IR 05000424/1986023

Insp Rept 50-424/86-23 on 860314-17.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Rcs Cold Hydrostatic Test

ML20205M083
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	04/02/1986
From:	Jape F, Schnebli G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205M072	List: IR 05000424/1986023 ML20205M067
References
50-424-86-23, NUDOCS 8604150067
Download: ML20205M083 (3)

Text

9 UNITED STATES

[p Mc

.

'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

_[ n j

REGloN 11 101 MARIETTA STREET. * 2 ATL ANTA. GEORGI A 30323

\...../ .

Report No.: 50-424/86-23 Licensee: Georgia Power Company

'

P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 Docket No.: 50-424 License No.: CPPR-108 Facility Name: Vogtle 1 Inspection Conducted: March 14-17, 1986 Inspector: "

W ~

A. Schnebli y // Date Signed Accompanying Personnel: F. Jape Approved by:

F. Jape, Section Chief" Cu2 yf Mh Datd Signed

,

!

< Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety

'

SUMMARY Scope: This special, unannounced inspection entailed 32 inspector-hours on site in the area of witnessing the Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydrostatic Test.

,

Results: No violations or deviations were identifie l

1 K

G

_ __ . ._ . _ . _ . _ __. .

__ . __ ..

[

l *

o . - l l l l .,

REPORT DETAILS

!

l l Persons Contacted Licensee Employees  ;

J. Aufdenkampe, Lead Integrated Test Supervisor

• C. Belflower, QA Site Manager - Operations

• R. Bellamy, Manager Test and Outage G. Bockhold, Plant General Manager

• H. Handfinger, Preoperational Test Superintendent

• A. Mosbaugh, Superintendent Engineering Liaison L. Smith, Preoperational Test Director

• G. Spell, QA Engineering Supervisor J. Trawber, Preoperational Test Director Other licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, operators. mechanics and authorized nuclear inspectors (ANIS).

I NRC Resident Insp3ctors

• J. Rogge, Sepior Resident Inspector - Operations

• H. Livermore, Senior Resident Inspector - Construction

• R. Schepens, Resident Inspector

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 17, 1986, with l those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the '

areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection finding No

'

dissenting comments were received from the license The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspectio . Unresolved Items Unresolved Item were not identified during the inspectio I l

i

_ _ - - - _ _ _ _'

_ . . .

<

!

!

. 1

.

l

. l l 5. On March 14-17, 1986, the inspector witnessed the final preparations for and 1

'

the successful completion of the Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydrostatic j Test. Licensee activities were observed to verify the folloving:

Testing was conducted in accordance with approved procedures and the j latest revision of the test procedure, VEGP-1, 1-300-03, Revision 1,

was available and in use by personnel conducting the tes l

'

i

Test procedure prerequisites were me l

Valve lineup and system check sheets were completed, as require Water quality and system temperatures were monitored and met vendor

, requirement Pressure gauges of the required range and special test equipment as specified by the test procedure were properly calibrated and installed, as require Relief valves were installed where required and relief paths verified for system overpressure protectio ; Data required were colle:ted by the proper personne ;

Adequate coordination existed among the responsible organizations to l conduct the test properl A pretest oriefing was conducted and potential problem areas were

discussed.

! All leakage was properly documente :

I Leakage was directed away from other components under test to avoid masking leaks from other joint Proper plant systems were inservic Hydrostatic test pressure was reached on March 16, 1986, at approximately

'

12:03 p.m. System temperature and pressure were verified to be within the

!

required limits for the specified hold time. The inspector observed QC and ANI inspections of various primary systems and components. The inspector considered that performance of the test was exceptional. The direction and coordination showed evidence of prior planning and experience. Problems that developed throughout the test were handled expeditiously and properl No violations or deviations were identified in the areas inspecte ;

I