IR 05000289/1977031

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-289/77-31 on 770926-28.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Event Followup,General Plant Operations Including Control Room Observations & Previous Insp Action
ML19256D180
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/12/1977
From: Davis A, Kellogg P
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML19256D176 List:
References
50-289-77-31, NUDOCS 7910170680
Download: ML19256D180 (6)


Text

'

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,

I ]

0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No 77-31

.

Docket No. 50-289

License No.DPR-50 Priority Category C

--

Licensee:

Metrooolitan Edison Comoany

_ _ _

P. O. Box 542

__

,

i i

Readino. Pennsv1vania 19603 Facility Name:

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Inspection at:

Middletown, Pennsylvania Inspection conduct

Sep ber 26-28, 1977

-

/d /h77 Inspectors:

,

l

_

.Eugg,factorInspector dite signed

'

I l

u./

date signed h

date signed Approved by:

M

//// 2-h >

!

A. B. Davis, Chief, Reactor Projects date signed Section No.1 RO&NS Branch Inspection Summary:

Inspection on September 26-28, 1977 (Report No. 50-289/77-31)

Areas Inspected:

Routine, unannounced inspectica of license event fo~ilowup; general plant operations including direct observations in the control room; and

'

licensee actiJn on previous inspection findings.

The inspection involved 24.5 inspector hours onsite by one NRC inspector.

Results:

No items of noncompliance were identified.

.

1446 315 0b0 Region I Fonn 12 7910170

1 (Rev. April 77)

. _ _

_ _ _.

._.

_

.. _.... _. _ _ _. _

_ _. _

_..

_.

_

_

_

.. _. _. _ _.. _. _ _..

_.

e_.

_. _

,

.

.

'O

-

!

'

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted R. Bailey, Lead Mechanical Engineer K. Bryan, Shift Foreman

  • C. Hartman, Lead Electrical Engineer
  • G. Kunder, Supervisor of Operations
  • J. O'Hanlon, Unit Superintendent D. Pilsitz, Shift Foreman M. Shalto, Engineer Associate II, Nuclear H. Shipman, Operation Engineer II

!

The inspector also talked with and interviewed 6 other ifcensee l

employees during the course of the inspection.

I

  • denotes those present at the exit interview.

2.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings o

(Closed) Unresolved item 289/77-14-01, Co.porate Technical Support Staff (CTSS) review of 1976 PCR's.

The CTSS has completed the

'

review of 1976 Permanent Change Requests.

The inspector reviewed

.

the completed review forms for PCR's76-785, 786, 787, 788, and 794. ' PCR's 808 and 810 were not issued.

(Closed) Unresolved item 289/77-14-03, Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower Local Readout. The licensee has reviewed the local readout and is comparing these readings with the remote readings in the control room to verify the accuracy of the two indications.

(Closed) Unresolved item 289/77-22-02, Hydrogen concentration in

.

battery rooms.

The licensee conducted a test under Work Request 21030 on August 18-25 to determine the Hydrogen concentration in both hattery rooms daring an equalizing charge.

The test results indicated 0% hydrogen in the rooms during the charge.

'

(0 pen) Unresolved item 289/77-19-03, Corrective Actions for LER 77-03, 04-07.

The inspector reviewed the status of the corrective action for LER 77-07. The licensee's representative indicated the strut bearing modification would be completed during the 1978 refueling outage. The latching bar interlock arm modification will

' sta,lled by November 1, 1977.

L

'

\\

1446 316

.

e---

.-e

-

.-w ee

--.ww

-

e-ww-w-

--*W-e..w.

==-w--

w *-

e 7-w -

..

..

-

. - - -

- -._ _

..--_-

._

.

.

m

i 3.

Review of Plant Operations Shift Logs and Operating Records

{

a.

The inspector reviewed the following logs and records:

(1)

Control Room Log Sheets, July 1 - September 25, 1977

'

(2) Control Room Log Books, July 1 - September 26, 1977

.t j

(3) Shift Foreman Log, July 1 - September 26, 1977

(4)

Primary Auxiliary Operators Log - Tour Readings, July 1 -

!

l September 26, 1977 I

(5) Primary Auxiliary Operators Log - Liquid Waste Disposal Panels, July 1 - September 26, 1977

-

'

l.

(6') Auxiliary Operator Log - Out Building Tour, July 1 - Sep-tember 26, 1977 m

,

'

(7) Shift and Daily Checks, July 1 - September 22, 1977 (8)

E,quipment Lockout Tags 896-1097, July 1 - Septembar 22, 1977 (9) Do Not Operate Tags 1-40, July 1 - September 22, 1977

,

!

l (10) Jumper and Lifted Lead, July 1 - September 22, 1977 i

l b.

The logs and records were reviewed ta verify:

(1)

Log sheet entries are filled out and initialed; (2)

Log entries involving abnonnal conditions are suffi-

' ciently detailed; (3) Log Books reviews are being conducted by the staff;

,

(4) Operating orders do not conflict witn Technical Speci-fications; (5) Jumper log entries do not conflict with T.S. and, (6)

Problem identification reports confirm compliance with TS l,

reporting and LC0 requirements.

.

I446 317

.

-m.=e

-

-o-eu.e-ee.

.. -.., _.

,,

-

. _ _ _ _

_

_ _ _ _.

. _.

_. ____

_ _ _ _. _ _

_

.

.

.

-

c.

The insepctor used the following acceptance criteria for the

'

above items:

(1) Technical Specifications

(2) Administrative Procedure, AP10ll Rev. 3, Controlled Key Locker Control (3) Administrative Procedure, AP1012 Rev. 7, Shift Relief and Log Entries (4) Administrative Procedure, AP1013 Rev. 5 Bypass of Safety Function and Jumper Controls (5)

Inspector Judgement

'

d.

Findings were acceptable.

l

'

4.

In Office Review of Licensee Event Reports (LER's)

,

]'

The inspector reviewed LER's received in the NRC:I office to verify that details of the event were clearly reported including the accuracy of the description of cause and adequacy of corrective action, and the inspector determined whether 'further information was required from the licensee, whether generic implications were involved, and whether the event warranted on site followup.

The following LER's were reviewed.

77-11/1T - Engineered Safeguards Motor Control Center tripped

--

during power operation 77-12/3L - Engineered Safeguards Pump was removed from service

--

l prior to testing Redundant Pump 77-13/4T - Suspended Solids Concentration of Station Discharge l

-

--

!

greater than specified maximum 77-14/3L - Reactor Building Iso'lation Valve failed to close on

'

--

an Engineering Safeguards Test Signal

-

77-15/3L - One Auxiliary Transfonner was De-energized by event

--

in Unit II 77-17/3L - Reactor Building Local Leakage exceeded 0.6 La

--

criteria 77-18/3L - Nuclear Services River Water Pump Shaft failed

'

--

1446 318

.

e

.. <

.,.--,.e.

-*

  • -

---.e

-

-

.

-

_.

-

-. -

. - -

.. - -. _

.

.

V

t*

77-20/4L - Station River Water Discharge Temperature exceeded i

--

l 3*F oelow inlet temperature 77-21/1T - Reactor Building Atmosphere Sample was not taken

--

during an eight hour period 77-22/1T - Restrictions were placed on the Decay Heat Removal

--

Pumps Except as noted in detail 5 below, the inspector had no further questions on these items.

5.

On Site Licensee Event Followup For those LER's selected for on site follotup, the inspector verified that reporting requirements of Technical Specification and Regulatory Guide 1.16 had been met, that appropriate corrective action had been taken, that the event was reviewed by the licensee as required

by AP1015, Required Reports and Notification and that continued I

operation of the facility was conducted in accordance with Technical (]

Specification limits. The following LER's reviewed on site:

77-11/1T - Engineered Safeguards Motor Control Center tripped

--

during Power Operation

,

l 77-12/3L - Engineering Safeguards Pump was removed from service

--

prior to testing the Redundant Pump 77-14/3L - Reactor Building Isolation Valve failed to close on

--

an Engineering Safeguards test signal 77-18/3L - Nuclear Services River Water Pump Shaft failed

--

,

77-21/1T - Reactor Building Atmosphere Sample was not taken

--

during an eight hour period 77-22/1T - Restrictions were placed on the Decay Heat Removal

--

,

Pumps

-

'

This review included physical observation of equipment, descussions with members of the plant staff, inspection of the Control Room and Shift Foremans Log, revised facility procedures and licensee cor-respondence. With the exception of the licensee's findings, no other items of noncompliance were identified.

Unless otherwise indicated, the inspector has no further questions on these LER's.

L.

1446 319

.

.

-,, _.

.w._.~--

-._n.

-e~.

. - - - ~ ~

--,

_.. _ _ _.

_.

_

_

.

_.

.

.

-

,J

I With respect to LER 77-11/T1, Preventive Maintenance procedure E-5, 480v Circuit Breakers - Inspection and Testing has been revised to include a test to determine overcurrent trip plunger binding.

.

With respect to 77-12/3L, the Operations Supervisor, by memorandum dated May 23, 1977, reminded the operators and supervisors of the importance of procedural adherence and meeting the specific require-ments of Technical Specifications.

With respect to 77-14/3L, RB-V7 was cyc.ied once weekly for three weeks after cleaning dirt from the air supply solenoid and in-line filter. No subsequent malfunctions were noted.

'

l

With respect to 77-18/3L, a Preventive Maintenance procedure has

been issued to provide for the vibration measurement program and to establish limits and administrative controls for equipment usage as

-

the established limits are exceeded.

l With respect to 77-21/1T, the procedures for sampling (1631) and surveillance (1302-3.1) are being revised to verify proper vacuum

.

]..

and flow exist.

With respect to 77-22/1T, the interim measures to verify pump 9:j.

operability have been implemented in accordance with the licensee's

-

letter of September 8, 1977.

The inspector expressed concern over the licensee management controls that had allowed a refueling out-age to be completed without implementing the testing, recomeded by

l the NSSS, of the Decay Heat Pumps.

i

The licensee's representative indicated that spare parts had been ordered, but had not arrived at the completion of the outage.

The inspector acknowledged the licensee's concern over disassembling a pump without spares on hand, but also indicated that good engineer-ing practicies would have increased the priority of the parts to ensure they were on hand by the end of the outage.

This corrective action associated with this LER will be followed up on at a subsequent i

inspection.

(289/77-31-01)

6.

Backshift Inspection This inspection began at 00:01 AM September 25, 1977.

During this shift, the inspector observed training startups in the control room and monitored other activities.

Activities observed included:

.

Control Room indications for reactor building pressure, NaOH

--

tank level, RCS pressure and temperature, and control rod positions 1446 320

...