IR 05000400/1979005
| ML18003A500 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/1979 |
| From: | Conlon T, Girard E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16341B151 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-79-05, 50-400-79-5, 50-401-79-05, 50-401-79-5, 50-402-79-04, 50-402-79-4, 50-403-79-04, 50-403-79-4, NUDOCS 7903280124 | |
| Download: ML18003A500 (6) | |
Text
~S RE0I, Gi 'po Cy C
O IlA O~
Wp*y+
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos.:
50-400/79-05, 50-401/79-05, 50-402/79-04 and 50-403/79-04 I,icensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1, 2,
and
Docket Nos.:
50-400, 50-401, 50-402 and
$0-403 License Nos.:
CPPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-160 and CPPR-161 Inspection at Shearon Harris Site near Raleigh, North Carolina Inspector:
E. H.
G'
d at Signed Approved by:
T.
.
on on, Section Chief, RCESB Date Signed Inspection on February 5-8, 1979 This routine, unannounced inspection involved 25 inspector-hours on-site in the areas of review of containment liner welding-related specification and procedure requirements (Units 1 and 2); fitup of service water piping weld (Unit 3); storage and tagging of spent fuel piping (Units
and 4); requirements for control of cold spring in piping (Units
through 4); and containment (structural steel welding)-review of quality records (Unit 1).
Results In the five areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7 903280 X2~
~
~
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Em lo ees dR G,
-G.
"V.
R.
M. Parsons, Site Manager L. Forehand, Principal QA Specialist 0. White, Material's/Codes Engineer C. Loring, Senior QA Specialist (Mechanical)
Safarian, Senior QA Specialist (Welding)
Fletcher, QA Technician Other Or anizations R. Learch, Project Superintendent, Chicago Bridge and Iron (CBI)
R. P. Hazelip, Project Welding and QA Superintendent, Chicago Bridge and Iron (CBI)
R. B. West, QA Technician, Chicago Bridge and Iron (CBI)
-Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 8,
1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
There was considerable discussion regarding requirements for control of, cold spring in piping.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Ins ection Findin s Not examined.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations.
New unresolved items identified during this inspec-tion are discussed in Paragraph a
5.
Inde endent Ins ection a
~
Review of Containment Liner Weldin -Related S ecification and Procedure Re uirements Units 1 and
The inspector reviewed welding-related requirements given in the licensee's engineering specification and in his contractor's procedures for the containment liners to determine their compliance with PSAR commitments.
The engineering specification reviewed is EBASCO Specification CAR-SH-AS-1, Revision 8.
The contractor procedures reviewed are contained in CBI Contract equality Assurance Handbook, Containment I,incr, Shearon Harris, CBI Project 84030, Revision 9.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
b.
Fitu of Service Water Pi in Weld (Unit 3)
The NRC inspector observed completed fitup of service water system weld 4-SW-2-FW-15.
The code for this weld is ASME Section III, Class 3.
The fitup, entries on the weld data report and weld material requisition, and stamping identifica-tion beside the weld, were examined for compliance with the code and requirements given in procedures MP-03, Revision
(Welding Material Control) and MP-05, Revision 4 (Procedure for Stamping of Weldments).
c ~
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
Stora e and Ta in of S ent Fuel Pi in (Units 1 and 4)
The inspector examined two spent fuel piping spools for compli-ance with the requirements of procedure CgC-7, Revision
(Marking and Tagging)
and CgC-8, Revision 1 (Storage Control).
The spool pieces were identified as 1-SF-10-1 and 1-SF-10-4.
d.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
Re uirements for Control of Cold S rin in Pi in Units 1 throu h
The NRC inspector questioned the licensee regarding the adequacy of his requirements for control of cold spring in piping.
In response to the NRC inspector's questions, the licensee stated he had checked a number of his drawings and found that they specified
"no cold spring permitted".
Based upon the drawing notes, the licensee stated that he intended to examine the
requirements further with his staff and his Architect-Engineer.
The NRC inspector indicated his concern for workable requirements in this area prior to a need for their use.
The inspector informed the licensee that this item would be an unresolved item, identified for record as 400/79-05-01.
6; Containment (Structural Steel Weldin )-Review of ualit Records a
~
The inspector selected certain field welds where welding, testing and inspection (QC) activities have been completed for record review.
These records were reviewed to determine conformance with procedural requirements in the areas of visual and dimensional inspections, weld history, heat treat-ment (if required)>
NDEp weld repair, welder qualifications
'and QC inspector qualifications.
Containment Welds Joint 2D Joint B2 to B3 Joint Bl to B2 b.
Records for Weld material control were reviewed for identity and conformance with specifications, pre-issue storage and issue.
c ~
The inspector selected and reviewed audits conducted by CBI in the general area of containment welding to determine if proper, timely and adequate corrective action was taken.
These are identified below.
Audit Audit Report 1978-3 Audit Releases Dated 11/24 Audit Release Dated ll/29 d.
The inspector selected licensee identified nonconformances to determine whether the records were complete, legible, retrievable and properly closed out.
The nonconformances reviewed were CBI "Nonconformance Control List" numbers ll, 25, 16, 27 and 32.
Within the areas examined, there were no items of noncompliance or deviations identifie ~p
~
I