IR 05000321/1979035
| ML19257D180 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1979 |
| From: | Dance H, Robert Lewis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19257D178 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-79-35, 50-366-79-39, NUDOCS 8002010496 | |
| Download: ML19257D180 (4) | |
Text
- pn nta
'o UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
$
E
.nE REGION 11
-
g,....[.,o
- 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o,
.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-321/79-35 and 50-366/79-39 Licensee:
Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Facility Name: Hatch 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 M m,:
R b 7d Inspected by:
.
-
i
-
R. F. Rog'ers
__
\\
'
\\
Da;e Signed
-
,
^2
'
~
/^
Approved by:
'
H. C. Dance, Section Chief, RONS Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on October 6, 1979 - November 9, 1979 Areas Inspected This inspection involved 90 inspector-hours onsite of technical specification compliance, reportable occurrences, housekeeping, operator performance, overall plant operations, quality assurance practices, station and corporate management practices, corrective and preventative maintenance activities, site security procedures, radiation control activities, and surveillance activities.
Results Of the eleven areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deivations were identified.
1855 066 800201
__
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- M. Manry, Plant Manager
- T. Moore, Assistant Plant Manager
- T. Greene, Assistant Plant Manager S. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations R. Nix, Superintendent of Maintenance C. Coggins, Superintendent cf Engineering Services W. Rogers, Health Physicist / Radiochemist C. Bellflower, QA Site Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and office personnel.
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 12 and 19, and November 2 and 9, 1979 with persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Plant Operations Review (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector periodically during the inspection interval reviewed shift logs and operating records, including data sheets, instrument traces, and
.
records of equipment malfunctions.
This review included control room logs, auxiliary logs, operating orders, standing orders, jumper logs and equipment tagout records.
The inspector routinely observed operator alertness and demeanor during plant tours. During abnormal events, operator performance and response actions were observed and evaluated. The inspector conducted random off-hour inspections during the reporting interval to assure that operations and security practices remained at an acceptable level.
Shift turnovers were observed to verify that they were conducted in accordance with approved licensee procedures.
'
1855 067
-2-6.
Plant Tours (Untis I and 2)
The inspector conducted plant tours periodically during the inspection interval to verify that monitoring equipment was recording as required, equipment was properly tagged, operations personnel were aware of plant conditions, and plant housekeeping and plant housekeeping efforts were adequate. The inspector also determined that appropriate radiation controls were properly established, critical clean areas were being controlled in accordance with procedures, excess equipment or material is stored properly'and combustible material and debris were disposed of expeditiously. During tours the inspector looked for the existence of unu ual fluid leaks, piping vibrations, pipe hanger and seismic restraint settings, various valve and breaker positions, equipment caution and danger tags and component positions, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, and instrument calibration dates. Some tours were conducted on backshifts and weekends.
.
7.
Review of Nouroutine Events Reported by the Licensee (Units 1 and 2)
The fr11caing licensee event reports (LERs) were reviewed for potential generic problems, to detect possible trends, and to determine whether corrective actions appeared appropriate. Events which were reported immediately were a'.so re"iewed as they occurred to determine that technical specifications were being met and that the public health and safety were of utmost consideration.
LER No.
Date of Repert Descriptioa 50-321/79-18 3/23/79 PSW Valve Lineup Improper 50-321/79-20 4/4/79 Fuel Transfer Canel Crack 50-321/79-25 4/27/79 H,0 Analyzer Isolation
50-321/79-46 7/18/79 FaiIure to Check IRM Alarms 50-321/79-84 10/17/79 Failure of Stack Flow Transmitter 50-321/79-83 10/22/79 RPS MG Set Failure 50-321/79-85 10/25/79 Setpoint Drift on RCIC Isolation Signal 50-366/79-47 6/18/79 Isolation Strainer Failure on PSW Pump 50-356/79-66 8/20/79 Excessive H Concentration in OffGasShstem 50-366/79-67 7/30/79 HPCI Steam Valve Motar Failure 50-366/79-78 8/2/79 High Moisture Content in Off Gas System 50-366/79-94 9/7/79 Inoperable Fire Pumps 50-366/79-95 9/19/79 Operator Error in Off Gas Oper:tica 50-366/79-100 9/17/79 CMDF Exceeded Limit 50-366/79-105 10/9/79
"D" PSW Pump Low Flow 50-366/79-106 10/12/79 Failure to Meet Surveillance Intervals 50-366/79-107 10/25/79 APLHGR Limit Exceeded 1855 068
i-3-50-366/79-108 10/19/79 Setpoint Drift en S/W Pressure Instrument 50-366/79-109 10/30/79 Swing D/G T.S. LCO Exceeded 50-366/79-110 10/26/79 Airlock Door Leakage 50-366/79-111 10/19/79 High Containment Pressure 9.
Technical Specification Compliance (Units 1 and 2)
During this reporting interval, the inspector verified compliance with selected limiting conditions for operation (LCO's) and results of selected surveillance tests. These verifications were accomplished by direct obser-vation of monitoring instrumentation, valve positions, switch positions, and review of completed logs and records.
The licensee's ccmpliance with selected LCO action statements were reviewed on selected occurrences as they happened.
'
10.
Physical Protection The inspector verified by observation and interview during the reporting interval that measures taken to assure the physical protection of the facility met current requirements. Areas inspected included the organi-zation of the security force, the establishment and maintenance of gates, doors and isolation zones in the proper condition, that access control and badging was proper, that search practices were appropriate, and that escorting and communications procedures were followed.
_.
_
1855 069