IR 05000400/1979025
| ML18003A827 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 01/03/1980 |
| From: | Conlon T, Lehahan J, Lenahan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18003A824 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-79-25, 50-401-79-25, 50-402-79-24, 50-403-79-24, NUDOCS 8001250586 | |
| Download: ML18003A827 (8) | |
Text
~S RKCII
~4
~o Yj+~
~O
++*a+
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,G EORG IA30303 JAN g Ig8O Report Nos. 50-400/79-25, 50-401/79-25, 50-402/79-24 and 50-403/79-24 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
'
Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401, 50-402, 50-403 License Nos.
CPPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-160, and CPPR-161 Inspection at Shearon Harris site near Raleigh, North Inspector:
J. J.
Lenahan Approved by:~~
T. E. Conlon, Section Chief, RCES Branch SUHMARY Inspection on December 12-14, 1979 Areas Inspected Carolinaz-8-8~
Date Signed (~<~fQ Date Signed This routine, unannounced inspection involved 21 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of lakes, dams and canals quality records, structural concrete QA/QC controls, work activities, and quality records, construction status, and licensee action on previous inspection findings.
Results Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8oo>p5o Wf6,
e
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- R. M. Parsons, Site Manager
- G. L. Forehand, Principal QA Specialist
- G. M. Simpson, Principal Construction Inspector
+A ~ M. Lucas, Resident Engineer
+J. F. Nevill, Senior Engineer - Civil
"-L. F. Garner, Supervisor, Civil Construction Inspection
- N. J. Chiangi, Manager, Engineering and Construction QA D. S.
Canady, Geologist A. Fuller, Area Engineer, Main Dam R. Marler, Area Engineer, West Aux Dam E. L. Kelley, Senior Civil QA Specialist H. Casanova, 2nd Shift QA Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included 7 Civil construction inspectors and 3 Civil QA inspectors.
Other Organizations E. Hedgecock, Soils Engineer, EBASCO
- W. D. Goodman, Project Manager, Daniel Construction Company-Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on December 14, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Open) Noncompliance (400/79-07-02, 401/79-07-02, 402/79-06-02, and 403/79-06-02):
Failure to Place Embankment Core Fills at Specified Moisture Content.
The core fillin the West Auxiliary dam in the area of the diversion is the only remaining dam embankment core fillwhich was not placed at the required moisture content.
After performing an engineering evaluation of this material, the licensee has concluded that it will be necessary to remove the previously placed diversion area core material and replace it with new impervious fill.
The new impervious fillwill be placed in accordance with the revised procedures and specifications which were reviewed and approved by NRR and IE:RII.
This item remains open pending removal of the previously placed west auxiliary dam diversion area core filland placement of new impervious core materia.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspector examined the following areas:
a.
Construction Status b.
Partial placement of pour number WAD ST 019, a foundation base mat for the east wing wall of the west auxiliary, dam spillway.
c.
CPK procedures CQC-l, "Tool and Measuring Device Control", and TP-4,
"Calibration of Controlled Tools".
d.
COL QA Procedure number CQA-1, "Personnel Training and Qualifications" No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
6.
Containment (Structural Concrete I 8 II) - Review of Quality Assurance Implementing Procedure
, Unit 1, 2, 3, and
The inspector performed a follow-up inspection of QA/QC controls for structural concrete.
The following procedures and specifications were examined to determine if work activities and quality control and quality assurance functions were provided for as stipulated in NRC requirements and PSAR Section 5.
a.
EBASCO Specifications (1)
(2)
(3)
CAR-SH-CH 6, "Concrete" CAR-SH-CH 7A, "Concrete Reinforcing Steel - Furnishing, Fabrica-tion, and Delivery" CAR-SH"CH 15, "Mechanical Splicing of Concrete Reinforcing Steel" b.
CPSL Quality Control Procedures (CQC)
(1)'QC-13,
"Concrete Control" (2)
CQC-15,
"Cadweld Control" C ~
d.
CPSL QA Procedure number CQA-6, "Concrete Placement Monitoring" CPS<i, Work Procedures (WP)
(1)
WP-1, "Installation of Cadweld Splices" (2)
WP-3, "Concrete Material Handling" (3)
WP-4, "Concrete Production and Delivery" (4)
WP-5, "Concrete Placement" (5)
WP-9, "Batch Plant Production and Delivery Equipment Maintenance and Inspection"
'
(6)
WP 1 1 y "Fabrication and Insta Ilation of Rebar" (7)
WP-15,
"Cadweld Splicer Qualifications" e.
CPSL Technical Procedures (TP)
(1)
TP-15, "Concrete Placement Inspection" (2)
TP-22, "Inspection of Rebar Installation" f.
CPGL Quality Control Instructions (QCI)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
QCI 13.1,
"Concrete Compressive Strength Testing" QCI 13.2, "Batch Plant Inspection" QCI 13', "Concrete Field Tests" QCI 15.1, "Tensile Testing of Cadweld Splices and Reinforcing Steel Bars" QCI 15.2, "Maintaing Splicers Qualification Status" QCI 15.3, "Maintaining Cadweld Splice Iocation Drawings" QCI 15.4,
"Cadweld Splicing Inspection" No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.
7 ~
Containment (Structural Concrete I) - Observation of Work and Work Activities, Unit 2 The inspector observed partial placement and inspection of pour number 2CBSL 216 002 in the foundation base mat of the Unit 2 reactor containment building.
Acceptance criteria examined by the inspector were those proce-dures listed in paragraph 6 and the following drawings:
a
~
Drawing number CAR-2167-G-0880,
"Containment Building Base Slab Mat-Plan at Elevation 216.0, Unit 2" b.
Drawing Number CAR-2167-G-0881,
"Containment Building Base Mat-Sections and Details - Unit 2 c.
Drawing numbers CAR - 216?-G-0882 through -0889,
"Containment Building Base Slab Mat - Unit 2 -Reinforcing Steel" d.
Drawing number CAR - 2168-G147
"Containment Building - Unit 2 - Anchor Bolts" e.
Drawing number CAR - 2168 - 308 SG7,
"Containment Building - Unit 2-Embedded Steel" Forms were tight, clean and level.
Rebar was'properly installed and clean.
Placement activities pertaining to delivery time, free fall, flow distance, layer thickness and consolidation conformed to specification.
Concrete placement activities were continously monitored by QC and QA inspectors.
Examination of batch tickets indicated that the specified design mix was being delivered.
Samples of plastic concrete were obtained from the pumpline discharge and tested in accordance with specification require-
ments.
Test results indicated that plastic concrete bein
s or s ump, air content and temperature.
Examination of the batch plant indicated mater'nd accurate batch an in icated materials were being controlled e
a c
records were being generated.
(
d dm an a
ixtures) were observed to be specification requirements.
Batch lants ac n s.
a c
p an s activites were continously The OC and Q
QA inspectors were interviewed re ardin g
g p o No deviations or items tems of noncompliance were identified.
Containment (Structural Concrete I) - Review of Quality Records - Unit 2 The inspector examined the followin ualit in e nit 2 reactor building base mat:
a.
Central Batch plant scale calibration records h
b.
. Pour card c ~
Field Inspection Report for (1)
Watersto s
(2)
Reinforcing Steel aterstops (3)
Embedded lates p
es, penetrations, and anchor bolts No deviations or items
'tems of noncompliance were identified.
Lakes, Dams, and Canals-- Review of Quality Records - U t 1,
ni s
, 2, 3, and
The inspector examined the followin records the main dam:
o owing records relating to construction of a.
Results of inplace density test er October, 1979 y
es performed on the rock fillzone in b.
Results of grain size analyses tests erform p
c.
Results of in lac p
e density, relative densit and rai test performed on coarse and f'ne arse an ine filler materials placed to date.
Acceptance criteria examined by the ins ector SER S
o
7 EBASCO specification CAR-SH-CH-4 Dk dCh l"
dCPM P
No deviations or item ems of noncompliance were identifie ~
V