IR 05000361/1980005
| ML13323A401 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/20/1980 |
| From: | Dodds R, Eckhardt J, Hernandez G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13323A400 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-80-05, 50-361-80-5, 50-362-80-03, 50-362-80-3, NUDOCS 8007170539 | |
| Download: ML13323A401 (6) | |
Text
U. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION V
50-361/80-05 Report No. 50-362/80-03 Docket N. 50-362 License N RppA7 Rppp985afeguards Group Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 San Onofre Unit 2 and 3 Facility NZame:-
Construction Site, San Diego County, California Inspection at:
March 24-27, 1980 Inspection conduc ed:
Inspectors J H. Eckhardt, Reactor Inspector tate'Signed rnandez, React& Inspector
'Date Signed Date Signed Approved By:_ R. T. Dodds, Chief, Engineering Support Section DatA Signed Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Summary:
Inspection on March 24-27, 1980 (Report No. 50-361/80-05 and 50-362/80-03).
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection by regional based inspectors of construction activities including:
previous open items, cable installation, and pipe supports and restraints. The inspection involved 48 onsite inspector hours by two NRC inspector Results:
Of the areas inspected, no.items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie RV Form 219 (2.)
80 0'71'705 DETAILS 1. Individuals Contacted a. Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
P. A. Croy, Site Project Quality Assurance Supervisor R. R. Hart, Construction Manager D. B. Schone, Lead Engineering Site Representative
- W. L. Rossfeld, Construction Lead QA Engineer W. Petro, Assistant Project Manager S. S. Dziewit, QA Engineer V. A. Gow, QA Engineer E, McLaughli;n, QA Eng-ineer b. Bechtel Power Corporation (Bechtel)
- R. H. Cutler, Project Field Engineer
- L. W. Hurst, Project Field QA Supervisor W. D. Nichols, Assistant Project Field Engineer A. L. Erickson, Project Field QC Engineer J. McAlary, Welding Field Engineer H. Bumgarner, Welding Field Engineer S. Scott, Field Engineer G. Austerman, Lead Pipe Support Group L. Garvey, Assistant Lead Pipe Support Group J. T. Lorenzen, Lead Construction Field Engineer T. R. Moskalyk, Construction Field Engineer
- Denotes those attending exit intervie. Plant Tour The inspectors toured various areas of the plant to observe work activities in progress, completed work, and construction statu During this tour, the inspectors observed several installed concrete expansion anchor bolts with the alphabetic symbol shaved off the end of the bolt. The alphabetic symbol denotes the length of the anchor bolt and is used by QC inspectors to verify embedment depth after installation. The inspectors requested that the anchor embedment depth be verified for the following supports:
(1) S2-AS-028-H-OOD (2) S2-AS-028-H-OOC (3) S2-AS-028-H-OOB (4) S3-FS-076-H-007
-2 The licensee stated that they would comply with the request and have the results available for review during a future inspection. This item is unresolved pending that review. (50-361/80-05/01)
3. Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings The inspectors examined the action taken by the licensee on the following outstanding items: (Closed) Noncompliance (50-361/79-08/01) Pipe support No. S2-CS 001-H-020 was not installed in accordance with prescribed drawing Intermittent 5/16 inch fillet welds specified by the drawing for the strut to pipe sleeve connection were omitte The correction action identified in the licensee's response dated May 23, 1979 was reviewed. The inspectors verified that the spec ified action had been implemented and that appropriate instructions and training had been given to all pipe support inspector In addition, during this inspection fourteen (14) fixed pipe supports from the radwaste building and the Unit 2 containment were examined for compliance with licensee and ASME code requirements. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified during this examina tion. This item is close (Closed) Open Item (50-361/80-01/01) Verification of snubber load settings was not required by procedur The licensee issued Procedure Change Notice (PCN) No. 1 to WPP/QCI-404 directing the fabrication shop pipe support construction field engineer to verify snubber load settings against the applicable drawing and, if different than specified, to deface the old settings and metal stamp or electric etch the new settings on the nameplate. This item is close (Closed) Noncompliance (50-361/79-29/01) Installed electrical cable exceeding minimum bend radiu The Class 1E cable which had been doubled back on itself and stuffed into a conduit in order to take up excess slack had been replace The presently installed cable was inspected. During examination of other installed cable as discussed in paragraph 5, no cases of exceeding minimum bend radius were identified. This item is close. Safety Related-Pipe Support and Restraint Systems a. Review of Quality Assurance Implementing Procedures The following procedures and specifications for the design, erection, installation, and inspection of safety-related pipe supports were reviewed for compliance with licensee and ASME code requirement (1) WPP/QC1 Number 26, Revision 6.0, Control and Identification of ASME Section III Pipe Support Materia (2) WPP/QC1 Number 200, Revision 11,0, Control of Welding Filler Materia (3) WPP/QC1 Number 202, Revision 7.0, Welding Control for AWS 01.1 Weldin (4) WPP/QC1 Number 414, Revision 5.0, Field Fabrication and Install ation of Pipe Supports of Project Class A-I & (5) Specification Number CS-P206, Revision 7, Design Guide for Supporting Small Piping (2 inch and under).
(6) Specification Number CS-P207, Revision 6, Pipe Support Field Fabrication and Installatio No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie b. Observation of Work and Work Activities The following safety related pipe supports were selected for examination:
Radwaste Building System Support Number Component Cooling SA-CC-132-H-007 Water SA-CC-112-H-002 S2-CC-243-H-023 S2-CC-210-H-004 Boric Acid Make-up S2-BM-003-H-011
-4 Containment No. 2 System Support Number Component Cooling S2-CC-006-H-015 Water S2-CC-008-H-014 S2-CC-072-H-003 S2-CC-076-H-015 S2-CC-076-H-017 Safety Injection S2-SI-087-H-016 S2-SI-087-H-005 Reactor Coolan~nt S2-RC-01.7-H-031 Steam S2-ST-016-H-017 The supports were all of fixed design, quality class Q, seismic category I and ASME class 1, 2, or 3. The supports were examined to ascertain conformance to applicable drawings and specification No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie. Electrical Cable Installation Electrical cable installation was examined to ascertain compliance with the following construction specifications and inspection instructions:
CS-E01, Rev. 3, Installation of Electrical Cables in Conduit and Duct Banks CS-E02, Rev. 4, Installation of Electrical Cables in Cable Trays CS-E03, Rev. 3, Cable Splicing, Terminations, and Supports WPP/QCI-604, Rev. 7, Cable Installation Appendix I, Rev. 3, Securing and Supporting Cables Appendix II, Rev.2, Additional Work on Cable Tray with Cables Installed The following installed cables, which included both instrumentation and control cables, were examined:
Unit 2 - 2ARL03208, 2CRL09124, 2DRLO9110, 2AA04060B, 2AA040301, 2BDO4100B,
-2BA060401, 2BRL10301, 2CRL10301 Unit 3 - 3AA04130E, 3AA04160B, 3CD3RO1, 3AD1RQ1, 3BY0207P1, 3BBZ100A, 3AY0106P1, 3ABE220A, 3AA040901 These cables were in the reactor protection, engineered safety features, and radiation monitoring systems. Specific attributes checked included cable identification, routing, protection, and termination In addition, installation of cable 2BHL15401 from the Unit 2 cable spread ing room to instrument 2FT-9852-B2 in the fuel handling building was observed. This hand pull of approximately 600 feet of cable was routed in both cable trays and condui No deviations or items of noncompliance were identifie. Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)
at the conclusion of the inspection on March 27, 1980. The scope and
findings -of the inspection as: noted in this report were discussed.