date: 8/15/2012 John Kao 8/15/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 215 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nr-' U-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 51 Equipment ID No. DG-2 Equip. Class4 17, ENGINE GENERATORS Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

1. 2 Photographs Note: Equipment Note: Insulated line on top of generator.

4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 216 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 5 Status: YE NDI UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 52 Equipment ID No. FT-1368 Equip. Class' 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-6 SUCTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 993' Room, Area 19, 1W'C-4S'4A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YX NE] U[i N/A[D 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO N[D UI- N/AI-I oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YN N[: UI- N/A[--anchors?0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 217 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NEI U-IIE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 52 Equipment ID No. FT-1368 Equip. Class2 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-6 SUCTION FLOW TRANSMITTER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI- NO U-I N/AFl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing 3143K10-058, Sh. 1, Rev. 10 (File# 9906) is used for anchorage configuration verification.

Item anchorage may not be consistent with Plant documentation since anchor angle plate is rotated flipped (see photo below and reference drawing).

Note on drawing states to see drawing 11405-M-54, Sh. 20 for field configuration.

More information is needed and a Licensing Basis Evaluation is required.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEr NO UL!potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEIl UIE N/Ar-Y[ NEI- UE-I N/A--YO NE!] UEr N/A--YO N[-] U--2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 218 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YEE ND UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 52 Equipment ID No. FT-1368 Equip. Class3 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-6 SUCTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEi UI-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Date: 8/13/12 Alex Smerch 't-- " 8/13/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 219 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 52 Equipment ID No. FT-1368 Equip. Class4 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-6 SUCTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Photographs Note: Side view of equipment showing its mounting bracket flipped from configuration drawing.Note: Equipment close to combustibles.(Acceptable for maintenance area under SO-G-91)4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 220 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 5 of 5 Status: YE NEI UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 52 Equipment ID No. FT-1368 Equip. Classs 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Eauipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN AUX FEED PUMP FW-6 SUCTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Note: Equipment.

Note: Equipment Wall anchorage.

5 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 221 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YE NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 53 Equipment ID No. LT-1183 Equip. Class' 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EMGY FEEDWATER STORAGE TNK FW-19 LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 1039' Room, Area 81, 18W'C-13N'3A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y[ N[] uEI N/AD YZ N[:] U[-- N/A[YN N[-- UE-- N/AE-'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 222 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NI-- U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 53 Equipment ID No. LT-1183 Equip. Class2 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EMGY FEEDWATER STORAGE TNK FW-19 LEVEL TRANSMITTER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YZ NEi UEi N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage configuration is consistent with C-4467, Sh. 1, Rev. I (File# 64132) and C-4467, Sh. 2, Rev. 0 (File# 64133).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ N[il ULi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U-I N/A-1 YZ NEI U[] N/Al]YE NEI Ul] N/AL]Y[ N[-] Ul 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 223 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NE] UD-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 53 Equipment ID No. LT-1183 Equip. Class3 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EMGY FEEDWATER STORAGE TNK FW-19 LEVEL TRANSMITTER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEi ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kao Alex Smerch ----Date: 8/18/2012 8/18/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 224 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKuST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ NiE U-II Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 53 Equipment ID No. LT-1183 Equip. Class4 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description EMGY FEEDWATER STORAGE TNK FW-19 LEVEL TRANSMITTER Photographs Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 225 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ ND ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 54 Equipment ID No. B/LT-911 Equip. Class' 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. CONT Floor El. 1011' Room, Area CONT, 15WCC-3N'I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YM N[l U[i N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[N N[D UD-- N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YZ Nni Ur N/A[Z]anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 226 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 54 Equipment ID No. B/LT-911 Equip. Class2 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YOI NEi ULi N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ Noi UOI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is a cable tray above which is adequately braced and not a credible source for seismic interaction.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ N-] Ul- N/A--Y[ N- Ul-] N/AL-]YN NE] U[-] N/A[-]Y[ NO UE-S 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 227 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN N[i UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 54 Equipment ID No. B/LT-911 Equip. Class3 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UI--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch --Date: 8/27/12 Kevin Bessell 8/27/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 228 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YE NDI UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 54 Equipment ID No. B/LT-911 Equip. Class4 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE LEVEL TRANSMITTER Photographs Note: Equipment.

Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 229 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE] U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 55 Equipment ID No. B/PT-913 Equip. Class, 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. CONT Floor El. 1002' Room, Area CONT 15WCC-3N'I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ N[i U[i N/All 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ N[I: UI- N/AL-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YX NEIl U[ N/A[-]anchors?1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 230 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI uIUI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 55 Equipment ID No. B/PT-913 Equip. Classw 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE PRESSURE TRANSMITTER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y-I N[l ULi N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ NE! UI-I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[ N[! UEi N/A[i 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N[-] Ul N/Al[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YO N[:] Ul! N/A[i 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE! U[--of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 231 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NErI UrI-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 55 Equipment ID No. B/PT-913 Equip. Class3 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NrI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Alex Smerch At-, Date: 8/27/12 Kevin Bessell /z,-----P1/'

8/27/12 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 232 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YN NE U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 55 Equipment ID No. B/PT-913 Equip. Class4 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR RC-2A WIDE RANGE PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Photographs Note: Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 233 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YE NDI UDýSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 56 Equipment ID No. A/PT-120 Equip. Classi 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC4 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. CONT Floor El. 1018' Room, Area CONT, 18WDD-12N'II Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI-- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[ ND] ULi N/A[D 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NDl UD- N/ADJ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YE NDJ UD-I N/AD-anchors?Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 234 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[Z NEIl U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 56 Equipment ID No. A/PT-120 Equip. Class2 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC-4 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[i N[i ULI N/A](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI U[I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ N[- UL- N/AL-YZ NEI U[] N/AL]YN NE] Ur] N/AL]Y[ N[l U[]0 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 235 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YE' NE] ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 56 Equipment ID No. NPT-120 Equip. Class3 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC-4 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NEi ULi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: John Kaofj V Alex Smerchf -'Date: 8/22/2012 8/22/2012 3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

EA12-021, Rev. 0 ATTACHMENT 11.2 PAGE 236 OF 404 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLIST FORM Sheet 4 of 4 Status: YZ Nil ULi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWC- 56 Equipment ID No. A/PT-120 Equip. Class4 18, INSTRUMENT RACKS Equipment Description PRESSURIZER RC-4 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Photographs 0 Note: 4 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.