IR 05000424/1986028

Insp Rept 50-424/86-28 on 860414-18.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Preoperational Test Procedures & Results

ML20205P533
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	04/29/1986
From:	Jape F, Larry Nicholson NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205P520	List: IR 05000424/1986028 ML20205P515
References
50-424-86-28, NUDOCS 8605210446
Download: ML20205P533 (3)

Text

• [3 Kic UNITED STATES

/

&\

'o

/ ,^

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 11

)"I O 101 MARIETTA STREET, {. i E ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

...../

s, v

'

Report No.: 50-424/86-28 Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Docket No.: 50-424 License No. : CPPR-108 Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Inspection Conducted: April 14-18,1986 Inspector: a E. Nicholson " '

(/ V Date Signed Approved y: // hw ~

~

Date Signed F. Jape, Section Chief Engineering Branch (/ f Division of Reactor 13afety SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection involved reviewing preoperational test procedures and results review.

Results: No violations or deviations were identifie l

,

8605210446 860505 l

'

PDR ADOCK 05000424 G PDR l

'

.,

y

-_

.

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• C E. Belflower, Quality Assurance Site Manager - Operations

• J. F. D'Amico, Regulatory Compliance Superintendent R. P. Farrow, Instrumentation & Control Procedure Supervisor W. T. Forehand, Test Supervisor

• D. O. Foster, Vice-President, Project Support

• C. Gabbard, Regulatory Specialist l *E. D. Groover, Qualit; Assurance Site Manager - Construction

• D. F. Hallman, Nuclear Operations

• C. W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality Assurance ":r.ager J. D. Klohn, Instrumentation & Control Technician

• G. A. McCarley, Project Compliance Coordinator

• H. P. Walker, Manager Unit Operations Other liceW3ee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, sccurity office members and office personne NRC Resident Inspectors

• H. H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector, Construction

• J. F. Rogge, Senior Residtnc Inspectors, Operations

, * Attended exit interview

, Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 18, 1986, with i those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the l areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings. No dis- l senting comments were received from the licensee. The licensee did not l identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the '

inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspectio ) Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspectio :

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

r ,

, .

2 Residual Heat Removal Preoperational Test Procedure Review (70336)

The inspector reviewed the residual heat removal system preoperational test procedure 1-3BC-01 to verify technical adequacy. A review of licensee commitments from applicable FSAR chapters, Regulatory Guide 1.68 and the Safety Evaluation Report was performed and compared with requirements contained in the test procedure. This included verifying that pertinent prerequisites were identified, initial test conditions and system status were specified, acceptance criteria were specified, and performed with management approval indicate Changes to the procedure (through change

1. 35) were examined to verify proper review and administrative control had been utilize No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspecte . Accumulator Preoperational Test Results Evaluation (70322)

The inspector reviewed preliminary results of accumulator preoperational testing per procedure 1-3BJ-0 Strip charts and their accompanying calculations were checked to verify accuracy as well as conformance with the acceptance criteria. The test supervisor's log was examined to ensure that adequate conduct and documentation transpired during the performance of the tes Discrepancies noted while testing were verified to be dispositioned per the correct administrative control The inspector researched the documentation resulting in the preoperational testing of the accumulator level indication system calibrated to vendor generic values in lieu of actual as-built configurations. This situation was detected when the test supervisor reviewed a maintenance work order to recalibrate the accumulator level indication using the as-built level Confusion was aggravated by original maintenance procedures issued with generic value No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspecte l l

l l

!

l

- - - - - - - - _ _ ----- ------- --- - - _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ - _ - - - -_--_-a