IR 05000327/1987004

Insp Repts 50-327/87-04 & 50-328/87-04 on 870112-16.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Determination of Lower Tier Procedural Adherence to Rev 9 of TVA Topical QA Rept

ML20207T838
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	02/24/1987
From:	Belisle G, Runyan M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20207T829	List: IR 05000327/1987004 ML20207T827
References
50-327-87-04, 50-327-87-4, 50-328-87-04, 50-328-87-4, NUDOCS 8703240377
Download: ML20207T838 (8)

Text

.. ,

. . . _ . .-

...

Yh'

' '

1. UNITED STATES '

'

c 4. i* OTO,Io g NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION ,

[ '

o ./ REGION H >

~

'

0 a 10' W 4RIETTA $TREET. N.W., SulTE 2900 - "

• l o,

4 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 , ~, r

%,+... f  ;

-

.. '

.

.

'

, > .

Report Nos.: 50-327/87.04 and 40-328/87-04 ,

,.. ,> /

Licensee: Tennessee' Valley.Authoriti,

<

6N 38A Lookcht Plac ~-'_ ,

-

'

/

1101 MarketJStreat .

'

7', ~

ChattanoogaiTN 97402-2801 Docket Nos.: 50-327'cis 50-328 License Nos.: DPRkh and DPR-79 7.,

) , ,

.

Facility Name: Sequoyan 1 and 2 '

Inspection Ccaducted: January 12-10,398J, .

'I-2A-87

'

Inspector: ':N . >m w /:"'

M. F. Runyan

~

I , Date Signed Accompanying Personnel: M. C. Shanno'e , RII '

,

'

,

J'

G. k, Bel!sle,-RII .

W. Li'Belkef chQ 3 Approved by: 7/ / J ' '  ? 'I 2 V 7N G. A. Belisle,N ection Chief ~ 06te Signed

"

Division of Reactor Jafety .

,

'

7 SUMMARY ,

,

, a' 1 Scope: This special, annoeiced intpection was;' conducted to determine lower tier procedural adherence to Revisior, 9 of the.1W Topical Ouality Assurance Repor '

,

. , .

'

Results: No violations or deviationi?pire idantirie '

C ,

,

, .-

-

j 9,

,

! '

.

_c . ,

> ).

.

• L ,, l

,

>'

.

' .

.,.=

f6 i

'

.

'

t e

.

..

- '

.i

,

8703240377 870227

<

PDR ADOCK,OMOO327 ,

G g' - PDR

.

, ,

9 ,

"

,\ s

,3 ia '

., ._, __. - .,_. _ . _

.m.-_ -__ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . ,m _ . . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ .

_ _ ._ . . _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ .__ .. _ ._

7-

.. y

~

y?

< -

,

t .-

+ .

' *

,

% ,

_

"

,

,

REPORT DETAILS

, PersonsConkicted-7, ,,.

A ^

Licensee Employees -

r p : ,

,

p

• W."Ankrews,SiteQualityManager l

'

D. Cowart, Supervisor Quality Surveillance ,

D. Ja ylth, Quality Assurance (QA), Engineer

• M. HddacM, Supervisor, Quality Pro 7 rams t*C, Hansen... Licensing Support Section Supervisor

• G; Killlin, Branch Chief, Quality Audit Branch

"7 *J.ilaw,, Quality Systems Branch Chief vt *Rc ;tynskey, Manager, Programs Development Group

1. *L. Martin, Assistant-Director, Division of Nuclear Quality Assurance

• E. McKeown, Division of Nuclear Safety & Licensing (DNSL)

[.- *D.- Ormsby, Sequoyah Compliance Lickising

1- *A. Varner, QA Unit Supervisor y *J. Weinhold, Engineering Assurance'

,

, ~-

! Other licensee employees contacted included office personne {  ; p( <."

. f jf1RC Resident, Inspectors V ur >li*

< 'P. Harw h

sg D. Loveless ,

{

[ *Attenc'ed exit interview a pc r,

,

2. m ExitJJ.tervfew

, m i ,

p' ,

1 ,1.fne 'fas;ic;ththn scope and findinn were summarized on January 16, 1987, with those perso'ns indicated in pdalraph I above. The inspector described the

[  ; areas' iaspected and disclassad to detail the inspection findings listed

-

=y below. No dissenting commtentr were received from the license j , ,

i-'

?c r (' '

Inspector Followup Item: Division of Nuclear Engineering (DNE) and Division of Nuclear Construction (DNC) Procedural Adherence to the

.

<r

NQAM, Paragraph 5.,

,- ,

t ; a Icspegior Followup Item: Site Procedural ' Adherence to the Nuclear

'

t '-

'

,

Quality Assurance Manual (NQAM), paragraph 5.

I i The licenser did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided i

Wt to or revieped by the inspector during this inspectio ?

.

! 3.)

1 1 g- LicenseeActionon(P(evicusEnforcementMatters

'l

., o This subject was not a(dressed in the inspectio x, t I

,

t

' '

.

<

- ,5

- - -

- -

_

g, ,

y> r. .

.

-t> .

,

.-

-j s: p-N?, g

'

. Unresolved Items

% 4  ;

' Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio . - Review of ' Implementation of T$hical Quality Assurance Report t w The principal effort of this inspection was to verify that the licensee had

- fully impledented the commitmentsiin the TVA Topical QA Report (TVA-TR75-1A)

Revision 9. Implementation was inspected in two separate stages; from the Topical- Report to the NQAM and ,from the NQAM to Sequoyah -(SQN) site A procedure The licensee had -recently ~ developed . matrices correlating o 3- commitments in anticipation of this revie The inspectors utilized the Wp licensee's matrices'as a basis for their review.

I~ The matrix correlating the Topical Report to the NQAM was performed by the

corporate QA staff. Each commitment element was numerically' identified and

, correlated into one or more references in the NQAM. The matrix was

'

'

completed for Section 17.2 of the Topical Report, which delineates QA j requirements for operating plants. . The inspectors performed a complete line-by-line verification of each commitment element and generated atlist of 2 28 questionable items. This list included' items cited by the licensee as requiring an~NQAM change or revision as well as instances where the. cited i NQAM . references' did not appear to adequately cover the Topical commitment.

'

After discussing each of these items with the licensee, complete resolution was achieve In two cases, additional changes to the NQAM were1 prepare e Other changes and revisions were reviewed and verified < to satisfy the original discrepancy. In other cases the licensee found additional NQA references to satisfy the. Topical commitment *

b ... " " The licensee's interface verification between the NQAM and DNE AND DNC

.[y-procedures was still in progress and was not inspected. Until NQAM '

requirements are verified to be fully implemented in DNE and DNC procedures,

i this is identified as Inspector Followup Item 3??,328/87-04-0 .

On site, the inspectchs performed a spot (huk

.

t, the licensee's matrix L correlat\ng NQAM requirements to SQN sitt p ved- !s .

r In March 1985, Corrective Action Report (CAR) SQ CAR 85-03-004 was written to document a persistent failure to implement NQAM changes within the required 90 days. This CAR was still open on June 26, 1986, when the

-

interim NQAM was issue Realizing that many problems existed, SQN l requested and received' an extension..to)Dect:aber 30, 1986, to fully implement

the NQAM changes. This CAR was signed'off as ready to be verified complete l- by DNQA on December 30, 1986. At this' time, a matrix was formed identifying

,q site procedure changes 6ecessary to correct both existing discrepancies and M" those introduced by the revised NQAM. A total of 161 procedure revision

[ packages were generated. During the process of making procedure revisions,

other procedures were affected, and a total of more than. 400 procedure ~

' packa'geswere;ultimatelygenerated. Approximately 140 of these remain ope '

,

I k

u  ?

. . a.1..-.; . , , . _ . _ . , . _ . _ . . _ . . . . _ _ , . _..,,____.__,,.._,,_,..,,m...___ . , _ , . _ _ _ . , _ , . , , _

c__

.

'

e t The"fnspectors reviewed approximately ten percent of the NQAM-site procedure

'

matrix. The following is a list of general NQAM procedures reviewed:

.<,

Part.1 Section Part 1 Section Part' l Section > Part 1 Section' Part 1 Section Part 1 Section Part 1 Section 2.10 Part 1 Section 2.11 Part 1 Section 2.12 Part 1 Section 2.13

-

Part 1 Section 2.14 Part 1 Section 2.15

'Part 1 Section 2.16 Part 1 Section 2.17 Part 1 Section 2.18 Part 1 Section Part 1 Section Part-1 Section 'Part 1 Section Part 1 Section Part 1 Section Part 1 Section 'The'se- sections. generally contain paragraphs initialed Purpose, Scope, Definitions, Responsibilities, Requirements, Source Requirement Documents, and Interim Requirements. The typical review comments for these sections consisted of a statement stating that the programmatic requirements of this NQAM procedure as they apply at Sequoyah (SQN) are delineated in the appropriate Part II and/or Part III procedures listed in the Interim Requirements section and the applicable ' Inter Divisional Quality Assurance Procedures (10-QAPs) in that same sectio The Interim Implementing Procedures contain a paragraph that states that the requirements described in paragraph (whichever paragraph the requirements are in) are currently implemented in the following procedures. These procedures (or equivalent documents) shall serve to describe the Office of Nuclear Power (0NP) program for control and identification of items until all requirements are integrated into the ONP Corporate QA Manua The following is a list of NQAM Sections for which the matrix was verifie Part II Section .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. '

' 3.1. .1. '

3.1. F

'

.

Part II Section . . . . .3. .3. .3. Part II Section .1. .1. . .1. .1. .0 Part II Section . .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. Part II Section .4. .4. .4.1.2a 5.4.1.2b 5.4.1.2c 5.4.1.2d 5.4. .4. .4. .4. .4.1.7 l

Part II Section .2.1

5.2.2

! 5. . . .2.6

'

6. . .1.3

.

'

..

_ . . . _ . . . . . . _ .., . . . . . . _ . _ _ . . _ , _ - . , . _ . . - , . . ~ ~ . - _ . . _ _ . , _ _ - _ . . . _ _ . . _ _ _ . _

.

En

.

Part II Section . . . Part II Section .1. .1. .1. Part II Section 3. .3.1-5.3.1. .3.1. .3.1. .3.1. .3. .3. .3. .4 5. .5. .5. . Part II Section . . . . . . . . . .4.10 Part II Section .3 5. . . Part II Section .0 .2 .4 Part II Section .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. . . _ _ . _ _ . _ . .. . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ - . . . _ _ _ . . - _ . _ _ . - _. . . . - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ __

f

--

..

Part III Section 1.1 5.1.3 (13 items)

5.1. .1. .1. .1. .1. . .3. .3. .3. .3. .3. .3. . .4.2 i 5.4. .4. Part III Section 2.1 4.3.1.2 (2 items)

, 4.3.1.3 l 4.3. . 4.3. .3. .3. Part III Section 3.1 4.3.5.2

, 4.3. .3. .3.7 j 4. .3.9.1

! 4.3.9.2 i Part III Section 4.1 4.2. .2. .2. .2. .1. .1.1.2 l 6.1.1.3

,

6.1.1.4 (2 items)

l Appendix A (14 items)

.

l Part III Section 6.1 5.3.3.2 L

'

5.3. .3. .3.4 L

'

,. -

Part III Section .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. .1. Part III Section . .4.1 (2 items)

4. .4. .4. .4. From this review, approximately 15 items were identified where it was not evident that NQAM requirements had been fully implemente After further discussion with the licensee, this list was reduced to the following two items:

NQAM, Part II, Section 2.1, Subsection 5.4.1.3, will be further implemented in a revision to procedure SQM- NQAM, Part III, Section 1.1, Subsection 5.3.1.2, states that copies of DNE letters to manufacturers shall be forwarded to Document Contro None of the site procedures provided to the inspectors brought out this detai The closecut of these two items will be tracked as Inspector Followup Item 327,328/87-04-02.

!

i