IR 05000289/1977026
| ML19256D224 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 09/16/1977 |
| From: | Baunack W, Dante Johnson NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19256D221 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-77-26, NUDOCS 7910170726 | |
| Download: ML19256D224 (5) | |
Text
-
_
--
-
-.
.
. _ _.
.--
.
.
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT O
,
I Region I
'
--
Report No.
77-26
~
Docket No.
50-289 License No. OPR-50 Priority Category C
-
--
i
~
Licensee:
Metropolitan Edison Company
,
P. O. Box 542 i'
Reading, Pennsylvania 19603
,
t Facility Name:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1
~
Inspection at:
Middletown, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted: August 30 - Septe"tber 2,1977 Inspectors:
V-4
7 W./H. Baunack, Reactor Inspector
/ date signed
]
cate signed date signed I
Approved by:
//f!
f////d i
D.'F'.'Jdhnson, Acting Chief / Nuclear
' date signed
!
Support Section No. 2, RO&NS Branch
,
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on August 30 - September 2, 1977 (Report No. 50-289/77-26)
Areas In.spected_:
Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee action on previous inspection findings, safety related maintenance activities, observation of control room operations, and a tour of the facility.
The inspection involved 31
'spector hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Res ul ti,. Of the four areas inspected, no items of noncompliance were identified.
.
i450 034
..
7 91 O 170 f Region I Fem 12 (Rev. April 77)
--
--
.
AJ DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Mr. D. Boltz, Shift Supervisor Mr. T. Brooks, Shift Supervisor Mr. N. Brown, Administrator, Nuclear and Technical Training Mr. J. Chwastyk, Shift Foreman Mr. C. Hartman, Lead Electrical Engineer Mr. G. Kunder, Supervisor of Operations Mr. R. Neidig, QC Specialist
- Mr. J. O'Hanlon, Unit I Superintendent
- Mr. W. Sawyer, Maintenance Engineer Mr. R. Troutman, Engineer II The inspector also interviewed other licensee employees, including members of the technical and engineering staff, QC personnel, s
,
reactor operators, and general office personnel.
]
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
h 2.
Licensee Action on Previour, Inspection Findings
'
(Closed) Unresolved Item i289/77-15-02):
The licensee was unable to provide the data recorded during the conductance of 1303-11.19, Turbine Overspeed Trip, Tast E performed on May 27, 1976.
The data sheet was reconstructed using available data from the GE Electric Turbine Generator Inspection Report.
(Closed) Unresolved Itea (289/77-15-03):
Decay heat pump suction vent valves DH-V25 A & 3 were not included in procedure 1303-12.4.
The procedure was modified to include DH-V25 A & B.
3.
Administrative Control of Safety Related Maintenance
~
The inspector reviewed the licensee's program for administrative control of safety related maintenance activities as described in the following administrative procedures as a basis for a review of specific maintenance activities.
Administrative Procedure 1001, TMI Document Control.
Rev. 10,
--
June 23, 1977.
1450 035
.
.
-
.- -
-.
_
.
.
.
O Administrative Procedure 1026, Corrective Maintenance and
--
Machinery History.
Rev. O, July 22, 1977.
Administrative Procedure 1027, Preventive Maintenance.
Rev. O,
--
July 22, 1977.
Administrative Procedure 1002, Rules for the Protection of
--
Employees Working on Electrical and Mechanical Apparatus.
Rev.
10, June 1,1977.
The inspector identified no discrepancies in this area.
.
4.
Review of Safety Related Maintenance Activities The inspector reviewed specific safety related maintenance a.
,
activities conducted at the facility on a sampling basis to verify the following.
.
(1) The limiting condition for operation was met while components / systems were out of service.
(2) ' Required administrative approvals were obtained prior
.
,q)
to initiating work.
_
(3) Approved maintenance procedures were used as required by the task.
(4) Maintenance activities were inspected in accordance with the licensee's requirements.
(5) System / Components were functionally tested and/or calibrated prior to return to service.
(6) Applicable quality control records were available.
(7) Maintenance activities were accomplished by qualified personnel.
(8) The circumstances of the maintenance were reported as Reportable Occurrences, if required ty Technical Speci-fications.
b.
The following maintenance activities were reviewed.
1450 036
.
.
-
... - _.
-
-
-
.
.
O
-
(1) Work Request #19415, Decay Heat Closed Cooling DC-V2 A &
B Controller. March 19, 1977.
(2) Work Request #18821, RC-V2 Leaking Flange.
February 7, 1977.
(3) Work Request #18035, Decay Heat Removal DH-V-5A Leaks Through. December 6, 1976.
(4) Work Request #14493, Decay Heat System DH-V-1 Limitorque Operator. March 24, 1976.
(5) Work Request #14606, "A" Diesel Generator-Air Blower Damage. March 31, 1976.
(6) Work Request #15358, Reactor Building Personnel Access Hatch. May ll, 1976.
(7) Work Request #15258, Control Rod Drive-Check Stators to Verify Proper Seating.
May 5,1976.
(8) Work Request #17228, RC Pump Speed Circuit Full Speed
.s()
Switch. October 11, 1976.
_
(9) Work Request #17780 Containment Isolation Valve CM-V2 Repair Seating Surfaces.
November 17, 1976.
(10) Work Request #17374 Vital 120 VAC "A" Inverter.
October 18, 1976.
(11) Work Request #17447 CRD Alarm System.
October 21, 1976.
(12) Work Request #17391 Control Red Drive.
October 19, 1976.
The documentation reviewed in this area included completed work requests, maintenance procedures, facility logs (for
-
plant conditions), completed sur.eillance tests, QC materiat acceptances, tagging applications, QC surveillance reports, and personnel experience and qualification forms as well as training and experience records.
No unacceptable conditions were identified.
1450 037
-
.-_.
-
--
.
.-.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
O
5..
Control Room Operations The inspector observed control room operations on both the day and evening shifts for 3 roper control ronm manning, and facility opera-tion in accordance wi % administr
and Technical Specification requirements.
No unacceptab'; conditiont %re identified.
6.
Facility Tour The inspector toured various accessible areas of the facility.
,
Conditions observed included equipment operation, work in progress, various monitoring instrumentation, housekeeping conditions, fire
'
i fighting equipment, and the conditions of pipe hangers and seismic restraints.
.
No unacceptable coaditions were identified.
7.
Exit Interview l
,
-
The inspector met with licensee representatives (Denoted in Para-C graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on September 2, 1977.
The inspector sumarized the purpose and the scope of the inspection and the findings.
.
i i
1450 038