IR 05000321/1979002
| ML19281A410 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/1979 |
| From: | Fuchko J, Gillespie F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19281A400 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-79-02, 50-321-79-2, 50-366-79-02, 50-366-79-2, NUDOCS 7903130178 | |
| Download: ML19281A410 (4) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATES
- "8%g
- *
o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (
g
-
RFGION 11 g
g
+-
-r 101 M ARIETT A STRE ET. N.W.
,
ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30303 o,s,*****/
FE B - 61979
.
Report Nos.:
50-321/79-2, 50-366/79-2 Licensee:
Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street, N. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Facility Name: llatch I and 2 Docket Nos.
50-321, 50-366
-
,
License Nos.
DPR-57, NPF-5 Safeguards Group No.
IV Inspection at flatch Site near Baxley, Georgia
.
s Inspector:
1, h. bd lA!IS J.(1.Fuchko l ate Signed V
n j' { < '*>t, V
q Approved by:
'J l
'
/ /
F. P. Gillespie, Section Chief, Safeguards Branch Date Sign'ed
,
SUMMARY Inspection on Jan ary 14-16, 1979 Areas Inspected
.
This routine unannounced off-shift inspection involved 15 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of security plan, physical barriers, lighting, access control and compensatory measures.
.
Results Of the five areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
.
.
7903130 / 7 8
.
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employets
- M. Manry, Plant Manager
,
- T.
C. Wilkes, Plant Security Supervisor
- C.
R. Eiles', Jr., QA Field Supervisor
- C.
E. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor
.
,
Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included con-struction craftsmen, technicians and security force members.
hAttended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 16, 1979, with those persons indicated by an asterisk in Paragraph I above.
In addition, the implementation of 10 CFR 73.55 requirements and associated problems were also discussed.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Infraction (50-321/78-38-01; 50-366/78-46-01):
Failure to control access to a vital area. The licensee is now controlling access to all vital. areas and has modified the door latch as specified in his
.
letter of January 9,1979.
,
,
4.
' Unresolved Items
-
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Security Plan The inspector reviewed the licensee's Physical Security Plan, Revision 9 dated November 24, 1975, which was submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.34(c) and approved for implementation by the Of fice of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation on June 13, 1976..
Tests, observations and reviews conducted and documented in this report were to ensure compliance with the appropriate section's of the Plan, its implementing security procedures, and applicable requirements of 10 CFR 73.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
.
.
.
-2-6.
Physical Barriers (Protected Area)
At the onset of this unannounced inspection, the inspector examined the protected area perimeter barrier to confirm that it was intact and not compromised by erosion or disrepair. The licensee's compliance with his Physical Security Plan requirements relative to isolation zones (clear areas), parking facilities, control of vegetation, and integrity of gates was observed.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
- 7.
Lighting
'
During the course of the inspection, the inspector observed that the perimeter lighting met the requirements of the licensee's approved security plan.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Access Control (ID Authorization and Badging)
.
The inspector observed points of personnel and vehicle access into the protected area on two security shifts during the inspection. This check to ensure all persons and vehicles were identified and authorized was for entry into the protected area by members of the security force. Addi-tional checks were conducted by the inspector to determine if a numbered picture badge is being issued to all individuals authorized unescorted access and persons requiring an escort are being issued badges indicating an escort is required.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
Access Control (Search)
The inspector observed searches of personnel, packages and vehicles to determine conformity to licensee security p*rocedures.
The personnel searches observed included two security shifts. Currently, the licensee hand-held metal detector and/or a pat-down search to detect utilizes a unauthorized items.
.
, No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
- 10.
Access Control (Personnel Escorting)
All personnel authorized escorted access within a protected or vital area and observed by the inspector were properly escorted.
The inspector witnessed the licensee's utilization of designated vehicles to determine compliance with current commitment.
-
.
.
.
.
.
~
-3-No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
11.
Compensatory Measures The inspector reviewed the licensee's compensatory measures being employed to assure that the effectiveness of the security system was not reduced.
It was determined that the measures being employed, as observed by the inspector on January 15, 1979, did not reduce the ef fectiveness of the security system.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
12.
73.55 Implementation During the course of the inspection, the inspector observed construc-tion and installation of new security buildings and equipment.
At present, there are several major hurdles to overcome prior to complete implementation of the new security requirements. They are as follows:
a.
Approval of plan by NRR.
b.
Arrival onsite of missing security system components.
c.
Final installation of security components d.
Pre-operational testing of security system e.
Conducting of training for security system operators
.
f.
Rearrangement of protected area lighting to meet 0.2 footcandle requirement.
g.
Development of security procedures to interface with new system and plan.
All of these items were discussed at the exit interview.
.
O e