IR 05000269/1979033
| ML19262C321 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 12/19/1979 |
| From: | Jenkins G, Perrott D, Taylor P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19262C315 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-79-33, 50-270-79-31, 50-287-79-34, NUDOCS 8002110245 | |
| Download: ML19262C321 (3) | |
Text
[
'-
UNITED STATES
- ^
!
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
n h
'
.E REGION 11
o 101 MARIETTA ST.. N.W., SulTE 3100 g*
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303
.....
Report Nos. 50-269/79-33, 50-270/79-31 and 50-287/79-34 Licensee: Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name: Oconee Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55 Inspection at Oconee Nuclear Station near Seneca, South Carolina Inspectors:
../
<d<eml
//O/79
,
D. L. Andrews Dale S'ig6ed hif?f
/- i to D. J.'Perrotti Date Signed h(?
I<
2hW79 P. A. Taylor /
Da'te $igned Approved by;
-)
d
/2[/'/N7
.' R.'Jenkins, Acting Section Chief, FFMS Branch Date Signed SUmiARY Inspection on November 30, 1979 and December 1, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 29 inspector-hours on-site in the area of emergency drills.
Results Of the one area inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
e 1945 318 ao 21.w. gg u
o
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. Smith, Station Manager
- J. Pope, Superintendent
- G. Vaughn, Assistant Manager
- J. Davis, Superintendent, Maintenance
- R. Koehler, Coordinator, Emergency Response Plan L. Blue, Health Physics Training Coordinator G. Schile, Training Coordinator C. Yongue, Station Health Physicist Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included two technicians, and four operators.
,
- Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview
,
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on December 1, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The licensee stated a critique of the emergency drill described in Paragraph 5 would be conducted on December 3, 1979. An inspector requested a copy of the critique be forwarded to the NRC Region II office.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Emergency Drills This area was reviewed with respect to the' licensee's commitments as a.
described in Emergency Procedures for the planning, execution and
.
evaluation of emergency drills.
-'
b.
During the period of this inspection, three NRC inspectors were on
~
site to observe the following emergency drill conducted by'the licensee.
~
(1) On December 1, 1979 the licensee initiated a simulated reactor accident where a pipe break in the reactor coolant system occurs in Unit 1.
The scenario continues to escalate where on-site and off-site radiological conditions dictate that station evacuation 19a5
,
-2-
,
take place along with activation of the Oconee Station's Emergency Coatrol Center, Technical Support' Center, and the Health Physics Center.
Environmental surveillance teams were dispatched to off-site areas to report environmental radiological conditions using simulated data.
Communication links were established with local off-site agencies where the Oconee and Pickens County Sheriff Departments and South Carolina Highway Patrol simulates traffic control in the exclusion area and the loa population zone. The Oconee and Pickens County Civil Defense Agencies simulated evacuation of portions of the low population zone.
The NRC inspectors observed the drill activities in the control room, site assembly and station evacuation area, along with the activities at the Health Physics Center and the Emergency Control Center. These areas were monitored in order to verify that:
(a) The emergency organization responded in accordance with approved procedures.
(b) The response to the emergency was coordinated, orderly and timely.
(c) The results of the drill and evaluation will be documented and reviewed.
The inspectors used the following acceptance criteria for the review c.
and evaluation of the above area:
(1)
10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Paragraph IV.I (2) Technical Specification 6.4.2 (3) ONS Station Directive 3.8.5 (4) HP/0/B/1000/13 (5) HP/0/B/1000/62/u Except for some minor problems in communications, the emergency drill appeared to satisfy the requirements of the emergency procedures.
Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
-
.
.#
-
.
1945 320