LIC-02-0104, Omaha Public Power District Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Omaha Public Power District Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report
ML022540609
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 08/29/2002
From: Ridenoure R
Omaha Public Power District
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LIC-02-0104
Download: ML022540609 (4)


Text

/m m Omaha PublicPower DTstnct 444 South 16th Street Mall Omaha NE 68102-2247 August 29, 2002 LIC-02-0104 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Reference:

Docket No. 50-285

SUBJECT:

Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data Report In accordance with 10 CFR 26.71(d), attached please find the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) Fitness-for-Duty Program Performance Data for the six-month period from January 1 through June 30, 2002.

If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Richard Jaworski at (402) 533-6833.

Sincerely, I

Al c: E. W. Merschoff, NRC Regional Administrator, Region IV A. B. Wang, NRC Project Manager J. G. Kramer, NRC Senior Resident Inspector Winston & Strawn AO(-A Employment with Equal Opportunity 4171

1IC-02-0104 Attachment Page 1 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 Omaha Public Power District June 30, 2002 Company 6 Months Ending Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Station Location Colleen L. Burke (402) 636-3028 Contact Name Phone (include area code)

Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) Appendix A to 10 CFR 26 Marijuana 50/15 Amphetamines 1000/500 Benzodiazepines 300 /300 Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 /25 Opiates 300 / 300 Alcohol (% BAC) 0.04 LongTermShort-Term Long-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with 820 820 231 Unescorted Access Categories # Tested # Positive # Tested # Positive # Tested # Positive Pre-Access 86 0 314 2*

For Post Accident 0 0 0 0 Cause Observed 2 1 0 0 behavior Random 215 0 62 2 Follow-up 21 0 N/A NIA Other 3 0 0 0 Total 327 1 376 4*

  • 1 Refusal to test treated as a Positive.

REV. 1/92

LIC-02-0104 Attachment Page 2 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphe- Phency- Alcohol Refusal clidine tamines to Test Licensee 1 Employees Long-Term Contractors Short-Term 0*/1* 1 1 1 A Contractors Total 0"/1"* 4"/5"*I]

  • NRC Required Level

LIC-02-0104 Attachment Page 3 I. MANAGEMENT ACTIONS A. One (1) contractor employee tested positive during pre-access drug and alcohol testing.

This contractor employee originally attempted to submit a substituted specimen and was immediately retested. This individual tested positive on the immediate retest. OPPD terminated this contractor employee's services and referred the individual to the contractor company.

B. Two (2) contractor employees tested positive during random drug and alcohol testing. OPPD terminated their services and referred them to their respective contractor companies.

C. One (1) OPPD employee tested positive during for cause drug and alcohol testing. The employee complied with Employee Assistance Program (EAP) initial procedures, signed a Re-Entry Agreement and returned to work.

D. A non-licensed supervisory employee who was determined to be dependent on prescription medication, completed outpatient treatment and entered an aftercare program, signed a Re Entry Agreement and return to work. This was reported as an Event during the last reporting period.

E. A licensed employee's access was blocked during the previous reporting period at the recommendation of the MRO and he was placed on sick leave after he complained of anxiety, periodic insomnia, drowsiness, and double vision to EAP and EAP notified OPPD.

With the assistance of the MRO and other medical experts, the employee gradually withdrew from his prescription medication and was placed on a different medication. The MRO eventually released the employee to return to work in a safety-sensitive job, but not to the control room and recommended the employee be placed in a follow-up program to include a test for Benzodiazepines. Following consultation with the NRC, the employee was informed that he would be required to submit to testing for Benzodiazepines in addition to the standard 5-panel drug screen, sign a Re-Entry Agreement and participate in a follow-up testing program in order to return to work. The employee agreed to these requirements, "successfullycompleted a re-entry drug and alcohol test, signed a Re-Entry Agreement, and returned to work outside of the control room.

I1. EVENTS REPORTED A. Written notification was provided to the NRC within 60 days of OPPD initiating testing of one individual for Benzodiazepines in addition to the 5-panel drug screen. The decision to add the test for Benzodiazepines for the individual was made in conjunction with the advice of the MRO.