IR 05000424/1986002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-424/86-02 on 860106-10.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations Organization & Administration & Module 5, Readiness Review
ML20137S926
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1986
From: Belisle G, Latta R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137S893 List:
References
50-424-86-02, 50-424-86-2, NUDOCS 8602180145
Download: ML20137S926 (9)


Text

.- , m ,

' -

v . >

< r p - UNITE 3 STATES fj f tYoq'o,

..

. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[

.

[ o . REGION 11 g 3 j 101 MARIETTA STREET. *- 2 ATL ANTA. G EORGI A 30323

.,

%...../ .

Report No.: 50-424/86-02 Licensee: . Georgia Power Company P. 0. Box 4545 . Atlanta, GA~- 30302

'

Docket No.: 50-424 License No.: CPPR-108 Facility Name: -Vogtle Unit 1 Inspection Conducted: Januar 6-10, 1986 Inspector: / 2 f / / ,_ r ~

J-S-64 R. M. Latta Date Signed Approved by: 97e. G. A. BelisTer#ctiTig Section Chief s/M6 Dite/ Signed-Division of Reactor Safety

SUMMARY Scope: This routine,, announced-inspection involved 38 inspector-hours on site in-

. the areas. of ' Operations Organization and Administration, ' Module 5, Readiness

_

.

Review.-

Results: No violations or deviations were identifie .

f

%

i

>

L .

,

PDR

,

.

- .

.

.

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Lic'ensee Employees-

  • C. Belflower, Quality Assurance (QA) Site Manager (Operations)
  • J. Draggs, Readiness Review QA
  • Grabbard, Regulatory Specialist
  • R. Odom,_ Plant Engineering Supervisor

-*W. Ramsey, Readiness Review Program Manager

  • S. Spencer, Commitment. Tracking Coordinator
  • G. Trudeau, Readiness' Review Administrative Manager
  • H. Varnadoe, Module 5 Team Leader
  • H. Walker, Operations Discipl.ine Manager

'

Other licensee employees contacted included engineers, technicians, and office personne NRC Resident Inspector

  • J. Rogge, Senior Resident Inspector
  • Attended exit interview ,

1 Exit Interview

~

The inspection scope and ' findings were summarized on January 10, 1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph I above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection result No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials'provided to or reviewed by the'_

inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspectio . Operations Organization and Administration, Module 5, Readiness Review This. inspection was performed to determine the adequacy of changes that were submitted to Module 5, Revision 1, dated November 1, 198 Section 3.5-Implementation Matrix In order to determine -whether the Vogtle Nuclear Operations organiza-tion and administration activities had been implemented in compliance with the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), the inspector selected the following sample of reverified commitments from the Module 5 implementation matrix:

.-_____________--1_;

-

-

.

.

.

Source Documpnt- Section Implementing Document ANSI N45.2.4-1972 C, Revision 1 ANSI N18.7-1976 VEGP QA Manual, Revision 7 10003-C, Revision 0 ANSI N18.7-1976 VEGP QA Manual, Revision 7'

00002-C, Revision 2 QA-05-01, Revision 12 ANSI ~N18.7-1976 VEGP QA Manual,. Revision 7 00050-C, Revision 2 ANSI _N45.2.1-1973 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.1-1973 C, Revision 0 00350-C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.1-1973 C,-Revision 0 00350-C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.1-1973 C,-Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.1-1973 C, Revision 0 00204-C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 C, Revision 0 00850-C, Revision 2 00203-C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 C, Revision 0 00203-C, Revision 2 85000-C, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 C, Revision 0 85307-C, Revision 2 SUM-18, Revision 4 00850-C, Revis m 2 00853-C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 C, Revision 0 00850-C, Revision 2 00853-C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 C, Revision 0 25040-C, Revision 0 25045-C, Revision 0 SUM-18, Revision 4 ANSI N45.2.2-1972 C, Revision 0 00850-C, Revision 2 00100-C, Revision 1 ANSI-N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 1 00108-C, Revision 0 00101-C, Revision 1 00103-C, Revision 0 L.__________________---.-_-----

~

.

,

.

.

Source Document Section Implementing Document-ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 1 00101-C, Revision 1 00103-C, Revision 0 00108-C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 1 00108-C, Revision 0 00101-C, Revision 1 00103-C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 C, Revision 0 00800-C, Revision 3 00203-C, Revision 2 00850-C, Revision 2 00853-C, Revision 2 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976_ C, Revision 2 00800-C, Revision 3

' ANSI N45.2.13-1976 1 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 00850-C, Revision 2 00203-C, Revision 2 00800-C, Revision 3 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 12.0- huclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1-QA-05-01, Revision 12 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 85304-C, Revision 0 00202-C, Revision 0 00800-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.2~ 00051-C, Revision l'

00103-C, Revision 1 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 00201-C, Revision 1 00405-C, Revision 0 00050-C, Revision 2 Quality Assurance Manual, Revision ?

FSAR 17.2.2 Project Policy and. Procurement Manual, Part C Project Reference Manual, Part B FSAR 17.2.2 00700-C, Revisio QA-01-01, Revision 10 FSAR 17.2.2 00800-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.4 00203-C, Revision 2 00800-C, Revision 3 85302-C, Revision 1 85004-C, Revision 0

.

.

.

Source Document Section Implementing Document FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 00800-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.4. 00203-C, Revision 2 00800-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17. C, Rev.ision 2 00800-C, Revision 3-

'

FSAR 17. C,' Revision 1 00052-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 00204-C, Revision 0 00208-C,. Revision ~0 85100-C, Revision 2 85200-C,. Revision 0 10011-C, Revision 3 00052-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 00051-C, Revision 1 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 00108-C, Revision 0 00203-C, Revision 2 00800-C, Revision 3 00850-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 00103-C, Revision 0 00050-C, Revision 2 00051-C, Revision 1 00052-C, Revision-0 00101-C, Revision 1 00108 C,- Revision 1 FSAR 17.2.6- 00100-C, Revision 1 00402-C, Revision-0 00103-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 00108-C, Revision 0 00052-C, Revision 0 00051-C, Revision 1 L 00050-C, Revision 2-00103-C, Revision 0-00101-C, Revision 1

=FSAR 17.2.6 00050-C, Revision 2 00051-C, Revisicn.1-00101-C, Revision 1 00108-C, Revision 0 00052-C, Revision 0 00053-C, Revision 0 00100-C, Revision 1 00103-C. Revision 0

,

,

. /

,

.

'

. Source Document Section Implementing Document FSAR 17. C, Revision 1-00052-C, Revision 0 00100-C, Revision-1 00101-C, Revision 1 00103-C, Revision 0 00108-C, Revision 0 00050-C, Revision 2

.

FSAR 17.2.7.1 Nuclear Procurement Policy

'

Manual, Revision l'

00203-C, Revision 2 *

00800-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.7.1 00203-C, Revision 2-00800-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.7.3 00850-C, Revision 2 00203-C, Revision 2-00800-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.7.3 50021-C, Revision 0 00850-C, Revision 2-50020-C, Revision 0-

-

55002-C, Revision 0 00100-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.7.3 00850-C, Revision 2 85307-C, Revision 2 00853-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 00851-C, Revision 0 85307-C, Revision 2 00853-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.8- 00850-C,' Revision 2 85307-C,. Revision 2 00853-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 00801-C, Revision 0 '

00053-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.10 00201-C, Revision 1 85100-C, Revision 2 85301-C, Revision 0 85000-C, Revision 1 FSAR 17.2.10 00208-C, Revision 0 20405-C, Revision 2 85303-C, Revision 0 20203-C, Revision 2

mw

~

-

.

, .

.

6 l

.

.-..

Source Document Section Implementing Document FSAR 17.2.10 00201-C, Revision 1

~85100-C, Revision 2 85301-C, Revision 0 00350-C, Revision 0

- FSAR 17.2.11 00050-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.12 00208-C, Revisio C, Revision 2 85303-C, Revision 0 20230-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.12 -00208-C, Revision 0 20405-C, Revision 2'

85303-C, Revision 0

~20230-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.12 00208-C, Revision 0 20230-C, Revision 2 20405-C, Revision 2 85303-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.12 00002-C, Revision 2 00051-C, Revision 1 00208-C, Revision 0 FSA ^17.2.12 85303-C, Revision 0 85100-C, Revision 2 00202-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.12 00208-C, Revision 0 20230-C, Revision 2 20405-C, Revision 2 85303-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.13 - 00851-C, Revision 0 00850-C, Revision 2 00202-C, Revision'0 00254-C, Revision 0

- FSAR 17.2.13 00851-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.14~ 00200-C, Revision 0 85307-C, Revision 2 L _

00850-C, Revision 2

<

FSAR 17.2.14 85100-C, Revision 2 85301-C, Revision 0 00304-C, Revisfo'n 3 OG404-C, Revision 0 L 00853-C, Revision 2 85304-C, Revision 0 85201-C, Revision 1 00350-C, Revision 0

,

t

I

-

.

.

.

Source Documer t Section Implementing Document 00204-C, Revision 0

~

FSAR' 17.2.14 00850-C, Revision 2 00853-C, Revision 2-00304-C, Revision 3 00350-C, Revision 0 85301-C,' Revisio FSAR 17.2.15 85307-C, Revision 2 00850-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.16 SUM-18, Revision 4 FSAR 17.2.16 00100-C, Revision 1 00103-C, Revision 0 00108-C, Revision 0 00101-C, Revision 1 A detailed examination of the above listed documents identified several examples of vague or general procedural references in the implementa-tion . matrix. However, the inspector determined through review of _

additional project- documentation that adequate procedural controls existed and that these examples. appear to be isolated cases and do not represent a programmatic deficienc The Commitment Tracking Program is an integral part of the implementa-

~

tion matrix.and is used to ascertain whether a commitment is included in the implementing document and to track the status of unissued and draft project documents which implement operational commitments. Th inspector selected the following commitment -tracking items from Module 5, Table 3.0-2, to determine if.the stated commitments, require-ments,.and regulations directly specified in commitment source documents were identified:

Source Document Section Commitment Tracking FSAR 17. FSAR 17. FSAR 17. FSAR 17. , 5384 FSAR 17.2.5_ 5320 FSAR 17.2.11 4003 FSAR 17.2.11- 4005 FSAR 17.2.14 2456 FSAR 17.2.15 2461 FSAR 17.2.15 2462 FSAR 17.2.15 2458 FSAR 17.2.15 2459 FSAR 17.2.16 2466 FSAR 17.2.16 2472 a..____

-

.

.

.

The inspector determined through an examination of the above listed project documents and commitment tracking items that the implementing procedures appear to satisfy existing regulatory requirements and commitment Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie b. Section 4.1, Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B Table 4.1-1, which lists procedures addressed in FSAR Section 1 requirements, was submitted for review following reformatting and scope clarification. The inspector examined 33 plant procedures from the subject table and determined that these procedures appear to meet the 10 CFR 50 Appendix B criteri Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie c. Section 5.0, Audits Within the area of project audits, the onsite Quality Assurance Group had performed one audit of the Operations Organization and Administra-tion area since the previous inspection. This audit, SP01-85/15, Q Audit of Readiness Review Activities addressed the following modules or appendices:

Module 2 - Operations Tra'ining and Qualification Module 3A - Initial Test Program Module 5 - Operations Organization and Administration Appendix D - Document Control The. purpose of this audit was to determine the overall effectiveness of the Readiness Review organization in identifying cor..iitments in the Nuclear Operations area, and verifying that these commitments were included in implementing procedure Relat ve to Module 5, 'the following is.a summary of problems found:

-

Implementing procedures for all commitments were not identifie Some commitments were not addressed in implementing procedure Some commitments were only partially implemented by the procedures identified in the Readiness Review module. This was due to both errors in the commitment matrix and errors in the procedure The inspector determined that the problems identified during this audit appeared to have been corrected by the Readiness Review staff and Nuclear Operation Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.