IR 05000400/1979001
| ML18003A440 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 02/08/1979 |
| From: | Ang W, Bryant J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18003A438 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-79-01, 50-400-79-1, 50-401-79-01, 50-401-79-1, NUDOCS 7903200185 | |
| Download: ML18003A440 (5) | |
Text
~R Rfays fp
~4
Cp A
s n
C O
I O~
os r+
ro
++*++
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos.: 50-400/79-1 and 50-401/79-1 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 336 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Facility Name:
Shearon Hairis Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and
Docket NoseI 50-400 and 50-401 License NoseI CPPR-158 and CPPR-159 Inspection at Wake and Chatham Counties North Carolina Inspector:
lv s'
t W. P.
Ang
I Date Signed Approved by:
ryan
,
S ion Chief, RCSESB a
e Signed SUMMARY Inspection on January 16-19, 1979 This routine unannounced inspection involved 24 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of concrete work activities, storage and records of reactor vessel internals, and storage and records of material for safety related structures (boric acid tanks).
Results No apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
~90'001~
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Em lo ees
-"RE M. Parsons, Site Manager-G. L. Forehand, Site Principal (}A Specialist
- A. M. Lucas, Resident Engineer
""C. S. Hinnant, Electrical/Mechanical Design Engineer L. Garner - Civil - Construction Supervisory Inspector
"Attended exit interview.
Other licensee employees contacted included four construction crafts-men, two technicians.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 19, 1979, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
No apparent items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Ins ection Findin s
4.
Not inspected.
Unresolved Items 5.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
Inde endent Ins ection Effort A walk through inspection of the concrete batch plant and the concrete testing laboratory was performed.
Calibration of measuring equipment was inspected.
General work practices were observed and inspected for conformance with relevant site procedures and licensee commitments.
A concrete pour of a wall for the Unit 1 waste processing building was observed.
Reinforcing bar placement and spacing was observed and inspected.
EBASCO Drawing CP and L CAR 2167 G0561-Standard Details-Concrete Reinforcing Steel Tolerances was reviewed and used for the reinforcing steel spacing inspection.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.
Reactor Vessel Internals Observation of Work and Work Activities-Units 1 and
CP and L QC Procedure CQC-8 Revision 1 (Storage Control) and Construction Procedure AP-XIII-05 Revision 8 (Material Storage)
were reviewed to determine licensee requirements for storage of the reactor vessel internals.
The Units 1 and 2 reactor vessel internals stored in metal houses were inspected for compliance with licensee requirements and PSAR commitments.
Protective coverings and supports were also inspected.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Safet -Related Structures (Structural Steel and Su ort I) - Observation of Work and Work Activities - Units 1 and
Material for the fabrication of Boric Acid Tanks for Units 1 and 2 were inspected in storage for compliance with licensee storage requirements noted in paragraph 6 and licensee PSAR commitments.
EBASCO Procedure CAR-SH-AS-10 Revision 2 - Field Erected Storage Tanks - ANS Nuclear Safety Class 2 and 3 - Seismic Class I was reviewed for relevant storage and receiving inspection requirements.
QC Procedure CQC-6 Revision 62 - Receiving Inspection also was reviewed for relevant receiving inspection requirements.
Receiving inspection records for the boric acid tank plates were reviewed for compliance with licensee procedural requirements and PSAR commitments.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Reactor Vessel Installation - Observation of Work and Work Activities - Unit 1 and
The reactor vessels were inspected in their stored location for compliance with licensee storage requirements noted in paragraph 6.
In addition the reactor vessels were inspected for seals and devices to identify vessel internal atmospheric condition.
Condition of protective coatings and support structures and dunnage were also inspected to verify conformance with license storage procedures and PSAR commitments.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie /
'