IR 05000424/1986068
| ML20207L839 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 12/30/1986 |
| From: | Blake J, Novak T, Sinkule M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207L827 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-86-68, NUDOCS 8701120363 | |
| Download: ML20207L839 (39) | |
Text
, . .. -- .
i
-
p is tg, UNITED STATES - i
'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISslON
["- o,$ .
REGION 11 g ,j 101 MARIETTA STREET, * :
g ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323
%,...../
Report No: 50-424/86-68 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Docket No.: 50-424 Construction Perr.it No.: CPPR-108 Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Module: No. 18A Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Reviews Conducted: June 2 - July 31, 1986
.
On-Site Inspections Conducted: June 16-20, 1986; July 7-18, 1986 NRC Offices Participating in Inspections / Reviews:
Region II, Atlanta, GA Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), Bethesda, MD Inspectors: William P. Kleinsorge, Reactor Inspector, Region II Arthur L. Jones, Consultant, Region II (EG&G Idaho)
Reviewer: . e v NRR Approved by: /p 6 . laTce, Chief (Module - All Sections) Date Signed M er als and Process Section D vi ion of Reactor Safety, Region II kY M. V. Sinkule, Chief Se /S fo &
Date Siljned Projects Section 3C L'vis.fon of R ct r Projects, Region II I' , De'puty DirectoryLA* - bwDate'/ S'igned t- Ti>
')$ w LG T. Novak .
Division of PWR Licensing-A'
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
,
8701120363 870105 PDR ADOCK 05000424 O PDR _
. . . .. . . - -.. . - - -. . . . -. . .-
.
.
a CONTENTS
,
Topic Page
'
-
Summary 1 Scope of Review 3 Methodology 3 Evaluation 5 i Findings 13
,
Conclusions 14 RefetIeoces 16 Tai)1es 17 Acronyms 37 i
4-
.
Y
i
11 J
-, ---
r-- ,- , -, , - , ,, , - , ,+m-- , . - , - - - - - - - ,,,, - , , . - , - - - - ---g-, - - - , , ,,,,,.,-,n.-e _ wm -- ,-w m-- e m.,n -m-,---.r-.
.
.-
V0GTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM MODULE 18A HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SUMMARY Georgia Power Company (GPC) is conducting the Readiness Review Program (RRP) to assure - that all design, construction, and operational commitments have been properly identified and implemented at the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 1. Module 18A, which was submitted on November 1, 1985, presents an assessment of compliance with licensing commitments of safety related and seismic
. Category I features for design 'and construction of the Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems. The evaluation described in this report was conducted to determine whether the results of the GPC review of the HVAC systems )
presented in Module 18A represent an accurate assessment of the requirements, that the requirements were properly implemented, ar.d that the resolutions to findings were appropriat The evaluation was performed by Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II, and the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations (NRR). An additional evalua .
tion of the Independent Design Review (IDR) will be performed by the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement (IE). The NRC Region II and NRR evaluation was accomplished through a detailed examination of all sections of Module 18A by: l Verifying that commitments related to safety and seismic Category I features were identified in accordance with the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR)
and other commitment sources,. Verifying that a sample of these commitments was implemented in design and construction procedures, specifications and design criteria, Checking a representative sample of the documents reviewed within the RRP i and an independent sample of documents selected by NRC Region II, Inspecting a representative sample of equipment, ductwork and duct su currently installed in Unit 1, and supporting Quality Control (QC) .and ppor'ts Quality Assurance (QA) documentation, 5.- Reviewing results from previous NRC inspections at VEGP Unit 1 pertaining to Module 18A, Reviewing Module '18A findings and their resolutions.
- During this evaluation, it was apparent to NRC Region II that GPC management supports the RRP by active participation in the development and implementation of the program. This evaluation also indicates that the applicant's program review was comprehensive and provides adequate assurance that, except for several l
i
.
.-
findings identified by NRC Region II, HVAC systems for the VEGP Unit 1 are in accordance with NRC requirements and FSAR commitments. The findings are subject to continuing review until proper resolution has been received. The findings identified during this evaluation are summarized in the sevan items listed below:
o Deficiency - Failure to procure HVAC systems that were fabricated, in-stalled, and inspected in accordance with procedures and drawings, (Violation 50-424/86-59-01)
o Deficiency - Failure to procure explosion-proof fan motors as committed (Deviation 50-424/86-59-02)
o Deficiency - Failure to install electrically interlocked and alarmed control room access doors as committed, (Deviation 50-424/86-59-03) and design control for control room doors (Unresolved Item 50-424/86-59-04)
o Deficiency - Unidentified Commitments - FSAR Section 9.4.5.5.F, (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-05) - FSAR Section 6.2.5.1.3.D (Inspector Follow-up Item 50-424/86-59-06) - FSAR Section 6.4.2.2.2.J (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-07) -
FSAR Section 6.4.2.2.2.L (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-08) - FSAR Section 6.4.2.2.2.N (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-09) -
FSAR Section 6.5.1.1.E (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-10) - FSAR Section 6.5.1.3.E (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-11) - FSAR Section 9.4.6.1.2. A (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-12)
o Deficiency - Inadequate Implementation for Component Reference No. 4073 (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-13)
o Deficiency -
HVAC Specification Error (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-14)
o Deficiency -
Deleted FSAR Commitment (Inspector Followup Item 50-425/86-56-02)
The foregoing do not appear to represent significant programmatic weaknesse This conclusion is reached under the condition that these open items for VEGP Unit 1 can be satisfactorily close Resolutions to all open items will be handled during future NRC Region II inspections.
-_ . _ . _- -_ _
, - - __ _ -- - -
. - - - _- .
. . .-
V0GTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM MODULE 18A HEATING, VENTILATION-'AND AIR CONDITIONING
- Scope of Review This. review consisted of an examination of each section of the module and was performed by NRC Region II along with reviewers from NRR. An additional review of Section 7, IDR, will be performed later by the IE. The Region II review was assisted by one employee from EG&G Idaho, Inc., a prime contrac-tor to the U.S. Department of Energy at the Idaho National Engineering
- Laborator Module 18A, Sections 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 presented data on module
'
organization.. project. organization, program description, audits and special investigations and conclusions. These did not require as extensive a review as that given Module 18A Sections 3 and 6, which covered commitments and program verification. The latter two sections contain the more significant aspects of the program relating to licensing commitments. These include comitment identification, commitment implementation, and technical adequacy of the design in nueting the comitments. The evaluation of these two sections included an examination of content, review of findings and conclu-sions, review of a sample of items previously reviewed in the RRP and review of an independently selected sample of documents and field constructio The. review of Module Section 7, IDR, is the subject of a separate repor The methodology used in an evaluation of each section is presented in the following tex ; Methodology Region II Review The NRC review, performed by Region II, was concerned with all sections of the module except Section 7, but focused on Subsections 3.5, 6.1 and
,
6.2. The entire Module was read and reviewed for organization and
- content after its receipt in November 1, 198 Region II further reviewed Module 18A by conducting two on-site inspec-
- tions at VEGP Unit The first inspection was made during the period of June 16-20, 1986, l
.
and is further discussed in NRC Report 50-424/86-56. This involved the
'
following activities: j o Reviewing the description of the RRP and establishing organization !
resp:nsibilities for Module 18A, l 0 Verifying Module 18A review boundaries, o Evaluating Sections 3 and 6 of Module 18 for proper identification of licensing and project commitments, ,
,
l
.
,. ., ,,r, - . , - . - _ _ _ . , . ,,e,-- e,r .-r--r--,m-e-~t- t rr, -e-- wr - - r = ,---,m.-<%--em.5,2,m-mr,-- ww--=
. .- - - .. - .- . .. - - . . - .. .
.
.-
,
o Selecting a sample' of commitments to _ be used. as a. basis for verifying. implementation of licensing and project commitments into the design and conAtruction procedures and design criteria, o Selecting a sample of specifications and design criteria and other
-
standards to be used-in the assessment of Subsections 6.1 and 6.2'
of Module 18A,
.
o Evaluating Sections 3, 6 and 9 of tne FSAR for proper identifica-tion of licensing and project commitment . The second on-site inspection was conducted during the period of 1 July 7-18, 1986, and is further discussed in NRC Report 50-424/86-59.
'
-
l
.
This included the following activities: ,
,
o Completing the verification of commitment implementation into design and construction programs,
!
! o Accomplishing general Module 18A review activities, ;
- o Performing a Design Program Verification (DPV) review, o Performing a Construction Program Verification (CPV) revie Of the 285 commitments identified in Module 18A, an 84 comitment sample was traced for implementation into the first-order documents
'
. listed in the implementation matrix of Module 18A. Thirty of these '
commitments were also' traced for implementation into second-order
-
documents (calculations, drawings,etc.)orfieldinstallations.
'
General review activities included an assessment of the information -
- presented in Sections 1. 2, 4, 5 and 8 of Module 18A. Questions i concerning these sections of the Module were discussed with RRP
!. personnel.
An evaluation of the DPV was made by reviewing a portion of the calcu-
, lations, specifications, and drawings for the equipment and components
!- selected for the field inspection. These calculations, specifications, drawings and related design criteria, drawings, and change documenta-tion were reviewed for adequacy of design control, adherence to crite-ria and procedures, and design integrity.
- An evaluation of the CPV was made by performing a field inspection of a sample of_HVAC equipment, dampers, ductwork, duct supports, and instru-
,
mentation and controls. In addition to this field inspection, the sample of equipment and components was reviewed for conformance to specifications and procedures, and for compliance with design drawings.
,
t
-, -
.
.-
3 NRR Review NRR's review of the Vogtle Readiness Review Module 18A, HVAC was initiated by a review of the Commitment Matrix (Section 3.4). The review consisted of a comparison of the commitments listed in Section 3.4 and with the guidance contained in the Standard Review Plan (SRP) and other regulatory documents (SE, FSAR, and Generic Letters).
The staff also reviewed the commitments to ensure that all commitments necessitated by the SRP were included in the Readiness Review Program (all modules). Since no questions or clarifications were found, an evaluation was performed based on the results of the initial revie IE Review The review and evaluation by the Office of Inspection and Enforcement focused on the Independent Design Review (IDR) product which was not included in Section 7.0 of the Module. This was reported in Module 22 as a part of the integrated IDR. The results of the review of this by IE personnel will be the subject of a separate report.
3. Evaluation The evaluation of each Module section is provided below in the section-by-section format used in Module 18A. Included are a description of the section, subject matter reviewed, basis for acceptance, and statement of required followup or evaluatio Section 1--Introduction (1) Review Introduction and Section Examinatio This section presents the scope of Module 18A, lists the key hardware and work activities included, outlines the Module organization, and reports the project status. The section was examined by NRC Region II for appropriateness of scope and for background information. Addi-tionally, the Module boundaries were clarified and project status was assesse (2) Boundary Definition. Table 1.1-1 of Module 18A lists the hardware and associated work activities for modules that have HVAC aspect Module 18A included those activities which are safety and seismic Category I related. Other Modules were given the responsibility for design and/or construction of fire dampers (Module 188);
chilled water system equipment and piping; and containment pene-trations (Module 4); HVAC control board (Modules 20 and 6); HVAC wire and connections (Module 12); and tubing (ASME and seismic Category I) - (Modules 4 and 20).
NRC Region 11 found the description of Module 18A boundaries to be acceptabl . . - _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . . . _ _ _ _ .- .. - -. _ _. - -
- . - _ _ . . . -
p ,
.-
. ,
l
'
4 4
(3) Project Status. Subsection 1.3 of-the Module present's the project F status for installation of HVAC ductwork on a building by building basi Percentages of completion were quoted as of November 1
,
198 .
<
These percentages were revised as of May 25, 1986, to show 100%
completion for installation of all HVAC ductwor ,
+
NRC Region II determined that the project status indicated satis-
- factory completion of HVAC ductwork installation by the target date of May 198 ~
- Section 2--Organization and Division of Responsibility ,
Tilis section describes the organization involved in design and con-struction for Module 18A. It explains what personnel are responsible for specific ~ design and construction activities, and presents the
'
matrix ' organization - used by the architect / engineering contractor, Bechtel. Power Corporation (BPC), on the projec r This section.was reviewed by NRC Region II for content and accurac In the process of this review, the responsibilities of the various organizations and personnel within the organizations were clarified.
NRC Region II had no findings in this sectio Section 3--Comitments l (1) Review Introduction and Section Examination.- This section con-tains listings of commitments and implementing documents, which
] are displayed in two matrices. The first matrix, entitled "Com-
- mitments", identifies 285 Module 18A comitments and their source
>
document The second matrix, entitled " Implementation", lists the document or plant feature for each comitment, as discussed in-i the source document, and the project document in which the comit- !
J ment is implemented. The NRR review of tne comitment matrix was L
!
directed toward assuring that all regulatory requirements relating
'
to HVAC safety and seismic Category I features within the scope of Module 18A were included and properly identified. The NRC Region II review was directed toward verifying the proper imple-mentation of the listed commitments. The latter was accomplished
,
by selecting a sample of 84 comitments representing the range of commitment topics. Each sample comitment was. examined by review-ing the comitment source document for the precise requirement and
+
the listed implementation document (in the implementation matrix)
.
for accurate carry through of the requiremen .
(2) Identification Revie !
.
o The NRC Region II review of FSAR Sections 3, 6 and 9 and the i Module 18A cemitment matrix indicated that nine GPC commit-ments had beo omitted from the commitment matrix. Eight of
i
_- . . . . _ . _ . _ . . -. _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ . . . . _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - - , _ _ _ _
.
.-
the omitted commitments were unidentified by RRP (Inspector Followup Items 50-424/86-59-05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11 and 12), also identified as finding No. One of the omitted commitments had been inadvertently dropped from the FSAR during a subsequent revision (Inspector Followup ltem 50-424/86-56-02), identified as finding No. In addition, one commitment was inadequately referenced by GPC (Inspector Followup Item 50-424-59-13), identified as finding No. 5; one was incorrectly referenced by GPC [ Discussed in Report 50-424/86-59 Paragraph 6b(5); one commitment had an incorrect reference in a specification (Inspector Followup Item 50-424/86-59-14), identified as finding No. o The NRR examination of Section 3.0 started with a reading of the Module for commitmen The Commitment Matrix in Module 18A consists of 285 commitments related to safety-related and seismic Category I HVAC items including ducts, duct supports, fans, dampers, cooling units and filtration units, chilled water equipment, containment penetration design, and local /in-line instruments. Other aspects of the HVAC systems including fire dampers, piping and most of the HVAC control (evaluated in Modules 4, Mechanical Equipment and Piping; 6, Electric Equiment; 12, Electrical Cables; 18B, Fire Dampers; and 20, Instrumentation and Controls). The systems involved in the HVAC Commitment Matrix of Module 18A are, containment cooling, containment purge, combustible gas control, post LOCA hydrogen purge, habitability systems including control room HVAC, ESF filter system, fuel handling building HVAC, auxiliary building ESF HVAC, radwaste building HVAC, electrical penetration HVAC, ESF electrical equipment room HVAC, containment HVAC, AFW pump house HVAC and miscel-laneous HVAC systems for electrical tunnels, and piping penetration areas of the equipment buildin The staff review of Commitments in Section 3.4 resulted in no staff questions or clarifications for Module 18A, HVA (3) Implementation Revie The NRC Region II inspection consisted of a review of Subsections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 for content and an evaluation of 84 commitments (among the 285 listed in Sub-section 3.4) for comitment implementatio The commitments selected represent the range of commitment topics and commitment
.
.-
.
sources present in Module 18 The examination of the sample consisted of:
o Verifying that the Subsection 3.4 commitment matrix corre-lates with the Subsection 3.5 implementation matrix for each commitment in the sampl o Reviewing the source documents referenced in the commitment matrix for a clear statement of requirement for each commitmen o Verifying that the document listed in the implementation matrix properly implements the requirement as stated in the source document for each commitmen The sample of commitments reviewed and the review results are listed in Table 1 of this repor Three questions raised during the review of commitment implementa-tion are yet to be resolved (Unresolved Item 50-424/86-59-04,and Deviation Nos. 50-424/86-59-02 and 03) identified as findng Nos. 2 and Section 4--Program Description (1) Review Introduction and Section Examinatio This section describes procedures and program control for design; equipment and material; site materials; fabrication, installation, and inspec-tion. The section was examined by NRC Region II for content and background information. Some of the background was useful in the review of later sections in the Module, especially Section 6, Program Verificatio (2) Design. Subsection 4.1 divides a description of the design
, program into several categories including the design process; design criteria for mechanical HVAC systen s; design documentation; design control and review; and design change control. This subsection describes the design program from its earliest phase of design criteria development to its final phase of design program verificatio The NRC Region II review of this subsection revealed that the information presented therein gave a descriptive accounting of the design process and defined the divisions of responsibility between BPC and GPC in HVAC system activities. It also explained the interfaces between engineering groups involved in the design effort. The information proved useful for developing an under-standing of the design program but did not lend itself to a detailed review. NRC Region II identified no deficiencies in the
'
design program described in this subsection. Results from the
'
. ..
- - _ _ - _ -_ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ . - . - - . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ . . - _ _ _ .
.
.-
review of Section 6 of Module 18A were used to determine how effectively the program actually functione '
(3) Equipment and Materials. Subsection 4.2 describes the process for procuring safety-related HVAC equipment and components or the material used to fabricate these items. GPC serves as the pur-chasing agent for these items and supplies them to the contractors for installatio This subse: tion refers to Module 21 Appen-dices C and E for a detailed description of the procurement proces These appendices were not examined in the NRC Region II review of Module 18A, but several procurement documents were inspected in the review of the CPV described in Paragraph 3.h of this repor No deficiencies were identified in this review of the procurement proces (4) Trainin Subsection 4.3 describes training, qualification requirements, and programs for engineering and construction personnel performing activities related to the HVAC systems. The overall training program includes training in the quality pro-gram; engineering indoctrination program; Project Reference Manual ,
(PRM); technical and specialized training; new arrival orienta-tion; and the quality concern program. Discussion of the material contained in the subsection with RRP did not disclose information different from that presented or from that gained by inspectors during past inspection (5) Fabrication, Installation and Inspection. Subsection 4.4 contains a brief description, flowchart, and list of procedures and speci-fications applicable to fabrication, installation and inspection work pertaining to HVAC equipment, components and materials. The material in this subsection is generally descriptive and was not assessed in detail by NRC Region II. The material presented does indicate that the basic installation program addresses project requirements. Results from the review of Module 18A Section 6 were used to determine howe effectively the program actually functioned. NRC Region II had no findings relative to the de-scription of this subsectio Section 5--Audits and Special Investigations This section discusses quality assurance audits and evaluations that have been performed by GPC, BPC and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) addressing the area of HVA The findings resulting from design program audits occurred in the areas of document control, QA records, fabrication, training / qualification, and inspection. All of the design activity phases were given detailed evaluation in the RRP verification of the design program in Module 18A, Subsection 6.1. The findings resulting from construction audits were all evaluated for importance by the RRPT. The CPV in Module 18A, Subsection 6.2, was designed to include all areas where past findings
.
-w - a m - - , -- - - -
. . -- . - - - ... _ - . .
,
.
-
.
.
of high or moderate importance occurred. The listing of NRC Region II i outstanding items was used as benchmark to check the RRP data base for Audits and Special Investigations. NRC Region II concluded that findings from previous audits and investigations were thoroughly considered in the RRP assessments for Module 18A. NRC Region II had no findings in this sectio P' Section 6--Program Verification This section of Module 18A describes activities undertaken to ascertain whether design. and construction work processes were adequately con- '
trolled to ensure implementation of licensing comitments and confor-mance with project procedures and design requirements. The section is divided into two subsections covering DPV and CPV. NRC Region II performed detailed evaluations of both subsections, which are described under the following two headings in this report. Subsection 6.1--Design Program Verification (1) Review Introduction. The DPV performed within the RRP focused on
] the programatic aspects of design. It included an assessment of '
l design processes and a review of design documents for implementa-tion of licensing comitment The RRP review was performed in 2 two subsections. The first subsection consisted of verifying implementation of all technical comitments with Module 18A.
i Source documents (such as the FASR) were reviewed to identify i project comitments regarding HVAC safety and seismic Category I
- design activitie Design criteria documents then were reviewed
'
for implementation of these comitments.
.
A selected sample of commitments were further reviewed for imple-mentation into second-order design documents such as calculations, drawings and specifications. The second subsection consisted of a
- programatic verfication of the design control-process through a
- review of second-order design documents for conformance to project
'
procedures and quality assurance requirements. Emphasis was
placed on the areas of design control, internal and external
! design coordination, adherence to design criteria, procedural
! compliance and design documentation.
i (2) Subsection 6.1.2 Comitment Implementation I The NRC Region II examination of the DPV began with a selatction of 84 commitments from the ?85 listed in Subsection 3.4 of
-
Module 18 The comitment selection was as described in Para-i graph 3.c(3) of this report. The comitment sample and results of the review are listed in Table 1 of this report.
!
!
i
a...., . -- ,-_n,,.....,._-- ,,,,.---.-..,_nm.,,,, ,..~-,n , , , , _ , , ._,--.n,.,n,.,,__,,_,,, . , _ , ,m,, , . , ,, ,. - . ,
. . _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ . _ , ._,
.___ . _ _ _
.
.
.
e
(a) First-Order Commitment Implementation For 64 of the 84 commitments selected for review, the comit-ments were readily found to be implemented in documents identified in the Subsection 3.5 implementation matrix. The
~
remaining 20 commitments required some form of clarification to show that the implementation was consistent with the commitment requirement. There are four questions relative to three of these comitments which are yet to be resolve (Deviation 50-424/86-59-02, and Inspector Followup Items 50-424/86-59-05,13 and 14) identified as finding Nos. 2, 4, 5 and (b) Second-Order Comitment Implementation Of the 84 comitments in the review sample, 30 were evaluated for implementation into second-order documents (design calculations, construction procedures, etc.). The documents used in the evaluations are contained in Table 1 of this repor In all cases, NRC Region II determined that the comitments were implemented in the second-order documents reviewed. The second-order document listed in Table 1 for each of these 30 comitments may represent only one instance of implementation for that document. Numerous other applica-tions to other commitments could exis (3) Subsection 6.1.3 Programatic Verification of the Design Control Process The RRP verification of comitment implementation into second-order documents is summarized in Tables 6.1-1 through 6.1-7 in Module 18 A sampling of second-order documents was taken from each of the tables, reviewed and the implementation trace Independent samples were also taken by NRC Region II. A listing of all second-order documents verified is given in Tables 3 through 8 of this repor NRC Region II concluded that the second-order commitment verification program was acceptabl (4) Findings Subsection 6.2 of Module 18A pm sented eight findings disclosed by the RRPT. Of those findings, three findings were found during verification of licensing commitment implementation. The remain-ing five findings were identied during the programatic revie Five of the findings were identified as Level II the remaining three as Level II All eight findings were given a detailed evaluation by NRC Region II. The examination of Readiness Review Findings in the DVP disclosed no verificaton error . . . _ _ - _
. - . - . _ . . . . . - - .- - -. .. -__
..
-
.
t
'
- Subsection 6.2--Construction Program Verification
(1) Review Introduction and Subsection Examination. The CPV performed by RRPT consisted of an evaluation of completed HVAC system l ' installation, associated documentation, procedures, specifica-tions, vendor instructions and installation of duct supports. The program had the objective of determining whether the construction control process functioned effectively and whether -it ensured f acceptable HVAC system installations.
! (2) Program Examination. The assessments made and conclusions reached i in RRP's verification program were divided. into the following major categories:
o Commitment Implementation, o Construction Assessment,
,
- Hardware Items, j -
Programmatic Activities.
- All of the foregoing topics were examined in the NRC Region II
. review and are reported as follow (a) Commitment Implementation
.'l NRC Region II performed verification of commitment implemen-
tation on all five of the five construction-related commit-ments listed in the commitment matrix of Module 18A. The
- commitments verified were 863, 331, 4015, 4096 and 4973. The results of this effort are included in Table 1 of this
, repor As indicated, commitments 331, 4096 and 4015 were verified for implementation into both first- and second-order document NRC. Region II identified no deficiencies in
- construction related commitment (b) Construction Assessment The RRPT made an assessment of 18 duct sections,18 duct i supports 6 pieces of equipment, eight instruments and con-trols,17 dampers (five by actual walkdown) five sets of j
'
drilled-in anchors, and programmatic activities that included ten inspector certifications, five welders qualifications, 25 Deviation Reports (DR's), four pieces of measuring and test
- equipment, ten material receipts and review of 30 procedures.
\
! NRC Region II made a construction assessment of 23 duct -
- sections (four assessed by RRP), nine duct supports (four i assessed by RRP), four pieces of equipment (two assessed by RRP), four dampers (two assessed by RRP), three sets of l drilled-in anchors (two assessed by RRP) and programmatic activities that include six inspector certifications, three i
. - _ . . _ - - _
_-. . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - , , _ _ . . _ . _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ . _ , , . . _ , _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , , . . _ . . . . _ , . _ . . , _ , _
_ . _
. . . - . . .- - . - -- .-- . - - . .. - .- -
..
.
.
.
11 %
.
welder qualifications, 25 DR's, material receipt for all duct
.
supports examined by NRC Region II and review of nine L procedures.
'
The hardware assessed and associated 26 findings indentified are indicated in Table 2, the DR's reviewed are identified in Table The hardware assessed included 47 individual itens, -12 of i which exhibited 27 deficient conditions. The 27 deficient conditions went undetected by the HVAC contractor's, crafts-men and inspectors, Pullman /Kenith-Fortson (P/K-F), as well
'
as the GPC inspectors that accepted the HVAC systems from
. P/K- In addition four. of the 12 items with deficient -
conditions were inspected by the RRPT, who did not identify
~
,
any of the associated deficient conitions. .The above clearly
indicates a weakness related to identification of deficient
- conditions during walkdown inspections. This will be identi-
fied as Finding No. 1 (Violation 50-424/86-59-01).
(c)~ Findings-Subsection 6.2 of Module 18A presented 20 findings disclosed by
'
i the RRPT. Of these findings one was identified during canmitment implementation assessment, and 19 were identified during construc-
- tion assessmen Four of the findings were identified as Level II i and the remaining 16 as Level III. All 20 findings were given a l detailed evluation by NRC Region I The examination of the j Readiness Review Findings in the CVP disclosed no verification errors.
,
l Section 7--Independent Design Review
<
The results of the Independent Design Review (IDR) were not included in Module 18 A brief narrative of the IDR process was provided. This included a statement that an independent engineering consulting company had made a review of the design documents (such as design criteria, calculations, specifications and drawings) to ascertain whether these
,
documents correctly implemented licensing commitments. A team of technical and professional experts assessed the adequacy of the design work for this Module while assessing that for other Modules. The product of this review is included in Module 2 The integrated IDR has been examined by the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement. The results of this NRC examination is the subject of a separate repor j . Section 8--Program Assessment / Conclusions This section presents a summary of open corrective actions on RRP findings, several certifications and acceptances of the Module, and
brief resumes for the RRPT members. The section does not contain any introductory explanations as to the significance of the information i
i
,
m ,-,ymv.,-,. ,-m.s-nna,. - , e- en.,_n_ - - . , , - , , - - - - - - , - . - , - - - . , , - , - - , , - , - , , , - - .-,.,..n- -- ---,...--,n
. . . . - . . . . . . -_- _ -. -
..
,
, , ..
,~
presented, which is somewhat contrary to the previous sections of the
. Modul .
- NRC Region II and NRR staff review, of this section, included reading
. for content and background information. .The open corrective actions
-
f identified therein were evaluated for completeness and consistency with the finding descriptions given in Module 18A, Section 6. No findings were identified in the corrective action The NRR staff review of Section 8.0 of Module 18A has determined that
,- ~ ; as of FSAR Amendment No. 24, the applicant has not met the identified completion date for FSAR revisions. However, the staff' concurs with
'
the proposed FSAR revisions and other corrective actions identified in
.
Section 8.0 of Module 18 . Findings The following seven findings were identified during the NRC evaluation of Module 18A. All of the deficiencies noted are considered to have potential
.
safety significance at this point of review and should be evaluated further
.
to preclude safety- problems. These have been identified as Violations-(VIOL), . Deviations (DEV), Unresolved Items (UNR), or Inspector Followup Items (IFI) depending on the nature of the followup action required. These will also be addressed by the NRC during the routine inspection program.
i Deficiency - (Viol 50-424/86-59-01) - Failure to procure HVAC systems c .c that were' fabricated installed and inspected in accordance with proce-dures- and drawing Details for this one provided in para-
^
graph 3.h(2)(3) and Table . Deficiency - (DEV 50-424/86-59-02) - Failure to procure explosion proof fan motors as committed. Details for this are provided in para-graphs 3.c(3) and 3.g(2)(a).
, Deficiency - (DEV 50-424/86-59-03) - Failure to install electrically interlocked and alarmed control room doors as commited; and (UNR 50-424/86-59-04) - Design control for control room doors. Details for this are provided in paragraph 3.c(3).
' Deficiency -
(IFI 50-424/86-59-05 through 50-424/86-59-12) eight unidentified commitments. Details are provided in paragraphs 3.c(2)
and3.g(2)(a).
.~ ' Deficiency - (IFI50-424/86-59-13) Inadequate implementation for ,
reference No. 4073. Details are provided in paragraphs 3.c(2) and 3.g(2)(a).
,
! 6.- Deficiency - (IFI 50-424/86-59-14) HVAC specification erro Details
- are provided in paragraphs 3.c(2) and 3.g(2)(a).
i I
.
mo_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ ___ _______ __________ _ __________ ____ ___ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ .
_
..
..
13 Deficiency - (IFI 50-424/86-56-02) Deleted FSAR commitmen Details are provided in paragraph 3.c(2). Conclusions Based upon the review within the scope of this module, the NRC has reached the following conclusions'for safety-related and seismic category 1 features of HVAC systems for VEGP Unit ' Summary of Specific Conclusions With the exceptionsof those items / areas discussed earlier the following has been determined to be acceptabl (1) Section 1.0 - Boundaries - The content of Module 18A and the boundaries between other modules as given in Section 1 were reviewed and found to be complete and definitiv (2) Section 2.0 - Organization - The description of the organization and responsibilities for project activities as given in Section 2 was reviewed and found to be accurate and to include the pertinent activities for design and field constructio (3) Section 3.0 - Commitments - The commitments as given in Module 18A Section 3 were reviewed and determined to be complete. With exception of deficiencies identified in paragraph 4 of this report for commitments 2026, 4073 and 4084 and eight commitments not identified from the FSAR by RRP, the licensing commitments and implement documents were determined to be in compliance with the FSAR, the SRP and industry codes and standard (4) Section 4.0 - Program - The description of the program as given in Section 4 of Module 18A was reviewe The following areas were examined:
l
-
Design
!
- Equipment and Materials
-
Training and Qualification
- Fabrication, Installation and Inspection The program description was determined to be correct and in agreement with FSAR and requirement (5) Section 5.0 - Audits and Special Investigations - Section 5 of Module 18A on audits was reviewed and determined to be an accurate presentation of the audit process and previously identified construction problems and NRC inspection result (6) Section 6.0 - Program Verification - GPC performed a program verification in 'two parts; a design program verification and a construction program verificatio Construction verification
, .
. _ _ -_
. ..
____________________ . .
.
.
included a walkdown of HVAC equipment and components within the scope of Module 18A and a review of the project documentation with respect to HVAC system The design process verification examined the implementation within the design documents of all licensing commitments which were identified as having design cognizance. This was completed in two subsection Subsection 6.1.2 includes verification of all commitments into project design criteria or other procedures considered as first order design documents. A selected portion was further reviewed for implementation into specific second order design documents including calculations and drawings. Subsection 6.1.3 consisted of the examination of selected second order design documents for conformance with project procedures and quality assurance requirement The construction program verification consisted of an evaluation of compited HVAC systems and consisted of an examination of the implementation of all licensing commitments which were identified as having construction cognizance, a review of construction program and procedures, and a field walkdown of 47 items of equipment and ductwork to verify their conformance with appropri-ate design drawings, construction specifications, and installation procedures and accuracy of construction quality assurance documen-tatio One finding was identified during the construction program verification shown in Section 4 of this repor (7) Section 7.0 - Independent Design Review - GPC contracted an outside organization, S&W, to perform an IDR for Module 18A. This review was perfonned to assess the technical adequacy of the Module 18A related design for VEGP Unit 1. The IE examination of the IDR will focus on determining whether a thorough review had been performed and whether conclusions were appropriate relative to the findings reporte This will be accomplished during the review of Module 22, " Independent Design Review."
(8) Program Assessment / Conclusions - This section presents a summary of open corrective actions on RRP findings, several certifications and acceptances of the Module and brief resumes for the RRPT
members. The section does not contain any introductory explana-tions as to the significance of the information presented, which is somewhat contrary to the previous sections of the Modul The NRC Region II review of this section included reading for content and background information. The open corrective actions identified therein were evaluated for completeness and consistency with the finding descriptions given in Module 18A Section 6. No findings were identified in the corrective action ..
..
15 General Conclusions The examination performed by NRC indicated that this module presents an adequate assessment of the GPC process for design, fabrication, instal-lation and inspection of safety-related and seismic Category 1 features of HVAC systems for VEGP Unit 1.
, GPC's management supported the RRP by active participation and adequate resources. There was no evidence of coercion or attempt to dilute either the effort or the findings. The Readiness Review Staff dis-played the requisite, competence and professionalism for a review of this natur The review performed by the RRP Staff was determined to be sufficiently comprehensive in scope and depth to identify problem areas, and the dispositions of findings determined to be adequate. The procedures for design, engineering, construction, and quality control for the appli-cants program was comprehensive and provides adequate assurance that activities associated with HVAC systems, were determined to be consis-tent with commitments and are acceptable. Based on the review of this module, it appears that construction was performed in accordance with the appropriate procedures and that records reflect the quality of that constructio With exception of the seven deficiencies reported in Section 4, the NRC findings appear to have minor significance and do not appear to repre-sent significant programmatic weaknesses. The deficiencies must be further evaluated to determine their significance and need for any subsequent corrective action Pending resolution of the findings identified above, the NRC concludes that the VEGP Unit 1 program for safety-related and seismic Category 1 features of HVAC systems complies with NRC requirements and FSAR commitments. This conclusion is based on information currently avail-able to the inspectors and reviewers. Should subsequent contradictory information become available it will be evaluated to determine what effect it may have on the above conclusio . References Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 1, Readiness Review, Module 18 A - Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditionin . Letter from D. O. Foster, Vice President and Project General Manager, Vogtle Project, Georgia Power Company, forwarding Module 18A for NRC evaluation, March 24, 198 . Letter from D. O. Foster, Vice President and Project General Manager, Vogtle Project, Georgia Power Company, identifying Amendment 1 to Module 18A, April 17, 198 _ _, . _ _ _ . . - _ _
_ ___ -_ _ - _ _ _
TABLE 1 COMMITPENT VERIFICATION .
.
Commitment verified First R:f N Source Commitment Section Commitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents verified Second Order Documents-1487 FSAR 1.2. Containment Cooling Reduce Post Accident Yes Spec. X4AJ34 System Sizing Containment Pres To Less Than or equal to 50% of Peak Pres w/in 24 hr FSAR 1.1.12.1. Single Failure, IEE 279-1971 Yes Spec. X4AJ07 Redundancy and indep'ce
Criteria 1550 FSAR 1.9.52 Design Test and ANSI N510-1980 Yes Spec. X4AJ06 Maintenance for ESF Air Filtration and Absorption Units 172 FSAR 1.9.89 Qualification for RG 1.89, Rev. O.11/74 Yes Class IE Equipment 1595 FSAR 1.9.141 Containment Isolation RG 1.141, Rev. O, 4/78 Yes Ven. Dwg. AX4AJI6-2-7 Provisions for Fluid DR's 10-0398 & ID-0399 Syst.
I 2026 FSAR 3. Allowance of Periodic 10 CFR 50, APP. A, GDC 61 Yesd Leak Rate Testing to Ensure Within Limits 863 FSAR 3.2.2-1 Principal Codes and ANSI M509, 1976 Air Yes Standards for T.3.2.2-1 Cleaning Units and Components 924 FSAR Missile Protection 10 CFR 50, APP. A, GDC 4 Yes 983 FSAR 3.7. Cat.1 Structure, RG 1.29 Yes Spec. X4AJ01; DR 50-216 System and Component Classification 1202 FSAR 3.10. Seismic Qual, and IEEE 344-1975 Yes FCR 1094F Documentation for Safety Related Equipment and Supports 1306 FSAR Engineered Safety 10 CFR 100 Yes Features 331 FS*R 6.1.1. ESF Construction Mat'Is ASPE III & IX Yes'
Weld Mat'l Qualif'n
. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ _ _ _
,
-
TABLE I (Continued) *
.
COMMITE NT VERIFICATION ,
Commitment Vertfled First .
RIf N Source Commitment Section Comnitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents verified Second Order Document FSAR 6.1.1. ESF Const. Mat'l - Cold Limited to Maximum of Yese Worked Austenitic ,000 pst yield strength 2511 FSAR 6.2.2.1. Containment Cooling Limit Ambient Containment Yes System Design Bases Air Temp. To 120 F With Any 4 of 8 Coolers Operating 2408 FSAR 6.2.4.1.1. Containment isolation ASME III, Class 2 Yes'
System Safety Design Basas 2053 FSAR 6.2.4. Containment Isolation Preaccess Purge Supply Yes'
System. Design And Exhaust Valves in Evaluation 24" Lines Are Designed To Shut in Less Than 10 Se FSAR 6.2. Containment isolation ASE XI Yes System. Tests and Inspection 2072 FSAR 6.2.5. Post LOCA Cavity Purge Designed to Seismic Yes'
System Category 1 2447 FSAR 6.2.5. Post LOCA Cavity Purge Each Fan is Powered From Yes Spec. X4AJ34 System An Independent Class IE Power Supply 2092 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, RG 1.52 Yese Spec. X4AJ06 Vent'n Filter Housings 2091 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability System Filter Unit Housing Are Yes Spec. X4AJ06 Vent'n System Design Seismic Category 1 2093 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, RG 1.52 Yes Vent'n Moisture Separator 2094 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, ANSI M509 Yes Vent'n Electric Heaters
2095 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, MIL-F-51068 Yes'
Vent'n HEPA Filters .
- ,
i
{ .__
.
TABLE 1 (Continued)
COfMITENT VERIFICATION *
.
Comitment Verified First R;f N Source Comitment Section Commitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents Verified Sect nd Order Documents 2098 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, Designed to Seismic Ves Vent'n Cooling Coll Category 1 2099 FSAR 6.4.2.2.2 F Habitability Systems, ASME Section lit. Class 3 Yes Spec. X4AJ06 Vent'n Cooling Coll 2100 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, Seismic Category 1 Yes Vent'n Emergency Filter Train Fans 2101 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, RG 1.52 Yes Vent'n Emergency Filter ,
Train Fans 2102 F SAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability System Seismic Category 1 Yes Emergency Control Room Return Fan 2103 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability System Seismic Category 1 Yes FCR's 1094F; 12,332; 11,383 Vent'n Ductwork and 101F; 12,165; 546; Dampers 2249F; 01F; 2038F; 1129F; 744F; 4135; 4156; 3223; 10,877 DR SR-0045 2104 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, RG 1.52 Yes'
Vent'n Doctwork and Dampers 2105 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, Capable of Closing Within Yes Vent'n isolation 6 Seconds of Receiving Dampers Actuation Signal 2096 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, Min. Acceptance Criteria Yes Spec. X4AJ06 Vent'n HEPA Filters For HEPA Filter is Removal of 99.97% of 0.3 Micron Thermally Generated, Monodispersed DOP Particles 2097 FSAR 6.4.2.2. Habitability Systems, Min. Air Residence Time Yes Calc. X462108v02 Vent'n Carbon Adsorbers in Carbon Is 0.5 Sec. At Nominal Face Velocity 40 ft./ mi '18
l
.
TABLE 1 (Continued)
C0pmITMENT VERIFICATION .,
i Comunitment Verified First Source Comunitment Section Consnitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents Verified Second Order Documents Ref N FSAR 6.4. Habitability Systems, Yes Spec. 74AJ01 Vent'n Leak Tightness
,
- 2114 FSAR 6.4. Control Room Protection RG 1.95 Yes From Chlorine 2117 FSAR 6.4. Control Room HVAC Designed to Pressurize Yes Calc. X4C2109V02 Room to 1/8" WG During
,
Below Allowable Concentrations 2123 FSAR 6.5.1. ESF Filter Systems Piping Penetration Filter Yes Design Piping Exhust System Designed Penetration Filter To Maintain a 0.25" WG Exhaust System Pressure Below Surrounding Areas 2125 FSAR 6.5.1. ESF Filter System DesipedToMaintainMi Yes Spec. X4AJ06 Design Basis FHB 0.25 WG Neg. Pressure Post-Accident In FHB Following a Fuel Exhaust System Hand 11pg Accident 2127 FSAR 6.5.1. ESF Filter System 10 CFR 50, Appendix A Yese Spec. I4AJ07 Design Basis FHB GDC 19 Post-Accident Exhaust System 2128 FSAR 6.5.1. ESF Filter System Designed to Maintain Yesf Design Basis, Electrical Penetration Electrical Penetration Area At 0.125" WG Filter Exhaust Pressure Below Adjacent System Areas 2130 FSAR 6.5.1. ESF Filter System RG 1.52 Yes Design Basis 2149 F SAR 6.5.1. ESF Filter System ANSI N509. Para. Yes Testing Of Motsture Separators
- 19
_ - - _ _ _ - - - - __ _ _ . _ _ _
_ . .
.
TABLE 1 (Continued)
COMMITENT VERIFICATION ,
.
Commitment Vertfled First R7f N Source Commitment Section Commitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents Verified Second Order Documents
'
4521 FSAR 7.3.5. Fuel Handling Building IEEE 279-1971 Yes Dwgs. AX406204-1. 2 Vent'n isolation Ven. Dwg. AX4AJ07-491-4 4500 FSAR 7.3.13. Aux. BIdg. ESF HVAC No Single Failure Within Yes Design Bases System Nor Any Supporting
,
i System Shall Prevent It i From Performing Its Safety Functions FSAR 9.2.9.1.1.1." Essential Chilled Water Designed To Maintain ESF Yes' Spec. K4AJ05 l 3441
' System Design Equipment /Switchgear Rooms Beinw The Maximum Design Ambient Air Tem of 104 F Under Accident Conditions 3461 FSAR 9.4.1. Central Alarm Station Designed To Limit H2 Y'S Backup HVAC System, Concentration To less System Operation Than 21 By Volume in Batte;y Room 3975 FSAR 9.4.3.3.3.3. Post Accident Or 3 Hr Rated Curtain Type Yes
,
' Emergency Oper. Of The Fire Dampers Located in FHB System Fire Dampers Fire Barriers, As Nece To Maintain Fire Rating 3977 FSAR 9.4.2.2. Post Accident Or Heating Coil Maintains Yes' Calc. X4C2109V02 Emergency Operation Of Relative Humidity Of Air Calc. X4C1500503 The FBH System - Entering The Charcoal, DR PK-2263 (System Operation) Below 70%
9.4.2.2. Post Accident Or ESF Fans Designed / Con Yes Spec. X4AJ07 3980 FSAR Emergency Operation Of To Seismic Cat. I Dwg. AI4DJ3107 i The FHB System - Safety DR. 1GLD2 j Evaluation Post Accident Or HEPA Filter Units Tested Yes Spec. X4AJ07 3983 FSAR 9.4.2. Ven. Dwg. AX4AJ07-492-4 Emergency Operation Of Individually Prior To FHB Ventilation System Installation To Verify
,
l Tests f. Inspections An Efficienty of 99.97%
4000 FSAR 9.4.3.2.1. Aux. Bldg. Emergency Designed To Maintain Yes i Ventilation System Negative Pressure To Safety Design Bases Prevent Radioactivity Release
,-_ ---__ _- ----_. - - .- -
- -_-_-_ - . _ . .
.
TABLE 1 (Continued) .
COMMITE NT VERIFICATION .
Commitment Vertfled First -
R;f N Source Comitment Section Comitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents Verified Second Order Documents 4007 F SAR 9.4.3. Aux. Bldg. Emergency ARI 410-1972 Yes Calc. X4C2108V02 Ventilation System Safety Design Bases 4008 FSAR 9.4.3. Aux. Bldg. Emergency MIL-F-51068 Yes'
Ventilation System HEPA F11ter Manufacturing & Testing 4015 FSAR 9.4.3. Aux. Bldg. Emergency SMACNA 1975 Yes Calc. X2CQ3.2. Pev. 4 Ventilation System Spec. X4AJ01 Ductwork Fabricatio DR PK-2466 Installation. Leak Testing and Balancing 4058 FSAR 9.4.5.1.1. Control Bldg. ESF Each Train Of Safety Yes Ventilation System - Features Electrical Electrical Equipment Room HVAC is Powered By Room A Separate System 4062 FSAR 9.4.5.1. Control Bldg. Safety HVAC Systems Designed Yes Dwg. AX4DB206-1 Feature Elec. Equipment To Maintain Space Temp DR. PK-2596 Room HVAc System Between 65 F and 100 F DR. PK-2435 4065 FSAR 9.4.5. Control Bldg. ESF HVAC RG 1.52 Yes Equipment Room vent'n System 4068 FSAR 9.4.5. Control Bldg. Safety Rooms Maintained At Yes Feature Elec. Equi Maximum 100 F Room HVAC System 4069 FSAR 9.4.5. Control Bldg. Safety Battery Rooms Have Elec Yes Feature Elec. Equi Reheat Colls To Maintain Room HVAC System A Room Design Temp. Of 70 F To 80 F 4073 FSAR 9.4.5.4. ESF Elect. Equip. Room Each Elec. Equip. Room Yes9 HVAC System Cooled By A Unit Whose Fan is Powered From Same ESF Bus as Equi In Room 3506 FSAR 9.4.5.4. Control Bldg. ESF Ven Each Train of Elec Yes Sys. - Elec. Penetration Penetration Filter Room Filter & Exhaust Exhaust System is System Connected to Separate Class E Supply
.
.-
TABLE 1 (Continued)
C0pettTMENT VERIFICATION *--
,
Comitment Verified First .
R;f N Source Comitment Section Commitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents Verified Second Order Documents 4077 FSAR 9.4.5. Control Bldg. ESF HVAC Min. Avg. Efficiency Of Yes Syst. - System Prefilter, Using Components Atmospheric Dust Is 20 to 60% When Tested By ASHRAE Standard 52 40B0 FSAR 9.4.5. Cimtrol Bldg. ESF HVAC Battery Room Exhaust Fans Yesh Syst. System Components Seismic CAT.1 4084 FSAR 9.4.5. Control Bldg. ESF HVAC Min. Acceptance Criteria Yesi DR PK-2392 Syst. System Components Is Removal Of 99.971 Of HEPA Filters 0.3 Micron Thermally Generated, Monodispersed Dioctyl Phthalate Particles 4090 FSAR 9.4.5. Control Bldg. ESF HVAC Acceptance Criteria Is Yese Syst. System Components Min. Efficiency of 991 Carbon Adsorbers Removal of Elementary Organic lodines At A Controlled R.H. Of 701 4088 FSAR 9.4. Control Bldg. ESF HVAC, MIL-F-51068 Yes'
HEPA Filters 4096 FSAR 9.4. Control Bldg. ESF HVAC, SMACNA 1975 Yes'
Ductwork 3607 FSAR 9.4.6.2. Containment Ventilation ASE Code Case N-294 Yes Syst. - Cont'st Coolers 3623 FSAR 9.4.7.1. Diesel Generator BId Designed to Limit Ma Yes Ventilation System - Temperature In Bldg. To Safety Design Bases 120 F With Diesel Generator In Operation 3624 FSAR 9.4.7.1. Diesel Generator Bld Single Active Component Yes ventilation System - Failure Coincident With Safety Design Bases Loss Of Offsite Power Does Not Impair Safety function 3625 FSAR 9.4.7.1. Diesel Generator Bld Vent. System Connected Yes DR WC-85063 Ventilation System - To Same Class IE Bus Safety Design Bases Train As Diesel Generator Set Being Ventilated
r,
..
TABLE 1 (Continued) *
C0pellTIENT VERIFICATION -
Commitment Verified First .
R7f II Source Commitment Section Connitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents verified Second Order Documents 4391 FSAR 9.4.7.1. Diesel Generator Bld Failure of Nonsafety, Yes Ventilation System - Monseismic HVAC Equip./
Safety Design Bases Ductwork Will Not Compromise Any Safety Related Systems, Structures Or Components 3632 FSAR 9.4.8.1. Auu. Feedwater Limit B1dg. Temperature Yes Pumphouse HVAC, Safety To 120 F Ma Design Bases 3641 F SAR 9.4.8. Aux. Feedwater ESF Intake Dampers Have Yes Pumphouse HVAC, Safety Class IE power Evaluation 3647 FSAR 9.4.9.2. Misc. HVAC Systems, Maintain Cable Tunnels At Yes Elec. Tunnel Ven Or Below 104 F System, Safety Evaluation 3650 F SAR 9.4.9. Misc. HVAC Systems, AMCA Std. 210, 1974 Yes Elec. Tunnel ven System. Fan Test 4854 FSAR 12.3.3. Ventilation Design 10 CFR 100 Yes Calc. X4C2108V02 Criteria 4878 FSAR 12.3.3.3. Design Of Air Cleaning RG 1.52 Yes Spec. X4AJ07 System 4973 FSAR C-85/04/29 Visual Welding AWS D Yes Acceptance 4149 NRC Quest. Q451. 5-1 HVAC Design ASHRAE Ves Corresp.
3710 NRC Quest. Q460. 03 Cooling Mechanism For ANSI M509-1980 Yes Spec. X4AJ05 Corres Each ESF Filter System 23 .
_ -- . - _ . _ _ . - - _ _ . . . - _ _
.
TABLE 1 (Continued)
COMITENT VERIFICATION
.
Comuni tment Verified First R:f N Source Comunitment Section comunitment Subject Document Feature Order Documents Verified Second Order Documents 3711 NRC Ques Q460. 08 Cooling Mecahnism For Relief Damper In The Au Yes .'.
Corres Each ESF F11ter System B1dg. External Walls Designed To Open At 3 psid
. The first five columns of this table are from Section 3.4, conenttment matrix.
b. 'Y':s" in the sixth column means that the commitment was verf fled in the documents Itsted in Section 3.5, implementation matrix. Notation in the seventh column means that the conunitment was verified in the document listed, Comunitment is within the scope of Module 8, not Module 184.
c. Mir.or clarification was required from RRP personnel. Consultment is addressed in Module 4, Ref. No. 2063. Implementation was not adequately referenced. Additional Ref. to DC-1620-3.1G is required.
h. Explosion proof fan motors not identified in commitment from FSAR 9.4.5.5.I. Specification X4AJ07-4.88, Rev.10, should reference ANSI NSO9, Para. 4.1 as well as Para. _, . . .
.
.
TABLE 2 LIST OF HARDWARE EXAMINED Hardware Remarks Examined by (Deficiencies Identified in Identification Hardware NRC RRP Violation 50-424/86-59-01)
F-789 Duct Section Yes Yes A-2546A Duct Section Yes Yes A-2552A Duct Section Yes Yes -Location not per drawing DGB-100 Duct Section Yes Yes F-846 Duct Section Yes -Loose bolt F-847 Duct Section Yes F-848 Duct Section Yes F-849 Duct Section Yes F-850 Duct Section Yes F-851 Duct Section Yes F-852 Duct Section Yes F-853 Duct Section Yes A-2548 Duct Section Yes A-2547 Duct Section Yes -Loose bolt A-2545 Duct Section Yes A-2544 Duct Section Yes F-779 Duct Section Yes F-787A Duct Section Yes A-2543 Duct Section Yes A-2542 Duct Section Yes -Nut with less than full thread engagement-Permanent identification tag not installed A-2551 Duct Section Yes i
A-2553A Duct Section Yes r
_ , , . - _ , _ _ .
-
-. ,, _ . . , _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ , , _ . . , _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , _g - , . _ _ y__. ,-._ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ , ___, .__,
.
.
TABLE 2 (CONTINUED)
Hardware Remarks Examined by (Deficiencies Identified in Identification Hardware NRC RRP Violation 50-424/86-59-01)
A-2554 Duct Section Yes DS-1088132-73 Duct Support Yes Yes -Cross brace mislocated DS-1088132-74 Duct Support Yes Yes DS-108B132-72 Duct Support Yes DS-108B132-39 Duct Support Yes DS-1093101-73 Duct Support Yes DS-1093101-74 Duct Support Yes Yes - "A" dimension not per drawing DS-1093101-91 Duct Support Yes Yes DS-1093101-88 Duct Support Yes DS-1091301-93 Duct Support Yes -" F" dimension not per drawing HV-12510 Damper Yes Yes -2 Loose bolts HV-12512 Damper Yes -Loose bolt-Washers not installed over six oversized / elongated holes on bolted connection TV12101 Damper Yes Yes HV12742 Damper Yes PDT2525A Instrument Yes Yes PDT2524A Instrument Yes -Not located per drawing ME12542A Instrument Yes Yes ME12541A Instrument Yes DS-108B132-72 Anchors Yes Yes DS-1112103-92 Anchors Yes Yes 1-1555-A7-001 Anchors Yes
.
.
TABLE 2 (Continued)
Hardware Remarks Examined by (Deficiencies-Identified in Identification Hardware NRC RRP Violation 50-424/86-59-01)
A-1542-N7-001 Equipment Yes Yes -3 Loose bolts on gage line support-Anchor bolt with less than full thread engagement-Charcoal fill port nut with less than full thread engagement-2 Bolts missing from fan support 1-1555-A7-009 Equipment Yes Yes 1-1555-A7-001 Equipment Yes -2 Loose nuts 1-1555-A7-003 Equipment Yes
_ __ . . _
- . . .
. . _ _ __
.
.
TABLE 3
-
LIST OF BECHTEL DESIGN CALCULATIONS REVIEWED Reviewed by Calculation N Re Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks X4C2109V02 -- FHB HVAC Equipment Yes Yes Sizing and Selection X2CQ Ducts Yes Yes X4C1500503 --
Building U Factors Yes Yes X4C2108V02 -- HVAC Equipment Sizing and Yes and Selection for System No.s 1551, 1553, 1555 and 1561
.
.
TABLE 4 LIST OF BECHTEL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS REVIEWED Reviewed by Specification N Re Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks X4AJ07 -- FHB HVAC Equipment System Yes Yes 1542 X4AJ01 -- HVAC Equipment Yes Yes Installation and Duct Fabrication and Installation X4AJ06 --
ESF HVAC Units Yes Yes (Factory Assembled)
(ASMESectionIII)
X4AJ05 -- ESF HVAC Chilled Water Yes Yes Circulating Pumps X4AJ34 -- Containment Building ESF Yes Yes HVAC Fans
c. -
.
.
TABLE 5 LIST OF BECHTEL DESIGN DRAWINGS REVIEWED Reviewed by Drawing No. Re Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks AX408204-1 --
FHB HVAC S) stems Yes Yes No. 1541 and 1542 AX4DB204-2 -- FHB HVAC Systems Yes Yes No. 1541 and 1542 AX4DB206-1 -- Control Building Control Yes Yes Room System 1531 AX4DJ3107 --
it'B HVAC Level 3 Sections Yes AX2D67W016 9 Dutt Supports Yes AX2008W216 3 Duct Supports Yes
,
m e
.
'
TABLE 6
-
LIST OF FIELD CHANGE REQUESTS REVIEWED Reviewed by FCR N Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks 1094F HVAC Support Details Yes 2589F HVAC Support Details Yes Yes Location, Control Building, Level 1 Room 117 12,332 HVAC Support For Circular Yes Yes Ducts-Details 11,383 HVAC Support Details Yes Yes 101F Typical Bridging For Duct Yes Yes Supports 12,165 HVAC Support Details Yes Yes 3456 Typical Field Furnished Yes Yes and Installed Bridging for Duct Supports 2249F HVAC Support Details Yes Yes 01F Standard 2038F Bridging for Duct Yes Supports 1129F Typical Field Furnished Yes Yes and Installed Bridging for Duct Supports 744F HVAC Support Details Yes Yes Rectangular and Circular Ducts
4135 Typical Field Furnished Yes Yes and Installed Bridging for Duct Supports 4156 HVAC Duct Support Details Yes Yes 3223 HVAC Typical Support Yes Yes Details
.
.
TABLE 6 (Continued)
, Reviewed by FCR N Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks
.10,877 HVAC Supports, Standard Yes Yes Bridging 1205F Duct Supports Yes 336F Duct-Support Yes 1410F Duct Supports Yes 1411F Duct Supports Yes 1412F Duct Supports Yes 1396F Duct Supports Yes 1231F Duct Supports Yes 1276F Duct Supports Yes
i i
I e
I
l
~
.
.
.
TABLE 7 LIST OF DEVIATION REPORTS (DR) REVIEWED Reviewed by DR N Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks 1GLO2 Vendor Supplied V-Belt Yes Too Short
'
PK-2392 Static Pressure Sensor- Yes Yes Pilot Tubes WC-85063 Diesel Generator Building Yes Yes OA Damper-Scattered 0xidation on Unit PK-2435 Unit 2-1531-N7-001, Top Yes Yes Flange Flanged and Dented PK-2262 AAF AH Unit, Temperature Yes Yes Control Instruments and Supports 10-0398 & CLA-VAL Valve Doesn't Yes Yes 10-0399 Conform to Design Yes Yes Drawing PK-2596 AAF Unit 2-1532-A7-002 Yes Yes Mounting Holes PK-2466 Unit 1-1555-A7-002 Short Yes Yes Mounting Leg SQ-216 Duct Piece with Corner Yes Yes Crack SQ-0045 Q Duct Support Hanger Yes Yes CD-4626 Unit A-1555-A7-001 Yes PK-01234 Unit A-1555-A7-001 Yes PK-01340 Unit A-1555-A7-001 Yes PK-01341 Unit A-1555-A7-001 Yes PK-01385 Unit A-1555-A7-001 Yes PK-02621 Unit A-1555-A7-001 Yes CD-4579 Unit A-1555-A7-001 Yes
.. _. _ _ - _ -
. . . .. _ - - - _ _ - - - . . - - . . . . _ . .. .
+
.
,
.
34 i TABLE 7 (Continued)
Reviewed by
.
DR N Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks i
PK-02064 Duct Support A-112103-92 Yes
- PK-02971 Duct Support A-112103-92 Yes PK-02965 Duct Support A-1093101-91 Yes
PK-02997 Duct Support Yes 1611103-1/W210 and .
1611103-1/W209 {
j PK-02979 Duct Support 1093101-73 Yes !
<
d
+
l
) [
.
l.
,
!
!
!
I I
l
.
b I
i
'
.
!
'
I
! :
i :
.
i
._-______ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
.
.
TABLE 8 LIST OF VENDOR DRAWINGS REVIEWED Reviewed by Drawing N Title / Description NRC RRP Remarks AX4AJ16-2-7 CVI Corp. General Yes Arrangement of Containment Cooling System AX4AJ07-491-4 AAF Instrumentation for Yes FHB ESF Air Cleaning AX4AJ07-492-4 AAF FHB ESF Air Cleaning Yes
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
ACRONYMS ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers BPC Bechtel Power Corporation CPV Construction Program Verification DEV Deviation DI Deficiency Item DPV Design Program Verification DR Deviation Report FCR Field Change Request FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report GPC Georgia Power Company HVAC Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning IDR Independent Design Review IE NRC Office of Insepction and Enforcement IFI Inspector Followup Item IMP 0 Institute of Nuclear Power Operation NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations P/K-F Pollman/Kenith-Fortson PRM Project Reference Manual QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control RG NRC Regulatory Guide RRP Readiness Review Program RRPT Readiness Review Program Team SER Safety Evaluation Report SRP Standard Review Plan
!
r- -
.
e
S&W Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation UNR Unresolved Item VEGP Vogtle Electric Generating Plant VIOL Violation
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _-