IR 07100020/2011020

Notice of Violation from Insp on 871020-1120.Violation Noted:Station Directive 3.2.1 Not Followed in Entirety in That Technicians Restarted Procedure IP/2/A/305/3B After 2 Day Delay W/O Documenting Correct Component Verification

ML16161A920
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee, 07100020
Issue date:	12/03/1987
From:	Brownlee V NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML16161A919	List: IR 05000269/1987044 IR 07100020/2011020
References
50-270-87-44, NUDOCS 8712070138
Download: ML16161A920 (1)

Text

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket No. 50-270 Oconee Unit 2 License No. DPR-47 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

inspection conducted October 20 - November 20, 1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identifie In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:

a Technical Specification 6.4.1 states that the station shall be operated and maintained in accordance with approved procedures. Station Directive 3.2.1, Work Request Section 6.17, requires that correct component verification be performed and documented on all work requests each time a job is restarted after it is delaye Contrary to the above requirement, on October 29, 1987, Station Directive 3.2.1 was not followed in its entirety in that Instrument and Electrical technicians restarted Procedure IP/2/A/305/3B (RPS Channel "B" Calibration and Functional Test) after a two day delay without documenting correct component verificatio This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement I).

This violation applies to Unit 2 onl Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Oconee, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notic This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include:

(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieve Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response tim If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be take FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0CR IG I t;AL S 1C7.!ND DY 8712070138 871203 PDR ADOCK 05000269 PDR Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta Georgia this ?"?day of

>

1987