IR 05000397/1986029
| ML17278B054 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 10/07/1986 |
| From: | Johnson P, Qualls P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17278B053 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-397-86-29, NUDOCS 8611040395 | |
| Download: ML17278B054 (8) | |
Text
e U. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No.:
50-397/86"29 Docket No.:
50-397 Licensee:
Washington Public Power Supply System P.
O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Washington Nuclear Project No.
(WNP.-2)
WNP-2 Site near Richland, Washington Facility Name:
Inspection j
', Inspection, at:
Conduc ed:
September 22-26, 1986 Inspect'.or:
P.
M.
ualls Reactor Inspect:or App'roved by: ~
f~g P.
H. Johnson, Chief Reactor Projects Section
~Summar:
Ins ection on Se tember 22-26 1986 (50-397/86-29)
Date Signed t
zo reed Date Signed items on the Open Items Iist.
During this inspection, Inspection Procedures 30703, 62704, 90712, 92700, 92701, and 93703 were utilized for guidance.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
8bi1040395 8b1020 PDR ADOCK 05000397 G
E
&1 lh l'
~~
k e<
v R
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted
"-C.
"-p.
"cs.
'"B.
C.
f Powers, WNP-2 Plant Manager Baker, WNP-2 Assistant'Plant Manager Powell, Licensing Manager Washington, Compliance Engineer Mertens, (}A Compliance Engineer Eggan.,
Senior Pire Protection Engineer
- Attended Exit Meeting on September 22, 1986.
I In addition, other members of licensee staff was contacted during the course of the inspection.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Findin s I
a.
(50-397/85-11-01)
(Closed) - NSAG Members Onsite The licensee has obtained Amendment 18,to their Technical Specifications which incorporates the NSAG review process discussed
'n this item.
This item is closed.
b.
(50-397/85-11-05)
(0 en) - Vendor exiles Licensee action on this item is incomplete.
A licensee employee is evaluating the proper actions to take.
This item is open c.
(50-397 83-39-12)
(Closed) - Pire Pum Test Se uence Licensee actions to correct this item appear adequate.
The sequence tests were conducted during the Spring of 1986 outage and the pumps started in the proper sequence.
This item is closed.
3.
Generic Letter Followu a.
(GL-85-22) (Closed) - Potential for Loss of Post-LOCA Recirculation Ca abilit Due to Debris Blocka e
The licensee evaluated the potential problem described in Generic Letter 85-22 to determine the applicability at WNP-2.
The licensee determined that the potential did not 'exist at WNP-2 for the following reasons:
Pipe insulation is enclosed in metal coverings; The ECCS suction pumping requirements are less than 8000 gpm; The NPSH margins are acceptable; and The debris screens are not significantly smaller than the 100 square foot area specified in the generic letter.
This item is close r f
I II
~,t+
I I
Ip Il ill t
II
, ~
I il
2, 4.
Information Notice Followu The inspector reviewed licensee followup of the following Information Notices:
a.
IN-84-70 (0 en) - Water I,evel Instrumentation With a Common Reference Ie The licensee staff evaluated the Information Notice and recommended
'ctions for concurrence on October 18, 1985.
As of September 24, 1986, their file had no record that the recommended actions had been reviewed or taken.
This item is open.
b.
IN-84-83 (Closed) - Various Batter Problems The licensee evaluated this Notice and changed Procedure 10.25.5.7.C.3 AC to incorporate the Notice information.
This item is closed.
c.
IN-85-23 (0 en) - Inade uate Surveillance and Post.-modification
~Testin The licensee received this notice in April 1985. -It appeared from the file that initial review was assigned in December 1985 and reassigned in August 1986.
At the time of the inspection, it appeared that the licensee had not completed his initial appraisal of the notice.
This item is open.
d.
IN-85-66 (0 en) - As-Built Construction Drawin Discre ancies This notice was received by the licensee in'September of 1985.
Internal action was assigned in October 1985.
No record was in the plant file of completion of the internal action.
This item is open.
e.
IN-85-74 (0 en) - Station Batter Problems The licensee reviewed this notice and determined that a number of actions needed to be taken.
At the time of the inspection, all aspects had been addressed with the exception of writing procedures.
This item is open.
s At the exit meeting, the inspector discussed with the licensee the need to review Information Notices'and',other oper'ating event reports promptly to alert thefoselves to potential problems that"has existed at, other facilities and'to allow them'selves an opportunity to prevent the occurrence of similar problem's at their site.
The licensee stated that they were salgeady taking actions to imp'rove their review of operating event reports.
k s IE Bulletin Followu a.
Bulletin 86-01 (Closed) - Hinimum Flow Lo ic That Could Disable RHR
~Pnm s
s The licensee, responded to the bulletin jn a letter to Region V dated May 30, 1986.
The letter states that the bulletin was not of I
W t hg C
I I
Ilh I" I
l I'
P I
Ih l W Il'
h W
C l I
I
~, 'I P
n
'. r F
'I t.
\\
W
)W
',
V II W
l~
t h
V P',
h Ih V WP 4 W 'l PCI I
I
.I I
rh l
r
>
hh kkl k
I
"I
'I
~ 'P kh
I'
P K F =)
h
P.-
concern for WNP-2 since each RHR System has its own minimum flow t
valve and return line.
Mith this design, the bulletin requires no further actions.
This item is closed.
6.
LER Review J
Based on in-office review in accordance following LERs are closed:
85-'6, 85-09, 85-10, 85-12, 85-17, 85-'53, 85-54, 85-56, 85-60, 85-62, 86-15) 86-16) 86"17, 86"18) 86-22)
with IE Manual Chapter 90712, the 85-18, 85-33, 85-51)
85-52)
85-63, 86-11) 86-13, 86-14, and 86-24.
TER 85-16 is closed based on satisfactory completion of the corrective actions identified in the IER.
LER 86-26 discusses an ESF trip of the RMCU system.
Their corrective action to change the calibration method of the system electronic summer was reviewed by the inspector.
No change in the Technical Specification setpoint was indicated.
LER 86-26 is closed.
7.
Plant Tour The inspector noted a significant'mprovement in plant cleanliness and in control of combustible materials.
The inspector identified no material problems in the plant.
The inspector observed no health physics problems during his walkthrough.
The inspector identified to the licensee at the exit meeting that he
~ observed two electrical cabinets open with no warning tape barrier which could present a personnel hazard.
The inspector observed some tools and drawings stored inside of two different low voltage communications cabinets even though it appeared that adequate lockers to store tools were nearby in the room.
No violations or deviations were identified during the plant walkthrough.
An exit meeting was held on September 22, 1986.
The items listed were discussed at that time.
~ r~~fl n'.
~
I
~
I
~'
i