ML16148A640
| ML16148A640 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 03/25/1992 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16148A639 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-92-08, 50-269-92-8, 50-270-92-08, 50-270-92-8, 50-287-92-08, 50-287-92-8, NUDOCS 9204270159 | |
| Download: ML16148A640 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket Nos. 50-269, -270, and -287 Oconee 1, 2 and 3 License Nos. DPR-38, -47, and -55 During an NRC inspection conducted on February 2 -
February 29, 1992, a violation, with two examples, of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1991), the violation is.listed below:
Oconee Technical Specification (TS) 6.4.1 requires that the station be operated and maintained in accordance with approved procedures.
Procedure OP/2/A/1104/49, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP),
requires the High Pressure Injection (HPI) trains to be deactivated when LTOP is required.
Work Request 91083607-01 required that the turbine test be performed on Unit 2 using procedure IP/O/A/280/12A, Turbine and Auxiliaries Turbine Generator Trip.
Contrary to the above, these requirements were not met in that:
(1) On February 26, 1992, when the LTOP was required, the HPI system was not deactivated as required by OP/2/A/1104/49.
(2) On February 28, 1992 Instrument and Electrical (I&E) personnel performed a surveillance test on Unit 3 instead of Unit 2 as required by work request 91083607-01 causing a reactor trip on Unit 3.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company.is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a.Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 25th day of March 1992 9204270159 920325 PDR ADOCK 05000269 G