IR 05000389/1976001
Text
- _.
'
.-
.
g.
.
. ~ :
o o.
.:
.
_.,,
-
.
.-
.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
g g.
s i
.. neason u 238 PEACMNI'EE STREET. M. W. SUtTE SIS
_
ATI.AMTA. GEORGI A 30303
--
i
's'
-
-
'
<.
-
..
. g.
t
-
.
j
-
-
.
.
.
i
'
s
.1 IX Inspection Report No. 50-389/76 b
!
,.
i Licenses: Florida Power and Light Company
'
.P. O. Box 013100 Miami, Florida 33101,
_
l
.Pacility Name:
St. Lucia Unit 2 ". --
-
i
"
-
'I Docket No. :
50-389
-
-
I License No.:
Pending j
Category:
, A1 j
- ' -
!
Incation: Hutthinson Island, Florida
-
Y r
~
Type of License: 800 Mwe (CE)
f
.
,
.
)
Type of Inspection: Routine, Un=nnaunced, Preconstruction
' "
-
.
Dates of Inspection: July 28-30, 1976
%
.
Dates of Previous Inspection: December 16-18, 1975 Principal Inspector:
D. H. Danielson,. Reactor Inspector
..
Projects Section.
Reactor Construction and Engineering
,
'
'
i Suppore Branch Accompanying Inspector:
R. W. Wright, Reactor Inspector Engineering Support Section No. 1 Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Brancf:
Other Accompanying Personnel:
C. E. Murphy, Chief
~
Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch
,'
Principal Inspector:
--
"
[>
r D. H. Danielson, Reactor Inspector Date Projects Section
-
Reactor Construction'and. Engineering
.
Support Branch
'.
LEIGHTOB4-293 PDR
'
,
,
- _ _. _. - _.
_ _...
.
- -
.. - - - - -
-.. - -
- - -,
- - - - - - ~ - - - - - - -, - -,, - - - - -,, - - -.. - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - -
- -
,.
_ _ _ _ - _
.,
t. :.. -
o
-
-
..
.
.l.
1-s*
' ',. ~.
.
.
,
"
'j
--
i*
.,
,
.
-
.
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/76-1.-
-2-
.
- e = "
1.,
,
.
.
..
'
-
,
-
.
l!
M lv>s.. h J M /M
"
'
navi a dy:
.
r-Data j,
[
C'. Bryagg. Chief '
y rojects Section
a
'! '
Reactor Construction and Engineering
!
li Support Branch
'
,
.l '
I,1
-
,
'
j-
,
i:
_
jt TN.,,
-
s
,
- 1
.
.
.
!.
.
..
.
~t
.
.:
!
s'
,
i
!
.
s a
.3
.
.
!b i
.
"
,g a
'
.
.
-
_
a l..
,
- 1 i
I
.1
!
,-
.
I
<
,k I
-
y i
-
. ;
i -
,
"I
.
..
.
'
.s I
.
S
-
.
e
>..,
_.
m..
,
~
'
\\.
.-,. -..
-._ -
-.
-
_ _.
-_.
_
_ _ _ _.
t
!...
..
o o
'
-
-
.
.
-
. -..
- .
.
.
.
..
IE Rpt. No. 50-389/76-1;
.,-3-
-
,-
.
.
,_.
.
.
.
\\
.s i
.
.
- .
,
'
<
3 *
SIIMNARY OF FINDINGS
.3
-
.
I
.
.
I.
Deviations
^
.
,
I
}
None
.
,
II. Licensea Action on Previously Identified Deviations-
.;
,
'
hm
-
i t
ll.
'
III. New Unresolved Items
-
'
'
,
-
.
.
i None i
'
.
IV. Status of Previously Raported Unresolved Items
,
'
l
.l
_
!
hm
.
.
"
[
V.
Desian Channes
.
a
., -,
'
hm a
VI. Unusual Occurrences.
'.;;
,,
-
Il
'a
.]
Nona
'
i i
VII. Other Sigsificant Findinas
..-
.
l hm
i VIII. Mansaament Interview
.
On July 30, 1976, the inspectors met with Mr. B. J. Escue, Project Construction Superintendent, and members of the plant staff to
!
!
review the scope and f4=d4=g= of the inspection. It was noted that within the scope of the inspection we identified no, signi-
ficant deviations from the requiramants of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
.
,.
p
l l
.
.
'
.
-
.
I (-
..
"
~
- - - * + -.
.
_ _ _ _ _
'
~+.-e.
-....,,.
,,....... _,,,
'
_ _ _
___
_
- *
,. * *
-
.A
.
,
,. -
-
e _
,
,
,
.*
,
,
~
IE Rpt. No.. 50-389/76-1 t-1
-
-
,
,
,
I
- * "
j
-
.
.._
'
DETATTR I Prepared by:
.
i
'
' - D'.H.Danielson,*Redcto[ Inspector Data
!
Projects Section i
,
.
,
.
--
Reactor Construction and Engineering
,
Support Branch
'
s
'
Dates of Inspectiont. July 28-30, 1976 l
Reviewed.by:
3r w f h (/
"'
C. Br' yak Chihf Date-l
.
rojects section
-
.
!
-
e
-
. Reactor Construction and Engineering
-~
Support Branch
'
,
\\
,-
1.
Individua5s Contacted -
- - - -
--
Florida Power and Light Company (FP&L)
!j B. J. Escua - Project Construction Superintendent
.d N. T. Weems - Assistanc QA Manager, Construction A. M. Anderson - Senior QA Engineer, Electrical
'
.]$
D. R. Stone - Project QC Supervisor
-
.
2.
Scope of Inspection
!
-I
This inspection was performed to review the licensee's site audit activities and onsite contractor organizations' QA/QC progrann for site preparation activities authorized under an LWA-2.
'
t'
3.
Site Atidits
-
The PSAR, Chapter 17, par'agraph 17.1.18.5, specifies the FP&L audit comunitments. The detailed instructions for conducting and scheduling
'
~
'
audits are provided in Quality Procedure Nos. QR 18.1 and-QP 18.2, respectively.
,,
'.
To verify compliance with the above comunitments, the inspector av==4ned. reports and related records for five audits performed
'
since February 1976. This awa=4 nation covered audit p1===4ng, scope and purpose, documentation of results, management review, and followup of corrective action.
FP&L reports of audits that were
,
reviewed are as follows:
'
-
a.
EBASCO Document Control, QAC-EBASCO-76-16 b.
FP&L Document Control System, QAC-FPL-QC-76-17
.
e
- -4eche....,...,,, - -
pe+
-*.
-+.g...
..,me-mm-e..e e-
.
-.,e
_. %
-
-e m.m.
.
-
~-
-
.
.
. *
_
--
t
,
..
f 1.....
O
.
.
,
..
.
..
.
.
-
'I 2 i
~ '
IE Epc. No, 50-389/76-1
.
-
-
-
!
,
_
J.
' '
'
,,, -
._
-
-
-
.
FP&L QC Construction Material Control, QAC-FPL-CONSTR-QC-76-2 j
c.
'
-
.. s '.
.e.
-
- -
.
,
l d.
EBASCO Indoctrination and Training, QAC-EEASCO-76-3 l
i
.
-t e.
FP&L Construction QA Indoctrination and Training, QAC-FPL-l
~l CONSTRe-76-6
'
.
d
_.
-
I Within the areas examined, there were no deviations disclosed.
.i,
~
-
f 4.
Review of Contractor dA' Manual ~
+
i
)
The PSAR, Chapter 17,. paragraph 17.1.4.3, specifies the FP&L suppliers' ---
'
'
j QA. program evaluation commitments. The detailed instructions for
,
evaluation of a suppliers QA program are provided in Quality Proca.
'
.
l dure No. QP 4.3.
.
,
I
'Raymond International, Inc. is inse=114ag sheet piling for the
.
reactor cone =4nment ba41 ding cofferdam and the intake structure
{
cofferdam. The inspector reviewed the Raymond International QA.
annumi to assure adequate plans and procedures had been established M;l for their scope of work. This review included site organization,
.
management review, control of material and processes, control of
.
,
conditions adverse ce quality, document control, test control and control of test equipment, control of quality records and audits.
"
O In addition, documented evidence of FP&L evaluation and acceptance
'
of the Raymond International QA program and procedures was. reviewed by the inspector. Within the areas an=4nad, there were no devia-tions disclosed.
.-
.
.
_
d
-
.
I
!
-
.
%.
p
.
.
b
.
-...--w.em e
.
.
O h
.
~
.
.
..
-.
.
<.. -
-
.
'
'
~
IE Rpt. no. 50_389/76-1 II-l
-
-
,
.-
i9!7Ce DETAILS II Prepared by:
v.rvso i
E. W. Wright, React 6Y Inspector
' Data
'
- *
,
Engineering Support Section No. I l
'
.
,
j Reactor Construction and Engineering
.
Support Branch
Dates of Inspection: July 28-30, 1976 i
Reviewed by:
v
.P# '78 T. E Conlod, Chiefc/
/ Date
Engineering Support Section No. 1
.
j Reactor Construction and Engineering
_
'
Support * Brancir j
-
.
1.
Eersons Contacted
.
]
a.
Florida Power and Linhc Company (FP&L)
N'. T. Weema - Assistant QA Manager, Construction A. M. Anderson - QA Engineer, Electrical
'
L. T. Stone - QA Engineer, Civil B. J. Escus - Project Construction Superintendent
-
)
D. R. Stone - Project QC Supervisor
, ;1 R. G. Reesby - Area QC Supervisor (Civil)
.
'
-
.
' j b.
Contractor Ormanizations (1)
Ebasco Services Inc. (Ebasco)
-~
-
,
J., C. Murphy - Sr. Resident Engineer (2) Moretrench American Corporation (MAC)
C. Wi114 -=
l
.
2.
Scope I
!
This inspection was conducted to observa and evaluate the work in progress and to ascertain whether activities relative to site preparation are being accomplished in accordance with NRC requirements
-
'
i and SAR commiunents, and to deternine if procedures and recordkeeping requirements have been developed and are being properly implemented i
l in the subject inspection areas.
.
.
'
3.
Procedure Review
,
The following Ebasco specifications, FP&L quality control procedures, construction site procedure, and contractor operating procedure
.
.
4
..
.
e
~ ~.. - -.
.,.-.ao.e***-===me
-**. ~.e===a-ee=+-
- + + * * ~ * *
-
- - -
- - - - -... - -.. -, - -,.,.... -. - _,
..----- ----_.-, --------.-, -. - -,.
- - -
_
-
-.. _ _ _ - -__
.-. _ -. _
- _ _ - _
_ - - - - _ _..
( p.
.
-
o
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
IE Rpt. No...$0-389/76-1 II-2-
.
~
-
-
.
- * *
..
,.
a
!
were ammined for conformance to SAR commitmancs, applicable dodes
-
!
and standards.
' ' ~
"
'!'
-
,
-
.
.
.
Document Number
,-
Title
.
FLO-2998.472 (15)
Daustering
-
{
FLO-2998.471 (12)
heavation and. Backfill
-
hwag/ Record Reviser of Dewatering QA,.10.8 (11)
-
'
Systems and Components Inspection of Excavations and
,
QI 10.10 (R1)
-
'
Fill Compaction
'
.
- Excavaf. ion and Backfill
~
CSP 25
-
Sheet Pile and Excavation
!
COP-2-1'
-
!
!
No items of procedural noncompliance were identified.
t
>.
-
..
I 4.
Observation of Work Activities
.
s.
Profect Status Prior to Commencement of LWA-2 Work
,
<
,
'
The soils above elevation minus 60 feet vara excavated and
-
recompacted to a relative density of 85 percent AASB0 cvar the entire plant area to provide satisfactory bearing, settisment
,
!
and resistenca to liquefaction characteristics. The final i,
. site grade is at elevation plus 18 feet and the ground water
'
laval $s estimated to be the normal high water level in tha
,
indian River at elevation plus 2 ft.
l
,
b.
Activities Observed
-
'
(1) Pile Drivina i
,
Raymond Incarnational has completed the driving of sheet piling and the installation,of the top wala for the I
reactor conrain= ant building cofferdam. The inspector
!
observed the driving of sheet piling for the intaka l
structura Cofferdam.
-
.
(2) Dewaterina
,
.
Moretrench has reactivated wells formerly used for Unit 1 to draw down the water level within the construction boundarias of Unit No. 2 from elevation plus 2 to minus i
15.
Excavations below elevation minus 15 will requira
,
l individual systems set up for each particular excavation.
,
The IE inspector observed the contractor installing such
.
- .1
.
.
y
_ __
....
,
e.
...
.. _...... ~... _ _.
,,,,,,,,,, _,,,.,
, _ -. _. - _. _ _ _.. - - _ _
.
-
..
.
_ _ _, _, _. _ _ _ _ _,,. _,. _, _
,
_,.., _,
... - -
.
-..
.
.... _, _... -.
_
<
..
c
.g...
g
'
U
.
..
'
,
IE Ept. No. 50-389/76-1
.II-3
,,.
.
.
j
- '
..
.
.
.
.
I a system for the* reactor conemi-ant building base pat
!
excavation. The well casing utilised,was 8 inch diameter
-
',,
PVC pipe, capable of witha*=ading 160 gai and meeting cada
'
j requirements ASTM 1785 and ASTM 2665. This internal well i
system should be capable of lowering the water table j
within the reactor conemi-c building area to elevation
.
minus 30. -
.
(3) Blasting. Excavation. Fill Placement
'
Since no structure has its foundation below elevation
.
minus 60 no blasting for ease of excavation is anti-
~~
.
cipated. The contractor.ha.s. removed the fill to ap-i proximately elevation plus 5 in order to commsence with r,he driving of the intake structure sheet pilas. No other excavation nor backfill opeations have begun.
,
...
(4) QC Inspect 1on and Laboratory Testing Facilities
,
,
The IE inspector observed the QC coverage being implemented l
ll for the above earthwork. activities and conducted conversations j
.
with several QC inspectors during the course of their j
surve411==aes.
These discussions indicated the inspectors
.,
wera knowledgeable with their respectiva quality, control
.'
procedures and they were found to be satisfactorily implementing them. An inspection was made of the FP&L soils laboratory facilities, noting pare 4 ant =*17 their testing capabilities, checking for up-to-data calibration
-
of equipment,. and the experience of its personnel.
No items of noncompliance were identified in say of the above areas of inspection.
,
5.
Record Review
.
The following quality records were selected for review to ascertain that,the work was being accomplished and documented in accordanca with applicabla codes, commitments and procedural requirements:
a.
Rasetor Containment Building Cofferdam Report. Package containing QC survef11 mace inspection reports for pila driv 1ng and.
associated nonconformance reports for the per1od 6/3/76 to
'7/27/76 b.
Main Yard Dewatering System Testing Records conducted 7/27/76
.
e
_,......
,
,-
.
....... - -.. - -. * -
- - - -....
. _ _ - _.. _.
_. _ _ _ _ _... _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _..
__ _ _
_ _
_. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _
o
-
,.
..
.
.
.
.
.
..
'
'
'
IE Ept. Noe 50-389/76-1 II-4
-
..
'
.
\\
.
l
-..
.
,.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
Certificationis and personnel qualification' records for various c.
soil inspectors
,
'
.
d.
Inspector tr=4=4=5 records
.
,'
e.
Sheet Filing W=1diac i
(1) Welding procedure qualifications
(2) Walder performanca qualifications
.
(3)
W=144=
materials control records
_
~
.
I A
No itans of noncompliance we'r's ' identified in any of the above areas l,
of record laspection.
w..
.
!
6.
Nondirected Insnection Activities
'
'
i
.
.
Tha'IE inspector made a cursory inspection of the concrete batching
j facilities.
The inspector also observed the sampling and testing
of a non-safety related pour (warehouse foundation) for slump, air
"
contane, tanparature, yield, and the molding of concrete cylindav s for compressive testing. All testing is afailar'to safety related-
.;
pours.
- .
No items of noncompliance were identified.
.
e
.
.
L
.
.
.
i
.
I
,
.
.
.
i
,
)
e l
,
e B
B
......
_...._ _._. _...
,