IR 05000370/1979015
| ML19254D429 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1979 |
| From: | Conlon T, Gibbons T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19254D419 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-370-79-15, NUDOCS 7910250491 | |
| Download: ML19254D429 (3) | |
Text
.
[
'o, UNITED STATEE
'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
REGION 11 g
- . r
'*
o 101 MARIETTA ST N.W.. sulTE 3100 g*
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 3o3o3
.....
'
.
.
Report No. 50-370/79-15 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 S. Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name: McGuire Nuclesr Station, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-370/79-15 License No. CPPR-F4 Inspection at McGuire Site near Charlotte, North Carolina Inspector: -
. I. [n ;
t /- 7 T. D. Gibbons Date Signed Approved by:
d
/
n/
@-.2 7 - 79 T. E. Conlon, Section Chief, RC&ES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on August 8-10, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 21 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of instrumentation work and work activities, and instrumentation quality records.
Results if the two areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identi-fied in one area; one apparent item of noncompliance was found in one area (79-15-01 Failure to perform receiving inspection prior to installation).
1209 MS
<
7910250 N
- -
.
-
.
DETAILS
.
.
1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- G. W. Grier, Project Engineer
- E. B. Miller, Project Seni r QA Engineer
- S. Kisida, QA Engineer
- W. D. Henry, QA Manager Construction
- J. W. Glenn, Associate QA Engineer
- Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were sunmarized on August 10, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
The item of noncompliance identified in Paragraph 7 was discussed with the licensee.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspector selected MC 1354.02-3 cable specification for a review of required vendor documentation.
The package contained approximately one bradred vendor test reports on various reels of cable supplied to the site by two different cable vendors. The Westinghouse Shop Order DAP-330 package was reviewed to assure that the requirements of the above contract specifica-tion were complied with. This work was done at the licensee's office in Charlotte.
Three cables were selected at random and checked to assure traceability back to the reel, receiving report (PIA) and to the specification. The cables selected are as follows:
Cable Reel Number Specification PIA Date 1*NI 1036 356A-AA 1354-02-07 5/10/76 1*NI 1034 364A-AA 1354-02-07 5/10/76 1*NI 546 4X-0851-2-1-1-2-AA 1354 ^?-07 5/19/76 Within the areas examined there were no items of
. compliance identified.
'
'
T209 M6
-
.
-2-
,
6.
Instrumentation (Components and Systems) - Observation of Work and Work Activities The upper head injection (UHI) accumulator level sensors 2 NILS 5720, 2 NILS 5730, 2 NILS 5740 and 2 NILS 5750 and the accumulator tank pressure transmitter 2NIPT5050 were examined to assure compliance with DPC
" Instrumentation Process Control and Inspection Procedure," M61 and specific installation drawings MC-2499-NI42, M2499-NI8.01 and M2499-NI8.02 in the areas of location, placement mounting and inspection. The functional testing and calibration will be done by Steam Production department during the startup testing.
Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identified.
7.
Instrumentation (Components and Systems) - Review of Quality Records The records for the instruments identified in paragraph 6 were reviewed to assure that the requirements of the QAM and procedures M61 and P1 were complied with in the areas of receiving inspection, material certification, storage handling, identification, installation, installation inspection and documentation. An item of noncompliance was identified during the review of the PIA for the UHI accumulation level sensors.
The PIA noted that receiving inspection was performed af ter the instruments were installed because the instruments bypassed the normal receiving process. The failure to perform receiving inspection prior to installation as required by procedure P1 is a deficiency.
There is no safety significance to this item and it appears to be an isolated case.
This deficiency will be identified by 79-15-01, " Failure To Perform Receiving Inspection Prior To Installation".
The inspector selected five nonconformance reports as follows: 9133, 9145, 8957, 9043 and 9137 to assure that the reports were legible, complete, reviewed as requireu, retrievable and that status is current.
Four QA audits were reviewed to assure that the required audits were performed, the deficiencies were corrected and that corrective action included nonrecur-rence actions.
The audits reviewed were I-1-1-79, I-1-12-79, I-1-11-78 and I-1-2-79.
The audit I-1-2-79 had not been typed and signed.
The completed signed audit will be reviewed on a future inspection. This will be an Inspector Followup Item identified as 79-15-02 (Followup on Audit I-1-2-79).
1209 317
-
.