IR 05000424/1986021

Insp Repts 50-424/86-21 & 50-425/86-12 on 860318-21.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previous Enforcement Matters & Employee Concerns

ML20203N436
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	04/17/1986
From:	Conlon T, Hunt M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20203N426	List: IR 05000424/1986021 ML20203N423
References
50-424-86-21, 50-425-86-12, NUDOCS 8605050412
Download: ML20203N436 (5)

Text

- . , ..

r r

pMteg UNITED STATES '

,

y 'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[.

'

.n REGION ll 3 j' 101 MARIETTA STREET. * * ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30323

-

\,me*/ ,

!

!

Report Nos.: 50-424/86-21 and 50-425/86-12

Licensee: Georgia Power Company i P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 i

!

'

Docket Nos.: 50-424 and 50-425 License Nos.: CPPR-108 and.CPPR-109 Facility Name: Vogtle I and 2

.

Inspection Conducted: March 18-21, 1986 1nspectar Y M. D. Hunt hsGX fn , ~

'

//-/7*$b'

Date Signed <

} Approved by _ /M/ t_.- //-/7 od

T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed Engineering Branch

'

Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection involved 20 inspector-hours on site in the areas of previous enforcement matters and employee concerns.

Results: No violations or deviacions were identified.

,

I r

,

8605050412 860421 ADDCK 05000424

,

PDR PDR

- . - - . , . _ - . - - - - . . - . _ . , , . . .- -

.-

--. . . .-- - . - . . . --

. . _ .

-

, - .

REPORT DETAILS

, Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• R. E. Conway, Senior Vice President, Vogtle Project

• R. H. Penson, Vice President, Vogtle~ Project

• H. Googe, Project Construction Manager

• C. Hayes, Vogtle Quality Assurance (QA) Manager

• E. D. Groover, QA Site Manager, Construction

• F. Page, Electrical Quality Control (QC) Section Superintendent A. Smith, Maintenance Superintendent Nuclear Operatione R. Wolf, Maintenance Supervisor Nuclear Operations l

Ot:,er licensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and office personne NRC Resident Inspector I

,

• H. H. Livermore I

i * Attended exit interview i Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 21, 1986, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection finding No dissenting comments were received from the licensee. The licensac did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or reviewed by the -

i inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (Closed) Violation 50-424, 425/85-16-01, Inadequate Procedure For The Installation and Inspection of Cable Supports in Electrical Penetration <

<

The licensee's response dated June 27, 1985 and January 15, 1986, committed to issue a turn over procedure which would insure that the cable support moment loading limitations were calculated / verified to be within . limits ,

established by the manufacturer. This procedure is GD-A-50, Revision 1, '

, Nuclear Construction Facility Turnover, issued February 6,1986, which in

. Section 10.9 requires the electrical discipline facility engineer to I i

calculate and verify the applied moments on electrical penetrations. There have been no areas turned over yet which contain electrical penetration This item is close '

l 1 l l

. - -_ __ ___ - __-_ - _______ -_-___ ,

i

'

'

!

.

(Closed) Violation 50-424,425/85-16-02, No Directions For Acceptance /

Rejection of Deviation Reports. The licensee has taken steps outlined in their response dated June 27, 1985. Deviation reports (DR) are given numbers on origination, reviewed by the initiator's supervisor for concurrence. Provisions are now in place to provide further evaluation for concurrence if the initiator is not satisfied with his supervisor's evaluation. These provisions are described and required by Procedure GD-T-01, Nonconformance Control, Revision 13. This item is close (Closed) Violation 50-424, 425/85-16-03, Failure to Disposition Deviation Reports in Accordance with Procedure The licensee has completed the commitments made in their June 27, 1985 respons Procedures GD-T-01, Nonconformance Control and GD-T-28, Equipment / Component Removal have been completely revised to provide move exact handling of DR tagged materials upon removal from permanent locations / installations. Instructions for proper dispositioning of DRs are now included in the listed procedure This item is close (Closed) Violation 50-424, 425/85-16-04, Failure to Post Form NRC-3 and Part 21 Information in Three Operations Area As reported in the licensee's June 27, 1985 response, the documents listed in the violation are now posted as required. This item is close (Closed) Violation 50-424, 425/85-16-05, Failure to Assemble Battery Racks in Accordance with Approved Instructions. The inspector examined the racks for batteries 1ADIB, ICD 18, and 1BDIB which had been corrected to meet the manufacturer's requirements for the batteries to be snug against the end bracket and found them satisfactory. This corrective action was outlined in the licensee's report to RII dated June 27, 1985. This item is closed Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during the inspectio . Employee Concern:

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission had been contacted at various times by individuals who have expressed concerns relating to the construction quality control program at this site. As the result of these concerns, the NRC inspectors interviewed various personnel, examined various QC documents,

_

reviewed engineering specification and design details to determine the seriousness of the concern as it relates to safe plant operation. The following concern was examined during this inspection:

Concern: A Discrepancy Report (DR) describing a non conforming condition in the top horizontal wire way of Motor Control Center (MCC)

1 ABC not properly evaluate . . - .. ..

l l

l

.

.

,

I Discussion: During the period of March through May 1985, three inspections were performed (see IE Report Nos. 50-424, 425/85-10; 50-424, 425/85-16 and 50-424, 425/85-20) to examine various employee concerns relating to the electrical QC progra This concern was received in that time frame and is similar to others relating to the disposition of DRs. These DRs were examined during the previous listed inspections and violation 50-424, 425/85-16-03. Failure to Disposition Daviations Reports in Accordance With Procedures, was issue The status of this violation is discussed in paragraph 3 of this repor It should be noted that the reason for the DR being written was the manner in which the electrical cables had been installed in the horizontal wire way above MCC 1 ABC. Similar conditions had been identified on MCCs 1ABD, IABB, IBBD, and .1BBB dur(ng the previous inspection The cables were not installed in a neat workmanship manner that provided easy access for inspection of the cable training placement in these MCC While no violations of procedures were found, it was noted that the lack of proper cable training in the MCC wireways made it difficult for the QC inspectors to examine the various cables after they were terminate During the previously noted inspections, discussions were held with the licensee's managers of engineering, quality assurance and quality control to address the conditions that existed in these MCC wireways. As a result the cables were determinated and pulled out of the MCCs so that additional conduits and cable trays could be added above and to the sides of the MCC horizontal raceways to permit a less congested routing of cables into the MCCs. The cable were then reinstalled and reterminate During this inspection, the MCC raceways were examined by the inspector and found to be accessible for cable inspection and identificatio Findings: This concern is substantiated. The DR which was identified by the employee as one similar to a group that had been identified earlier l which resulted in the violation 50-424, 425/85-16-03 being cite Discussions with the concerned employee during this inspection were held to

'

determine if and what further actions were required to alleviate the concern. The inspector was advised that the licensee had taken corrective actions "over and above" that which the person considered adequate to correct the situatio Within the area examined, no violations or deviations were identifie . Inspector Followup Item (IFI)

(Closed) IFI 50-424/83-13-08 and 425/83-13-05, GPC Audit E001-83/26, Item Concerning Design Drawings for Cable Tray Supports. This item was .

identified in QA Audit #ED01-83/26 of drawings used for installation and l inspection of conduit cable tray supports. The finding concerned the number l of various drawings and Field Change Requests (FCR) that were required for installation and inspection raceway support The consolidation of I

_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

r 1

-

. .

information onto fewer drawings was recommended by the auditor as a possible corrective action for this ite The finding was closed by the QA auditor based on the actions taken by the contractor / installer which consolidated common or related features for raceway supports into an information booklet for use by the craftsmen. This item is close _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _