ML16148A785

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 930328-0501.Violation Noted:Scaffolding Built Such That It Blocked Movement of Positioner Feedback Arm on Feedwater Regulating Valve 2FDW-32 Controller & Resulted in Error Signal
ML16148A785
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/24/1993
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML16148A786 List:
References
50-270-93-13, NUDOCS 9306160154
Download: ML16148A785 (1)


Text

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket No. 50-270 Oconee Unit 2 License No. DPR-47 During an NRC inspection conducted on March 28 - May 1, 1993, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

Oconee Technical Specification 6.4.1 requires that the station be operated in accordance with approved procedures.

Oconee Scaffolding Manual Section 3.C requires that scaffolds must not obstruct manual or automatic movement of equipment including valves.

Contrary to the above, scaffolding was built such that it blocked the movement of the positioner feedback arm on feedwater regulating valve 2FDW-32 controller and resulted in an error signal that caused the valve to close. This resulted in emergency feedwater actuation.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 24 day of 1993 9306160154 930524 PDR ADOCK 05000269 Q

PDR