IR 05000424/1986028
| ML20205P533 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 04/29/1986 |
| From: | Jape F, Larry Nicholson NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205P520 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-86-28, NUDOCS 8605210446 | |
| Download: ML20205P533 (3) | |
Text
[3 Kic UNITED STATES
/
'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
&\\
/,^
REGION 11
)"I O
101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.
{.
E ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 i
...../
s, v
'
Report No.:
50-424/86-28 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Docket No.: 50-424 License No. : CPPR-108 Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Inspection Conducted: April 14-18,1986 Inspector:
a E. Nicholson "
(/ V Date Signed
'
Approved y:
//
hw F. Jape, Section Chief (/
f
~
~
Date Signed Engineering Branch Division of Reactor 13afety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection involved reviewing preoperational test procedures and results review.
Results: No violations or deviations were identified.
l
,
8605210446 860505 PDR ADOCK 05000424
'
G PDR
'
.,
y
-_
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- C E. Belflower, Quality Assurance Site Manager - Operations
- J. F. D'Amico, Regulatory Compliance Superintendent R. P. Farrow, Instrumentation & Control Procedure Supervisor W. T. Forehand, Test Supervisor
- D. O. Foster, Vice-President, Project Support
- W. C. Gabbard, Regulatory Specialist l
- E. D. Groover, Qualit; Assurance Site Manager - Construction
- D. F. Hallman, Nuclear Operations
- C. W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality Assurance ":r.ager J. D. Klohn, Instrumentation & Control Technician
- G. A. McCarley, Project Compliance Coordinator
- H. P. Walker, Manager Unit Operations Other liceW3ee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, sccurity office members and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
- H. H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector, Construction
- J. F. Rogge, Senior Residtnc Inspectors, Operations
- Attended exit interview
,
2.
Exit Interview
,
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 18, 1986, with i
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No dis-senting comments were received from the licensee.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the
'
inspector during this inspection.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspection.
)
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspectio r
,
.
,
5.
Residual Heat Removal Preoperational Test Procedure Review (70336)
The inspector reviewed the residual heat removal system preoperational test procedure 1-3BC-01 to verify technical adequacy.
A review of licensee commitments from applicable FSAR chapters, Regulatory Guide 1.68 and the Safety Evaluation Report was performed and compared with requirements contained in the test procedure.
This included verifying that pertinent prerequisites were identified, initial test conditions and system status were specified, acceptance criteria were specified, and performed with management approval indicated.
Changes to the procedure (through change
- 35) were examined to verify proper review and administrative control had been utilized.
No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
6.
Accumulator Preoperational Test Results Evaluation (70322)
The inspector reviewed preliminary results of accumulator preoperational testing per procedure 1-3BJ-03.
Strip charts and their accompanying calculations were checked to verify accuracy as well as conformance with the acceptance criteria.
The test supervisor's log was examined to ensure that adequate conduct and documentation transpired during the performance of the test.
Discrepancies noted while testing were verified to be dispositioned per the correct administrative controls.
The inspector researched the documentation resulting in the preoperational testing of the accumulator level indication system calibrated to vendor generic values in lieu of actual as-built configurations.
This situation was detected when the test supervisor reviewed a maintenance work order to recalibrate the accumulator level indication using the as-built levels.
Confusion was aggravated by original maintenance procedures issued with generic values.
No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
- - - - - - - - _ _ ----- -------
---
-
- _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - _ - - - _
_ _ _ - _ - - -
-_--_-a