IR 05000326/2004029

Notice of Violation from Insp on 950326-0429.Violation Noted:Appropriate Measures Not Established to Assure Correction of Adverse Condition to Quality Re Inadequate Control of Load Limit Changes at Plant

ML16154A791
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee, University of California - Irvine
Issue date:	05/24/1995
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML16154A790	List: IR 05000326/2004029 ML16154A792
References
50-269-95-06, 50-269-95-6, 50-270-95-06, 50-270-95-6, 50-287-95-06, 50-287-95-6, NUDOCS 9505310071
Download: ML16154A791 (1)

Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket Nos. 50-269, 270, and 287 Oconee 1, 2, and 3 License Nos. DPR-38, 47 and 55 During an NRC inspection conducted on March 26 - April 29, 1995, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, "Corrective Action," and the licensee's Quality Assurance Program (Duke-1-A, Section 17.3.2.13)

require that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified and correcte Contrary to the above, appropriate measures were not established to assure correction of an adverse condition to quality involving inadequate control over Keowee load limit changes (Violation 50-269, 270, 287/93-20-03; dated July 20, 1993).

As a result, another change to Keowee load limits was inadequately controlled on March 15, 199 This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Oconee Nuclear Plant, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).

This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieve Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response tim Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 24th day of May 1995 ENCLOSURE 1 9505310071 950524 PDR ADOCK 05000269 PDR