IR 05000361/1980023
| ML19341D177 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1981 |
| From: | Faulkenberry B, Pate R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19341D174 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-80-23, NUDOCS 8103050061 | |
| Download: ML19341D177 (3) | |
Text
U.S. fiLC'. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO (
.
OFFICE OF ItiSPECT!0:1 AflD EtlFORCEMEfiT
.
REGIO!l V Report fio. _ 50-361/80-23 Occket fio.
50-361 License fio.
CPPR-97
_ Safeguards Group
,
Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
_
Rosemead, California 91770
_
Facility flame:
San Onofrc Unit 2 Inspection at:
San Diego County, California November 15 to December 18, 1980 Inspection conducted: _
Inspectors: fk.)mg[b
/ //$ ///
/
R. J. Pate, Senior,Jesident Inspector Date Signed
(
Date Signed Date Signed Approved By: fd2dGhed
///v/f/,
B. H. Faulkenberry, Chief vReacgr Projects Section 2, Date Signed Reactor Operations and iiuclear Support Branch Summa ry :
Inspec+1 n on iiovember 15 to December 18,1980 (Report flo. 50-361/80-23)
Areas inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee's preoperational test program and procedures and independent inspection effort. The inspection involved 47 inspector-hours onsite by one fiRC inspector.
Results.
Of the f;'/e areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8103050 0 6i RV Fonn 219 (2)'
_.
,
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted a.
Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
+*K. A. Slagel, Startup Management Supervisor
+*P. R. Belhaneur, Startup Quality Supervisor
+G. A. Chaves, Project Startup Supervisor
- K. E. O' Connt, NSSS Test Operations Supervisor
+*P. A. Croy, Site Project Quality ' Assurance Supervisor
+G. K. Noel, Plant Training Administrator D. Stonecipher, Operations Quality Assurance Supervisor C. R. Horton, Startup Quality Assurance Engineer
+W. McGhee, Operations Training Administrator
-
+V.- B. Fisher, Supervisor, Plant Operations b.
Bechtel Corporation
+W. E. French, Quality Assurance Engineering Supervisor R. Gross, Nuclear Engineer D. W. Strolman, Startup Quality Assurance Supervisor
- J. E. Geiger,. Project Quality Assurance Supervisor In addition, construction and maintenance craf tsmen, engineers and foremen. 're contacted during the inspection.
- Denotes attendees at Management meeting on December 4,1980.
tDenotes attendees at Management meeting on December 18, 1980.
-
2.
Plant Status This licensee reported cn the Unit 2 construction to be 97 percent complete as of December 17, 1980.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Finding
~
The inspector examined the action taken by the licensee on a previous inspector-identified concern as follows:
(Closed) Follow-up Item (50-361/80-17/03):
The inspector identified an area with excessive trash and litter at the 64-foot elevation of the Unit 3 penetration building.
SCE QA personnel inspected all of the plant buildings and identified two additional areas with excessive trash and litter'. The specific areas identified were cleared. Bechtel's corrective action included cleaning all plant buildings over a weekend with a crew cf 97 laborers.
Also, the construction superintendents were assigned specific housekeeping areas to be maintained to an acceptable level.
~
%
m
'
.
.
.2 Plant tours by the inspector have not identified any additional areas with unacceptable housekeeping. This item is closed.
4.
Operating Staff Trairing Training classes on 4KV and 480 volt systems were audited by the inspector.
The presentations were well organized with visual aids and handouts. The instructors were knowledgeable about the materials being presented.
The classroom was a temporary trailer with no built-in visual aid capabilities.
Improved facilities are planned that will provide more flexability in the use of visual aids.
flo items of noncompliance or deviations were observed.
5.
Observation of Praoperational Test Portions of the Containment Integrity Test (CIT) and Containment Leak Rate Tests (CILRT) were observed. The installation of the wires and measuring sensors for the containment wall expansion and the data collection logger for the CIT was observed.
The preliminary data for the CIT was reviewed. A post CILRT containment inspection for equip-ment degradation after blowdown was made, fio items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Plant Tcur The inspector toured Unit 2 several times during the report period.
Particular attention was directed to observing housekeeping, equipment preservation, maintenance activities and work on completed systems.
flo items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Management Intervieu On December 4 ana 18, 1980, the inspector met with licensee representatives identified in Paragraph 1 to discuss the scope and findings of the inspection.
,.
m,
._
_