Text

Post-Flooding Recovery Action Plan
	ML112231755
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	08/10/2011
From:	Reinhart J; Omaha Public Power District
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	LIC-11-0090
	Download: ML112231755 (113)
	v • d • e

-- -

Omaha Pulllie POWf1r District 444 South 16th Street Mall br.naha,lVE 68102-2247 August 10, 2011 LI C-11-0090 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

References:

1. Docket No. 50-285

2. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting, July 27,2011

SUBJECT:

Fort Calhoun Station Post-Flooding Recovery Action Plan Due to Missouri river flooding, Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) entered a Notice of Unusual Event (NOUE) on June 6, 2011, as required by station procedures. Since April 9, 2011, FCS has been shutdown for a refueling outage and will remain shutdown until the Missouri river recedes to a safe level and site conditions allow for restart.

In the Reference 2 public meeting, OPPD provided information concerning current FCS site conditions, flooding action levels, on-going flood response, post-flooding recovery actions, and the OPPD commitment to safety. Additionally, in the Reference 2 meeting, OPPD committed to submit a detailed FCS flooding recovery action plan. The attached FCS post-flooding recovery action plan provides for extensive reviews of plant systems, structures, and components (SSCs) to assess the impact of the flood waters.

OPPD understands that selected actions in the attached plan will be included in a Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) that must be satisfactorily completed prior to FCS plant restart. Therefore, this letter contains no commitments; the commitments will be described in the CAL.

OPPD is committed to the safe operation of FCS and will not ascend in mode without concurrence from the NRC that applicable commitments have been satisfied.

The attached FCS flooding recovery action plan is intended to be a living document and will be updated and re-submitted periodically as necessary. The Security recovery action plan will be submitted under separate cover.

JAR/rmc Enclosure Employment with Equal Opportunity

Enclosure LIC-11-0090 Page 1 FLOODING RECOVERY ACTION PLAN REVISION 0 Employment with Equal Opportunity

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION FLOODING RECOVERY ACTION PLAN REVISION 0 AUGUST 10, 2011

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 Revision Log Revision Date Description 0 8/10/11 Initial issuance Page 2 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 Table of Contents Section 1 Recovery Plan Overview Section 2 Assessment and Restoration Focus Areas Section 3 Action Plan Summary Section 4 Internal and External Oversight Appendix A Flooding Recovery Action Plans Page 3 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011

1. RECOVERY PLAN OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION The Missouri River flooding experienced at Fort Calhoun Station during the summer of 2011 has significantly challenged plant operation and has resulted in the station remaining shutdown since April 9, 2011, when the unit was removed from service for the start of the 2011 refueling outage. Throughout the flooding, OPPD has ensured that Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) continues to be operated in a manner that protects the public health and safety. OPPD is fully committed to ensuring that public health and safety is assured when FCS is returned to power operations.

In response to this unprecedented flooding event, OPPD is undertaking comprehensive, aggressive actions to fully scope, and then correct, the extent of flooding impact at FCS, beginning with comprehensive assessments of systems, structures and components (SSC) and continuing with detailed plans for repair and restoration. This document, the FCS Flooding Recovery Plan, provides detailed plans and actions regarding the structure, content and methods for these restart actions.

The FCS Flooding Recovery Plan is organized as follows:

Section 1 - Recovery Plan Overview Section 2 - Assessment and Restoration Focus Areas Section 3 - Action Plan Summary Section 4 - Internal and External Oversight Appendix A - Flooding Recovery Action Plans PURPOSE The purpose of the Flooding Recovery Plan (FRP) is to provide a roadmap for successful restart of Fort Calhoun Station. The FRP aligns OPPD, the FCS organization, and key oversight organizations toward the common goal of returning FCS to safe, eventfree nuclear generation of electricity for OPPD. The FRP identifies specific focus areas that shall be addressed now and in the future. The FRP provides action plans, and the associated action steps, required to achieve plant restart and support continued safe operation following return to power operations.

ASSESSMENT AND RESTORATION FOCUS AREAS As explained above, the FRP sets forth the actions that must be completed to allow plant restart and support continued safe operation. The objectives for the focus areas are characterized by the following statements:

Assessment of SSCs impacted or potentially impacted by flooding to verify operability or functionality; Page 4 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 Assessment of emergency preparedness to verify that the onsite and offsite emergency response infrastructure has been restored; Assessment of the current configuration of the physical protection system; Restoration of facilities and equipment to preflooding conditions; Identification of SSCs that must be monitored longterm for degradation; Evaluation of the effects of the flooding event on the station design and licensing basis; Incorporation of lessons learned into station procedures.

These objectives are broad in scope and form the foundation for comprehensive evaluation of the impact of this flooding event. The focus area objectives have been translated into six focus areas for development of action plans:

Site Restoration Plant Systems and Equipment Equipment Reliability Design and Licensing Basis Emergency Planning Security The focus areas are discussed and defined in more detail in Section 2.

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The FCS Emergency Preparedness program and emergency response capability has been maintained throughout the flooding event to assure protection of the health and safety of the public. Recognizing that the emergency response infrastructure may have been damaged by the flooding, OPPD will assess the capabilities of both the onsite and off site emergency response facilities and organizations in the sites 10mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) to respond to site emergencies. OPPD will also assist the state emergency management organizations in Iowa and Nebraska with preparation of their required assessments of the infrastructure associated with the radiological emergency preparedness program. OPPD will assist the states in drafting a letter of certification that is submitted to FEMA stating that the offsite emergency response organizations are capable of responding to a radiological emergency.

PHYSICAL SECURITY Throughout the flooding event, OPPD has maintained physical security measures in accordance with the Security Plan. However, because of the flooding, some security systems and equipment have been removed from service. A security system damage Page 5 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 assessment and restoration plan has been included in the FRP and OPPD fully intends to restore the outofservice equipment prior to plant restart. If circumstances prevent full restoration of the physical security protection, OPPD will use compensatory measures as allowed by the Security Plan. Prior to plant restart, OPPD will conduct an assessment of the current configuration of the physical protection system to verify the security protective strategy meets the objective of providing high assurance that activities involving special nuclear material are not inimical to the common defense and security and do not constitute an unreasonable risk to the public health and safety. This assessment will include local law enforcement and emergency response organizations to verify that their response capability for a security event has not been adversely impacted.

2011 REFUELING OUTAGE COMPLETION Restart of FCS requires completion of the 2011 refueling outage. The detailed scope and schedule for outage completion are not included in the FRP. However, several major milestones are included in the associated action plan. Outage activities were suspended immediately after reactor core reload and upper guide structure installation, prior to the next major activity, which is Engineered Safety Features testing. The schedule has been developed for restarting outage activities based on river level projections from the US Army Corps of Engineers. However, that schedule will remain flexible due to the uncertainty of site conditions as the flood waters recede.

RESTART ISSUES IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING The FCS Corrective Action Program (CAP) is a comprehensive process for identifying, evaluating and correcting problems. While the FRP will be used to track the focus area action plans and action steps, the CAP will be used to track and resolve nonconforming and degraded conditions identified during plant assessments and inspections. Station personnel recognize the importance of identifying, reporting, and correcting problems via the CAP on a continuing basis. The CAP will be used as directed by applicable station procedures and issues will be classified regarding significance and priority in accordance with those procedures.

A separate Flooding Recovery Issues List be developed and maintained to track the status of floodingrelated issues that must be resolved prior to plant restart. Issues will be identified through routine review of Condition Reports generated since the onset of flooding. Where appropriate, those issues will be added to the Plant Review Committee (PRC) Startup List, included in the FRP and/or added to the 2011 RFO scope.

Page 6 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Flooding Recovery Action Plans For each action on the Flooding Recovery Action Plans, closure packages will be developed to summarize the actions taken to address the issue and complete the deliverable identified in the action plan. The result will be an easytoreview document summarizing the actions taken and describing the results achieved by implementation of the action plan.

Flooding Recovery Issues List Closure of items on the Flooding Recovery Issues List will be documented using existing permanent plant processes. Those will primarily include the CAP, the Maintenance Work Control Process and the Surveillance Testing Process. The Flooding Recovery Issues List will be maintained as a current and convenient reference for verification by the Plant Review Committee that all issues have been addressed prior to plant restart.

Plant Restart Readiness Verification Verification of readiness for plant restart will occur in accordance with Operating Procedure OP1 Master Checklist for Plant Startup. That procedure includes:

System Alignment Verification Open Degraded and Nonconforming Item Review OffSite Emergency Preparedness Verification Startup Surveillance Testing Verification Temporary Modification Review Safety Analysis For Operability Review Annunciator Status Verification Clearance Status Review Post Maintenance Testing Verification Locked Component Verification Containment Integrity Verification Page 7 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011

2. ASSESSMENT AND RESTORATION FOCUS AREAS

SUMMARY

OF FOCUS AREAS An important step in developing the FRP was to identify and understand the scope of the assessment and restoration activities that will be required. Most of the site is still covered by flood waters and evaluation of the flooding impact on the plant has, in general, not yet been possible. Development of the FRP emphasized a broad and comprehensive approach to short term and long term assessment of flooding impact on plant systems, structures and components. As a result, FCS has identified six focus areas. Each focus area has been assigned to a station manager as the Focus Area Owner and each focus area has one or more associated action plans with Action Plan Owners.

The process requires that each action plan includes an Issue Definition and Objective to clearly define the scope and expected results for each action plan. Action steps, due dates and deliverables are included each action in the action plans. As a summary overview, the following paragraphs identify the six focus areas and provide a brief characterization of scope of each focus area. Details regarding specific objectives and actions are contained in the FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plans in Appendix A.

FOCUS AREAS & OWNERS Site Restoration - Greg Roets, Manager - Major Projects Includes all activities to remove flooding protection and equipment from the site, restore facilities and equipment with known damage and restore equipment that was moved offsite for protection from flooding. Although not directly related to flooding, repairs to 480VAC bus 1B4A are also included in this focus area.

Plant Systems and Equipment - Kevin Naser, Manager - System Engineering Includes assessment of the condition of plant systems and equipment to determine what, if any, damage has occurred and identify actions necessary to restore the equipment to operable or functional status.

Long Term Equipment Reliability - Mark Frans, Manager - Engineering Programs Includes assessing the condition and reliability of station equipment that may have been impacted by flooding conditions but has not failed. This will include both short term and long term assessment and monitoring.

Page 8 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 Design and Licensing Basis - Steve Miller, Manager - Design Engineering Includes all activities to verify that Fort Calhoun Station is in compliance with the NRC approved design and licensing basis and determine if changes to the licensing basis are required due to changes in the frequency or magnitude of an external flooding event.

Emergency Planning - Steve Gebers, Manager - Emergency Planning, Health Physics and Administrative Services Includes assessing the capabilities of both the onsite and offsite emergency response facilities and organizations in the sites 10mile emergency planning zone (EPZ) to respond to site emergencies and restoration of those facilities where required. Also includes identifying lessons learned from the external flooding event and incorporating those lessons into station procedures.

Security - Al Clark, Manager Security Includes assessment of security system damage and restoration of damaged equipment.

Also includes verifying the response capability of local law enforcement and emergency response organizations for a security event has not been adversely impacted.

3. ACTION PLAN

SUMMARY

ACTION PLAN FORMAT AND CONTENT The FRP action plans are the primary tool for documenting and tracking flooding recovery progress and issue closure. The action plans have defined owners with clear and concise issue definitions and objectives. The actions are assigned to individuals and have start and end dates and expected deliverables.

Oversight processes and practices will be used to oversee and monitor implementation and closure of each action plan to ensure readiness for plant restart. Section 4.0 provides additional details on the management oversight and monitoring practices that will be used to monitor execution of the FRP.

LIST OF ACTION PLANS The twenty FRP action plans are grouped by focus area as shown below. This is the current list of action plans. During assessment activities, it is possible that additional action plans will be identified for development.

1. Site Restoration - Greg Roets, Manager - Major Projects 1.1. Flooding Protection and Equipment Demobilization 1.2. Plant and Facility Restoration Page 9 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 1.3. Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions 1.4. 13.8 kV Underground Distribution Damage Assessment and Restoration

2. Plant Systems and Equipment - Kevin Naser, Manager - System Engineering 2.1. Station Fire Protection System Damage Assessment and Restoration 2.2. System Health Assessments 2.3. Wetted Motor Damage Assessment and Restoration

3. Long Term Equipment Reliability - Mark Frans, Manager - Engineering Programs 3.1. Engineering Program Reviews 3.2. Underground Cable Assessment 3.3. Underground Piping and Tanks Assessment 3.4. I&C Power Supply Service Life Assessment

4. Design and Licensing Basis - Steve Miller, Manager - Design Engineering 4.1. Plant and Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment 4.2. External Flooding Barrier Configuration 4.3. Plant Design Configuration Control 4.4. External Flooding Design Basis Review

5. Emergency Planning - Steve Gebers, Manager - Emergency Planning, Health Physics and Administrative Services 5.1. Return Alert Notification Sirens To Functional Status 5.2. Field Monitoring and Post Accident Environmental Monitoring 5.3. Assessment of Offsite Emergency Response Following a Natural Disaster 5.4. Onsite Facility and Equipment Restoration

6. Security - Al Clark, Manager Security 6.1. Security System Damage Assessment and Restoration ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES The focus area owner is responsible for the overall implementation of their action plans and will review all completed action plans for closure following completion. Each action plan step has a specific individual who has been assigned responsibility for its implementation. Responsibilities of these individuals are summarized below:

The Action Step Owner is responsible for completing the assigned action step by the specified completion date; Page 10 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 The Action Plan Owner is responsible for ensuring the ontime completion of all action steps, as approved; The Focus Area Owner is responsible for ensuring ontime and effective implementation and completion of all action plans in the assigned focus area.

ACTION PLAN SCHEDULING AND TRACKING The actions outlined in the FRP will be included in an integrated project schedule. The action plan owners are responsible for updating the project schedule on a weekly basis.

ACTION PLAN CLOSURE PROCESS The closure process for the action steps and action plans are summarized in the following paragraphs.

ACTION STEP CLOSURE The closure of each action step in an action plan will require a closure report using a standard closure format. The action plan owner and the focus area owner will be responsible for ensuring that the completion of an action step is documented and preparing the closure report package. An independent review of the action steps closure documentation will also performed.

ACTION PLAN CLOSURE Following completion of the action steps in an action plan, the Action Plan Owner and the Focus Area Owner will review the action plan for closure. A final closure report will be prepared which documents justification for closure of the action plan. The package will then be reviewed and signed by the Action Plan Owner and Focus Area Owner.

ACTION PLAN REVISIONS Revisions to due dates on an action plan will be managed by the Action Plan Owner.

Revisions that affect the scope, intent, or basis for previously approved revisions (e.g.,

deletion of actions or addition of actions) require review and approval by the Action Plan Owner and the Focus Area Owner. Changes other than dates will require a change to the revision number and date of the action plan. Revisions that may impact NRC commitments will be reviewed by Licensing to evaluate the potential commitment impact and any changes to commitments will be approved by the Site Vice President.

Page 11 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011

4. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL OVERSIGHT FCS management is responsible for monitoring progress in accomplishing the FRP and is accountable for the overall implementation of the FRP. Management oversight will be accomplished through review meetings and oversight activities as described in the following paragraphs:

FRP PROGRESS REVIEW MEETINGS Overall progress toward completing FRP action plans will be reviewed every two weeks in a regularly scheduled FRP Progress Review Meeting. This meeting will be chaired by the Site Vice President and will be attended the Division Managers and the Focus Area Owners. The purpose of the meeting will be to review the completion progress of the FRP action plans and to hold the Focus Area Owners accountable for their progress in completing the FRP.

OPPD SENIOR MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT The Vice PresidentNuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer will report FRP progress to the OPPD President and CEO and the OPPD Board Nuclear Oversight Subcommittee on a monthly basis.

INDUSTRY OVERSIGHT The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations will conduct a review visit at Fort Calhoun Station in September 2011 to provide an industry perspective on the stations readiness for power operations. INPO conducts review visits in selected areas to supplement the evaluation, accreditation, and events analysis programs. Review visits are separate and distinct from assistance visits in that they are initiated by INPO and are evaluative in nature. Any INPO recommendations that identify conditions adverse to quality will be documented in the CAP as required by Standing Order R2, Condition Reporting and Corrective Action, and will be tracked on the Flooding Recovery Issues List.

INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENTS Quality Assurance (QA) has developed a plan for oversight of activities associated with the FRP. This plan contains guidance for performing QA evaluations of FRP activities and action plans. Specifically, the plan ensures that QA activities are documented and performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists to verify, by examination and evaluation of evidence, that applicable elements of the FRP have been developed, planned, effectively implemented and appropriately documented. During these evaluations, QA will use existing processes for oversight of and for response to emergent issues. QA will provide periodic reports to the Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) and FCS management regarding progress and quality of FRP activities. Any QA findings that identify conditions adverse to quality will be documented in the CAP as required by Page 12 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 Standing Order R2, Condition Reporting and Corrective Action, and will be tracked on the Flooding Recovery Issues List.

INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT - SAFETY AUDIT AND REVIEW COMMITTTEE The Safety Audit and Review Committee (SARC) reports to and advises the Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer on matters affecting nuclear safety. During the flooding event, the SARC has provided ongoing oversight of activities associated with station operation and provided periodic reports to the CNO. During the next regularly scheduled meeting of the SARC in September 2011, the SARC will conduct a review of the FRP and the associated action plan closure packages and provide recommendations regarding readiness for power operations to the CNO. Any SARC recommendations that identify conditions adverse to quality will be documented in the CAP as required by Standing Order R2, Condition Reporting and Corrective Action, and will be tracked on the Flooding Recovery Issues List.

Page 13 of 14

Fort Calhoun Station Flooding Recovery Plan Revision 0 - August 10, 2011 APPENDIX A - FLOODING RECOVERY ACTION PLANS Page 14 of 14

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.1 Flooding Protection and Equipment Demobilization FOCUS AREA: Site Restoration ACTION PLAN: Flooding Protection and Equipment Demobilization ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 1.1 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Greg Roets ACTION PLAN OWNER: John Brandeau ISSUE DEFINITION:

Temporary flood protection barriers and equipment were installed prior to the flooding event OBJECTIVE:

Remove temporary flood protection barriers and equipment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Remove AOP-1 floodgates Maintenance Uehling 8/22/2011 AOP-1 floodgates removed and stored and store

2. Remove temporary diesel, Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 Temporary diesel, fuel tankers/tanks and fuel tankers/tanks and transformers removed transformer from Protected Area

3. Remove the Aqua Dams Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 Aqua dam removed from the Protected Area

4. Remove flood protection Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Flood protection removed around Security Building

5. Remove pumps and hoses Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Pumps and hoses removed from Security building Page 1 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.1 Flooding Protection and Equipment Demobilization Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

6. Remove sandbags from Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Sandbags removed turbine building Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Determine where OPPD will Construction Brandeau 8/1/2011 8/5/2011 Storage location determined store purchased flood (complete) protection equipment

2. Return all flood protection Construction Brandeau 8/5/2011 11/30/2011 Flood protection rental rental equipment to equipment returned vendors

3. Remove Aqua Dam Construction Brandeau 8/10/2011 8/25/2011 Aqua dam removed around training center

4. Remove fuel cans, empty Construction Brandeau 8/15/2011 10/30/2011 Fuel cans removed, emptied and store as company and stored assets

5. Remove pumps and FME Construction Brandeau 8/15/2011 8/26/2011 Pumps and FME removed around training center

6. Remove scaffold bridges Construction Brandeau 8/18/2011 9/1/2011 Scaffold bridges removed around training center Page 2 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.1 Flooding Protection and Equipment Demobilization Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

7. Dewater and remove all Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 8/26/2011 Aqua dam removed Aqua Berms around the Admin Building

8. Remove all pumps and Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 8/26/2011 Pumps and hoses removed hoses from around Admin Building

9. Remove iron bridge to the Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 8/26/2011 Bridge removed front entrance of Admin Building

10. Remove sandbags and Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 9/2/2011 Sandbags and Hesco barriers Hesco barriers around removed Admin Building

11. Remove flood materials Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 9/23/2011 Training Center grounds and debris on the grounds cleaned of the training center

12. Gather, clean and store Construction Brandeau 9/1/2011 12/31/2011 Equipment gathered, cleaned purchased flood control and stored equipment (waders, life jackets, boots, rain gear, etc.)

13. Remove the aqua dam Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/23/2011 Aqua dam removed from the old warehouse

14. Remove Hesco Barriers Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/23/2011 Hesco barriers and pumps and pumps from the removed Training Center chiller

15. Remove elevated Construction Brandeau 8/5/2011 9/26/2011 Walkways removed and walkways and store scaffold stored scaffold material

16. Remove sandbags from Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Sandbags removed intake structure Page 3 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.1 Flooding Protection and Equipment Demobilization Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

17. Remove sandbags and Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 10/5/2011 Sandbags and Hesco barriers Hesco barriers at south removed transformer of new warehouse

18. Remove sandbags in new Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 10/5/2011 Sandbags removed warehouse Page 4 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration FOCUS AREA: Site Restoration ACTION PLAN: Plant and Facility Restoration ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 1.2 COMPLETION DATE: 10/30/2012 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Greg Roets ACTION PLAN OWNER: John Brandeau ISSUE DEFINITION:

Site structures and facilities may have been damaged by flooding OBJECTIVE:

Repair flood-related damage to site facilities and structures Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Determine if equipment in System Naser 8/26/2011 Evaluation report the intake structure and Engineering cells has been damaged

2. Determine if intake cell System Naser 8/22/2011 Evaluation report cleaning is required Engineering

3. Repair any structural Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Repairs completed damage identified in the intake structure

4. Return B.5.b materials to Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Equipment returned to proper location proper location

5. Correct any structural Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Repairs completed damage that is identified in Turbine Building Page 1 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Repair damage to the ISFSI Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Repairs completed Mux building

2. Inspect and replace Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Repairs completed caulking between the concrete barriers as necessary Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Clean intake structure Construction Brandeau 8/15/2011 10/15/2011 Clean up complete building as needed

2. Determine if any Chemistry Kingston 8/15/2011 10/15/2011 Mitigation complete biohazards exist in CARP Bldg; mitigate as required

3. Determine if any Chemistry Kingston 8/15/2011 9/30/2011 Biohazards identified and biohazards exist in intake resolved structure and resolve

4. Determine if any Chemistry Kingston 8/15/2011 10/1/2011 Biohazards identified and biohazards exist in resolved Protected Area fab shop and resolve

5. Determine if any Chemistry Kingston 8/15/2011 9/30/2011 Biohazards identified and Biohazards exist in resolved Radioactive Waste building and take corrective actions

6. Determine if there are any Chemistry Kingston 8/15/2011 11/30/2011 Environmental issues resolved environmental issues in common areas and resolve Page 2 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

7. Dismantle all scaffold Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Scaffold removed walkways in Protected Area and store as required

8. Inspect for biohazards in Chemistry Kingston 8/15/2011 9/22/2011 Biohazards identified and the Security Building, corrected remediate as necessary

9. Recover stored equipment Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Equipment returned to site from Blair substation to FCS site

10. Remove any flood Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Materials removed protection materials from storm drains

11. Remove debris around Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/23/2011 Debris removed DW-68 storage tank and utility building

12. Remove temporary berms Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Temporary berms removed around A/C units and transformers in Protected Area

13. Restore configuration of Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Configuration restored Protected Area - HazStor building, insulator shed

14. Check for biohazards in Chemistry Kingston 9/22/2011 10/22/2011 Clean up complete Chem Storage building and initiate clean up if necessary

15. Clean Protected Area fab Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 10/1/2011 Clean up complete shop as required

16. Restore equipment to Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 9/30/2011 Equipment restored Security Building that was removed during flooding Page 3 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

17. Restore concrete barriers Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 9/30/2011 Repairs completed inside the Protected Area to the previous locations

18. Return security and RP Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 10/30/2011 Equipment restored equipment to the security building

19. Inspect tank and System Naser 9/15/2011 9/22/2011 Inspection report equipment on DI tank for Engineering damage

20. Replace carpet tiles in Facilities Borcyk 8/5/2011 9/15/2011 Carpet replaced Training Center auditorium

21. Replace carpeting in the Facilities Borcyk 8/5/2011 9/15/2011 Carpet replaced, remediation OPS NRC Exam room, complete check for mold and remediate mold

22. Replace desks and tables Facilities Ferguson 8/5/2011 9/15/2011 Desks and tables replaced in the NRC Exam Room/Storage Area

23. Evaluate material stored in Material Nicholas 8/15/2011 10/15/2011 Material evaluated the warehouse for shelf-life Management

24. Clean and inspect Admin Facilities Borcyk 8/18/2011 8/31/2011 Inspection and cleaning building interior for mold complete and insects

25. Clean and inspect Training Facilities Borcyk 8/18/2011 8/31/2011 Inspection and cleaning Center interior for mold complete and insects

26. Unplug drains in the Facilities Koziel 8/18/2011 8/30/2011 Drains restored Training Center atrium and simulator Page 4 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

27. As water recedes Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 9/9/2011 Evaluation report determine the extent of damage to each trailer

28. Pump out pockets of water Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 10/30/2011 Water pumped out that are pooled on grounds

29. Remove items stored along Construction Brandeau 8/22/2011 11/30/2011 Items removed the access road

30. Resolve environmental Facilities Borcyk 8/22/2011 9/15/2011 Environmental issues resolved issues in Training Center

31. Determine the need for Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 9/16/2011 Assessment completed replacement of trailers on a case-by-case basis

32. Discuss with trailer rental Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 9/16/2011 Decision whether to purchase vendor the purchase of temporary trailers temporary trailers

33. Establish rental contracts Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 9/30/2011 Contracts in place for needed trailers

34. Evaluate if each trailer is Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 9/15/2011 Assessment completed worth salvaging or needs to be scrapped

35. Evaluate, repair and clean Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 9/15/2011 Clean up complete RP training trailer

36. If temporary trailers are Construction Brandeau 8/26/2011 9/30/2011 Repairs completed salvageable, complete required repairs

37. Inspect RP training trailer Facilities Borcyk 8/26/2011 9/15/2011 Inspection completed interior for mold and insects Page 5 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

38. Remove temporary pump Facilities Koziel 8/26/2011 9/2/2011 Restored to normal and restore south lift station configuration to normal configuration

39. Repair damaged sidewalks Construction Brandeau 8/30/2011 4/30/2012 Repairs completed and gratings

40. Tritium groundwater Chemistry Kingston 9/1/2011 10/30/11 Flood-related sampling sampling complete

41. Determine the amount of Construction Brandeau 9/1/2011 10/30/2011 Assessment completed damage to trees, grass, and other landscaping

42. Repaint surfaces and Construction Brandeau 9/3/2011 4/30/2012 Painting complete structures exposed to flood waters as necessary

43. Clean maintenance Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 10/15/2011 Clean up complete storage building as required

44. Clean removed flood Construction Maurer 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Scaffold cleaned, oiled and access scaffold; oil hinges stored and knuckles

45. Determine if any Chemistry Kingston 9/15/2011 9/22/2011 Hazards identified and resolved biohazards exist in maintenance storage building and resolve

46. Determine if any regulatory Chemistry Kingston 9/15/2011 10/1/2011 Evaluation report requirements need to be addressed for sewage discharge

47. Ensure any biohazards Chemistry Kingston 9/15/2011 10/15/2011 Biohazards identified and have been addressed for corrected sewage discharge system Page 6 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

48. Inspect all equipment in System Naser 9/15/2011 9/22/2011 Inspection report the DW-68 tank utility Engineering building

49. Inspect materials in Maintenance Uehling 9/15/2011 12/30/2011 Materials inspected and Maintenance Storage dispositioned building for flood damage and discard appropriately

50. Inspect materials in Maintenance Uehling 9/15/2011 10/30/2011 Materials inspected and Protected Area fab shop dispositioned for flood damage and discard appropriately

51. Inspect warehouse Material Nicholas 9/15/2011 12/30/2011 Inspection complete laydown for damaged Management material, identify material for disposal

52. Remove equipment from Maintenance Uehling 9/15/2011 12/30/2011 Items restored to normal turbine deck and restore to location original location

53. Remove trailers from Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Trailers removed Protected Area and other areas and move to upper parking lot once lower lots can be opened.

54. Repair damage to 6 bay Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Repairs completed garage

55. Repair ISFSI as necessary Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 11/30/2011 Repairs completed

56. Repair or replace B.5.b Training Anielak 9/15/2011 11/1/2011 Repairs or replacement equipment as necessary completed

57. Repair sewage lagoons Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 11/15/2011 Repairs completed and lift stations as required Page 7 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

58. Restore trash compactors Facilities Ferguson 9/15/2011 9/30/2011 Trash compactors restored

59. Clean and inspect the Facilities Koziel 9/22/2011 10/15/2011 Inspection and cleaning Training Center cooling complete tower

60. Clean Protected area yard Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 10/15/2011 Clean up complete

- remove water stains from buildings, algae, sludge, grade/level the grounds

61. Evaluate condition of fuel System Naser 9/22/2011 10/15/2011 Repair, replacement or tank at sally port inside Engineering removal complete Protected Area and repair, replace or remove as required

62. Evaluate whether the old Construction Roets 9/22/2011 9/30/2011 Evaluation report warehouse should be torn down and replace or restored.

63. Put recovered equipment Maintenance Uehling 9/22/2011 12/31/2011 Equipment back in place from Blair substation back in place

64. Remove dead trees and Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 4/30/2012 Trees and bushes removed bushes as necessary

65. Repair damage to DW-68 Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 11/15/2011 Repairs completed tank and utility building

66. Repair Security building as Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 12/30/2011 Repairs completed required

67. Restore fences in T&D Lester 9/22/2011 12/30/2011 Fences restored switchyard

68. Assess and repair damage Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 6/30/2012 Boat house repaired to the boat house Page 8 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

69. Clean up and restore old Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 4/15/2012 Clean up complete warehouse if it will be kept

70. Mow grounds and spray Facilities Koziel 9/30/2011 10/30/2011 Yard maintenance completed weeds prior to winter

71. Remove debris at burn Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 11/30/2011 Area restored pad and restore area

72. Remove equipment and Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 12/30/2011 Equipment removed, area material from ACP area, restored restore area

73. Remove sea vans from Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 12/30/2011 Seavans removed inside the switchyard berm

74. Repair discovered Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 11/30/2011 Repairs completed geotechnical problems in common areas outside the Protected Area

75. Repair structural or Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 10/30/2011 Repairs completed geotechnical deficiencies in CARP building

76. Repair structural or Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 11/15/2011 Repairs completed geotechnical deficiencies in Chemistry Storage building

77. Repair the ISFSI haul route Construction Brandeau 9/30/2011 5/1/2012 Repairs completed as necessary

78. Determine required Facilities Koziel 10/1/2011 5/1/2012 Assessment completed landscaping replacement

79. Excavate and repair Construction Brandeau 10/30/2011 11/30/2011 Ditches excavated and drainage ditches as repaired necessary

80. ISFSI haul route load test Engineering Hutchinson 3/15/2012 10/1/2012 Load test complete Programs Page 9 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.2 Plant and Facility Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

81. Replant landscaping in Facilities Koziel 3/15/2012 10/30/2012 Landscaping replaced OCA

82. Repave the DeSoto marker Construction Brandeau 4/1/2012 6/30/2012 Area repaved turnout at top of hill Page 10 of 10 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.3 Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions FOCUS AREA: Site Restoration ACTION PLAN: Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 1.3 COMPLETION DATE: 8/30/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Greg Roets ACTION PLAN OWNER: Merl Core ISSUE DEFINITION:

A fire that occurred on June 7, 2011, rendered bus 1B4A inoperable. In addition, cables in the cable tray immediately above 1B4A were damaged by heat. Fire by-products and Halon discharge into the switchgear room has left many pieces of equipment coated with debris and they must be properly cleaned or otherwise dispositioned.

OBJECTIVE:

Restore bus 1B4A to an operable status within design basis. Correct any identified extent of condition associated with the fire Root Cause Analysis. Restore all affected cables to operable condition within design basis. Assure the equipment and the switchgear room, itself, is returned to an acceptably clean condition.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Rebuild the 1B4A load NLI Core 7/20/2011 Completely refurbished load center that has center been modified to accept Square D circuit breakers (replace the aluminum bus with a copper, bolted bus)

2. Provide documentation for NLI Core 7/20/2011 The vendor, NLI, is rebuilding the load center the dedication of the under their QA program. Before the plant rebuilt load center in accepts the load center from NLI, appropriate accordance with Contract dedication documentation must be provided 163495 Page 1 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.3 Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

3. Complete EC 53257 and DEN Sterba 6/9/2011 A completed and PRC approved Engineering obtain PRC approval to Change must be issued before the 1B4A bus authorize the use of the may be declared operable rebuild load center, 1B4A

4. Test all cables that Construction Woockman 7/20/2011 A listing of cables that must be repaired or terminate in 1B4A load replaced for load center 1B4A - Completed center

5. Repair or replace Construction Woockman 8/5/2011 All cables that service the 1B4A load center defective cables are capable of meeting their operational and terminating in 1B4A load design basis requirements center

6. Perform testing on the Construction Findlay 7/25/2011 Report from EPRI that provides conclusions to insulation of the cables the health of the insulation of the subject that were potentially cables - Completed impacted by the fire located in the cable tray above 1B4A load center using EPRI technology.

7. Complete Engineering DEN Sterba 7/25/2011 An Engineering Change that directs actions Change (53517) that required to repair cable jackets and cable details the repair to the tray sections to assure the cables meet design cable jackets for cables requirements located in the cable tray above the 1B4A load center.

8. Repair or replace the Construction Findlay 7/25/2011 Return damaged cables to meet Fort Calhoun cables located in the design basis criteria. Additionally, return the cable tray above load cable tray to a condition that meets the FCS center 1B4A that have had design basis jacket damage Page 2 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.3 Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

9. Witness Factory Construction Rosloniec 8/8/2011 Verification that the Square D replacement Acceptance Testing (FAT) breakers will meet the requirements for the of the new Square D circuit rebuilt load center breakers that will be used in the 1B4A load center to replace the existing AK-25 breakers and the two Square D input and bus tie breakers

10. Calibration of the internal Metering Core 8/23/2011 Calibrated equipment internal to the 1B4A bus relays and protection will be calibrated to the requirements of the equipment for bus 1B4A individual calibration procedures and ready to provide required protection and control of plant equipment

11. Install new 4160 to 480 volt Maintenance Woockman 8/16/2011 A new transformer will be installed that will be transformer T1B4A available to power the 1B4A bus when required

12. Calibrate new Square D Maintenance Barna 8/10/2011 New breakers will be calibrated to Fort circuit breakers Calhoun calibration procedures and available to install in the load center

13. Determine the method System Kalra 6/24/2011 Technical requirements for cleaning and extent of cleaning Engineering equipment located in the switchgear room as required in the switchgear well as writing maintenance work requests to room to return the accomplish the work equipment to pre-fire conditions and acceptable for power operation.

Page 3 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.3 Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

14. Clean equipment in the Maintenance Barna 8/8/2011 Return of the equipment located in the switchgear room that has switchgear room to pre-fire conditions as been coated with by- required by the technical requirements products from the fire supplied by System Engineering

15. Provide any required DEN Sterba 8/10/2011 If required, due to necessary repairs to the Engineering Change for non-segregated bus, appropriate engineering the non-segregated bus paperwork that authorizes the new or between 1B4A and 1B3A- refurbished bus installation. Note: at this time, 4A it is not yet known if there will be any engineering change required

16. Repair 1B4A to 1B3A-4A NLI Woockman 8/15/2011 The bus between 1B4A and 1B3A-4A is non-segregated bus replaced either with new bus or repaired bus section that was removed

17. Perform testing of all Construction Ellis 8/19/2011 Completed testing that demonstrates the circuits associated with external cables and internal wiring of the 1B4A 1B4A load center load center have been properly re-terminated

18. Perform testing of all Construction Findlay 8/12/2011 Completed testing that demonstrates that all circuits associated with cables located in the tray above the 1B4A cabling not associated load center have been properly re-terminated with the 1B4A load center (i.e. cables located in the cable tray above the load center)

19. Submit, track, and seek System Kalra 8/25/2011 Approved procedures that are required for approval of procedures Engineering System Acceptance of Engineering Change that are changed as the 53257 are complete result of EC 53257 and are required to be issued before the System Acceptance Process.

Page 4 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.3 Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

20. Prepare Acceptance Construction Woockman 8/26/2011 System Acceptance for forms Operability forms are completed and ready for Operations, Engineering, and Maintenance to accept the work that was performed on 1B4A load center

21. Declare bus 1B4A Operations Smith 8/30/2011 Operations Department has Operable declared the bus operable and it has been placed in service. No outstanding holds for operation exist

22. Temporary Modification Maintenance Barna 8/25/2011 All temporary modifications restoration that have been installed after the fire event have been restored to normal conditions and the operational requirements and design basis are met with normal equipment control and power feeds

23. Extent of Condition repair System Clayton 8/10/2011 The requirements for any requirements. At this time, Engineering repairs/refurbishments/

the extent of condition is adjustments that dictated by not fully known. Provide the Root Cause Analysis extent repair requirements for of condition.

extent of condition.

Page 5 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.3 Bus 1B4A Restoration and Extent of Condition Actions Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

24. Implement the Maintenance Barna 8/15/2011 Repair or adjustment of items required by the requirements supplied by extent of condition. As a minimum, the bus System Engineering stabs will be cleaned to remove built up regarding the extent of lubricant. Additional items may be specified condition. At this time it is by System Engineering.

known that the minimum required for the extent of condition will be to clean the bus stabs for the main and bus tie breakers for five load centers (1B4A not required due to new bus)

Additional actions may be required.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 6 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.4 13.8 kV Underground Distribution Damage Assessment and Restoration FOCUS AREA: Site Restoration ACTION PLAN: 13.8 kV Underground Distribution Damage Assessment and Restoration ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 1.4 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Greg Roets ACTION PLAN OWNER: Robert Hopkins ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooding conditions and temporary mitigation measures have degraded station 13.8kV System OBJECTIVE:

Restore Station 13.8kV System to functional status Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Remove sandbags for Construction Hopkins 8/27/2011 Completed CWO task or inspection access to padmount T&D switch SW1062

2. Inspect 13.8kV T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 Inspection punchlist underground padmount T&D switch SW1062

3. Inspect and/or test T&D T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 Inspection punchlist and/or test report 13.8kV transformer 13TN43G

4. Inspect manholes MH1 T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 Inspection punchlist through MH5 associated with circuit 231 between T&D switch SW1062 to T&D transformer 13TN43G Page 1 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.4 13.8 kV Underground Distribution Damage Assessment and Restoration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

5. Inspect ducts associated T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 Inspection punchlist with manholes MH1 through MH5 between T&D switch SW1062 to T&D transformer 13TN43G and repair as necessary

6. Inspect and/or test Circuit T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 Inspection punchlist and/or test report 231 from T&D switch SW1062 to T&D transformer 13TN43G and repair as necessary Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Develop design changes DEN & T&D Sterba 9/5/2011 10/28/2011 Design change package based on walk down and lesson learned to allow circuit 231 from T&D switch SW1062 to transformer 13TN43G to function during applicable design basis flooding

2. Verify inventory and/or T&D Hopkins 9/5/2011 10/28/2011 Completed Material develop material Requisitions or inventory list requisitions.

Page 2 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.4 13.8 kV Underground Distribution Damage Assessment and Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

3. Develop required Work T&D Hopkins 9/5/2011 10/28/2011 Approved Work Orders Orders

4. Implement Work Orders T&D Hopkins 9/30/2011 10/28/2011 Completed Work Orders

5. T&D Hopkins 10/14/2011 10/28/2011 Completed test procedures T&D test new installation as and verifying that system is required functional

6. Remove sandbags for Construction Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Completed CWO task or access to 13.8kV T&D inspection transformers, switchgear and switches.

7. Inspect T&D 13.8kV T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist underground padmount switches

8. Inspect T&D switchgear T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist SW1067 and recommend replacement and/or relocation to preclude loss during design basis flooding

9. Inspect and/or test T&D T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist and/or test 13.8kV transformers report located in the OCA

10. Inspect and/or test T&D T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist and/or test 13.8kV transformers report located in the PA

11. Inspect associated T&D T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist 13.8kV distribution manholes for possible waterproofing Page 3 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 1.4 13.8 kV Underground Distribution Damage Assessment and Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

12. Inspect any pole mounted T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist drops for necessary extensions and waterproofing

13. Test T&D 13.8kv cables and T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist and/or test recommend replacement. report

14. Test 13.8kV load cables T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Inspection punchlist and/or test associated with switchgear report SW1067 and recommend replacement

15. Recommend and develop DEN & T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Design Change Package design changes to preclude loss during design basis flooding as determined by analysis

16. Verify inventory and/or T&D Hopkins 8/27/2011 12/31/2011 Completed material develop material requisitions or inventory lists requisitions with lead times.

17. Develop required T&D T&D Hopkins 9/5/2011 12/31/2011 Approved Work Orders Work Orders

18. Implement Work Orders T&D Hopkins 9/30/2011 12/31/2011 Completed Work Orders

19. Replace 13.8kv cables as T&D Hopkins 9/30/2011 12/31/2011 Complete Work Orders recommended by T&D

20. Replace/repair pad T&D Hopkins 9/30/2011 12/31/2011 Complete Work Orders mounted switches as recommended by T&D

21. T&D Hopkins 12/16/2011 12/31/2011 Completed Test Procedures T&D test new installation as and verify that system is required functional Page 4 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.1 Station Fire Protection Damage Assessment and Restoration FOCUS AREA: Plant Systems and Equipment ACTION PLAN: Station Fire Protection Damage Assessment and Restoration ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 2.1 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Kevin Naser ACTION PLAN OWNER: Gaston Riva ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooding conditions and temporary mitigation measures may have degraded station fire protection and fire detection systems and components.

OBJECTIVE:

Restore all flood affected fire protection systems and equipment to functional and operable status. Ensure all areas of the plant are in compliance with applicable fire protection standing orders and program requirements.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Ensure all underground Engineering Frans 8/8/2011 System health assessment report and piping is intact and no Programs geotechnical assessment report voids are present near FP piping

2. Repair any damaged or Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents non functional fire hydrants located inside the protected area or connected to the main fire protection header ring Page 1 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.1 Station Fire Protection Damage Assessment and Restoration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

3. Flush fire protection system Operations / Kingston 8/15/2011 Completed system flushing plan piping connected to the Chemistry fire protection header ring which flowed river water during flood mitigation actions

4. Inspect all SO-G-103 fire Quality Control Beasley 8/1/2011 Completed maintenance/inspection work barriers in plant buildings documents affected by flood waters.

Include Pyrocrete barriers in Intake Structure

5. Verify soil compaction and Engineering Erdman 9/12/2011 System health assessment report and moisture content in areas Programs geotechnical assessment report of underground fire protection main header ring and attached piping is per NFPA requirements

6. Restore the exterior fire Operations Pallas 9/5/2011 Completed PM and ST procedures for hose hose houses impacted by house inspections and testing flooding to functional condition

7. Verify proper functioning of Operations Pallas 9/5/2011 Completed PM and ST procedures for hose flood affected fire hose house testing. Closed fire impairment permits houses

8. Complete FP System PMs Operations Pallas 8/15/2011 Completed PMs and STs and associated work and STs on flood impacted order documents equipment which was not accessible for inspection and testing Page 2 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.1 Station Fire Protection Damage Assessment and Restoration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

9. Complete full flow testing System Riva 8/31/2011 Completed STs of fire pumps prior to drop Engineering /

date of 9/14/2011 Operations

10. Remove the plugs that Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 Completed work maintenance documents were installed in the transformer pits for drainage from the rocks Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Restore transformers T1A3 Operations Pallas 8/31/2011 9/30/2011 Completed operating and T1A1 deluge valves to instructions and closed fire service impairment permits

2. Repair any damaged or Maintenance Uehling 9/12/2011 11/15/2011 Completed work maintenance non functional fire hydrants documents not connected to the fire protection header ring

3. Flush fire protection system Operations / Kingston 9/12/2011 10/14/2011 Completed system flushing piping not connected to Chemistry plan the fire protection header ring which flowed river water during flood mitigation actions Page 3 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.1 Station Fire Protection Damage Assessment and Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

4. Clean and repair coating Maintenance Uehling 9/19/2011 11/15/2011 Completed work maintenance of all flood affected FP documents piping and equipment exposed to flood waters

5. Restore Maintenance Operations Pallas 9/26/2011 11/15/2011 Completed operating fabrication shop deluge instructions and closed fire valve impairment permits Page 4 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.2 System Health Assessments FOCUS AREA: Plant Systems and Equipment ACTION PLAN: System Health Assessments ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 2.2 COMPLETION DATE: 9/30/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Kevin Naser ACTION PLAN OWNER: Kevin Naser ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooding conditions and temporary mitigation measures may have degraded station structures, systems, and components.

OBJECTIVE:

Identify actions required to restore system health.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Complete the Auxiliary System Dolton 8/1/2011 Auxiliary Cooling System (ACS) Flooding Cooling System (ACS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

2. Complete the Auxiliary System Jun 8/1/2011 Auxiliary Feedwater System (AFW) Flooding Feedwater System (AFW) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

3. Complete the Auxiliary System Bozarth 8/1/2011 Auxiliary Instrumentation System (AIS) Flooding Instrumentation System Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report (AIS) Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report Page 1 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.2 System Health Assessments Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

4. Complete the Control Rod System Jun 8/1/2011 Control Rod Drive System (CRD) Flooding Drive System (CRD) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

5. Complete the Chemical System Ruhsam 8/1/2011 Chemical and Volume Control System (CVC) and Volume Control Engineering Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System (CVC) Flooding report Recovery System Health Assessment report

6. Complete the Circulating System Koenig 8/1/2011 Circulating Water System (CWS) Flooding Water System (CWS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

7. Complete the Emergency System Dean 8/1/2011 Emergency Core Cooling System (ECC)

Core Cooling System Engineering Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment (ECC) Flooding Recovery report System Health Assessment report

8. Complete the Emergency System Beck 8/1/2011 Emergency Diesel Generator System (EDG)

Diesel Generator System Engineering Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment (EDG) Flooding Recovery report System Health Assessment report

9. Complete the Electrical System Bottum 8/1/2011 Electrical Distribution System (EDS) Flooding Distribution System (EDS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report Page 2 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.2 System Health Assessments Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

10. Complete the Engineered System Bozarth 8/1/2011 Engineered Safety Features System (ESF)

Safety Features System Engineering Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment (ESF) Flooding Recovery report System Health Assessment report

11. Complete the Fuel System Bare 8/1/2011 Fuel Handling System (FHS) Flooding Recovery Handling System (FHS) Engineering System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

12. Complete the Fire System Riva 8/1/2011 Fire Protection System (FPS) Flooding Recovery Protection System (FPS) Engineering System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

13. Complete the Hoisting System Winterboer 8/1/2011 Hoisting Equipment System (HES) Flooding Equipment System (HES) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

14. Complete the Instrument System Koenig 8/1/2011 Instrument Air System (IAS) Flooding Recovery Air System (IAS) Flooding Engineering System Health Assessment report Recovery System Health Assessment report

15. Complete the Main System Phillips 8/1/2011 Main Feedwater System (FWS) Flooding Feedwater System (FWS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

16. Complete the Reactor System Jun 8/1/2011 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Flooding Coolant System (RCS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report Page 3 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.2 System Health Assessments Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

17. Complete the Radiation System Bozarth 8/1/2011 Radiation Monitoring System (RMS) Flooding Monitoring System (RMS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

18. Complete the Reactor System Bare 8/1/2011 Reactor Protection System (RPS) Flooding Protection System (RPS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

19. Complete the Spent Fuel System Ruhsam 8/1/2011 Spent Fuel Pool System (SFP) Flooding Pool System (SFP) Flooding Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Recovery System Health Assessment report

20. Complete the Steam System Phillips 8/1/2011 Steam Generator System (SGS) Flooding Generator System (SGS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

21. Complete the Sampling System Ruhsam 8/1/2011 Sampling System (SLS) Flooding Recovery System (SLS) Flooding Engineering System Health Assessment report Recovery System Health Assessment report

22. Complete the Structures System Beck 8/1/2011 Structures System (STR) Flooding Recovery System (STR) Flooding Engineering System Health Assessment report Recovery System Health Assessment report

23. Complete the Turbine System Mierzejewski 8/1/2011 Turbine Generator System (TGS) Flooding Generator System (TGS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report Page 4 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.2 System Health Assessments Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

24. Complete the Turbine System Koenig 8/1/2011 Turbine Plant Cooling System (TPC) Flooding Plant Cooling System (TPC) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

25. Complete the Ventilating System Mierzejewski 8/1/2011 Ventilating Air Conditioning System (VAC)

Air Conditioning System Engineering Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment (VAC) Flooding Recovery report System Health Assessment report

26. Complete the Waste System Ruhsam 8/1/2011 Waste Disposal System (WDS) Flooding Disposal System (WDS) Engineering Recovery System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

27. Complete the System Koenig 8/1/2011 Demineralized Water / Potable Water Demineralized Water / Engineering (DW/PW) Flooding Recovery System Health Potable Water (DW/PW) Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

28. Complete the Vents and System Koenig 8/1/2011 Vents and Drains (VD) Flooding Recovery Drains (VD) Flooding Engineering System Health Assessment report Recovery System Health Assessment report. This will include Sanitary and Storm Drains

29. Complete the Auxiliary System Phillips 8/1/2011 Auxiliary Steam Flooding Recovery System Steam Flooding Recovery Engineering Health Assessment report System Health Assessment report. This will include the Auxiliary Boiler Page 5 of 6 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.2 System Health Assessments Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

30. Complete the System Bozarth 8/1/2011 Meteorological Monitoring Flooding Recovery Meteorological Monitoring Engineering System Health Assessment report Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment report

31. Complete the Plant System Bunting 8/1/2011 Plant Security Systems Flooding Recovery Security Systems Flooding Engineering System Health Assessment report Recovery System Health Assessment report

32. Complete the Plant System Bozarth 8/1/2011 Plant Security Systems Flooding Recovery Security Systems Flooding Engineering System Health Assessment report Recovery System Health Assessment report Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 6 of 6 Revision 0

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Executive Summary Prepared by: Date: Approved by: Date:

Contents Status of Temporary Modifications Status of Preventive Maintenance (PM) Activities and Deferrals Status of Major Systems, Structures, and Components (SSCs) Related to Technical Specification and USAR Requirements FloodingRelated Condition Reports System Engineering Walkdown - SSC Condition Assessment (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Att 3)

System Engineering Walkdown - Trendable Gauge/Process Readings (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Att 3)

Mechanical Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Att2)

Structural Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Att 2)

Electrical Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Att 2)

Generic Plant Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Att\2)

Page 1 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Status of Temporary Modifications List any open temporary modifications (TM) to the system. If the system has no open temporary modifications, mark the first TM EC line as N/A.

TM EC Description CR No(s) Work Criteria for Flood Event Restoration If restoration is not required Number Order(s) Restoration Related? required prior prior to startup, provide (Yes/No) to startup? justification.

(Yes/No)

Page 2 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Status of PM Task Deferrals List any PM tasks that have been deferred as a result of flooding. If no PMs have been deferred due to flooding, mark the first line PMID as N/A and state that no deferrals have occurred under the justification column.

PMID Description Due Date Required Prior to If not required prior to startup, please provide justification Startup?

(Yes/No)

Page 3 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Flooding Effects on Operating Conditions of Systems, Structures, and Components (SSCs)

List any SSCs in the system that have experienced unusual operating conditions due to the flooding incident (e.g. outofservice for longer than usual, in service for longer than usual, functioning at a different capacity or operating point from usual, etc.). If flooding has not resulted in any unusual system operating conditions, mark the first SSC (tag) line as N/A and describe why system operation is unaffected under the justification column.

SSC (tag) Description/Function Operation (hrs, design point, etc.) Further Evaluation If yes, provide If no, provide justification.

Required? (Yes/No) CR Number Normal During Flooding Page 4 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

FloodingRelated Condition Reports List all CRs written on system operation or system SSCs due to the flooding event and provide the status and disposition of corrective actions for each. If no floodingrelated CRs have been written on system SSCs, mark the first CR Number line N/A.

CR Number Level Description of Condition Status Status and Disposition of Corrective Actions If Actions are Not Required to be Completed (Open/ Prior to Startup, Provide Justification.

Closed)

Page 5 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

System Engineering Walkdown - SSC Condition Assessment (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 3)

Area /Room (attach additional forms for each area/room inspected):

SSC (tag) Affected by Observations/Comments Recommended Action CR Number WR Number If no further action is recommended, Flooding? (Repair, further provide justification.

(Yes/No) evaluation, none)

Note: PEDSEI20 requirements have been enhanced to highlight and address floodspecific issues. However, this is intended to be a full system walkdown and not limited to floodaffected SSCs.

Work Completed by: Date: Reviewed by:

Page 6 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

System Engineering Walkdown - Trendable Gauge/Process Readings (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 3)

Area /Room (attach additional forms for each area/room inspected) :

Tag/Identifier Value Units Comments Tag/Identifier Value Units Comments Page 7 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Active System Leaks Handheld Temperature/Vibration Probe Readings Tag/Identifier Fluid Type Leak Rate Comments Tag/Identifier Value Units Comments Note: PEDSEI20 requirements have been enhanced to highlight and address floodspecific issues. However, this is intended to be a full system walkdown and not limited to floodaffected SSCs.

Walkdown Completed by: Date: Reviewed by:

Page 8 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Mechanical Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 2)

Pumps Valves

[ ] Are the foundation bolts installed correctly? [ ] Are there any visible packing leaks?

[ ] Is the oiler full? [ ] Instrument Air leaks?

[ ] Does the pump/motor sound right? [ ] Bent tubing?

[ ] Are operating parameters (suction / discharge [ ] Instrument Air regulator normal range?

pressures / amps) normal? [ ] Is stem adequately lubricated?

[ ] Is it clean? [ ] Is valve labeled correctly?

[ ] Is there evidence of new or even old leaks? [ ] Are there bodytobonnet leaks?

[ ] Is the foundation drain plugged or clear? [ ] Missing fasteners or handwheels?

[ ] Is the machine labeled correctly and [ ] What is the condition of the paint?

completely? [ ] Are there any signs of corrosion?

[ ] Are there missing fasteners, handwheels or [ ] Flexible conduits attached correctly?

parts? [ ] Is motor kept dry?

[ ] Is the instrumentation tubing crimped? [ ] Are compartment drains open?

[ ] Is there evidence of unusual vibration? Heat Exchangers

[ ] Are there any signs of corrosion? [ ] Are flow rates normal?

[ ] What is the condition of paint/coatings? [ ] Are temperatures normal?

[ ] Are all safety devices properly installed? [ ] Any evidence of leakage at flanges?

Piping [ ] Is protective coating in good condition?

[ ] Any evidence of leakage? [ ] Is insulation installed?

[ ] Are flow rates normal? Boric Acid

[ ] Are flanges properly bolted? [ ] Is there an active leak?

[ ] Are pipe supports properly installed? [ ] Is there any dried boric acid on the

[ ] Is protective coating in good condition? equipment?

[ ] Is insulation installed? Pipe Supports Filters/Strainers [ ] Loose or missing nuts?

[ ] Any evidence of leakage? [ ] Correct alignment?

[ ] Is P normal? [ ] Is the fluid level sufficient for snubbers?

[ ] Are flanges properly bolted? [ ] Is there evidence of bolt torque relaxation?

[ ] Is protective coating in good condition? [ ] Is the surface condition of structural welds

[ ] Is flush line valve in proper position? satisfactory?

[ ] Any evidence of packing leakage? [ ] Is protective coating in good condition?

Storage Tanks [ ] Is there any corrosion or deposits visible

[ ] Any evidence of leakage? under support/clamps?

[ ] Is vent clear?

[ ] Is protective coating in good condition?

Page 9 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Special Considerations for Evaluating Mechanical SSCs Impacted by Flooding Water Intrusion into Mechanical Equipment Water Affect on Mechanical Equipment Exterior

[ ] Evidence of floodinduced component [ ] Evidence of floodinduced erosion of corrosion? housings, base plates, or other components?

[ ] Is there any flood water in equipment oil [ ] Any damage to coatings?

reservoirs? [ ] Any damage to components from impact of

[ ] Any foreign material introduced by flood flood debris?

waters? [ ] Loosening of fasteners that secure

[ ] Evidence of degraded bearing lubrication? equipment?

[ ] Any biodeposits or fouling?

Page 10 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Structural Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 2)

Concrete Structures and Supports Steel Structures

[ ] Are there abnormal wear patterns on the [ ] Is there any bending or deformation?

surface (areas of missing protective coating [ ] Are there any cracked welds?

exhibiting feathered edges of the sound [ ] Is there a white crystalline deposit on the coating)? surface?

[ ] Is there evidence of blisters and scaling [ ] Is there evidence of corrosion attack and (irregular raising of a thin layer) of the accumulation of corrosion products on the concrete surface; pitting; spalling and popout surface?

(small up to 10 mm, medium 1050 mm, large [ ] Is there discoloration of the protective

> 50mm)? coating?

[ ] Are there bug holes (cavities usually not [ ] Are there bird nests or droppings on the exceeding 25 mm resulting from entrapment surface?

of air bubbles in the surface)? [ ] Are there loose anchor bolts?

[ ] Is there evidence of cracking or fracture? [ ] Are there cracks in the protective coating?

[ ] Is there exposed aggregate? [ ] Are there blisters in the protective coating?

[ ] Has there been a [ ] Are corrosion products delaminating or deflection/deformation/distortion (a change scaling from the surface in layers?

in dimensional shape) over time? [ ] Is the bolting corroded?

[ ] Is there discoloration? [ ] Are there cracked, damaged or missing grout

[ ] Is there any evidence of exudation (a liquid or pads under baseplates?

viscous gellike material discharged through a crack, pore, or opening in the surface)?

[ ] Is there any efflouresence (a deposit of salt formed on the surface)?

[ ] Is there exposed reinforcement?

[ ] Is there misalignment at construction joints or pipe joint or misaligned doors?

[ ] Are there loose or damaged elastomeric waterproofing membranes (e.g., tank wall membrane)?

[ ] Has there been growth of an existing crack?

[ ] Is there blistering of protective coatings?

[ ] Is there cracking in the protective coatings?

[ ] Is there cracking or distortion of elastomeric sealants, caulking or gaskets?

Page 11 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Special Considerations for Evaluating Structural SSCs Impacted by Flooding Exposure of Structures to Flood Waters

[ ] Evidence of any extraordinary stresses on structures induced by flood current or abnormal static water pressure? (e.g. cracks, leaks, etc.)

[ ] Evidence of soil erosion around structure foundations due to flood water exposure?

[ ] Evidence of settling or other foundation degradation due to flood water exposure?

[ ] Do any structural support/reinforcement members indicate degradation from exposure to flood waters (e.g. loosening of fasteners, damage due to flood debris impact, material erosion, etc.)?

Page 12 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Electrical Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 2)

Batteries Transformers

[ ] Are terminal posts free of corrosion? [ ] Are filters/radiators clear of debris?

[ ] Is electrolyte above low level mark in each [ ] Does the transformer sound normal?

cell? [ ] Does the transformer feel warmer than usual?

[ ] Are there any defects in the cell cases? [ ] Are the forced cooling fans in service?

[ ] Is the room temperature satisfactory? [ ] Are there any cracked ceramic insulator fins?

[ ] Is there excessive sedimentation of cells? [ ] Are temperature gauges reading normal

[ ] Are plates normal color? values?

[ ] Is battery charger supplying excessive [ ] Are there any missing fasteners on covers?

current? [ ] Is ground strap connected to transformer?

[ ] Is there acid buildup on battery rack? [ ] Check bushing oil levels.

[ ] Is ground strap connected to battery rack?

Motors Distribution Panels

[ ] Does the motor sound normal? [ ] Is the flash cover installed?

[ ] Is there excessive motor vibration? [ ] Are there any tripped breakers?

[ ] Is the motor warmer than usual? [ ] Are any of the breakers hottothetouch?

[ ] Is the ground strap connected? [ ] Are covers installed on any open knockouts?

[ ] Are the air vents clear of debris? [ ] Is there any debris between panel and wall?

[ ] Are oil levels normal? [ ] Is ground strap connected?

[ ] Are the amps in the normal range? [ ] Are all conduit hubs/rings tight?

[ ] Is the space heater on (idle motor)? [ ] Is there water dripping on the panel?

[ ] Is the motor dry?

[ ] Is the flexible conduit properly attached?

Electrical Cabinets Wiring and Connectors

[ ] Is the interior clean? [ ] Are terminations limited to 2 conductors?

[ ] Are louvers and air filters clean? [ ] Is there excessive exposed conductor at lug?

[ ] Are door gaskets intact? [ ] Is insulation intact over length of wire?

[ ] Do door handles work? [ ] Are there improperly trained wires?

[ ] Is there excessive dust buildup on internal devices?

[ ] Is ground strap connected?

[ ] Is there any sign of moisture intrusion?

[ ] Are foam fire barriers intact?

[ ] Are there any blown fuses (indicator popped out)?

[ ] Do any relays appear overheated?

Page 13 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Electrical Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 2)

Cable Trays Switches

[ ] Are fire stops installed on vertical runs of tray? [ ] Is handle attached?

[ ] Is station ground cable firmly attached? [ ] Is dust cover installed?

[ ] Are there any bowed sections of tray? [ ] Are wires trained away from moving contacts?

[ ] Are tray supports attached at both ends? [ ] Is there excessive dust buildup at contacts?

[ ] Are there any cables outside the tray?

[ ] Are cables properly separated?

Conduits Security Equipment

[ ] Are covers installed? [ ] Does security door latch properly after passing

[ ] Is sealtight properly connected at end fittings? through?

[ ] Is card reader properly attached to faceplate?

[ ] Are magnetic switches properly aligned?

[ ] Are there any holes in fence fabric?

[ ] Do cameras have any obstructions?

Special Considerations for Evaluating Electrical SSCs Impacted by Flooding Water Intrusion into Electrical Equipment Water Affect on Electrical Equipment Exterior

[ ] Evidence water in motor windings? [ ] Erosion of cable insulation?

[ ] Deposits/fouling inside motors, breakers, [ ] Cable Insulation degraded due to chemical junction boxes, transformers, conduit, etc.? attack?

[ ] Any floodinduced corrosion of contacts? [ ] Damage to cables, cable supports, conduit, etc.

[ ] Evidence of condensation? from impact of flood debris?

[ ] Damage to transformers or switchgears due to flood water?

Page 14 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Computer Systems Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 2)

ERF Distributed Control System (DCS)

On ERF Page SCH: Check System Alarm Messages using Baretail, AIM Inform Review the list of scheduled ERF tasks or Foxray on PCDCS01:

(processes) [ ] Are there any unexplained equipment failures?

[ ] Are all processes current and updating per set [ ] Are there any unusual GPS Time Synch Messages?

frequency: Check Process Alarm history using the CAD alarm history or On ERF Page ALM: Foxray Alarm Statistics Inspect several pages of alarm history. [ ] Are there any other unusual or unexplained alarms?

[ ] Are there any alarms indicating loss of communication [ ] Are there any indication of chattering alarms that with QSPDS or gateways? could or should be addressed?

[ ] Are there any alarms indicating loss of [ ] Are there any indication or operator nuisance alarms communication with ERDS or MET Tower? that should be addressed?

On ERF Page SYS: [ ] Are there any indications of misconfigured alarms?

Review contents of page Check Printer Status

[ ] Are the historians and gateways connected [ ] On PCDCS01 (EWCU01) Ensure both printers have a normally? status of Ready (Start/Settings/Printers and Faxes)

[ ] Does the display indicate a current and backup ERF Check Graphics:

node? [ ] View some random DCS pages and verify there are no

[ ] Is the BACKUP INSYNC status YES? obvious display issues.

[ ] Does QSPDS A and QSPDS B status indicate UP?

[ ] Do the Weather Tower Statuses for LOSS OF PWR, LOSS OF LIGHTS and LOSS OF DL LINK all indicate NO?

Plant Data Network (PDN)

Check Network Status:

On workstation QCPDN01 assess the network displays

[ ] Do all the network switch link statuses appear good with no more than a momentary degraded indication?

[ ] Is any switch or station degraded or failed?

Page 15 of 16

Flooding Recovery System Health Assessment System: Group:

System Engineer: Backup System Engineer:

Reporting Period: Date:

Generic Plant Walkdown AttentiontoDetail Reminders (Adapted from PEDSEI20, Attachment 2)

Housekeeping Configuration Control

[ ] Verify combustibles (e.g.: rags, absorbent [ ] Verify P&ID's reflect actual system configuration.

cloths) are not in proximity of rotating or hot [ ] Verify WO tag deficiencies being tracked.

surfaces. [ ] Verify condition does not affect system

[ ] Verify station cleanliness standards are being operability.

maintained.

[ ] Verify coating meet station standards.

Unauthorized Temporary Modifications Modification and Maintenance Work in Progress

[ ] Inspect for electrical jumpers, piping, or ducts [ ] Verify interim configuration does not have that are not part of the system design. negative impact on system performance.

[ ] Inspect for temporary equipment connected to [ ] Verify scaffolding and ladders are not erected too a system. close to critical equipment and that they are

[ ] Inspect for permanent equipment electrically properly secured.

or mechanical disconnected. [ ] Verify testing of other equipment does not have

[ ] Inspect for temporary hoses connecting 2 fluid negative influence on system performance.

systems. [ ] Verify welding and grinding does not negatively

[ ] Inspect for electrical cable, including extension impact nearby equipment.

cords that violate separation criteria. [ ] Verify that spare electrical wires are isolated and

[ ] Inspect for taped or plugged floor drains. taped.

[ ] Inspect for temporary cooling fans or space heaters being used to maintain equipment in operation.

Special Considerations for General Evaluation of SSCs Impacted by Flooding Exposure of SSCs to Flood Waters

[ ] Evidence that a SSC has been wetted by river water (Ref also CR record).

[ ] SSC has been directly impacted by river water (Ref also CR record).

[ ] Evidence of system chemistry degradation as a result of exposure to flood waters?

[ ] Evidence of component damage or degradation resulting from flood mitigation efforts (e.g.

impact by flood barriers, heavy equipment traffic, sandbagging, operation of pumping stations, etc.)?

Page 16 of 16

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.3 Wetted Motor Damage Assessment and Restoration FOCUS AREA: Plant Systems and Equipment ACTION PLAN: Wetted Motor Damage Assessment and Restoration ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 2.3 COMPLETION DATE: 06/30/2012 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Kevin Naser ACTION PLAN OWNER: Glen Seier ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooding conditions may have wetted and degraded plant electric motors.

OBJECTIVE:

Restore all wetted electric motors to a functional status.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Assess whether motor is to System SE/Motor 8/15/2011 System health assessment report be tested for possible use, Engineering Engineer refurbished or replaced (if motor was exposed to water for an extended period of time refurbishment and/or replacement is warranted).

For motors to be tested for possible use:

2. Take oil sample from Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 Complete maintenance work documents bearing housings.

3. Evaluate if water has Engineering Reimers 8/15/2011 Predictive Maintenance Group to evaluate gotten in contact with Programs sampled oil test results for water bearings. contamination Page 1 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.3 Wetted Motor Damage Assessment and Restoration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

4. Refurbish motor if water Engineering Seier 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents.

contamination is present in Programs, Purchase order will be needed for Vendor oil. Replace motor in Vendor support. Vendor to provide motor whole is an additional refurbishment report.

option. A new motor can be used if available

5. Perform visual and QC/Motor Seier 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents.

boroscope inspection of Engineer Visual inspection looking for internal motor internals (to contamination and degradation included termination box) looking for slit, pools of water, corrosion, etc.

6. Evaluate visual inspection Motor Engineer Seier 8/15/2011 Condition reports and/or Work Request will be results for possible actions generated for actions needed based on visual (removal of moisture, inspection results cleaning, refurbishment of motor)

7. If bearings are in good Electrical EM/Motor 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents.

condition and motor is Maintenance Engineer The testing can be done from the termination visibly in good condition, box at the motor or from the MCC if the Static Test Motor (resistive feeder cables to the motor have been found balance, megger, PI). acceptable (Reference Underground Cable Assessment Plan)

8. If Static Test results are SAT, Ops/Mnt/QC Maintenance 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents motor can be started.

Maintenance oversight of initial run. Vibration data to be taken during initial run For motors to be refurbished:

Page 2 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.3 Wetted Motor Damage Assessment and Restoration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

9. Remove motor and Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents prepare for shipment to vendor.

10. Refurbish motor Motor Engineer, Seier 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents.

Vendor Purchase order will be needed for Vendor support. Vendor to provide motor refurbishment report.

A new motor can be used if available

11. Install refurbished motor Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents

12. Post Maintenance Testing Mnt/Ops Maintenance 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents of motor For motors to be replaced:

13. Ensure spare motor is Maintenance Hodgson 8/15/2011 Complete maintenance work documents available or order new Planning motor

14. Remove degraded motor Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents

15. Install new motor Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents

16. Post Maintenance Testing Mnt/Ops Maintenance 8/15/2011 Completed maintenance work documents of motor Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 3 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 2.3 Wetted Motor Damage Assessment and Restoration Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. If system design allows, the Maintenance Uehling 11/15/2011 06/30/2012 Completed maintenance work degraded motor can be documents refurbished or replaced as a Long-Term action (i.e.

one of three circulating water motors was found degraded)

Page 4 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews FOCUS AREA: Long Term Equipment Reliability ACTION PLAN: Engineering Program Reviews ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 3.1 COMPLETION DATE: 9/30/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Mark Frans ACTION PLAN OWNER: Mark Frans ISSUE DEFINITION:

Review all Engineering Programs and determine if flood recovery plans are needed for each program.

OBJECTIVE:

Ensure all site restoration issues associated with Engineering Programs are included in Site Restoration Plan.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Document review of all Engineering Frans 8/1/2011 Spreadsheet documenting program reviews Engineering Programs Programs (attached)

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 1 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews Question #4: Did Question #1: the condition of Have any of Question #3: the river water the program Could flood flooding change Question #8:

components water that came river water Question #7: Are there any come in in contact with properties to a Question #5: Could Are there flooding contact with Question #2: the program point that is the extended any flooding temporary flood water? Does river water component have different than period of time of Question #6: Could CRs that modifications IF answered normally come in any additional expected and river flooding the added elevation would not that would no, questions contact with the negative effect could result in a conditions result in of the river have a be covered not be Conclusion (flood 2 through 6 components other than negative effect an accumulative negative effect on by the covered by recovery needed will be during normal normal on a program negative effect on the program system the system Yes or No) IF no Program Owner N/A'd. operation? operation? component? the component? components? review? review? Comments explain why.

No Steam generators were not affected by flood waters and will be walked Steam Hutchinson, down by system Generators Teddy No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A engineer.

No Flooding conditions would not affect code requirements, system engineer walkdowns will find any issues Inservice Downey, that may need Inspection Patrick Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A No No N/A further screening.

No Flooding conditions would Bretey, not affect any FAC Flow Accelera Nicole No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A susceptible piping No check valves are known to have been No System submerged or interaction review externally would address exposed to flood effects on check Check Valves Taylor, Dave Yes Yes No No No No No No water valves.

Page 2 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews No Containment leak rate will not Containment L Miller, be affected by

& LLRT) Glenn No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A flood waters.

No Snubbers are located inside buildings and would be seen on the system Snubbers Grewe, Jim No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A walkdowns.

No Containment tendon testing Containme will not be nt Tendon Miller, affected by flood Testing Glenn No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A waters.

MOV Program Valves did not come into contact with floodwater; No System therefore, no interaction review Motor flood recovery would address Operated Swerczek, actions are effects on MOV Valves Jim No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No required. Program Valves.

No relief valves are known to have been No System submerged or interaction review externally would address Relief exposed to flood effects on relief Valves Taylor, Dave Yes Yes No No No No No No water valves.

No Boric acid corrosion is inside buildings that were not affected by flood waters and will be seen Boric Acid by system Corrosion Steffen, engineers on their Control Dave No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A walkdowns.

Page 3 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews No Cobalt Reduction is only for components inside containment, so not effect from Cobalt Reduct Lisowyj, Bob No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A flooding.

No Current PM procedures are unchanged.

Changes in frequency will be Huang, covered by the Preventive Main Claudio Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A PM process.

No Current PdM Technologies are unchanged.

Changes in frequency will be Reimers, covered by PM Predictive Ma Josh Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A change process.

Thermal Performanc Bretey, No The plant is e Nicole No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A not operating No Equipment under water, possibly degrading but will be covered by Maintenance Zagata, Joe Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A system reviews Yes underground piping will need to be evaluated to Maassen, ensure there are Service Water Kristen Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No N/A no voids Page 4 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews No Alloy 600 is only in containment and flooding did not affect Alloy 600 Lisowyj, Bob No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A containment.

No Other than possibility of water intrusion in conduit systems in designated areas and this will be covered by the Electrical Equi system Qualification Smidt, Jeff No No Yes No No No No No N/A walkdowns.

No the life cycle management program is a program that encompasses all Maassen, the other Life Cycle Man Kristen N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A programs.

No No submergence of any AOV is known to have occurred.

FCV1904A/B/C may have had some residual spray on the valves. This did not result in any Molzer, component Air Operated V Doug Yes No No No No No No No N/A degradation.

The CW motors have gotten wet.

Wetted motors outside of the Large Motor Program will be Yes A Wetted addressed by Motor Recovery System Plan has been Large Motors Seier,Glen Yes No Yes N/A Yes No No No Walkdowns. developed.

Page 5 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews No Welding program is a process that is not affected by Welding Grewe, Jim No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A flooding.

The utility building was surrounded by water. The haul route and ISFSI pad will have to be inspected due Yes ISFSI to high recovery plan will Hutchinson, groundwater cover all needed Dry Fuel Stora Teddy Yes No Yes N/A Yes Yes No No and flooding. inspections.

Yes underground Buried piping will need to Piping & be evaluated to Component Maassen, ensure there are s Kristen Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No N/A no voids None with current commitments, if No inspections a new aging are already effect is found planned and are OneTime Maassen, then will re commitments Inspections Kristen No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No evaluate from the NRC Yes Testing of Cables & impacted cables Connection and connections s Smidt, Jeff Yes No Yes N/A Yes Yes No No N/A will be necessary.

No Fatigue Monitoring deals with equipment inside containment and was not affected Fatigue Monit Lisowyj, Bob No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A by flooding.

Managing Gas No Flooding Accumulati conditions did not on in Safety Bretey, affect the ECCS Systems Nicole No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A piping Page 6 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews No License Renewal is a group of commitments made to the NRC in the past, flooding will not Maassen, affect the License Renew Kristen No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A commitments.

No All components in the RCS leak rate monitoring program are inside buildings and were not affected by flood water and will be covered by Hutchinson, system RCS Leak Rate Teddy No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A walkdowns No Program components did Control not come in Room contact with flood Habitability Turner, Phil No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A water.

Yes The storm sewers onsite need to be Groundwat inspected, need er Maassen, to ensure they are Protection Kristen Yes No Yes N/A N/A No No No N/A not leaking.

No Program components did Containme not come in nt contact with flood Insulations Turner, Phil No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A water.

No all components in this program are located in Thermal Containment and Aging flood waters did Embrittlem Maassen, not affect these ent Kristen No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A components Page 7 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews Overhead No Program Load components did Handling not come in Systems contact with flood Inspection Turner, Phil No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A water.

No all components in None of the this program are Selective in the CCW Leaching system and flood components are waters did not Selective Maassen, in contact with affect these Leaching Kristen No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No river water components Yes Flood recovery is being driven by the Turbine Bldg.,

Auxiliary Bldg. and Intake Structure Structures Flood Recovery Monitoring Turner, Phil Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No N/A Plans No valve packing issues would be noticed by the system Valve Steffen, engineering Packing Dave Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No N/A walkdowns No surveillance tests / inservice testing requirements would not be affected by flooding conditions, they are set frequencies.

System reviews Surveillance would document Tests / In any STs that still service Boston, need to be Testing Kevin Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A No No N/A performed.

Page 8 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.1 Engineering Program Reviews The FP water suppression system is designed to pump river water. The exterior of the Yes Being system does not tracked by the normally come Fire Protection Fire Shudak, in contact with Recovery System Protection Tom Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No flood water. Plan Assumptions:

Flooding resulting in extending the outage is no different than any other condition that may extend an outage. Programs have processes in place to address outage extensions.

Having river water come in contact with program components does not automatically make it a candidate for negative effects on the component when the components are subjected to the river water in normal conditions.

Page 9 of 9 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.2 Underground Cable Assessment FOCUS AREA: Long Term Equipment Reliability ACTION PLAN: Underground Cable Assessment ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 3.2 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Mark Frans ACTION PLAN OWNER: Teddy Hutchinson ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooded cable manholes and vaults have subjected cables to conditions which may have impacted cable function and/or reliability.

OBJECTIVE:

Assess impact of submergence on Safety Related and Important to Safety/Production Cables within the Maintenance Rule Scope to assure a reasonable expectation of continued operability/functionality.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Test Maintenance Rule Program Hutchinson / 8/26/2011 Test 4 Raw Water Pump Motor Cables (AC-Medium Voltage Power Engineering Smidt 10A-D), 3 Circ Water Pump Motor Cables (CW-Cables subjected to 1A-C) and the Electric Fire Pump Motor Cable wetting/submergence (FP-1A) by Tan Delta and Partial Discharge testing

2. Test Maintenance Rule Program Hutchinson / 8/26/2011 Test Shielded Low Voltage cables by Tan Delta Low Voltage Power Cables Engineering Smidt & Partial Discharge; Test Unshielded Low subjected to Voltage by Indenter or AC Megger wetting/submergence

3. Test Maintenance Rule Program Hutchinson / 8/26/2011 Test by Indenter or AC Megger. CHAR testing Low Voltage Control and Engineering Smidt may also be useful; due to lesser observed Instrumentation Cables impact of water treeing in control and subjected to instrument cables, sampling is recommended wetting/submergence Page 1 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.2 Underground Cable Assessment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Test or Replace 13.8KV Transmission & Hopkins & 8/30/2011 13.8 KV cables are scheduled to be replaced Medium Voltage Cable for Distribution / Hutchinson / as part of the 13.8KV Underground Distribution Emergency Power Feed Program Smidt Recovery Plan from T&D. This will need to be and Met Tower Feed Engineering coordinated with Start up

2. Inspect Manholes and DEN Hyde 8/30/2011 Vaults for damage and integrity of water seals at penetrations

3. Contingency Cable EM Hutchinson / based on Replacement (If identified Smidt cable testing defective cable during testing)

Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 2 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.3 Underground Piping and Tanks Assessment FOCUS AREA: Long Term Equipment Reliability ACTION PLAN: Underground Piping and Tanks Assessment ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 3.3 COMPLETION DATE: 10/31/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Mark Frans ACTION PLAN OWNER: Ken Erdman ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooding conditions and temporary mitigation measures may have degraded underground piping and tanks.

OBJECTIVE:

Restore all station underground piping and tanks to functional status.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Inspect underground Program Erdman 9/6/2011 Ensure all underground piping and tanks using GPR Engineering piping and tanks are intact and no structurally (Ground Penetrating significant voids are present near piping Radar)

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 1 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 3.3 Underground Piping and Tanks Assessment Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. GPR (Ground Penetrating Program Erdman 9/15/2011 10/31/2011 Final report Radar) report finalized for Engineering documentation Page 2 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan - 3.4 I&C Power Supply Service Life Assessment FOCUS AREA: Long Term Equipment Reliability ACTION PLAN: I&C Power Supply Service Life Assessment ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 3.4 COMPLETION DATE: 6/30/2012 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Mark Frans ACTION PLAN OWNER: Ravi Tella ISSUE DEFINITION:

A few power supplies in the FCS Reactor Protection System (RPS) have failed. Some failures are due to age related failure mechanisms, including some equipment that was installed beyond the vendor or other established recommended service life. This same issue applies to Safety Related (CQE) - includes FID 1 & 2-power supplies in other systems.

OBJECTIVE:

Ensure safety-related (CQE) power supplies do not fail while in service by implementation of an effective equipment reliability strategy. Replace CQE power supplies that are beyond their established service life.

Develop a strong technical basis for all CQE power supplies that support the equipment reliability strategies for these power supplies.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Replace Non-RPS CQE Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Non-RPS CQE power supplies replaced that power supplies that will be Programs will beyond their recommended service life.

beyond their Work Order report - showing the applicable recommended service life WO in finished or complete status Page 1 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan - 3.4 I&C Power Supply Service Life Assessment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Establish High Impact Team Engineering Tella 5/28/2011 Team established and briefed on the task, with a Charter Programs objectives and Charter - Completed

2. Identify all CQE power Engineering Tella 5/28/2011 Excel list of all power supplies, including supplies; priority will be on Programs identification of those power supplies that do RPS CQE power supplies not have a unique component identification and then non-RPS CQE number in Asset Suite - Completed power supplies

3. Determine the installation Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Excel list with CQE power supplies and their date for FCS CQE power Programs installation dates supplies; these dates will be used to define those CQE power supplies that are beyond their service life

4. Conduct an industry and Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Word or Excel document with a summary of FCS specific analysis of Programs historical performance by manufacturer and historical performance for model and FCS component identification CQE power supplies; number for CQE power supplies determine the effectiveness of the current ER Strategies at the FCS component level

5. Conduct an analysis of the Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Revised ER Strategy document for CQE power current FCS ER Strategy for Programs supplies power supplies; contact vendors, review industry documentation, benchmark other plants Page 2 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan - 3.4 I&C Power Supply Service Life Assessment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

6. Determine the Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Excel list with manufacturer and model recommended service life Programs number and recommended service lives for for CQE power supplies each CQE power supply based on analyses performed earlier in this action plan These service lives will be based on: (1) manufacturer and model, (2) qualified life testing, (3) vendor recommendations and communication with vendors, (4) remnant life based on stress testing of removed power supplies, (5) industry and FCS specific historical performance and (6) actual duty cycle and service condition where these power supplies are installed

7. Conduct a failure modes Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Excel or Word document with Failure modes and effects analysis on Programs and effects analysis of each power supply each power supply to defining the system and plant impact of a ensure the impact of failure of that power supply failures is understood Page 3 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan - 3.4 I&C Power Supply Service Life Assessment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

8. Document the time based Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Word and Excel documents defining the time replacement strategy and Programs based replacement strategy and basis basis for CQE and RPS power supplies This strategy and basis will provide the tasks to be performed and the basis for the scope and frequency of those tasks.

This action is being completed before start up to ensure each power supply has been analyzed and a recommended service life defined

9. Define those power Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Excel list of power supplies beyond their supplies that are beyond Programs service life, including those that will be beyond their service life. This will their service life before the next refueling include power supplies outage; Operability Determination (NOD-QP-that will be beyond their 31) documenting the basis for power supplies service life before the next that will not be replaced planned refueling outage

10. Replace RPS CQE power Engineering Tella 6/15/2011 Work Order report - showing the applicable supplies beyond their Programs WO in finished or complete status service life Page 4 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan - 3.4 I&C Power Supply Service Life Assessment Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Complete the Engineering Tella 10/2/2011 2/3/2012 Fully developed ER Strategy development of the ER Programs loaded into IQReview Strategy for CQE power (software) supplies PM Change Requests (FC-This action will include all 1065) for PM Changes tasks to be performed and basis for those tasks and PM Change Requests for any PM changes

2. Implement PM Change Engineering Tella 10/2/2011 3/15/2012 PMs changed. PM Change Requests by changing PMs Programs Requests (FC-1065) verified to in Asset Suite be closed accurately Validate PM Changes in Asset Suite to be correct

3. Schedule new and revised Engineering Tella 10/2/2011 4/15/2012 PMs scheduled in Asset Suite PMs Programs Page 5 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.1 Plant and Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment FOCUS AREA: Design and Licensing Basis ACTION PLAN: Plant and Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 4.1 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Steve Miller ACTION PLAN OWNER: Ken Erdman ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooding may have negatively affected the functionality of existing structures.

OBJECTIVE:

Engineers geotechnical and structural assessment of the post-flood condition and functionality of buildings at FCS.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable Planning and Logistics Activities

1. Establish assessment Engineering Erdman 8/01/2011 Assessment requirements defined requirements Programs

2. Assemble OPPD & HDR Engineering Erdman 8/01/2011 HDR project guide program management Programs team

3. Select and assemble Engineering Erdman 8/01/2011 HDR project guide analysis teams Programs

4. Badging staff for plant Engineering Erdman 8/01/2011 Appropriate staff badged access Programs

5. Develop draft level 2 Engineering Erdman 8/01/2011 Draft Level 2 schedule.

schedule Programs Page 1 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.1 Plant and Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

6. Develop final level 2 Engineering Erdman 8/03/2011 Final level 2 schedule.

schedule Programs

7. Priority 1 proposal HDR Erdman 07/06/2011 Detailed scope and fee proposal for priority 1 structures.

8. Prepare draft report Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Draft report document plan and outline.

document plan and Programs outline Data Acquisition

9. Acquire existing Engineering Erdman 8/03/2011 Data acquired.

geotechnical and Programs structural data

10. Create shareable Engineering Erdman 8/15/2011 Database shareable by OPPD and HDR staff.

database Programs Class 1 Priority 1 Structures See Below Evaluation and Analysis

11. Review data for each Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 List of data gaps.

structure and identify data Programs gaps

12. Review structure design Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Specific methods, procedures and schedules features to assess potential Programs for each structure.

for damage due to flooding

13. Inspect structures Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Field reports.

Programs

14. Assess post-inundation Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Post inundation condition report.

condition of structures Programs

15. Prepare remediation Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Remediation alternatives report.

alternatives (if Programs appropriate)

Page 2 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.1 Plant and Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

16. Create report of findings Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Summary report Programs

17. Review findings and Engineering Erdman 9/6/2011 Meetings and documentation recommendations with Programs OPPD and document results Non-Class 1 Priority 1 See Below Structures Evaluation and Analysis

18. Review data for each Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 List of data gaps structure and identify data Programs gaps

19. Review structure design Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Specific methods, procedures and schedules features to assess potential Programs for each structure for damage due to flooding

20. Inspect structures Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Field reports Programs

21. Assess post-inundation Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Post inundation condition report condition of structures Programs

22. Prepare remediation Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Remediation alternatives report alternatives (if Programs appropriate)

23. Create report of findings Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 Summary report Programs

24. Review findings and Engineering Erdman 9/6/2011 Meetings and documentation recommendations with Programs OPPD and document results Page 3 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.1 Plant and Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable Non-Class 1 Priority 2 See below Structures Evaluation and Analysis

1. Review data for each Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 10/14/2011 List of data gaps structure and identify data Programs gaps

2. Review structure design Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 10/21/2011 Specific methods, procedures features to assess potential Programs and schedules for each for damage due to structure flooding

3. Inspect structures Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 10/28/2011 Field reports Programs

4. Assess post-inundation Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 11/04/2011 Post inundation condition condition of structures Programs report

5. Prepare remediation Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 11/20/2011 Remediation alternatives alternatives (if Programs report appropriate)

6. Create report of findings Engineering Erdman 8/8/2011 11/23/2011 Summary report Programs

7. Review findings and Engineering Erdman 11/28/2011 12/02/2011 Meetings and documentation recommendations with Programs OPPD and document results Page 4 of 5 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.1 Plant and Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable Reports and Submittals

8. Assemble final summary Engineering Erdman 12/05/2011 12/30/2011 Final summary report reflecting report Programs OPPD owner review comments

9. Establish long-term Engineering Erdman 10/15/2011 12/15/2011 Long-term monitoring plan monitoring activities Programs Page 5 of 5 Revision 0

Plant & Facility Geotechnical and Structural Assessment Priority 1 - Structures That Must Be Assessed Prior to Plant Restart Class 1 (Seismic) Structures Intake Structure Auxiliary Building Containment Rad Waste Building Technical Support Center - may not be Class 1 but was seismically designed Non-Class 1 Structures Inside PA Security Building Turbine Building Security BBREs South Switchyard Transformers (T1, T1A1, T1A2, T1A3, and T1A4) 161 kV Structures 345 kV Structures Condensate Storage Tank Underground Utilities Raw Water Piping Fire Protection System Piping Underground cable bank to Intake Structure Non-Class 1 Structures Outside PA ISFSI (Dry Fuel Strorage)

OSGS (Old Steam Generator Storage Building) - might be seismically designed Switchyard 161 kV Building 345 kV Building (west) 345 kV Building (east)

Transformers 161kV Structures 345 kV Structures Met Tower Condensate Storage Tank Demin Water Storage Tank and Pump House Underground Utilities Underground cable bank from the Switchyard to Plant

Underground cable bank from the Switchyard to Plant Priority 2 - Structures That Do Not Directly Support Plant Operation Non-Class 1 Structures Inside PA New Warehouse Chemistry/Radiation Protection Building (CARP)

Maintenance Shop Maintenance Fabrication Shop Non-Class 1 Structures Outside PA Maintenance Storage Building Old Warehouse Training Center Administrative Building Hazardous Material Storage Building Maintenance Garage Tertiary Building (Boat Storage)

Spare Transformer Pads Shooting Range Parking Lots Outdoor Concrete Slabs and Driveways Sewage Lagoons

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.2 External Flooding Barrier Configuration FOCUS AREA: Design and Licensing Basis ACTION PLAN: External Flooding Barrier Configuration ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 4.2 COMPLETION DATE: 12/16/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Steve Miller ACTION PLAN OWNER: Kevin Hyde ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flood barriers may have been affected during the 2011 flooding event or outage activities that would prevent the barriers from performing their intended function. This issue will also address the final configuration of any flood mitigation devices installed to address the 2011 flooding event.

OBJECTIVE:

Verify that the current configuration of external flood barriers is adequate to protect critical assets required to implement protective actions as described in AOP-1, Acts of Nature.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Review / observe all DEN Hyde 9/1/2011 Report documenting the results of the review external flood barrier configurations and verify that they have not been altered during flood response or outage activities

2. Issue SO-G-124, Flood PMG Bontrager 8/15/2011 EC number tracking issuance of SO-G-124; Barrier Impairment training required prior to issue of this procedure program Page 1 of 3 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.2 External Flooding Barrier Configuration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

3. Document external flood DEN Hyde 9/5/2011 Complete impairment forms in the control barrier impairments as room applicable in accordance with SO-G-124

4. Establish Program Owner Engineering Erdman 8/22/2011 Process owner for Flood Barrier Programs impairment process

5. Perform walkdown of all DEN Hyde 8/29/2011 List of flood mitigation devices and flood mitigation devices configuration disposition; Engineering (i.e., berms, sandbags, Changes to be initiated as necessary to HESCO barriers) to address final desired configuration determine if each device is to be removed or is to remain

6. Initiate actions to remove DEN Hyde 9/6/2011 Work Requests or Work orders to drive removal flood mitigation devices of temporary equipment and fixtures.

which have been determined to not be permanent fixtures.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Identify degraded flood DEN Hyde 8/15/2011 Condition Reports and work requests for each barriers degraded flood barrier

2. Repair flood barriers as Maintenance Uehling 8/15/2011 All flood barriers restored as required required Page 2 of 3 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.2 External Flooding Barrier Configuration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

3. Review restoration plans Engineering Erdman 9/5/2011 FC-1411 forms reviewed and restoration plans for each impaired flood Programs confirmed barrier per SO-G-124 form FC-1411

4. Review impaired flood OPS Pallas 9/12/2011 FC-1411 forms reviewed and barrier conditions barriers as identified in verified accordance with SO-G-124 form FC-1411

5. Removal of all flood Maintenance Uehling 9/12/2011 Temporary flood control fixtures have been mitigation devices which removed have been determined to not be permanent fixtures Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Provide technical DEN Hyde 8/8/2011 12/16/2011 Completion of CR 2010-2387 justification for qualification action items of all external flood barriers

2. Develop Engineering DEN Hyde 8/29/2011 12/16/2011 EC issued for flood control Change paperwork to measures that have been support final configuration determined to be permanent of flood mitigation barriers Page 3 of 3 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.3 Station Design Configuration Control FOCUS AREA: Design and Licensing Basis ACTION PLAN: Station Design Configuration Control ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 4.3 COMPLETION DATE: 4/15/2012 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Steve Miller ACTION PLAN OWNER: Steve Swearngin ISSUE DEFINITION:

Various configuration changes have occurred as part of flood mitigation. Tracking of configuration changes will continue throughout the flooding event to ensure that configuration control is maintained. Decisions will need to be made following the flooding regarding the final configuration required. In some instances, (e.g. earthen berm in the switchyard), it may be beneficial to leave the flood mitigation devices in place as permanent fixtures.

OBJECTIVE:

Establish final plant configuration following the 2011 Flooding event.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Finalize identification of all DEN Swearngin 6/9/2011 Listing of Configuration Changes that were configuration changes for made during flooding event restoration

2. Finalize identification of DEN Swearngin 8/31/2011 Engineering changes initiated for permanent configuration changes to changes be made permanent

3. Establish Priority/Schedule DEN Swearngin 9/2/2011 All configuration changes identified in for restoration schedule, required plant conditions for restoration identified

4. Initiate actions to remove DEN Swearngin 9/2/2011 Work documents have been initiated for non-permanent removal of non-permanent changes configuration changes Page 1 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.3 Station Design Configuration Control Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Completion of all Construction Roets 9/7/2011 Restoration of identified configuration changes ECs/restoration required for for start-up is complete plant start-up Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Complete remaining DEN Swearngin 8/31/2011 4/15/2012 Remaining configuration ECs/restoration for station changes for restoration configuration control (not complete required for start-up)

Page 2 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.4 External Flood Design Basis Review FOCUS AREA: Design and Licensing Basis ACTION PLAN: External Flood Design Basis Review ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 4.4 COMPLETION DATE: 12/9/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Steve Miller ACTION PLAN OWNER: Kevin Hyde ISSUE DEFINITION:

The station design basis needs to be reviewed with respect to the 2011 flood event to determine if changes to the design basis are appropriate based on lessons learned regarding flood character.

OBJECTIVE:

Determine if the station flood design basis is adequate to maintain nuclear safety and protect the health and safety of the public. Based on the conclusion of the assessment revise design basis, processes and procedures as appropriate.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 1 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 4.4 External Flood Design Basis Review Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable 1 Gather flood response DEN Miller 9/29/2011 11/18/2011 Recommended process and lessons learned through CR strategy changes reviews to determine if procedure or strategy changes should be implemented.

2 Review Flood Design Basis DEN Miller 6/9/2011 10/07/2011 The external flooding design and determine if the 2011 basis document was prepared flood event provides as a result of action additional information assignments in CR 2010-2387.

that should drive design This DBD has been under basis changes examination throughout the 2011 flood event. Further review will be conducted to determine if design basis changes are warranted 3 Implement procedure and DEN Miller 6/9/2011 12/09/2011 This is similar to action item 39 strategy changes as of level A CR 2010-2387 which indicated by the lessons requires implementation of learned review conducted enhanced external flooding above. procedures. This action item is due 12/09/2011 Page 2 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.1 Return Alert Notification Sirens To Functional Status FOCUS AREA: Emergency Planning ACTION PLAN: Return Alert Notification Sirens To Functional Status ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 5.1 COMPLETION DATE: 12/30/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Steve Gebers ACTION PLAN OWNER: Rhonda Hankins ISSUE DEFINITION:

Flooding conditions and power cut offs have made sirens 1, 69, 75, 76, 135, 143, 257, 259, and 260 non-functional.

OBJECTIVE:

Restore flood affected sirens to functional status.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Procure 10 Solar charging Emergency Hankins 7/14/2011 Ten solar charging kits have been ordered and kits of the nine affected Planning are expected to be delivered the first week of sirens September 2011

2. Perform fly over of flood Emergency Hankins 8/9/2011 Determine if sirens are still erect, if power affected siren to Planning cables are down, and general condition of determine status and the affected sirens potential condition of the equipment Page 1 of 3 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.1 Return Alert Notification Sirens To Functional Status Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

3. Based on siren inspection Communication Hankins 8/26/2011 Replacement equipment is available when procure replacement siren water recedes and counties allow reentry into heads, poles, electronic, flood affected areas and power supplies

4. If siren damage and or Emergency Berck 8/26/2011 Written approval by FEMA or a FEMA infrastructure is such that Planning approved plan for restoration based on timely repair of sirens is not infrastructure or resident restoration possible, work with FEMA, state and local governments for potential exemptions or long term plan

5. Replace batteries in the Communication Hankins 9/6/2011 Replace batteries when roads to sirens are affected sirens passable, allowed by county governments, and safe for the technicians

6. Install solar charging kits on Communication Hankins 9/6/2011 Install chargers when roads to sirens are the affected sirens and Blue Valley passable, allowed by county governments, and safe for the technicians

7. Conduct Siren Inspections Communication Hankins 9/6/2011 Inspect sirens per check list and restore a using the Communications power supply in preparation for testing developed check list.

8. Conduct a full siren test Emergency Hankins 9/15/2011 Perform Emergency Planning Test (EPT-3), Alert after sirens have been Planning Notification Complete Cycle Test restore to functional status Page 2 of 3 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.1 Return Alert Notification Sirens To Functional Status Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Conduct Emergency Emergency Hankins 9/6/2011 12/30/2011 Replace the signs when roads Planning Test (EPT-37), Planning to signs are passable, allowed Emergency Sign by county governments and Verification safe for the planners and maintenance

2. Establish priorities with Emergency Hankins 9/9/2011 12/30/2011 Restore AC power when roads Communications, T&D, Planning to sirens are passable, allowed Mid-American Power, and by county governments and counties for restoring AC safe for the lineman and power to the sirens technicians Page 3 of 3 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.2 Field Monitoring and Post Accident Environmental Monitoring FOCUS AREA: Emergency Planning ACTION PLAN: Field Monitoring and Post Accident Environmental Monitoring ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 5.2 COMPLETION DATE: 8/19/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Steve Gebers ACTION PLAN OWNER: Pete DeAngelis ISSUE DEFINITION:

Performing fielding monitoring and environmental sampling in flood affected sectors or through roads closed by flooding.

OBJECTIVE:

Be able to assess and determine if Protective Action Recommendations are adequate for affected sectors.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Develop a field monitoring Emergency DeAngelis 6/26/2011 Completed: Develop a sampling plan and and environmental Planning have it peer reviewed by ERO protective sampling plan measure personnel

2. Distribute Plan Emergency DeAngelis 6/26/2011 Completed: Plan was reviewed by peers and Planning is stationed at Protective Measure Emergency Response stations

3. Conduct a Protective Emergency DeAngelis 6/26/2011 During the drill, the field team monitoring plan Measure table top with the Planning will be used to walk through and sample in states of Nebraska and flood affected areas; based on critiques, the Iowa plan will be revised as appropriate Page 1 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.2 Field Monitoring and Post Accident Environmental Monitoring Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

4. Discuss the use of fly-over Emergency Gebers 5/26/2011 Completed: Discussed the potential need to sampling of flood affects Planning have DOE fly-over support in flood affected area of the EPZ with the areas if a large radiological release where to Directors of Radiological occur Health at the State of Nebraska and Iowa Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. N/A Page 2 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.3 Assessment of Offsite Emergency Response Following a Natural Disaster FOCUS AREA: Emergency Planning ACTION PLAN: Assessment of Offsite Emergency Response Following a Natural Disaster ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 5.3 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31/2011 FOCUS AREA OWNER: Steve Gebers ACTION PLAN OWNER: Allen Berck ISSUE DEFINITION:

Assess the capabilities of the offsite emergency response to respond to a radiological emergency.

OBJECTIVE:

FEMA to issue a letter of Reasonable Assurance to the NRC to allow Fort Calhoun to go critical.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. Perform ERDS testing Emergency Moeller 7/26/2011 Perform normal testing per EPT-21. Last test was Planning completed 7/29/2011 satisfactory. Test results will support EPDM-20, Assessment of Offsite Emergency Response Following a Natural Disaster, documentation Page 1 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.3 Assessment of Offsite Emergency Response Following a Natural Disaster Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

2. Perform normal Emergency Berck 7/26/2011 Perform normal testing per EPT-5 and EPT-6.

communications testing Planning Last was completed 7/28/2011 (EPT-5 & EPT-6) satisfactory. Test results will support EPDM-20 documentation

3. Restore area radiation Emergency DeAngelis 7/26/2011 Verify that the area radiation monitors have monitors Planning been repaired, calibrated, and are functional.

Results will support EPDM-20 documentation.

Write work orders and contingencies if not functional

4. Ensure effluent radiation Emergency DeAngelis 7/26/2011 Verify that the effluent radiation monitors have monitors are functional Planning been repaired, calibrated, and are functional.

Results will support EPDM-20 documentation.

Write work orders and contingencies if not functional

5. Restore equipment used Emergency DeAngelis 7/26/2011 Verify that equipment used for classification is for emergency Planning repaired, calibrated, and are functional.

classification Results will support EPDM-20 documentation.

Write work orders and contingencies if not functional

6. Perform normal facility Emergency Berck 7/26/2011 Perform normal testing per EPT-24, EPT-25, EPT-inventories and Planning 26, EPT-30, EPT-54, and EPT-55. Test results will assessments support EPDM-20 documentation

7. Conduct Meeting with Emergency Gebers 7/13/2011 Completed 7/26/2011; initial review of EPDM-FEMA, NRC, local Planning 20 check list with the organizations Emergency Manager, and State Emergency Managers Page 2 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.3 Assessment of Offsite Emergency Response Following a Natural Disaster Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

8. Submit exemption to Emergency Gebers 6/13/2011 Complete; letter has been sent to NRC.

postpone 2011 annual Planning Obtained concurrent with state and local exercise representative at the 7/26/2011 meeting.

Letters wishing to postpone were sent from the state of Iowa and Nebraska to FEMA Region IV on 7/29/2011

9. Conduct pager test per Emergency Hankins 7/26/2011 Verify that the organization is capable of EPT-34, Perform Planning staffing the ERO Augmentation or Notification Drills

10. Emergency Response Emergency DeAngelis 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for off-site and on-site Facilities Planning facilities using EPDM-20 as a guide

11. Communications Emergency Reller 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for off-site and on-site Planning communications using EPDM-20 as a guide

12. Emergency Response Emergency Reller 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for off-site and on-site Organizations Planning emergency response organizations using EPDM-20 as a guide

13. Public Alert and Emergency Reller 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for the public alerting Notification Planning systems using EPDM-20 as a guide

14. Special Needs and Emergency Reller 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for special needs Transportation Planning transportation using EPDM-20 as a guide

15. Evacuation Routes Emergency Reller 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for evacuation routes using Planning EPDM-20 as a guide

16. Accident Assessment Emergency DeAngelis 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for off-site and on-site Planning accident assessment capabilities using EPDM-20 as a guide

17. Support Services Emergency Reller 7/26/2011 Summarize findings for off-site support services Planning including fire, rescue and B.5.b. response using EPDM-20 as a guide Page 3 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.3 Assessment of Offsite Emergency Response Following a Natural Disaster Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

18. Develop a report with the Emergency Berck 7/26/2011 Gather supporting documentation from each supporting documentation Planning area assessed and maintain a restart file. Assist that can be used to assist the state and local organizations with resolving the states in writing a letter identified weaknesses. Each state to issue a of certification to FEMA letter of certification that the off-site Region IV organization is capable of responding to a radiological emergency Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Offsite Monitoring Emergency DeAngelis 7/26/2011 6/15/12 Evaluate the condition of the Locations Planning field team sample locations to determine if the topography has changed and these locations are still viable sample points. Initiate procedure and EAGLE software changes as needed Page 4 of 4 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.4 Onsite Facility and Equipment Restoration MAJOR ACTIVITY: Emergency Planning ACTION PLAN: Onsite Facility and Equipment Restoration ACTION PLAN NUMBER: 5.4 COMPLETION DATE: 12/31/2011 ISSUE OWNER: Steve Gebers ACTION PLAN OWNER: Allen Berck ISSUE DEFINITION:

Assess the capabilities of the onsite emergency response facilities and equipment for a radiological emergency.

OBJECTIVE:

Restore onsite facilities and equipment. Dates are based on expected river elevations when water is no longer on-site.

Short-Term Actions (Prior To Leaving Cold Shutdown)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. N/A Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

1. MET tower restoration System Bozarth 9/1/2011 Repair and/or replace Meteorological Engineering instrumentation

2. MET tower building Construction Brandeau 9/1/2011 Repair and/or replace the meteorological restoration tower building and air conditioning system

3. Secondary Evacuation Construction Brandeau 9/6/2011 Repair the site secondary evacuation route Route restoration Page 1 of 2 Revision 0

FCS Flooding Recovery Action Plan 5.4 Onsite Facility and Equipment Restoration Short-Term Actions (Prior To Reactor Critical)

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Deliverable

4. Critique Flooding event Emergency Berck 8/15/2011 Conduct and document flooding event Planning critique, including major procedures used to address and mitigate flooding Long-Term Actions

Action Lead Group Owner Start Date Finish Date Deliverable

1. Clean the TSC (including Construction Brandeau 9/15/2011 10/7/2011 Cleaning completed areas under the false floor, and toilets)

2. Evaluate the wiring and System Naser 9/22/2011 10/7/2011 A schedule to replace and or components under the TSC Engineering repair as needed false floor

3. Repair cracks between Construction Brandeau 9/22/2011 10/7/2011 Repairs complete floors and walls of the TSC and Auxiliary Building as necessary

4. Return TSC toilets and Maintenance Uehling 9/15/2011 10/7/2011 Services restored potable water to service Page 2 of 2 Revision 0

LIC-11-0090, Post-Flooding Recovery Action Plan

Contents

Text

References:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

LIC-11-0090, Post-Flooding Recovery Action Plan

Text

References:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search