IR 05000400/1979012

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-400/79-12,50-401/79-12,50-402/79-11 & 50-403/79-11 on 790612-14.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Steel Structures & Supports,Welding Procedure Specs & QA Procedures
ML18003A633
Person / Time
Site: Harris  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/09/1979
From: Economos N, Herdt A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML18003A630 List:
References
50-400-79-12, 50-401-79-12, 50-402-79-11, 50-403-79-11, NUDOCS 7908200221
Download: ML18003A633 (9)


Text

~>58 REGS,

~4

+y*yW UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-400/79-12, 50-401/79-12, 50-402/79-11 and 50-403/79-)1 Licensee:

Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Facility Name:

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos.

50-400, 50-401, 50-402 and 50-403 License Nos.

CPPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-)60 and CPPR-161 Inspection at S earon Harris Site near Raleigh, North Carolina Inspector:P N. Ec s

Approved by:

A. R. Herdt, Section Chief, RCES Branch ate Signed at Signed Inspection on June 12-14, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 20 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of steel structures and supports, welding procedure specifications and QA procedures; followup on Region II requests; weld material control.

Results No apparent items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.

'F99889 caaI

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees R.

M. Parsons, Site Manager N. J. Chiangi, Engineering and Construction gA G. L. Forehand, Principal QA Specialist M. Reese, Project Engineer (Welding)

D. M. Sullivan, Materials Engineer J. Burnette, Warehouse Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included four construction craftsmen, and two technicians.

Other Organizations Chicago Bridge and Iron Company R. Iearch, Project Superintendent F. P. Hazely, gA Superintendent R. B. West, gA Technician 2.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 15, 1979, by inspector R. D. Bradley.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

~

Licensee Action on Potential Construction Deficiency Reports (CDR)

(Open) Potential CDR (400/79-12-02):

Containment Penetration Collars not Heat Treated.

On June 5, 1979 the licensee reported that 15 of 18 pipe penetrations fabricated by Tube Turns Division of Chemtron Corp.,

(vendor)

had not received the required post weld heat treatment (PWH) before shipment to the site.

On July 5, 1979, the licensee reported, via telephone, this item to be a reportable deficiency under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55(e)

and stated that a written report would be forthcoming as required.

Four of these penetrations had been installed when this matter was reported to RI At the time of this inspection the four installed penetrations had been cut-out and the entire lot of 15 had been returned to the vendor for PWH.

The inspector discussed this matter with the licensee, inspected the area on the containment where the penetrations had been installed and reviewed related QA/QC records including the vendor's report to RII on the subject, dated June 7,

1979.

This item remains open pending RII's receipt and review of the aforementioned report.

(Closed)

Potential CDR (400, 401/79-12-01 and 402, 403/79-11-01):

Indica-tions in Service Water Pipe.

On May 21, 1979 the licensee reported finding linear indications on the OD surface of an eight (8) inch diameter service water pipe which had been installed.

Nondestructive and metallurgical examinations by the licensee, disclosed the indications were code allowable seam type defects.

The inspector examined the metallographic samples, reviewed related QA/QC records and discussed the matter with the cognizant licensee representative.

The licensee has determined this not to be report-able under

CFR 50.55(e).

The licensee's investigation and disposition appear to be satisfactory.

Independent Inspection Effort a ~

Spent Fuel Pool Pipe Erection Quality records of two erected spools S/N 3SF12-5SA and 3SF12-6SB, in the spent fuel pool system, drawing number 2165-6-254, line number 3SF12-5SA-1 and -4 were reviewed for completeness and accuracy.

In addition the inspector reviewed records of connecting welds FW-57 and FW-59 on ISO 1-SF-10.

These records included weld data reports (WDR),

nondestructive examination reports of the completed welds, deficiency and disposition report (DDR) No. 204 dealing with indications found in the weld prep of FW-57 and nonfusion in shop fabricated weld FW-58.

The corrective action and disposition was reviewed and found to be acceptable.

b.

Fuel Transfer Canal Bulkhead The two gate slots in the transfer canal bulkhead had been positioned in preparation for concrete pour.

The inspector reviewed engineering drawing CAR-2167-G-1877 Rev.

3 and related field change request FCR-C-679.

Both slots were fabricated by Industrial Engineering Works under purchase order 435148-9.

Quality certifications for material and shop fabrication, QC inspections and receipt reports were reviewed.

Co Inspection of Construction Activities A general inspection was conducted inside the auxiliary, fuel pool handling and containment buildings to observe welding activities, material handling and control, housekeeping and storage.

Within these areas the following items of interest were inspected:

(1) field weld FW-l, line No.

2 SI14-252SA-l, ISO 1-SI-1 was being welded out and the

.

&3 inspector checked it for weld appearance; welders, weld procedure and weld consumables which were noted and the certification records were later reviewed for conformance with code and procedural requirements; (2) Horizontal letdown heat exchanger S/N 2168-4B in storage was checked for weld appearance, arc strikes, storage condition, quality assurance records including receiving inspection, storage and quality

- certifications were reviewed; (3) Containment In-process and completed vertical/horizontal welds were checked in order to ascertain whether they were consistent with applicable code

{ASME Section III, Div. 2, Winter 75) requirements.

Welds inspected were between the 13th and 14th rings and were identified as follows:

Weld Number Status 10-B14 8-B14, Vertical 4-B14, Vertical 6-B14, Vertical 5-B14, Vertical 3-B14, Vertical 2-B14, Vertical 6-B13 and 7-B13 to 6-B14 7-B13 and 10-B13 to 4-B14 10-B13 and 11-B13 to 8-B14 Fitup Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Fitup Fitup Fitup The inspector observed and discussed setup procedures and the performance of spot radiography on liner plate welds.

Discussion with CBSI represen-tative disclosed that further welding on the liner had stopped pending resolution of a dimensional tolerance problem which was being evaluated.

Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

6.

Steel Structures and Supports - Welding Procedure Specifications and Quality Assurance Procedures (Units 1 and 2)

The licensee's corporate QA manual No, 1 Rev.

8 establishes requirements for control of work and quality to be consistent with specifications and engineering drawings and, for the development and control of procedures (welding).

Also, the licensee's ASME, QA Manual provides for controls of weld procedure specification (WPS) qualifications, weld material, weld equipment and qualification of welders/operators.

The engineering and construction QA procedures provide the measures to implement the requirements of the corporate and ASME QA Manuals.

Construction Manual procedure MP-01 revision 5, "Qualification of Welding Procedures",

addresses the applicability of RGs 1.50 and 1.44 the measures to implement the requirements of the corporate and ASME QA manuals.

Section IX of the ASME Code 1974 Edition with Summer 1975 addenda controls weld procedure qualifications.

Four randomly selected WPSs involving shielded metal arc, (SMAW) and gas tungsten arc (GTA) processes, or a combination of both, were selected for review.

These were identified as follows:

-4-WPS Process(es)

Procedure ualification Record Pl"1-A-1 SHAW P1"1-A-2 SHAM Pl-1-BA-1 SHAW/GTA Pl-1-BA"3 SHAW/GTA 01 Revision 1 2/10/78 02 Revision 1 10/14/78 01, 2/10/76)

05 10/1/78 15 5/18/78 Each of the above WPSs and their supporting PgR's were reviewed to ascertain whether essential, supplementary and/or nonessential variables including thermal treatment were consistent with code requirements; whether WPSs were properly qualified and their supporting PgRs were accurate and retriev-able; whether all required mechanical tests had been performed and the results met minimum requirements; whether the Pcs had been reviewed and certified by appropriate personnel; and whether any revisions and/or changes to nonessential variables were noted.

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

Steel Structures and Supports - Meld material Control (Units 1 and 2)

The warehouse and rod issue station 1 were inspected to ascertain whether control and issuing practices were in compliance with site approved procedure HP-03 Rev. 4.

Areas of specific interest included material storage, identi-fication, segregation and cleanliness, rod oven temperature control, records and material heandling.

(}uality records for heat numbers 421C8671 and 421C9521 were reviewed for compliance with material procurement specification 021 Rev.

4 and receipt inspection.

No deviations or items of noncompliances were identified.