IR 05000389/1976003
Text
.
"
'
,[
me00g'o UNITEJ STATES
-
.,
,
NUCLEAR RE2ULATORY COMMISSION
.
,,
[
,
o REGION il
'
$
$
230'PEACHTREE STREET, N.W. SulTE S18-
,
ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30303.
"$.
/
.
....
i
-
.
..
.
.
.
IE Inspection Report No. 50-389/76-3 Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company P. O. Box 013100 Miami, Florida 33101 Facility Name:
St. Lucie Unit 2
~
Docket No.:
50-389
License No.:
Pending Category:
Al
.
Location:
Hutchinson Island, Florida Type of License:
800 Mwe (CE)
Type of Inspection:
Routine,' Unannounced, Construction Dates of Inspection:
November 18-19, 1976 Dates of Previous Inspection:
September 22-24, 1976 Principal Inspector:
D. H. Danielson, Reactor Inspector Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch
.
Accompanying Inspector:
R. W. Wright, Reactor Inspector Engineering Support Section No. 1 Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Other Accompanying Personnel:
R. W. Compton, Reactor Inspector (Training)
Engineering Support Section No. 1 Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Bran h Principal Inspector:
b
/!/Z!77
-
D. H. Danielson, Reactor Inspector
'Date Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Reviewed by:
b I!/
J. C.
ant, ChiefV Date I
Pro s Section Reactor Cons,truction and Engineering Support Branch l
8500150635 850703 i
.
L
.
.
.
.
,
,-
.
,
-
.
,
~
.
-2-
.
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/76-3
.
'
\\
'-
f.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
?
,
,
I.
Deviations None Licensee Action on Previously Identified Deviations II.
None III. New Unresolved Items
,"
~
None Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items IV.
None V.
Desian Changes None VI. Unusual Occurrences None VII. Other Significant Findings None VIII. Management Interview On September 24, 1976, the inspectors met with Mr. J. E. Vessely, Manager of Quality Assurance, and r.mbers of the plant staff to j
It was noted that
'
review the scope and findings of the inspection.
within the scope of the inspection we identified no significant deviations from the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
f i
i
!
l
.
-
I
...
_. -
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
,
s
.
'
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/76-3 I-1
/
/
DETAILS I Prepared by:
.
.,
Data R. W. Wright, Reictor, Inspector
.
.
Engineering Support S'ection No. 1 Reactor Construction and Engineering i
Support Branch N 444
/
- 7/o
' Data D. H. Danielson, Reactor Inspector Projects Section Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Dates of Inspection: November 18-19, 1976 Reviewed byt_
W#
<>
/
N 74
' Data
.
T. E. Conlon, Chief Engineering Support Section No. 1 Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch 1.
Persons Contacted Florida Power and Light Company (FP&L)_
a.
.
,
B. J. Escue - Projects Construction Superintendent N. T. Weems - Assistant QA Manager, Construction A. M. Anderson - QA Engineer, Electrical L. T. Page - QA Enginesr, Civil 0. J. Karch - QA Engineer, Civil D. R. Stone - Project QC Supervisor R. G. Reesby - Area QC Supervisor, Civil J. E. Vessely - Manager of QA b.
Contractor Organizations Ebasco Services. Inc. (Ebasco).
J. E. Ramondo - Project Superintendent J. C. Murphy - Sr. Resident Engineer 2.
Scope This inspection was conducted to review the licensee's plans and preparations.for the construction delay resulting from the suspension
.
D
$
'
,
.
.
,
.
.
'
.
.
%
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/76-3 I-2
.
i of their LWA-2 activities, to ob' serve the statustof completed site preparation work, and continue with the review qf associated quality records.
3.
Construction Delay Personnel Layoff a.
Seventy-five percent of the working force, including supervision, U.
are expected to be laid off by the end of November 1976.
S. Testing and FP&L have begun relocating some of their QC personnel to other sites. *The St. Lucia site QC Section is expected to be depleted to fifty percent of its original personnel by January 1, 1977.
.
b.
Construction Status The contractor completed the pouring of the 5-inch containment The dished working slab prior to the suspension of work.
working slab has been weighted down with approximately 10 feet of water and the excavation's dewatering system is being maintained. Piezometric readings are continuing to be taken and recorded on a daily basis. Raymond International,(RI) has completed the pile driving for the east wing wall and!the intake cofferdam structure.
RI has demobilized and removed
its equipment from the job site due to the suspension of work.
The interior PVC well casings for the intake cofferdam dewatering structure have been driven to their required depths; however, the wells have not been developed nor have the submersible l
pumps been installed.
Construction Delay Preparations c.
In accordance with " Recommendations for Implementation of Revised Delivery Requirements for Existing Purchase Orders"
,
'
Rev 0 dated September 19, 1976, the contractor is in the process of reviewing all outstanding purchase orders and delaying the arrival of whatever equipment and materials he can and arranging for storage of these itema at the vendors'
Studies are being conducted of all premises where possible.
,
available storage areas on site and for nearby off site facili-ties to assure space is available for storage of equipment and material for which delivery cannot be stopped.
Long term storage and maintenance requirements are being requested from
.
!
all equipment vendors.
In addition, the contractor is conducting
,
,
.
o
__
.
.-
.-
,'.
-
'
-
-
.
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/76-3 I-3
studies on protection of stainless stee,1 and carbon ste 1 pipe, cathodic protection of sheet piling,' protection of rebar, and protection of CB&I plate material.
The contractor is implementing existing administrative site
,
procedure ASP-17 entitled, " Preventative Maintenance" on all pertinent equipment received to date.
An acidifying and well cleaning program has just been performed on the existing dewatering system. The effluent from this system is monitored in accordance with ASP-9, " Environmental Protection Control."
The concrete batch plant (Maule Concrete) has been shut down and one man will probably.be retained on site on a standby basis.
Existing requirements relating to shelf life, tempera-ture,and protection of concrete ingredients such as cement and admixtures will be adhered to and may eventually require removal of some of these stored materials from the job site.
4.
Site Preparation - Subsurface Preparation Acceptability (Containment Location)
The activities associated with the subject foundation compaction were found in conformance with the following acceptance criteria:
PSAR comunitments, Ebasco specification FLO 2998.471 Rev. 4, construc-tion site procedure CSP-25 Rev 0, and quality instruction:.QI 10.10
,
Rev 1.
Although no work was observed, extensive IE review of the records pertinent to the final prepartion and recompaction of the in-place foundation soils at the bottom of the reactor building excavation verified that the completed work was accomplished in accordance with licensee procedures.
Maps depicting soil sample and field density testing locations, laboratory test results for moisture-density relationships (modified proctor tests), particle sieve analysis data and in-place Troxler moisture-density test results were examined in inspection report numbers C-76-235, 236, 249, 250, 263 and 277.
The character of material compacted, frequency of soils testing and the percent of compaction achieved were found in accordance with specification FLO-2998.471, Rev. 4.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort a.
Audits Reviewed The following FP&L site QA audits were examined for deficiencies found, completeness and recommendations presented:
.
O
.
'
-
..
,
'
.
.
'
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/76-3 I-4
.
(1)
Audit No. QAC 76-38,
" Soils compa6 tion and Evaluation (September'30, 1976)
Before Placement of 2-inch Mudmat" (2)
Audit No.' QAC 76-39
" Inspection of Concrete Mudmat (October 20, 1976)
Placement and Waterproof Membrane" (3) Audit No. QAC 76-40,
" Inspection of Concrete Mudmat (October 26, 1976)
Placeaant and Waterproof Membrane" b.
Procedure Review
.
The following Ebasco" construction site procedure and Maule contractor operating procedure were examined for conformance to SAR, commitments, applicable codes and standards:
(1)
CSP-2 (Rev 0),
" Concrete Placement" (2)
COP-3-1 (Rev 0), " Batch Plant" Within the scope of this inspection, no significant deviations from the licensee's LWA-2 authorization were identified.
.
O w